Cyclic Loading - Rock Dynamic
Cyclic Loading - Rock Dynamic
ّلِل أاْل َ أ
س َما ُء ا أل ُح أ َو َ ه َ
Rock Dynamics
Final term presentation
Lecture Topic:
Cyclic Loading
- For fatigue to occur at least, part of the stress in the material has to
be tensile.
- Fatigue is most common in metals and plastics, whereas ceramics
fail catastrophically without fatigue because of their low fracture
toughness.
- Fatigue failures are often easy to identify.
- The fracture surface near the origin is usually smooth. The surface
becomes rougher as the crack increases in size.
- Microscopic and macroscopic examination reveal a beach mark
pattern and striations.
Fatigue
Beach mark patterns indicate that the load is changed during service or the
load is intermittent.
Striations are on a much finer scale and show the position of the crack tip after
each cycle.
Fatigue
- The most important fatigue data for engineering designs are the S-N
curves, which is the Stress-Number of Cycles curves.
Fatigue Limit:
• For some materials such as BCC steels and Ti alloys, the S-N
curves become horizontal when the stress amplitude is
decreased to a certain level.
• This stress level is called the Fatigue Limit, or Endurance Limit,
which is typically ~35-60% of the tensile strength for steels.
• In some materials, including steels, the endurance limit is
approximately half (50%) the tensile strength given by:
endurance limit
Endurance ratio = ≈ 0.5
tensile strength
Fatigue
Fatigue Strength:
For materials, which do not show a fatigue limit, i.e.,
the S-N curves do not become horizontal such as Al,
Cu, and Mg (non-ferrous alloys), and some steels with
a FCC structure,
• fatigue strength is specified as the stress level at
which failure will occur for a specified number of
cycles, where 107 cycles is often used.
Fatigue Failures
By convention, tensile stresses are positive and compression stresses are negative.
Fatigue Failures
Examples of stress a
cycles where:
a) shows the stress in
compression and tension, b
b) shows there’s greater
tensile stress than
compressive stress and in
c
c) all of the stress is
tensile.
Fatigue Failures
As the mean stress, m, increases, the stress amplitude, a, must
decrease in order for the material to withstand the applied stress.
This condition is summarized by the Goodman relationship:
𝜎m
Stress Amplitude, 𝜎a = 𝜎fs 1 −
𝜎TS
Where fs is the desired fatigue strength for zero mean stress and
TS is the tensile strength of the material.
Example: if an airplane wing is loaded near its yield strength,
vibrations of even a small amplitude may cause a fatigue crack to
initiate and grow. This is why aircraft have a routine inspection in
order to detect the high-stress regions for cracks.
Fatigue Failures
Examples Related
To Cyclic Loading
hydraulic fracturing
reached. The peak pressure of each cycle
was incremented by 10% of the reference
breakdown pressure obtained from
conventional hydraulic fracturing
experiments on dry samples.
The breakdown pressure of the rock is
observed in the 8th cycle. The breakdown
pressure recorded in this experiment was 2519
psi which is 16% lower than the reference
breakdown pressure (2947 psi).
The decrease in the breakdown pressure is
considered significant and is attributed to
fatigue caused due to cyclic injection.
2-Fatigue in Airplane
In a pressurized airplane,
the fuselage becomes in
effect, a cylindrical
pressure vessel, which is
pressurized and relaxed
every time the aircraft
climbs and descends.
DETECTED REASONS : The lethal mistake in the design
of the Comet lay in not realizing
sufficiently the danger of
In each of these accidents “fatigue” occurring at stress
the cracks seem to have concentrations in the metal
started from the same small fuselage under repeated cycles
hole in the fuselage and of pressurization and de-
spread, slowly and pressurization.
undetected, until they
reached a critical length.
Whereupon the skin tore
catastrophically and the
fuselage exploded like a
blown-up balloon.
Rock Dynamics
Paper Related To
Cyclic Loading
- Previous studies show that the fatigue damage of rock has a “threshold
value,” when the maximum stress value is lower than a certain value, the
sample cannot be destroyed no matter how many load cycles are applied; thus,
the maximum stress has an important influence on the fatigue life.
- Using RMT-150C rock mechanics test system, the axial deformation, strength
characteristics, and rupture mode of the cycle loading were studied and
analyzed, and some useful conclusions were obtained which could provide
effective technical parameters for hydraulic fracturing.
2. Experimental Approach The shale samples also
show obvious anisotropic
characteristics
2-1 Specimens
The shale samples used in the experiment were collected from Longmaxi
formation at Nanchuan outcrop in Chongqing Province, China.
- in one meter, the number of bedding is more than 200.
- The fatigue properties of shale rock were studied under cyclic loading with
two principal loading orientations: parallel and perpendicular to the bedding
planes.
- specimen’s diameter is 50 mm, and its height is 100 mm.
- The average density was 2.665 g/cm3, and the average porosity was
1.25%
- The average P-wave velocity of vertical coring samples was 4667 m/s,
and parallel coring samples was 4306 m/s.
- vertical permeability was lower than horizontal permeability, with a
difference of more than 2 orders of magnitude.
- Mineral compositions showed in table 1
2. Experimental Approach
2-2 Experimental Design
The mechanical properties of shale are obtained by uniaxial
compression test, which provides a reference for the upper
limit stress setting of cyclic loading test
- Finally, the results of the fatigue tests were analyzed in relation to various parameters such as
axial strain, cycle times, and rupture mode.
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-1 Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Deformation
- The samples show obvious brittleness characteristics.
- For two principal loading orientations, the compressive strength and elastic modulus were
obviously anisotropic.
- For parallel coring samples, the average peak stress is 86.20 MPa, and average elastic modulus
is 15.95 Gpa, and for vertical coring samples is 116.49 MPa, and 15.26 Gpa respectively.
initiation of microcracking
occurred along the bedding
split tensile failure occurred
plane
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-2 Comparison between Cyclic Loading and Uniaxial Compression
- In Figure 5. The upper limit stress ratio of the cycle test was 0.90, and the amplitude stress ratio was 0.65
- In Figure 6, The upper limit stress ratio of the cycle test was 0.95, and the amplitude stress ratio was 0.81
- The figure indicates that the failure occurs below the maximum strength loading condition, as a result of
accumulative damage
I: stable crack propagation I: initial stage of fatigue fracture
II: unstable crack propagation II: stable crack propagation
III: unstable crack propagation
Figure 5: Stress-strain curves for uniaxial compression Figure 6: Stress-strain curves for uniaxial compression
(sample H-12) and cyclic (sample H-5) loading tests. (sample V-13) and cyclic (sample V-1) loading tests.
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-3 The Effect of Maximum Stress
- The effect of maximum stress on fatigue life indicates that the relationship between the
maximum stress and fatigue life is subordinate to the power-law function
-Results were shown that the damage from cyclic loading on shale rock was weakened when
the normal stress was perpendicular to the bedding plan
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-3 The Effect of Maximum Stress
- At 0.95 maximum stress levels, during the fatigue life, the axial strain has no obvious turning
point. However, for other upper limit stress conditions, the axial strain can be divided into 3
stages: an initial deformation stage, a constant velocity deformation stage, and an accelerated
deformation stage, with the second stage being dominant
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-3 The Effect of Maximum Stress
- The fatigue failure of shale rock is progressive accumulation of irreversible deformation in axial
direction
- For parallel coring samples, the irrecoverable deformation was relatively small at the initial
stage of the cycle, and irreversible deformation was mainly produced in the third stage. For
vertical coring samples, the irreversible deformation ratio was greater than that for parallel
coring in the initial stage, and cumulative irreversible deformation was mainly completed in the
first and second stages.
3. Test Results and Analysis
3-4 Fatigue Damage Evolution Characteristics
- Fatigue failure occurred when a large number of cracks coalesced into a macrocrack
- The constant velocity occupied most of the fatigue life, although the cumulative amount of
deformation was only one-third of the total. The remaining two stages experienced a relatively
short time, but the accumulation of deformation during these stages was very large.
- When hydraulic fracturing is carried out in the reservoir of bedding shale, the original natural
lamination seam can be activated by adjusting the pressure of hydraulic fracturing pump.
- A large number of testing results demonstrate that the peak strength of rocks decreases by
65% due to crack growth when cyclic loading is considered, and in this paper under cyclic
loading, shale rocks fail at a stress close to 80% of the peak strength under monotonic loading.
- The angle between loading direction and bedding plane directly affects the characteristics of
fatigue test. For parallel coring samples, the end deformation of fatigue test is consistent with
uniaxial loading failure deformation. But the rupture mode is more broken than uniaxial
compression. This indicates that, in the process of hydraulic fracturing, the fluctuation of water
pressure helps to open more bedding surfaces, to form complex network crack.
- For vertical coring samples, the specimen is very fully damaged after the fatigue load. Analysis
of fatigue damage variable at deferent load levels shows that when the maximum load level is
decreased, the process of crack initiation occupies a large proportion of the whole fatigue life,
while crack growth occurs at higher stresses.
5. Conclusions
- Shale rock is a nonhomogeneous material, and its fatigue life differs
greatly in two principal loading orientations, which results in great
difficulty in conducting fatigue analysis.