CLIENT ABDUL MOTIN PROJECT TYPE: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING REPORT O! SUB — SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED NINE (09) STORIED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FOR ABDUL MOTIN, JL NO:- C.S-193. S.A 34, R.S 17, DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO.- 16, KHATIAN NO:-C.S 177, S.A 231, R.S 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO:- C.S AND S.A 1571, R.S 4783 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA: DAKKHINKHAN, P.S:- DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST: DHAKA. JANUARY 2021 Prepared By Ahmed Engineering Head Office: House # 98, Block # F, Road No # 10/6, South Banasree, Goran, Dhaka. E-mail:iftekhar_ahmed27@yahoo.com — Mobile: 019112275375, Determination of Settlement of soil: ‘The magnitude and rate of settlement due to consolidation of normally consolidated soils can be calculated by the following equations (Terzaghi, 1943) S = Ce H/ (1+ e0) logl 0 (Po + AP/Po Where, S = Settlement due to consolidation. Cc= Compression index to be determined from the results of consolidation tests. H= Thickness of the layer. If the soil is drained on top and bottom as in the consolidation test, half- thickness should be used. eo= natural void ratio of the soil in place. veight of soil above mid-height of the consolidating layer. AP=consolidation pressure = net additional pressure 6. EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN a) Shallow foundation For cohesive soil, the criteria for finding Bearing Capacity is based on the UN drained shear strength and there the soil is assumed as purely cohesive soil or may be estimated from the corrected SPT values. For granular soil it can be calculated from & c values obtained from direct shear tests or from based on corrected SPT values. On the basis of above criteria, the Bearing Capacitiesof the foundation have been evaluated according to Terzaghi, (Appendix A4: (TABLE-1)). ‘According to Tarzaghi’s formula: (For cohesive soil) 1. Square footing: Qu = 1.3c’Ne + yDNq + 0.4yBNy 2, Circular footing: Qu = 1.3c°Ne + yDNq + 0.3yBNy 3. Strip or Continuous footing: Qu = ¢’Ne + YDNgq + 0.5yBNy For purely cohesive soil, Tarzaghi assumed, = 0, c’=c and the bearing capacity factor are as follows: (for general shear failure), Ne= 5.7, Nq= 1, Ny=0 Tarzaghi (1943) proposed a bearing capacity formula: Quit = C Ne Se + y Df Nq + 0.5 y B NySy Where Se &Sy are shape factor. Tarzaghi assumed, c=0 kg/em?-Also these are as following: Table: 3 (Coefficient for the footing) For Square Circular Strip Sc 13 13 10 Sy 08 06 1.0) Page | 11According to Meyerhof (1951), the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing: (Ase for footing on slopes) Qu = ¢’Ne + yDiNq + 0.5yBNy Values of Ne, Nq & Ny are depend on ®. Reference: 1) Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering by Dr. K. R. Arora 2) Foundation analysis and Design by Joseph E. Bowles, 5" edition. ») Deep foundation: Determination of Pile Capacity (A Single Pile) The load applied to a single pile is carried jointly by the soil beneath the tip of the pile 2nd by soil around the shaft, and the maximum load that the pile can support -the pile capacity is Qu = Ap*Eb + [(f* 7D* L)] Where Q =Pile capacity Eb = end bearing capacity fS = shaft resistance (skin friction) Ap = area of pile point D = diameter of pile L= length of pile Qa=QuiF.S Where Qa = Allowable bearing capacity End bearin; Eb= 0.6 x N tsf< 45.0 tsf * N = standard penetration test value Skin friction : fs = a c (for cohesive soil) = N/6 in ton/m? (for granular soil) where a =adhesion factor c =shearing strength * Ref. Drilled Shafts, Manual, Student Workbook, Volume-1, National highway ‘ute, US Department of Transportation. Page-501-502) ing on the existing soil type, the values of both the skin friction as well as the end bearing ities of piles have been derived and provided in this report (Appendix A-4 Table-3).A5: Page | 12Table no: 5 Bearing Capacities of Laboratory Test (F.S = 2.50) the Shallow Foundation From the field and BH-L Depth | Depthin | SPT ee Sample | Bearing For ce poe" | se | ee | om |Caa" | sect 15)/2 152 5 2 2 e 0.69 0.55 3.04 10 2 2 c 0.69 0.55 4.57 15 16 15.5 G 3.12 2.44 6.09 20 20 175 © 3.48 27 7.62 25 2 18.5 c 3.66 286 | BH-2 | Depth | Depthint. | SPT_ Value Corrected | Sample | Bearing For inm noe oe oak —— 13) cist) 152 a 2 2 c 0.69 035 3.04 10 3 3 e 0.87 0.69 457 15 15 15 q 3.03 237 6.09 20 18 165 Gc 3.30 2.58 7.62 3 | 3B 19 ¢ 3.75 2.93 Page |13(Table No — 6) the unit allowable skin friction and the unit allowable tip resistance capacities for the bored cast-in-situ pile in ton per square feet (tsf) (F.S = 3.0). BH-01 Depth Depth SPT | Corrected Sample | Allowable skin | Allowable End inm in ft. Value | SPT Value type friction (f), tsf | Bearing (Ev), tsf N*=N-(N- 15)/2 1.524 5 2 2 e 0.084 12 3.048 10 2 2 c 0.084 12 4572 15 16 15.5 c 0.1245 93 6.096 20 20 17.5 c 0.1305 10.5 7.62 25 22 18.5 CG 0.1335 11.1 9.144 30 24 19.5 G 0.1365 11.7 10.668 35 27 21 ec 0.141 12.6 12.192 40 30 22.5 5 0.1455 13.5 13.716 45 18 16.5 s 0.1275 99 15.24 50, 22 18.5 s 0.1335 1. 16.76 55 18 16.5 s 0.1275 9.9 18.28 60 16 15.5 s 0.1245 93 19.81 65 18 16.5 Ss 0.1275 99 21.33 70 19 17 Ss 0.129 10.2 22.86 75 36 25.5 s 0.1545 153 24.38 80 38 26.5 Ss 0.1575 15.9 25.91 85 20 175 s 0.1305 10.5 27.43 90 32 Bs s 0.1485 14.1 28.96 95 41 28 5 0.162 16.8 30.48 100 50 32.5 Ss 0.1755 19.5 Page | 14BH-02 report. r T Depth Depth SPT | Corrected Sample | Allowable skin | Allowable End inm in ft. Value | SPT Value type friction (fy, tsf | Bearing (Ex) , tsf N#=N-(N- 15)/2 1,524 5 2 2 c 0.084 12 3.048 10 3 3 c 0.087, 18 4.572 15 15 15 Cc 0.123 9 6.096 20 18 16.5 Cc 0.1275 9.9 7.62 25 23 19 G 0.135 114 9.144 30 25 20 Cc 0.138 12 10.668 35 28 21.5 c 0.1425, 12.9 12.192 40 29 22 s 0.144 13.2 13.716 45 16 15.5 Ss 0.1245 9.3 15.24 50 20 175 Ss 0.1305 10.5 16.76 55 17 16 s 0.126 9.6 18.28 60 18 16.5 Ss 0.1275 9 19.81 65 16 15.5 Ss 0.1245 93 21.33 70 17 16 s 0.126 9.6 22.86 75 32. 235 s 0.1485 14.1 24.38 80 36 25.5 s 0.1545 15.3 25.91 85 26 20.5 Ss 0.1395 12.3 27.43 90 30 22.5 Ss 0.1455 13.5 28.96 95 42 28.5 s 0.1635 ial 30.48 100 50 32.5 | s 0.1755 19.5 _| a. SPT (N) values are corrected within calculation. b. _ Self-weight of pile and negative skin frictions are not considered in this Design engineer is free from any obligation to use these values. He/she can refine/calculate, taking the soil parameters obtained from field & lab Symbol a C: tests. = Clay, S = Sand Page | 157. Sample calculation of pile capacity For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 18°") Diameter of pileD = 18" = 1.5" Area of pile tip. Ap D*/4 = x* 1.5/4 = 1,767 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P =xD =a*1.5=4.712 ft Length of pile, L 5.91m (85ft.) Effective pile length, L-= 80ft. Average Skin friction, i= 0.13 tsf. ‘Average End bearing, Ey = 11.12tsf ‘Allowable pile capacity, Po = Ap Et +P Le fi = 1.767*11,12+4.712*800.13 =70 ton For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 20°") Diameter of pileD = 20° = 1.67° Area of pile tip. Ap = "D/4= m*1.677/4 = 2.19 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P_ =D =1*1.67 = 5.25 ft. Length of pile,L = 25.91m (85ft.) Effective pile length, Le =80ft. Average Skin friction, fs = 0.13tsf. Average End bearing, Ey= 11.12 tsf Allowable pile capacity, P. Eo +PLe f .19*11,12+5.25*80*0.13 = 80 ton For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 24”*) Diameter of pileD =24"=2° Area of pile tip. Ap = 2D?/4 = 0*22/4 = 3.1416 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P Length of pile, L Effective pile length, Le Average Skin friction, f = 0.13tsf. Average End bearing, Ep= 11.12 tsf Allowable pile capacity, Pa = Ap Eb + P Le fs 3.1416*11.12+6.28*80*0.13 = 102 ton Page | 16CONCLUSION & RECOMME) CONCLESLOKD ee eerr—"—on— On the basis of aforesaid conclusions, the following recommendations are suggested for Construction Of Proposed Nine (09) Storied Residential Building For Abdul Motin, JI No:- C,S-193. S.A 34, R.S 17, Dhaka City Survey No. 16. Khatian No:-- C.S 177, S.A 231 R.S 415, Dhaka City Survey 2650 And 3071. Dag No: C.S And S.A 1571, R.S 4783 Dhaka City Survey No. 33568. Mouza: Dakkhit khan, P.S:-Dhakkhinkhann, Dist:- Dhaka. From, the field and laboratory test results, consistency of top layer of soil and nature of the structure, we may suggest as follows. ‘*** R.C.C Shallow foundation may be constructed by excavating 12’-0"" (3.65m) of soil form existing ground surface. Foundation bed should be well compacted before placing of lower part of foundation. Bearing capacity may be taken as 2.49 tsf- #** RCC cast-in-situ circular pile may be constructed. For 80 ft. long pile from existing ground surface, capacity of each pile may be taken as Diameter of Pile Bearing Capacity 24” dia 102 ton 20” dia 80 ton 18” dia 70 ton > These are all rough suggestion. The structural designer will take final decision depending on load on the foundation. > PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE ‘¢ In case of any excavation, it should be designed properly taking are of existing building, utility lines & available techniques. © Seismic factors must be considered in design (Ref: Seismic Zoning map of Bangladesh, BNBC) Note. a) 1Tsf=2ksf= 1.09 Kg/em?, 1Ton (US)= 1000kg = 2000 Ibs, E.G.L. = Existing Ground Level. b) Foundation base should be kept dry during construction period. c) In nature, soils are neither homogeneous nor isotropic. 4) Pile load test should be performed. if pile load test is not performed then the value of pile should be considered half ) ©) Experience and judgment are always necessary in adoy parameters to use the calculation of ultimate bearing capacity: NGR. MOHSIN JAMAN Be Enaine gui Bs Fellow Mi ) Fipad, ol & Fewnaabien B14"ried Residential Building, SITE PLAN Ahmed Engineering Astruction of Proposed 09 (Nine)} fat Dhakkhinkhan, Dhaka, [ 0-9 13? BH-2 iT ROAD) 10' BH-1 10' | / 36'-0"BOREHOLE LOG ‘Ahmed Engineering Name of Project: ‘Construction of Proposed 09 (Nine) Storied Residential Building. DAKKHINKHAN, P.S:-DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST:- DHAKA. TLNO= CS-195. SAS4RS17 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO- 16. KHATIAN NO— CS 177 8.A 231 RS 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO: C. AND S.A 1571, RS 4783 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA. [Mosty CLAY Representative Dsurted undisturbed Sample [Ground Water eve 215 5 Fae BE Description of Soil St gale 3 3] £|2 EES i)? 2 Very Soft Rabish i 2 | ese Lica A vs] | [200 Clay ‘Stiff Gray Clay aw 7 1 149 * 5 207BOREHOLE LOG Anmed Engineering Name of Project: ‘Construction of Proposed 09 (Nine) Storied Residential Building. Client: ILNO= CS: “193, SA34RS 17 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO- 16. KHATIAN NO: CS 177S.A 231 RS 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO: C. AND S.A 1571, RS 4783, DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA: DAKKHINKHAN, P.S-DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST: DHAKA. Borehole No.: LEGENDS. Depth of Boring: [Mostly GRAVEL, [ostly CLAY jcwT Mostly Coarse SAND| [fj Representative Disturbed aac [> ieamanaaaee ost LT 1 [Ground Water Level Graphical SBE Representation off —| 2 | 2/5) S| Nvalues | &| 0 |5/2] 2 2| 2/213] Zt F | 8 |3|| 4 |e Very Soft Rabish 3 ‘Soft Light Gray Clay . 77| 23 1.58) Stiff Gray ClayCLIENT ABDUL MOTIN PROJECT TYPE: RESIDENTIAL BUILDING REPORT O! SUB — SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED NINE (09) STORIED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FOR ABDUL MOTIN, JL NO:- C.S-193. S.A 34, R.S 17, DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO.- 16, KHATIAN NO:-C.S 177, S.A 231, R.S 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO:- C.S AND S.A 1571, R.S 4783 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA: DAKKHINKHAN, P.S:- DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST: DHAKA. JANUARY 2021 Prepared By Ahmed Engineering Head Office: House # 98, Block # F, Road No # 10/6, South Banasree, Goran, Dhaka. E-mail:iftekhar_ahmed27@yahoo.com — Mobile: 019112275375, Determination of Settlement of soil: ‘The magnitude and rate of settlement due to consolidation of normally consolidated soils can be calculated by the following equations (Terzaghi, 1943) S = Ce H/ (1+ e0) logl 0 (Po + AP/Po Where, S = Settlement due to consolidation. Cc= Compression index to be determined from the results of consolidation tests. H= Thickness of the layer. If the soil is drained on top and bottom as in the consolidation test, half- thickness should be used. eo= natural void ratio of the soil in place. veight of soil above mid-height of the consolidating layer. AP=consolidation pressure = net additional pressure 6. EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN a) Shallow foundation For cohesive soil, the criteria for finding Bearing Capacity is based on the UN drained shear strength and there the soil is assumed as purely cohesive soil or may be estimated from the corrected SPT values. For granular soil it can be calculated from & c values obtained from direct shear tests or from based on corrected SPT values. On the basis of above criteria, the Bearing Capacitiesof the foundation have been evaluated according to Terzaghi, (Appendix A4: (TABLE-1)). ‘According to Tarzaghi’s formula: (For cohesive soil) 1. Square footing: Qu = 1.3c’Ne + yDNq + 0.4yBNy 2, Circular footing: Qu = 1.3c°Ne + yDNq + 0.3yBNy 3. Strip or Continuous footing: Qu = ¢’Ne + YDNgq + 0.5yBNy For purely cohesive soil, Tarzaghi assumed, = 0, c’=c and the bearing capacity factor are as follows: (for general shear failure), Ne= 5.7, Nq= 1, Ny=0 Tarzaghi (1943) proposed a bearing capacity formula: Quit = C Ne Se + y Df Nq + 0.5 y B NySy Where Se &Sy are shape factor. Tarzaghi assumed, c=0 kg/em?-Also these are as following: Table: 3 (Coefficient for the footing) For Square Circular Strip Sc 13 13 10 Sy 08 06 1.0) Page | 11According to Meyerhof (1951), the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing: (Ase for footing on slopes) Qu = ¢’Ne + yDiNq + 0.5yBNy Values of Ne, Nq & Ny are depend on ®. Reference: 1) Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering by Dr. K. R. Arora 2) Foundation analysis and Design by Joseph E. Bowles, 5" edition. ») Deep foundation: Determination of Pile Capacity (A Single Pile) The load applied to a single pile is carried jointly by the soil beneath the tip of the pile 2nd by soil around the shaft, and the maximum load that the pile can support -the pile capacity is Qu = Ap*Eb + [(f* 7D* L)] Where Q =Pile capacity Eb = end bearing capacity fS = shaft resistance (skin friction) Ap = area of pile point D = diameter of pile L= length of pile Qa=QuiF.S Where Qa = Allowable bearing capacity End bearin; Eb= 0.6 x N tsf< 45.0 tsf * N = standard penetration test value Skin friction : fs = a c (for cohesive soil) = N/6 in ton/m? (for granular soil) where a =adhesion factor c =shearing strength * Ref. Drilled Shafts, Manual, Student Workbook, Volume-1, National highway ‘ute, US Department of Transportation. Page-501-502) ing on the existing soil type, the values of both the skin friction as well as the end bearing ities of piles have been derived and provided in this report (Appendix A-4 Table-3).A5: Page | 12Table no: 5 Bearing Capacities of Laboratory Test (F.S = 2.50) the Shallow Foundation From the field and BH-L Depth | Depthin | SPT ee Sample | Bearing For ce poe" | se | ee | om |Caa" | sect 15)/2 152 5 2 2 e 0.69 0.55 3.04 10 2 2 c 0.69 0.55 4.57 15 16 15.5 G 3.12 2.44 6.09 20 20 175 © 3.48 27 7.62 25 2 18.5 c 3.66 286 | BH-2 | Depth | Depthint. | SPT_ Value Corrected | Sample | Bearing For inm noe oe oak —— 13) cist) 152 a 2 2 c 0.69 035 3.04 10 3 3 e 0.87 0.69 457 15 15 15 q 3.03 237 6.09 20 18 165 Gc 3.30 2.58 7.62 3 | 3B 19 ¢ 3.75 2.93 Page |13(Table No — 6) the unit allowable skin friction and the unit allowable tip resistance capacities for the bored cast-in-situ pile in ton per square feet (tsf) (F.S = 3.0). BH-01 Depth Depth SPT | Corrected Sample | Allowable skin | Allowable End inm in ft. Value | SPT Value type friction (f), tsf | Bearing (Ev), tsf N*=N-(N- 15)/2 1.524 5 2 2 e 0.084 12 3.048 10 2 2 c 0.084 12 4572 15 16 15.5 c 0.1245 93 6.096 20 20 17.5 c 0.1305 10.5 7.62 25 22 18.5 CG 0.1335 11.1 9.144 30 24 19.5 G 0.1365 11.7 10.668 35 27 21 ec 0.141 12.6 12.192 40 30 22.5 5 0.1455 13.5 13.716 45 18 16.5 s 0.1275 99 15.24 50, 22 18.5 s 0.1335 1. 16.76 55 18 16.5 s 0.1275 9.9 18.28 60 16 15.5 s 0.1245 93 19.81 65 18 16.5 Ss 0.1275 99 21.33 70 19 17 Ss 0.129 10.2 22.86 75 36 25.5 s 0.1545 153 24.38 80 38 26.5 Ss 0.1575 15.9 25.91 85 20 175 s 0.1305 10.5 27.43 90 32 Bs s 0.1485 14.1 28.96 95 41 28 5 0.162 16.8 30.48 100 50 32.5 Ss 0.1755 19.5 Page | 14BH-02 report. r T Depth Depth SPT | Corrected Sample | Allowable skin | Allowable End inm in ft. Value | SPT Value type friction (fy, tsf | Bearing (Ex) , tsf N#=N-(N- 15)/2 1,524 5 2 2 c 0.084 12 3.048 10 3 3 c 0.087, 18 4.572 15 15 15 Cc 0.123 9 6.096 20 18 16.5 Cc 0.1275 9.9 7.62 25 23 19 G 0.135 114 9.144 30 25 20 Cc 0.138 12 10.668 35 28 21.5 c 0.1425, 12.9 12.192 40 29 22 s 0.144 13.2 13.716 45 16 15.5 Ss 0.1245 9.3 15.24 50 20 175 Ss 0.1305 10.5 16.76 55 17 16 s 0.126 9.6 18.28 60 18 16.5 Ss 0.1275 9 19.81 65 16 15.5 Ss 0.1245 93 21.33 70 17 16 s 0.126 9.6 22.86 75 32. 235 s 0.1485 14.1 24.38 80 36 25.5 s 0.1545 15.3 25.91 85 26 20.5 Ss 0.1395 12.3 27.43 90 30 22.5 Ss 0.1455 13.5 28.96 95 42 28.5 s 0.1635 ial 30.48 100 50 32.5 | s 0.1755 19.5 _| a. SPT (N) values are corrected within calculation. b. _ Self-weight of pile and negative skin frictions are not considered in this Design engineer is free from any obligation to use these values. He/she can refine/calculate, taking the soil parameters obtained from field & lab Symbol a C: tests. = Clay, S = Sand Page | 157. Sample calculation of pile capacity For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 18°") Diameter of pileD = 18" = 1.5" Area of pile tip. Ap D*/4 = x* 1.5/4 = 1,767 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P =xD =a*1.5=4.712 ft Length of pile, L 5.91m (85ft.) Effective pile length, L-= 80ft. Average Skin friction, i= 0.13 tsf. ‘Average End bearing, Ey = 11.12tsf ‘Allowable pile capacity, Po = Ap Et +P Le fi = 1.767*11,12+4.712*800.13 =70 ton For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 20°") Diameter of pileD = 20° = 1.67° Area of pile tip. Ap = "D/4= m*1.677/4 = 2.19 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P_ =D =1*1.67 = 5.25 ft. Length of pile,L = 25.91m (85ft.) Effective pile length, Le =80ft. Average Skin friction, fs = 0.13tsf. Average End bearing, Ey= 11.12 tsf Allowable pile capacity, P. Eo +PLe f .19*11,12+5.25*80*0.13 = 80 ton For cast-in-situ pile (Considering D = 24”*) Diameter of pileD =24"=2° Area of pile tip. Ap = 2D?/4 = 0*22/4 = 3.1416 sq. ft. Perimeter of pile, P Length of pile, L Effective pile length, Le Average Skin friction, f = 0.13tsf. Average End bearing, Ep= 11.12 tsf Allowable pile capacity, Pa = Ap Eb + P Le fs 3.1416*11.12+6.28*80*0.13 = 102 ton Page | 16CONCLUSION & RECOMME) CONCLESLOKD ee eerr—"—on— On the basis of aforesaid conclusions, the following recommendations are suggested for Construction Of Proposed Nine (09) Storied Residential Building For Abdul Motin, JI No:- C,S-193. S.A 34, R.S 17, Dhaka City Survey No. 16. Khatian No:-- C.S 177, S.A 231 R.S 415, Dhaka City Survey 2650 And 3071. Dag No: C.S And S.A 1571, R.S 4783 Dhaka City Survey No. 33568. Mouza: Dakkhit khan, P.S:-Dhakkhinkhann, Dist:- Dhaka. From, the field and laboratory test results, consistency of top layer of soil and nature of the structure, we may suggest as follows. ‘*** R.C.C Shallow foundation may be constructed by excavating 12’-0"" (3.65m) of soil form existing ground surface. Foundation bed should be well compacted before placing of lower part of foundation. Bearing capacity may be taken as 2.49 tsf- #** RCC cast-in-situ circular pile may be constructed. For 80 ft. long pile from existing ground surface, capacity of each pile may be taken as Diameter of Pile Bearing Capacity 24” dia 102 ton 20” dia 80 ton 18” dia 70 ton > These are all rough suggestion. The structural designer will take final decision depending on load on the foundation. > PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE ‘¢ In case of any excavation, it should be designed properly taking are of existing building, utility lines & available techniques. © Seismic factors must be considered in design (Ref: Seismic Zoning map of Bangladesh, BNBC) Note. a) 1Tsf=2ksf= 1.09 Kg/em?, 1Ton (US)= 1000kg = 2000 Ibs, E.G.L. = Existing Ground Level. b) Foundation base should be kept dry during construction period. c) In nature, soils are neither homogeneous nor isotropic. 4) Pile load test should be performed. if pile load test is not performed then the value of pile should be considered half ) ©) Experience and judgment are always necessary in adoy parameters to use the calculation of ultimate bearing capacity: NGR. MOHSIN JAMAN Be Enaine gui Bs Fellow Mi ) Fipad, ol & Fewnaabien B14"ried Residential Building, SITE PLAN Ahmed Engineering Astruction of Proposed 09 (Nine)} fat Dhakkhinkhan, Dhaka, [ 0-9 13? BH-2 iT ROAD) 10' BH-1 10' | / 36'-0"BOREHOLE LOG ‘Ahmed Engineering Name of Project: ‘Construction of Proposed 09 (Nine) Storied Residential Building. DAKKHINKHAN, P.S:-DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST:- DHAKA. TLNO= CS-195. SAS4RS17 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO- 16. KHATIAN NO— CS 177 8.A 231 RS 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO: C. AND S.A 1571, RS 4783 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA. [Mosty CLAY Representative Dsurted undisturbed Sample [Ground Water eve 215 5 Fae BE Description of Soil St gale 3 3] £|2 EES i)? 2 Very Soft Rabish i 2 | ese Lica A vs] | [200 Clay ‘Stiff Gray Clay aw 7 1 149 * 5 207BOREHOLE LOG Anmed Engineering Name of Project: ‘Construction of Proposed 09 (Nine) Storied Residential Building. Client: ILNO= CS: “193, SA34RS 17 DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO- 16. KHATIAN NO: CS 177S.A 231 RS 415, DHAKA CITY SURVEY 2650 AND 3071. DAG NO: C. AND S.A 1571, RS 4783, DHAKA CITY SURVEY NO. 33568. MOUZA: DAKKHINKHAN, P.S-DHAKKHINKHANN, DIST: DHAKA. Borehole No.: LEGENDS. Depth of Boring: [Mostly GRAVEL, [ostly CLAY jcwT Mostly Coarse SAND| [fj Representative Disturbed aac [> ieamanaaaee ost LT 1 [Ground Water Level Graphical SBE Representation off —| 2 | 2/5) S| Nvalues | &| 0 |5/2] 2 2| 2/213] Zt F | 8 |3|| 4 |e Very Soft Rabish 3 ‘Soft Light Gray Clay . 77| 23 1.58) Stiff Gray Clay