Internal Audit Report H1 FY 17-18
Internal Audit Report H1 FY 17-18
1. PREAMBLE:
1.1 We have carried out Internal Audit of Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University (University or PDPU) for the period from April 2017to September 2017
in terms of scope of work.
1.2 We submit our report containing observations noticed during the audit along with management response.
2. AUDIT APPROACH:
ii) Review internal control systems with a view to assessing the efficiency of the system to see that chances of frauds and errors are minimized as
well as the system ensures effective checking of transactions at various levels.
iii) Gain understanding about the working environment and the internal controls system adopted in that relation.
iv) Verify documents i.e. bills, vouchers and records to satisfy that the established system is followed.
2.2 We have kept in background following broad criteria while ascertaining risk rating of the observations in the attached report:
High – Requiring immediate action More than Rs 3 Lakhs More than Rs 1 Lakhs Absence of Standard Processes
Impact of more than Rs 1 Lakh More than Rs 50,000 & Loopholes / area for improvement in
Medium – Requiring corrective action
up to Rs 3 Lakhs up to Rs 1 Lakh Standard Processes
Low – Opportunities for improvement Impact of Up to Rs 1 Lakh Up to Rs 50,000 Non-adherence to the Standard Processes
3. AUDIT METHODOLOGY:
3.1 The audit has been carried out in accordance with Auditing and Assurance Standards as well as Standards on Internal Audit prescribed by Institute of
Chartered Accountants of India.
4.1 As per Internal Audit Plan, following areas were covered by this report:
Based on the fees reconciliation of student’s data as per the administration Root Cause
department and fees collected record by accounts department, we have
noted short receipt of fees worth Rs. 35,85,100/- from students. (The status - Lack of adequate follow up and absence of strict implementation of
on 20/11/2017) penal provision.
School wise summary of fees recovery is mentioned hereunder: - Possibility of income leakage.
- Non-availability of outstanding details.
School Amount in Rs.
Recommendations
SLS 4,30,100
SPT 6,44,500 - For recovery of fees from the students who had not paid Fee, PDPU
SPM 12,42,500 should involve admin department and also impose penalty for
delayed payment.
SOT 12,68,000
Total 35,85,100 Management Response
Apart from the recovery of current year fees, we have verified the fees Root Cause
recovery from the students from whom fees for last year was not received
and reported by us. The Recovery of Rs. 20,92,600 /- is still pending from - Absence of proper follow up procedure of students for the recovery
30 students. List of such students has been given in Annexure-8 along with of pending fees.
the management response for non-recovery of fees. (Status as on
27/11/2017). Possible Impact
Recommendations
Management Response
- The procedure of preparing purchase order has been established and Root Cause
followed in majority of the purchase transactions. However,in
following 2 instances purchase order has not been prepared as - Lack of awareness among the concerned departments regarding
follows: importance of following these procedures.
- The purchase of LED monitor of Rs.14,500/- is expensed out instead Root Cause
of capitalizing it. It is booked as expense under head Computer Tools,
Spares Exps. - Delay caused by vendor in sending the copy of invoice relating to the
fixed asset purchased and further delay in receipt of invoice by
- Purchase of audio equipment for auditorium worth Rs. 8,45,000/- has accounts department.
been done from M/s Audio Vision without inviting quotations from
multiple parties and making comparative analysis. Possible Impact
- Purchase of RO System of Rs. 3,12,500/- has been done from A One - Delay in capitalization has a direct impact on the amount of
Engineering Corporation on 05/07/2017 but installation certificate depreciation charged against the asset.
has not been found for installation of such system at High rise hostel - Benefit of availability of same asset from other vendor is foregone if
C block. comparative analysis is not done.
- It has been found that there has been substantial delay in Recommendations
capitalization of fixed assets purchased even after obtaining
installation certificate of the specific assets. - The assets should be capitalized when it gets ready for the intended
use.
- Purchase of assets involving substantial amount should be done by
Some of the instances where such delay in capitalization has been inviting quotations from 3 parties and comparative analysis should be
noticed are depicted inAnnexure-9. done before finalizing vendor.
Management Response
- During the course of audit, we have identified following 2 cases in Root Cause
which booking and payment of expenses has been done twice against
the same bill: - Payment against copy of invoice
- Absence of Work Order / Purchase Order processing system
Date of entry Name of the party Amount excess - Delay in receiving invoices from the parties.
in books booked - Absence of policy to entertain the Bills of Vendor received after
Techno Gas Systems Pvt substantial time period
26/07/2017 3,35,720
Ltd
Possible Impact
- Under IEP for Sacred Heart University, visa charges has been charged
by Vagabond Holidays 30 students and 2 faculties. In total payment of - Excess payment to vendors
Rs. 4,69,200 has been made for 32 persons whereas 27 students and 2 - The payment made to vendor without services being availed.
faculties have attended the visit. This has resulted into excess payment - Blockage of funds due to excess payments made.
of Rs. 46,519 for 2 persons.
- Due compliance have been done. - The payment should be released only after the receipt of the original
copy of invoice from the concerned vendor.