Nike Case Study (AutoRecovered)
Nike Case Study (AutoRecovered)
GROUP:
JONALYN PACUMBABA
KIMBERLY SINANGOTE
SUNSHINE NEPOMUCENO
RUSSEL PETRONILO
JB PRUDENTE
Introduction
Nike was created in 1964 by Bill Bowerman, a nationally known University of Oregon
track coach, and Phil Knight, a former track athlete. Originally known as Blue Ribbon
Sports, the two began by distributing Netsuke Tiger sneakers to players around Oregon.
After track and sporting events, Phil Knight would frequently sell sneakers from the trunk
of his car. Their primary motivation for entering the athletic shoe industry was to equip
athletes with higher-quality footwear. In 1978, Blue Ribbon Sports officially became
Nike, Inc., after immediately terminating its affiliation with Onitsuka Tiger. The company
was named after Nike, the Greek goddess of triumph, and it created the world-famous
"swoosh" emblem as well as a new creative athletic shoe design. Nike went public in
1980 after only two years, with a 50% market share of the US athletic shoe market.
Nike is now the world's largest provider of athletic footwear and apparel. Globally, the
company employs around 30,000 employees. More than 6,000 people work at the Nike
World Headquarters, which is located near Beaverton, Oregon. Nike's continued success
can be attributed to the company's unique designs, development, and marketing tactics
for high-quality footwear, apparel, accessories, and equipment. Nike reported record
revenues of $18.6 billion for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2008.
Nike has gone 35% digital and is planning to reach 50% by 2025. It has shown
immense growth and is expected to close year 2022 with over 50-billion-dollar revenue.
Strategically Nike is also prioritising its DTC (directly to consumer) sales. Covid 19 has
just showed an increase in its sales across all segments and brands. Nike also recently
hit its first 5-billion-dollar quarter. All these took place with recession in a lot of sectors
and segments all across the world which makes us think about Nike with a fresh
perspective. “Our goal isn’t merely to take market share. Our goal is also to grow the
entire market,” CEO John Donahoe said. To stay current, Nike continuously works on its
trends, marketing and communications. It has always been extremely competitive and
up to date with the latest trends in the distribution network, growing its DTC channels,
setting trends on digital media like Tik-Tok or Instagram reels.
What programs has your company put in place to expand diversity and
inclusion in the workplace? List three programs that you believe may cultivate
diversity and acceptance.
How does diversity spawn innovation in the work- place?
Discuss culture as a form of diversity
S.W.O.T Analysis
Nike’s strengths are the internal factors that reinforce or empower the business. These
strengths are considered positive indicators of athletic goods business potential and
success in this internal analysis component of the SWOT analysis model. Nike uses the
following strengths for business growth and development:
Nike has the strongest and most valuable sporting goods brand in the international
market. In the SWOT analysis model, this internal factor functions as a strength that the
company can use to improve its industry position against other athletic and leisure goods
businesses. Nike also has the strength of product innovation, which is a factor that
makes its footwear products competitive. Product innovation contributes to product
quality and attractiveness, and influences business profitability despite aggressive
competition in the sporting goods market. The organizational culture of Nike Inc. affects
human resource support for such a strength noted in this SWOT analysis. On the other
hand, strong control on product distribution is an internal factor that strengthens the
athletic shoes company by optimizing its ability to reach customers. This strength in the
SWOT analysis of Nike Inc. points to the importance of retailers and sales channels in
the growth of the business. For example, the company’s basketball and tennis shoes are
sold through various retailers and platforms, such as Amazon, Costco, eBay, and
Business weaknesses are barriers that prevent Nike from maximizing its performance. In
this internal analysis component of the SWOT analysis, such factors limit the growth of
the sports shoes, equipment, and clothing business. The following weaknesses are
relevant to this case of Nike Inc.:
The limited network of company-owned retail locations makes Nike highly dependent on
other retailers. The selling prices of the company’s sporting goods are subject to the
influence of large retailers, such as Walmart. In this SWOT analysis, such an internal
factor weakens Nike’s control on its product distribution and sales. In addition, the
limited diversification of production locations is considered a weakness in this SWOT
analysis of the footwear and equipment business. This internal factor refers to the
company’s reliance on a small number of large shoes, apparel, and equipment
production facilities that are mainly located in Asia. Such a business condition subjects
the company to economic and sociopolitical trends in the region, in addition to the trends
enumerated in the PESTEL/PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. On the other hand, the
corporate image issues linked to labor practices in footwear, equipment, and apparel
factories contracted by the company are a weakness relevant to this SWOT analysis. This
internal factor affects brand image, consumer perception, and investor confidence, but
Nike’s corporate social responsibility strategies and stakeholder management efforts
partially address such a weakness.
Opportunities pave the way for Nike Inc.’s further growth and development in the global
market. In the external analysis component of the SWOT analysis model, such
opportunities can help improve the sporting goods business. Nike has opportunities for
the following:
3. Healthier customer perception of the business through policies for labor and
employment practices
Threats to the business can decrease Nike’s industry position. These threats are external
factors that harm corporate image and lower the competitiveness of the company’s
shoes, equipment, and apparel. The following threats are relevant to this external
analysis component of the SWOT analysis of Nike Inc.:
1. Tough competition
Competitors, such as Adidas and New Balance, are the biggest threat to the company,
imposing a strong force against the business, as shown in the Porter’s Five Forces
analysis of Nike Inc. In the SWOT analysis model, tough competition is an external
strategic factor that threatens the company’s market share for sporting goods. Another
Recommendations
Nike has implemented several programs to foster diversity and inclusion in the
workplace. Here are three programs that may cultivate diversity and acceptance:
Conclusion
Diversity within Nike has proved to be a catalyst for innovation. The diverse perspectives
brought by employees with different backgrounds, experiences, and ideas enable the
company to think creatively and explore multiple solutions to complex problems. This
Overall, Nike’s efforts in embracing diversity and inclusion have had a positive impact on
the company’s culture, innovation, employee engagement, and market competitiveness.
By prioritizing diversity and inclusion, Nike sets an example for other organizations to
follow in creating a more inclusive and diverse working environment.