Scribd
Upload
18 views20 pages

Eio 2

This document summarizes a performance review of several VNA electronic calibrators. [1] Electronic calibrators can perform calibrations much faster than mechanical kits while requiring fewer connections, but have limited traceability and standards. [2] Testing found the electronic calibrators were generally as accurate as expected, with residual errors comparable to manual calibrations and high calibration repeatability. [3] Using a true through standard rather than a simulated one provided more accurate calibrations, and re-characterizing aged modules maintained calibration accuracy.

Uploaded by

Krzyszto FP
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views20 pages

Eio 2

This document summarizes a performance review of several VNA electronic calibrators. [1] Electronic calibrators can perform calibrations much faster than mechanical kits while requiring fewer connections, but have limited traceability and standards. [2] Testing found the electronic calibrators were generally as accurate as expected, with residual errors comparable to manual calibrations and high calibration repeatability. [3] Using a true through standard rather than a simulated one provided more accurate calibrations, and re-characterizing aged modules maintained calibration accuracy.

Uploaded by

Krzyszto FP
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

A performance review of some VNA electronic

calibrators

Presentation by Christopher Eiø

Præsentation: ANAMET, NPL Monday 18. September


Background

• The concept of electronic calibrators has been around for a


number of years

• DTI project has been to investigate the use of electronic


calibrators as transfer standards

• A number of papers around comparing electronic to


mechanical calibrations, including
– J P Ide, “Test driving the Wiltron 36581NNF AutoCal ANA
calibrator”, ANAMET Report 011, Oct 1997
– “Electronic v. Mechanical Calibration Kits: Calibration Methods and
Accuracy”, Agilent White Paper
How do they work?

• Essentially use a pseudo ‘SOLT’ approach

• Modules contain several impedance standards

• Standards are selected through switching; no need to


disconnect and reconnect standards
How do they work?

• A ‘through’ standard is required for two-port calibrations

• Most modules offer two options for the through standard:


– Actual through
– Device through
Advantages

• Speed: can be much faster than a mechanical calibration, but


can also be slower

• Fewer connections required: maximum of 3 vs. minimum of 5


(TRL)

• Size: much smaller than a mechanical kit

• Ease of use
Disadvantages

• Limited to the individual manufacturer

• No direct traceability to primary length standards

• Limited track record of performance


So are they any good?

• How do they perform?


• Calibration time
• Post-calibration residual errors
• Repeatability of calibration
• Comparison of ‘true’ and ‘calibrator’ through
two-port calibration
• Module re-characterisation
Modules under investigation

• Anritsu 36581NNF AUTOCAL (40 MHz – 18 GHz)


• Anritsu 36582KKF AUTOCAL (40 MHz – 40 GHz)
used with Anritsu 37XXX series VNA

• Agilent N4691B ECal (300 kHz – 26.5 GHz)


used with Agilent PNA series VNA
Performance: speed

• Speed comparison
• carried out using different averaging values

Default 128 256 512


Fixed load 3:00 3:45 4:40 6:30

Type N AUTOCAL 0:30 1:25 2:30 4:30

Time displayed in min:sec


Performance:
residual errors

• Typical residual errors can be found in literature1

• In general, residual errors close to those typified were


obtained

1N M Ridler & C Graham, “Some typical values for the residual error terms of a calibrated vector
automatic network analyser”, BEMC 99 Digest; and C P Eiø, “Typical residual error values in coaxial line
up to 65 GHz”, ANAMET Report 049
Performance:
residual errors

Test port match

3.5 mm calibration using


N4691B ECal
Performance:
calibration repeatability

• Perform six calibrations

• Measure a two-port device each time (20 dB pad)

• Take the standard deviation of the mean of both the real and
imaginary components at each frequency (Type A uncertainty)
Performance:
calibration repeatability

Up to 18 GHz

Reflection Transmission

Type N AUTOCAL 0.000 8 0.000 2 (0.017 dB)

K AUTOCAL 0.001 0.000 1 (0.009 dB)

GPC-3.5 ECal 0.000 4 -


Performance:
calibration repeatability

Up to 26.5 GHz

Reflection Transmission

Type N AUTOCAL N/A N/A

K AUTOCAL 0.003 0.000 2 (0.017 dB)

GPC-3.5 ECal 0.000 7 -


Performance: two-
port calibrations |S21| of 20 dB attenuator

0.105

Calibrator through

|S21|
0.1 True through
Cert values

Phase of S21 0.095


0 5 10 15 20

0.5 Frequency (GHz)

0
0 5 10 15 20
-0.5
Phase (°)

Cert values
-1 Calibrator thru
True thru
-1.5

-2

-2.5
Frequency (GHz)
Why re-characterise
the module?

• Internal standards may change over a period of time

• Traceability to national standards required

• Unavailability of modules with a particular connector type


Performance: re-
characterisation

• Perform a manual calibration

• Connect up the module

• VNA will re-characterise the module using the relevant


function

• To test, compare measurements of a 20 dB pad after a manual


calibration and after automatic calibration using a re-
characterised module
Performance: re-
characterisation

S21 of 20 dB pad after re-characterisation


0.0005 0.10

0.0004 0.08

0.0003 0.06

0.0002 0.04

Difference
0.02
Difference

0.0001

0.0000 0.00
0 5 10 15 20 0 5 10 15 20
-0.0001 -0.02

-0.0002 -0.04

-0.0003 -0.06

-0.0004 -0.08

-0.0005 -0.10

Frequency (GHz) Frequency (GHz)

Magnitude difference Phase difference

Module re-characterised with GPC-3.5 – GPC-7 adaptors to


provide 7mm measurement plane. A TRL calibration was used
to perform the manual calibration.
Summary

• In most cases, electronic calibration wins the speed battle

• The post calibration residual errors are comparable with those


one would expect from a manual calibrations

• They look to be very repeatable

• An ‘actual’ through provides a more accurate calibration

• Not done enough to state confidently about re-characterisation


Questions?

Spørgsmåler?

Vragen? Въпрос?

Întrebare?
Questions? Упрашания?

Tanungin?

Pytania? ‫ٲې ٲ‬

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy