GNC All NPTEL
GNC All NPTEL
INTRODUCTION
Irrespective of the kind of flight vehicle, the theory behind the design and
analysis of all these tasks eventually emanates from a branch of applied math-
ematics called control theory. The application of control theory to aerospace
may be divided into four areas.
1
objectives with specified constraints.
However, it should be kept in mind that these four categories often overlap
and the boundaries between them are not very sharp. For example, consider
the aircraft velocity and its angular orientation. These are coupled and so
the guidance and control of aircraft must be considered together.
In these lecture notes we shall discuss some aspects of guidance and nav-
igation for certain specific flight vehicles. The first part of the lecture notes
(Chapters 2, 3 and 4) is devoted to radars. Radar is perhaps the most vital
equipment used for gathering information required for guidance and naviga-
tion of flight vehicles. For example, a surface-to-air missile requires informa-
tion about the target aircraft’s position and velocity. This is done by a radar,
either ground-based or air-borne ( i.e., carried by the missile itself), which
gathers the data required to obtain this information. This data is processed
in a computer and the result is then fed into the guidance computer.
2
missiles, various guidance laws, and their performance in different scenarios.
Chapter 10 deals with the time response of first order, second order and
higher order linear time-invariant systems.
Chapter 16 is the final chapter that briefly touches upon the basic notions
of the modern approach to control systems using state variables.
3
Chapter 2
PRINCIPLES OF RADARS
2.1 Introduction
• A transmitting antenna.
• A receiving antenna
4
The transmitting antenna emits electromagnetic radiation, a portion of
which is reflected back by the target. The receiving antenna receives this
reflected energy and delivers it to the receiver. The receiver processes this
energy to detect the presence of the target and to extract its location, relative
velocity, and other information. The energy emitted by the radar is usually
in the form of a train of narrow, rectangular-shaped pulses. This is called
a radar waveform(see Fig.2.1) of course, there could be other kinds of radar
waveforms too.
5
This figure should be understood to mean that a pulse of electromagnetic
energy is being transmitted every t0 seconds. It also means that the frequency
of transmission (that is, the number of pulses per second) is given by
1
fp = (2.1)
t0
For example, if a pulse is sent every 0.1 seconds then it also means 10
pulses are being sent every one second, and so fp =1/0.1=10. Consider a
pulse of energy being sent at a given instant in time. It travels to the target
at a speed of c meters/sec, hits the target, and is reflected back at the same
speed. The reflected energy is received at the radar T R seconds after sending
the pulse(see Fig.2.2).
cTR
R= (2.2)
2
6
Figure 2.2: Transmitted and received pulses
in which case the reflection of the first pulse is always received before the
second pulse is transmitted. Thus, the maximum range or distance of the
target which does not cause any ambiguity is denoted by Runamb and is given
by,
ct0 c
Runamb = = (2.3)
2 2fp
7
Figure 2.3: (a) No ambiguity (b) ambiguity in range measurement
target is beyond this distance then the reflection of a pulse is received after the
next pulse has been transmitted. This is known as the second-time-around echoes
effect.
ANSWERS The pulse repetition frequency fp = 1000 Hz. (a) The time
duration between pulses is given by
8
1 1
t0 = = = 0.001sec = 1msec (2.4)
fp 1000
(c) A second-time-around echo occurs only when the distance of the object
is more than the maximum unambiguous range of the radar. Also remember
that the Runamb is that distance of an object for which the echo comes back
exactly t0 seconds after being transmitted. Hence,
Since the distance of the object is much less than Runamb , there is no
second-time-around echo.
(1) However simple a formula might be, do not just write it down from
memory, substitute the appropriate values, and get the answer. This way no
doubt you will get the correct answer, but it will not help to improve your
understanding of the physics behind the formula. A better way is to derive
the formula yourself through logical reasoning, before applying it. This way
9
you need not memorize formulas at all. You can derive them yourself in a
few moments.
(2) Be careful about the units you use. Regardless of the units used in the
problem statement, first convert the given values to some standard system
of units (e.g., msec to sec, km to m, etc.) and then substitute them in the
formula. Always mention the units for any numerical value you write.
(3) Remember and apply the above two comments while solving the ex-
ercises given in these lecture notes!
Pt
Pd = (2.7)
4πR2
10
Figure 2.4: Power density at distance R from the radar
Pt G
Pd = Pd G = (2.8)
4πR2
11
intercepted by the target is defined as the radar cross-section of the target.
It is denoted by σ and has the unit of area. Note that the radar cross-section
is the characteristic of a particular target and is a measure of its size as seen
by the radar. Thus, the amount of power intercepted by the target at a
distance R from the radar is,
Pt Gσ
P = Pd σ = (2.9)
4πR2
Now we assume that this power p gets radiated in all directions, and
therefore, using the same argument, the power density of the reflected signal
at the receiving antenna is given by
P P t Gσ
Pdr = 2
= (2.10)
4πR (4πR2 )2
The radar antenna now captures a portion of this reflected power. How
much of this power is actually captured depends on what is known as the
effective area of the receiving antenna. This is denoted by Ae and has the
unit of area. It is also known as the antenna effective aperture. The power
Pr received by the radar is,
Pt GσAe Pt GσAe
Pr = Pdr Ae = 2 = (2.11)
(4πR2 ) 2 (4π)2 R4
12
The radar receiver must be capable of detecting the power received. Sup-
pose the radar receiver can detect only those signals which are greater than
a value Smin (known as the minimum detectable signal ), then the maximum
range of the radar can be obtained from
Pt GAe σ
Smin = (2.12)
(4π)2 Rmax
4
From which,
14
Pt GAe σ
Rmax = (2.13)
(4π)2 Smin
This is the fundamental form of the radar equation. Note that the two
important antenna parameters used here are the antenna gain G and the
effective antenna aperture Ae .
Many radars use the same antenna for both transmission and reception.
In such cases, from antenna theory, the relationship between the antenna
gain and the receiving effective area of an antenna is given as,
4πAe
G= (2.14)
λ2
where, λ is the wavelength of the transmitted energy. Substituting this
relation in (2.13), we obtain another form of the radar equation.
14
Pt A2e σ
Rmax = (2.15)
4πλ2 Smin
Gλ2
Ae = (2.16)
4π
13
and obtain the radar equation as,
14
Pt G2 λ2 σ
Rmax = (2.17)
(4π)3 Smin
EXAMPLE 2.2
(b) If this radar now employs a lossless isotropic antenna with a gain of
5000 and the target has a radar cross-section of 1.2 m2, then what is the
power density of the echo signal at the receiver?
(c) If the minimum detectable signal of the radar is 10−8 MW and the
wavelength of the transmitted energy is 0.02 m, then what is the maximum
range at which the radar can detect targets of the kind mentioned in (b)?
(e) Suppose, due to some modifications made in the radar system com-
ponents, the antenna gain is doubled while keeping the antenna effective
14
aperture constant. Find the new radar range.
(f) What is the new radar range if the antenna gain doubles while λ
remains constant?
AN SW ER
Pt 100 × 106
= Pd = = (2.18)
4πR2 4π × (50 × 103)2
This power is now reflected back to the receiving antenna. Hence, the
power density of the echo signal at a the receiver
15
P 19.098
= Pdr = = = 6.079 × 10−10 W/m2 . (2.22)
4πR 2 4π × (50 × 103)2
1/4 1/4
P t G2 λ 2 σ 100 × 106 × (5000)2 × (0.02)2 × 1.2
Rmax = = (2.23)
(4π)3 Smin (4π)3 × 10−11
(e) Let the new antenna gain be G’ = 2G, and the corresponding wave-
length be λ .The new radar range Rmax
can be found by using either (2.10),).
If we use (2.13) then we get,
1/4
Rmax G
= = 21/4 = 1.1892. (2.26)
Rmax G
So,
16
If we use (2.15) then we get,
2 1/4
Rmax λ
Rmax
= λ2
Rmax G2 λ2 1
= [ 2 2 ]1/4 = [22 . ]1 /4 (2.28)
Rmax Gλ 2
Rmax G2
= [ 2 ]1/4 = (22)1/4 = 1.414 (2.29)
Rmax G
Hence,
Rmax = 1.414 × Rmax = 1.414 × 88.1836 = 124.7Km (2.30)
Note that exactly the same result can be obtained by using either (2.13)
or (2.15).
It should be understood that the actual radar range is much smaller than
the Rmax obtained from the radar equation. The reason is that the above
simplified equations do not take into account a number of important factors
which reduce the range of operation. These will be dealt with later.
17
Keywords. Noise, Signal-to-noise ratio, PPI, Pulse radar
The block diagram given below (Fig. 2.5) shows the main components of
pulse radar and their operation. The transmitter may be an oscillator, such
as a magnetron, which is pulsed (turned on and off) by the modulator to gen-
erate a repetitive train of pulses of the kind shown in Fig.2.1. The waveform
generated by the transmitter travels along a transmission line to the antenna,
which is generally used for both transmitting and receiving. The duplexer
consists of two devices, one known as TR (Transmit-Receive) and the other
as ATR (Anti-Transmit-Receive). The TR protects the delicate circuits of
the receiver from the high power of the transmitter during transmission and
the ATR channels the returned echo signal to the receiver, and not to the
transmitter, during reception. The first stage of the receiver is a low-noise
RF (radio frequency) amplifier. The mixer and the local oscillator convert
the RF signal to an IF (intermediate frequency) signal. This signal is passed
through an IF amplifier which is designed to maximize the signal-to-noise
ratio at its output. The pulse modulation of the echo signal is extracted
by the detector and amplified by the video amplifier to a level at which the
signal can be properly displayed on a CRT (Cathode Ray Tube). Timing
signals are also supplied for range reference. Angle information is obtained
from the pointing direction of the antenna.
The most common form of the CRT display is the PPI (Plan Position
Indicator), which maps (in polar coordinates) the location of the target in
azimuth and range. This is an intensity-modulated display in which the
amplitude of the receiver output modulates the electron-beam intensity as
the electron beam is made to sweep outward from the center of the tube.
The beam rotates in angle in response to the antenna position.
18
Figure 2.5: Block diagram of a pulse radar
Another form of display is the A-scope display, which plots target am-
plitude vs. range, for some fixed direction. This is a deflection-modulated
display. It is more suited for tracking radar application than for surveillance
radars.
The block diagram in Fig.2.5 is a simplified version which omits many im-
19
portant details like devices which automatically compensate the receiver for
changes in frequency (AFC - Automatic Frequency Controller), gain (AGC -
Automatic Gain Controller), receiver circuits for reducing interference from
other radars and from unwanted signals, rotary joints in the transmission
lines to allow movement of the antenna, circuitry for discriminating between
moving targets and unwanted stationary objects, and pulse compression for
achieving the resolution benefits of a short pulse but with the energy of a
large pulse. Similarly, there are many other devices, used according to re-
quirement, which have not been discussed here.
On the sea : Navigation aid and safety device to locate buoys, shore lines,
other ships, and for observation of aircraft.
20
In space : Guidance of spacecraft; remote sensing of land and sea.
Space : Rendezvous and docking; landing on the moon and other planets;
detection and tracking of satellites.
In Section 2.2 we had derived the maximum range Rmax (in meters) of a
radar as,
1/4
Pt GAe σ
Rmax = (2.31)
(4π)2 Smin
21
G = Antenna gain,
All the above parameters, except σ, are to some extent under the control
of the radar designer.
In practice, the simple radar equation does not predict the range perfor-
mance of actual radar equipments to a satisfactory degree of accuracy. In
many cases the actual range might be half of that predicted by the above
equation. Some of the major reasons for this are the following:
• Failure of the equation to explicitly include various losses that can occur
throughout the system.
Both Smin and σ are statistical in nature and must be expressed as such
in statistical terms. other statistical factors which affect radar performance
are meteorological conditions along the propagation path and performance
of the radar operator, if one is employed.
22
2.7 Minimum Detectable Signal
The ability of a radar receiver to detect a weak echo signal is limited by the
noise energy occupying the portion of the frequency spectrum which is also
occupied by the signal energy. The weakest signal the receiver can detect
is Smin (minimum detectable signal). But the specification of the minimum
detectable signal is usually difficult because of the presence of noise and be-
cause the criterion for deciding whether a target is present or not may not
be too well-defined.
Here the signal at A (see Fig.2.6) crosses the threshold level and indicates
the presence of a target. Obviously, too high a threshold level might cause a
signal to be missed and too low a threshold level might produce spurious sig-
nals due to noise. It ought to be noted that noise sometimes has a beneficial
effect since it enhances some weak signals so that they cross the threshold
(as in the case of the signal at B in Fig.2.6).
The harmful effect of noise arises from the fact that the threshold level
has to be raised to avoid spurious signals, thus causing nondetection of signal
which might have been otherwise detected. The signal at C (Fig.2.6) illus-
trates this point. If the threshold level had been lower the receiver would
have detected the signal.
23
• Probability of a false alarm.
2.8 Noise
24
and is given by
1
N
Tf a = lim ( ) Tk (2.32)
N →∞ N
k=1
N
tk < tk >av 1
Pf a = Nk=1 = = (2.33)
k=1 Tk < Tk >av Tf a B
EXAMPLE 2.3 : The noise profile in a threshold detector, when displayed
on an A-scope, reveals the following information recorded over a period of
time from 0 to 90 secs.
A → 2 6 12 14 17 29 35 40 48 50 62 68 73 79 86
B→ 10 9 8 12 5 6 10 3 4 8 2 11 9 13 7
where, A=time in sec at which the noise amplitude crosses the threshold with
positive slope, and B=time duration in msec for which the noise remains
above the threshold. Find the approximate value of the probability of false
alarm based on the above data.
ANSWER
25
Since the average duration of the noise pulse is approximately the recip-
rocal of the bandwidth B, which in the case of the envelope detector is BIF ,
and since
−VT2
Pf a = exp (2.36)
2ψ0
(i) the wavelength of the transmitted energy doubles while the antenna
gain become half.
(ii) the antenna effective aperture becomes half while the antenna gain
triples.
26
(iii) the antenna effective aperture doubles while the wavelength of the
transmitted energy remains constant. Find the new radar range in all the
three cases.
4. In Example 2.3 plot the probability of false alarm against the number
of samples. Can you comment on whether the number of samples considered
is adequate or not?
27
Figure 2.6: Output of a typical radar receiver on an A-scope display
28
Figure 2.7: Receiver output illustrating false alarm due to noise
29
Chapter 3
A radar detects the presence of objects and locates their position in space
by transmitting electromagnetic energy and observing the returned echo.
A pulse radar transmits a relatively short burst of electromagnetic energy,
after which the receiver is turned on to listen for the echo. The echo not
only indicates that a target is present, but the time that elapses between the
transmission of the pulse and the reception of its echo is a measure of the
distance to the target. Separation of the echo signal from the transmitted
signal is made on the basis of differences in time.
30
The received echo-signal power is considerably smaller than the transmitter
power (as low as 10−18 times the transmitter power - or sometimes even less).
Separate antennas for transmission and reception help isolate the weak echo
from the strong leakage signal, but this isolation is usually not sufficient.
A feasible technique for separating the received signal from the transmitted
signal, when there is relative motion between radar and target, is based on
recognizing the change in the echo-signal frequency caused by what is known
as the doppler effect.
It is well known in the field of optics and acoustics that if there is relative
motion between the source of a signal and the observer of the signal, along
the line joining the two, then an apparent shift in frequency will result. This
is the doppler effect and is the basis of CW (Continuous Wave) radars.
2R
n= (3.1)
λ
2R 4πR
φ= .2π = (3.2)
λ λ
When the target is in motion, both R and φ are changing. Now a change
31
Figure 3.1: The doppler effect
dφ 4π dR 4πVr
Wd = 2πfd = = . = (3.3)
dt λ dt λ
2Vr 2Vr fo
fd = = (3.4)
λ c
32
Where,
Vr = relative velocity of the target with respect to the radar along the
line-of-sight.
For a stationary radar and a moving target the relative velocity may be
written as
Vr = V cos θ (3.5)
where, V is the target speed and θ is the angle made by the target velocity
vector with the LOS. When θ = 0, the doppler frequency is a maximum.
The doppler frequency is zero when the trajectory is perpendicular to the
π
radar-target line-of-sight (that is, θ = 2
= 90o ). Also note that the doppler
frequency shift positive for an approaching target (that is, Vr is considered
to be positive) and negative for a receding target (that is, Vr is considered
to be negative).
(a) What is the doppler frequency shift recorded by the radar in aircraft
A?
(c) What should be the flight direction of aircraft B for the doppler fre-
quency shift to be zero?
33
ANSWER
34
that the frequency of the received signal is more than the frequency of the
transmitted signal.
(c) The doppler frequency shift will be zero when the relative velocity vr
is zero. This can happen when
θ = ±57.970 . (3.9)
Thus, the change in frequency between the transmitted signal and the
received signal allows the received signal to be separated from the trans-
35
mitted signal. Apart from this, the CW radar also provides a measurement
of relative velocity which may be used to distinguish moving targets from
stationary objects and clutter.
1 + Vr /c
f ∗ = f0 . (3.10)
1 − Vr /c
(4πf0 R)/c
(3.12)
(1 − Vr /c)
36
is intercepted by the target and is scattered. some of it in the direction of
the radar, where it is collected by the receiving antenna. If the target is in
motion with a velocity Vr relative to the radar, the received signal frequency
37
dyned in the detector (mixer) with a portion of the transmitted signal f0 to
produce a doppler beat note of frequency fd . However, the sign of fd is lost
in this process.
38
3.3 ISOLATION BETWEEN TRANSMITTER
AND RECEIVER
A single antenna serves the purpose of both transmission and reception in the
simple CW radar described above. Though, in principle, a single antenna is
sufficient as the necessary isolation is obtained by the separation in frequency
(as a result of doppler effect), in practice there is considerable transmitter
leakage. But this leakage is beneficial too since it supplies the reference fre-
quency necessary for the detection of the doppler frequency shift. Otherwise
a sample of the transmitted signal must be made available at the receiver.
However, there are two reasons why the amount of transmitter leakage power
should be kept at a low value.
• The maximum power the receiver input circuitry can withstand, with-
out being physically damaged or having its sensitivity reduced, is quite
low.
• The transmitter noise which enters the receiver from the transmitter
reduces receiver sensitivity.
39
the minimum detectable signal were 10−13 watt, the transmitter noise must
be at least 110 dB below the transmitted carrier.
Et = Eo cos wo t
Er = K1 E0 cos [(wo + wd )t + φ]
40
Figure 3.3: Transmitted and received signal frequency
The sign of the doppler frequency, and therefore the direction of target
motion, may be found by splitting the received signal into two channels as
shown in Fig.3.4.
EA = K2 E0 cos(±wd t + φ)
41
Figure 3.4: Determination of the sign of the Doppler frequency
π
The channel B has 2
phase delay introduced in the reference signal. The
output of the channel B mixer is,
π
EB = K2 E0 cos(±wd t + φ + ) (3.13)
2
If the target is approaching (positive doppler),the outputs from the two chan-
nels are,
EA = K2 E0 cos(wd t + φ) (3.14)
π
EB = K2 E0 cos(wd t + φ + ) (3.15)
2
on the other hand, if the target is receding (negative doppler),
42
π
EB (−) = K2 E0 cos(wd t + φ + ) (3.17)
2
the sign of wd and the direction of the target’s motion may be determined
according to whether the output of channel B leads or lags the output of
channel A. One method of determining the relative phase relationship be-
tween the two channels is to apply the outputs of the two channels to a
synchronous two-phase motor. The direction of the motor’s rotation is an
indication of the direction of the target’s motion.
43
Keywords. CW radars, FM-CW radars
The chief use of the simple unmodulated CW radar is for the measurement
of the relative velocity of a moving target.
Among its disadvantages is the fact that the amplitude of the signal that
can be transmitted by a CW radar is dependent on the isolation that can be
achieved between the transmitter and the receiver since the transmitter noise
that finds its way into the receiver limits the receiver sensitivity. This limits
the maximum range of the radar. The pulse radar has no similar limitations
to its maximum range because the transmitter is not operative when the
receiver is turned on.
44
3.6 FREQUENCY MODULATED CW RADAR
(FM-CW)
From the principle of CW radars we see that the Doppler frequency shift can
be used to determine the presence of a moving target and its relative velocity
along the LOS. In chapter 2 we had mentioned that one of the primary
functions of a radar is to measure the range to an object. This does not
appear to be possible in a CW radar since we have no way of determining
the time after which a particular part of the transmitted waveform comes
back in the form of an echo. This is so since it is impossible to distinguish
one part of a continuous signal waveform from another. In pulse radars
there is considerable gap between one pulse and the next and so it was easy
to associate or identify a pulse with its echo. Recall that even there this
identification became difficult when the gap between pulses was small (or
the target was at a large distance), giving rise to second-time-around echoes.
In CW radars an exactly similar effect, though of a more serious nature,
occurs thus making it impossible to identify a part of and echo waveform
with its original transmitted waveform. This is the reason why an ordinary
radar is incapable of measuring range to an object.
45
Figure 3.5: Linear frequency modulation in FM-CW radars
time. Suppose it increases linearly with time, then we will have a variation
as shown in Fig 3.5.
46
mitted signal frequency and the currently received signal is a measure of the
to-and-fro transit time of the transmitted signal.
fb = fr = f 0 T = f 0 2R
c
2R
where, R is the distance to the target and so T = c
. From the above we
get
fb c
R= (3.18)
2f o
The above analysis shows that measurement of fb and the knowledge the
frequency modulation rate is sufficient to obtain the required range informa-
tion.
The obvious flaw in the above scheme is that the transmitted frequency
cannot go on increasing indefinitely. A solution is to use a periodic change in
the frequency. A particular case is the triangular-frequency modulation waveform.
This is shown in Fig. 3.6 below where both the frequency modulation scheme
and the resulting beat frequency curve is given. Note that the sign of the
beat frequency is not preserved and hence it always appears as a positive
frequency. Here, the beat frequency is given by fr at all points except in
the neighbourhood of the peaks of the transmitted signal. Note that the
frequency of the triangular modulation waveform is fm and hence its time
1
period is given by fm
. This is shown in the figure. Thus we have,
2R 0 2R f /2 4Rfm f
fr = f = . = (3.19)
c c 1/(4fm ) c
47
Figure 3.6: Triangular frequency modulation in FM-CW radars
cfr c
R= = fr = kfr (3.20)
4fm f 4fm f
48
Figure 3.7: Block diagram of a FM-CW radar
will now be
fb = |fr ± fd |
This will become clearer from the figures given below. First consider an
approaching target. The corresponding waveforms are shown in Fig.3.8. The
figure is self-explanatory. The only feature to note here is that the beat
frequency is lower during the increasing portion of the transmitted frequency
and higher during the decreasing portion of the transmitted frequency. Now
consider the case for receding targets. This is shown in Fig.3.9. Note that
here the beat frequency during the increasing portion of the transmitted
frequency is higher than during the decreasing portion. However, essentially
49
Figure 3.8: Approaching target
there is no distinction between the two beat frequency curves shown in Fig.3.8
and 3.9, if they are considered in isolation. The direction of movement of
the target (i.e., wheter it is approaching or receding)has to be determined by
other means.
The words ’up’ and ’down’ refer to the increasing and decreasing portions
of the transmitted frequency i.e., when the frequency is increasing (or going
’up’)or decreasing (or going ’down’)with time. For receding targets, we have,
50
Figure 3.9: Receding target
fb (up) = fr + fd ,
fb (down) = |fr − fd |
The difference between them will yield the doppler frequency as (if fr ≥ fd )
51
fd = (1/2)|[fb (up) − fb (down)]|
Using fr in (3.18) yields the range and using fd we can find the target relative
velocity along the LOS.
ANSWERS
Refer to Fig 3.6 for explanation of the terms used below. The average
52
transmission frequency =f=100 MHz = 100x106 Hz. The peak-to peak fre-
quency variation = Δ f = 20 KHz = 20x103 Hz. The rate of triangular
frequency modulation = fm = 20 Hz. Then the slope of the variation in
frequency, given by Å, is
f /2 20 × 103 /2
Å = = = 8 × 105 Hz/Sec (3.21)
1/(4fm ) 1/(4 × 20)
From the figure we see that the target is a receding one with relative
velocity
From Fig 3.9 the beat frequency during the increasing and decreasing por-
tions of the transmitted frequency are
53
PROBLEMS AND EXERCISES
1. Derive Eqn (3.7) from Eqn (3.6) under suitable assumptions and obtain
the doppler frequency shift as given in Eqn (3.4).
Is there a direction of flight which the target can employ so that it escapes
detection by both the radars at the instant shown in the figure?
54
Figure 3.10: sample figures example
and a moving target at point B as shown in the figure given below. Plot θ
vs. fd on a graph sheet as θ varies from, 0 to 1800 in steps of 150 . (b) Let
the initial value of θ be 450 . Plot fd vs. time in seconds as time varies from
0 to 10 seconds in steps of 2 seconds.
55
in the figure. Sketch the echo waveform from a stationary target and from a
receding target. Sketch the beat frequency waveform for both cases.
56
Chapter 4
4.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter we studied how doppler frequency shift can be used
in continuous wave radars to determine relative velocity of a moving target or
distinguish moving targets from stationary targets. In this chapter we shall
show that the doppler frequency shift produced by a moving target may also
be used in a pulse radar to determine the relative velocity of a target or
to separate desired signals from moving targets and undesired signals from
stationary objects (clutter).
57
Target Indicators) and Pulse Doppler Radars. The physical principle of
both these radars are the same but they differ in their mode of operation.
For instance the MTI radar operates on low pulse repetition frequencies thus
causing ambiguous Doppler measurements (blind speeds) but unambiguous
range measurements (no second-time-around echoes). On the other hand the
pulse doppler radar operates on high pulse repetition. frequency thus causing
unambiguous doppler measurements (no blind speeds) but ambiguous range
measurements (second-time-around echoes). The meaning of these terms will
become clear later when we describe the actual operational principles of these
radars.
58
Vosc = A1 sin(2πft t)
Vref = A2 sin(2πft t)
4πft R0
Vecho = A3 sin 2π(ft ± fd )t − c
where,
t = time
c = velocity of propagation.
The reference signal and the target echo signal are heterodyned in the
mixer stage. The difference frequency component is
4πft R0
Vdif f = A4 sin 2πfd t − (4.1)
c
59
For stationary targets the doppler frequency shift fd will be zero; hence
Vdif f will not vary with time and may take on any constant value from +A4
to −A4 , including zero. But when the target is in motion relative to the
radar,fd has a value other than zero and the voltage corresponding to the
difference frequency from the mixer will vary with time. Note that all these
frequencies are with reference to the carrier waveform and has nothing to do
with the pulse repetition frequency.
Fig.4.3(a) shows the reflected signal from the target. The frequency of
this signal may have been changed due to the motion of the target. In
Fig.4.3(b) the difference signal is shown in the presence of a moving target
for the case when the resultant doppler frequency is such that fd > 1/t, and
in Fig. 4.3(c) for the case when fd < 1/τ, where τ is the width of one pulse.
When fd > 1/τ, fd can be easily found from the information contained in one
pulse. whereas, when fd < 1/τ many pulses will be required to extract fd .
The difference signal is the output of the mixer and is also called the video
output. If this video output is now displayed on an A-scope (amplitude vs.
time or range) in successive sweeps. Note that the amplitude of the signals
from stationary targets do not change with the number of sweeps. But the
echo signals from moving targets will change in amplitude over successive
sweeps according to Equation (4.4). When these sweeps are superposed over
each other (Fig.4.4(f)), due to the effect of persistence of vision, the moving
targets will produce signals which on the A-scope display will look like a
butterfly opening and closing its wings. This kind of signal is not good enough
for a PPI since the screen display will show bright patches for all stationary
targets and spots of fluctuating brightness for moving targets. But what we
actually require is doppler information regarding moving targets only. one
method to extract this information is to employ delay-line cancelers. In this
the current signal is delayed by one pulse time period (reciprocal of the pulse
repetition frequency) and subtracted from the signal coming next. The effect
is shown in Fig.4.5 below. Only the fluctuating signal from the moving target
60
remains and the signals from the stationary targets are cancelled out. In the
PPI, the positions of stationary targets will show dark patches and moving
targets will show spots which periodically fluctuate in brightness. However,
use of delay line cancellers cause problems of blind speeds. Note that the
signal is delayed by one pulse time period and then subtracted. Suppose the
signal from the moving target fluctuates in such a way that the signal after
this time delay is the same as the signal before this time delay. This will
happen whenever fd is a multiple of fp (the pulse repetition frequency), that
is,
fd = nfp , n = 1, 2, . . .
When this happens the resultant signal after subtraction is Zero. Thus the
radar fails to detect, or is blind to, the presence of such a moving target.
Doppler frequency shifts fd which cause this phenomenon are themselves
caused by certain specific target velocities. Substituting the expression for
doppler frequency in (4.5), we get,
nλfp nλ
vr = = , n = 1, 2, . . . (4.3)
2 2T
where, T is the pulse time period.
For a specific n this is called the n-th blind speed. Whenever the target
relative velocity with respect to the radar along the line of sight matches
with these speeds, an MTI radar fails to detect the moving target. Thus to
avoid doppler ambiguities (due to blind speeds) the first blind speed must
be larger than the maximum expected relative velocity of the target. This
61
can be achieved by either making fp large or by making λ large. So MTI
radars should operate at long wavelengths (low carrier frequencies) or high
pulse repetition frequencies, or both. But, unfortunately other constraint
prevent this kind of choice. Too low radar frequencies make the beam-width
wider and cause deterioration in angular resolution. Too high pulse repetition
frequencies cause ambiguous range measurements.
ANSWER:
c 3 × 108
= = = 3m (4.4)
ft (100 × 106 )
nλf p
vrn = (4.5)
2
62
So, the first blind speed =
1 × 3 × 200
= 300m/sec (4.6)
2
The second blind speed =
2 × 3 × 200
= 600m/sec (4.7)
2
The third blind speed =
3 × 3 × 200
= 900m/sec (4.8)
2
63
Figure 4.1: Block Diagram of (a) Simple CW Radar and (b) pulse radar
using doppler information
64
Figure 4.2: Pulse train generated from a continuous signal
65
Figure 4.3: (a) Reflected signal (b) Difference signal when fd > 1/τ (c)
Difference signal when fd < 1/τ
66
Figure 4.4: (a-e) Successive sweeps of an MTI Radar on an A-scope display
and (f) supersposition of these signals (arrows indicate moving targets)
67
Figure 4.5: (a)Basic delay line canceller block diagram (b) Effect of delay
line canceller on the signal
68
Figure 4.6: Effect of Blind speeds
69
Keywords. Command guidance, Homing guidance, LOS angle, Closing
velocity, Miss-distance, Time-to-go, Blind zone
82
Figure 5.6: Guidance phases for an air-to-air missile
The missile trajectory for SAMs is a almost the same except the initial
phase which is called the boost phase. In this phase the missile’s booster
provides the required velocity to the missile. Since this phase occurs for a
very short time during which the missile is marginally stable and has high
longitudinal acceleration, no guidance commands are given to the missile.
However, some modern missiles under development consider the incorpora-
tion of a boost phase guidance scheme to improve overall performance. Fig.
5.7 shows these phases for a SAM.
83
Figure 5.7: Guidance phases for a surface-to-air missile
84
Based on these inputs the missile flight control system takes action. Thus,
the computers and other equipment at the ground station ”command” the
missile to behave in a certain fashion. This kind of guidance is also known as
three-point guidance there are three major points of reference : the missile,
the target, and the ground station. The part of the trajectory in which the
missile is command guided is called the command phase. Usually in purely
command guided missiles there are three phases: boost phase, command
guided phase, and the terminal phase. The last phase is for a short dura-
tion in which the missile is very close to the target and hence usually does
not maneuver or uses some constant maneuver level obtained from previous
guidance commands. The reason for this is that the missile during this phase
is so close to the target that there is little time to generate new guidance
commands and consequently update the maneuver level. This kind of trajec-
tory is shown in Fig. 5.8 (a). Homing guidance scheme does not depend on
any ground station for the generation of guidance commands. This is also
called two-point guidance.
85
5.5 DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF HOM-
ING GUIDANCE
Homing guidance schemes are desirable from the point of view that they
require less control from a ground station and once launched could be more
or less autonomous in guiding themselves. These are also called ”Fire-and-
Forget” missiles. However, there are many categories of homing guidance
which invest varying degrees of autonomy to the missile. Some of these
categories are discussed below.
Active Homing
Semi-Active Homing
Passive Homing
In this system, in which the receiver, placed inside the missile, utilizes the
energy emanating from the target. It does not require a transmitter. A heat
seeking missile uses such a system. The missile contains the receiver for the
86
kind of energy that the target emanates, a signal processor, and a guidance
computer. These missiles may appear to be as autonomous as active missiles
but actually have less autonomy since they have to depend on the target to
emanate the necessary energy. If the target stops emanating this energy, the
missile stops functioning.This is shown in Fig.5.11 below.
Lateral Acceleration
This is also called as latax. This is the acceleration that needs to be ap-
plied by the missile to achieve a desired turn rate. It is called lateral acceleration
since it is usually applied in a direction close to the normal to the missile lon-
gitudinal axis or the missile velocity vector. In fact the guidance command
generated by the guidance law is usually expressed as a lateral acceleration
term. This is called the commanded latax and is fed into the lateral autopi-
lots. Since the autopilots are essentially dynamical systems with time delay,
the actual achieved latax is a time-varying quantity and is different from the
instantaneous commanded latax at any moment in time. This difference may
also occur due to saturation effect since the missile may not be able to pull
very high commanded latax.
87
instantaneous line-of-sight or LOS. This line changes in length and orienta-
tion as the engagement proceeds. The change in angular orientation is given
by its angular velocity or rate of turn and is usually expressed in units of
radians /sec. This is called the LOS rate.
Closing Velocity
This is the velocity with which the missile closes on to the target. Ob-
viously this is given by the rate at which the length of the LOS shrinks.
Hence, it is the negative of the rate of change of the LOS length. It is also
the doppler relative velocity of the target with respect to the missile along the
line-of-sight. Remember that the doppler relative velocity is positive when
the target is approaching and negative when it is receding.
Miss Distance
This is the distance of closest approach of the missile to the target. When
the missile directly hits the target.The miss distance is zero. But when the
missile passes close to the target the miss distance is non-zero. In this case
the proximity fuze detonates the warhead and the engagement comes to an
end. Obviously, the primary objective of a guidance system is to minimize the
miss-distance. Also note that the miss-distance as a non-negative quantity.
Consider fig.5.12 which shows the trajectories of a missile and a target, and
also the miss-distance. It also shows the LOS at different instants in time.
Including the LOS at the instant of closest approach. The length of this
LOS gives the miss-distance. Now, what distinguishes this LOS from all the
other LOSs? It can be easily deduced that the losing velocity at this LOS is
zero. The closing velocity of the LOS before this is positive and of the LOS
after this is negative.
Time-to-go
88
the implementation of many advanced guidance laws. Suppose we record the
trajectory data of a missile-target engagement and find that the engagement
ends with an interception at time tf (final time). Note that interception is
assumed to have taken place when either the missile directly hits the the
target or at the time of closest approach. Now, at any given instant in time
t during the engagement the time-to-go is defined as the time remaining till
interception and is given by tf − t. It is usually denoted as tgo . This value
is the actual time-to-go which is known only after the engagement is over.
But, to implement the guidance law, we need to estimate the tgo during
the engagement. There are many ways by which this can be done.One of the
ways, based on the available instantaneous information, is to use the formula,
tgo = R
(−Ṙ)
where,
tgo is the estimated time-to-go and R is the LOS length or the
distance between the target and the missile at that instant in time. This is
not a very accurate method of estimating the tgo , but for some limited cases
it is satisfactory. There are other, more accurate but complicated, ways of
finding the tgo .
Blind Zone
In a homing guidance system the seeker has to keep pointing towards the
target to track it. However, during the last part of the terminal phase the
missile could be pointing in such a direction that the seeker has to turn by a
very large angle to keep the target within its field of view. However, seeker
turn angle is subject to mechanical limitations. Hence, it may not be possible
for the seeker to turn by such a large angle. In this case the seeker loses track
of the target and cannot ”see” it any core. This is called the blind zone of
the missile. This is shown in Fig. 5.13 below. There is no information input
from the seeker during this phase and the guidance system has to depend on
previous inputs.
89
5.7 THE KINEMATIC EQUATIONS
Ṙ = VT cos(β − θ) − VM cos(α − θ)
Here, VT and VM are the target and missile velocities, and R is the dis-
tance from the missile to the target (LOS length or LOS separation). The
missile employs a lateral acceleration aM to turn the missile in an appropri-
ate direction. Note that θ̇ is the LOS rate and Ṙ is the rate of change of the
LOS separation. Also, the closing velocity VC is given by,
Vc = −Ṙ
The above equations do not form the complete set of kinematic equations.
The complete set will also consist of equations modelling the variations in
α, β, θ, VM and VT . Integrating these equations with respect to time from
some given initial conditions will give the complete trajectory of this system
of equations.
1. Collect the following data for one missile each from the SSM, SAM,
ASM and AAM categories: Name of the missile, type of missile(a short
description), country of origin, height or length, diameter, weight, range ,
90
airframe configuration, warhead, guidance system, propulsion system, speed.
Include any other data about the missile which you may find of interest.
91
Figure 5.8: Trajectories for (a) command guidance (b) Homing guidance (c)
Mixed guidance
92
Figure 5.9: Active homing guidance
93
Figure 5.10: Semi-active homing guidance
94
Figure 5.11: Passive homing guidance
95
Figure 5.12: Miss-distance
96
Figure 5.13: Blind zone in the terminal homing phase
97
Figure 5.14: Missile-target engagement geometry
98
Figure 5.15: A missile-target engagement geometry
99
Chapter 5
GUIDED MISSILES
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Guided missiles have been in the forefront of modern warfare since the second
world war. Thanks to the media blitz accompanying the Gulf war they have
almost become household words nowadays. Though it is true that guided
missiles are mainly used for destructive purposes, one cannot disregard the
fact that they are one of the most outstanding examples of the application
of scientific techniques to design, control and guide remote vehicles without
direct human intervention.
70
A guided missile is a space-traversing unmanned vehicle which carries
within itself the means for controlling its flight path.
Surface-to-Surface Missiles
These missiles are launched from some point on the surface of the earth
to another point on the surface of the earth. They could also be launched
71
from a ship. These missiles are usually employed against large and stationary
targets. The range of the missile and the type of warhead it uses depends
on the kind of targets. The target could be a small factory or a big city.
The range could be as low as a few kilometers to as high as thousands of
kilometers. Though the terminal accuracy required of the missile guidance
system is usually not much, the accuracy required for targets at long range
must be high compared to those required for short ranges. However, many
recently designed surface-to surface missiles demand very high terminal ac-
curacy. The accuracy of such missiles depends to a large extent, on the
accuracy of determining the position of the target with reference to some
standard frame.
Missiles of this kind, by the very nature of their use, are offensive missiles.
Missiles employed for long range targets are also known as strategic missiles.
Short Range, Intermediate Range, and Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles
(SRBM,IRBM,and ICBM) are some of the generic names (based on the range
performance) of these missiles. Some examples of this type of missiles are :
CSS-3 ICBM (Country of origin : China, Maximumrange : 7000 km), SS-
18 satan ICBM (CIS-formerly USSR, 12000 KM), Minuteman ICBM (USA,
12500 km), Prithvi SRBM (India, 100-250 km), Agni IRBM (India, 600-1000
km).
Surface-to-Air Missiles
Any guided missile launched from a point on the surface of the earth to
destroy a target in the air qualifies for this category. The launch point, how-
ever, could be either a ship or land. Here the targets are always in motion
and quite often have considerable maneuvering capability. The guidance sys-
tem must be accurate since the targets are usually small in size, move at high
speeds, and/or are capable of executing complicated maneuvers (e.g., fighter
aircraft, helicopters, SSMs). Thus, these missiles have support equipments
which continuously collect information about the current position and veloc-
72
ity of the target. The time available for the missile to destroy a flying target
is usually small and so the guidance system must be able to take appropriate
actions in a short period of time.
Air-to-Surface Missiles
These missiles are primarily offensive weapons but can also be considered
as defensive weapon systems depending on their actual use. Some examples
are : Gabriel MK-III (Israel, 40 km), HARM AGM-88A (USA, 25 km).
Air-to-Air Missile
Here, both the launch platform and the target are aircraft. These missiles
are perhaps the most difficult to design and build from a guidance point-of-
view. Both aircraft are at motion in high speeds. They are also capable of
high maneuverability. Targets are small and difficult to locate. The guidance
73
system has to take into account all the factors mentioned for SAMs at the
target end, and those mentioned for ASMs at the launch end. In addition,
the guidance system should be such that it should not prevent the aircraft
launching the missile from taking evasive actions for its own survival after
the missile has been launched.
These missiles can be used both as offensive and defensive weapon sys-
tems. Some examples are: Super 530 (France, 25 km), Ash AA-5 (CIS, 5-20
km), Sidewinder AIM-9 (USA, 5-15 km).
The airframe is the framework that carries the missile components. The
guidance and fuze sections are located at the forward end of the airframe.
The Radome covers the guidance-section seeker head to protect it from aero-
dynamic forces. The warhead section is located behind the guidance section
and in front of the propulsion section. The flight control section is positioned
wherever the control surfaces are located. If a data link is required (as in
command guided missiles, guided from the ground), the antenna and the
receiver are located at the rear end of missile. Some of these subsystems are
described below.
Airframe
74
Figure 5.1: Tactical missile components
Flight Control
75
Figure 5.2: Types of Airframes
ling the airframe motions using roll, pitch, and yaw autopilots. These are
automatic feedback control systems. The last two (pitch and yaw) are also
called lateral autopilots and are almost identical.
Guidance
76
accomplish this task the guidance system needs to perform four functions :
(1) Seeker stabilization (2) Target acquisition (3) Tracking, and (4) Steering
signal generation. A simplified block diagram is shown in Fig. 5.3.
The sensor that receives the target signal return is normall mounted in
some type of gimbal system that is attached to the missile body. In order
for the sensor to function properly it must be decoupled from the missile
body motions. This is accomplished through the seeker head stabilization
loop. Sensor motion is sensed with a rate gyroscope attached to the sensor
77
platform. Signal from the rate gyroscope is used to generate the feedback
which compensates for the body motions.
The output of the sensor is fed into the signal processor which processes
the signal and provides the input to the tracking system which does the job
of keeping the sensor boresight (or central axis ) on the target in order to
maintain target track and generate steering signals. The steering commands
are generated through guidance laws which use information (available from
the signal processor) such as line-of-sight (LOS) rate, closing velocity, etc.
These guidance laws will be discussed in detail in the next chapter. The
steering commands generated by the guidance system are fed to the lateral
autopilots.
Fuze
The function of the fuze is to detect the target’s presence in the missile’s
vicinity and detonate the warhead. Tactical missiles usually have contact
and proximity fuzes. The contact fuze becomes operative when the missile
makes physical contact with the target. The proximity fuze is designed to
detect the target when the missile passes close to the target without direct
contact.
The fuze is designed to react to signal returns from targets within the
lethal range of the warhead. Signal returns from targets beyond a specified
range are rejected.
Other kinds of modern proximity fuzes are laser fuzes. This provides very
accurate operation and is immune to most conventional electronic counter-
78
Figure 5.4: Typical active RF fuze antenna pattern
There are two laser beam patterns, one conical and the other circular.
When the target hits the conical beam pattern at point A, the fuze system is
alerted to the presence of a target and the detonation takes place when the
target hits the circular beam pattern at point B. Other strategies to detonate
the warhead may also be designed based on the target’s interception of the
two beam patterns. The essential idea is to ensure that the warhead detonates
at the center of the target.
79
Figure 5.5: Laser-fuze dual beam pattern
Propulsion
The propulsion system of the missile provides the required initial thrust
to the missile to enable it to fly with sufficient velocity during the subse-
quent engagement period with the target. There are two phases in missile
propulsion : boost and sustain.During boost the propulsion system provides
a high level of missile acceleration over a relatively short period of time(1-
15 secs). The purpose of sustain propulsion is to maintain the missile at
a desired velocity for the majority of the remaining missile flight. Various
80
combinations of boost and sustain propulsion (like all-boost, boost-sustain,
all sustain) may be used in different missile systems. However, in principle,
the all-sustain configuration is never used, since it usually requires a very
short boost phase. An example is the air-to-air missile which does not have
a booster motor but a short boost is provided by the sustainer motor itself.
The booster motor is typically a solid propellant motor while the sustainer
motor could either be a solid propellant one or a jet engine. Some modern
missiles nowdays use integrated rocket-ramjet propulsion.
Warhead
The warhead is the payload of the missile and consists of a shell, explo-
sives, and a detonator. The weight of the warhead depends on the size of
the missile. The fuze pulse activated the detonator which in triggers the
explosive. The shell breaks into numerous fragments which are propelled
outward in a 60-90 degrees spread and achieves target kill by penetrating
target components. Apart from the basic fragmentation type the other kinds
of warheads are: continuous-rod warhead, annular blast fragmentation war-
head, selectively aimable warhead.
81
Chapter 6
100
active area of research for the past five decades. These guidance laws were
first designed during the second world war and were subsequently refined.
We may classify these guidance laws as classical and modern guidance laws.
In the classical guidance laws we have line-of-sight (LOS)guidance, pursuit
guidance and its variants, proportional navigation and its variants. The
modern guidance laws are derived from optimal control theory, differential
games, singular perturbation theory, and reachable set theory. Of these, the
proportional navigation (PN) guidance laws form the boundary between the
classical and the modern approach.
The basic PN law is a classical guidance law whereas many of its variants
are recent extensions and should rightfully be treated as modern guidance
laws. In these lecture notes we shall discuss the LOS, pursuit, PN and optimal
control guidance laws only.
The classical guidance laws are those which have been employed in mis-
siles for decades and are designed using rather simple ideas. A majority of
available guided missiles use these guidance laws or their refinements. They
have the advantage of easy mechanization, standard equipments and minimal
information requirement. Their disadvantage lies in the fact that their accu-
racy suffers against maneuvering and intelligent targets. This is especially of
importance for SAMs and AAMs.
101
the LOS should be equal to the LOS velocity at that point, that is,
Vp = Rθ̇ (6.1)
(1) Their performance degrades against high speed and maneuvering tar-
gets.
(2) A major disadvantage is that the commanded latax required for ap-
proaching targets (even for a non-maneuvering one)becomes very high to-
wards the end. Since the missile achieved latax has an upper limit, the
saturation effect causes miss-distance. This is shown in Fig 6.3 below.
102
Figure 6.1: LOS guidance engagement geometry
(3) Since these guidance laws, by the very nature of their mechanization,
depend completely, on information received from ground station, they do not
have the ”fire-and forget” capability of active homing guidance.
The basic idea here is to keep the missile pointed towards the target.
Whenever, there is a deviation a latax command is applied to annul the
deviation. There are two kinds of pursuit guidance: (1) Attitude Pursuit,
in which the missile longitudinal axis is kept pointed at the target; and (2)
Velocity pursuit in which the missile’s velocity vector is kept pointing at the
target. These two are different since there is usually a non-zero angle-of-
attack, which is the angle between the missile velocity vector and the missile
103
Figure 6.2: Beam rider guidance
104
Figure 6.3: LOS guidance against approaching target
105
Figure 6.4: Velocity pursuit guidance against an approaching target
106
other. Translated to the language of LOS rate and closing velocity, it implies
that the LOS rate is zero and the closing velocity is positive. PN law uses
the idea that if the LOS rate at any time is non-zero then the guidance
command applied should be such that it annuls the LOS rate. In fact the
latax generated is made proportional to the LOS rate and the closing velocity.
Thus the commanded latax according to PN law is,
am α θ̇
am = N Vc θ̇
where, N is called the navigation constant and usually lies between 3 and 5.
Vc = Ṙ is the LOS rate. Usually the commanded latax is applied normal to
the missile velocity vector. But there are many variations of the PN law in
which the latax could be applied in directions different from the normal to
the missile velocity vector.
Note that for most engagements between missile and target the initial
and subsequent closing velocity remains positive till the distance of closest
approach occurs. Hence, the direction in which the latax is applied is given
by the direction of rotation of the LOS. This is shown in Fig. 6.5 below. In
fact, when the LOS rate rotates in the clockwise or anti-clockwise direction
the latax applied is such that the missile velocity vector also rotates in the
same direction.
This is logical for the following reason: Consider that the LOS is ro-
tating in the anti-clockwise direction. It implies that the target velocity
component normal to the LOS. By turning the missile velocity vector in the
anti-clockwise direction we are effectively increasing the component of the
missile velocity normal to the LOS, thus reducing the LOS rate, which is
desirable since it brings the missile close to the collision course.
107
Figure 6.5: Direction of latax in PN guidance law
homing guidance then the closing velocity is obtained from the doppler radar
used as the missile seeker or sensor and the LOS rate is obtained by measuring
the rate of rotation of the missile seeker tracking the target. If the missile
is command guided then these are computed on-ground from the tracking
radar data.
108
beginning. As a result, even an approaching but non-maneuvering target,
the latax demanded in the terminal phase is within moderate limits. The
trajectories for LOS and pursuit guidance given in Figs. 6.3 and 6.4, show
that these laws demand a high latax in the terminal phase of interception.
However, the PN guidance law does not perform well against maneuvering
targets. The reason is that though the PN law accounts for the target velocity
implicitly, it does not account for the target acceleration.
109
Keywords. Modern guidance law, Augmented proportional navigation,
Zero-effort-miss
Essentially the modern guidance laws attempt to take into account target
accelerations (i.e., target maneuvers), the time delay in the missile autopilot,
and the effect of noise and uncertainty in measurement and estimation, as
these are responsible for a missile’s failure to perform well. Theoretically,
many of them succeed in achieving their goals, but implementation of such
laws become difficult due to their inherent complexity. Much of the appli-
cation research on missile guidance is focused on the problem of efficient
implementation of these laws or incorporation of some of their desirable fea-
tures in classical guidance laws. Below we shall discuss two such guidance
laws : Augmented Proportional Navigation (APN) and the Modern Guidance
Scheme (MGS). Both can be considered to be extensions of the classical PN
law in a linearized geometry. Indeed, we shall develop these guidance laws as
logical extensions to the PN law, though their actual design could be done
more rigorously through optimal control theory.
tgo = tf − t
110
Figure 6.7: Small angle missile-target engagement geometry
aM = N Vc θ̇ = N Vc dθ
dt
and so,
R = Vc tgo
111
Since the angle θ is small,
θ∼
= sinθ = Y
R
= Y
Vc tgo
Then we have
d y d
aM = N Vc =N (yt−1 ) (6.1)
dt Vc tgo dt go
= N {ẏt−1 −2
go + y(−1)tgo (−1)} (6.2)
= N {ẏt−1 −2
go + ytgo } (6.3)
N
= (ẏtgo + y) (6.4)
t2go
Now, let us analyze the expression within brackets in the above equation.
It represents the (vertical) miss-distance that will occur at the end of time
tgo (i.e., at final time t), provided that the missile does not apply any latax.
Thus, this quantity is called the Zero-Effort-Miss (ZEM). Hence, the com-
manded missile latax for the classical PN law, in linearized geometry, can be
written as,
N
aM = (ZEM ) (6.5)
t2go
So, proportional navigation (PN) in the small angle case turns out to be
a guidance law which generates a latax command proportional to the ZEM
and inversely proportional to the square of the time-to-go.
112
We shall now extend this idea further to obtain the APN guidance law.
Suppose, in the same small angle case, we have a maneuvering target such
that it causes a non-zero Ÿ . Note that in the previous case (PN) we had
assumed a non-maneuvering target and so we had only a non-zero Ẏ which
was caused by the target velocity. Then, from simple kinematics, the ZEM
is given by,
= y + ẏtgo + (1/2)aT n t2 go
where, ÿ =aT n = target acceleration normal to the LOS. Then, the com-
manded latax is given by,
N
aM = {Y + Ẏ tgo + (1/2)aT n t2go } (6.6)
t2go
aM = N Vc θ̇ + (1/2)N aT n (6.7)
This can be easily deduced from the above equation. Note that in addition
to the LOS rate and the closing velocity, the APN guidance law also requires
the target acceleration normal to the LOS for its implementation. In fact
this requirement is its main drawback since measurement (or estimation) of
target acceleration is prone to noise.
113
The advantage of the APN guidance law, as compared to PN, is that
the commanded latax is initially high but falls as the missile approaches the
maneuvering target. This is shown in Fig.6.8 below. Though the APN law
takes into account the target acceleration, it does not account for the time
Figure 6.8: Command latax for PN and APN for different N and for maneu-
vering target
delay in the lateral autopilot of the missile which causes a difference between
the commanded latax and the achieved latax. The modern guidance scheme
described below takes this delay into account.
The modern guidance scheme is derived using the theory of optimal con-
trol. The latax that the missile pulls as it maneuvers induces a drag which
affects its velocity. In an attempt to minimize this maneuver induced drag,
the MGS guidance law is designed in such a way that it minimizes the fol-
114
lowing quantity (which is a measure of the maneuver induced drag) :
tf
a2M dt (6.8)
0
under the condition that the terminal miss-distance is zero. In the linearized
geometry (that is, small angle assumption) it means that y(tf )=0. Solving
this problem in a linearized setting, using optimal control theory, and assum-
ing the autopilot to be a first order dynamical system, we obtain the MGS
guidance law as,
N 1 2 (e−T + T − 1)
aM c = 2 y + ytgo + ( )aT n tgo − aM a (6.9)
tgo 2 w2
1
= τ
where τ is the time constant in the first order system which models the lateral
autopilot. Here, the navigation ”constant” N is no longer a constant but is
a time-varying quantity denoted by N’. It is given by,
6T 2 (e−T − 1 + T )
N = (6.11)
2T 3 + 3 + 6T − 6T 2 − 12T e−T − 3e−2T
The expression within brackets in the expression for aM c above represents the
ZEM. Note that the first part of the guidance law is identical to the APN
law. In fact, as the time delay t → 0, we have T → ∞, we get a perfect
autopilot. Also,
Lim N =3
(6.12)
T →∞
115
Hence, for a perfect autopilot, the guidance command reduces to the APN
guidance law with the optimal value of the navigation constant as 3. This jus-
tifies the choice of N as 3 to 5 in the PN and APN guidance laws. Translated
to the non-linear settings the MGS law is expressed as,
−T
1 e +T −1
aM c = N Vc θ̇ + N aT n − aM a (6.13)
2 T2
The MGS law has all the advantages of the APN guidance law in addition to
the advantage that it takes care of the autopilot time delay. It suffers from
the drawback that it requires the estimation or measurement of aT n , aM a and
tgo which are difficult to measure accurately.
Figure 6.9:
following questions:
116
(I) what should be the angle θM in order that the condition for LOS
guidance is met?
(II) Suppose the missile is guided by the pure pursuit guidance law then
what should be θM in order to satisfy the condition of velocity pursuit and
of attitude pursuit? The angle of attack is 2 degrees and the velocity vector
lags the missile longitudinal axis.
(III) Answer (II) when the missile is guided by a deviated pursuit guidance
law with the angel of deviation=2.5 degrees.
(I) What is the commanded latex if the missile uses (a) PN with N=4
(b) APN with N=3 (c) MGS with the current achieved latex same as the
commanded latex in (b) and the time delay t=0.1 sec?
(II) What is the estimated time-to-go? Is the actual time-to-go for the
three guidance laws less, more or the same as the estimated value? Assume
that the target employs a constant measure level, i.e., constant aT throughout
the engagement.
117
Figure 6.10:
118
Chapter 7
AIRCRAFT NAVIGATION
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the early days, when man-made vehicles were surface bound (either
on land or in the sea) and they seldom ventured far beyond easily recogniz-
able landmarks, the act of navigation could be carried out by humans using
their senses to determine direction distance, speed, and position. As vehicles
became more and more sophisticated and their field of operation expanded
to realms beyond the perception of limited human senses sophisticated nav-
119
igation instruments became necessary. Instead of known landmarks these
instruments used information learned from celestial bodies, certain distant
objects on the surface of the earth, and many other sources of information
to carry out the job of navigation.
∗ (or, more specifically) where is the aircraft now with respect to where
it should have been?
120
geodetic longitude (λ), and altitude (h) - as in en-route navigation for long
distance flights, or as polar coordinates with a ground-based navigational aid
as the origin, as in terminal areas.
121
7.2 TYPES OF NAVIGATION
Dead Reckoning
122
t
Veast = Vg cos θT X − Xo = Veast dt (7.2)
o
where, t is the measurement interval and (Y-Yo ) and (X-Xo ) are the distances
traveled due north and due east during this measurement interval. Notice
that a simple integration of unresolved ground speed 1/Vg would give curvi-
linear distance traveled but would be of little use for determining position.
Thus, one must integrate the velocity.
The above equations are extremely simplified and are given only to impart
an idea of the principle on which the dead reckoning system works. In reality
the actual dead reckoning computer must also account for cross winds, the
kinematics of the aircraft, its angular orientation, the geometry of the earth
and its attendant gravitational effects, and many other factors before it can
extrapolate in a reasonably accurate manner.
123
Position Fixing
Map reading involves matching what can be seen of the outside world
with a map and is the traditional method of position fixing on land and is
also used by general aviation in clear weather. Modern systems adopting this
technique uses a radar to obtain a picture of the ground from the air and a
computer matches it with a map stored in the form of a digital land mass
database. These system are called terrain referenced navigation aids.
Celestial navigation has been used by mariners for centuries. The basis
of celestial navigation is that if the altitude of a celestial object (measured in
terms of the angle between the line-of-sight and the horizontal) of a celestial
object is measured then the observer’s position must lie on a specific circle
(called the circle of position) on the surface of the earth centered on the
point on the earth which is directly below the object. This is shown in
Fig.7.2. If the time of observation is noted and the celestial object is a star
124
then this circle can easily be found using astronomical tables and charts.
Sightings on two or more such celestial objects will give two or more such
circles of position, and their intersection will give the position of the craft.
Though in the early days some aircraft did use celestial navigation this has
been abandoned nowadays in favour of better navigational aids. However, we
shall show that its basic principle (that of intersection of circles of position
to determine the exact position) will be used in a more general form in more
advanced navigation system.
Range and bearing navigational techniques are the basis of most modern
position fixing systems. They use modern electronic equipment for doing this
kind of measurement. Through individual measurements of range and bear-
ing, a line of position a line on which the craft is presumed to be located-is
established. In principle, it is somewhat similar to celestial navigation. The
line might be a small circle, great circle, hyperbola or some other curve con-
stituting the intersection of the surface of the earth (or a concentric surface at
the altitude of the aircraft) with a plane or a cone or a hyperboloid etc. The
common intersection of two or more nonparallel lines of position constitutes
the fix. If the lines are determined at different times, then one or more of
them must be adjusted for the assumed motion during the interval provide a
running fix. Occasionally, an actual position is not needed, a line of position
being adequate to ensure safety. This is called homing. The method is not
suitable when other aircraft are in the vicinity and a means of avoiding them
is not available.
125
(often hours) between fixes, dead reckoning is appropriately considered the
primary method. If fixes are available continuously or at very short intervals
(e.g., once each minute), the primary method might then be either dead
reckoning or position fixing or an integrated output of both.
126
7.3 THE LORAN SYSTEM
The receiver in the aircraft measures the difference between the time of
arrival of the pulse from the master station and the slave stations. The
time difference is measured using the third RF cycle in each pulse as the
reference point (see Fig.7.3). The locus of points of constant time difference
is a hyperbola-like line-of-position on the reference ellipsoid which models
the surface of the earth. By using the master and a second slave a second
127
Figure 7.3: The LORAN-C pulses
128
Figure 7.4: LORAN lines-of-position
129
Figure 7.5: The ”cocked hat”
130
Keywords. DECCA, OMEGA, VOR, INS, Integrated systems
7.4 DECCA
131
Figure 7.6: The phase difference in Decca
7.5 OMEGA
Omega is a system which works on the same principle as Decca. But its
operating frequency is very low (VLF). Essentially ground based transmitters
are employed to transmit in four fixed frequencies - 10.20 KHz, 11.05 KHz,
11.33 KHz and 13.60 KHz. Using VLF enables full worldwide coverage with
only eight transmitters placed at stations in Norway, Liberia, Hawaii, North
132
Figure 7.7: The phase comparator in Decca
133
Figure 7.8: The iso-phase lines in Decca
Range and bearing are the basis for most modern position fixing systems.
The range and.or bearings to a number of points whose position is known
are obtained and used to calculate the position of the observer. Hence, the
bearings to any existing radio transmission stations of known location could
be used for navigation purposes. Usually radio transmission is done at low
and medium frequencies to get wide coverage but when such signals are used
134
for bearing measurement, ionospheric and atmospheric conditions cause large
errors. To avoid this, one may use high frequency stations, but they have the
problem of limited range. To overcome some of these difficulties associated
with simple direction finding techniques a number of systems were developed
using dedicated transmitters. These provide specially modulated radio beams
so that when the signal is received by the aircraft the modulation obtained
depends on its position in the beam, thus providing navigational information.
One such system, which is widely used, is the VOR system.
135
Figure 7.9: The VOR system
136
accurate (and so very expensive!) accelerometers and gyros in applications
where the navigation is done by dead-reckoning over long periods of time.
To improve the accuracy of such systems, Strapped down systems were de-
signed which are attached to the body of the vehicle (rather than a gimbal
arrangement which decouples the vehicle movement).
1. Consider an aircraft flying over the surface of the earth and measuring
its own velocity using a doppler radar transmitting at 100 MHz. The radar
137
transmits along beams A and B shown in the figure given below. The doppler
shift in the signal along A is +100 Hz and along B is +150 Hz. Find the
velocity of the aircraft in terms of v and θ.
Figure 7.10:
138
<—– DEAD RECKONING ——> POSITION-FIXING
t(min) θ(deg) v(km/hr) (x,y) in km
0 59 62 (0,0)
10 48 60 (6,7)
20 29 63 (13,12)
30 0 60 (23,13)
(a) If the dead-reckoning computations are done using only the initial
position fix (0,0) then what is the error at each intermediate point? Plot
these intermediate points on a graph sheet.
(b) If the intermediate position fix information are also used, then find
the amount by which the position-fix information corrects the dead reckoning
computation at each intermediate point. Plot these points on the same graph
sheet.
(c) What is the computed position (by dead reckoning) of the vehicle at t
= 40 mins, when (i) no position fix information is used ? (ii) when position
fix information is used? (iii) What is the error between the two? Plot these
points on the same graph sheet.
4. In the above system let D = 100km. The slave receives the signal
from the master and transmits it after a coding delay of 10 msec. Derive the
equation for the line-of-position corresponding to a time difference of 10.5
msec between the master signal and the slave signal. Where does this line of
position intersect the base line?
139
Figure 7.11: The iso-phase lines in Decca
140