CAF 08 Test 7 - Suggested Solution
CAF 08 Test 7 - Suggested Solution
Q.1
Q.2
(a)
Business risk is the risk that an event or condition may adversely affect the ability of the entity to achieve
its objectives (02 marks).
(b)
Auditor can use Interim financial statements (0.5 mark), Management accounts (0.5 mark), Budgets (0.5 mark),
Forecasts (0.5 mark).
Audit and Assurance | Page 2 of 3
Q. 3
REVENUE
Justification Procedures to address risk
1. There is an unusual increase of 7.8% (51,260 / 47,560) in Discuss reasons for the increase in revenue with management.
revenue as compared to less than 2% in previous years. Vouch entries in the revenue account to invoices and confirmation
Therefore, there is a risk of Occurrence assertions of of successful installation.
sales. Perform cut-off tests
2. 40% of revenue is received in advance prior to Evaluate and test the system for recording deferred income and its
commencement of work. There is a risk that revenue may transfer to revenue.
be recognized pre-mature. Therefore, there is a risk of For a sample of contracts in progress at year-end trace initial
Occurrence assertions of sales. payment invoice to entry in deferred income account
WORK IN PROGRESS
Justification Procedures to address risk
1. Work in process involves estimation of stage of completion Enquire if there were any systems issues during the year and
(which is subjective); and absorption of overhead (which is if previous years issues have been remedied.
complex). Therefore, Valuation and Allocation assertion of For a sample of material costs, reperform exchange rate
Inventory is at risk. translation and check the rate to a reliable source.
2. Inventory turnover ratio has increased to 87.8 days (7,500 / Obtain workings for overhead allocation and ensure only
30,760 * 360) this year from 74.5 days (6,305 / 30,440 * 360) attributable overheads are included
in last year, which indicate overstatement of work in process. Assess consistency of valuation of work in process with
3. Number of weaknesses in job costing system were identified in previous years.
previous year which may result in erroneous valuation in Compare actual costs to budget to identify cost overruns
current year too. which may indicate potential losses
4. Suppliers invoice in euro and there may be errors in Compare contract price to estimated total costs for contracts
translation. in progress at the year end to ascertain whether provision for
5. There may be loss on some contracts in progress due to cost- losses is required.
overrun. Inspect ageing of WIP to identify any unbilled/irrecoverable
WIP.
TRADE RECEIVABLES
Justification Procedures to address risk
Obtain aged receivable analysis and review for evidence of
overdue balances
1. Debtors turnover ratio has increased to 46.5 days (6,620 / Inspect customer correspondence and board minutes for
51,260 * 360) this year from 26.1 days (3,450 / 47,560 * 360) evidence of disputes
in last year, which indicates that debtors may be overstated Examine bank statement to see if receivables are paid after
e.g. fake debtors may exist or poor debtors may exist from year end
whom full recovery is not expected. Therefore, Existence and Review credit notes issued after year end
Valuation and Allocation assertions of Debtors are at risk. Direct confirmation of balances with customers
Inspect contract with Durcoal
2. A material amount of receivable (1,835,000) is in doubt Consider basis and adequacy for provisions for Durcoal and
because of dispute. This amount may not be recovered in full. other balances.
FREEHOLD PREMISES
Justification Procedures to address risk
1. Revaluation may be incorrectly Ensure Competence, Capabilities and Objectivity of the Valuer:
calculated and recorded because it Auditor shall obtain knowledge of expert’s independence, qualification, experience,
involves Subjectivity and Complexity expertise, and reputation.
(e.g. deferred tax implication). Ensure adequacy of valuation report:
Therefore, Valuation and Allocation Auditor shall determine adequacy of work by evaluating:
assertion of fixed assets is at risk. 1. Relevance, completeness, and accuracy of significant source data
2. Relevance and reasonableness of significant assumptions and methods
2. The Newcastle site has not been 3. Reasonableness of expert’s findings and conclusions
revalued (IFRS require all properties 4. Consistency of these conclusions with other audit evidence
in the same class to be revalued). Ensure revaluation has been properly accounted for in financial statements:
1. Ensure that entire class of asset has been revalued.
2. Ensure that valuation is up-to-date.
3. Ensure that valuation is appropriately accounted for in accounts.
4. Recalculate “revaluation surplus (or loss)”, and “depreciation expenses” and
ensure these have been correctly recorded in books of accounts.
5. Ensure that appropriate disclosures have been made in accordance with IAS–16.
Audit and Assurance | Page 3 of 3
(THE END)