0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views8 pages

Class 5

1) The document introduces ladder operators a+ and a- that raise or lower the energy of quantum harmonic oscillator states by ħω. 2) Applying the raising operator a+ to an eigenstate ψ yields another eigenstate a+ψ with energy increased by ħω. Applying the lowering operator a- lowers the energy by ħω. 3) The lowest energy state ψ0 has energy E0 = 1/2ħω and satisfies a-ψ0 = 0. Higher energy states are obtained by applying the raising operator to ψ0.

Uploaded by

Physics Msc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views8 pages

Class 5

1) The document introduces ladder operators a+ and a- that raise or lower the energy of quantum harmonic oscillator states by ħω. 2) Applying the raising operator a+ to an eigenstate ψ yields another eigenstate a+ψ with energy increased by ħω. Applying the lowering operator a- lowers the energy by ħω. 3) The lowest energy state ψ0 has energy E0 = 1/2ħω and satisfies a-ψ0 = 0. Higher energy states are obtained by applying the raising operator to ψ0.

Uploaded by

Physics Msc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Class 5: Quantum harmonic oscillator – Ladder operators

Ladder operators
The time independent Schrödinger equation for the quantum harmonic oscillator can be written as

1
2m
( p 2 + m 2ω 2 x 2 )ψ = Eψ , (5.1)

where the momentum operator p is

d
p = −iℏ . (5.2)
dx

If p were a number, we could factorize

p 2 + m 2ω 2 x 2 = ( −ip + mω x )( ip + mω x ) . (5.3)

However, we need to remember that p is an operator. In fact, because

 d  d 
( −ip + mω x )( ip + mω x )ψ =  −ℏ + mω x   ℏ + mω x ψ
 dx   dx 
 d   dψ 
=  −ℏ + mω x   ℏ + mω xψ 
 dx   dx 
d  dψ  dψ
= −ℏ ℏ + mω xψ  + mω xℏ + m 2ω 2 x 2ψ
dx  dx  dx (5.4)
d 2ψ d dψ
= −ℏ2 2
− ℏ ( mω xψ ) + mω xℏ + m 2ω 2 x 2ψ
dx dx dx
d 2ψ
= − ℏ 2 2 − mω ℏψ + m 2ω 2 x 2ψ
dx
= p ψ + m 2ω 2 x 2ψ − mω ℏψ
2

we see that there is an extra term, such that

p 2 + m2ω 2 x 2 = ( −ip + mω x )( ip + mω x ) + mω ℏ (5.5)

Even so it is useful to consider the two dimensionless operators

1
a+ = ( −ip + mω x ) , (5.6)
2ℏmω

and

1
1
a− = ( +ip + mω x ) . (5.7)
2ℏmω

The reason for labeling the operators with subscripts + and – will become clear later. Since the order of
operation is important, we have

1 1
a− a+ = ( +ip + mω x ) ( −ip + mω x )
2ℏmω 2ℏmω
(5.8)
1
=  p 2 + m2ω 2 x 2 − imω ( xp − px )  ,
2ℏmω 

and

1 1
a+ a− = ( −ip + mω x ) ( +ip + mω x )
2ℏmω 2ℏmω
(5.9)
1
=  p 2 + m2ω 2 x 2 + imω ( xp − px )  .
2ℏmω

Each expression contains the combination xp − px which is called the commutator of x and p.

The standard notation for the commutator of two operators A and B is

[ A, B ] = AB − BA. (5.10)

Since

dψ d
[ x, p ]ψ = −i ℏ x + iℏ ( xψ ) = iℏψ , (5.11)
dx dx

we can write

[ x, p ] = iℏ. (5.12)

Also, because the Hamiltonian is

p 2 mω 2 x 2 1
H=
2m
+
2
=
2m
( p2 + m2ω 2 x2 ) , (5.13)

we have

1  1  H 1
a− a+ =
ℏω  H + 2 ℏω  = ℏω + 2 . (5.14)

Similarly

2
1  1  H 1
a+ a− =  H + ℏω  = − . (5.15)
ℏω  2  ℏω 2

These last two equations can be combined to show that

1
H= ℏω ( a− a+ + a+ a− ) . (5.16)
2

We also see that

[ a− , a+ ] = a− a+ − a+ a− = 1. (5.17)

The Schrödinger equation can be written as

 1 E
 a− a+ − ψ = ψ, (5.18)
 2 ℏω

or as

 1 E
 a+ a− + ψ = ψ. (5.19)
 2 ℏω

Suppose we have a solution ψ of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to energy E. Then a+ψ is also
a solution to the Schrödinger equation but for energy E + ℏω. To see why, consider

 1
H ( a+ψ ) = ℏω  a+ a− +  ( a+ψ )
 2
 1 
= ℏω  a+ a− a+ψ + a+ψ  (5.20)
 2 
 1 
= ℏω a+  a− a+ψ + ψ  .
 2 

Now using equation (5.14), this gives

 1 1 1 
H ( a+ψ ) = ℏω a+  Hψ + ψ + ψ  = a+ ( Eψ + ℏωψ )
 ℏω 2 2  (5.21)
= ( E + ℏω ) a+ψ ,

which proves our contention.

Similarly, if ψ is a solution of the Schrödinger equation corresponding to energy E, then a−ψ is also a
solution to the Schrödinger equation but for energy E − ℏω. The operators a+ and a− are called ladder

3
operators, because the raising operator a+ moves up the energy ladder by a step of ℏω and the lowering
operator a− moves down the energy ladder by a step of ℏω.

Since the minimum value of the potential energy is zero and occurs at a single value of x, the lowest
energy for the QHO must be greater than zero. Let the wave function for the minimum energy be ψ 0 ( x ) .
Since there is no energy level below this minimum value, we must have

a−ψ 0 = 0. (5.22)

When combined with the normalization condition, this equation allows us to find ψ 0 ( x ) , since it gives

( +ip + mω x )ψ 0 = 0. (5.23)

The normalized solution is found to be

14 mω x 2
 mω  −
ψ 0 ( x) =   e
2ℏ
. (5.24)
 πℏ 

The energy of this state is easily found by applying the Hamiltonian operator given by equation (5.15)

 1 1
Hψ 0 = ℏω  a+ a− + ψ 0 = ℏωψ 0 . (5.25)
 2 2

We see that the lowest energy is

1
E0 = ℏω , (5.26)
2

and by applying the raising operator, the energy of the nth state is

 1
En =  n +  ℏ ω , (5.27)
 2

Normalization of the wave functions


Although the ladder operators can be used to create a new wave function from a given normalized wave
function, the new wave function is not normalized. To determine the normalization constant, we need to
explore some more properties of the ladder operators. First consider

∫ f ( a g ) dx,

+ (5.28)
−∞

where f and g are functions of x. Putting in the explicit form of the operator, we have

4
∞ ∞
1  dg 
∫ f ( a+ g ) dx = ∫  −ℏf
∗ ∗
+ mω xf ∗ g  dx
−∞ 2ℏmω −∞
dx 
1  d ( f ∗g )

df ∗ 
∫   dx

= − ℏ + ℏ g + mω xf g (5.29)
2ℏmω −∞  
dx dx

1 ∞ 1

 df ∗ ∗ 
  ∫

=  − ℏf g  +  ℏg dx + mω xf g  dx.
2ℏmω −∞
2ℏmω −∞  

Provided f ∗ g → 0 as x → ∞, the first term on the last line is zero. Also the remaining integral is

1

 df ∗ ∗ 

∫−∞ ℏg dx + mω xf g  dx = −∞∫ g ( a− f ) dx.



(5.30)
2ℏmω

Hence we have shown that


∞ ∞

−∞
∫ f ∗ ( a+ g ) dx = ∫ g (a
−∞
− f ∗ ) dx. (5.31)

In a similar manner, we can show that


∞ ∞

−∞
∫ f ∗ ( a− g ) dx = ∫ g (a
−∞
+ f ∗ ) dx. (5.32)

(The operators a− and a+ are said to be Hermitian conjugates.)

Suppose ψ n represents a normalized wave functions for any value of n. Let g = ψ n and f = a+ψ n in
equation (5.31). Then
∞ ∞ ∞

∫ ( a+ψ n ) ( a+ψ n ) dx = ∫ ψ n  a− ( a+ψ n )  dx = ∫ ψ n ( a− a+ψ n ) dx.


∗ ∗ ∗
(5.33)
−∞ −∞ −∞

Using equation (5.14) and equation (5.27), we have

a− a+ψ n* = ( n + 1)ψ n* . (5.34)

On using this in equation (5.33), we get


∞ ∞

∫ ( a ψ ) ( a ψ ) dx = ∫ ψ ( n + 1)ψ
∗ ∗
+ n + n n n dx. (5.35)
−∞ −∞

Since the wave functions are assumed normalized, we see that

5
a+ψ n = n + 1ψ n +1. (5.36)

In a similar way, by starting with equation (5.32), we find

a−ψ n = nψ n −1. (5.37)

Since

1 1 2 1 3
ψn = a+ψ n −1 = ( a+ ) ψ n−2 = ( a+ ) ψ n−3 = ⋯,
n n ( n − 1) n ( n − 1)( n − 2 )

we see that

1 n
ψn = ( a+ ) ψ 0 . (5.38)
n!

Problem 2.12 Find x , p , x 2 , p 2 , and T for the nth stationary state of the harmonic oscillator.
Check that the Uncertainty Principle is satisfied.

From equations (5.6) and (5.7), we find

2mω
a− + a+ = x, (5.39)

and

2
a− − a+ = ip. (5.40)
ℏmω

Hence

∞ ∞

x = ∫ ψ n xψ n dx = ∫ ψ n ( a− + a+ )ψ n dx = 0,
−∞
2mω −∞

where use has been made of the orthogonality of the wave functions, and the lowering and raising
properties of the ladder operators.

Similarly we see that p = 0.

Also

6
∞ ∞ ∞
ℏ ℏ
= ∫ ψ n x ψ n dx = ∫ ∫ ψ n ( a− 2 + a− a+ + a+ a− + a+ 2 )ψ n dx
2
x 2 2
ψ n ( a− + a+ ) ψ n dx =
−∞
2mω −∞ 2mω −∞
En  1 ℏ
= 2
= n+  ,
mω  2  mω

where we have used equation (5.16). Similarly


∞ ∞ ∞
ℏmω ℏmω
= ∫ ψ n p ψ n dx = − ∫ ∫ ψ n ( a− 2 − a− a+ − a+ a_ + a+ 2 )ψ n dx
2
p 2 2
ψ n ( a− − a+ ) ψ n dx = −
−∞
2 −∞
2 −∞

ℏmω ℏmω 2 En  1
= ∫
2 −∞
ψ n ( a− a+ + a+ a_ )ψ n dx =
2 ℏω 
=  n +  ℏmω.
2

Also,

p2 1 1 1
T = =  n +  ℏω = En .
2m 2 2 2

To check whether the Uncertainty Principle holds, consider

 1 ℏ  1  1
σ xσ p = x2 p2 =  n +  ⋅  n +  ℏmω =  n +  ℏ.
 2  mω  2  2

We see that the principle holds, with equality for n = 0.

Orthonormality of the wave functions


The stationary state wave functions for the harmonic oscillator are orthonormal, i.e.

∫ψ ψ
−∞
m n dx = δ mn . (5.41)

The orthogonality of the wave function can be shown by considering


∞ ∞ ∞

∫ ψ m Hψ n dx = ∫ ψ m Enψ n dx = En ∫ ψ mψ n dx.
−∞ −∞ −∞
(5.42)

Now

∞ ∞
 ℏ2 d 2  ℏ2

d 2ψ n

∫ ψ m Hψ n dx = −∞∫ ψ m  − 2m dx 2 + V ψ n dx = − 2m −∞∫ ψ m dx 2 dx + −∞∫ ψ mVψ n dx


−∞
(5.43)

By integration by parts, we have

7
∞ ∞ ∞
d 2ψ n  dψ n  dψ m dψ n
∫−∞ m dx 2 dx = ψ m dx  −∞ − −∞∫ dx dx dx
ψ
∞ ∞
(5.44)

 dψ n   dψ m  d 2ψ m
= ψ m


dx  −∞ 
ψ n + ∫ dx 2 ψ n dx.
dx  −∞ −∞

Applying the boundary conditions, the first two terms on the right hand side are both equal to zero.
Putting the result in equation (5.43), we have
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
ℏ2 d 2ψ m
∫ ψ m Hψ n dx = −
−∞
∫ n dx 2 dx + −∞∫ ψ nVψ m dx = −∞∫ ψ n Hψ m dx = Em −∞∫ ψ nψ m dx.
2m −∞
ψ (5.45)

Hence
∞ ∞
Em ∫ ψ nψ m dx = En ∫ ψ nψ m dx. (5.46)
−∞ −∞

Because the energy values are not equal if m ≠ n, we see that the wave functions must be orthogonal.

This is a quite general result, which does not depend on the particular potential energy function. Two
wave functions that have different energies are orthogonal.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy