BM2312 004
BM2312 004
com
Abstract:
This study was conducted in Cameroon, specifically targeting consumers of Chocojoy products, and aimed to
investigate variables such as packaging color, material, label, and shape that may influence consumer purchasing
behavior. A questionnaire containing a series of systematically structured questions was distributed to the
respondents so that the researcher could obtain the necessary information from the respondents. A total of 400
questionnaires were administered to study respondents and 325 responses were received. We used the Cochrane
formula to determine the sample size from the total population. Chi-square was used to test the hypotheses. The
results showed that there is a relationship between packaging color, packaging material, packaging labeling, and
purchasing behavior. Packaging recommends that manufacturers should regularly assess how consumers respond to
their product packaging to make their products more competitive in the marketplace.
1. Introduction
After going through multiple problems with packaging quality with the previous suppliers from Turkey (lids,
weight, handle, firmness), Chocjoy decided to change suppliers and move from Turkey to China to produce the buckets.
This new plan allowed them to bring some change to the buckets.
The change consists of changing the bucket shape by moving from a round-shaped flat bottom to a round-shaped
concave bottom with the modification of the lids by adding an anti-slip effect on the lids to prevent slipping when piling up
buckets (physical innovation). The change consists of changing the labeling design and color, information (information
innovation) and technology by using the metal film labeling method of IML (in-mold labeling), the latest technology in the
labeling industry.
The package is the container of the product - it covers the physical appearance of the package as well as the
design, color, shape, label and materials used.
Now, packaging has become a promotional tool for organizations themselves, and at the same time, it increases
sales and market share. The buying behavior of the consumer is stimulated by the packaging materials, color, labels, shape
and other characteristics of the package. As the title suggests, the purpose of this study is to discover empirically the
importance of packaging elements and analyze their relationship with consumer purchasing behavior. The purpose of this
study is based on a hypothetical analysis of package components and their impact on consumer purchasing behavior.
A deep understanding of the results of this study using structured questionnaires is done to collect accurate
answers from respondents to improve communication and provide recommendations to marketers to improve their
understanding of customer purchase decisions.
2. Research Background
The brand has doubled the number of branches in the country. Far from mega-growth and massive investment in
overseas subsidiaries, it focuses primarily on small, local supermarkets that are close to customers. The group aims to
continue expanding the domestic Santa Lucia network through innovation. It also aims to cover as much as possible the
needs of large retailers in Cameroon and Africa in general. The company specializes in producing chocolate products from
cocoa mass. Customers are based in Cameroon, Nigeria and other Central and West African countries. CHOCOJOY's biggest
competitor is CHOCOCAM (Chocolateries du Cameroun), founded in 1965.
Since its founding, CHOCOJOY has had the same package design and shape. However, the variations in label colors
were limited, and the technology for bucket molding and labeling was not the latest. This has led to a decline in the
attractiveness of their products. Faced with this loss of appeal and the need to respond to current labeling technology,
CHOCOJOY decided to give the bucket image a new impetus and breathe new life into the chocolate market.
Figure 1
People have become more concerned about their health and are avoiding products containing sugar. In today's
world, it is important for consumers to know the ingredients and nutritional value of a product before purchasing it.
Deviations in food mixing ratios and contamination can pose major risks to businesses.
Economic uncertainty and the associated rising cost of goods have forced consumers to rethink budgets and
discretionary spending.
2.3.2.1.2. Transparency
A transparent governance structure is essential to foster a friendly business environment. Cameroon currently faces
several problems due to corruption and lack of transparency. Corruption increases fraud, increases the sophistication of
business activities such as licensing and contracts, weakens law enforcement, and impacts stakeholder trust in businesses
and government institutions.
• Government bureaucracy and interference in the packaging and container industry.
• Intellectual property protection
• Trade regulations and tariffs related to consumer goods.
• Price regulation
• Taxation – tax rates and incentives.
2.3.2.2. Economic Factors
• Quality of packaging and container industry infrastructure
• Skill levels of workers in the packaging and container industry.
• Labor costs and productivity
Economic growth rate: Slower economic growth could make consumers more cautious in their spending, which
could directly impact overall sales growth. - Exchange rates and interest rates.
Exchange rate fluctuations can affect a company's profitability.
creating an exciting growth opportunity for packaging manufacturers. However, as modern consumers have become more
sophisticated, it is important for the packaging industry to carefully analyze their consumption/spending behavior
preferences and adjust their marketing mix strategies accordingly.
• Level of education and level of education in the packaging industry.
• The broad nature of entrepreneurship and society.
• Attitudes (health, environmental awareness)
3. Research Methodology
Figure 2
than one (1) answer. Thereafter, questionnaires are gathered once they are done answering, and we will proceed to the
tally and interpretation of the data and results.
We will repeat this calculation for each cell in the table to obtain the expected values we need for the chi-square
test.
4. Data Collection
2 Zhang (2015
3 Lee, L., J., James, J. D., Kim, Y. K. (2014),
4 American Marketing Association (AMA). (2017). Definitions of marketing. https://www.ama.org/thedefinition-of-marketing-what-is-
marketing/
5Nassè, T. B., Ouédraogo, A., & Sall, F. D. (2019). Religiosity and consumer behavior in developing countries: An exploratory study on
Muslims in the context of Burkina Faso. African Journal of Business Management, 13(4), 116-127.
Figure 3
4.1.1.1.1.1. Motivation
Motivation is a state of activated internal needs that leads to goal-directed behavior to satisfy those needs.7
4.1.1.1.1.2. Perception
Perception is the energy that makes us aware of the world around us and gives it meaning after the perceptual
process.
4.1.1.1.1.3. Learning
Learning is a change in a person's thought process caused by previous experience. Consumer learning can come
from the marketer's actions or from non-marketing-related stimuli. Almost all consumer behavior is learned anyway.8
Beliefs and attitudes
Kotler defines beliefs as "descriptive ideas that a person has about something" and attitudes as "a person's
persistent positive or unfavorable cognitive evaluations, feelings, or behavioral tendencies toward an object or idea.9
4.1.1.1.2.1.1. Culture
Culture is a complex of human society's beliefs, its roles, behaviors, values, traditions, customs, and traditions.
Culture is a very important concept in understanding consumer behavior and must be studied.10
7Lantos, GP. (2011). "Consumer Behavior in Action; Real Life Applications for Marketing Managers," M.E. Sharpe, Inc., USA.
8William D. PERREAULT and E. Jerome McCarthy, Basic Marketing, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002, p.161.
9 Lee, S. (2007). Motivation Study Based on Expectancy Theory, The Florida State University College of Information Academic Library
10 Yakup Durmaz and Others, The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Consumer Buying Behaviours Examined through An Empirical Study,
http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol._2_No._5_[Special_Issue_-_March_2011]/13.pdf, 16.01.2012.
4.1.1.1.2.1.2. Sub-culture
Every culture includes "subcultures," which are groups of people who share common values. A subculture may
include a nationality, religion, racial group, or group of people who share the same geographic location. Subcultures can
create their own substantial and distinct market segments. For example, "Youth culture" or "club culture" has completely
different values and purchasing characteristics than the much older "gray generation."11
23.12.2011.
16.01.2012.
behavior/, 16.01.2012.
40 Vol 11 Issue 12 DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i12/BM2312-004 December, 2023
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT ISSN 2321–8916 www.theijbm.com
A person's occupation influences the products and services they purchase. Marketers try to find a group of
professionals who have an above-average interest in their product or service. Companies can also specialize in
manufacturing products needed by specific professional groups.18
22 Kimmel, A.J. (2013), Psychological Foundations of Marketing. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
24Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Schweiger, E. B. (2020). The DAST framework for retail atmospherics: The impact of in-and out-of-store
retail journey touchpoints on the customer experience. Journal of Retailing, 96, 128–137; Hultén, B. (2011). Sensory marketing: The
multi-sensory brand-experience concept. European Business Review, 23, 256–273.
25 Vukadin, A., Lemoine, J. F., & Badot, O. (2019). "Store artification and retail performance." Journal of Marketing Management, 35(7-8),
634–661. Wiedmann, K. P., Labenz, F., Haase, J., & Hennigs, N. (2018). The power of experiential marketing: Exploring the causal
relationships among multi-sensory marketing, brand experience, customer perceived value, and brand strength. Journal of Brand
Management, 25, 101–118.
26Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332-351.
The five senses are sight (sight), hearing (hearing), smell (smell), taste (taste), and touch (touch)28. Sensory
marketing refers to communicating with consumers through these five senses.29
According to (Hulten, 2020)30 sensory marketing is a marketing approach that teaches companies how to integrate
the five senses into their business activities.
According to Ren et al., (2018)31 sensory marketing directly or indirectly influences the consumer experience.
According to Manzano et al., (2019) 32< sensory marketing uses the five senses to influence perception, memory,
and learning processes to manipulate consumer motivations, desires, and behaviors>.
According to Helmefalk & Berndt (2018) < more diverse the information provided through the different senses, the
more input it can provide into the purchase decision process >.33
Touch is very important when making purchasing decisions and shopping. Feel is also influenced by the shape and
structure of the package, as well as the graphical aspects.34
27Costa, M. F.‚ Patricia‚ Z. Natasha‚ R. Jessica‚ A and Maria‚ G. V.‚ (2012). Sensory marketing: consumption experience of the Brazilian in
the restaurant industry. International Journal of Business Strategy‚ 12(4), 165-171.
28Shabgou, M., & Daryani, S. M. (2014). Towards The Sensory Marketing: Stimulating The Five Senses (Sight, Hearing, Smell, Touch And
Taste) And Its Impact On Consumer Behavior. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 573-581.
29 Erenkol, A. D. (2015). Sensory Marketing. Journal of Administrative Sciences and Policy Studies, 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.15640/jasps.v3n1a1.
31Ren, L., Qiu, H., Ma, C., & Lin, P. (2018). Investigating Accommodation Experience in Budget Hotels. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(7), 2662–2679. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2016-0625.
32 Manzano, R., Serra, T., & Gavilán, D. (2019). Sensory Marketing: Straight to the Emotions.
33 Helmefalk, M., & Berndt, A. (2018). Shedding light on the use of single and multi-sensory cues and their effect on consumer
35 Jayakrishnan S.‚ (2013). Creating brand identity using human senses. Asia Pacific Journal of Research‚ 2(8), 223-228 -
http://ssrn.com/abstract=2346045.
36 Farias S. A.‚ Aguiar E. C. and Melo‚ F. V. S.‚ (2014). Store atmospherics and experiential marketing: A conceptual framework and
research propositions for an extraordinary customer experience. International Business Research‚ 7(2) ‚ 87-99.
37 Grębosz, M., and Wrońska, B. (2012). Sensory Impact on Customer Behaviour. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 2(3), 67-77.
38Maymand, M., Ahmadinejad, M., and Nezami, P. (2012). Sensory brand: studying the relationship between 5 senses and brand value at
the world's 100 top companies. Australian Journal of Basic Applied Sciences, 6(8), 337-343
39 Rodrigues C.‚ Hultén B. and Brito C.‚ (2011). Sensorial brand strategies for value Co-creation. Innovative Marketing‚ 7(2)‚ 40-47.
40 MUSIAŁ, S.: Wszystko naraz. In Marketing w Praktyce, 2010, Vol. 10, p. 26.
41 B.J. Babin et al. Color and shopping intentions: The intervening effect of price fairness and perceived affect
42 Sendra-Nadal, E., & Carbonell-Barrachina, Á. A. (Eds.). (2017). Sensory and aroma marketing. Wageningen Academic Publishers.
45Bamakan, S., Nurgaliev, I., & Qu, Q. (2019). Opinion leader detection: A methodological review. Expert Systems With Applications, 115,
200-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.069
46 SARGI, L; MATTOS, A. O marketing de experiência e a sua importância no cenário mercadológico atual. In: CONGRESSO DE CIÊNCIAS
DA COMUNICAÇÃO NA REGIÃO CENTRO-OESTE, 17, 2015, Campo Grande, MS. Anais... Campo Grande: Intercom, 2015. p. 1-10.
47 FRANCO, N. et al. A Importância do Marketing de Experiência no Fluxo Logístico de um Parque Temático. Estudo de Caso: Walt Disney.
South American Development Journal Society, v. 5, n. 2., p. 149- 161, July 2017.
48 SMITH, K; HANOVER, D. Experiential Marketing: Secrets, Strategies, and Success Stories from the World’s Greatest Brands. New
In the production of products, packaging has the main function of preventing damage that may occur during
transportation, storage, sale, and use.50. Food packaging is made from new or recycled materials and must ensure food
safety and limit the transfer of contaminants into food.51
Packaging is critical to maintaining safety, quality, and nutritional integrity throughout a food's life cycle and
provides a barrier against biological, chemical, and physical problems.52
Packaging helps reduce product waste and extend shelf life. The function of packaging moves from protection to
information and persuasion.53 Packaging also serves as a product promotion tool.54 Packaging is also important for
marketing and product information because when shopping, customers always make purchasing decisions based on
product characteristics and appearance.55.
Packaging helps manufacturers build their brand image56. Packaging helps create an image in the consumer's mind
that can promote loyalty and trust and increase awareness through brand image.57
4.1.3.3. Color
Colors are related to people's emotions and thoughts. Color helps us remember time, space, and objects. Color can
be used to communicate, persuade, reflect emotions, or increase interest in a product. Color is one of the most important
elements of packaging design. Packaging and product color play an essential role in product rememberability. Consumers
tend to focus on packaging and product color over all other visual features. The color of packaging has a psychological
impact on consumers and influences their purchasing intentions (Klimchuk & Krasovets, 2013).
50(Wells, L. E., Farley, H., & Armstrong, G. A., ―The importance of packaging design for own-label food brands, ‖ International Journal of
Retail & Distribution Management, 35 (9), pp. 677-690, 2007.)
51 US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: Use of Recycled Plastics in Food Packaging (Chemistry Considerations).
52 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States. Available online:
53 (Anonymous, ―Product packaging: Empty Promises? ‖ Consumer Policy Review, Nov/Dec, pp. 206-211, 2000).
54 (Anonymous, ―Product packaging: Empty Promises? ‖ Consumer Policy Review, Nov/Dec, pp. 206-211, 2000).
55 Fenko, A.; Schifferstein, H.N.; Hekkert, P. Shifts in Sensory Dominance between Various Stages of User-Product Interactions. Appl.
Ergon. 2010, 41, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
56 (Keller, K. L., Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and managing brand equity, 2nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-
Hall, 2003.).
57 (Mowen, J. and Minor, M., Consumer Behaviour, 5th Ed, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1998.)
58 Klimchuk, M. R., & Krasovec, S. A. (2013). Packaging design: Successful product branding from concept to shelf. London: Wiley.
59 Perreault, W., Jr., Cannon, J., & McCarthy, E. J. (2013). Basic marketing. McGraw-Hill Higher Education
60 Kiygi-Calli, M., & Kilic, S. (2017). The impact of package design on consumers’ purchase intention. In The 22nd Marketing Congress,
Trabzon, Turkey
61Farooq, S., Habib, S., & Aslam, S. (2015). Influence of product packaging on consumer purchase intentions. International Journal of
Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(12), 538–547. François-Lecompte, A. (2005). La CSR: Proposition et validation d’un cadre
conceptual intégrateur (Doctoral dissertation). University Pierre-Mendès-France, Grenoble
Barchiesi et al. (2016) conducted a study showing which packaging colors best convey her CSR to consumers. They
found that green packaging is not the best solution to convey CSR messages to consumers, even though the color green is
mainly associated with CSR concepts.
4.1.3.5. Imagery
Combining images and printed words expands the meaning of the overall packaging design (Klimchuk & Krasovec,
2013).
The presence of images on packaging conveys information to consumers and can, therefore, directly influence
their opinions about the product. Images are used in packaging (Klimchuk & Krasovec, 2013):
• To view products,
• To represent the target market;
• To create an atmosphere,
• To increase reliability,
• To emphasize appetite
4.1.3.6. Typography
Typography is the use of letters to communicate visually and is part of a culture's visual language. It is one of the
graphic design elements of product packaging and influences consumer perception (Ampuero & Vila, 2006).62
Typography also influences communication through product packaging. The characteristics of typography are: readability,
size, shape, style, reading time.
Changes in consumer behavior, which is becoming increasingly sensitive to social and environmental issues, are
also one of the reasons why companies practice CSR. Therefore, marketers and manufacturers must play a socially
responsible role in the market and take into account (Klimchuk & Krasovec, 2013):
• The use of recycled materials, secondary packaging or excess;
• Reducing the size of packaging;
• Implications for production packaging and transport of concentrated products to reduce environmental impact;
• Impact of transport and transport on the environment in terms of gas emissions and energy efficiency;
• Short-term and long-term environmental impact;
• Cost-benefit analysis for friendly packaging.
62 Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(2), 100–112.
Figure 4
Worldwide Consumption of Packaging Materials by Type
Source: http://www.watradehub.com/
65 (Vidales, H., Giovannetti, O., (2005), "The best new cities for business", Fortune, July 25, pp. 153-158.).
66(Gonzalez M. P., Thorhsbury S., & Twede D. (2007). Packaging as a tool for product development: Communicating value to consumers.
Journal of Food Distribution Research 38
67 Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging. British Food Journal, 107 (9).
68 (Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time
pressure. British Food Journal, 106
69 (Griffin, R. C., S. Sacharow, and A. L. Brody (2005). Principles of PackageDevelopment,2nd ed. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.)
70 (Kotler Philip (2000) Marketing Management: Millennium Edition, July, Madden, T. J., Hewett, Kotler, Philip (2000). Marketing
71 (Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of involvement level and time
72 (B. Carsrud. “The verbal and visual components of Package Design”. Journal of Product and Brand Management, vol.9, pp.56-70, 2009.)
73 (B. Rundh. “The Multi-faceted Dimension of Packaging”. British Food Journal, vol.107, pp.670-684, 2005.)
74 https://kemtek.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Mintel-2020-Global-Packaging-Trends.pdf
75 Liza Becker
Search author for Liza Becker Thomas J.L. van Rompay, Hendrik N.J. Schifferstein, Mirjam Galetzka
Food quality and preference 2011 v.22 no.1 pp. 17-23
76 Becker L., van Rompay T. J. L., Schifferstein H. N. J., Galetzka M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design
on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1), 17–23.
77 Mr. Mitul M. Deliya, & Mr. Bhavesh J. Parmar,. (2012). Role of Packaging on Consumer Buying Behavior Patan District. Global Journal
80 (Elkhattat, D., Medhat, M.,(2020). Using Technology in Smart and Intelligent Food Packages as a Communicational Tool with
Consumers, 2021 World Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT),
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9443994, DOI: 10.1109/WCCCT52091.2021.00027)
81 (Cammarelle, A., Lombardi, M., Viscecchia, R., (2021), Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste: Are Italian
Manufacturers Willing to Invest?, MDPI Sustainability 2021, 13, 1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041963
https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability )
82 (Vyas, H., Bhuvanesh v. (2015). Packaging design elements and users' perception: a context in fashion branding and communication.
Journal of Applied Packaging Research, https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http
s://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1 034&context=japr )
Business Dictionary (2018)84 defines CSR as "a company's sense of responsibility towards the communities and
environment (environmental and social) in which it operates." Companies express this citizenship through processes that
reduce waste and pollution and through which they provide educational and social programs. It is about achieving an
appropriate profit from the resources used."
For this reason, many companies use corporate social responsibility to demonstrate that they have considered the
economic, social and environmental impact of their activities to gain a competitive advantage in the market. Incorporate
the program into your business plan.
CSR covers both social and environmental issues, and its practice is primarily voluntary. Retailers offer consumers
ethical products, including brands with social and environmental elements. Laws and regulations have increased the
importance of CSR (Tekin et al., 2015)85.
The most important factors are laws and regulations that turn CSR practices into mandatory practices. Companies
have recognized the importance of the environment and have started adopting some strategies and changing their
business processes. From an environmental protection perspective, these companies consider environmental issues to be
an important part of their social responsibility. Especially when managing supply chains, it is also important to consider
whether suppliers and other companies in the chain are all implementing CSR activities and practices. All companies,
including suppliers, are responsible for not harming the environment, reducing waste and pollution, managing gas
emissions, and complying with government regulations while reducing costs and increasing profits (Tekin et al., 2015).
Tekin et al. (2015) summarize some environmental CSR practices in supply chains as follows:
• Purchase and Use Recycled Materials for Packaging Materials.
• Encourage Suppliers For Waste Reduction.
• Produce Recyclable and Reversible Materials in Manufacturing and Design.
• Compliance with Environmental Protection Standards in Life Cycle Management, Production, Packaging and
Storage Processes.
• Supporting Suppliers in Implementing Processes to Protect the Environment.
Companies want to incorporate CSR into their processes to achieve higher customer satisfaction and loyalty, better
corporate image and reputation, higher productivity, lower costs and higher profits. Companies are incorporating CSR
practices into business processes such as purchasing, warehousing, packaging, transportation, and distribution.
CSR practices in the packaging process include various activities such as storing products and protecting them from
deterioration. The process should use recycled and non-hazardous materials, reduce waste and energy consumption, and
be designed not to harm the ecosystem (James et al., 2005).86
When it comes to packaging, package size is often ignored, but it is an important factor. The size of the package
directly affects the amount of material used. Companies that offer optimally packaged products utilize their resources
more effectively. Additionally, small packages help companies reduce loading and transportation costs.
Sustainability issues in the food industry mean reducing waste through high-quality packaging and long product shelf
life.87
To reduce packaging waste, we need to adopt a circular approach that reduces, reuses and recycles packaging
materials.88 Reducing packaging materials reduces the weight and materials used in packaging production. This means
that packaging is made lighter by using plastic materials, rather than relying on cans or glass bottles.89. Reusing packaging
in a circular economy means collecting the original packaging, cleaning it and refilling it with the same product to ensure
product safety. Reusable packaging must be strong enough to withstand repeated use.90 In a circular economy, recycling is
83 Jobber, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2012). Principles and practice of marketing (No. 7th). McGraw-Hill Higher Education
85 Tekin, E. K., Ertürk, A., & Tozan, H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains
86 James, K., Fitzpatrick, L., Lewis, H., & Sonneveld, K. (2005). Sustainable packaging system development. In L. Filho (Ed.), Handbook of
87Guillard, V.; Gaucel, S.; Fornaciari, C.; Angellier-Coussy, H.; Buche, P.; Gontard, N. The Next Generation of Sustainable Food Packaging to
Preserve Our Environment in a Circular Economy Context. Front. Nutr. 2018, 5, 121.
88 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: A Mantra for Food Packaging. Available
89 Berg, P.; Feber, D.; Granskog, A.; Nordigården, D.; Ponkshe, S. The Drive toward Sustainability in Packaging—Beyond the Quick Wins.
90 Sand, C.K. Orchestrating More Sustainable Reusable Food Packaging. Available online: https://www.ift.org/news-and-
publications/food-technology-magazine/issues/2020/december/columns/packaging-orchestrating-more-sustainable-reusable-food-
packaging (accessed on August 12 2022).
important to reduce waste, but cleanliness is also very important. Therefore, recycling must be done through mechanical
and chemical processes.91.
4.2.1.1. Hypothesis
1- Hypothesis 1 for the relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging color:
• H0: There is no relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging color.
• H1: There is a relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging color.
2- Hypothesis 2 for the relationship between Buying Behavior and Packaging material:
• H0: There is a relationship between Buying Behavior and Packaging material.
• H1: There is a relationship between Buying Behavior and Packaging material.
3- Hypothesis 3 for the relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging form:
• H0: There is no relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging form.
• H1: There is a relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative Packaging form.
4- Hypothesis 4 for the relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative packaging graphics:
• H0: There is no relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative packaging graphics.
• H1: There is a relationship between Buying Behavior and innovative packaging graphics.
5. Data Analysis
Out of 400 questionnaires distributed, 325 were received back and authentic for research study.
Figure 5
• Interpretation: As seen in this pie diagram, 56% of our respondents are female, while 44% are male. This
percentage is representative of the overall Cameroon population where we have more women than men.
91Franz, R.; Welle, F. Recycling post-consumer packaging materials into new food packaging applications—Critical review of the
European approach and future perspectives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 824.
49 Vol 11 Issue 12 DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i12/BM2312-004 December, 2023
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT ISSN 2321–8916 www.theijbm.com
Figure 6
• Interpretation: As seen in this diagram, according to respondents, packaging materials and innovative packaging
labeling are the most attractive packaging elements when it comes to buying chocolate products. Innovative
packaging color is also essential when considering innovative shapes.
Definitely Probably
Gender Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Not Not
Male 35 24% 12 8% 40 28% 26 18% 30 21% 143
female 17 9% 20 11% 50 27% 38 21% 57 31% 182
total 52 16% 32 10% 90 28% 64 20% 87 27% 325
Table 5
Figure 7
• Interpretation: According to this bar chart, women are more likely to buy cases of innovative packaging color.
Figure 8
• Interpretation: According to this bar chart, women are more likely to buy in cases of innovative packaging shapes,
and more men will not definitely buy in cases of innovative shapes.
Male 23 36 42 22 20 143
female 14 26 50 45 47 182
total 37 62 92 67 67 325
Table 7
Figure 9
• Interpretation: According to this column chart, packaging materials has a significant impact on men's and
women's buying behavior (42 men -50 women) and women are more likely to choose product with a good
packaging materials ( 47 women-20 men)
Male 20 12 28 45 38 143
female 6 14 32 69 61 182
total 26 26 60 114 99 325
Table 8
Figure 10
• Interpretation: As seen on this column chart, females are more likely to buy in case of innovative packaging
labeling, but this aspect of packaging is essential for men, too and can impact their buying behavior.
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Male 35 24% 12 8% 40 28% 26 18% 30 21% 143
female 17 9% 20 11% 50 27% 38 21% 57 31% 182
total 52 16% 32 10% 90 28% 64 20% 87 27% 325
Chi-square 15,51
Degree of freedom (5-1)*(2-1) 4
Table 10
The Critical Value of X2 0.05 = 9.488 from the chi-square table at 4 degrees of freedom.
Decision: Since the calculated X 2 value of 15.51 is greater than the critical value, which is 9.488, we reject the null
hypothesis Ho and accept the alternate hypothesis H1, which states that packaging color influences buying behavior.
The Critical Value of X2 0.05 = 9.488 from the chi-square table at 4 degrees of freedom.
Decision: Since the calculated X 2 value of 6.47 is less than the critical value, which is 9.488, we valid the null
hypothesis Ho, which states that innovative packaging shapes do not influence buying behavior, and we reject the
alternate hypothesis H1.
The Critical Value of X2 0.05 = 9.488 from the chi-square table at 4 degrees of freedom.
Decision: Since the calculated X 2 value of 18.87 is greater than the critical value of 9.488, we reject the null
hypothesis Ho and validate the alternate hypothesis H1, which states that packaging materials influence buying behavior.
Male 20 12 28 45 38 143
female 5 15 32 69 61 182
total 25 27 60 114 99 325
Chi-square 15,54
Degree of freedom 4
Table 13
The Critical Value of X2 0.05 = 9.488 from the chi-square table at 4 degrees of freedom
53 Vol 11 Issue 12 DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i12/BM2312-004 December, 2023
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT ISSN 2321–8916 www.theijbm.com
Decision: Since the calculated X 2 value of 15,54 is greater than the critical value of 9.488, we reject the null
hypothesis Ho and validate the alternate hypothesis H1, which states that innovative packaging labeling influences buying
behavior.
6. Managerial Recommendations
Based on our findings, we recommend the following:
• Chocojoy should always choose eco-friendly packaging, not only to promote the product but also to protect the
environment in the long run.
• Chocojoy should not ignore the packaging element and consider packaging as one of the most important tools for
your organization and products to succeed in the market.
• In order to improve the competitiveness of their products in the market, they should regularly assess how
consumers react to their products' packaging, ensure that their packaging is attractive to consumers, and improve
their product Sales.
• Chocojoy must ensure that the packaging reflects the quality of the product and always puts packaging into
product decisions to create a good image of the product in the minds of consumers.
• Marketers and companies can create appropriate and sufficiently detailed marketing strategies that appeal to the
women in this study in terms of innovative packaging elements and purchasing behavior. By understanding female
consumer trends, marketers can adjust their market segmentation and strategy accordingly and avoid blindly
promoting their products.
• Marketers should focus on female consumers. Female consumers have a positive attitude towards innovative
packaging elements. Marketers should accurately package their products to promote positive outcomes for female
consumers.
• Marketers and companies can hire relevant influencers or brand ambassadors who align with their products and
values and continuously gather feedback from predominantly female customers through surveys, reviews and
media interactions.
• Marketers can ensure that packaging images and messages reflect diverse and inclusive women.
• Companies can create packages that resonate with their female audience. This may include using colors, images
and fonts that match their preferences and values, taking into account factors such as aesthetics, practicality and
environmental impact.
This research is only limited to Cameroon and in the field of packaging in the food industry; the result of this
research could not be applied either in other countries or in other research fields.
This research exclusively focuses on adult and their preference regarding innovative packaging. Therefore, the
finding is not applicable to other demographic groups, such as children, teenagers and senior citizens, who may have
different responses to innovative packaging.
7. Conclusion
Packaging is one of the most important means of communication, a dynamic force in our society and the
workhorse of branded products. Packaging not only protects your product but also increases product sales.
Packaging influences consumer purchasing behavior, so good packaging makes it easier for customers to handle
the product, and the information printed on product packaging helps customers understand the product in detail, like
ingredients used, manufacturing and expiration dates, product price, etc. This printed information helps customers make
purchasing decisions.
Packaging also makes it clear to identify the right product among the variety available on the market and
promotes brand loyalty. In fact, people are increasingly demanding product quality and packaging protection.
The proposed research model of Chocojoy's packaging elements that ultimately influence consumer choice was empirically
tested. The study found that innovation in packaging elements such as color, labeling, and materials are most important to
consumers purchasing decisions. The study concluded that women are more likely to purchase Chocojoy products with
innovative packaging colors, labels, and materials. These factors are also important for men when making purchasing
decisions. However, of all the factors, the packaging shape has the least impact on the purchasing behavior of women and
men, and is considered to be a minor purchasing factor.
Decisions regarding innovative packaging elements were evaluated, and overall, it was concluded that this study
shows that packaging materials, labels and colors are associated with the purchasing behavior of Chocojoy consumers in
Cameroon.
8. References
i. Vartanian, T. P. (2010). Secondary data analysis. Oxford University Press.
ii. Zhang, J. H. (2015). Research on Customer Purchase Intention Based on WeChat Marketing (Doctoral dissertation,
Shanghai University of Engineering and Technology).
iii. Lee, L. J., James, J. D., & Kim, Y. K. (2014). A Reconceptualization of Brand Image. International Journal of Business
Administration, 5(4), 1–11.
iv. American Marketing Association (AMA). (2017). Definitions of marketing. https://www.ama.org/thedefinition-
of-marketing-what-is-marketing/
v. Nassè, T. B., Ouédraogo, A., & Sall, F. D. (2019). Religiosity and consumer behavior in developing countries: An
exploratory study on Muslims in the context of Burkina Faso. African Journal of Business Management, 13(4),
116–127.
vi. Training. (2004, January 20).
http://www.ul.ie/techcomm/ELearning/Projects/ELearning%20Projects/ElaineWalsh/CARS/module1_titles.h
tm
vii. Lantos, G. P. (2011). Consumer Behavior in Action: Real Life Applications for Marketing Managers. M.E. Sharpe,
Inc., USA.
viii. Perreault, W. D., & McCarthy, E. J. (2002). Basic Marketing. McGraw-Hill, New York.
ix. Lee, S. (2007). Motivation Study Based on Expectancy Theory. The Florida State University College of Information
Academic Library Service, the Florida State University.
x. Durmaz, Y., & Others. (2011). The Impact of Cultural Factors on Consumer Buying Behaviors Examined through
An Empirical Study. http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol.2_No.5[Special_Issue-_March_2011]/13.pdf
xi. Factors Affecting Consumer Buying Behavior. (2011, December 23). http://www.marketing91.com/factors-
affecting-consumer-buying-behavior/
xii. SHAH, A. (2012). Factors Affecting Consumer Behavior. http://ezinearticles.com/?Factors-Affecting-Consumer-
Behavior&id=4602848
xiii. Factors influencing consumer behavior. (2008, May). http://www.mbanotesworld.in/2008/05/factors-
influencing-consumer-behavior.html
xiv. SHAH, A. (2012). Factors Affecting Consumer Behavior. http://ezinearticles.com/?Factors-Affecting-Consumer-
Behavior&id=4602848
xv. DURMAZ, Y., & ZENGİN, S. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Effect of Family Factors on Consumer Buying
Behaviors. http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/12453
xvi. Consumer Buyer Behavior. (2012, January 16). http://www.zainbooks.com/books/marketing/principles-of-
marketing_15_consumer-buying-behavior.html
xvii. Consumer Markets: Influences on Consumer Behavior. (2012, January 16). http://referaty-
seminarky.sk/consumer-markets-influences-on-consumer-behavior/
xviii. Consumer Markets: Influences on Consumer Behavior. (2012, January 16). http://referaty-
seminarky.sk/consumer-markets-influences-on-consumer-behavior/
xix. Consumer Markets: Influences on Consumer Behavior. (2012, January 16). http://referaty-
seminarky.sk/consumer-markets-influences-on-consumer-behavior/
xx. Fyrbjörk, J. (2003). Attitudes and Consumer Behavior. http://hem.passagen.se/fyrbjork/Bachelor_Thesis.pdf
xxi. YİP, J. (2003). Final Revision Notes for Consumer Behavior Module.
http://www.icbwin.com/upload/Final%20Revision%20Notes%20for%20Consumer%20Behavior-
PART%20B.doc
xxii. Kimmel, A. J. (2013). Psychological Foundations of Marketing. Routledge: Taylor & Francis Group.
xxiii. Krishna, A. (2011). Sensory marketing: Research on the sensuality of products. Routledge.
xxiv. Roggeveen, A. L., Grewal, D., & Schweiger, E. B. (2020). The DAST framework for retail atmospherics: The impact
of in-and out-of-store retail journey touchpoints on the customer experience. Journal of Retailing, 96, 128–137.
xxv. Vukadin, A., Lemoine, J. F., & Badot, O. (2019). Store artification and retail performance. Journal of Marketing
Management, 35(7-8), 634–661. Wiedmann, K. P., Labenz, F., Haase, J., & Hennigs, N. (2018). The power of
experiential marketing: Exploring the causal relationships among multi-sensory marketing, brand experience,
customer perceived value, and brand strength. Journal of Brand Management, 25, 101–118.
xxvi. Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception,
judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351.
xxvii. Costa, M. F., Patricia, Z., Natasha, R., Jessica, A., and Maria, G. V. (2012). Sensory marketing: consumption
experience of the Brazilian in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Business Strategy, 12(4), 165–171.
xxviii. Shabgou, M., & Daryani, S. M. (2014). Towards The Sensory Marketing: Stimulating the Five Senses (Sight,
Hearing, Smell, Touch and Taste) and Its Impact on Consumer Behavior. Indian Journal of Fundamental and
Applied Life Sciences, 573–581.
xxix. Erenkol, A. D. (2015). Sensory Marketing. Journal of Administrative Sciences and Policy Studies, 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.15640/jasps.v3n1a1
xxx. Hulten, B. (2020). Sensory Marketing: An Introduction (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
xxxi. Ren, L., Qiu, H., Ma, C., & Lin, P. (2018). Investigating Accommodation Experience in Budget Hotels. International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(7), 2662–2679. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2016-
0625
xxxii. Manzano, R., Serra, T., & Gavilán, D. (2019). Sensory Marketing: Straight to the Emotions.
xxxiii. Helmefalk, M., & Berndt, A. (2018). Shedding light on the use of single and multi-sensory cues and their effect on
consumer behaviors. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46(11–12), 1077–1091.
xxxiv. Mokrý, S., Birčiaková, N., Slováčková, T., Stávková, J., Nagyová, Ľ. (2016). Perception of wine labels by Generation
Z: Eye-tracking experiment. Potravinarstvo, 10(1), 524–531. https://dx.doi.org/10.5219/647
xxxv. Jayakrishnan S. (2013). Creating brand identity using human senses. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 2(8), 223–
228. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2346045
xxxvi. Farias S. A., Aguiar E. C., and Melo, F. V. S. (2014). Store atmospherics and experiential marketing: A conceptual
framework and research propositions for an extraordinary customer experience. International Business
Research, 7(2), 87–99.
xxxvii. Grębosz, M., and Wrońska, B. (2012). Sensory Impact on Customer Behavior. Konsumpcja i Rozwój, 2(3), 67–77.
xxxviii. Maymand, M., Ahmadinejad, M., and Nezami, P. (2012). Sensory brand: studying the relationship between 5
senses and brand value at the world’s 100 top companies. Australian Journal of Basic Applied Sciences, 6(8), 337–
343.
xxxix. Rodrigues C., Hultén B., and Brito C. (2011). Sensorial brand strategies for value Co-creation. Innovative
Marketing, 7(2), 40–47.
xl. MUSIAŁ, S. (2010). Wszystko naraz. In Marketing w Praktyce, 10, 26.
xli. Babin, B. J., et al. (2003). Color and shopping intentions: the intervening effect of price fairness and perceived
affect.
xlii. Sendra-Nadal, E., & Carbonell-Barrachina, Á. A. (Eds.). (2017). Sensory and aroma marketing. Wageningen
Academic Publishers.
xliii. Hultén, B. (2015). Sensory Marketing.
xliv. Mcleod, S. (2021). Social Influence. Retrieved May 17 from: https://www.simplypsychology.org/a-level-
social.htm
xlv. Bamakan, S., Nurgaliev, I., & Qu, Q. (2019). Opinion leader detection: A methodological review. Expert Systems
with Applications, 115, 200–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.07.069
xlvi. SARGI, L., & MATTOS, A. (2015). O marketing de experiência e a sua importância no cenário mercadológico
atual. In: CONGRESSO DE CIÊNCIAS DA COMUNICAÇÃO NA REGIÃO CENTRO-OESTE, 17., 2015, Campo Grande,
MS. Anais..., 1–10.
xlvii. FRANCO, N. et al. (2017). An Importância do Marketing de Experiência no Fluxo Logístico de um Parque
Temático. Estudo de Caso: Walt Disney. South American Development Journal Society, 5(2), 149–161.
xlviii. SMITH, K., & HANOVER, D. (2016). Experiential Marketing: Secrets, Strategies, and Success Stories from the
World’s Greatest Brands. New Jersey: Wiley.
xlix. Gonzalez, M. P., Thorhsbury S., and Twede D. (2007). Packaging as a tool for product development:
Communicating value to consumers. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 38(1), 61–66.
l. Wells, L. E., Farley, H., & Armstrong, G. A. (2007). The importance of packaging design for own-label food brands.
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(9), 677–690.
li. US Food and Drug Administration. (n.d.). Guidance for Industry: Use of Recycled Plastics in Food Packaging
(Chemistry Considerations). https://www.fda.gov/media/150792/download
lii. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Estimates of Foodborne Illness in the United States.
[https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html](https://www
liii. (Anonymous, ― Product packaging: Empty Promises? ‖ Consumer Policy Review, Nov/Dec, pp. 206-211, 2000).
liv. (Anonymous, ― Product packaging: Empty Promises? ‖ Consumer Policy Review, Nov/Dec, pp. 206-211, 2000).
lv. Fenko, A., Schifferstein, H. N., & Hekkert, P. (2010). Shifts in Sensory Dominance between Various Stages of User-
Product Interactions. Applied Ergonomics, 41(1), 34–40.
lvi. Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring and managing brand equity (2nd ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
lvii. Mowen, J., & Minor, M. (1998). Consumer Behavior (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
lviii. Klimchuk, M. R., & Krasovec, S. A. (2013). Packaging design: Successful product branding from concept to shelf.
London: Wiley.
lix. Perreault, W., Jr., Cannon, J., & McCarthy, E. J. (2013). Basic marketing. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
lx. Kiygi-Calli, M., & Kilic, S. (2017). The impact of package design on consumers’ purchase intention. In the 22nd
Marketing Congress, Trabzon, Turkey.
lxi. Farooq, S., Habib, S., & Aslam, S. (2015). Influence of product packaging on consumer purchase intentions.
International Journal of Economics, Commerce, and Management.
lxii. Ampuero, O., & Vila, N. (2006). Consumer perceptions of product packaging. Journal of Consumer Marketing,
23(2), 100–112.
lxiii. European Plastics in Contact with Food Regulations. (n.d.). Retrieved from:
http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/chemicalsafety/foodcontact/legislisten.htm#02–72.
lxiv. British Plastics Federation. (n.d.). Retrieved from: www.bpf.co.uk.
lxv. Vidales, H., & Giovannetti, O. (2005). The best new cities for business. Fortune, July 25, 153–158.
lxvi. Gonzalez, M. P., Thorhsbury, S., & Twede, D. (2007). Packaging as a tool for product development:
Communicating value to consumers. Journal of Food Distribution Research, 38.
lxvii. Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging. British Food Journal, 107(9).
lxviii. Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of
involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal, 106.
lxix. Griffin, R. C., Sacharow, S., & Brody, A. L. (2005). Principles of Package Development (2nd ed.). Van Nostrand
Reinhold, New York.
lxx. Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management: Millennium Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
lxxi. Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: An exploratory study on the impact of
involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal, 106(8).
56 Vol 11 Issue 12 DOI No.: 10.24940/theijbm/2023/v11/i12/BM2312-004 December, 2023
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT ISSN 2321–8916 www.theijbm.com
lxxii. Carsrud, B. (2009). The verbal and visual components of Package Design. Journal of Product and Brand
Management, 9, 56–70.
lxxiii. Rundh, B. (2005). The Multi-faceted Dimension of Packaging. British Food Journal, 107, 670–684.
lxxiv. Mintel. (2022). 2020 Global Packaging Trends. Retrieved from: https://kemtek.co.za/wp-
content/uploads/2022/04/Mintel-2020-Global-Packaging-Trends.pdf.
lxxv. Becker, L., van Rompay, T. J. L., Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Galetzka, M. (2011). Tough package, strong taste: The
influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations. Food Quality and Preference, 22(1),
17–23.
lxxvi. Deliya, M. M., & Parmar, B. J. (2012). Role of Packaging on Consumer Buying Behavior Patan District. Global
Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(10), 49–67.
lxxvii. Drago, E., Campardelli, R., Pettinato, M., & Perego, P. (2020). Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food:
An Extensive Review. Foods, 9, 1628. doi:10.3390/foods9111628.
lxxviii. Louw, A., & Kimber, M. (2007). The Power of Packaging: The Customer Equity Company is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of TNS (UK).
lxxix. Elkhattat, D., & Medhat, M. (2020). Using Technology in Smart and Intelligent Food Packages as a
Communicational Tool with Consumers. 2021 World Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies
(WCCCT). doi:10.1109/WCCCT52091.2021.00027.
lxxx. Cammarelle, A., Lombardi, M., & Viscecchia, R. (2021). Packaging Innovations to Reduce Food Loss and Waste:
Are Italian Manufacturers Willing to Invest? Sustainability, 13, 1963. doi:10.3390/su13041963.
lxxxi. Vyas, H., & Bhuvanesh, V. (2015). Packaging design elements and users’ perception: a context in fashion
branding and communication. Journal of Applied Packaging Research. Retrieved from:
https://scholarworks.rit.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=10
34&context=japr.
lxxxii. Jobber, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2012). Principles and practice of marketing (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher
Education.
lxxxiii. Business Dictionary. (2018). Corporate social responsibility. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/corporate-social-responsibility.html.
lxxxiv. Tekin, E. K., Ertürk, A., & Tozan, H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in supply chains.
lxxxv. James, K., Fitzpatrick, L., Lewis, H., & Sonneveld, K. (2005). Sustainable packaging system development. In L.
Filho (Ed.), Handbook of sustainability research. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang Scientific Publishing.
lxxxvi. Guillard, V., Gaucel, S., Fornaciari, C., Angellier-Coussy, H., Buche, P., & Gontard, N. (2018). The Next Generation
of Sustainable Food Packaging to Preserve Our Environment in a Circular Economy Context. Frontiers in
Nutrition, 5, 121.
lxxxvii. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (n.d.). Reduce, Reuse, And Recycle: A Mantra for Food
Packaging. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/fao-stories/article/en/c/1441299/.
lxxxviii. Berg, P., Feber, D., Granskog, A., Nordigården, D., & Ponkshe, S. (n.d.). The Drive toward Sustainability in
Packaging—Beyond the Quick Wins. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/paper-forest-
products-and-packaging/our-insights/the-drive-toward-sustainability-in-packaging-beyond-the-quick-wins.
lxxxix. Sand, C. K. (2022). Orchestrating More Sustainable Reusable Food Packaging. Retrieved from:
https://www.ift.org/news-and-publications/food-technology-
magazine/issues/2020/december/columns/packaging-orchestrating-more-sustainable-reusable-food-
packaging.
xc. Franz, R., & Welle, F. (2022). Recycling of post-consumer packaging materials into new food packaging
applications—Critical review of the European approach and future perspectives. Sustainability, 14, 824.
Appendix
Questionnaire
Gender of Respondents
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Male 35 24% 12 8% 40 28% 26 18% 30 21% 143
female 17 9% 20 11% 50 27% 38 21% 57 31% 182
total 52 16% 32 10% 90 28% 64 20% 87 27% 325
Q3- The color of a product's packaging affects my perception of the product's quality.
Q4- I am more likely to notice and remember products with colorful packaging.
Q5- Changing color of the packages is something essential and motivates you to buy.
Gender Definitely Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Not
Male 18 25 24 30 46 143
female 5 31 43 43 60 182
total 23 56 67 73 106 325
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Male 10 (53%) 21 (62%) 28(44%) 49(42%) 35(38%) 143 (44%)
female 9(47%) 13 (38%) 35(56%) 68(58%) 57(62%) 182(56%)
total 19(100%) 34 (100%) 63 (100%) 117(100%) 92 (100%) 325 (100%)
Q7- Offering a product in a new shape attracts your attention towards it.
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Male 10 (53%) 21 (62%) 28(44%) 49(42%) 35(38%) 143 (44%)
female 9(47%) 13 (38%) 35(56%) 68(58%) 57(62%) 182(56%)
total 19(100%) 34 (100%) 63 (100%) 117(100%) 92 (100%) 325 (100%)
Q8- Distinguish the shape of the packaging more than competing goods attracts your attention towards them.
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Male 25 21 32 26 39 143
female 13 18 38 41 72 182
total 38 39 70 67 111 325
Gender Definitely Not Probably Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Not
Male 23 36 42 22 20 143
female 14 26 50 45 47 182
total 37 62 92 67 67 325
Q10- Quality of Packaging Material Attracts Your Attention towards the Product.
Gender Definitely Not Probably Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Not
Male 6 10 30 45 52 143
female 2 7 43 51 79 182
total 8 17 73 96 131 325
Frequency
definitely not 19
Probably not 21
Possibly 107
Probably yes 85
Definitely yes 93
total 325
Q14- I will pay more for a product with innovative packaging labeling.
Gender Definitely Not Probably Not Possibly Probably Yes Definitely Yes Total
Female 17 25 38 32 70 182
Total 27 49 75 66 108 325
Q16- Packaging labeling provides enough information to identify the components of the product.
Q17- The Aesthetic aspects of labeling attract your attention to the product.
Female 5 17 33 52 75 182
Total 24 45 64 79 113 325
Frequency
definitely not 63
Probably not 60
Possibly 97
Probably yes 64
Definitely yes 41
total 325
Q19- Have you ever decided not to buy a product because you did not like the label?
Modalities Frequency
yes 108
no 217
Frequency
color 49
Labeling 96
shape 30
Material use 150
total 325