Cost and Management Accounting - 231025 - 204341
Cost and Management Accounting - 231025 - 204341
COST AND
MANAGEMENT
ACCOUNTING
Module – 1 & Module - 2
COST AND MANAGEMENT ACCOCUNTING
INDEX
2AO
EOQ
Ci
1,00,000 units
Annual requirement (usage) of raw material in kg.(A) A 40,000 kg.
2.5 units per kg.
Ordering Cost (Handling & freight cost) (O) = 370 + 380 = 750
Carrying cost per unit per annum (C) i.e. inventory carrying cost + working capital cost
= ( 0.25×12 months)+ 12
A 40,000 kg.
No. of orders per annum ( ) 20 orders
E.O.Q. 2000 kg.
360 days
Frequency of placing orders (in days) 18 days
20 orders
(iii) Percentage of discount in the price of raw materials to be negotiated:
(No. of orders × Cost per order) (4 order × 750) (20 orders × 750)
(2,000 kg.× ½ ×
(Average inventory × Carrying cost per unit) (10,000 kg. × ½ × 15)
15)
48,000
So, Percentage of discount to be negotiated 100 1.5%
32,00,000
Question 5—
A company manufactures a product from a raw material, which is purchased at 60 per kg. The company
incurs a handling cost of 360 plus freight of 390 per order. The incremental carrying cost of inventory of
raw material is 0.50 per kg. per month. In addition, the cost of working capital finance on the investment
in inventory of raw material is 9 per kg. per annum. The annual production of the product is 1,00,000
units and 2.5 units are obtained from one kg of raw material.
1,00,000
Annual requirement of raw material in kg. (A) 40,000 kg.
2.5 units per kg.
Ordering Cost (Handling & Freight cost) (O) = 360 + 390 = 750
Carrying cost per unit per annum i.e. inventory carrying cost + working capital cost (c × i)
= ( 0.5 × 12 months) + 9
= 15 per kg.
A 40,000 kg.
No. of orders per annum ( ) 20 times
EOQ 2,000 kg.
12 months
Frequency of placing (in months) 0.6 months
20 orders
365 days
Or, (in days) 18 days(approx)
20 orders
(iii) Percentage of discount in the price of raw materials to be negotiated:
Quarterly order EOQ
Size of the order 10,000 kg. 2,000 kg.
No. of orders 4 20
Cost of placing 3,000 15,000
(4 order × 750) (20 orders × 750)
Inventory carrying cost 75,000 15,000
(10,000 kg. × ½ × 15) (2,000 kg. × ½ × 15)
Total Cost 78,000 30,000
When order is placed on quarterly basis the ordering cost and carrying cost increased by 48,000 ( 78,000
– 30,000). This increase in total cost should be compensated by reduction in purchase price per kg. to make
quarterly order placement rational.
48,000
1.2 per kg.
40,000 units
1.20
Discount in the price of raw material to be negotiated 2%
60
Question 6—
ZED Company supplies plastic crockery to fast food restaurants in metropolitan city. One of its products
is a special bowl, disposable after initial use, for serving soups to its customers. Bowls are sold in pack 10
pieces at a price of 50 per pack.
The demand for plastic bowl has been forecasted at a fairly steady rate of 40,000 packs every year. The
company purchases the bowl direct from manufacturer at 40 per pack within a three days lead time. The
ordering and related cost is 8 per order. The storage cost is 10% per annum of average inventory invest-
ment.
Required:
(i) Calculate Economic Order Quantity.
(ii) Calculate number of orders needed every year.
(iii) Calculate the total cost of ordering and storage bowls for the year.
(iv) Determine when should the next order to be placed. (Assuming that the company does maintain a
safety stock and that the present inventory level is 333 packs with a year of 360 working days.
Answer—
(i) Economic Order Quantity
Annual requirements
E.O.Q.
40,000packs
100orders a year
400 packs
(iii) Ordering an storage costs
( )
Ordering costs :- 100 orders × 8.00 800
Storage cost :- ½ (400 packs × 10% of 40) 800
Total cost of ordering & storage 1,600
(iv) Timing of next order
Units inventory
(Day' s requirement served by an order )
Economic order quantity
333 Packs
3.6 days 3 days requirement
400 packs
(c) Time interval for placing next order
Inventory left for day's requirement - Lead time of delivery 3 days - 3 days = 0 days
This means that next order for the replenishment of supplies has to be placed immediately.
Question 7—
RST Limited has received an offer of quantity discount on its order of materials as under:
Price per ton Order Size (in ton)
9,600 Less than 50
9,360 50 and less than 100
9,120 100 and less than 200
8,880 200 and less than 300
8,640 300 and above
The annual requirement for the material is 500 tons. The ordering cost per order is 12,500 and the stock
holding cost is estimated at 25% of the material cost per annum.
Required
(i) Compute the most economical purchase level.
(ii) Compute EOQ if there are no quantity discounts and the price per ton is 10,500.
Solution—
2 40,000kgs. 100
3. EOQ 2,000kgs.
2
4. Total cost of procurement and storage when the order size is equal to EOQ or 2,000 kg. No. of
orders (40,000 kg. ÷ 2,000 kg.) = 20 times
Ordering cost (20 orders × 100) = 2,000
Carrying cost ( )(½ × 2,000 kg. × 2) = 2,000
Total cost 4,000
(i) Re-order point = Safety stock + Lead time consumption
40,000 kg.
= 1,000 kg. 36 days
360 days
= 1,000 kg. + 4,000 kg. = 5,000 kg.
(ii) Statement showing the total cost of procurement and storage of raw materials
(after considering the discount)
Order No. of Total cost of Average Total cost of Discount Total co st
size orders procurement stock storage of
raw
materials
Kg. ( ) Kg. ( ) ( ) ( )
(1) (2) (3)=(2)× 100 (4)=½×( (5)=(4)× 2 (6) (7)=[(3)+(5)–
1) (6)
40,000 1 100 20,000 40,000 4,000 36,100
20,000 2 200 10,000 20,000 3,200 17,000
10,000 4 400 5,000 10,000 2,000 8,400
6666.66 6 600 3,333 6,666 400 6,866
(iii) Number of orders which the company should place to minimize the costs after taking EOQ also into
consideration is 20 orders each of size 2,000 kg. The total cost of procurement and storage in this
case comes to 4,000, which is minimum.
(Refer to working notes 3 and 4)
2,500 50 units
2. Prices with discount for different order size
5% Discount = 30 – 5% = 28.50
10% Discount = 30 – 10% = 27.00
12% Discount = 30 – 12%= 26.40
Statement of Computing Total Cost at various order sizes
1
= ( 4,396kg. 1,950) 3,173kg.
2
Or
1
= Minimum level ROQ
2
1
= 1,950 kg. 1,196 kg. 2,548 kg.
2
Working Note
Annual consumption of raw material (A) = (275kg. × 52 weeks) = 14,300 kg.
cost of placing an order (O) = 100
Carrying cost per kg. Per annum (c×i) = 10 × 20% = 2
2AO
Economic order quantity (ECQ)
Ci
2AO
(i) Re-order quantity
Ci
60,000 units
600 ( 10days)
300 days
= 600 + 2,000
= 2,600 units
(iii) Maximum Stock Level = E.O.Q (Re-order Quantity) + Safety Stock
= 8,000 units + 600 units
= 8,600 units
(iv) Average Stock Level = Minimum Stock level + ½ Re-order Quantity
1
600 * 8,000 units
2
= 4,600 units
Or
60,000 units
2,600 – ( 10 days)
300 days
= 2,600 – 2,000
= 600 units
Or
Minimum Stock Level = Safety Stock level = 600 units
18,200 kg.
20kg. 8 days 560kg.
364 days
(iv) Minimum consumption per day of raw material 'Dee':
Average Consumption per day = 50 Kg.
Hence, Maximum Consumption per day = 50 kg. + 20 kg. = 70 kg.
So Minimum consumption per day will be
8 days
Or, Minimum lead time 4 days
2
Putting this Minimum lead time value in (i), we get
Maximum lead time = 4 days + 4 days = 8 days
(i) Maximum consumption per day:
Re-order level = Max. Re-order period × Maximum Consumption per day
1,60,000 units = 8 days × Maximum Consumption per day
1,60,000 units
Or, Maximum Consumption per day 20,000 units
8 days
(ii) Minimum Consumption per day:
Maximum stock level =
Re-order level + Re-order Quantity – (Min. lead time × Min. Consumption per day)
Or, 1,90,000 units = 1,60,000 units + 90,000 units – (4 days × Min. Consumption per day) Or, 4 days
60,000 units
Or, Minimum Consumption per day 15,000 units
4 days
Question 15—
Re-order quantity of material 'X' is 5,000 kg.; Maximum level 8,000 kg.; Minimum usage 50 kg. per hour;
minimum re-order period 4 days; daily working hours in the factory is 8 hours. You are required to
calculate the re-order level of material 'X'.
Answer—
Maximum Level = Re-order level + Re-order Quantity – (Min. usage × Min. Re-order Period)
Re-order Level = Maximum Level – [Re-order Quantity – (Min. usage × Min. Re-order Period)
= 8,000 kg. – [5,000 kg. – (400 kg* × 4 days)] = 8,000 kg. – 3,400 kg. = 4,600 kg.
Hence, Re-order level is 4,600 kg.
*Minimum usage per day = 50 kg. × 8 hours = 400 kg.
Question 16—
A company uses three raw materials A, B and C for a particular product for which the following data apply
:—
Raw Usage per Re- Price Deliv ery period (in Re- Minimum
Material unit of order per weeks) order level
product Quantity Kg. Minimum Average Maximum level (Kg.)
(Kg.) (Kg.) (`) (Kg.)
Weekly production varies from 175 to 225 units, averaging 200 units of the said product. What would be the
following quantities:-
(i) Minimum Stock of A?
(ii) Maximum Stock of B?
(iii) Re-order level of C?
(iv) Average stock level of A?
Answer—
(i) Minimum stock of A
Re-order level - (Average consumption × Average time required to obtain delivery)
= 8,000 kg. - (200 units × 10 kg. × 2 weeks) = 4,000 kg.
(ii) Maximum stock of B
Re-order level - (Min. Consumption × Min. Re-order period) + Re-order quantity
= 4,750 kg. - (175 units × 4 kg. × 3 weeks) + 5,000 kg.
Question19—
Prepare a Store Ledger Account from the following transactions of XY Company Ltd. April, 2014
1 Opening balance 200 units @ 10 per unit.
Question 20—
Wholesale Farmers
Market
Mustard:
Minimum Quantity to be purchased Any quantity 13,50,000 kg.
Purchase price per kg. ( ) 15.00 12.50
Central Sales Tax (CST)* 2% –
Transportation cost per purchase 6,000 15,000
Sorting and piling cost per purchase – 1,200
Loading cost per 50 kg. 10.00 5.00
Unloading cost per 50 kg. 2.00 2.00
Soybean:
Minimum Quantity to be purchased Any Quantity 2,70,000 kg.
Purchase price per kg. (`) 11.00 9.00
Value Added Tax (VAT)** 4% –
Transportation cost per purchase 9,000 12,000
Sorting and piling cost per purchase – 800
Loading cost per 50 kg. 10.00 3.00
Unloading cost per 50 kg. 2.00 2.00
Olive:
Minimum Quantity to be purchased Any Quantity 1,62,000 kg.
Purchase Price per kg. ( ) 36.00 28.00
Import duty** – 10%
Transportation Cost per purchase ( ) 3,000 11,000
Sorting and piling cost per purchase 1,800 –
Loading Cost per 50kg. 10.00 25.00
Unloading cost per 50 kg. 2.00 2.00
The company is paying 12.5% p.a. as interest to its bank for cash credit facility and 100 per 100 kg. as rent
to the warehouse.
[*CST will be added with the purchase price of mustards; **VAT will not be added with the purchase price
of soybeans; ***Import duty will be added with the purchase price of olives.]
You are required to
(i) Calculate the purchase cost of each material
Olive:
– Interest on cash credit 4.5300 3.9175
( 36.24×12.5%) ( 31.34×12.5%)
– Warehouse rent 1.0000 1.0000
5.5300 4.9175
100
(iii) *Warehouse rent per Kg. 1
100Kg.
Calculation of E.O.Q. for each material under the both options
Wholesale Market (Kg.) Farmers (Kg.)
Mustard 2 27,00,000Kg. 6,000 2 27,00,000Kg. 16,200
2.9425 2.5800
=1,04,933.53 =1,84,138.47
Soybean 2 10,80,000 Kg. 9,000 2 10,80,000Kg. 12,800
2.4050 2.1375
=89,906.40 =1,13,730.98
Olive 2 1,62,000Kg. 4,800 2 1,62,000Kg. 11,000
5.5300 4.9175
=16,769.90 =26,921=34
(iii) Selection of best purchase option for the puchase of Olives
Puchasing Olives direct from the farmers is the best purchase option for the Aditya Agro.
******************
50,000
Output by experienced workers in 50,000 hours 5,000units
60
Output by new recruits = 60% of 5,000 = 3,000 units
Less of output = 5,000 – 3,000 = 2,000 units
Total loss of output = 10,000 + 2,000 = 12,000 units
Contribution per unit = 20% of 180 = 36
Total contribution cost = 36 × 12,000 = 4,30,000
Cost of repairing defective units = 3,000 × 0.2 × 25 = 15,000
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.6
Profit for gone due to labour turnover
( )
Loss of Contribution 4,32,000
Cost of repairing defective units 15,000
Recruitment cost 1,56,340
Training cost 1,13,180
Settlement cost of workers leaving 1,83,480
Profit forgone in 2013–14 9,00,000
B. CALCULATION OF EFFECTIVE HOWLY WAGE RATE,
INCENTIVEFS AND TOTAL EARNINGS
Question 6—
You are given the following information of a worker:
(i) Name of worker : Mr. Roger
(ii) Ticket No. : 002
(iii) Work started : 1-4-14 at 8 a.m.
(iv) Work finished : 5-4-14 at 12 noon
(v) Work allotted : Production of 2,160 units
(vi) Work done and approved : 2,000 units
(vii) Time and units allowed : 40 units per hour
(viii) Wage rate : 25 per hour
(ix) Mr. Roger worked 9 hours a day.
You are required to calculate the remuneration of Mr. Roger on the following basis:
(i) Halsey plan and
(ii) Rowan plan
Answer—
No. of units produced and approved = 2,000 units
Standard time = 40 units per hour
Hourly Wage Rate = 25
2,000 units
Time allowed =
40 units = 50 hours
Question 7—
Mr. Michael executes a piece of work in 120 hours as against 150 hours allowed to him. His hourly
rate is 10 and he gets a dearness allowance @ 30 per day of 8 hours worked in addition to his
wages. You are required to calculate total wages received by Mr. Michael under the following
incentive schemes:
(i) Rowan Premium Plan
Answer—
Time Allowed = 150 hours
Time Taken = 120 hours
Time Saved = 30 hours
Rowan Premium Plan ( )
Normal wages ( 10 × 20 hours) 1,200
120 hours
D.A. for 15 days i.e. ( 30 15 days) 450
8 hours
Time saved
Bonus: Time taken Hourly rate
Time allowed
30 hours
120 hours 10 240
150 hours
Total Wages 1,890
45%
Question 8—
A skilled worker is paid a guaranteed wage rate of 120 per hour. The standard time allowed for a
job is 6 hour. He took 5 hours to complete the job. He is paid wages under Rowan Incentive Plan.
(i) Calculate his effective hourly rate of earnings under Rowan Incentive Plan.
(ii) If the worker is placed under Halsey Incentive Scheme (50%) and he wants to maintain the same
effective hourly rate of earnings, calculate the time in which he should complete the job.
Answer
(i) Effective hourly rate of earnings under Rowan Incentive Plan
Earnings under Rowan Incentive plan =
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.8
Time saved
(Actual time taken × wage rate) Time taken Wage rate
Time allowed
1 hour
= (5 hours × 120) + 5 hours 120
6 hours
= 600 + 100 = 700
Effective hourly rate = 700/5 hours = 140/hour
(ii) Let time taken = X
Earnings under Halsay Scheme
Effective hourly rate
Time Taken
Or, Efffective hourly rate under Rowan Incentive plan =
(Time taken Rate) [50% Rate (Time allowed – Time taken)]
Time Taken
(X 120) [50% 120 (6 – X)]
Or, 140
X
Or, 140X = 120X + 360 – 60X
Or, 80X = 360
360
Or, X 4.5 hours
80
Therefore, to earn effective hourly rate of 140 under Halsey Incentive Scheme worker has to
complete the work in 4.5 hours.
Question 9—
The finishing shop of a company employs 60 direct workers. Each worker is paid 400 as wages per week
of 40 hours. When necessary, overtime is worked up to a maximum of 15 hours per week per worker at
time rate plus one-half as premium. The current output on an average is 6 units per man hour which may be
regarded as standard output. If bonus scheme is introduced, it is expected that the output will increase to 8
units per man hour. The workers will, if necessary, continue to work overtime up to the specified limit
although no premium on incentives will be paid.
The company is considering introduction of either Halsey Scheme or Rowan Scheme of wages incentive
system. The budgeted weekly output is 19,200 units. The selling price is 11 per unit and the direct
material cost is 8 per unit. The variable overheads amount to 0.50 per direct labour hour and the fixed
overhead is 9,000 per week.
Prepare a statement to show the effect on the company's weekly profit of the proposal to introduce (a)
Halsey Scheme, and (b) Rowan Scheme.
Answer—
Working Notes:
1. Total available hours per week 2,400
(60 workers × 40 hours)
2. Total standard hours required to produce 19,200 units 3,200
(19,200 units ÷ 6 units per hour)
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.9
3. Total labour hours required after the 2,400
introduce of bonus scheme to produce 19,200 units
(19,200 units ÷ 8 units per man hour)
4. Time saved in hours 800
(3,200 hours – 2,400 hours)
5. Wage rate per hour ( ) 10
( 400 ÷ 40 hours)
6. Bonus:
(i) Halsey Scheme = ½ × Time saved × Wage rate per hour
= ½×800 hours × 10 = 4,000
Time saved
(ii) Rowan Scheme Time Taken Wage rate per hour
Time allowed
800 hours
2,400 hours 10 6,000
3,200 hours
Statement showing the effect on the company's weekly
present profit by the introduction of Halsey
Present ( ) Halsey ( ) Rowan( )
Sales Revenue:(A) 2,11,200 2,11,200 2,11,200
(19,200 units × 11)
Direct Material Cost (19,200 units × 8) 1,53,600 1,53,600 1,53,600
Direct Wages (Refer to working notes 2 & 3) 32,000 24,000 24,000
(3,200 hrs.× 10) (2,400 hrs. × 10) (2,400 hrs.× 10)
Overtime Premium 4,000 – –
(800 hrs. × 5)
Bonus (Refer to working notes 6(i) &(ii)) – 4,000 6,000
Variable Overheads 1,600 1,200 1,200
(3,200 hr. × 0.50) (2,400 hr. × 0.50) (2,400 hr. × 0.50)
Fixed overheads 9,000 9,000 9,000
Total Cost :(B) 2,00,200 1,91,800 1,93,800
Profit:{(A)– (B)} 11,000 19,400 17,400
Question 10—
'Under the Rowan Premium Bonus system, a less efficient worker can obtain same bonus as a highly
efficient worker.' Discuss with suitable examples
Answer—
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.10
Time Taken
Bonus under Rowan System Time Saved Rate per hour
Time allowed
The statement that under Rowan Premium bonus system, a less efficient worker and a highly efficient
worker can obtain same amount of bonus, can be proved with the help of an example. Let time allowed for
a job is 4 hours and Labour rate per hour is 5.
Case I : Less efficient worker, If time taken = 3 hours.
3 hours
Bonus 1 hour 5 3.75
4 hours
Case II : Highly efficient worker, if time taken = 1 hour
1 hours
Bonus 3 hour 5 3.75
4 hours
So, it can be concluded that under Rowan System, the less efficient worker and highly efficient worker can
get the same bonus.
Question 11—
Two workmen, Andrew and Baker, produce the same product using the same material. Andrew is paid
bonus according to Halsey plan, while Baker is paid bonus according to Rowan plan. The time allowed to
manufacture the product is 100 hours. Andrew has taken 60 hours and Baker has taken 80 hours to com-
plete the product. The normal hourly rate of wages of workman Andrew is 24 per hour. The total earnings
of both the workers are same. Calculate normal hourly rate of wages of workman Baker.
Answer—
Andrew Baker
Time allowed (Hours) 100 100
Time taken (Hours) 60 80
Time saved (Hours) 40 20
Let the rate of wages of the worker Baker's is 'L' per hour
Normal Wages 1,440 80 L
(60 hours × 24) (80 hours × L)
Bonus 480 16L**
Total Earnings 1,920 96L
*Bonus under Halsey System = ½ × Time saved × Rate per hour
= ½ × 40 hours × 24 = 480
Time saved
** Bonus under Rowan System Time worked Rate per hour
Time allowed
20hours
80 hours L 16L
100 hours
According to the problem,
Total earning of Andrew = Total earnings of Baker
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.11
1,920 = 96L
L = 20
Therefore, Hourly rate of wages of Baker is 20 per hour.
Question 12—
Standard Time for a job is 90 hours. The hourly rate of guaranteed wages is 50. Because of the saving in
time a worker A gets an effective hourly rate of wages of 60 under Rowan premium bonus system. For the
same saving in time, calculate the hourly rate of wages a worker B will get under Halsey premium bonus
system assuring 40% to worker.
Answer—
Increase in hourly rate of wages under Rowan Plan is 10 i.e.( 60 – 50)
Time Saved
This is Equal to Rate per hour (Please refer Working Note)
Time Allowed
Time Saved
Or, 50 10
Time Allowed
Time Saved
Or, 50 10
90 hours
Therefroe, Time Saved = 18 hours and Time Taken is 72 hours i.e. (90 hours – 18 hours)
Effective Hourly Rate under Halsey System:
Time Saved = 18 hours
Bonus @40% = 18 hours × 40% × 50 = 360
Total Wages = ( 50 × 72 hours) + 360 = 3960
Effective Hourly Rate = 3,960 ÷ 72 hours = 55
Working Note:
Effective hourly Rate =
Time Taken
(Time Taken Rate per hour) Time Saved Rate per hour
Time Allowed
Time Taken
Time Taken
Time Saved Rate per hour
Or, Time Taken Rate per hour Time Allowed
60
Time Taken Time Taken
Time Saved
Or, 60 – 50 50
Time Allowed
Question 13—
The management of a company wants to formulate an incentive plan for the workers with a view to
increase productivity. The following particulars have been extracted from the books of company:
Piece Wage rate 10
Weekly Working hours 40
Hourly wages rate 40 (guaranteed)
Standard/normal time per unit 15 minutes. Actual output for a week:
Worker A: 176 pieces
Worker B: 140 pieces
Differential piece rate: 80% of piece rate when output below normal and 120% of piece rate when output
above normal.
Under Halsey scheme, worker gets a bonus equal to 50% of Wages of time saved.
Calculate:
(i) Earning of workers under Halsey's and Rowan's premium scheme.
Answer—
Caluation of earnings for workers under different incentive plans:
(i) Halsey's Premium plan:
Worker – A Worker –B
Actual Time taken 40 hours 40 hours
Standard time for actual production 44 hours 35 hours
4hours
( 40 hours 40)
44 hours
Earning 1,745.45 1,600
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.13
Question 14—
What are the main features of Halsey and Rowan method of payment of remuneration? State how Rowan
Scheme is better than Halsey Scheme. Given time allowed of 30 hours for a job and the wage rate of 1.00
per hour, illustrate your answer by assuming your own figure for time taken to do the job.
Solution:
F.A. Halsey, an American engineer, brought out his plan in 1891. The main features of his plan were as
follows:
(i) Time rate is guaranteed.
(ii) Standard time is fixed for the job or operation.
(iii) In case a worker completes the job or operation in less time than allowed time (or standard time) he
is paid a fixed percentage of saving in time, which is usually 50%.
(iv) Under this plan, the employer is benefited to the extent of remaining 50% of time saved. Employer
is not protected against over speeding jobs by workers resulting in waste, damages etc.
Rowan Scheme was introduced by James Rowan in Glasgow in the year 1898. It is similar to Halsey Scheme
but the premium concept here is different. The main features of Rowan Scheme are:
(i) Time rate is guaranteed.
(ii) Bonus is based on time saved.
(iii) Instead of fixed percentage of time saved, bonus is in proportion of time saved to time allowed.
(iv) Protects employer against loose rate setting.
(v) Employer shares the benefit of increased output.
The Rowan Scheme is better than Halsey Scheme because of the following reasons:
(i) In Halsey Scheme, bonus is set at 50% of time saved. It does not serve as a strong incentive. If
workers over speed, the quality of the products deteriorates.
(ii) In Rowan Scheme, there is an automatic check on the earnings and thus over speeding is arrested.
In Halsey Scheme if two third of the time is saved, the worker can double his earning per hour and
in Rowan Scheme, this is not possible.
(iii) The earning per hour in Rowan Scheme is higher upto 50% of time saved and falls thereafter whereas
in Halsey Scheme the earnings per hour increases at a slow speed and can be doubled.
Consider the following example in which the time allowed for performing the job is 30 hours and the wage
rate is 1.00 per hour. We will depict with the help of imaginary figures in the following example, how the
earnings per hour under Halsey and Rowan plan will vary.
Question 15—
Jigyasa Boutiques LLP. (JBL) takes contract on job works basis. It works for various fashion houses and
retail stores. It has employed 26 workers and pays them on time rate basis. On an average an employee is
allowed 2 hours for boutique work on a piece of garment. In the month of March 2014, two workers
Margaret and Jennifer were given 30 pieces and 42 pieces of garments respectively for boutique work. The
following are the details of their work:
Margaret Jennifer
Work assigned 30 pcs. 42 pcs.
Time taken 28 hours 40 hours
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.14
Workers are paid bonus as per Halsey System. The existing rate of wages is 50 per hour. As per the new
wages agreement the workers will be paid 55 per hour w.e.f. 1st April 2014. At the end of the month March
2014, the accountant of the company has calculated wages to these two workers taking 55 per hour.
(i) From the above information calculate the amount of loss that the company has incurred due to
incorrect rate selection.
(ii) What would be the loss incurred by the JBL due to incorrect rate selection if it had followed Rowan
scheme of bonus payment.
(iii) Amount that could have been saved if Rowan scheme of bonus payment was followed.
(iv) Do you think Rowan scheme of bonus payment is suitable for JBL?
Answer—
Margarte Jennifer
No. of Garmetns assigned 30 42
Hows Allowed per piece (Hours) 2 2
Total Howrs Allowed (Hows) 60 84
Hours Taken (Hours) 28 40
Hows Sarved (Hours) 32 44
Time Taken 28 40
Time Saved Excess Rate 32 5 44 5
Time Allowed 60 84
Excess Wages Paid 214.67 304.76 519.43
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.15
(iii) Calculation of amount that could have been saved if Rowan Scheme were followed
Margaret ( ) Jennifer ( ) Total ( )
Wages paid under Halsey Scheme 220.00 310.00 530.00
Wages paid under Rowan Scheme 214.67 304.76 519.43
Difference (Savings) 5.33 5.24 10.57
(iv) Rowan Scheme of incentive payment has the following benefits, which is suitable with the nature
of business in which Jigyasa Boutique LLP operates:
(a) Under Rowan Scheme of bonus payment, workers cannot increase their earnings or bonus
by merely increasing its work speed. Bonus under Rowan Scheme is maximum when the
time taken by a worker on a job is half of the time allowed. As this fact is known to the
workers, therefore, they work at such a speed which helps them to maintain the quality of
output too.
(b) If the rate setting department commits any mistake in setting standards for time to be taken
to complete the works, the loss incurred will be relatively low.
Question 16—
The existing Incentive system of Alpha Limited is as under:
Normal Working Week 5 days of 8 hours each plus 3 late shifts of 3 hours each
Rate of Payment Day work: 160 per hour
Late shift: 225 per hour
Average output per operator for 49-hours week 120 articles
i.e. including 3 late shifts
In order to increase output and eliminate overtime, it was decided to switch on to a system of payment by
results. The following information is obtained.
Time-rate (as usual) : 160 per hour
Basic time allowed for 15 articles: 5 hours
Piece-work rate : Add 20% to basic piece-rate
Premium bonus : Add 50% to time.
Required:
(i) Prepare a Statement showing hours worked, weekly earnings, number of articles produced and
labour cost per article for one operator under the following systems:
(a) Existing time-rate
(b) Straight piece-work
(c) Rowan system
(d) Halsey premium system
Assume that 135 articles are produced in a 40-hour week under straight piece work, Rowan Pre-
mium system, and Halsey premium system above and worker earns half the time saved under Halsey pre-
mium system.
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.16
Answer—
Table showing Labour Cost per Article
Method of Payment Hours Weekly Number Labour cost
worked earnings of per article
( ) articles ( )
produced
Existing time rate (WN-1) 49 8,425.00 120 70.21
Straight piece rate system (WN-2) 40 8,640.00 135 64.00
Rowan Premium System (WN-3) 40 9,007.41 135 66.72
Halsey Premium System (WN-4) 40 8,600.00 135 63.70
Working Notes:
1. Existing Time Rate
Weekly wages:
Normal Shift (40 hours × 160) 6400
Late shift (9 hours × 225) 2,025
8425
2. Piece Rate System
15 articles are produced in 5 hours
5 hours
Therefore, to produce 135 articles, hours required is 135 articles 45 hours
15 articles
Cost of producing 135 articles:
At basic time rate (45 hours × 160) = 7,200
Add: Bonus @20% on basic Piece Rate
7,200
20% 135articles 1,440
135 articles
Earning for the week 8640
3. Rowan Premium System
5 hours
(i) Time allowed for producing 135 articles 135articles 150 % 67.5 hours
15 articles
(ii) Time taken to produce 135 articles = 40.0 hours
(iii) Time saved = 27.5 hours
Earnings under Rowan Premium system:
Time saved
=(Time taken + Rate per hour) + Time taken Rate per hour
Time allowed
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.17
27.5 hours
(40 hours 160) 40 hours 160 9007.41
67.5 hours
4. Halsey Premium System
= (Time Taken× Rate per hour) +(½×Time saved × Rate per hour)
= (40 hours × 160) + (½ × 27.5hours× 160)= 6,400 + 2,200 = 8,600
Question 17—
A Company is undecided as to what kind of wage scheme should be introduced. The following particulars
have been compiled in respect of three systems, which are under consideration of the management.
Workers
A B C
Actual hours worked in a week 38 40 34
Hourly rate of wages 6 5 7.20
Production in units
Product – P 21 – 60
Product – Q 36 – 135
Product – R 46 25 –
Standard time allowed per unit of each product is:
P Q R
Minutes 12 18 30
For the purpose of piece rate, each minute is valued at 0.10
You are required to calculate the wages of each worker under:
(i) Guaranteed hourly rates basis
(ii) Premium bonus basis where the worker receives bonus based on Rowan scheme.
Solution:
(i) Computation of wages of each worker under guraranteed hourly rate basis
Question 18—
ZED Limited is working by employing 50 skilled workers, it is considering the introduction of incentive
scheme-either Halsey scheme (with 50% bonus) or Rowan scheme of wage payment for increasing the
labour productivity to cope up the increasing demand for the product by 40%. It is believed that proposed
incentive scheme could bring about an average 20% increase over the present earnings of the workers; it
could act as sufficient incentive for them to produce more.
Because of assurance, the increase in productivity has been observed as revealed by the figures for the
month of April,2014
Hourly rate of wages (guaranteed) 30
Average time for producing one unit by one worker at the previous
performance (This may be taken as time allowed) 1.975 hours
Number of working days in the month 24
Number of working hours per day of each worker 8
Actual production during the month 6,120 units
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.19
Required:
(i) Calculate the effective rate of earnings under the Halsey scheme and the Rowan scheme.
(ii) Calculate the savings to the ZED Limited in terms of direct labour cost per piece.
(iii) Advise ZED Limited about the selection of the scheme to fulfill their assurance.
Answer—
Working notes:
1. Computation of time saved (in hours) per month:
(Standard production time for 6,120 units) – (Actual time taken by the workers)
= (6,120 units × 1.975 hours) – (24 days × 8 hours per day × 50 skilled workers)
= (12,087 hours – 9,600 hours)
= 2,487 hours
2. Computation of bonus for time saved under Halsey and Rowan schemes:
Time Saved = 2,487 hours
(Refer to working note 1)
Wage rate per hour = 30
Bonus under Halsey Scheme = ½ × 2,487 hours × 30
(with 50% bonus) = 37,305
Time saved
Bonus under Rowan Scheme Time taken Rate per hour
Time Allowed
2,487 hours
9,600 hours 30
12,087 hours
= 59,258.38
(i) Computation of effective rate of earnings under the Halsey and Rowan scheme:
Total earnings (under Halsey Scheme) (Refer to working note 2)
Total earnings (under Halsey scheme) (Refer to working note 2)
= Time wages + Bonus
= (24 days × 8 hours x 50 skilled workers × 30) + 37,305
= 2,88,000 + 37,305 = 3,25,305
Total earnings (under Rowan scheme) (Refer to working note 2)
= Time wages + Bonus
= 2,88,000 + 59,258.38
= 3,47,258.38
3,25,305
Effective rate of earnings per hour (under Halsey Plan) 33.89
9,600 hours
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.20
3,47,258.38
Effective rate of earnings per hour (under Rowan Plan) 36.17
9,600 hours
(ii) Savings to the Zed Ltd., in terms of direct labour cost per piece:
( )
Direct labour cost (per unit) under time wages system 59.25
(1.975 hours per unit × 30)
3,25,305
Direct labour cost (per unit) under Halsey Plan 53.15
6,120 units
3,47,258
Direct labour cost (per unit) cunder Rowan Plan 56.74
6,120 units
Saving of direct labour cost under:
Halsey Plan ( 59.25 – 53.15) 6.10
Rowan Plan ( 59.25 – 56.74) 2.51
(iii) Advise to ZED Ltd.: (about the selection of the scheme to fulfill assurance)
Halsey scheme brings more savings to the management of ZED Ltd., over the present earnings of
2,88,000 but the other scheme i.e. Rowan scheme fulfils the promise of 20% increase over the
present earnings of 2,88,000 by paying 20.58% in the form of bonus. Hence Rowan Plan may be
adopted.
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.21
C. Computation of Labour Costing
Question 19—
Two workers 'A' and 'B' produce the same product using the same material. Their normal wage
rate is also the same. 'A' is paid bonus according to Rowan scheme while 'B' is paid bonus according to
Halsey scheme. The time allowed to make the product is 50 hours. 'A' takes 30 hours while 'B' takes 40
hours to complete the product. The factory overhead rate is 5 per person-hour actually worked. The
factory cost of product manufactured by 'A' is 3,490 and for product manufactured by 'B' is 3,600.
Required:
(i) Compute the normal rate of wages.
(ii) Compute the material cost.
(iii) Prepare a statement comparing the factory cost of the product as made by two workers.
Answer—
Workings
1. Let 'M' be the cost of material and 'L' be the normal rate of wages per hour
Worker A ( ) Worker B ( )
Material cost M M
Labour wages 30 L 40 L
Bonus 12 L* 5 L**
Overheads 150 200
(30 hours × 5); (40 hours × 5)
Factory cost
{M + (30 L + 12 L) + 150 = 3,490} M + 42 L = 3,340 ........(i) M + 45 L = 3,400.... (ii)
{M + (40 L + 5 L) + 200 = 3,600}
Time saved
* Bonus uner Rowan system Time worked Rate per hour
Time allowed
20 hours
30 hours L 12L
50 hours
** Bonus under Halsey system
= ½ ×Time saved × Rate per hour
= ½ × 10 hours × L= 5L
2. Solving (i) and (ii) to get the value of 'M' and 'L'
M + 42 L = 3,340......................(i)
M + 45 L = 3,460.......................(ii)
– 3L = –60
L = 20
By substituting the value of 'L' in (i), we will get the value of M
M + 42 × 20 = 3,340 or, M = 2,500
(i) Normal rate of wages is 20 per hour. (working Note – 2)
(ii) Cost of materials = 2,500. (Working Note – 2)
Chapter 3 : Labour Costing 3.22
(iii) Comparative Statement of Factory Cost
Worker A ( ) Worker B ( )
Material cost 2,500 2,500
Wages
(30 hours × 20); (40 hours × 20) 600 800
Bonus
(12 × 20); (5 × 20) 240 100
Overheads
(30 hours × 5); (40 hours × 5) 150 200
Factory cost 3,490 3,600
Question 20—
Calculate the earnings of A and B from the following particulars for a month and allocate the labour cost to
each job X, Y and Z:
A B
(i) Basic Wages 100 160
(ii) Dearness Allowance 50% 50%
(iii) Contribution to provident Fund (on basic wages) 8% 8%
(iv) Contribution to Employees' State Insurance (on basic wages) 2% 2%
(v) Overtime 10 hours
The normal working hours for the month are 200. Overtime is paid at double the total of normal
wages and dearness allowance. Employer's contribution to state Insurance and Provident Fund are at equal
rate with employees' contributions. The two workers were employed on jobs X, Y and Z in the following
proportions:
Jobs
X Y Z
Worker A 40% 30% 30%
**************************
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.1
CHAPTER – 4
Question 1.
ABC Ltd. has three production departments P1, P2 and P3 and two service departments S1 and
S2. The following data are extracted from the records of the Company for the month of October, 2013:
(`)
Rent and rates 62,500
General lighting 7,500
Indirect Wages 18,750
Power 25,000
Depreciation on machinery 50,000
Insurance of machinery 20,000
Other Information:
P1 P2 P3 S1 S2
Direct wages (`) 37,500 25,000 37,500 18,750 6,250
Horse Power of Machines used 60 30 50 10 –
Cost of machinery (`) 3,00,000 4,00,000 5,00,000 25,000 25,000
Floor space (Sq. ft) 2,000 2,500 3,000 2,000 500
Number of light points 10 15 20 10 5
Production hours worked 6,225 4,050 4,100 – –
Expenses of the service departments S1 and S2 are reapportioned as below:
P1 P2 P3 S1 S2
S1 20% 30% 40% – 10%
S2 40% 20% 30% 10% –
Required:
I. Compute overhead absorption rate per production hour of each production department.
II. Determine the total cost of product X which is processed for manufacture in department P1, P2
and P3 for 5 hours, 3 hours and 4 hours respectively, given that its direct material cost is ` 625
and direct labour cost is ` 375.
Answer
Primary Distribution Summary
Item of cost Basis of Total P1 P2 P3 S1 S2
apportionment (`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
Direct wages Actual 25,000 – – – 18,750 6,250
Rent Floor area 62,500 12,500 15,625 18,750 12,500 3,125
and (4 : 5 : 6 : 4 : 1)
Rates
General Light points 7,500 1,250 1,875 2,500 1,250 625
lighting (2 : 3 : 4 : 2 : 1)
Indirect wages Direct wages 18,750 5,625 3,750 5,625 2813 938
(6 : 4 : 6 : 3 : 1)
Power Horse Power of 25,000 10,000 5,000 8,333 1,667
machines used
(6 : 3 : 5 : 1)
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.2
Overheads of service cost centres Let S1 be the overhead of service cost centre S1 and S2 be the overhead
of service cost centre S2.
S1 = 38,380 + 0.10 S2
S2 = 12,338 + 0.10 S1
Substituting the value of S2 in S1 we get
S1 = 38,380 + 0.10 (12,338 + 0.10 S1)
S1 = 38,380 + 1,233.80 + 0.01 S1
0.99 S1 = 39,613.80
S1 = `40,014.
S2 = 12,338 + 0.10 × 40,014.
= `16,339
Secondary Distribution Summary
Particulars Total (`) P1 (`) P2 (`) P3 (`)
Question 2
The following account balances and distribution of indirect charges are taken from the accounts of a
manufacturing concern for the year ending on 31st March, 2014:
Total Production Departments Service
Item Amount Departments
(`) X (`) Y (`) Z (`) A (`) B (`)
Indirect Material 1,25,000 20,000 30,000 45,000 25,000 5,000
Power 1,80,000
Insurance 18,000
Depreciation 2,70,000
The following departmental data are also available:
Production Departments Service Departments
X Y Z A B
Area (Sq. ft.) 4,400 4,000 3,000 2,400 1,200
Answer
Primary Distribution of Overheads
Item Basis Total Production Departments Service
Amount Departments
(`) X (`) Y (`) Z (`) A (`) B (`)
Indirect Material Actual 1,25,000 20,000 30,000 45,000 25,000 5,000
Indirect Labour Actual 2,60,000 45,000 50,000 70,000 60,000 35,000
Superintendent’s Actual 96,000 – – 96,000 – –
Salary
Fuel & Heat Radiator 15,000 1,500 3,000 4,500 3,750 2,250
Sections
{2:4:6:5:3}
Power Kilowatt 1,80,000 52,500 60,000 45,000 22,500 –
Hours
{7:8:6:3:-}
Rent & Rates Area (Sq. ft.) 1,50,000 44,000 40,000 30,000 24,000 12,000
{22:20:15:12
:6}
b = 1,24,184
Secondary Distribution of Overheads
Production Departments
X (`) Y (`) Z (`)
Total overhead as per primary distribution 2,39,000 2,93,000 3,94,500
Service Department A (80% of 1,69,668) 50,900 50,900 33,934
Service Department B (90% of 1,24,184) 31,046 49,674 31,046
Total 3,20,946 3,93,574 4,59,480
Question 3
Arnav Ltd. has three production departments M, N and O and two service departments P and
Q. The following particulars are available for the month of September, 2013:
(`)
Lease rental 35,000
Power & Fuel 4,20,000
Wages to factory supervisor 6,400
Electricity 5,600
Depreciation on machinery 16,100
Depreciation on building 18,000
Payroll expenses 21,000
Canteen expenses 28,000
ESI and Provident Fund Contribution 58,000
Followings are the further details available:
Particulars M N O P Q
Floor space (square meter) 1,200 1,000 1,600 400 800
departments.
Answer:
Primary Distribution Summary
Basis of Total Production Dept. Service Dept.
apportionment
Item of cost M N O P Q
(`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
Lease rental Floor space 35,000 8,400 7,000 11,200 2,800 5,600
5:6:8:2:4
Power & Fuel HP of Machine × 4,20,000 1,26,408 1,95,728 97,864 – –
Working hours
(93: 144:72)
Supervisor's Working hours 6,400 1,964 2,534 1,901 – –
Wages* (31:40:30)
Electricity Light points 5,600 1,470 2,535 1,901 – –
(21:26:16:9:8)
Depreciation Value of machinery 16,100 4,200 3,500 4,900 1,400 2,100
on machinery
Depreciation Floor space 18,000 4,320 3,600 5,760 1,440 2,880
of building (6:5:8:2:4)
Payroll No. of employees 21,000 5,448 5,903 5,108 1,703 2,838
Expenses (48:52:45:15:25)
Canteen No. of Employees 28,000 7265 7,870 6,811 2,270 3,784
Expenses (48: 52:45:15:25)
ESI and PF Direct Wages 58,000 17,244 16,606 15,268 3,593 5,289
contribution (864:832:765:180:26
5)
6,08,100 1,76,719 2,44,562 1,49,932 13,836 23,0 51
distribution
P (90% of `17,557) 15,801 5,267 6,145 4,389
Q (85% of `24,807) 21,086 9,923 6,202 4,961
1,91,909 2,56,909 1,59,282
Overhead rate per hour
M N O
Total overheads cost (`) 1,91,909 2,56,909 1,59,282
Working hours 1,240 1,600 1,200
Rate per hour (`) 154.77 160.57 132.74
Question 4:
A company has three production departments (M1, M2 and A1) and three service department, one of
which Engineering service department, servicing the M1 and M2 only. The relevant information are as
follows:
Product Product
X Y
M1 10 Machine hours 6 Machine hours
M2 4 Machine hours 14 Machine hours
A1 14 Direct Labour hours 18 Direct Labour hours
The annual budgeted overhead cost for the year are
Indirect Wages Consumable
(`) Supplies(`)
M1 46,520 12,600
M2 41,340 18,200
A1 16,220 4,200
(`)
– Depreciation on Machinery 39,600
– Insurance of Machinery 7,200
– Insurance of Building 3,240 (Total building insurance cost for
M1 is one third of annual
premium )
– Power 6,480
– Light 5,400
– Rent 12,675 (The general service deptt. is
located in a building owned by
the company. It is valued at
`6,000 and is changed into cost
at notional value of 8% per
annum. This cost is additional to
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.8
Administrative – 14 400
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.10
Required:
(i) Allocate the support department costs to the sales departments using the direct method.
(ii) Rank the support departments based on percentage of their services rendered to other support
departments. Use this ranking to allocate support costs based on the step-down allocation
method.
(iii) How could you have ranked the support departments differently?
(iv) Allocate the support department costs to two sales departments using the reciprocal allocation
method.
Answer:
(i) Statement showing the allocation of support department costs to the sales departments
(using the Direct Method)
(ii) Ranking of support departments based on percentage of their services rendered to other support
departments
21100
• Administration support department provides 23.077% of its service to
42 28 21
information systems support department. Thus 23.077% of `94510 = `21,810.
400
• Information system support department provides 8.33% 100 of its
2,400 2,000 400
services to Administration support department. Thus 8.33% of `3,04,720 = `25383.
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.11
Statement showing the allocation of support department costs to the sales departments
(Using reciprocal allocation method)
Sales department
Particulars Corporate Consumer
sales sales
(`) (`)
Costs incurred 12,97,751 6,36,818
Re-allocation of cost administrative 56,427 37,614
department (46.16% and 30.77% of
`1,22,243)
Re-allocation of costs of information systems 1,66,467 1,38,734
department (50% and 41.67% of `3,32,934)
Total 15,20,645 8,13,166
Absorption of Overheads
Question 6.
ABC Ltd. manufactures a single product and absorbs the production overheads at a pre-determined rate of
`10 per machine hour.
At the end of financial year 2013-14, it has been found that actual production overheads incurred were
` 6,00,000. It included `45,000 on account of 'written off' obsolete stores and `30,000 being the wages
paid for the strike period under an award.
The production and sales data for the year 2013-14 is as under:
Production:
Finished goods 20,000 units
Work-in-progress (50% complete in all respects) 8,000 units
Sales:
Finished goods 18,000 units
The actual machine hours worked during the period were 48,000. It has been found that one- third of the
under – absorption of production overheads was due to lack of production planning and the rest was
attributable to normal increase in costs.
You are required to:
i. Calculate the amount of under - absorption of production overheads during the year 2013-14; and
ii. Show the accounting treatment of under - absorption of production overheads.
Answer
(i) Amount of under-absorption of production overheads during the year 2013-14
(`)
Total production overheads actually incurred during the year 2013-14 6,00,000
Less: ‘Written off’ obsolete stores ` 45,000
Wages paid for strike period ` 30,000 75,000
Net production overheads actually incurred: (A) 5,25,000
Production overheads absorbed by 48,000 machines hours @ `10 4,80,000
per
hour: (B)
Amount of under-absorption of production overheads: [(A)–(B)] 45,000
(ii) Accounting treatment of under absorption of production overheads: It is given in the
statement of the question that 20,000 units were completely finished and 8,000 units were
50% complete, one third of the under-absorbed overheads were due to lack of production
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.13
Amount Amount
(`) (`)
Total production overheads actually incurred during the 6,79,000
period
Less: Amount paid to worker as per court order 45,000
Expenses of previous year booked in the current year
10,000
Wages paid for the strike period under an award
Obsolete stores written off 42,000
18,000 1,15,000
Less: Production overheads absorbed as per machine
hour rate (48,000 hours × `10.50*) 5,64,000
`10,08,000
Budgeted Machine hour rate (Blanket rate) `10.50 per hour
96,000 hours
Accounting treatment of under absorbed production overheads: As, one fourth of the under absorbed
overheads were due to defective production policies, this being abnormal, hence should be debited to
Costing Profit and Loss Account.
Amount to be debited to Costing Profit and Loss Account = (60,000 * ¼) ` 15,000.
Balance of under absorbed production overheads should be distributed over Works in progress, Finished
goods and Cost of sales by applying supplementary rate*.
Amount to be distributed = (60,000 * ¾) `45,000.
` 45,000
Supplementary rate `1.50 per unit
30,000 units
Apportionment of under absorbed production overheads over WIP, Finished goods and Cost of sales:
Equivalent Amount (`)
completed units
Work-in-Progress (16,000 units × 50% ×1.50) 8,000 12,000
Finished goods (4,000 units × 1.50) 4,000 6,000
Cost of sales (18,000 units × 1.50) 18,000 27,000
Total 30,000 45,000
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.16
Question 9
Your company uses a historical cost system and applies overheads on the basis of "pre- determined" rates.
The following are the figure from the Trial Balance as at 30th September, 2013:-
Manufacturing overheads ` 4,26,544 Dr.
Manufacturing overheads applied ` 3,65,904 Cr.
Work-in-progress ` 1,41,480 Dr.
Finished goods stocks ` 2,30,732 Dr.
Cost of goods sold ` 8,40,588 Dr.
Give two methods for the disposal of the unabsorbed overheads and show the profit implications of each
method.
Answer
Calculation of manufacturing overhead under absorbed (`)
Actual overheads 4,26,544
Overhead recovered (applied) 3,65,904
Under absorption (recovery) of overhead 60,640
The two methods for the disposal of the under-absorbed overheads in this problem may be:–
i. Write off the under - absorbed overhead to Costing Profit & Loss Account.
ii. Use supplementary rate, to recover the under-absorbed overhead.
According to first method, the total unabsorbed overhead amount of `60,640 will be written off to
Costing Profit & Loss Account. The use of this method will reduce the profits of the concern by ` 60,640
for the period.
According to second method, a supplementary rate may be used to adjust the overhead cost of each cost
unit. The under-absorbed amount in total may, at the end of the accounting period, be apportioned on ratio
basis to the three control accounts, viz, Work-in-progress, Finished goods stock and Cost of goods sold
account. Apportioning of under-absorbed overhead can be carried out by using direct labour hours/
machine hours/ the value of the balances in each of these accounts, as the basis. Prorated figures of
under-absorbed overhead over Work-in-progress, Finished goods stock and Cost of goods sold in this
question on the basis of values, of the balances in each of these accounts are as follows:-
` 60,640
#Overhead to be absorbed by cost of goods sold 8,40,588 ` 42,029
`12,12,800
Question 10
A machine costing ` 10 lakhs, was purchased on 1-4-2014. The expected life of the machine is 10
years. At the end of this period its scrap value is likely to be `10,000. The total cost of all the machines
including new one was ` 90 lakhs.
The other information is given as follows:
i. Working hours of the machine for the year was 4,200 including 200 non-productive hours.
ii. Repairs and maintenance for the new machine during the year was ` 5,000.
iii. Insurance Premium was paid for all the machine ` 9,000.
iv. New machine consumes 8 units of electricity per hour, the rate per unit being ` 3.75
v. The new machine occupies 1/10th area of the department. Rent of the department is ` 2,400 per
month.
vi. Depreciation is charged on straight line basis.
Compute machine hour rate for the new machine.
Answer
Computation of machine hour rate of new Machine
1 2,880
II. Rent ` 2,400 12 months
10
3,880 0.97*
B. Machine Expenses
I. Repairs and Maintenance (`5,000÷4,000 hours) 1.25
Question 11
From the details furnished below you are required to compute a comprehensive machine-hour rate:
Original purchase price of the machine `3,24,000
(subject to depreciation at 10% per annum on original cost)
Normal working hours for the month 200 hours
(The machine works for only 75% of normal capacity)
Wages to Machine-man ` 125 per day (of 8 hours)
Wages to Helper (machine attendant) ` 75 per day (of 8 hours)
Power cost for the month for the time worked ` 15,000
Supervision charges apportioned for the machine centre
for the month ` 3,000
Electricity & Lighting for the month ` 7,500
Repairs & maintenance (machine) including Consumable stores per month ` 17,500
Answer:
Effective Machine hour for four-week period
= Total working hours - unproductive set-up time
= {(48 hours × 4 weeks) – {(4 hours × 4 weeks)}
= (192 – 16) hours ) =176 hours.
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.20
(i) Computation of cost of running one machine for a four week period
(`) (`)
(A) Standing Charges (per annum)
Rent 5,400.00
Heat and Light 9,720.00
Forman's salary 12,960.00
Other miscellaneous Expenditure 18,000.00
Standing Charges (per annum) 46,080.00
Total Expenses for one machine for four week period 1,181.54
` 46,080
3 machines 13 four – week period
Wages (48 hours ×4 weeks ×`20 × 3 operators 11,520.00
Bonus {(176 hours ×`20 ×3operators)×10%} 1,056.00
Total Standing Charges 13,757.54
(B) Machine Expenses
1 400.00
Depreciation ` 52,000 10
13four – week period
Repairs and maintenance (`60× 4 weeks) 240.00
Consumable stores (`75 × 4 weeks) 300.00
Power (176 hours × 20 units ×`0.80) 2,816.00
Total machine expenses 3,756.00
(C) Total Expenses (A) + (B) 17,513.54
`17,513.54
(ii) Machine hour rate `99.51
176 hours
Question 13
In a factory, a machine is considered to work for 208 hours in a month. It includes maintenance time of
8 hours and set up time of 20 hours.
The expense data relating to the machine are as under:
Cost of the machine is ` 5,00,000. Life 10 years. Estimated scrap value at the end of life is `
20,000.
(`)
– Repairs and maintenance per annum 60,480
– Consumable stores per annum 47,520
– Rent of building per annum (The machine under reference 72,000
occupies 1/6 of the area)
– Supervisor's salary per month (Common to three machines) 6,000
– Wages of operator per month per machine 2,500
– General lighting charges per month allocated to the machine 1,000
– Power 25 units per hour at ` 2 per unit
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.21
Power is required for productive purposes only. Set up time, though productive, does not require power.
The Supervisor and Operator are permanent. Repairs and maintenance and consumable stores vary with
the running of the machine.
Required
Calculate a two-tier machine hour rate for (a) set up time, and (b) running time
Answer
Working Notes:
(1) (i) Effective hours for standing charges (208 hours - 8 hours) = 200 hours
(ii) Effective hours for variable costs (208 hours - 28 hours) = 180 hours
(2) Standing Charges per hour
Cost per month (`) Cost per hour (`)
(Cost per month ÷
200 hours)
` 6,000 2,000 10.00
Supervisor's Salary
3 machines
1 `72,000 1,000 5.00
Rent of building
6 12 months
General Lighting 1,000 5.00
Total Standing Charges 4,000 20.00
(3) Machine Running Expenses Per Hour
Cost per month (`) Cost per hour
(`)
Depreciation 4,000 20.00
` (5,00,000 – 20,000) 1 ` 4,000
10 years 12 months 200 hours
Wages 2,500 12.50
` 2,500
200 hours
Repairs & Maintenance 5,040 28.00
` 60,480 `50,40
12 months 180 hours
Consumable 3,960 22.00
` 47,520
12 months
Power (25 units ×`2×180 hours) 9,000 50.00
Total Machine Expenses 24,500 132.50
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.22
Question 14
A manufacturing unit has purchased and installed a new machine of ` 12,70,000 to its fleet of 7
existing machines. The new machine has an estimated life of 12 years and is expected to realise `
70,000 as scrap at the end of its working life. Other relevant data are as follows:
(i) Budgeted working hours are 2,592 based on 8 hours per day for 324 days. This includes 300 hours
for plant maintenance and 92 hours for setting up of plant.
(ii) Estimated cost of maintenance of the machine is `25,000 p.a.
(iii) The machine requires a special chemical solution, which is replaced at the end of each week
(6 days in a week) at a cost of `400 each time.
(iv) Four operators control operation of 8 machines and the average wages per person amounts to `420
per week plus 15% fringe benefits.
(v) Electricity used by the machine during the production is 16 units per hour at a cost of ` 3 per unit.
No electricity is consumed during unproductive maintenance and setting up time.
(vi) Departmental and general works overhead allocated to the operation during last year was
` 50,000. During the current year it is estimated to increase by 10% of this amount.
Calculate machine hour rate, if (a) setting up time is unproductive; (b) setting up time is productive.
Answer
Working Note
1. Effective machine hour when set-up time is unproductive:
= Budgeted working hours - (Maintenance time + Setting-up time)
= [2,592 - (300 + 92)] hours. = 2,200 hours.
2. Effective machine hour when set-up time is productive:
= Budgeted working hours - maintenance time
= (2,592 - 300) hours. = 2,292 hours.
3. Operators' wages per annum
Basic wages (4 operators × `420 × 54 weeks) = ` 90,720
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.23
`1,04,328 1 5.93
;
8 machines 2, 200 hours
`1,04,328 1 5.69
8 machines 2,292 hours
Departmental and General overhead 55,000
(50,000 × 110%)
`55,000 1 3.13
;
8 machines 2,200 hours
`55,000 1 3.00
8 machines 2,292 hours
(A) 1,59,328 9.06 8.69
Machine Expenses
Depreciation 1,00,000
`1,00,000 `1,00,000 45.45 46.63
;
2,200 hours 2,292 hours
Electricity (16 units × `3) 48.00 48.00
Special Chemical Solution 21,600
` 21,600 ` 21,600 9.82 9.42
;
2, 200 hours 2, 292 hours
Maintenance
` 25,000 ` 25,000 25,000 11.36 10.91
;
2,200 hours 2,292 hours
(B) 114.63 111.96
Machine Hour Rate (A+B) 123.69 120.65
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.24
Question 15.
You are given the following information of the three machines of a manufacturing department of X Ltd.:
Preliminary estimates of expenses (per
annum)
Machin
Total (`) es
A (`) B (`) C (`)
Depreciation 20,000 7,500 7,500 5,000
Spare parts 10,000 4,000 4,000 2,000
Power 40,000
Consumable stores 8,000 3,000 2,500 2,500
Insurance of machinery 8,000
Indirect labour 20,000
Building maintenance expenses 20,000
Annual interest on capital outlay 50,000 20,000 20,000 10,000
Monthly charge for rent and rates 10,000
Salary of foreman (per month) 20,000
Salary of Attendant (per month) 5,000
(The foreman and the attendant control all the three machines and spend equal time on them.) The
following additional information is also available:
Machines
A B C
Estimated Direct Labour Hours 1,00,000 1,50,000 1,50,000
Ratio of K.W. Rating 3 2 3
Floor space (sq. ft.) 40,000 40,000 20,000
There are 12 holidays besides Sundays in the year, of which two were on Saturdays. The manufacturing
department works 8 hours in a day but Saturdays are half days. All machines work at 90% capacity
throughout the year and 2% is reasonable for breakdown.
You are required to :
Calculate predetermined machine hour rates for the above machines after taking into consideration the
following factors:
An increase of 15% in the price of spare parts.
An increase of 25% in the consumption of spare parts for machine 'B' & 'C' only.
20% general increase in wages rates.
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.25
Answer
Computation of Machine Hour Rate
Basis of Machines
apportionment Total A (`) B (`) C (`)
(`)
(A) Standing Charges
Depreciation 8,000 3,000 3,000 2,000
Insurance
Basis (3:3:2)
Indirect Labour Direct Labour 24,000 6,000 9,000 9,000
(2:3:3)
Building Floor Space 20,000 8,000 8,000 4,000
maintenance (2:2:1)
expenses
Rent and Rates Floor Space 1,20,000 48,000 48,000 24,000
(2:2:1)
Salary of foreman Equal 2,40,000 80,000 80,000 80,000
Salary of attendant Equal 60,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Total standing charges 4,72,000 1,65,000 1,68,000 1,39,000
Hourly rate for standing charges 84.70 86.24 71.36
(B) Machine
Expenses:
Depreciation Direct 20,000 7,500 7,500 5,000
Spare parts Final estimates 13,225 4,600 5,750 2,875
Power K.W. 40,000 15,000 10,000 15,000
rating
(3:2:3)
Consumable Stores Direct 8,000 3,000 2,500 2,500
Total Machine expenses 81,225 30,100 25,750 25,375
Hourly Rate for Machine expenses 15.45 13.22 13.03
Total (A + B) 553,225 1,95,100 1,93,750 1,64,375
Machine Hour rate 100.15 99.46 84.38
Working Notes:
Calculation of effective working hours:
No. of full off-days = No. of Sunday + No. of holidays
= 52 + 12 = 64 days
No. of half working days = 52 days – 2 holidays = 50 days
No. of full working days = 365 days – 64 days – 50 days = 251 days
Total working Hours = {(251 days × 8 hours) + (50 days × 4 hours)}
= 2,008 hours + 200 = 2,208 hours.
Total effective hours = Total working hours × 90% – 2% for break-down
= 2,208 hours × 90% - 2% (2,208 hours × 90%)
= 1,987.2 hours – 39.74 hours
= 1947.46 or Rounded up to 1948 hours.
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.26
(`)
Preliminary estimates 20,000
Add: Increase in wages @ 20% 4,000
24,000
(iv) Interest on capital outlay is a finance cost, therefore it has been excluded from the cost
accounts.
Question 16.
M.L. Auto Ltd. is a manufacturer of auto components and the details of its expenses for the year 2014
are given below:
(`)
(i) Opening Stock of Material 1,50,000
(ii) Closing Stock of Material 2,00,000
(iii) Purchase of Material 18,50,000
(iv) Direct Labour 9,50,000
(v) Factory Overhead 3,80,000
(vi) Administrative Overhead 2,50,400
During 2015, the company has received an order from a car manufacturer where it estimates that the cost
of material and labour will be ` 8,00,000 and ` 4,50,000 respectively. M.L. Auto Ltd. charges factory
overhead as a percentage of direct labour and administrative overhead as a percentage of factory cost
based on previous year's cost.
Cost of delivery of the components at customer's premises is estimated at ` 45,000.
You are required to:
(i) Calculate the overhead recovery rates based on actual costs for 2014.
(ii) Prepare a detailed cost statement for the order received in 2015 and the price to be quoted if the
company wants to earn a profit of 10% on sales.
Answer:
(i) Calculation of Overhead Recovery Rate:
Factory Overhead in 2014
Factory Overhead Recovery Rate 100
Direct Labour Costs in 2014
`3,80,000
100 40% of Direct Labour
`9,50,000
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.27
Detailed Cost Statement for the Order received from M.L. Auto Ltd. during 2015
Hence the price to be quoted is `17,66,000 if the company wants to earn a profit of 10% on sales.
Question 17
In a manufacturing company factory overheads are charged as fixed percentage basis on direct labour
and office overheads are charged on the basis of percentage of factory cost. The following information
are available related to the year ending 31st March, 2014:
Product A Product B
Direct Materials ` 19,000 ` 15,000
Question 18.
Maximum production capacity of JK Ltd. is 5,20,000 units per annum. Details of estimated cost of
production are as follows:
Direct material ` 15 per unit.
Direct wages ` 9 per unit (subject to a minimum of ` 2,50,000 per month).
Fixed overheads ` 9,60,000 per annum.
Variable overheads ` 8 per unit.
Semi-variable overheads are ` 5,60,000 per annum up to 50 per cent capacity and additional `1,50,000
per annum for every 25 per cent increase in capacity or a part of it.
JK Ltd. worked at 60 per cent capacity for the first three months during the year 2013-14, but it is
expected to work at 90 per cent capacity for the remaining nine months.
The selling price per unit was ` 44 during the first three months.
You are required, what selling price per unit should be fixed for the remaining nine months to yield a
total profit of `15,62,500 for the whole year.
Answer:
Statement of Cost and Sales for the year 2013-14
(Maximum production capacity = 5,20,000 units per annum)
Particulars First 3 months Next 9 months Total
Capacity utilized 60% 90%
Production 5,20,000 3 60% 5,20,000 9 90% 4,29,000 units
12 12
= 78,000 units = 3,51,000 units
(`) (`) (`)
Direct materials @ 15 per unit 11,70,000 52,65,000 64,35,000
Direct wages @ 9 per unit or 7,50,000 31,59,000 39,09,000
`2,50,000 per month whichever is
higher
Prime Cost (A) 19,20,000 84,20,000 1,03,44,000
Overheads
Fixed 2,40,000 7,20,000 9,60,000
Variable @ `8 per unit 6,24,000 28,08,000 34,32,000
Semi Variable (Refer to working 1,77,500 6,45,000 8,22,500
Note-1)
Total overheads (B) 10,41,500 41,73,000 52,14,500
Total Cost (C) [(A+B)] 29,61,500 1,25,97,000 1,55,58,500
Profit during first 3 months (Bal. 4,70,500
Figure)
Sales @ `44 per unit (78,000 ×`44) 34,32,000
Desired profit during next 9 months 10,92,000
(`15,62,500 – `4,70,500) (D)
Sales required for next 9 months 1,36,89,000
---------------- (E) [(C+D)]
Total Profit 15,62,500
Total Sales 1,71,21,000
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.30
Required
(i) Allocate the power plant's cost to the cutting and the welding department using a single rate method
in which the budgeted rate is calculated using practical capacity and costs are allocated based on
actual usage.
(ii) Allocate the power plant's cost to the cutting and welding departments, using the dual - rate method
in which fixed costs are allocated based on practical capacity and variable costs are allocated based
on actual usage.
(iii) Allocate the power plant's cost to the cutting and welding departments using the dual- rate method
in which the fixed-cost rate is calculated using practical capacity, but fixed costs are allocated to
the cutting and welding department based on actual usage. Variable costs are allocated based on
actual usage.
(iv) Comment on your results in requirements (i), (ii) and (iii).
Answer
Working Notes:
Fixed practical capacity cost per machine hour:
Practical capacity (machine hours) 1,50,000
Practical capacity fixed costs (`) 9,00,000
Fixed practical capacity cost per machine hour `6
(`9,00,000 ÷ 1,50,000 hours)
Budgeted rate per machine hour (using practical capacity):
= Fixed practical capacity cost per machine hour + Budgeted variable cost per machine hour
= ` 6 + ` 4 = `10
Chapter 4 : Overhead - Absorption Costing Method 4.31
(i) Statement showing Power Plant's cost allocation to the Cutting & Welding departments by
using single rate method on actual usage of machine hours.
(ii) Statement showing Power Plant's cost allocation to the Cutting & Welding departments by
using dual rate method.
Cutting Welding Total
Department Department
(`) (`) (`)
Fixed Cost 5,40,000 3,40,000 9,00,000
(Allocated on practical
`9,00,000 3 `9,00,000 2
capacity for each department
i.e.): 5 5
Question 20
In the current quarter, a company has undertaken two jobs. The data relating to these jobs are as under:
Since the total cost of jobs 1102 and 1108 are equal to `99,375 and `1,41,000 respectively, therefore we
have the following equations (Refer to Working Note 1)
(67,500 + 30,000 F) (1 + A) = 99,375…………………….….(i)
(96,000 + 42,000 F) (1 + A) = 1,41,000…………………..…(ii)
Or 67,500 + 30,000 F + 67,500 A + 30,000 FA = 99,375
Or 96,000 + 42,000 F + 96,000 A + 42,000 FA = 1,41,000
Or 30,000 F + 67,500 A + 30,000 FA = 31,875 .....................................(iii)
42,000 F + 96,000 A + 42,000 FA = 45,000 ...................................... (iv)
On solving (iii) and (iv) we get : A
On solving (iii) and (iv) we get : A = 0.25 and F = 0.40
Hence, A = 25% and F = 40%
(ii) Selling price of the new order:
(`)
Direct materials 64,000
Direct wages 50,000
Prime cost 1,14,000
Factory overheads (40% × `50,000) 20,000
Factory cost 1,34,000
Selling & Administration overheads (25% × `1,34,000) 33,500
Total cost 1,67,500
If selling price of new order is `100 then Profit is `20 and Cost is `80
`1,67,500
Hence selling price of the new order 100 ` 2,09,375
80
************************
Chapter 7 : Cost Accounting System 7.1
A. Problems On Non-Integrated Accounting System
Question 1—
Pass journal entries in the cost books, maintained on non-integrated system, for the following:
Answer—
Journal Entries in Cost Books
Maintained on Non-integrated System
Dr.( ) Cr.( )
(i) Work-in-Progress Ledger control A/c Dr. 5,50,000
Factory Overhead Control A/c Dr. 1,50,000
To Stores Ledger Control A/c 7,00,000
(Being issue of materials)
(ii) Work-in Progress Ledger Control A/c Dr. 2,00,000
Factory Overhead Control A/c Dr. 40,000
To Wages Control A/c 2,40,000
(Being Allocation of Wages and Salaries)
(i) Factory Overhead Control A/c Dr. 20,000
To Costing Profit & Loss A/c 20,000
(Being Transfer of over absorpiton of Overhead)
Costing Profit & Loss A/c Dr. 10,000
To Administration Overhead Control A/c 10,000
Question 2—
A Company operates separate cost accounting and financial accounting systems. The following is the list of
opening balances as on 1.04.2013 in the Cost Ledger.
Debit( ) Credit( )
Stores Ledger Control Account 53,375 –
2,56,000 2,56,000
Trial Balance (As on 30.06.2013)
Dr. ( ) Cr. ( )
Stores ledger control A/c 39,175
WIP control A/c 1,12,095
Finished goods control A/c 28,880
To General ledger adjustment A/c 1,80,150
1,80,150 1,80,150
Question 3—
As of 31st March, 2014, the following balances existed in a firm's cost ledger, which is maintained separately
on a double entry basis:
Debit( ) Credit( )
Stores Ledger Control A/c 3,00,000 –
Work-in-progress Control A/c 1,50,000 –
Finished Goods Control A/c 2,50,000 –
Manufacturing Overhead Control A/c – 15,000
Cost Ledger Control A/c – 6,85,000
7,00,000 7,00,000
During the next quarter, the following items arose:
( )
Finished Product (at cost) 2,25,000
Manufacturing overhead incurred 85,000
Raw material purchased 1,25,000
Factory wages 40,000
Indirect labour 20,000
Cost of sales 1,75,000
Materials issued to production 1,35,000
Sales returned (at cost) 9,000
Materials returned to suppliers 13,000
Manufacturing overhead charged to production 85,000
You are required to prepare the Cost Ledger Control A/c, Stores Ledger Control A/c, Work-in- progress
Control A/c, Finished Stock Ledger Control A/c, Manufacturing Overhead Control A/c, Wages Control A/
Production overhead incurred = Payment made + Closing Outstanding + Prov. for Depreciation – Open-
ing Outstanding
Finished Goods A/c
( ) ( )
To Balance b/d 52,325 By Cost of sales A/c 5,00,500
To Work-in-progress A/c 4,89,125 By Balance c/d 80,450
To Admin. overheads A/c 39,500
5,80,950 5,80,950
Administration Overheads A/c
( ) ( )
To Pre-paid admin. overheads A/c 9,975 By Finished goods A/c 39,500
To Bank 27,300
To Admin. overheads outstanding 2,225
39,500 39,500
Cost of Sales A/c
( ) ( )
To Finished Goods A/c 5,00,500 By Sales A/c 5,32,350
To Selling Overheads 31,850 .
5,32,350 5,32,350
Particulars ( ) Particulars ( )
To Balance b/d 32,000 By W.I.P. Control A/c 1,60,000
To General ledger adjustment A/c 1,58,000 By Work overhead control A/c 20,000
To Work in progress control A/c 80,000 By Costing Profit and Loss A/c 6,000
By Balance c/d 84,000
2,70,000 2,70,000
W.I.P. Control Account
Particulars ( ) Particulars ( )
To Balance b/d 60,000 By Stores Control A/c 80,000
To Stores control A/c 1,60,000 By Costing Profit and Loss A/c 4,00,000
(cost of sales)
To Direct wages control A/c 65,000 By Balance c/d 45,000
To Works overhead control A/c 2,40,000 .
5,25,000 5,25,000
Works Overhead Control Account
Particulars ( ) Particulars ( )
To General Ledger Adjustment A/c 2,50,000 By W.I.P. Control A/c 2,40,000
To Store Ledger Control A/c 20,000 By Costing P & L A/c (Under recocvery) 30,000
2,70,000 2,70,000
Costing Profit & Loss Account
Particulars ( ) Partiuclars ( )
To W.I.P. Control A/c (Cost of Sales) 4,00,000 By General ledger adj. A/c
To Works overhead control A/c 30,000 Cost of Sales 4,00,000
To Stores control A/c (shortage) 6,000 10% Profit 40,000 4,40,000
To Profit 4,000 .
4,40,000 4,40,000
(B) Financial Books
Profit & Loss Account
Particulars ( ) Particualrs ( )
To Opening Stock By Sales 4,40,000
Stores 32,000 By Closing Stock:
W.I.P. 60,000 92,000 Stores 84,000
To Purchases 1,58,000 W.I.P. 45,000 1,29,000
To Wages incurred 70,000 By Income from investment 10,000
To Overheads incurred 2,50,000 By Loss 11,000
1,000
Less: Closing Finished goods stock ( 44,12,850 ) 1,42,350
31,000
Cost of Goods sold 42,70,500
Add: Selling & Distribution Overheads ( 13 × 30,000units) 3,90,000
Cost of Sales 46,60,500
Profit (Balancing Figure) 2,14,500
Sales 48,75,000
(ii) Production OH A/c
( ) ( )
To Gen. Ledger Adj. A/c 6,92,250 By WIP A/c 7,01,350
To Overhead Adj. A/c (Over-absorption) 9,100 .
7,01,350 7,01,350
Administration Overheads A/c
( ) ( )
To General Ledger Adj. A/c 3,10,375 By Finished Goods A/c 3,02,250
By Overheads Adj. A/c 8,125
. (under-absorption) .
3,10,375 3,10,375
10,680 10,680
To Cost of Contract 8,780 By Work certified 10,000
To Costing Profit & Loss A/c 1,220
(Notional Profit)
10,000 10,000
3 1
26,39,600 – 26,39,600 6,59,900
2 2
( 72,000×1/3) 24,000
( 57,000×1/3) 19,000
To Depreciation on
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
concrete mixture**.
( 8,20,000×15%×180/365) 60,658
( 8,20,000×15%×180/365) 33,699
(balance c/d)
* Assuming donation paid to local club was exclusively for the above projects, hence included in the
contract account.
** Depreciation on concrete mixture machine is charged on the basis of number of days used for the
projects, as it is clearly mentioned in the question that this machine can be used for other projects
also.
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
issued
24,14,583 24,14,583
(ii) Understand
Direct Wages theCost
Fundamental
: Accounting Assumptions.
Plant to be Used
Question 12—
Paramount Engineers are engaged in construction and erection of a bridge under a long-term con-
tract. The cost incurred upto 31.03.2014 was as under:
Amount ( ) in lakhs
Fabrication
© The Institute Costs: Accountants of India
of Chartered
Direct Materials 280
Direct Labour 100
Overheads 60
440
Erection Cost of date 110
550
The contract price is 11 crores and the cash received on account till 31.03.2014 was 6 crores.
The technical estimate of the contract indicates the following degree of completion of work. Fabrica-
tion - Direct Material - 70%, Director Labour and Overheads 60% Erection - 40%.
You are required to estimate the profit that could be taken to Costing Profit and Loss Account against
this partly completed contract as at 31.03.2014.
Answer
Working Notes :
1. Statement showing estimated profit to date and future profit on the completion of contract
97,000 97,000
** 20 per unit.
(5,000 – 150) 4,850
Question 2—
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
JK Ltd. produces a product "AZE", which passes through two processes, viz., process I and process II. The
output of each process is treated as the raw material of the next process to which it is transferred and output
of the second process is transferred to finished stock. The following data related to December, 2013:
Process I Process II
25,000 units introduced at a cost of 2,00,000 –
Material Consumed 1,92,000 96,020
Direct Labour 2,24,000 1,28,000
Manufacturing Expenses 1,40,000 60,000
Normal wastage of input 10% 10%
Scrap value of normal wastage (per unit) 9.90 8.60
Output in Units 22,000 20,000
Required:
(i) Prepare Process I and Process II account
(ii) Prepare Abnormal Gain/Loss Account as the case may be for each process.
Chapter 10 : Process and Operation Costing 10.2
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Answer—
After studying this chapter, you will be ableProcess
to: I Account
Understand the concepts of audit documentation, nature and purpose of audit documentation,
Particulasrs Units Amount particulars Units Amount
Form, content and extent of audit documentation, audit documentation summary, audit fi le, assembly of
theInput
To fi nal audit fi le, 25,000 2,00,000 By Normal wastage 2,500 24,750
ownership of audit documentation, nature of related party(2,500 relationships
units × 9.90)
and transactions.
To Material 1,92,000 By Abnoraml loss A/c 500
Gain the knowledge of written representations and the objectives of the auditor regarding16,250
written representation. (500 units × 32.50)
Identify
To Direct Labour Audit Evidence-Specifi c Considerations
2,24,000 By For Selected
Process Items, External
– II confi rmation.
22,000 7,15,000
Learn objective of Auditor with respect to Opening balances - in conducting an initial audit
(22,000 units × 32.50)
engagement.
To Manufacturing Exp. . 1,40,000 . .
Explain audit evidence, suffi ciency and appropriateness of audit evidence, types of audit
evidence, relevance and reliability 25,000 7,56,000and also methods to obtain audit
of audit evidence, 25,000
evidence. 7,56,000
Understand materiality, its defi nition and judge the materiality of the item in different circum-
stances. 7,56,000 – 24,750
Cost per unit 32.50 per unit
25 , 000 units – 2,500 units
Explain concepts of true and fair and disclosure of accounting policies.
Understand the Fundamental Accounting Assumptions.
Process – II Account
Particulars Units Amount Particulars Units Amount
( ) ( )
To Process – I 22,000 7,15,000 By Normal wastage 2,200 18,920
(2,200 units × 8.60)
© The
To Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Material 96,020 By Finished stock 20,000 9,90,000
(20,000 units × 49.50)
To Direct Labour 1,28,000
To Manufacturing Exp. 60,000
To Abnormal Gain A/c 200 9,900
(200 units × 49.50) . . . .
22.200 10,08,920 22,200 10,08,920
9,99,020 – 18,920
Cost per unit 49.50 per unit
22,000 units – 2,200 units
Chapter 10 : Process and Operation Costing 10.3
LEARNING OUTCOMES Abnormal Loss Account
After studying this chapter, you will
Particulars be able to:Amount Particulars
Units Units Amount
Understand the concepts of audit documentation, nature and purpose of audit documentation,
Form, content and extent of audit documentation, audit ( ) documentation summary, audit fi le, assembly( of)
the fi
To nal auditA/c
Process-I fi le, 500 16,250 By Cash (Sales) 500 4,950
ownership of audit documentation, nature of related party(500 relationships
units × 9.90)
and transactions.
Gain the knowledge of written .representations . and
Bythe
Costing P & LofA/c
objectives .
the auditor regarding 11,300
written representation. 500 16,250 500 16,250
Identify Audit Evidence-Specifi c Considerations For Selected Items, External confi rmation.
Learn objective of Auditor withAbnormal
respect to Opening balances - in conducting an initial audit
Gain Account
engagement.
Particualrs Units Amount Particulars Units Amount
Explain audit evidence, suffi ciency and appropriateness of audit evidence, types of audit
evidence, relevance and reliability of audit evidence, ( )and also methods to obtain audit evidence. ( )
To NormalUnderstand
wastage materiality, its defi
200nition and1,720
judge the
Bymateriality
Process IIof the item in different
A/c 200 circum-
9,900
stances.
(200 units × 8.60)
Explain concepts of true and fair and disclosure of accounting policies.
To Costing Profit andthe
Understand Loss .
Fundamental Accounting 8,180
Assumptions. . .
200 9,900 200 9,900
Question 3—
M J Pvt. Ltd. produces a product “SKY” which passes through two processes, viz. Process-A and Process-
B. The details for the year ending 31st March, 2014 are as follows:
Process – A Process – B
40,000 Units introduced at a cost of 3,60,000 –
© The Institute
Material Consumedof Chartered Accountants of India 2,42,000 2,25,000
Direct Wages 2,58,000 1,90,000
Manufacturing Expenses 1,96,000 1,23,720
Output in units 37,000 27,000
Normal Wastage of Inuput 5% 10%
Scrap Value (per unit) 15 20
Selling Price (per unit) 37 61
Additional Information:
(a) 80% of the output of Process-A, was passed on to the next process and the balance was sold. The
entire output of Process- B was sold.
(b) Indirect expenses for the year was 4,48,080.
(c) It is assumed that Process-A and Process-B are not responsibility centre.
Required:
(i) Prepare Process –A and Process – B Account
(ii) Prepare Profit and Loss Account showing the net profit / net Loss for the year.
Chapter 10 : Process and Operation Costing 10.4
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Answer—
After
(i) studying this chapter, you will be able to: A Account
Proecss–
Understand the concepts of audit documentation, nature and purpose of audit documentation,
Particulars Units
Form, content and extent of audit documentation, Amount Particulars summary, audit
audit documentation Units Amount
fi le, assembly of
the fi nal audit fi le, ( ) ( )
ownership
To Input of audit documentation, nature of related
40,000 partyBy
3,60,000 relationships
Normal Wastage 2,000 30,000
and transactions.
Gain the knowledge of written representations and (2,000 units × 15)of the auditor regarding
the objectives
written
To representation.
Material – 2,42,000 By Abnormal Loss A/c 1,000 27,000
Identify Audit Evidence-Specifi c Considerations(1,000 For Selected Items,
units × 27) External confi rmation.
Learn objective of Auditor with respect to Opening balances - in conducting an initial audit
To Direct Wages
engagement. – 2,58,000 By Process – B 29,600 7,99,200
Explain audit evidence, suffi ciency and appropriateness of audit
(29,600 units evidence, types of audit
× 27)
evidence,
To relevance
Manufacturing and reliability of audit
Exp. – evidence,
1,96,000andByalso methods
Profit to obtain
& Loss A/c audit evidence.1,99,800
7,400
Understand materiality, its defi nition and judge the materiality of the item in different circum-
stances. . . (7,400 units × 27) . .
Explain concepts of true40,000
and fair and disclosure of accounting policies. 40,000
10,56,000 10,56,000
Understand the Fundamental Accounting Assumptions.
10,56,000 – 30,000
Cost per Unit 27 per unit
40,000 units – 2,000 units
Normal wastage = 40,000 units × 5% = 2,000 units
Abnormal loss = 40,000 units - (37,000 units + 2,000 units) = 1,000 units
Transfer to Process- B = 37,000 units × 80% = 29,600 units
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Sale = 37,000 units × 20% = 7,400 units
Process – B Account
Proecss– B Account
Particulars Units Amount Particulars Units Amount
( ) ( )
To Process -A A/c 29,600 7,99,200 By Normal wastage 2,960 59,200
(2,960 units × 20)
To Material – 2,25,000 By Profit & Loss A/c 27,000 12,96,000
(27,000 units × 48)
To Direct Wages – 1,90,000
To Manufacturing Exp. – 1,23,720
To Abnormal Gain sA/c 360 17,280
(360 units × 48) . . . .
29,960 13,55,200 29,960 13,55,200
Chapter 10 : Process and Operation Costing 10.5
LEARNING
aaa OUTCOMES 13,37,920 – 59,200
Afterper
Cost studying to:
unit this chapter, you will be able 48 per units
29,600units – 2,960 units
Understand the concepts of audit documentation, nature and purpose of audit documentation,
Form,
Normalcontent
wastageand extent of audit documentation, audit×documentation
= 29,600 units summary, audit fi le, assembly of
10% = 2,960 units
the fi nal audit fi le,
Abnormal gain = (27,000 units + 2,960 units) – 29,600 units = 360 units
ownership of audit documentation, nature of related party relationships
and transactions.
(ii) Gain the knowledge of written representations and the
Profit and Loss objectives of the auditor regarding
Acccount
written representation.
Particulars Amount Particulars Amount
Identify Audit Evidence-Specifi c Considerations For Selected Items, External confi rmation.
Learn objective of Auditor with respect( )to Opening balances - in conducting an initial audit ( )
engagement.
To Process – A A/c 1,99,800 By Sales:
Explain audit evidence, suffi ciency and appropriateness of audit evidence, types of audit
To Process – B A/C 12,96,000 – Process – A 2,73,800
evidence, relevance and reliability of audit evidence, and also methods to obtain audit evidence.
(7,400
Understand materiality, its defi nition and judge theunits × 37) of the item in different circum-
materiality
stances.
To Abnormal Loss A/c 12,000 – Process – B 16,47,000
Explain concepts of true and fair and disclosure of accounting policies.
(27,000 units × 61)
Understand the Fundamental Accounting Assumptions.
To Indirect Expenses 4,48,080 By Abnormal Gain 10,080
. By Net Loss 25,000
19,55,880 19,55,880
Working Notes:
Normal Wastage (Loss) Account
© The Institute of Chartered Accountants
Particulars Units of India
Amount Particulars Units Amount
( ) ( )
To Process –A A/c 2,000 30,000 By Abnormal Gain A/c 360 7,200
To Process – B A/c 2,960 59,200 By Bank (Sales) 4,600 82,000
4,960 89,200 4,960 89,200
Price or 33 13 % on cost)
– 3,24,000 3,24,000 . . .
7,45,629 5,50,371 12,96,000 7,45,629 5,50,371 12,96,000
Finished Stock Account
Dr. Cr.
Particulars Cost Profit Total Particulars Cost Profit Total
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
To Opening Stock 25,000 20,000 45,000 By Closing P & L A/c 7,41,862 6,58,138 14,00,000
To Process 'Z' A/c 7,45,629 5,50,371 12,96,000
Total 7,70,629 5,70,371 13,41,000
Less: Closing Stock 28,767 21,233 50,000
To Costing P& L A/c 7,41,862 5,49,138 12,91,000
. 1,09,000 1,09,000
7,41,862 6,58,138 14,00,000 7,41,862 6,58,138 14,00,000
Costing Profit and Loss Account
For the year ending 31st March, 2014
Particulars Amount Particulars Amount
( ) ( )
To Provision for unlrealized Profit on closing By Provision for unrealized profit on
Stock ( 4,379 + 9,750 + 21,233) 35,362 Opeining Stock
( 4,000 + 10,000 + 20,000) 34,000
To Net Profit 6,58,138 By Process X A/c 74,000
By Process Y A/c 1,52,500
By Process Z A/c 3,24,000
. By Finished Stock A/c 1,09,000
6,93,500 6,93,500
Working Notes:
Calculaltion of amount of unrealized profit on closing Stock:
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.11
Process 'X' = Nil
78,000
Process 'Y' = 32,000 4,379
5,70,000
2,36,121
Process 'Y' = 39,000 9750
9,44,500
5,50,371
Process 'Z' = 50,000 21,233.
12,96,000
Balance Sheet on 31st March, 2014, (Extract)
Liablilities Amount ( ) Assets Amount ( )
Net Profit 6,58,138 Closing Stock
Process – X 20,000
Process – Y 32,000
Process – Z 39,000
Fininshed Stock 50,000
1,41,000
Less: Provision for unrealized profit 35,362
1,05,638
Question 6—
Pharma Limited produces product 'Gluco-G' which passes through two processes before it is completed and
transferred to finished stock. The following data relates to March, 2014:
1
price i.e. 33 on total cost 2,70,000 – 2,70,000
3
10,80,000 8,10,000 2,70,000 10,80,000 8,10,000 2,70,000
Process II A/c
Particulars Total Cost Profit Particulars Total Cost Profit
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
To Opening Stock 1,80,000 1,50,000 30,000 By Transfer to 22,50,000 15,15,000 7,35,000
To Direct Material 3,15,000 3,15,000 – Process II A/c
To Direct Wages 2,25,000 2,25,000 –
To Transfer from
Process I A/c 10,80,000 8,10,000 2,70,000
Prime Cost 18,00,000 15,00,000 3,00,000
Less: Closing Stock 90,000 75,000 15,000
17,10,000 14,25,000 2,85,000
To Factory Overhead 90,000 90,000 –
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.13
Total Cost: 18,00,000 15,15,000 2,85,000
Profit 20% on Transfer
price i.e. 25% on cost 4,50,000 – 4,50,000
22,50,000 15,15,000 7,35,000 22,50,000 15,15,000 7,35,000
3,00,000
Profit element in closing stock 90,000 15,000
18,00,000
Finished Stock A/c
7,35,000
Profit element in closing Finished Stock = 2,25,000 73,500
22,50,000
Calculation of Profit on Sale
*********************
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.14
Question 7—
XP Ltd. furnishes you the following information relating to process II.
(i) Opening work-in-progress - NIL
(ii) Units introduced 42,000 units @ 12
(iii) Expenses debited to the process: ( )
Direct material = 61,530
Labour = 88,820
Overhead = 1,76,400
(iv) Normal loss in the process = 2 % of input.
(v) Closing work-in-progress – 1,200 units
Degree of completion - Materials 100%
Labour 50%
Overhead 40%
(vi) (vi)Finished output - 39,500 units
(vii) Degree of completion of abnormal loss:
Material 100%
Labour 80%
Overhead 60%
(viii) Units scraped as normal loss were sold at 4.50 per unit.
(ix) All the units of abnormal loss were sold at 9 per unit.
Prepare:
(a) Statement of equivalent production;
(b) Statement showing the cost of finished goods, abnormal loss and closing work-in- progress;
(c) Process II account and abnormal loss account.
Answer—
(a) Statement of Equivalent Production
Amount ( )
Abnormal Loss:
Material (460 units × 13.648) 6,278.08
Labour (368 units × 2.195) 807.76
Overheads (276 units × 4.382) 1,209.42
8,295.26
Closing W.I.P:
Material (1,200 units × 13.648) 16,377.60
Labour (600 units × 2.195) 1,317.00
Overheads (480 units × 4.382) 2,103.36
19,797.96
Finished Goods
(39,500 units × 20.225) 7,98,887.50
Question 8—
ABX Company Ltd. provides the following information relating to Process-B:
(i) Opening Work-in-progress - NIL
(ii) Units Introduced - 45,000 units @ 10 per unit
(iii) Expenses debited to the process:
Direct material 65,500
Labour 90,800
Overhead 1,80,700
(iv) Normal loss in the process - 2% of Input
(v) Work-in progress - 1800 units
Degree of completion
Materials - 100%
Labour - 50%
Overhead - 40%
(vi) Finished output - 42,000 units
(vii) Degree of completion of abnormal loss:
Materials - 100%
Labour - 80%
Overhead - 60%
(viii) Units scrapped as normal loss were sold at 5 per unit.
(ix) All the units of abnormal loss were sold at 2 per unit.
You are required to prepare:
(a) Statement of equivalent production.
(b) Statement showing the cost of finished goods, abnormal loss and closing balance of work-in-progress.
(c) Process-B Account and Abnormal Loss account.
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.17
Answer—
(a) Statement of Equivalent Production
Equivalent Production
Output
Input Deatails Units Particul- Units
Material Labour Overhead
ars
% Units % Units % Units
Finished
Unit Introduced 45,000 42,000 100 42,000 100 42,000 100 42,000
Output
Normal
loss (2%
900 – – – – – –
of
45,000)
Abnormal
300 100 300 80 240 60 180
loss
Closing
1,800 100 1,800 50 900 40 720
W-I-P
Process – B A/c
Question 10—
The following information relate to Process A:
(i) Opening Work-in-Progress 8,000 units at 75,000
Degree of Completion: Material 100%
Labour and Overhead 60%
(ii) Input 1,82,000 units at 7,37,500
(iii) Wages paid 3,40,600
(iv) Overheads paid 1,70,300
(v) Units scrapped 14,000
Degree of Completion: Material 100 %
Wages and Overheads 80%
(vi) Closing Work - in- Progress 18,000 units
Degree of Completion: Material 100%
Wages and Overheads 70%
(vii) Units completed and 1,58,000 to next process
(viii) Normal loss 5% of total input including opening WIP
(ix) Scrap value is 5 per unit to be adjusted out of direct material cost
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.21
You are required to compute on the basis of FIFO
(i) Equivalent Production
(ii) Cost Per Unit
(iii) Value of Units transferred to next process.
Answer—
(i) Statement of Equivalent Production (FIFO Method)
Labour
Intem Units Item Units Mat-A (%) Mat-B (%) & (%)
OHs.
Proce- 53,000 Introduced & 46,000 46,000 100 46,000 100 46,000 100
ss II completed
transf- during the
er period
(48,000
–2000)
Question 12—
The following information is furnished by ABC Company for Process - II of its manufacturing activity for
the month of April 2015:
(i) Opening Work-in-Progress – Nil
(ii) Units transferred from Process I – 55,000 units at 3,27,800
(iii) Expenditure debited to Process - II:
Consumables 1,57,200
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.25
Labour 1,04,000
Overhead 52,000
(iv) Units transferred to Process III - 51,000 units
(v) Closing WIP – 2,000 units (Degree of completion):
Consumables 80%
Labour 60%
Overhead 60%
(vi) Units scrapped - 2,000 units, scrapped units were sold at 5 per unit
(vii) Normal loss - 4% of units introduced
You are required to:
(i) Prepare a Statement of Equivalent Production.
(ii) Determine the cost per unit
(iii) Determine the value of Work-in-Process and units transferred to Process - III
Answer—
(i) Statement of Equivalent Production
Equivalent Production
Input Output Material- A* Consumables Labour &
Units Units
Details Particulars Overheads
% Units % Units % Units
Units 55,000 Units 51,000 100 51,000 100 51,000 100 51,000
transferre transferred to
d from Process- III
Process-I
Normal loss 2,200 – – – – – –
(4% of
55,000)
Closing W-I-P 2,000 100 2,000 80 1,600 60 1,200
( )
Raw Material 23
Labour 7
Overheads 9
39
Required:
(a) Calculate the quantity (in litres) of raw material inputs during the month.
(b) Calculate the quantity (in litres) of normal loss expected from the process and the quantity (in
litres) of abnormal loss / gain experienced in the month.
(c) Calculate the values of raw material, labour and overheads added to the process during the month.
(d) Prepare the process account for the month.
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.27
Answer—
(a) Calculation of Raw Material inputs during the month:
Litres
Total process losses for month 1,800
Normal Loss (10% input) 536
Abnormal Loss (balancing figure) 1,264
(c) Calculation of values of Raw Material, Labour and Overheads added to the process:
Workings:
Statement of Equivalent Units (Litre):
Equivalent Production
Input Details
Units Output details Units Material Labour Overheads
Units (%) Units (%) Units (%)
Opening 800 Units completed:
WIP
Units 5,360 - Opening WIP 800 -- -- 240 30 320 40
introduced
- Fresh inputs 3,400 3,400 100 3,400 100 3,400 100
Normal loss 536 -- -- -- -- -- --
Abnormal loss 1,264 1,264 100 1,264 100 1,264 100
Closing WIP 160 160 100 48 30 32 20
6,160 6,160 4,824 4,952 5,016
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.28
(d) Process Account for Month
***************
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.29
Question 14—
The following details are available of Process X for August 2013:
(1) Opening Work-in-Process 8,000 units
Degree of completion and cost:
Material (100%) 63,900
Labour (60%) 10,800
Overheads (60%) 5,400
(2) Input 1,82,000 units at 7,56,900
(3) Labour paid 3,28,000
(4) Over heads incurred 1,64,000
(5) Units scrapped 14,000
Degree of completion :
Material 100%
Labour and overhead 80%
(6) Closing work-in-process 18,000 units
Degree of completion :
Material 100%
Labour and overhead 70%
(7) 1,58,000 units were completed and transferred to next process.
(8) Normal loss is 8% of total input including opening work-in-process
(9) Scrap value is 8 per unit to be adjusted in direct material cost
You are required to compute, assuming that average method of inventory is used:
(i) Equivalent production, and
(ii) Cost per unit
Answer—
(i) Statement of Equivalent Production
Answer—
(i) Statement of Equivalent Production
Equivalent production
Answer—
Statement of Equivalent production of Process RT
1,20,000 kg. of Product ‘A’ input 1,60,000 kg. of Product ‘A’ input
( ) ( )
Materials Cost 1,32,000 1,76,000
Processing Costs 1,20,000 1,40,000
Required:
(i) Determine, using the weighted average cost method, the cost per kg. of Product 'A' in Process I and
value of both work completed and closing work-in-progress for the month just ended.
(ii) Is it worthwhile processing 1,20,000 kg. of Product 'A' further?
(iii) Calculate the minimum acceptable selling price per kg., if a potential buyer could be found for
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.35
additional output of Product 'AX' that could be produced with the remaining Product 'A' quantity.
Answer—
(i) Process –I
Statement of Equivalent Production
Inputs Output Equivalent output
Material Conversion
Particulars Kg. Particulars Kg.
(%) kg. (%) kg.
Opening W.I.P. 40,0 00 Normal loss 40,000 – – -- --
New material Units
introduced 2,00,000 introduced &
completed 1,60,000 100 1,60,000 100 1,60,000
Abnormal loss 10,000 100 10,000 100 10,000
Closing WIP 30,000 100 30,000 2/3r d 20,000
2,40,000 2,40,000 2,00,000 1,90,000
Process- I
Statement of Cost for each element
Elements of cost Costs of Costs in Total cost Equiv alent Cost per
opening WIP process units Kg.
( ) ( ) ( ) Kg . ( )
Material 20,000 75 ,000 95,000 2,0 0,0 00 0.475
Conversion cost 12,000 1 ,02 ,000 1 ,14,000 1,9 0,0 00 0.600
32,000 1,77,000 2,09,000 1.075
Statement of Apportionment of Cost
Units Elements Equivalent units
Cost/un Cost Total cost
completed (Kg.) it
( ) ( ) ( )
Work completed Material 1,60,000 0.475 76,000
Conversion 1,60,000 0.600 96,000 1,72,000
Closing WIP Material 30,000 0.475 14,250
Conversion 20,000 0.600 12,000 26,250
(ii) Statement showing comparative data to decide whether 1,20,000 kg. of product 'A' should
be processed further into 'AX'.
Alternative I - To sell product 'A' after Process - I ( )
Sales 1,20,000 kg. × 1.60 1,92,000
Less: cost form process – I 1,20,000 kg. × 1.075 1,29,000
Profit 63,000
Alternative II - Process further into 'AX'
Sales 2,40,000 kg. 2.00 4,80,000
Less: Cost from Process- I 1,20,000 kg. × 1.075 = 1,29,000
Material in Process- II = 1,32,000
Processing cost in Process- II = 1,20,000 3,81,000
Profit 99,000
Hence company should process further
It will increase profit by 99,000 - 63,000 = 36,000
Chapter 10 : Process and Operating Costing 10.36
(iii) Calculation of minimum selling price per kg.:
Cost of processing remaining 40,000 kg. further ( )
Material 1,76,000 1,32,000 44,000
Processing cost 1,40,000 - 1,20,000 20,000
Cost from process- I relating to 40,000 kg. 'A' (40,000 kg. × 1.075) 43,000
Benefit foregone if 40,000 kg. 'A' are further processed
40,000 kg. ( 1.60 - 1.075) 21,000
Total cost 1,28,000
Additional quantity of product 'AX' (40,000 kg. × 2) 80,000
1,28,000
Minimum selling price 80,000kg. 1.60
************
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.1
A. Joint Product
Question 1.
The Sunshine Oil Company purchases crude vegetables oil. It does refining of the same. The refining
process results in four products at the split off point: M, N, O and P.
Product O is fully processed at the split off point. Product M, N and P can be individually further refined
into ‘Super M’, ‘Super N’ and ‘Super P’. In the most recent month (March, 2014), the output at split off
point was:
Product M ` 20,00,000
Product N ` 12,00,000
Product P ` 28,00,000
You are required to answer:
How the joint cost of ` 40,00,000 would be allocated between each product under each of the following
methods (a) sales value at split off; (b) physical output (gallons); and (c) estimated net realizable value?
Could Sunshine have increased its March, 2014 operating profits by making different decisions about the
further refining of product M, N or P? Show the effect of any change you recommend on operating profits.
Answer
(i) Allocation of Joint Cost by the following methods:
(a) Sales Value at split – off Method
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.2
in department S. There is no loss in further Processing of any of the three products. The cost data for a
month are as under:
Cost of raw materials introduced in department P `12,68,800
Direct Wages Department
(`)
P 3,84,000
Q 96,000
R 64,000
S 36,000
Factory overheads of `4,64,000 are to be apportioned to the departments on direct wage basis.
During the month under reference, the company sold all three products after processing them further as
under:
Products A B C
Output sold (kg.) 44,000 40,000 20,000
Selling Price per kg. (`) 32 24 16
There is no opening or closing stocks. If these products were sold at the split off stage, that is, without
further processing, the selling prices would have been ` 20, ` 22 and ` 10 each per kg respectively for A,
B and C.
Required:
(i) Prepare a statement showing the apportionment of joint costs to joint products.
(ii) Present a statement showing product-wise and total profit for the month under reference as per the
company's current processing policy.
(iii) What processing decision should have been taken to improve the profitability of the company?
(iv) Calculate the product-wise and total profit arising from your recommendation in (iii) above.
Answer
(i) Statement showing the apportionment of joint costs to joint products
Products
A B C Total
Output sold Kg.: (I) 44,000 40,000 20,000
Selling price per kg. at split off (`): (II) 20 22 10
Sales value at split off (`): (I) x (II) 8,80,000 8,80,000 2,00,000 19,60,000
Joint costs (costs incurred in 8,80,000 8,80,000 2,00,000 19,60,000
department P (`)
(apportioned on the basis of sales value at
the point of split off) i.e. (22:22:5)
(Working Note 1)
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.5
(ii) Statement showing product-wise and total profit for the month under reference
(as per the company’s current processing policy)
Products
A B C Total
Output (kg.) : (a) 44,000 40,000 20,000
Selling price per kg. after further 32 24 16
processing (`): (b)
Sales value after further 14,08,000 9,60,000 3,20,000 26,88,000
processing (`).:(c) = {(a) x (b)}
Joint costs (`): (d) 8,80,000 8,80,000 2,00,000 19,60,000
Further processing costs (`): (e)
(Working Note 2) 1,72,800 1,15,200 64,800 3,52,800
Total costs (`): (f) = [(d) + (e)} 10,52,800 9,95,200 2,64,800 23,12,800
Profit/ (Loss) (`): [(c))– (f)} 3,55,200 (35,200) 55,200 3,75,200
Alternatively:
Working Notes:
1. Statement of department-wise costs
P Q R S
(`) (`) (`) (`)
Raw materials 12,68,800
Wages 3,84,000 96,000 64,000 36,000
Overheads 3,07,200 76,800 51,200 28,800
(Apportioned on the basis of
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.6
(`)
Direct Materials 90,000
Direct Wages 1,20,000
Variable Overheads 1,00,000
Fixed Overheads 1,00,000
The loss in process is 5% of input and the output ratio of P and Q which emerge simultaneously is 1:2.
The selling prices of the two products at the point of split off are: P ` 12 per kg. and Q ` 20 per kg. A
proposal is available to process P further by mixing it with other purchased materials. The entire current
output of the plant can be so processed further to obtain a new product ‘S’. The price per kg. of S is ` 15
and each kg of output of S will require one kilogram of input P. The cost of processing of P into S
(including other materials) is `1,85,000 per month.
You are required to prepare a statement showing the monthly profitability based both on the existing
manufacturing operations and on further processing.
Will you recommend further processing?
Answer
Working
Notes
1.
(Kg.)
Material input 1,50,000
Less: Loss of Material in process (5% of 1,50,000 kg.) 7,500
Total output 1,42,500
2. Output of P and Q are in the ratio of 1 : 2 of the total output:
1,42,500 kg. 1
P 47,500 kg.
3
1,42,500 kg. 2
Q 95,000 kg.
3
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.7
3. Joint Costs:
(`)
Material (input) (1,50,000 kg. × ` 12) 18,00,000
Direct Material 90,000
Direct Wages 1,20,000
Variable Overheads 1,00,000
Fixed overheads 1,00,000
22,10,000
4. Sales Revenue of P, Q and S
P = 47,500 Kg. × ` 12 = ` 5,70,000 Q = 95,000 Kg. × ` 20 = ` 19,00,000 S = 47,500 Kg. × `
15 = ` 7,12,500.
5. Apportionment of joint costs viz. ` 22,10,000 over P and Q in proportion of their sales value i.e.
` 5,70,000 and ` 19,00,000, i.e., 3 : 10 is:
Total P Q
(`) (`) (`)
Joint cost apportionment 22,10,000 5,10,000 17,00,000
in the ratio of 3 : 10
` 22,10,000 3 ` 22,10,000 10
13 13
6. Total Cost of 47,500 kg. of S = Joint Cost of P + Cost of Processing P into S.
= ` 5,10,000 + ` 1,85,000 = ` 6,95,000.
Statement showing the Monthly Profitability
Based on existing Based on further processing of
manufacturing operations P into S
Products Products
P Q Total S Q Total
Sales quantity (kg.) 47,500 95,000 1,42,500 47,500 95,000 1,42,500
(`) (`) (`) (`) (`) (`)
Sales Revenue 5,70,000 19,00,000 24,70,000 7,12,500 19,00,000 26,12,500
(Working Note 4)
Less: Joint Costs 5,10,000 17,00,000 22,10,000 6,95,000 17,00,000 23,95,000
(Working Note 5) *
Profit 60,000 2,00,000 2,60,000 17,500 2,00,000 2,17,500
*Working Note 6
Recommendation: Further processing of P is not recommended as it results in a lower profit of P.
Question 4.
A company produces two joint product X and Y, from the same basic materials. The processing
is completed in three departments.
Materials are mixed in Department I. At the end of this process X and Y get separated. After separation X
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.8
is completed in the Department II and Y is finished in Department III. During a period 2,00,000 kg. of raw
material were processed in Department I, at a total cost of ` 8,75,000, and the resultant 60% becomes X
and 30% becomes Y and 10% normally lost in processing.
In Department II 1/6th of the quantity received from Department I is lost in processing. X is further
processed in Department II at a cost of ` 1,80,000.
In Department III further new material added to the material received from Department I and weight
mixture is doubled, there is no quantity loss in the department. Further processing cost (with material cost)
in Department III is ` 1,50,000.
The details of sales during the year are:
Product X Product Y
Quantity sold (kg.) 90,000 1,15,000
Sales price per kg (`) 10 4
There were no opening stocks. If these products sold at split-off-point, the selling price of X and Y would
be ` 8 and ` 4 per kg respectively.
Required:
(i) Prepare a statement showing the apportionment of joint cost to X and Y in proportion of sales value at
split off point.
(ii) Prepare a statement showing the cost per kg of each product indicating joint cost, processing cost and
total cost separately.
(iii) Prepare a statement showing the product wise profit for the year.
On the basis of profits before and after further processing of product X and Y, give your comment that
products should be further processed or not.
Answer
Calculation of quantity produced
Dept I (kg) Dept II (kg) Dept III (kg)
Input 2,00,000 1,20,000 60,000
(60% of 2,00,000 kg.) (30% of 2,00,000
kg.)
Weight lost or added (20,000) (20,000) 60,000
(10% of 2,00,000 (1/6 th of 2,00,000 kg.)
kg.)
1,80,000 1,00,000 1,20,000
Production of X 1,20,000 1,00,000 –
Production of Y 60,000 – 1,20,000
(i) Statement of apportionment of joint cost
Product X Product Y
Output (kg) 1,20,000 60,000
Selling price per kg (`) 8 4
Sales value (`) 9,60,000 2,40,000
Share in Joint cost (4:1) 7,00,000 1,75,000
(` 8,75,000 × 4 ÷ (` 8,75,000 × 1 ÷ 5)
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.9
5)
(b) Statement of joint cost allocation of inventories of X, Y and Z for Balance sheet purposes
(By using Constant Gross Margin Percentage Net Realisable Value Method)
Product
Total
X Y Z
(`) (`) (`) (`)
Final sales value of 5,49,000 6,60,375 5,70,750 17,80,125
total production
Less: Gross margin 2,60,641 3,13,517 2,70,967 8,45,125
(Working Note 3)
2,88,359 3,46,858 2,99,783 9,35,000
Less: Additional -- -- 3,10,000 3,10,000
Cost
Joint cost allocated 2,88,359 3,46,858 (10,217) 6,25,000
Note: The negative joint cost allocation to product Z illustrates one ‘unusual’ feature of the constant
gross margin NRV method.
Cost of Goods Sold for Income Statement purpose
(By using Constant Gross Margin Percentage Net Realizable Value Method)
Products
Total
X Y Z
(`) (`) (`) (`)
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.12
Similarly, the joint cost of inventories of products Y and Z comes to ` 2,80,748 and ` 1,10,854
respectively.
3. Gross margin percentage
(`)
Final sales value production 17,80,125
Less: Joint cost and additional costs (` 6,25,000 + ` 3,10,000) 9,35,000
Gross margin 8,45,125
Gross margin percentage (` 8,45,125 ÷ ` 17,80,125) × 100 47.4756%
Question 6.
SV chemicals Limited processes 9,00,000 kgs. of raw material in a month purchased at ` 95 per kg in
department X. The input output ratio of department X is 100 : 90. Processing of the material results in two
joint products being produced ‘P1’ and ‘P2’ in the ratio of 60 : 40. Product ‘P1’ can be sold at split off
stage or can be further processed in department Y and sold as a new product ‘YP1’. The input output
ratio of department Y is 100 : 95. Department Y is utilized only for further processing of product ‘P1’ to
product ‘YP1’. Individual departmental expenses are as follows:
Answer
Working Notes:
Input output ratio of material processed in Department X = 100 : 90
(i) Statement showing apportionment of joint costs in the ratio of net sales
Particulars Amount (` In lakhs)
Joint cost of P1 – 33% of ` 1,205 lakhs 397.65
Joint cost of P2 – 67% of `1,205 lakhs 807.35
Total 1,205.00
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.15
`142,500
Gross margin (%) 100 8%
`17,81,250
(ii) Chocolate powder liquor base (Amount in `)
Sales value Physical Estimated Constant
at Split off Measure net Gross
Realisable Margin
Value NRV
Final sale value of 5,70,000 5,70,000 5,70,000 5,70,000
chocolate powder
Less : Separable Costs 3,02, 812.50 3,02,812.50 3,02,812.50 3,02,812.50
Less: Joint Costs 2,49,375 2,85,000 2,22,656.25 2,21,587.50
Gross Margin 17,812.50 (17,812.50) 44531.25 45,600
Gross Margin (%) 3.125% (3.125%) 7.8125% 8.00%
(iii) Further processing of Chocolate powder liquor base into Chocolate powder
(Amount in `)
Incremental revenue {` 5,70,000 – (` 997.50 x 300 gallon)} 2,70,750
Less: Incremental costs 3,02,812.50
Incremental operating income (32,062.50)
B. By– Product :
Question 8
A company manufactures one main product (M1) and two by-products B1 and B2. For the month of
January 2013, following details are available:
Total Cost upto separation Point ` 2,12,400
M1 B1 B2
Cost after separation – ` 35,000 ` 24,000
No. of units produced 4,000 1,800 3,000
Selling price per unit ` 100 ` 40 ` 30
Estimated net profit as percentage to – 20% 30%
sales value
Estimated selling expenses as 20% 15% 15%
percentage to sales value
There are no beginning or closing inventories. Prepare
statement showing:
(i) Allocation of joint cost; and
(ii) Product-wise and overall profitability of the company for January 2013.
Answer
(i) Statement showing allocation of Joint Cost
Particulars B1 B2
No. of units Produced 1,800 3,000
Selling Price Per unit (`) 40 30
Sales Value (`) 72,000 90,000
Less: Estimated Profit (B1 -20% & B2 -30%) (14,400) (27,000)
Cost of Sales 57,600 63,000
Less: Estimated Selling Expenses (B1 -15% & B2 –15%) (10,800) (13,500)
Cost of Production 46,800 49,500
Less: Cost after separation (35,000) (24,000)
Joint Cost allocated 11,800 25,500
(ii) Statement of Profitability
Particulars M1 (`) B1 (`) B2 (`)
Sales Value (A) 4,00,000 72,000 90,000
(4,000 × `100)
Less: –Joint Cost 1,75,100 11,800 25,500
(2,12,400 –11,800 –
25,500)
– Cost after separation – 35,000 24,000
– Selling Expenses 80,000 10,800 13,500
(M1- 20%, B1-15% & B2-
15%)
(B) 2,55,100 57,600 63,000
Chapter : 11 Joint Product and By Product 11.20
43,200 34,500
**************************
Chapter 12 : Service Costing 12.1
Section – A
(A) Calculation of Absolute Tonne-Km and Commercial Tonne-Km.
Questioin 1—
Calculate total passenger kilometres from the following information:
Number of buses 6, number of days operating in a month 25, trips made by each bus per day 8, distance
covered 20 kilometres (one side), capacity of bus 40 passengers, normally 80% of capacity utilization.
Answer:
Calculation of passenger kilometer:
= 6 buses × 25 days × 8 trips × 2 sides × 20 k.m. × 40 passengers × 80%
= 15,36,000 passenger km.
Question 2—
A lorry starts with a load of 24 tonnes of goods from station A. It unloads 10 tonnes at station B and rest
of goods at station C. It reaches back directly to station A after getting reloaded with 18 tonnes of goods
at station C. The distance between A to B, B to C and then from C to A are 270 kms, 150 kms and 325
kms respectively. Compute 'Absolute tonnes km.' and 'Commercial tones-km'.
Answer:
Absolute tonnes km.:
= Weight in tonnes × Distance in km.
= From A to B + from B to C + from C to A
= (24 tonnes × 270 km.) + (14 tons × 150 km.) + (18 tonnes × 325 km.)
= 6,480 tonnes-km. + 2,100 tonnes-km. + 5,850 tonnes-km.
= 14,430 tonnes-km.
Commercial Tonnes km.
= Average weight load × Total distance (km.) travelled
24 14 18
=
3 Tonnes 745 km.
= 13,906.67 Tonnes km
3,000K.m.
2,500 6,250
1,200K.m.
3,000K.m.
52 15,600
10K.m.
Statement showing the Operating Cost per Passenger-km.
50,000
Annual Tax (p.m.) 4,166.67
12
Garage Rent 2,500 28,500
(ii) Maintenance Charges:
1,50,000
Repair & Maintance per month 12,500
12
1,20,466.67
1,20,000
= 1.004 (appx.)
30,000
Servicing Cost 754kms. 452.40
50,000kms
Chauffeur's meal cost (three 200 km. completed journey × 50 150.00
Other Allocable costs:
12,00,000
Depreciation 754kms. 377.00
24,00,000kms
2,400
Other set-up and office cost 3days 240.00
30 days
12,000
Chauffeur's salary 3days 1,200.00 1,817.00
30 days
Total Cost 5,054.40
Add: Profit (25% of net taking or 1/3rd of total cost) 1,684.80
6,739.20
Add: Service Tax @ 12.36% 832.97
Price of the package (inclusive of service tax) 7,572.17
Working Notes
(1) Total distance of journey
From To Distance (in Km.)
Delhi Jaipur 274
Jaipur Agra 238
Agra Delhi 242
Total Distance 754
7,25,800
0.18
40,32,000Passenger – Km.
Total Takings
One way fare per passenger 30Km.
Total Passenger – Km.
60 minutes 60 minutes
20km. 30km.
30km 30km
Up-loading time 10 minutes 10 minutes
Loading time 30 minutes 20 minutes
Total operated time 80 minutes or 90 minutes or
1 hour 20 minutes 1 hour 30 minutes
(2) Effective tones – km 50 75
(5 tonnes × 10 km.) (5 tonnes ×15 km.)
Question 8—
A transport company has a fleet of three trucks of 10 tonnes capacity each plying in different directions for
transport of customer's goods. The trucks run loaded with goods and return empty. The distance travelled,
number of trips made and the load carried per day by each truck are as under:
Truck One way No. of trips Load carried
No. Distance Km per day per trip / day
tonnes
1 16 4 6
2 40 2 9
3 30 3 8
The analysis of maintenance cost and the total distance travelled during the last two years is as under
Year Total distance Maintenance
travelled Cost
1 1,60,200 46,050
2 1,56,700 45,175
The following are the details of expenses for the year under review:
Diesel 10 per litre. Each litre gives 4 km per litre of diesel on an
average.
Driver's salary 2,000 per month
Licence and taxes 5,000 per annum per truck
Insurance 5,000 per annum for all the three vehicles
Purchase Price per truck 3,00,000, Life 10 years. Scrap value at the end of life is
10,000.
Oil and sundries 25 per 100 km run.
General Overhea d 11,084 per annum
6,00,436
= 4.4548
1,34,784 Kms
(iii) Freight rate per tonne km (to yield a profit of 10% on freight)
Total annual cost of three vehicles
Cost per toone km. (Refer to Working Note 1)
Total effective tonnes kms. per annum
6,00,436
= 1.143
5,25,312 Kms
46,050 – 45,175
= 1,60,200 kms – 1,56,700 kms 0.25
A. Running Costs:
- Cost of diesel(Working Note-2) 1,25,280 70,992 92,800 2,89,072
4. Calculation of Depreciation
Ramgarh Pratapgarh Devgarh
No. of vehicles 4 3 5
Cost of a vehicles 11,02,000 13,12,000 9,25,000
Total Cost of vehicles 44,08,000 39,36,000 46,25,000
Depreciation per month 36,733 32,800 38,542
Clerk 01 4,000
You are required to calculate:
(i) the cost of maintaining the library per year excluding the cost of new books;
(ii) the cost incurred per member per month on the library excluding cost of new books; and
(iii) the net income from the library per year.
If the club follows a policy that all new books must be purchased out of library revenue
(a) What is the maximum number of books that can be purchased per year and
(b) How many excess books are being purchased by the library per year?
Also, comment on the subsidy policy of the club
Answer :
( ) ( )
Total Revenue
Library fees per month (1,000 members × 100) 1,00,000
Late fees per month (500 times × 5 books × 1) 2,500
Total Revenue per month 1,02,500
Total Revenue per annum ( 1,02,500 × 12 months) 12,30,000
5 kgs.
Vita–x 5,000kgs. 2,500 kgs.
10 kgs
3 kgs.
Proto–D 5,000kgs. 1,500 kgs.
10 kgs
3 kgs.
Mine–L 5,000kgs. 1,500 kgs.
10 kgs
6 kgs.
Vita–X 5,000kgs. 3,000 kgs. = 3,000 kgs.
10 kgs
2.5 kgs.
Proto–D 5,000kgs. 1,250 kgs.
10 kgs
3 kgs.
Mine–L 5,000kgs. 1,000 kgs.
10 kgs
*** Revised Standard Quantity (RSQ):
5 kgs.
Vita–X 5,250kgs. 2,386 kgs.
11 kgs
3 kgs.
Proto–D 5,250kgs. 1,432 kgs.
11 kgs
3 kgs.
Mine–L 5,250kgs. 1,432 kgs.
11 kgs
(i) Material Cost Variance = (Std.Qty. × Std. Price) – (Actual Qty. × Acutal Price)
Or = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
Vita–X = 2,75,000 – 3,45,000 = 70,000 (A)
Proto–D = 4,80,000 – 4,12,500 = 67,500 (F)
Mine–L = 6,90,000 – 4,05,000 = 2,85,000 (F)
2,82,500 (F)
(ii) Material Price Variance = Actual Quantity (Std. Price – Actual Price)
= (AQ × SP) – (AQ × AP)
Vita-X = 3,30,000 – 3,45,000 = 15,000 (A)
Proto–D = 4,00,000 – 4,12,500 = 12,500 (A)
Mine–L = 4,60,000 – 4,05,000 = 55,000 (F)
27,500 (F)
(iii) Material Usage Variance = Std. Price (Std. Qty. – Actual Qty.)
Or = (SQ × SP) – (AQ × SP)
Vita–X = 2,75,000 – 3,30,000 = 55,000 (A)
Proto-D = 4,80,000 – 4,00,000 = 80,000 (F)
Mine-L = 6,90,000 – 4,60,000 = 2,30,000 (F)
2,55,000 (F)
Standard Actual
Category of No. of Wage Rate No. of Wage Rate
Workers workers per hour ( ) workers per hour
( )
Skilled 65 45 50 50
Semi-skilled 20 30 30 35
Unskilled 15 15 20 10
Standard output: 2,000 units; Actual output: 1,800 units Abnormal Idle time 2 hours in the week
Calculate:
(i) Labour Cost Variance
(ii) Labour Efficiency Variance
(iii) Labour Idle Time Variance.
Skilled 2,340 hrs. 45 1,05,300 2000 hrs. 50 1,00,000 100 hrs. 1,900
[(65 (50 (50 hrs.
workers × workers × Workers (2,000
40 hrs.)/ 40 hrs.) × 2 hrs.) hrs. –
2,000 100 hrs.)
units)]
×1,800
units
Unskilled 540 hrs. 15 8,100 800 hrs. 10 8,000 40 hrs. 760 hrs.
[(15 (20 (20 (800 hrs.
Workers × Workers Workers – 40
40 hrs.) ×40 hrs.) × 2hrs.) hrs.)
/2,000
units] ×
1,800 units
Calculation of Variances
(i) Labour Cost Variance = Standard Cost for actual output - Actual cost Skilled worker
= 1,05,300 – 1,00,000
= 5,300 (F)
Semi-skilled worker = 21,600 – 42,000
= 20,400 (A)
Unskilled Worker = 8,100 – 8,000
= 100 (F)
Total = 5,300 (F) + 20,400 (A) + 100 (F)
= 15,000 (A)
SH
(ii) Labour Efficiency 100 105.3
AH
AH 105.3 17,094 105.3
SH
100 100
= 17,999.982
= SH= 18,000 hours
(iii) Labour Efficiency Variance = SR(SH – AH)
= 8(18,000 – 17,094)
= 8 × 906
= 7,248 (F)
18,000 8
(iv) Standard Labour Cost per unit 24
6,000
17,094 12
(v) Actual Labour Cost Per Unit 34.19
6,000
(C) Overhead Variabnces
Question 7—
SJ Ltd. has furnished the following information:
Standard overhead absorption rate per unit 20
Standard rate per hour 4
Budgeted Production 12,000 units
Actual production 15,560 units
Actual overheads were 2,95,000 out of which 62,500 fixed.
Actual hours 74,000
Overheads are based on the following flexible budget
Production (units) 8,000 10,000 14,000
Total Overheads( ) 1,80,000 2,10,000 2,70,000
You are required to calculate the following overhead variances (on hour's basis) with appropriate workings:
(i) Variable overhead efficiency and expenditure variance
(ii) Fixed overhead efficiency and capacity variance.
Answer—
Workings:
(a) Variable Overhead rate per unit
2,10,000 – 1,80,000
15
10,000 units – 8,000 units
(b) Fixed Overhead = 1,80,000 – (8,000 units × 15) = 60,000
20
5 hours
4
15
3
5 hours
(e) Standard Fixed Overhead Rate per hour = 4– 3= 1
(f) Actual Variable Overhead = 2,95,000 – 62,500= 2,32,500
2,32,500
(g) Actual Variable Overhead Rate Per Hour 3.1419
74,000 hours
(h) Budgeted hours = 12,000 units × 5 hours = 60,000 hours
(i) Standard Hours for Actual Production = 15,560 units × 5 hours = 77,800 hours
(j) Variable Overhead Efficiency and Expenditure Variance:
Variable Overhead Efficiency Variance = Std. Rate per hour (Std. Hours – Actual Hours)
= 3 (77,800 hours × 74,000 hours)
= 11,400 (F)
Variable Overhead Expenditure Variance = Actual Hours (Std. Rate – Actual Rate)
= 74,000 hours ( 3 – 3.1419)
= 10,500(A)
(ii) Fixed overhead efficiency and capacity variance:
Fixed overhead efficiency variance = std. Rate per hour (std. hours – Actual hours)
= 1 (77,800 hours – 74,000 hours)= 3,800 (F)
Fixed overheads capacity variance = Std. Rate per hour (Actual Hours – budgeted Hours)
= 1 (74,000 hours – 60,000 hours) = 74,000 – 60,000 = 14,000 (f)
12,000
Standard Variable Overhead rate per unit 3
4,000 units
40,000
Standard Fixed Overhead rate per unit 10
4,000 units
(a) Variable Overhead Variance = Recovered Variable Overhead – Actual Variable overhead
= 3,800 units × 3 – 12,000
= 11,400 – 12,000 = 600 (Adverse)
(b) (i) Fixed Overhead Expenditure Variabnce = Budgeted Overhead – Actual Overhead
= 40,000 – 39,000
= 1,000 (Favourable)
(ii) Fixed Overhead Volume Variable = Recovered Overhead – Budgeted Overhead
= 3,800 units × 10 – 40,000
= 38,000 – 40,000
= 2,000 (Adverse)
(D) Mix
Question 9—
SB Constructions Limited has entered into a big contract at an agreed price of 1,50,00,000 subject to an
escalation clause for material and labour as spent out on the contract and corresponding details are as
follows:
Standard Actual
Material: Quantity Rate per Ton Quantity Rate per Ton
(Tons) ( ) (Tons) ( )
A 3,000 1,000 3,400 1,100
B 2,400 800 2,300 700
C 500 4,000 600 3,900
D 100 30,000 90 31,500
Hours Hourly Rate Hours Hourly Rate
Labour
( ) ( )
L1 60,000 15 56,000 18
L2 40,000 30 38,000 35
You are required to:
Calculate the following variance and verify them:
(a) Material Cost Variance
(b) Material Price Variance
(c) Material Usage Variance
(d) Labour Cost Variance
(e) Labour Rate Variance
(f) Labour Efficiency Variance.
Answer—
Material Variances
L1– 60,000 ×15 = 9,00,000 56,000 ×18 =10,08,000 56,000 ×15 = 8,40,000
P 4,000 25 4,800 30
Q 3000 50 2,800 45
R 2000 75 2,400 70
9,000
50( 8 hours – 7,000 hrs.)
10
= 50 (7,200 hrs. - 7,000 hrs.)
= 10,000 (Favourable)
(v) Labour Rate Variance = Actual Hours (Std. Rate - Actual Rate)
= 7,000 hrs. ( 50 – 52)
= 14,000 (Adverse)
(vi) Labour Cost Variance = Std. Labour Cost - Actual Labour Cost
= (SH × SR) – (AH × AR)
= (7,200 hrs. × 50) – (7,000 hrs. × 52)
= 3,60,000 – 3,64,000
200
9,000 kgs. – 1,92,000
10 kgs.
= 1,80,000 – 1,92,000 = 12,000 (Adverse)
Question 13—
ABC Ltd. had prepared the following estimation for the month of April:
Quantity Rate ( ) Amount ( )
Material 800 kg. 45.00 36,000
Material 600 kg. 30.00 18,000
Skilled Labour 1,000 hours 37.50 37,500
Unskillled Labour 800 hours 22.00 17,600
Normal loss was expected to be 10% of total input materials and an idle labour time of 5% of expected
labour hours was also estimated.
At the end of the month the following information has been collected from the cost accounting depart-
ment:
The company has produced 1,480 kg. finished product by using the followings:
Quantiry Rate ( ) Amount ( )
Material - A 900 kg. 43.00 38,700
Material - B 650 kg. 32.50 21,125
Skilled Labour 1,200 hours 35.50 42,600
Unskilled labour 860 hours 23.00 19,780
You are required to calculate:
(a) Material Cost Variance;
(b) Material Price Variance;
(c) Material Mix Variance;
(d) Material Yield Variance;
(e) Labour Cost Variance;
(f) Labour Efficiency Variance and
(g) Labour Yield Variance.
Answer—
Material Variances:
A 940 kg. 45.00 42,300 886 kg. 39,870 900 kg. 40,500 43.00 38,700
B 705 kg. 30.00 21,150 664 kg. 19,920 650 kg. 19,500 32.50 21,125
800kg.
Material A– 1,480kg. 939.678 or 940kg.
0.9 1,400 kg.
600kg.
Material B– 1,480kg. 704.76 or705kg.
0.9 1,400 kg.
WN –2 Revised Standard Quantity (RSQ):
800 kg.
Material A– 1550 kg. 885.71or 886kg.
1,400 kg.
600 kg.
Material B– 1550 kg. 664.28 or 664kg.
1,400 kg.
(a) Material Cost Variance (A+B) = {(SQ × SP) – (AQ ×AP)}
= {63,450 – 59,825} = 3625 (F)
(b) Material Price Variance (A + B) = {(AQ × SP) – (AQ×AP)}
= {60,000 – 59,825} = 175 (F)
(c) Material Mix Variance (A + B) = {(RSQ × SP) – (AQ × SP)}
= {59,790 – 60,000} = 210 (A)
(d) Material Yield Variance (A + B) = {(SQ × SP) – (RSQ × SP)}
= {63,450 –59,790} = 3,660(F)
Labour Variance:
Labour SH SR SH ×SR RSH RSH × SR AH AH × SR AR AH × AR
(WN –3) ( ) ( ) (WN–4) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Skilled 1,116 hrs. 37.50 41,850 1144 42,900 1,200 45,000 35.50 42,600
Unskilled 893 hrs 22.00 19,646 916 20,152 860 18,920 23.00 19,780
1,000 hr.
Skilled labour – 2,060hr. 1,144.44 or 1,144hrs.
1,800hr
800 hr.
Unskilled Labour – 2,060 hr. 915.56 or 916 hrs.
1,800hr
(e) Labour Cost Variance (Skilled + Unskilled) = {(SH × SR) - (AH × AR)}
= {61,496 - 62,380} = 884 (A)
(f) Labour Efficiency Variance (Skilled + Unskilled) = {(SH × SR) - (AH × SR)}
= {61,496 - 63,920} = 2,424 (A)
(g) Labour Yield Variance (Skilled + Unskilled) = {(SH × SR) - (RSH × SR)}
= {61,496 - 63,052} = 1,556 (A)
Question 14—
KPR Limited operates a system of standard costing in respect of one of its products which is
manufactured within a single cost centre. The Standard Cost Card of a product is as under:
Standard Unit cost ( )
Direct Material 5kg. @ 4.20 21.00
Direct Labour 3hours @ 3.00 9.00
Factory Overhead 1.20 per labour hour 3.60
Total manufacturing cost 33.60
The production schedule for the month of June, 2013 required completion of 40,000 units. However, 40,960
units were completed during the month without opening and closing work-in- process inventories.
Purchases during the month of June, 2013, 2,25,000 kg. of material at the rate of 4.50 per kg. Production
and Sales records for the month showed the following actual results.
Material used 2,05,600 kg.
Direct labour 1,21,200 hours; cost incurred 3,87,840
Total factory overhead cost incurred 1,00,000
Sales 40,000 units
Selling price to be so fixed as to allow a mark-up of 20 per cent on selling price.
Required:
(i) Calculate material variances based on consumption of material.
Marginal Costing ( )
Sales (as above) 36,12,000
Less: Cost of goods sold (Refer the working note) (17,80,917)
18,31,083
Less: Selling & Distribution Expenses (4,30,000)
Contribution 14,01,083
Less: Fixed Factory and Selling & Distribution Overhead
( 3,84,000 + 7,60,000) (11,44,000)
Profit 2,57,083
(ii) Under or over absorption of Overhead:
( )
Fixed Overhead:
Budgeted ( 6 × 72,000 hours) 4,32,000
Actual ( 4,32,000 – 48,000) 3,84,000
Over–absorption 48,000
Variable Overhead:
Budgeted ( 4 × 72,000 hours) 2,88,000
Actual ( 2,88,000 + 20,000) 3,08,000
Under-absorption 20,000
(iii) Reconciliation of Profit:
Difference in Profit: 3,02,083 – 2,57,083 = 45,000
Due to Fixed Factory Overhead being included in Closing Stock in Absorption Costing not in Marginal
Costing.
Therefore, Difference in Profit = Fixed Overhead Rate (Production - Sale)
= 18 (24,000 – 21,500) = 45,000
Working Note:
Calculation of Cost of Goods Sold
Absorption Costing Marginal Costing
Direct Material ( 16×24,000) 3,84,000 3,84,000
Direct Labour ( 54 ×24,000) 12,96,000 12,96,000
Variable OH ( 12×24,000 × 20,000) 3,08,000 3,08,000
( 12×24,000 + 20,000)
Fixed Overhead ( 18 × 24,000) 4,32,000 –
24,20,000 19,88,000
Add: Opening Stock – –
Less: Closing Stock (2,52,083) (2,07,083)
24,20,000 19,88,000
(24,000–21,500) 2,500 units 2,500 units
24,000 units 24,000 units
1,44,00,000
Less: Closing Stock 50,000 units * (20,00,000)
3,60,000 units
Variable cost of production of 3,10,000 units 1,24,00,000
Add: Variable selling expenses @ 12 per unit 37,20,000 1,61,20,000
88,80,000
Less: Fixed production cost 24,00,000
Fixed selling expenses 16,00,000 (40,00,000)
Actual profit under marginal Costing 46,80,000
* Closing stock = 40,000 + 3,20,000 – 3,10,000 = 50,0000 units
1,47,20,000
Add: Opening Stock: 40,000 18,40,000
3,20,000 units
1,65,60,000
Less: Closing Stock : 50,000 (23,00,000)
3,60,000 units
Production cost of 3,10,000 units 1,42,60,000
Adjustment for Over /under-absorption:
Under absorption of fixed production overheads(2) 4,80,000
Cost of Goods Sold 1,47,40,000
Selling Expenses:
Variable : 12 × 3,10,000 units 37,20,000
Fixed 16,00,000 (2,00,60,000)
Actual Profit under absorption costing 47,40,000
Workings:
24,00,000
1. Absorption rate for fixed cost of production = 6 per unit
4,00,000 units
2. Fixed production overhead under absorbed = (24,00,000 – 19,20,000) = 4,80,000
Question 3—
PQ Ltd. reports the following cost structure at two capacity levels:
(100% capacity) (75% capacity)
2,000 units 1,500 units
Production overhead I 3 per unit 4 per unit
Production overhead II 2 per unit 2 per unit
If the selling price, reduced by direct material and labour is 8 per unit, what would be its break-even point?
6,16,000
Or x 2,800 units
220
Break- even point of Product J = 4 × 2,800 = 11,200 units
Break even point of Product K = 3 × 2,800 = 8,400 units
Question 5—
MFN Limited started its operation in 2012 with the total production capacity of 2,00,000 units. The
following data for two years is made available to you:
2012 2013
Sales units 80,000 1,20,000
Total cost ( ) 34,40,000 45,60,000
There has been no change in the cost structure and selling price and it is expected to continue in 2014 as
well. Selling price is 40 per unit.
You are required to calculate:
(i) Break-Even Point (in units)
(ii) Profit at 75% of the total capacity in 2014
11,20,000
28 per unit
40,000 units
Total Fixed Cost ( ) = 45,60,000 – ( 1,20,000 units × 28) = 12,00,000
Fixed Cost
(i) Break-even point (in units)
Contribution per unit
12,00,000
1,00,000 unit
( 40 – 28)
(ii) Profit at 75% Capacity in 2014
= (2,000 units × 75%) × Contribution per unit – Fixed Cost
= 1,50,000 units × 12– 12,00,000 = 6,00,000.
Question 6—
Zed Limited sells its product at 30 per unit. During the quarter ending on 31st March, 2014, it produced
and sold 16,000 units and' suffered a loss of 10 per unit. If the volume of sales is raised to 40,000 units; it
can earn a profit of 8 per unit.
You are required to calculate:
(i) Break Even Point in Rupees.
(ii) Profit if the sale volume is 50,000 units.
(iii) Minimum level of production where the company needs not to close the production if unavoidable
fixed cost is 1,50,000.
Answer—
Units sold Sales value ( ) Profit/ (loss) ( )
16,000 units 4,80,000 (1,60,000)
( 30 × 16000 units) ( 10×16,000 units)
40,000 units 12,00,000 3,20,000
( 30 × 40,000 units) ( 8 × 40,000 units)
Fixed Cost
(i) Break-even Point in Rupees
P/V Ratio
4,80,000
. 7,20,000
66.67%
(ii) If sales volume is 50,000 units, then profit = Sales Value × P/V Ratio – Fixed Cost
= (50,000 units × 30 × 66.67% – 4,80,000)
= 5,20,000
(iii) Minimum level of production where the company needs not to close the production, if unaboidable
fixed cost is 1,50,000:
2,80,000 70,000
Fixed Cost Desired Profit 12,50,000
28%
P/V Ratio
Question 8—
The P/V Ratio of Delta Ltd. is 50% and margin of safety is 40%. The company sold 500 units for `
5,00,000. You are required to calculate:
(i) Break- even point, and
(ii) Sales in units to earn a profit of 10% on sales
Answer—
(i) P/V Ratio – 50% Margin of Safety – 40%,
Sales 500 Units for 5,00,000 Selling price per Unit – 1,000
Calculation of Break Even Point (BEP)
Sales – BEP
Margin of Safety Ratio 100
Sales
5,00,000 –BEP
40 100
5,00,000
BEP (In sales) = 3,00,000
BEP (in Unit) 3,00,000 ÷ 1,000 = 300 units
(ii) Sales in units to earn a profit of 10% on sales
1,50,000 0.1x
x =
50 %
Or, x = 3,75,000
To find out sales in units amount of slaes 3,75,000 is to be dividend by selling Price per unit
Thus—
3,75,000
Sales (in units) 375 units
1,000
Working Notes:
1. Selling Price = 5,00,000 ÷ 500 = 1,000 per Unit
2. Variable cost per unit = Selling Price – (Selling Price ×PV Ratio)
Profit
Margin of Safety
P/V Ratio
Margin of Safety = 40% of 5,00,000= 2,00,000
Profit
2,00,000
50%
Profit = 1,00,000
4. Fixed Cost = (Sales × P/V Ratio) – Profit
= ( 5,00,000 × 50%) – 1,00,000 = 1,50,000
(Note: Alternative ways of calculation of 'Break Even Point' and required sales to earn a profit of 10% of
sales' can be adopted to solve the problem.)
Question 9—
Maxim Ltd. manufactures a product "N-joy". In the month of August 2014, 14,000 units of the product "N-
joy" were sold, the details are as under:
( )
Sale Revenue 2,52,000
Direct Material 1,12,000
Direct Labour 49,000
Variable Overheads 35,000
Fixed Overheads 28,000
A forecast for the month of September 2014 has been carried out by the General manger of Maxim Ltd. As
per the forecast, price of direct material and variable overhead will be increased by 10% and 5% respec-
tively.
Required to calculate:
(i) Number of units to be sold to maintain the same quantum of profit that made in August 2014.
(ii) Margin of safety in the month of August 2014 and September 2014.
Answer—
Calculation of Profit made in the month of August 2014 by selling 14,000 units.
Amount per unit ( ) Amount ( )
Sales Revenue 18.00 2,52,000
Less: Variable Costs:
– Direct Material 8.00 1,12,000
– Direct Labour 3.50 49,000
Variable Overhead 2.50 35,000
Contribution 4.00 56,000
Less: Fixed Overhead 2.00 28,000
Profit 2.00 28,000
Question 10—
Maximum Production capacity of KM (P) Ltd. is 28000 units per month. Output at different levels along
with cost data is furnished below:
Activity Level
Particulars of Costs 16,000 units 18,000 units 20,000 units
Direct Material 12,80,000 14,40,000 16,00,000
6,30,000
x 2,10,000 units
3
Sales value= 2,10,000 units × 20 = 42,00,000 to earn of 10% on sales.
(b) Sales price to bring down BEP to 1,20,000 units
6,30,000
Or, Contribution per unit 5.25
1,20,000 units
So, Sales Price = 15 + 5.25 = 20.25
Profit 60,000
(c) Margin of Safety Sales Or,
P/V Ratio P/V Ratio
Contribution 1,50,000
P/V Ratio 100 100 50%
Sales 3,00,000
(i) If in the next period company suffered a loss of 30,000, then
Contribution = Fixed Cost Profit
= 90,000 – 30,000 (as it is a loss) = 60,000
Contribution 60,000
Then Sales or 1,20,000
P/V ratio 50%
So, there will be loss of 30,000 at sales of 1,20,000.
Profit 90,000
(ii) Margin of Safety 180 ,000
PV Ratio 50 %
Alternative solution of this part:
Chagne in profit
(a) P/V Ratio 100
Change in sales
40
57,00,000 7,00,000
100
= 22, 80,000 – 7,00,000 = 15,80,000
(c) Contribution required to earn a profit of 12,00,000
= Total fixed cost + Profit required
= 15,80,000 + 12,00,000 = 27,80,000
27,80,000 27,80,000
Required Sales 69,50,000
P/V Ratio 40%
Question 14—
MNP Ltd sold 2,75,000 units of its product at 37.50 per unit. Variable costs are 17.50 per unit (manufac-
turing costs of 14 and selling cost 3.50 per unit). Fixed costs are incurred uniformly throughout the year
and amount to 35,00,000 (including depreciation of 15,00,000). there are no beginning or ending invento-
ries. Required:
(i) Estimate breakeven sales level quantity and cash breakeven sales level quantity.
(ii) Estimate the P/V ratio.
(iii) Estimate the number of units that must be sold to earn an income (EBIT) of 2,50,000.
(iv) Estimate the sales level achieve an after-tax income (PAT) of 2,50,000. Assume 40% corporate
Income Tax rate.
Contribution/unit 20
(ii) P/V ratio 100 100 53.33%
Selling Price / unit 37.50
(iii) No. of units that must be sold to earn an Income (EBIT) of 2,50,000
2,50,000
Desired level of Profit before tax 100 4,16,667
60
Fixed Cost Desired Profit
Estimate Sales Level
P/V ratio
35,00,000 4,16,667
73,43,750
53.33%
Question 15—
The following figures are related to LM Limited for the year ending 31st March, 2014 : Sales – 24,000 units
@ 200 per unit;
P/V Ratio 25% and Break-even Point 50% of sales. You are required to calculate:
(i) Fixed cost for the year
(ii) Profit earned for the year
(iii) Units to be sold to earn a target net profit of 11,00,000 for a year.
(iv) Number of units to be sold to earn a net income of 25% on cost.
(v) Selling price per unit if Break-even Point is to be brought down by 4,000 units.
Answer—
Break- even point (in units) is 50% of sales i.e. 12,000 units.
Hence, Break- even point (in sales value) is 12,000 units × 200 = 24,00,000
17,00,000
No. of units 34,000 unit
50per unit
So, 34,000 units to be sold to earn a target net profit of 11,00,000 for a year.
(iv) Net desired total Sales (Number of unit × Selling price) be x then desired profit is 25% on Cost or
20% on Sales i.e. 0.2 x
1,20,00,000
No. of units to be sold 60,000 units
200
(v) If Break- even point is to be brought down by 4,000 units then Break-even point will be
12,000 units – 4,000 units = 8,000 units
Let Selling price be x and fixed cost and variable cost per unit remain unchanged i.e.
6,00,000 and 150 respectively.
18,00,000
Or, x 225
8,000
Selling Price should be 225
Hence, selling price per unit shall be 225 if Break-even point is to be brought down by 4,000 units
Question 16—
Arnav Ltd. manufacture and sales its product R-9. The following figures have been collected from cost
records of last year for the product R-9:
Elements of Cost Variable Cost portion Fixed Cost
Direct Material 30% of Cost of Goods Sold –
Direct Labour 15% of Cost of Goods Sold –
Factory Overhead 10% of Cost of Goods Sold 2,30,000
General & Administration Overhead 2% of Cost of Goods Sold 71,000
Selling & Distribution Overhead 4% of Cost of Sales 68,000
Last Year 5,000 units were sold at 185 per unit. From the given data find the followings:
(a) Break-even Sales (in rupees)
(b) Profit earned during last year
(c) Margin of safety (in %)
(d) Profit if the sales were 10% less than the actual sales.
Answer—
Working Notes:
(i) Calcualtion of Cost of Goods Sold (COGS):
= {(DM- 0.3 COGS) + (DL- 0.15 COGS) + (FOH- 0.10 COGS + 2,30,000)
+ (G&AOH- 0.02 COGS + 71,000)}
Or COGS = 0.57 COGS + 3,01,000
3,01,000
Or COGS 7,00,000
0.43
(ii) Calculaton of Cost of Sales (COS):
COS = COGS + (S &DOH– 0.04 COS + 68,000)
Or COS = 7,00,000 + (0.04 COS + 68,000)
7,68,000
Or COS 8,00,000
0.96
9,25,000 – 6,90,882
100 25.31%
9,25,000
(d) Profit if the sales were 10% less than the actual sales:
Profit = 90% ( 9,25,000 – 4,31,000) – 3,69,000
= 4,44,600 – 3,69,000 = 75,600
Question 17—
Maryanne Petrochemicals Ltd. is operating at 80 % capacity and presents the following information:
Break-even Sales 400 crores
P/V Ratio 30 %
Margin of Safety 120 crores
Contribution 25.2
Revised P/V Ratio = 100 100 28%
Sales 90
Fixed Cost 185crores
(ii) (a) Revised Break-even Sales 100 660.71 crores
P/V Ratio 28%
(b) Revised P/V Ratio = 28% (as calculated above)
(c) Revised Margin of safety = Total Sales – Break-even Sales
= 860.71 crores – 660.71 crores
= 200 crores.
Question 18—
SHA Limited provides the following trading results:
Year Sale Profit
2012-13 25,00,000 10% of Sale
2013-14 20,00,000 8% of Sale
You are required to calculate:
(i) Fixed Cost
(ii) Break Even Point
(iii) Amount of profit, if sale is 30,00,000
(iv) Sale, when desired profit is 4,75,000
(v) Margin of Safety at a profit of 2,70,000
Answer—
Workings:
Profit in year 2012-13 = 25,00,000 × 10% = 2,50,000
Profit in year 2013-14 = 20,00,000 × 8% = 1,60,000
Change in Profit
So, P/V Ratio 100
Change in Sales
Fixed Cost
(ii) Break-even Point (in Sales)
P/V Ratio
2,00,000
11,11,111( Approx )
18%
(iii) Calculation of profit, if sales is 30,00,000
Profit = Contribution – Fixed Csot = (Sales × P/V Ratio) – Fixed Cost
= ( 30,00,000 × 18%) – 2,00,000
= 5,40,000 – 2,00,000
= 3,40,000
So profit is 3,40,000, if Sale is 30,00,000.
(iv) Calculation of Sale, when desired Profit is 4,75,000
Contribution Required = Desired Profit + Fixed Cost
= 4,75,000 + 2,00,000
= 6,75,000
Contributi on 6,75,000
Sales 37,50,000
P/V Ratio 18%
Sales is 37,50,000 when desired profit is 4,75,000.
Profit
(v) Margin of Safety
P/V Ratio
2,70,000
15,00,000
18%
So Margin of Safety is 15,00,000 at a profit of 2,70,000
Question 19 —
ABC Limited started its operation in the year 2013 with a total production capacity of 2,00,000 units. The
following information, for two years, are made available to you:
Year Year
2013 2014
Sales (units) 80,000 1,20,000
Total Cost ( ) 34,40,000 45,60,000
There has been no change in the cost structure and selling price and it is anticipated that it will remain
unchanged in the year 2015 also.
Selling price is 40 per unit. Calculate:
(i) Variable cost per unit.
(ii) Profit Volume Ratio.
11,20,000
28
40,000 units
40 – 28
100 30%
40
Fixed Cost
(iii) Break-Even Point (in units)
Contribution per unit
Fixed Cost = Total Cost in 2013 - Total Variable Cost in 2013
= 34,40,000 – ( 28 × 80,000 units)
= 34,40,000 – 22,40,000
= 12,00,000
12,00,000
Therefore, Break-Even Point 1,00,000 units
12
(iv) Profit if the firm operates at 75% of the capacity:
Number of units to be produced and sold = 2,00,000 units × 75% = 1,50,000 units
Profit = Total contribution – Fixed Cost
Or, = 12 × 1,50,000 units – 12,00,000
Or, = 18,00,000 – 12,00,000
Or, Profit = 6,00,000
Question 20—
SK Lit. is engaged in the manufacture of tyres. Analysis of income statement indicated a profit of 150
lakhs on a sales volume of 50,000 units. The fixed costs are 850 lakhs which appears to be high. Existing
selling price is 3,400 per unit. The company is considering to revise the profit target to ` 350 lakhs. You are
required to compute—
(i) Break- even point at existing levels in units and in rupees.
(ii) The number of units required to be sold to earn the target profit.
(iii) Profit with 15% increase in selling price and drop in sales volume by 10%.
(iv) Volume to be achieved to earn target profit at the revised selling price as calculated in (ii) above, if
a reduction of 8% in the variable costs and 85 lakhs in the fixed cost is envisaged.
2,000
P/V Ratio 100 58.82%
3,400
FC 8,50,00,000
B.EP (Rupees) = 1,445 lakhs(approx)
P/V Ratio 58.82%
(ii) Number of units sold to achieve a target profit of 3,50,lakhs:
Desired Contribution = Fixed Cost + Target Profit
= 850 L + 350 L = 1,200L
DesiredContribution 12,00,00,000
Number of units to be sold 60,000 units
Contribution per unit 2,000
(iii) Profit if selling price is increased by 15% and sales volume drops by 10%: ]
Existing Selling Price per unit = 3,400
Revised selling price per unit = 3,400 × 115% = 3,910
Existing Sales Volume = 50,000 units
Revised sales volume = 50,000 units – 10% of 50,000 = 45,000 units.
Statement of profit at sales volume of 45,000 units @ 3910 per unit
Particulars Per unit ( ) Total ( In lakhs)
Sales 3,910.00 1,759.50
Less: Variable Costs 1,400.00 630.00
Contribution 2,510.00 1,129.50
Less: Fixed Cost 850.00
Profit 279.50
3,75,000
25
15,000 units
(ii) Profit = Sales Value - Total Cost
profit
(iii) Profit/Volume (P/v) Ratio 100
Margin of Safety in Rupee value
1,12,500
100 30%
3,75,000
(iv) Break Even Sales (in Rupees) = BEP units × Selling Price per unit
= 5,000 units × 25 = 1,25,000
(v) Fixed Cost = Contribution - Profit
= Sales Value × P/V Ratio - Profit
= ( 5,00,000 × 30%) – 1,12,500
= 1,50,000 – 1,12,500 = 37,500
************************
Fixed costs :
Manufacturing 2,28,000 2,28,000 2,28,000
72,000 72,000 72,000
Administration, Selling and
3,00,000 3,00,000 3,00,000
Distribution Total Fixed Costs:
Product A ( ) Product B ( )
6,000 Units 9,000 Units
Per unit Total Per unit Total
Sales 120.00 7,20,000 78.00 7,02,000
Finished goods inventory at the end of each month is expected to be 20% of budgeted sales quantity for the
following month. Finished goods inventory was 2,700 units on January 1, 2014. There would be no work-
in-progress at the end of any month.
Each unit of finished product requires two types of materials as detailed below:
Material X : 4 kg. @ 10/kg
Material Y : 6 kg. @ 15/kg
Material on hand on January 1, 2014 was 19,000 kg. of material X and 29,000 kg. of materialY. Monthly
closing stock of material is budgeted to be equal to half of the requirements of next month's production.
Budgeted direct labour hour per unit of finished product is ¾ hour.
Budgeted direct labour cost for the first quarter of the year 2014 is 10,89,000. Actual data for the quarter
one, ended on March 31, 2014 is as under:
10,89,000
40
27,225 hours
Standard labour hours for actual output:
28,320 13,160
0.96 0.94
(ii) Purchase budget (in kgs and value) for Material Z
Product M Product N
No. of units to be produced 29,500 14,000
Usage of Material Z per unit of production 5 kg. 6 kg.
Material needed for production 1,47,500 kg. 84,000 kg.
Materials to be pruchased 1,63,889 kg. 88,421 kg.
1,47,500 84,000
0.90 0.95
Total quantity to be purchased 2,52,310 kg.
Rate per kg. of Material Z 36
Total Puchase price 90,83,160
1,63,889 88,421
1,60,000 1,60,000
2,52,310 2,52,310
Less: Process wastage 10,393 kg. 2,804 kg.
Net Material available for production 93,536 kg. 53,267 kg.
Units to be produced 18,707 units 8,878 units
93,536 kg 53,267 kg
5 kg. 6 kg.
Question 8—
Calculate efficiency and activity ratio from the following data:
Capacity ratio = 75%
Budgeted output = 6,000 units
Actual output = 5,000 units
Standard Time per unit = 4 hours
Answer—
Actual Hours
Capacity Ratio 100
Budgeted Hours
AH
75%
6,000 units 4 hour per unit
AH
0.75%
24,000 Hours
AH = 18,000 Hours
Actual Output in terms of Standard Hours
Efficiency Ratio 100
Actual Working Hours
20,000Hours
100 111.11%
18,000 Hours
20,000 Units
100
6,000 Units 4 hour per unit
20,000 units
100
24,000 units
= 83.33%
Question 9—
AK Limited produces and sells a single product. Sales budget for calendar year 2013 by a quarters is as
under:
Quarters I II III IV
No. of units to be sold 18,000 22,000 25,000 27,000
The year is expected to open with an inventory of 6,000 units of finished products and close with inventory
of 8,000 units. Production is customarily scheduled to provide for 70% of the current quarter's sales demand
plus 30% of the following quarter demand. The budgeted selling price per unit is ` 40. The standard cost
details for one unit of the product are as follows:
Variable Cost 34.50 per unit
Fixed Overheads 2 hours 30 minutes @ 2 per hour based on a budgeted production volume of 1,10,000
direct labour hours for the year. Fixed overheads are evenly distributed through- out the year.
You are required to:
(i) Prepare Quarterly Production Budget for the year.
(ii) In which quarter of the year, company expected to achieve bread-even point.
Answer—
(i) Production Budget for the year 2013 by Quarters
I II III IV Total
Sales 18,000 22,000 25,000 27,000 92,000
I Opening Stock 6,000 7,200 8,100 8,700 30,000
II 70% of Current Quarter's Demand 12,600 15,400 17,500 18,900 64,400
III 30% of Following Quarter's Demand 6,600 7,500 8,100 7,400* 29,600
IV Total Production (II & III) 19,200 22,900 25,600 26,300 94,000
V Closing Stock (I+IV) 7,200 8,100 8,700 8,000 32,000