0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views5 pages

Omegle

1) The document is a letter from the creator of the chat website Omegle describing the origins and purpose of the site, as well as addressing criticisms of illegal behavior on the platform. 2) Omegle was created to enable random online conversations between strangers and fulfill the basic human need of meeting new people. However, some users misused the site to commit crimes, leading to attacks against Omegle. 3) While the creator acknowledges illegal behavior and has implemented moderation measures, he argues it is unreasonable to expect any site to completely prevent all criminal misuse, and that shutting down the site punishes innocent users.

Uploaded by

samslip18
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views5 pages

Omegle

1) The document is a letter from the creator of the chat website Omegle describing the origins and purpose of the site, as well as addressing criticisms of illegal behavior on the platform. 2) Omegle was created to enable random online conversations between strangers and fulfill the basic human need of meeting new people. However, some users misused the site to commit crimes, leading to attacks against Omegle. 3) While the creator acknowledges illegal behavior and has implemented moderation measures, he argues it is unreasonable to expect any site to completely prevent all criminal misuse, and that shutting down the site punishes innocent users.

Uploaded by

samslip18
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Omegle https://www.omegle.

com/

“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber
baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who
torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own
conscience.” — C.S. Lewis

“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely
regarded as a bad move.” — Douglas Adams

Dear strangers,

From the moment I discovered the Internet at a young age, it has been a magical place to me. Growing up in a small town,
relatively isolated from the larger world, it was a revelation how much more there was to discover – how many interesting
people and ideas the world had to offer.

As a young teenager, I couldn’t just waltz onto a college campus and tell a student: “Let’s debate moral philosophy!” I
couldn’t walk up to a professor and say: “Tell me something interesting about microeconomics!” But online, I was able to
meet those people, and have those conversations. I was also an avid Wikipedia editor; I contributed to open source

1 of 5 11/9/23, 4:46 AM
Omegle https://www.omegle.com/

software projects; and I often helped answer computer programming questions posed by people many years older than me.

In short, the Internet opened the door to a much larger, more diverse, and more vibrant world than I would have otherwise
been able to experience; and enabled me to be an active participant in, and contributor to, that world. All of this helped me
to learn, and to grow into a more well-rounded person.

Moreover, as a survivor of childhood rape, I was acutely aware that any time I interacted with someone in the physical
world, I was risking my physical body. The Internet gave me a refuge from that fear. I was under no illusion that only good
people used the Internet; but I knew that, if I said “no” to someone online, they couldn’t physically reach through the
screen and hold a weapon to my head, or worse. I saw the miles of copper wires and fiber-optic cables between me and
other people as a kind of shield – one that empowered me to be less isolated than my trauma and fear would have
otherwise allowed.

I launched Omegle when I was 18 years old, and still living with my parents. It was meant to build on the things I loved
about the Internet, while introducing a form of social spontaneity that I felt didn’t exist elsewhere. If the Internet is a
manifestation of the “global village”, Omegle was meant to be a way of strolling down a street in that village, striking up
conversations with the people you ran into along the way.

The premise was rather straightforward: when you used Omegle, it would randomly place you in a chat with someone else.
These chats could be as long or as short as you chose. If you didn’t want to talk to a particular person, for whatever
reason, you could simply end the chat and – if desired – move onto another chat with someone else. It was the idea of
“meeting new people” distilled down to almost its platonic ideal.

Building on what I saw as the intrinsic safety benefits of the Internet, users were anonymous to each other by default. This
made chats more self-contained, and made it less likely that a malicious person would be able to track someone else down
off-site after their chat ended.

I didn’t really know what to expect when I launched Omegle. Would anyone even care about some Web site that an 18 year
old kid made in his bedroom in his parents’ house in Vermont, with no marketing budget? But it became popular almost
instantly after launch, and grew organically from there, reaching millions of daily users. I believe this had something to do
with meeting new people being a basic human need, and with Omegle being among the best ways to fulfill that need. As
the saying goes: “If you build a better mousetrap, the world will beat a path to your door.”

Over the years, people have used Omegle to explore foreign cultures; to get advice about their lives from impartial third
parties; and to help alleviate feelings of loneliness and isolation. I’ve even heard stories of soulmates meeting on Omegle,
and getting married. Those are only some of the highlights.

2 of 5 11/9/23, 4:46 AM
Omegle https://www.omegle.com/

Unfortunately, there are also lowlights. Virtually every tool can be used for good or for evil, and that is especially true of
communication tools, due to their innate flexibility. The telephone can be used to wish your grandmother “happy birthday”,
but it can also be used to call in a bomb threat. There can be no honest accounting of Omegle without acknowledging that
some people misused it, including to commit unspeakably heinous crimes.

