0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views40 pages

Unit 2 - PSY499

This document outlines key linguistic concepts discussed in Unit 2, including: 1. It introduces basic linguistic concepts such as word order, duality of patterning, phonology, morphology, phrase structure, and linguistic productivity. 2. It discusses Noam Chomsky's influential work on generative grammar and the distinction between linguistic competence and performance. 3. Chomsky's approach evaluates grammars based on their observational, descriptive, and explanatory adequacy.

Uploaded by

Noah Elton
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views40 pages

Unit 2 - PSY499

This document outlines key linguistic concepts discussed in Unit 2, including: 1. It introduces basic linguistic concepts such as word order, duality of patterning, phonology, morphology, phrase structure, and linguistic productivity. 2. It discusses Noam Chomsky's influential work on generative grammar and the distinction between linguistic competence and performance. 3. Chomsky's approach evaluates grammars based on their observational, descriptive, and explanatory adequacy.

Uploaded by

Noah Elton
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 40

Unit 2: Linguistic Principles

Dr. Ark Verma


Outline

• Identify elementary properties of language.


• Visiting Basic Linguistic Concepts
• Overview important theoretical positions about
syntax/grammar.
• Develop an understanding about how these concepts
might relate to psychological variables.
“I don’t want to talk grammar. I want to talk like a lady
in a flower shop.”-Eliza Doolittle/Bernard Shaw.
Why Is grammar important?

• Grammar consists of the rules of a language.

• Grammar lets one understand the properties of


language.

• It is matter of controversy whether rules of grammar


are psychological real or they just serve as descriptive
properties of languages.
Basic Grammatical Concepts: Word Order

Is “I see what I eat” the same as “I eat what I see”???


Word order

• Order of words in the sentences of the language


might have an impact on word meaning.
• Syntactic rules of the language determine the word
order. For e.g. word order is:
– Subject-verb-object (SVO) in English.
• The boy chased the girl.
• The girl chased the boy.
– Subject-object-verb (SOV) in Japanese/Hindi.
• Taro to hanako that book gave.
• Ram ne Sita ko kitaab di.
• However, not all languages are strict about word
order.
– For e.g.: Russian permits a variety of possibilities.
• Viktor celeut Lenu.
• Viktor Lenu celeut.
• celeut Viktor Lenu.
• Lenu celeut Viktor.
• These languages may make use of affixes for
conveying specific meanings (suffixes & prefixes).
– Trip, tripped, tripping etc.
– In Turkish:
• gel: come, gelemedim: I could’nt come etc.
Basic Properties: Duality of Patterning

• Unique to human languages.

• Why dual?:
– At one level, a large number of meaningful elements,
or words.
– At another, a relatively small number of meaningless
elements (like phones) that combine to form words.
– In spoken languages these meaningless elements are
individual speech sounds.
• Universal property of languages.
– All languages have duality: a basic level of
meaningless elements and a level where these combine
to form meaningful elements.
– All languages have a defined set of rules which govern
the combination of these basic elements to more
sophisticated elements.

• For e.g. port, plort & pbort.


• Which means:
– /p/ cannot be followed by /b/ at the beginning of the
word. Or
– A word cannot begin with two stop consonants.
Basic Properties: Phonology

• Acoustics: study of physical properties of sounds.


– For e.g. using a sound spectrogram.

• Phonetics: the physical properties of speech sounds,


manner & place of articulation.

• Phonology: the sound categories each language uses


to divide up the space of possible sounds.
– E.g. pin (aspirated) vs. spin (unaspirated).
• Phoneme: basic unit of sound in a particular language.
– Changing phonemes might affect the meaning of the word:
• In Thai, “paa” (unaspirated) = “forest” while “paa”
(aspirated) = “to split”.
• Hence they are different phonemes.

• Aspirated: sound produced with an audible breath.

• Unaspirated: sound produced without… .

• Allophones: different forms of the same phoneme.


– Pin & spin.
• Minimal pairs: two sounds in a word differing by just
one sound.
– For e.g.: “dog”, “log”, “cog” etc.

• Sound is produced by moving parts of the vocal tract,


i.e. lips, teeth, tongue, mouth and larynx.

• They are categorized on the basis of their source.

• Larynx modifies the flow of air from the lungs and


produces a range of higher frequencies.
• Vowels: sounds made with a relatively free flow of
air, the vocal tract remains more or less open. E.g. a,
e, i, o, u.

• Dipthongs: a type of vowel which is a combination of


two vowel sounds. E.g. boy, wow, cow, my etc.

• Consonants: sounds made by closing or restricting


some part of the vocal tract as the air flows through it.
E.g. p, b, t, d, k, g.
• Place of articulation: part of the vocal tract that is
closed or constricted during articulation.

– E.g.
• dentals: sounds formed by putting the tongue tip behind
the upper front teeth. As Ɵ (theta).

• labiodentals: sounds formed by putting the lower lip to


the upper teeth.
• Manner of articulation: Way of modifying airflow in
turn affecting the sound produced.

– E.g.

• stops: when the airflow is completely restricted, as in


/p/, /b/, /t/ etc.

• fricatives: formed by constricting airstream making


hissing sound, as in /f/, /v/, /s/ etc.
• Syllables: rythmic units that form words. Smallest
note in a word.
– Syl-la-ble (3 syllables), matter (2 syllables), Cat (1
syllable).

• Syllables are formed from:


– Onset + Rime;
• onset: initial consonant or cluster. E.g. /c/ in cat or /cl/ in
cloud.
• rime: nucleus + coda
– nucleus: central vowel. /ou/ in “cloud”.
– coda: final consonant or cluster. /d/ in “cloud”.
Basic Properties: Morphology

– Morphology: governs system of rules for word


formation. describes smallest grammatical units which
form words, i.e. morphemes. e.g. Simplest example of
morphemes is:
• Play + er = Player, where Play is a free morpheme (that can
stand alone) and ‘er’ is a bound morpheme that cannot stand
alone.
• Free morphemes can also be called lexical morphemes, i.e.
units that can stand alone as nouns, verbs etc. they do no alter
the meaning of words.
• Bound morphemes are also called grammatical morphemes,
they are tiny markers as (er, ed, ness) which can be added to
words and affect their meaning.
Basic Properties: Phrase Structure

• Sentences can be divided into smaller constituents


called ‘phrases’.

• Phrases can be understood as combination of a


critical word (noun or verb) with other words,
expressing a single idea.
– The young swimmer accepted the silver medal.
– (the young swimmer) (accepted the silver medal)
– (the young swimmer) (accepted [the silver medal])
• Phrase-structure rules: syntactic rules that specify the
permissible sequences of constituents in a language.

• The central idea is that sentences are built up


hierarchically from smaller units using rewrite rules.

• Phrase structure grammar: a set of rewrite rules.


• E.g.:

– (1), S-> NP + VP
– (2), NP-> DET + N
– (3), NP-> N
– (4), VP-> V + NP
– (5), VP-> V
– (6), N-> vlad, boris, vampire, ghost…
– (7), V-> loves, hates, likes, bites…
– (8), DET-> a, an, the..
• Phrase-structure ambiguity: p-s rules might also lead
to a degree of ambiguity. E.g. :

– They are eating apples.

– S: (NP)They (VP)are eating apples.


(NP) They (VP) are eating (NP) apples.

– S: (NP) They (V) are (NP) eating apples.


(NP) They (V) are (adj) eating (N) apples.
Basic Properties: Linguistic Productivity

• Our ability to create and comprehend novel


utterances.

• Given the infinite amount of possible utterances, we


must be storing rules (finite) for creating sentences.
E.g. by embedding one sentence into other.
– VP-> V + S
– (V) The child thinks (S) the man left.
• Another possibility:
– S-> NP + V + S

• Such a rule, which refers to itself is called a recursive


rule.

• It is resilient property of human language, even used


by children.

• We can coin new words when needed, also use


existing ones in new combinations.

• However, not all aspects of language are productive.


BREAK!!!
Linguistic approaches to syntax.

• We will visit a few theories pertaining to


syntax/grammar.

• Special focus on the work of Noam Chomsky.

• Revisit the relevance of syntax to psychological


variables.
• American linguist, had a profound Noam Chomsky
impact on linguistic thought.
(1928-present)
• Two ideas:
– Relation between language & brain
and child language acquisition.
– Technical description of the structure
of language.

• Acc to him:
– Language is innate, biologically
programmed, species specific.
– Independent of other cognitive
structures.
Chomsky…

• Distinguished between:
– Linguistic competence: our abstract knowledge of the
language. E.g. intuitions about grammatically
acceptable samples.

– Linguistic performance: our actual language


production, limited by our cognitive capacity. E.g.
simple grammatical utterances, speech errors etc.
Chomsky…

• Also specified:
– Externalized Language (E-Language): the language
we use. Samples & properties of real utterances.
Linguistics should be concerned with describing the
regularities of real language via grammar.

– Internalized Language (I-Language): the knowledge


of language. The mental phenomena that precede &
follow performance.
Relation between Language & Grammar.

• Language: infinite set of well-formed sentences.

• Grammar: formal device with a finite set of rules, that


can generate all possible sentences in a language &
no bad sentences. Hence, generative grammar.

• Theories of language, composed of more specific


hypotheses about the structure or organization of
language.
Evaluating Grammars…Chomsky!

• Observational adequacy: a grammar must be able to


generate all the acceptable but none of the
unacceptable sentences.
• Descriptive adequacy: must be able to describe the
relationships between utterances that are similar or
not similar. E.g. syntactic differences.
• Explanatory adequacy: involve s the ability to
explain the role of linguistic universals in language
acquisition. E.g. how children choose from samples
& deduce correct rules.
Transformational grammar

• Acc to Chomsky, phrase-structure rules do not


capture linguistic competence fully.

• These relations can be captured by a set of rewrite


rules, called transformational rules.

• Transformational rule: a grammatical rule for


converting one syntactic structure to another.

• Transformational grammar: based on transformations.


• Examples:

– Particle movement transformation:


• John phoned up the woman. (VP-> V + part + NP)
• John phoned the woman up. (VP-> V + NP + part)

– Passivization transformation:
• The vampire chases the ghost.
• The ghost was chased by the vampire.
Some more from Chomsky…

• Distinguished between:

– Surface structure: refers to the superficial


arrangement of constituents, and reflects the order in
which the words are pronounced.

– Deep structure: refers to the underlying structure of a


sentence that conveys the meaning.
• Lets elaborate:
– Flying planes can be dangerous.
– (deep structure ambiguity: single surface structure,
two possible deep structures).

– (a) John is easy to please.


– (b) John is eager to please.
– John is object in (a) while subject in (b).

– Arlene played the tuba.


– The tuba was played by Arlene.
– Same deep structure, different surface structure.
Much ado about gramamar…

• There might still be problems:

– Most grammars still cannot fully account for all the


linguistic utterances.

– They also do not take into account cognitive


processing considerations.

– Also they lack the details as far as smaller constituents


may be concerned.
Two alternatives…
• Lexical-functional grammar/psychologically
realistic grammar (Bresnan, 1978, 2001): takes into
account properties of individual lexical items, i.e.
words.
• Lexical entries include the various forms of the word
(e.g. kiss, kissed, kissing) and the types of compatible
sentences.
– Mary kissed John.
– John was kissed by Mary.
– kiss: (agent= subject, patient = object) &
– (be) kiss: (agent= object, patient = subject).
• Advantages:

– Helps simplify the explanatory burden to lexicon.

– Seems a more economical/plausible way of explaining


effortless comprehension of sentences.

– Take into account the consideration that working


through syntactic rules might be more difficult than
retrieving from the mental lexicon.
• Views of Ray Jackendoff (2002):
– Rejects the view that syntax is the core of our
linguistic knowledge.
– Rejects that linguistic productivity is solely due to
syntactic rules.
– Suggests that grammars have multiple formation rules
(syntax, semantics, phonology) which operate in
parallel to facilitate simplified language processing.
– Grammars must study these interfaces.
• E.g.
– It’s only a parent, not a teacher.
– It’s only apparent, not real.
Conclusions…

• It is important to know the linguistic rules to have a


deep understanding of any language.

• Deep understanding of properties of languages may


help in studying language processing.

• However, linguistic rules/syntax are not paramount


and alternative views must also be considered.
Thank You!!!

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy