Further Math 2 of 2
Further Math 2 of 2
❑ ❑
f (x ¿¿❑)=3❑ + 5❑ −5 x−2 ¿
❑
f ' (x ¿¿❑)=9❑ +10❑❑−5 ¿
f (x ¿¿❑)
x n+1=x n − ¿
f ' (x ¿¿❑), n=0 , 1, 2 , … , n+1 ¿
( ¿n )
❑n+1=❑n−f ¿
f ' (¿n )¿
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5 ❑❑ −5 x−2
❑n+1=❑n− ❑
9❑❑ +10 ❑❑−5
For x=−2 ,
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=0 ,❑❑=❑n − ❑ =−2.363636
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=1 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−2.277552
9❑❑ +10 ❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=2 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−2.271276
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=3 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−2.271244
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=4 ,❑❑ =❑n− ❑ =−2.271244
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=5 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−2.271244
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3 ❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=6 ,❑❑=❑n − ❑ =−2.271244
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
The root x is -2.271244.
For x=0 ,
1
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=0 ,❑❑=❑n − ❑ =−0.400000
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=1 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−0.319577
9❑❑ +10 ❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=2 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−0.318118
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=3 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−0.318117
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=4 ,❑❑ =❑n− ❑ =−0.318117
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=5 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =−0.318117
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
The root x is −0.318117.
For x=1 ,
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=0 ,❑❑=❑n − ❑ =0.928571
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=1 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =0.922732
9❑❑ +10 ❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=2 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =0.922694
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=3 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =0.922694
9❑❑ +10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ + 5❑❑ −5 x −2
n=4 ,❑❑ =❑n− ❑ =0.922694
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
❑ ❑
3❑❑ +5❑❑ −5 x−2
n=5 ,❑❑=❑n− ❑ =0.922694
9❑❑ + 10❑❑−5
The root x is 0.922694 .
2
WL 3 2
y= (2 x −3 x +5 x−1)
EI
Since y is deflection so , y is Zero .
WL
( 2 x 3 −3 x 2 +5 x−1 )=0
EI
f ( x )=−1
f ( 1 ) =2−3+5−1=3
Since , f ( 0 ) . f (1 )< 0
Choose , x l=0 ,∧xu =1
x l+ xu 0+1
x m= = =0.5
2 2
f ( x l ) =f ( 0 )=−1
¿ 0.25−0.75+0.25−1=1
x l+ xu 0+0.5
x m= = =0.25
2 2
f ( x l ) =f ( 0 )=−1
3 2
f ( x m ) =f ( 0.25 )=2 ( 0.25 ) −3 ( 0.25 ) +5 ( 0.25 )−1=0.09345
x l+ xu 0+0.25
x m= = =0.125
2 2
f ( x l ) =f ( 0 )=−1
3
f ( x m ) =f ( 0.125 )=2 ( 0.125 )3−3 ( 0.125 )2+5 ( 0.125 )−1=−0.418
x l+ xu 0.125+0.25
x m= = =0.1875
2 2
f ( x l ) =f ( 0.125 )=−0.418
3 2
f ( x m ) =f ( 0.1875 )=2 ( 0.1875 ) −3 ( 0.1875 ) +5 ( 0.1875 )−1=−0.155
x l+ xu 0.1875+0.25
x m= = =0.21875
2 2
th
After 5 iteration ,the root x approximatrly equals ¿ 0.21875.
x
y=30 cash( )
30
dy
dx
=30 sinh ( )
x 1
.
30 30
¿ sinh ( )
x
30
aqswedrftgedrftg ¿ a=−30 ¿ b=30
√
30
The length of the curve= ∫ 1+
−30
( )
dy 2
dx
dx
4
√
f ( x )= 1+sinh 2
x
30
√
¿ cosh 2
x
30
( ∴ 1+ sinh2=cosh 2 )
x
Let u=
30
1
du= dx
30
30 du=dx
If x=30∧u=1
If x=−30∧u=−1
1
¿ ∫ √ cosh ( u ) du
−1
¿ 30 ¿
¿ 30 ¿
¿ 70.5121 ( Correct ¿4 significant figures )
√
30
x
∫ 1+ sin
2
30
dx=8 intervals .
−30
b−a 30−( 30 )
Width of intervals , d= = =7.5
n 2
√
x x
y=f ( x )= 1+ sin2
30
-30 1.5431
-22.5 1.2947
-15 1.1276
-7.5 1.0314
0 1
7.5 1.0314
15 1.1276
22.5 1.2947
30 1.5431
By Trapezoidal Rule ,
5
√ { }
30
x 1
( 1.5431+1.5431 ) +1.2947+1.1276+ 1.0314+1+1.0314
∫ 1+ sinh
2
30
dx ≈ 7.5 . 2
−30
+1.1276+1.2947
≈ 70.8788
By Simpson ’ s Rule ,
√ { }
30
x 1 1
∫ 1+ sinh
2
30
dx ≈ 7.5 ×
3 2
( 1.5431+ 1.5431 )+ 1.2947+1.1276+1.0314 +1+¿ 1.0314+1.1276+ 1.2947
−30
≈ 70.5135
Checking error :
Error ¿ Trapezoidal Rule ,
Error=70.8788−70.5121
¿ 0.3667
Error ¿ Simpson ’ s Rule ,
Error=70.5135−70.5121
¿ 0.0014
While both methods entail some level of error, Simpson's rule notably minimizes this
error. Graphical expression methods pose challenges in accurately representing dimensions
and interpreting results, particularly with higher numbers. In contrast, Simpson's rule emerges
as a more suitable approach, offering a lower margin of error and enhanced practical
applicability.