I believe in a responsibility to be a “good Samaritan”, and to implement reasonable measures to fight crime and other
misuse. That is exactly what Omegle did. In addition to the basic safety feature of anonymity, there was a great deal of
moderation behind the scenes, including state-of-the-art AI operating in concert with a wonderful team of human
moderators. Omegle punched above its weight in content moderation, and I’m proud of what we accomplished.

Omegle’s moderation even had a positive impact beyond the site. Omegle worked with law enforcement agencies, and the
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, to help put evildoers in prison where they belong. There are “people”
rotting behind bars right now thanks in part to evidence that Omegle proactively collected against them, and tipped the
authorities off to.

All that said, the fight against crime isn’t one that can ever truly be won. It’s a never-ending battle that must be fought and
re-fought every day; and even if you do the very best job it is possible for you to do, you may make a sizable dent, but you
won’t “win” in any absolute sense of that word. That’s heartbreaking, but it’s also a basic lesson of criminology, and one
that I think the vast majority of people understand on some level. Even superheroes, the fictional characters that our
culture imbues with special powers as a form of wish fulfillment in the fight against crime, don’t succeed at eliminating
crime altogether.

In recent years, it seems like the whole world has become more ornery. Maybe that has something to do with the
pandemic, or with political disagreements. Whatever the reason, people have become faster to attack, and slower to
recognize each other’s shared humanity. One aspect of this has been a constant barrage of attacks on communication
services, Omegle included, based on the behavior of a malicious subset of users.

To an extent, it is reasonable to question the policies and practices of any place where crime has occurred. I have always
welcomed constructive feedback; and indeed, Omegle implemented a number of improvements based on such feedback
over the years. However, the recent attacks have felt anything but constructive. The only way to please these people is to
stop offering the service. Sometimes they say so, explicitly and avowedly; other times, it can be inferred from their act of
setting standards that are not humanly achievable. Either way, the net result is the same.

Omegle is the direct target of these attacks, but their ultimate victim is you: all of you out there who have used, or would
have used, Omegle to improve your lives, and the lives of others. When they say Omegle shouldn’t exist, they are really
saying that you shouldn’t be allowed to use it; that you shouldn’t be allowed to meet random new people online. That idea
is anathema to the ideals I cherish – specifically, to the bedrock principle of a free society that, when restrictions are

3 of 5 11/9/23, 4:46 AM
Omegle https://www.omegle.com/

imposed to prevent crime, the burden of those restrictions must not be targeted at innocent victims or potential victims of
crime.

Consider the idea that society ought to force women to dress modestly in order to prevent rape. One counter-argument is
that rapists don’t really target women based on their clothing; but a more powerful counter-argument is that, irrespective
of what rapists do, women’s rights should remain intact. If society robs women of their rights to bodily autonomy and self-
expression based on the actions of rapists – even if it does so with the best intentions in the world – then society is
practically doing the work of rapists for them.

Fear can be a valuable tool, guiding us away from danger. However, fear can also be a mental cage that keeps us from all of
the things that make life worth living. Individuals and families must be allowed to strike the right balance for themselves,
based on their own unique circumstances and needs. A world of mandatory fear is a world ruled by fear – a dark place
indeed.

I’ve done my best to weather the attacks, with the interests of Omegle’s users – and the broader principle – in mind. If
something as simple as meeting random new people is forbidden, what’s next? That is far and away removed from anything
that could be considered a reasonable compromise of the principle I outlined. Analogies are a limited tool, but a physical-
world analogy might be shutting down Central Park because crime occurs there – or perhaps more provocatively,
destroying the universe because it contains evil. A healthy, free society cannot endure when we are collectively afraid of
each other to this extent.

Unfortunately, what is right doesn’t always prevail. As much as I wish circumstances were different, the stress and expense
of this fight – coupled with the existing stress and expense of operating Omegle, and fighting its misuse – are simply too
much. Operating Omegle is no longer sustainable, financially nor psychologically. Frankly, I don’t want to have a heart
attack in my 30s.

The battle for Omegle has been lost, but the war against the Internet rages on. Virtually every online communication
service has been subject to the same kinds of attack as Omegle; and while some of them are much larger companies with
much greater resources, they all have their breaking point somewhere. I worry that, unless the tide turns soon, the Internet
I fell in love with may cease to exist, and in its place, we will have something closer to a souped-up version of TV – focused
largely on passive consumption, with much less opportunity for active participation and genuine human connection. If that
sounds like a bad idea to you, please consider donating to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an organization that fights
for your rights online.

From the bottom of my heart, thank you to everyone who used Omegle for positive purposes, and to everyone who
contributed to the site’s success in any way. I’m so sorry I couldn’t keep fighting for you.

4 of 5 11/9/23, 4:46 AM
Omegle https://www.omegle.com/

Sincerely,
Leif K-Brooks
Founder, Omegle.com LLC

To contact Omegle, please visit here for more information.

5 of 5 11/9/23, 4:46 AM

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy