Writing coursework can be quite challenging, especially when it comes to subjects like statistics,

which require a deep understanding of concepts and analytical skills. From gathering data to
analyzing it and presenting findings, there are numerous steps involved, each demanding meticulous
attention to detail.

For GCSE-level statistics coursework, students often face the added pressure of ensuring their work
meets specific academic standards while grappling with complex mathematical principles. It's a time-
consuming process that requires dedication and expertise.

Given these challenges, seeking assistance from professional writing services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ can be a wise decision. Their team of experienced writers can provide tailored
support, guiding you through each stage of the coursework process. Whether you need help with
topic selection, data analysis, or crafting a compelling conclusion, they're equipped to offer expert
assistance.

By entrusting your coursework to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
uncertainty that often accompanies academic assignments. Plus, you'll have peace of mind knowing
that your work is in capable hands, allowing you to focus on other priorities without sacrificing your
academic performance.

So, if you're struggling with your statistics coursework or simply want to ensure the best possible
outcome, consider reaching out to ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ for professional assistance. Your
academic success is worth investing in, and their services can help you achieve your goals efficiently
and effectively.
I will know if a result is anomalous if it does not fit the pattern of the rest of the data, if I do come
across an anomalous piece of data, I shall choose another piece of data using random sampling. I also
took the standard deviation of the values and plotted each stratums deviation on to a bar chart. This
is because the more able pupils have improved more than less able pupils and they have all improved
around the same amount. I only have 52 results for girls as the High School wouldn't allow the
experiment to be carried out in lessons. Therefore people in Year 11 have larger feet than people in
Year 7, and this is numerically proven by the means that I calculated in both the grouped and raw
data cases. Also they will have very varied improvements as some will have tried harder than others.
This can be used for higher or foundation, with higher questions marked in RED for easy
differentiation. ?3.00 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your
happiness. I can use this equation to estimate what exam mark a boy would get if his error in
estimation was 30. The first word selected was the fifth, the second word the tenth, the third word
the fifteenth and so on. If the box is shifted significantly to the low end, it is positively skewed; if
the box is shifted significantly to the high end, it is negatively skewed, however, none of the four
box plots are shifted significantly to either the high end or the low end. Scatter graphs show the
correlation between data sets and the measure of strength between them. I have chosen to look at
height and weight mainly because in this line of enquiry my data will be numerical and continuous,
meaning that I will be able to produce a more detailed analysis. However, you can also see that there
are some outliers, so I am going to find out the outliers by the following calculations. Below you can
see the box-plot charts that I drew on my computer. I will also calculate the mean of both the raw
and grouped data for both year 7 and 11 to try and quantitatively prove a relationship and show
whether I was correct in thinking that on average year 7 students will have smaller feet than year 11
students. For example, if I had chosen to look at eye colour and hair colour my analysis would be
limited and therefore my investigation may be imprecise. To take a stratified sample I will divide the
whole population of children into year group and gender e.g. Year 7 Boys. I will then take 10% of
each stratum to gain fair representation of each stratum. I keep on hearing from my sisters that girls
are better than boys in education. Looking at the same pieces of data for the females, we can work
out that the range is in fact 5KG less than that of the males. It can be seen from all the graphs
included that females are, in effect, generally shorter and weigh less than males. I will then use a
technique to see how closely the children (of different ages) choices correlate. I feel a sample of 200
words would be fitting, as it is large enough to take the general style of an article in, but not so small
that there may be some misrepresentative anomalies. Whereas the Vauxhalls that will have a lower
mileage will have a higher second hand price rate than the Fiats and the fords. Spearman’s rank is
helpful as we can use it when the data is not jointly normally distributed and rank order correlation
provides a very quick and easy to use method of modelling correlation between probability
distributions. That is the reason why boys by this time have a better average than the girls. After each
of the diagram I would explain how I did the diagram and what people prefer and why. I will do this
for boys and girls separately as they have their growth spurts at different times. With this, I expect
there to be more extreme data from year 7 than year 11. I will work out the mean and the standard
Deviation for both the Girls and the Boys results. I collected my data using random sampling
because after having looked at stratified sampling I decided it wasn’t the best choice as the sets all
have around the same number of people.
This gives me a total of 90 results which will be used in questions 3 and 4 as well as this one. I will
know if a result is anomalous if it does not fit the pattern of the rest of the data, if I do come across
an anomalous piece of data, I shall choose another piece of data using random sampling. It is easy t
gather information about what car is the most and less. First I will start with the make for Ford and
the other makes to get more information. My data will be normally distributed if 95% of the data lies
within 3 standard deviations. This therefore shows that the school does set correctly. See other
similar resources ?0.00 4.40 11 reviews Download Save for later Not quite what you were looking
for. I expected the relationship between height and weight to show me a rising trend, although it
does, the trends are very weak, probably due to external factors. A very important piece of data
retrieved from the graph was that the mean syllables per word for the Daily Star was; 1.395. The
unreliability of the data can be proven by looking at these; many values are missing and in some
cases there appears to be two people with the same name. The y on x regression line is the same as
the line of best fit. This could be sales man, who drives from one state to another. I will start with
the Year 9 male and female heights. Although neither graph has a strong correlation, the relationship
between weight and height for males is notably stronger than that of the females’ and shows a weak
positive correlation. As I did not collect the statistics myself, I am left unaware as to whether or not
they are reliable. The tallest male is 1.83M and the tallest female is 1.72M, demonstrating the fact
that males do eventually grow taller than females. In this coursework I describe a statistical activity
based on the estimatio. I am hoping that they will show me for the females the height and weight are
more negatively skewed than that of the males’, showing that most of the data are smaller values,
proving females generally weigh less and are shorter than males. This means that the inter-quartile
range will be further spread. This, coupled with the use of simple, monosyllabic language shows that
they don’t seem to be aiming towards highly educated people, or even the average person but more
towards those with little sense of comprehension and those who may not fully understand the effects
that politics and global news may have on their own lives. I will also calculate Spearman’s rank
correlation coefficient, which will allow me to discover easily the strength of correlation within the
data, and whether the correlation is positive or negative, or if there is any correlation whatsoever.
Every person has used the same facilities, books and material and the teachers have all been taught
using the same course. I will ignore these rows, as they may be genuine errors, to increase the
precision and accuracy of my investigation. The third and fourth row in the group of male heights
show a frequency of 0, which has an effect on the S-shape of the curve on my graph, and possibly
having an effect on the lower quartile. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel
It's good to leave some feedback. It may be wise to evaluate the validity and reliability of the
information by critically evaluating how the information was gathered, analysed and presented. So I
was right, when boys don’t have girls to look at the work is better. You can also tell clearly where the
4 bands are except the second band are half in the first cluster and half in the second. To select the
random people I filtered the data in excel by selecting first the males from every set, and then the
females. This shows that my prediction was correct and as there are hardly any cars with a very high
mileage and there are only a few smaller mileages.
Looking at the same pieces of data for the females, we can work out that the range is in fact 5KG
less than that of the males. This is because it uses more shorter words than the tabloid. To further, the
investigation I would compare the results of younger children to see if that had an effect on the
correlation. The more calculations used will, in my opinion, enhance the reliability and understanding
of the investigation and results, I will calculate the distribution, standard deviation and variance. I
will be investigating the relationship between height and weight and how these statistics differ
between females and males. The box represents the middle 50% of the data sample- half of all cases
are contained within it. Bundle GCSE Maths Topic Questions Bundle This bundle contains 6
question packs, covering each key topic in the maths GCSE. After collecting my data, I found that my
data isn’t biased as the teachers ended up choosing the pupils randomly. It will also ensure better
coverage of the population than simple random sampling, although it will be more complex to
organise and analyse results. Where as the majority of boys come with normal and below average
results and make a better improvement than the Girls. This has been done in the tables above, and
the outliers have been highlighted. I decided to do coursework on Key Stage 2 and Key Stage 3
SATs results because I thought that it would be quiet interesting finding out who achieves the better
results. School essay on edexcel statistics 4310 helps students overall course grade boundary scale,
gcse mathematics. I will be selecting ever 2 nd record working from the top of my spreadsheet then
going downwards, until I have 50 pieces of data. I wanted to see if they are right if not I will be able
to prove them wrong. The median for the male set of data is 165, and for the female set of data it is
163. For stratified random sampling, I could have used a field such as gender or Year to split the
overall data into groups, and selected the same amount of records from each group. First I will start
with the make for Ford and the other makes to get more information. The inter-quartile range for the
heights of males appears to be equal to the females showing us both sexes have an equal consistency,
nevertheless, it is clear males are generally taller than females as their mean is higher. Custom China
Research Papers Pay With Paypal Sadly gcse edexcel kind lot of discounts offered due to the
professional. This means that the inter-quartile range will be further spread. That is the reason why
boys by this time have a better average than the girls. Set 5 boys did not do the same exam so these
boys will not be sampled. This shows that the Year 11 boy’s have a wider range of interests and are
more open to new things, this makes them more mature than they where in Year 7. The actual lines
are at the back of my project: I got this trial data by doing the experiment: Straight Line (mm) Non
Straight Line (mm) st Practice (mm) 2nd Practice (mm) 3rd Practice (mm) Non Straight Line After
Practice (mm) 260 300 300 450 800 69 355 400 330 450 000 323 280 400 250 575 950 260 350 400
450 650 900 265 300 350 450 500 999 323 280 320 60 513 967 76 222 322 337 489 923 252 284
302 327 473 949 227 280 304 402 427 761 211 400 380 250 360 300 300 245 345 200 343 777 299
210 280. I am going to calculate the spearman’s rank correlation to specifically see how much of a
negative correlation there is. I expected the relationship between height and weight to show me a
rising trend, although it does, the trends are very weak, probably due to external factors. With these
results I will calculate the Product Moment Correlation Coefficient of the data to determine if there is
a correlation, and whether the correlation is significant. As the statistics provided have not been
collected by myself and are therefore a form of secondary data, they may be seen as unreliable. I got
the results gain by taking away the KS2 results average with the KS3.