0% found this document useful (0 votes)
431 views2 pages

Aaker's Brand Identity Planning Model

David Aaker developed a comprehensive brand identity planning model that considers a brand from four perspectives: as a product, organization, person, and symbol. Each perspective provides distinct elements that can enrich a brand's identity. Aaker advises considering all four perspectives to fully articulate what the brand stands for to customers. Aaker's model aims to provide a detailed identity to guide brand implementation decisions.

Uploaded by

tricya1988
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
431 views2 pages

Aaker's Brand Identity Planning Model

David Aaker developed a comprehensive brand identity planning model that considers a brand from four perspectives: as a product, organization, person, and symbol. Each perspective provides distinct elements that can enrich a brand's identity. Aaker advises considering all four perspectives to fully articulate what the brand stands for to customers. Aaker's model aims to provide a detailed identity to guide brand implementation decisions.

Uploaded by

tricya1988
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Aaker’s Brand Identity Planning Model

David A. Aaker, a marketing professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of
the popular Building Strong Brands (1996), has developed a comprehensive brand identity
planning model. At the heart of this model is a four-fold perspective on the concept of a brand.
To help ensure that a firm’s brand identity has texture and depth, Aaker advises brand
strategists to consider the brand as: 1) a product; 2) an organization; 3) a person; and 4) a
symbol. Each perspective is distinct. The purpose of this system is to help brand strategists
consider different brand elements and patterns that can help clarify, enrich and differentiate an
identity. A more detailed identity will also help guide implementation decisions.

Aaker’s Brand Identity Planning Model


Aaker cautions that not every brand identity needs to employ all or even several of these
perspectives. For some brands, only one will be viable and appropriate. Each organization
should, however, consider all of the perspectives and use those deemed helpful in articulating
what the brand should stand for in the customer’s mind.

The following briefly characterizes each of the four perspectives Aaker recommends firms take
into account in formulating their brand strategy:

1. The brand-as-product. A core element of a brand’s identity is usually its product


thrust, which will affect the type of associations that are desirable and feasible.
Attributes directly related to the purchase or use of a product can provide functional
benefits and sometimes emotional benefits for customers. A product-related attribute
can create a value proposition by offering something extra like features or services, or
by offering something better. Aaker argues, however, that the goal of linking a brand
with a product class is not to gain recall of a product class when a brand is mentioned.
It’s more important, he posits, for customers to remember the brand when there’s a
need relevant to the product class.

2. The brand-as-organization. This perspective focuses on attributes of the organization


rather than on those of the product or service. Such organizational attributes as
innovation, a drive for quality and concern for the environment are created by the
people, culture, values and programs of the company. (Some brand aspects can be
described as product attributes in some contexts and organizational attributes in
others.) Aaker notes that organizational attributes are more enduring and resistant to
competitive claims than product attributes.

3. The brand-as-person. Like a person, a brand can be perceived as having a unique


personality. The brand-as-person perspective suggests a brand identity that is richer
and more interesting than one based on product attributes. Aaker cites three ways a
brand personality can create a stronger brand: 1) create a self-expressive benefit that
becomes a vehicle for customers to express their own personalities; 2) form the basis
of a relationship between customers and the brand (in the same way human
personalities affect relationships between people); and 3) help communicate a product
attribute and thus, contribute to a functional benefit.

4. The brand-as-symbol. A strong symbol can provide cohesion and structure to an


identity and make it much easier to gain recognition and recall. Its presence can be a
key ingredient of brand development and its absence can be a substantial handicap.
Elevating symbols to the status of being part of the identity reflects their potential
power. Aaker highlights three types of symbols: visual imagery, metaphors and the
brand heritage.
As suggested by Aaker’s elaborate brand taxonomy, brand identity consists of a core identity
and an extended identity. The former represents the timeless essence of the brand. It’s central
to both the meaning and success of the brand, and contains the associations that are most
likely to remain constant as the brand encompasses new products and travels to new markets.
The extended identity, on the other hand, includes elements that provide texture and
completeness. It fills in the picture, adding details that help portray what the brand stands for.
A reasonable hypothesis, Aaker states, is that within a product class, a larger extended identity
means a stronger brand—one that is more memorable, interesting and connected to customers’
lives.

Source

Aaker, David A.; Building Strong Brands; The Free Press; 1996.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy