How Did The Women Question Become Releva
How Did The Women Question Become Releva
SHIKHA SHARMA
Abstract
In the pre-modern era, women and girls were pressured to behave and dress more
traditionally femininely. The society was particularly patriarchal, and women were
subjected as subordinates. The women's question emerged in India in the nineteenth
century. This period was marked by the growth of middle-class reform movements
across different parts of India, which raised critical questions about social practices
such as sati, widow remarriage act, women's education, Etc. The most critical analyses
of women and men in Indian society have explored their positions in several ways.
The women's question spiralled into the national movement as a political concern that
needed people's attention and shaped a new India for Indian women. Although the
debate is still ongoing, the results remain outdated.
Indian women have been analyzed as symbols of status and prestige, whose seclusion
and supervision are essential to maintaining family purity and reputation. They have
been analyzing as objects of exchange (the giving of a daughter in marriage) which is
the pivotal ranked transaction. Men were likely to curb women's rights and let them be
in household chores.
Moreover, women have been analyzing as economic goods, productive capital assets,
or luxury goods.1 This analysis has helped explain different female mortality rates at
various ages by the economic value of women. Globally, over 2.7 billion women are
legally restricted from having the same jobs as men.2 Indian women have been taken
as symbols of status and prestige, whose seclusion and supervision are essential to
maintaining family purity and reputation. They have been term as objects of exchange,
and the giving of daughters in marriage is the crucial ranked transaction in which girls
lower in status are given to men higher in status.3
SOCIAL REFORM MOVEMENTS
The social reformers believed in the principle of Individual liberty, freedom, and
equality of all human beings irrespective of sex, color, race, caste, or religion.
Accordingly, they had attacked rigorously several orthodox, traditional, authoritarian,
and hierarchical social institutions and launched social reform movement to liberate
the Indian women from their inferiority.
The socio-religious reform movements in the nineteenth century paved the way for the
emerging change in society and the position of women. The centrality of women's
problems was an intriguing element in these reform movements. The two immense
Indian reformers led vast movements for developing women's situation in Indian
society.
Furthermore, these analyses show that controlling women at all stages of their life
cycle was essential to the continuation of traditional family and caste patterns. Social
reformers like Raja Rammohun Roy and Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar understood and
raised women's questions in nineteenth-century India. They both given an immense
account of women's condition in nineteenth-century India. The immoral practices like
Sati and Widowhood showed womanhood's brutality, unfairness, and dementing
condition. The term 'Sati', also often referred to as 'suttee', translates to a "chaste
woman" in Hindi and Sanskrit texts. Raja Rammohun Roy had stood up against the
orthodox practice like Sati. He was commissioned to put a stoppage on this immoral
practice of sati. Moreover, on the other hand, Vidyasagar was shocked by the plight of
women after widowhood. They both stood up for the woman's question, which needed
reframing.
Raja Rammohun Roy, regarded as the first modern champion of women's rights, made
efforts to abolish the orthodox rites called Sati, or widow immolation. Also, historian
Lata Mani explored the ideological issues that informed the movement for sati
abolition. She wrote a book named Contentious Traditions: the debate on Sati in
Colonial India. She argued in this book that the women burned were marginal, and the
controversy was over the definitions of Hindu traditions. The history of widow
burning is one of the paradoxes. The chief players in the argument argued over the
religious basis of sati. The debate normalized the violence of sati and supported the
misconception that it was a voluntary act of wifely devotion.5
In addition, the Hindu caste system depended upon maintaining relationships between
hierarchically ranked castes. Caste endogamy, or marriage within one's caste, was
enforced through the control of marriages by families and mainly through the control
of women. Thus, while women in India are highly idealized, they have been
systematically subordinated. In the past, the reasons for their subordination were very
explicit, vigorously enforced by religious and secular authorities, and most strongly
enforced by the social units of caste and family.
Raja Rammohun Roy founded the Brahmo Samaj in Calcutta in 1828. It advocated
reform and eventually abolition of the traditional caste system and legislation aimed at
improving the social status of women and more excellent protection of children.
Brahmo Samaj altered Bengali society in the nineteenth century. It was a Hindu
reformist movement that began in the era when the reform movements were taking
place. The focus of this society was the emancipation of women in the society and
equality of religions, rejection of the caste system. However, the question arises,
"Does this movement change the perspective among traditionalists that women should
not be accustomed to being engaged in these horrific acts of Sati?"
On September 4, 1987, Roop Kanwar, an 18-year-old, decided to jump into her
husband's funeral pyre in the act of self-immolation. The large group of people
watching this action described it as a voluntary action. This act shook the state of
Rajasthan and sparked massive countrywide attention. Moreover, the acts of voluntary
sati lead to the question of women's perspective and consent in self-immolation.
Furthermore, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar was a powerful voice against the oppression
of women in nineteenth-century Bengal. He opened a school for women and was
instrumental in bringing the Hindu Widows' remarriage Act in 1856. He had made
awareness in society about widow remarriage. He propagated the idea of 'Hindu
widow remarriage', and while working on this issue, he came across the more dynamic
approach that was women's education. Whenever we talk about the Bengal
Renaissance, we always encounter his name. He was a crucial figure in contemplating
the new future for women in a Patriarchal society in the nineteenth century.
CONCLUSION
Thus, the women's question arose as a topic of discussion in the nineteenth century
because the most exploited sector in those times was of social strata. Men's and
women's roles at that time were differentiated regarding inferiority and superiority.
Patriarchy was prevalent for a long time, meaning a society dominated by a male
figure, and men have greater power and decision-making.
However, the literary and reform activities were led by men, and men principally
engaged in them until the twentieth century. Nonetheless, more radical reforms like
widow remarriage made little headway. On the other hand, the growth of education for
women and the rising marriage age had significant and irreversible effects on women
and Indian social institutions. As a result, women's situation worsened during the
nineteenth century, and the social reformers looked up to it to bring out a change that
could transform women's lives in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
Social and political reforms also brought women into new spheres of public life. For
example, the nationalist movement included political reforms such as voting for
women and involving women as participants, especially under Gandhi's leadership. In
addition, women gained equal rights in the constitution of independent India. Thus, the
new nation's legal system and political and social goals provided a context in which
some women could take advantage of new opportunities, and Indian women have
achieved higher participation rates in public and professional areas than women in the
United States.
Sometimes the values sanctioning the increased participation of women in public life
were traditional, as in the professions of medicine and higher education. In the first
case, male physicians' treatment of Indian women posed cultural problems, and female
physicians filled a real need. Most women specialized in midwifery and gynaecology,
and patients preferred married female physicians to unmarried ones. There was also
family pressure for daughters to become doctors rather than nurses, for nursing was
initially associated with polluting tasks and Christian or Anglo-Indian practitioners.
Finally, a doctor's career was both prestigious and lucrative.
Missionaries and the Indian government encouraged not only female medical students
through the creation of separate schools and financial support but also provided secure
employment so that Indian female doctors avoided the entrepreneurial activities
associated with private medical practice. In the case of higher education, emphasis on
the seclusion and purity of women necessitated the development of separate
educational institutions and female faculties for female students. It thus contributed to
the high proportion of female academics in India today.
Despite an improvement in the position of women in modern Indian society,
evidenced by general patterns such as those above, it is hard to measure the extent to
which women control their lives. That is the goal, however distant, against which any
progress toward women's liberation must be measured, and that kind of change, in
India, must be measured at the levels of family and caste. Social relations
institutionalized at these levels most directly affect individual women.
Women of all spheres were attracted to the reforms and participated in the revolution.
Women like Sarojini Naidu and Aruna Asaf Ali gave an immense literature level.
Bengali women like Rassundari Devi had vibrantly written Bengali literature. Women
like her encouraged so many who were subordinate during the 19th century.
Sarojini Naidu had spoken on the differences faced by the Indian women in society,
which divide them based on gender. The main issue was the rights of the widows. She
stood up for the widows to have equal representation in society as men. At the 22nd
session of the Indian National Conference held in 1908, she was instrumental in
passing a resolution demanding educational facilities for widows. In addition, she
established women's homes and remove obstacles to the remarriage of widows.
Furthermore, all these subjects became controversial at that time.
Furthermore, quoting the book written by Ruby Lal, "Domesticity and power in the
Early Mughal World" aptly present this narrative of the public and private spheres.
The private spheres are considered to be the domestic, the banal, and the household.
Usually, when talking about the women from the royal family, they were close to the
Emperor/king. They might take part in royal decisions and matters as well. The levels
of domestic life were relevant through many stages of historical times.
The Mughal harem showed the private life of royal households in India. The account
of the harem was written off from a narrow lens of stereotypical. Mughal harem
The Indian women were seen to be engaged in the knowledge that made them inferior
from the worldwide view. Captain Willard quotes in 1834 about the Indian women
fond of singing songs that mostly appear licentious and voluptuous. The plight of
women in the modern Indian framework has been seen in the Bengal region in the
Eighteenth and Nineteenth centuries.
Women played a leading role in implementing a model of female education in Bengal
that was primarily fashioned by contemporary English missionaries. The patriarchal
hegemony had framed the private lives of women to be bearers of the minor children
and handlers of household chores.
Moreover, the narrative that women cannot be superior to men had been seen to be
changed when the outbreak of the revolutionist movement took place by women
suffragists in the West in the nineteenth century. Indian women tend to think more
provocatively about their rights and power.
There were subtle differences among nineteenth-century Bengali urban elite members
over how women should be educated and allowed free movement in society. The
deplorable spate of "honor killings" or female foeticide, and the refusal to pass the
women's reservation Bill, are all testimony of the challenges ahead. There are still
many battles that the country leaders need to fight for the comfortability of women's
lives in the coming centuries.
NOTES
1. Shirley Lindenbaum, “The Value of Women,” paper presented at the Ninth
Annual Bengal Conference, 1973.
2. World Bank, Women, Business and the Law 2018. (Washington, D.C., 2018).
Available at: http://wbl.worldbank.org/
4. Hanna Papanek’s Journal Article “Purdah: Separate Worlds and Symbol Shelter
water” was published by: Cambridge University Press.
7. How one religious scholar fought for women’s rights and won, an article by
Sarmila Bose, is Senior Research Associate, Centre for International Studies,
Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford.
8. Tanika Sarkar’s book “Words to Win, The Making of Amar Jiban: A Modern
Autobiography”
9. https://www.eng-literature.com/2022/01/rassundari-devi-amar-jiban-
summary.html
10. Chaudhuri, Maitrayee (2011). (First print, 1993). The Indian Women’s
Movement.
11. Vina Mazumdar Emergence of the women’s question in India and the role of
women’s studies
12. Rajeshwari Sunder Rajan, Real, and Imagined Women: Gender, Culture, and
Postcolonialism, Routledge, London, 1993.
13. Forbes, Geraldine, Women in Modern India, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge, 1996
14. Sangari, Kumkum, and Sudesh Vaid, Recasting Women, Essays in Colonial
History, Kali for Women, New Delhi, 1989.