Scribd
Upload
259 views2 pages

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla

1) The movie is about a committee of 12 people who must decide if a 19-year old boy is guilty of murdering his father. 2) Each member has a different personality and approach to the decision making process. Initially most agree on the wrong conclusion due to personal biases. 3) One member, with an active-constructive personality, convinces the others to reconsider with logical arguments. They ultimately reach the right conclusion.

Uploaded by

Aniket_n
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
259 views2 pages

Ek Ruka Hua Faisla

1) The movie is about a committee of 12 people who must decide if a 19-year old boy is guilty of murdering his father. 2) Each member has a different personality and approach to the decision making process. Initially most agree on the wrong conclusion due to personal biases. 3) One member, with an active-constructive personality, convinces the others to reconsider with logical arguments. They ultimately reach the right conclusion.

Uploaded by

Aniket_n
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

EK RUKA HUA FAISLA This is a movie about 19 year old boy who was a suspect for murder of his

father. There was a committee of 12 people assigned to decide whether boy was culprit or not. This is a movie about different organizational behavior. In this movie we observe the entire decision making process. Where each individual had different perception and different behavior in particular situation. their personal opinion leads them to one wrong decision first but later on with just one leading, convincing, neutral and practical individual, they were able to think on the other side of the case and finally they reached to right conclusion.

1.PLANNING: The discussion was planned in the mind of initiator. There was no intention to discuss the case in the committee, but this initiator planned this strategy accordingly and the strategy led to discussion.

2.ORGANIZING: After the strategy of discussion was implemented the person who was handling and controlling the committee organized the entire discussion. He organized the voting process and discussion.

3.LEADING: We observed that there was one person who was disagree initially with the decision because the proof for the decision making was not satisfactory to him. This dissatisfaction leads him to convince the other team mates to discuss more about this case and he required many logical points to reach to one particular conclusion.

4.CONTROLLING: One more observation about other personality was controlling by nature. This individual was the one who was handling the whole decision making process. Controlling always leads to aggression. So we saw that the person who was controlling and handling the committee was aggressive often.

DIFFERENT BEHAVIOR OBSERVED ACTIVE: A person active by nature always have the quality of initiating. In this movie we observe few active personalities, amongst one who was the initiator for the discussion. Other active members supported the initiative taken by that individual. ACTIVE-CONSTRUCTIVE: Active-Constructive people are those who are active in a constructive way. They are initiatives and ideas have a constructive thought in their mind. Relating this to the movie, we see that after the initiative of one individual was supported by few active-constructive personalities. Mr. K.K Raina is the best example of active-constructive personality. He initiated the discussion and he had supportive ideas. His arguments were more logical, practical and more based on reasoning. In the entire decision making process he was very patient and calm. In the end he convinced all his committee members who were against, with his practical approach.

Mr. Anu Kapoor and Mr. S. M. Zaheer were also active-constructive by nature as they brought many strong points during the discussion. ACTIVE-DESTRUCTIVE: Active-destructive are those people who have their original active ideas but supported by destructive behavior. These personalities are bias by nature and at times the personalized approach leads to destructive behavior. In the movie we see Mr. Pankaj Kapoor as an active-destructive personality. He was over emotional and he took the case very personally. He was very active in the decision making process but in a destructive way. Looking to some other Active-Destructive personality Mr. Subiraj was also a perfect example. He was active but he had community bias. Due to this bias behavior verbal conflicts arise amongst committee members and that situation leads the process to aggressive path.

PASSIVE: Individuals with passive personalities are those who never take initiatives and are least bothered about the situation around them. PASSIVE-CONSTRUCTIVE: Individuals who are passive-constructive by nature does not take any initiative but when a suggestion is asked they have wide and constructive ideas to share. In the movie we find Mr. Subhash Udgate, Mr. Shailendra Goyal Mr. Amitabh Shrivastav and Mr. Hemant Mishra with this kind of personality. This individuals were not initiative takers but when they were asked to support the case, they had very unique ideas and with that they supported the decision making process in constructive way. PASSIVE-DESTRUCTIVE: Individuals with this personality never take any initiative and even when asked for the suggestions they always have the destructive ideas. Never supportive in any situation. Mr. M. K. Raina is the best suited example for this personality. He was least bother in the decision making of one individuals life. His personal affairs were more important to him than the life of that boy. He didnt show any active support in decision making. He was highly influenced by majority. Mr. Azeez Kureshi is also had this kind of personality. Least concerned of the situation and enjoying personal leisure.

Thus, coming to the conclusion of the movie we saw that a person with active constructive personalty is always a good leader and we saw various other personalities and other management fundaments used in this movie. Thanks, Regards, Birju Shah

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy