0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views18 pages

NE364 Lec 08 New

The document discusses different methods for evaluating capital investment projects, including present worth, future worth, and annual worth. It provides examples of how to use each method to determine if a project is economically justified by having a positive present worth, future worth, or annual worth value. The minimum attractive rate of return is also introduced as the required return rate for a project to be considered a good investment.

Uploaded by

mondy.m.elgabry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views18 pages

NE364 Lec 08 New

The document discusses different methods for evaluating capital investment projects, including present worth, future worth, and annual worth. It provides examples of how to use each method to determine if a project is economically justified by having a positive present worth, future worth, or annual worth value. The minimum attractive rate of return is also introduced as the required return rate for a project to be considered a good investment.

Uploaded by

mondy.m.elgabry
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Engineering Economy

Lecture 8
Evaluating a Single Project
PW, FW, and AW

NE 364 Engineering Economy


1
Capital Projects Evaluation
1. Present worth (PW)
2. Future worth (FW)
3. Annual worth (AW)
4. Internal rate of return (IRR)
5. Payback period (generally not appropriate as a
primary decision rule)

NE 364 Engineering Economy


2
Minimum Attractive Rate of
Return (MARR)
A capital project must provide a return that exceeds a
minimum level established by the organization to be
attractive.

This minimum level is reflected in a firm’s Minimum


Attractive Rate of Return (MARR).

NE 364 Engineering Economy


3
Market/
Salvage
Annual value
Revenues

0 10

Annual
Expenses

Investment

NE 364 Engineering Economy


4
 A positive PW or FW or AW for an
investment project means that the project is
acceptable
 PW > 0 ✔
 FW > 0 ✔
 AW > 0 ✔

NE 364 Engineering Economy


5
Present Worth Method
 The most frequently used method.
 The present worth (PW) is found by discounting all
cash inflows and outflows to the present time at an
interest rate equal to MARR.
PW(MARR%)

 A positive PW for an investment project means that


the project is acceptable (it satisfies the MARR).
PW(MARR%) > 0 ✔

NE 364 Engineering Economy


6
Example 1
Consider a project that has an initial investment of
$50,000 and that returns $18,000 per year for the
next four years. If the MARR is 12%, is this a good
investment?

PW(12%) = -50,000 + 18,000 (P/A, 12%, 4)


PW(12%) = -50,000 + 18,000 (3.0373)

PW(12%) = $4,671.40 → This is a good investment!

NE 364 Engineering Economy


7
Example 2
A piece of new equipment has been
proposed by engineers to increase
the productivity of a certain manual
welding operation. The investment
cost is $25,000, and the equipment
will have a market value of $5,000 at
the end of a study period of five
years.
Increased productivity attributable to
the equipment will amount to $8,000
per year after extra operating costs
have been subtracted from the
revenue generated by the additional
production.
If the firm's MARR is 20% per year,
is this proposal a sound one? Use the
PW method.
NE 364 Engineering Economy
8
Example 2 Solution
PW(20%)=

$8,000(P/A,20%,5) + $5,000(P/F,20%,5) – $25,000

=$934.29

This equipment is economically justified

NE 364 Engineering Economy


9
Future Worth Method

 FW is based on the equivalent worth of all cash


inflows and outflows at the end of the study
period at an interest rate equal to MARR.
 Decisions made using FW and PW will be the
same.

NE 364 Engineering Economy


10
Example 2 again using FW
A piece of new equipment has been
proposed by engineers to increase
the productivity of a certain manual
welding operation. The investment
cost is $25,000, and the equipment
will have a market value of $5,000 at
the end of a study period of five
years.
Increased productivity attributable to
the equipment will amount to $8,000
per year after extra operating costs
have been subtracted from the
revenue generated by the additional
production.
If the firm's MARR is 20% per year,
is this proposal a sound one? Use the
FW method.
NE 364 Engineering Economy
11
Example 2 Solution
PW(20%)=
– $25,000 +$8,000(P/A,20%,5) +
$5,000(P/F,20%,5)
=$934.29
FW(20%)=
$5,000 +$8,000(F/A,20%,5) – $25,000(F/P,20%,5)
=$2,324.80
This equipment is economically justified

NE 364 Engineering Economy


12
Annual Worth Method
 Annual worth is an equal periodic series of
dollar amounts that is equivalent to the cash
inflows and outflows, at an interest rate equal
to MARR.
 The AW of a project is annual equivalent
revenue or savings minus annual equivalent
expenses, less its annual capital recovery (CR)
amount.

NE 364 Engineering Economy


13
Capital Recovery
 CR is the annual equivalent cost of the capital
invested.

 The CR covers the following items.


 Loss in value of the asset.
 Interest on invested capital (at the MARR).
 The CR distributes the initial cost (I) and the
salvage value (S) across the life of the asset.

NE 364 Engineering Economy


14
A project requires an initial investment of $45,000,
has a salvage value of $12,000 after six years, incurs
annual expenses of $6,000, and provides an annual
revenue of $18,000. Using a MARR of 10%,
determine the AW of this project.

Since the AW is positive, it’s a good investment.

NE 364 Engineering Economy


15
Example 2 again using AW
A piece of new equipment has been
proposed by engineers to increase
the productivity of a certain manual
welding operation. The investment
cost is $25,000, and the equipment
will have a market value of $5,000 at
the end of a study period of five
years.
Increased productivity attributable to
the equipment will amount to $8,000
per year after extra operating costs
have been subtracted from the
revenue generated by the additional
production.
If the firm's MARR is 20% per year,
is this proposal a sound one? Use the
AW method.
NE 364 Engineering Economy
16
Example 2 Solution
PW(20%)=

$8,000(P/A,20%,5) + $5,000(P/F,20%,5) – $25,000

=$934.29

FW(20%)=

$8,000(F/A,20%,5) + $5,000 – $25,000(F/P,20%,5)

=$2,324.80

AW(20%)= R–E Capital Recovery CR

$8,000 + $5,000(A/F,20%,5) – $25,000(A/P,20%,5)

=$312.40

This equipment is economically justified


NE 364 Engineering Economy
17
Thank you!

NE 364 Engineering Economy


18

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy