Question #1 of 135 Question ID: 1472853

If the growth rate in dividends is too high, it should be replaced with:

A) the growth rate in earnings per share.

B) a growth rate closer to that of gross domestic product (GDP).
C) the average growth rate of the industry.

Explanation

A firm cannot, in the long term, grow at a rate significantly greater than the growth rate of
the economy in which it operates. If the growth rate in dividends is too high, then it is best
replaced by a growth rate closer to that of GDP.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #2 of 135 Question ID: 1472901

Relative to traditional financial models like the dividend discount model, the biggest
advantage of spreadsheet modeling is:

A) accuracy of computations.
B) quantity of computations.
C) simplicity of computations.

Explanation

Computations are no simpler or more complicated on a spreadsheet as opposed to a

calculator. Accuracy tends to be improved with the use of a spreadsheet, because you
don't have to punch numbers into a calculator at any stage. However, someone truly
concerned with accuracy can do a fine job with a calculator. The spreadsheet stands out
when it comes to quantity. Analysts can program many permutations and scenarios into a
spreadsheet, using minutes to do what would take hours or even days or weeks with a
calculator.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.o)

Question #3 of 135 Question ID: 1472939

The current market price per share for Burton, Inc. is $33.33, and an analyst is using the
Gordon Growth model to determine whether this is a fair price. The company paid a
dividend of $2.00 last year on earnings of $2.50 a share. If the required rate of return is
12.00% and the expected grown rate in earnings and in dividends is 6%, the current market
price is most likely:

A) correctly valued.
B) undervalued.
C) overvalued.

Explanation

The value per share using the estimates is $35.33 = [$2.00(1.06) / 0.12 − 0.06)]. This is
higher than the current share price.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.j)

Question #4 of 135 Question ID: 1472805

Multi-stage growth models can become computationally intensive. For this reason they are
often referred to as:

A) quadratic models.
B) R-squared models.
C) spreadsheet models.

Explanation

The computationally intensive nature of these models make them a perfect application for
a spreadsheet program, hence the name spreadsheet models.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #5 of 135 Question ID: 1472878

The most appropriate model for analyzing a profitable high-tech firm is the:

A) H-model.
B) zero growth cash flow model.
C) three-stage dividend discount model (DDM).
Explanation

Most of high-tech firms grow at very high rates and are expected to grow at those rates for
an initial period. These rates are expected to decline as the firm grows in size and loses its
competitive advantage. Of the models provided, the three-stage DDM is most appropriate
to analyze high-tech firms because of its flexibility. H-model may not be appropriate,
because a linear decline from the high growth rate to the constant growth rate cannot be
assumed and the dividend payout ratio is fixed.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #6 of 135 Question ID: 1472882

An analyst has compiled the following financial data for ABC, Inc.:

ABC, Inc. Valuation Scenarios

Item Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Year 0 Dividends per

$1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50
Share

Long-term Treasury
4.0% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Bond Rate

Expected Return on the

12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0%
S&P 500

Beta 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Year 1, g=20%

Year 2, g=18%

Years 1-3, Year 3, g=16%

g (growth rate in g=12.0% Year 4, g=9%

0.0% 3.0%
dividends) After Year 3, Year 5, g=8%
g=3.0%
Year 6, g=7%

After Year 6,
g=4%

If year 0 dividend is $1.50 per share, the required rate of return of shareholders is 15.2%,
what is the value of ABC, Inc.'s stock price using the H-Model? Assume that the growth in
dividends has been 20% for the last 8 years, but is expected to decline 3% per year for the
next 5 years to a stable growth rate of 5%.

A) $19.85.
B) $24.26.
C) $20.95.

Explanation
Use the H-Model to value the firm. The H-Model assumes that the initial growth rate (ga)
will decline linearly to the stable growth rate (gn). The high growth period is assumed to
last 2H years. Hence, the value per share = DPSo(1 + gn) / (r − gn) + DPSo × H × (ga − gn) / (r
− gn)

(1.5 × 1.05) / (0.152 − 0.05) + [1.5 × (5 / 2) × (0.20 − 0.05)] / (0.152 − 0.05)

1.575 / 0.102 + 0.5625 / 0.102

15.44 + 5.51 = $20.95

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #7 of 135 Question ID: 1472877

An analyst has collected the following data on two companies:

Middle Hickory Co. Lower Elm Inc.

FCFE Negative Positive and growing

Capital investment Significant Decreasing

Which dividend-discount model is the best option for valuing the two companies?

Middle Hickory Lower Elm

Gordon
A) Three-stage
Growth

Gordon
B) Two-stage
Growth

C) Three-stage Two-stage

Explanation

Middle Hickory is in the initial-growth phase, while Lower Elm is in the transition phase.
The three-stage model is appropriate for new, fast-growing companies. The two-stage
model is appropriate for companies in the transitional phase.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #8 of 135 Question ID: 1472873

Which of the following dividend discount models assumes a high growth rate with a linear
decline to a lower stable growth rate?

A) Gordon growth model.

B) H model.
C) Three-stage dividend discount model.

Explanation

The H model assumes a high growth rate during the initial stage, followed by a linear
decline to a lower stable growth rate. It also assumes that the payout ratio is constant
over time.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #9 of 135 Question ID: 1472852

Applying the Gordon growth model to value a firm experiencing supernormal growth would
result in:

A) overstating the value of the firm.

B) understating the value of the firm.
C) a zero value.

Explanation

Applying the Gordon growth model to such a firm would result in an estimate of value
based on the assumption that the supernormal growth would continue indefinitely. This
would overstate the value of the firm.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #10 of 135 Question ID: 1472859

Xerxes, Inc. forecasts earnings to be permanently fixed at $4.00 per share. Current market
price is $35 and required return is 10%. Assuming the shares are properly priced, the
present value of growth opportunities is closest to:

A) -$5.00.
B) +$5.00.
C) +$3.50.
Explanation

Share price = (no-growth earnings / required return) + PVGO

35 = (4 / 0.10) + PVGO

PVGO = -$5.00

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)

Question #11 of 135 Question ID: 1472913

An investor projects the price of a stock to be $16.00 in one year and expected the stock to
pay a dividend at that time of $2.00. If the required rate of return on the shares is 11%, what
is the current value of the shares?

A) $15.28.
B) $16.22.
C) $14.11.

Explanation

The value of the shares = ($16.00 + $2.00) / (1 + 0.11) = $16.22

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #12 of 135 Question ID: 1472916

Given that a firm's current dividend is $2.00, the forecasted growth is 7%, declining over
three years to a stable 5% thereafter, and the current value of the firm's shares is $45, what
is the required rate of return?

A) 10.5%.
B) 9.8%.
C) 7.8%.

Explanation
The required rate of return is 9.8%.

r = ($2/$45) [(1 + 0.05) + (3/2)(0.07 – 0.05)] + 0.05 = 0.0980

Since the H-model is an approximation model, it is possible to solve for r directly without
iteration.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #13 of 135 Question ID: 1472848

If the value of an 8%, fixed-rate, perpetual preferred share is $134, the risk free rate is 3%,
and the par value is $100, the required rate of return is closest to:

A) 6%.
B) 7%.
C) 9%.

Explanation

The required rate of return is 6%: V0 = ($100par × 8%) / r = $134, r = 5.97%

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.d)

Question #14 of 135 Question ID: 1472911

An investor buys shares of a firm at $10.00. A year later she receives a dividend of $0.96 and
sells the shares at $9.00. What is her holding period return on this investment?

A) -0.8%.
B) +1.2%.
C) -0.4%.

Explanation

The holding period return = ($0.96 + $9.00 / $10.00) – 1 = – 0.004 or – 0.4%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #15 of 135 Question ID: 1472887

An analyst has forecasted dividend growth for Triple Crown, Inc., to be 8% for the next two
years, declining to 5% over the following three years, and then remaining at 5% thereafter. If
the current dividend is $4.00, and the required return is 10%, what is the current value of
Triple Crown shares based on a three-stage model?

A) $91.11.
B) $73.68.
C) $92.23.

Explanation

D1 = Year 1 dividend (after one year of 8% growth) = $4 × (1 + 0.08) = $4.32

PV(D1) = $4.32/(1+10%) = $3.93

D2 = Year 2 dividend (after two years of 8% growth) = $4 × (1 + 0.08)2 = $4.67

PV(D2) = $4.67/(1 + 10%)2 = $3.86

H-Model value as of the end of year 2

= D0 × (1 + gL)/(r − gL) + D0 × H ×(gS − gL)/r − gL

= $4.67 × (1 + 5%)/(10% − 5%) + $4.67 × (3/2) × (8% − 5%)/(10% − 5%)

= $102.18

PV(H-model) = 102.17664/(1.10)2 = $84.44

Total current value of Triple Crown shares:

V0 = PV(D1) + PV(D2) + PV(H-model) = $3.93 + $3.86 + $84.44 = $92.23

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #16 of 135 Question ID: 1472815

The H-model is more flexible than the two-stage dividend discount model (DDM) because:

A) terminal value is not sensitive to the estimates of growth rates.

B) initial high growth rate declines linearly to the level of stable growth rate.
C) payout ratio changes to adjust the changes in growth estimates.

Explanation
A sudden decline in high growth rate in two-stage DDM may not be realistic. This problem
is solved in the H-model, as the initial high growth rate is not constant, but declines
linearly over time to reach the stable-growth rate.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #17 of 135 Question ID: 1472829

JAD just paid a dividend of $0.80. Analysts expect dividends to grow at 25% in the next two
years, 15% in years three and four, and 8% for year five and after. The market required rate
of return is 10%, and Treasury bills are yielding 4%. JAD has a beta of 1.4. The estimated
current price of JAD is closest to:

A) $25.42.
B) $45.91.
C) $29.34.

Explanation
JAD's stock price today can be calculated using the three-stage model. Start by finding the
value of the dividends for the next four years with the two different dividend growth rates.

D1 = D0(1+g) = $0.80(1.25) = $1.00

D2 = D1(1+g) = $1.00(1.25) = $1.25

D3 = D2(1+g) = $1.25(1.15) = $1.4375

D4 = D3(1+g) = $1.4375(1.15) = $1.6531

(Alternatively, you could use your financial calculators to solve for the future value to find
D1, D2, D3, and D4.)

Next find the value of the stock at the beginning of the constant growth period using the
constant dividend discount model:
D5
P4 =
r − g

CAPM : r = 0.04 + [1.4 × (0.10 − 0.04)] = 0.124

D5 = D4 × (1 + g) = $1.6531 × 1.08 = $1.785

D5 $1.785
P4 = = = $40.57
r − g 0.124 − 0.08

The easiest way to proceed is to use the NPV function in the financial calculator.

CF0 = 0; CF1 = 1.00; CF2 = 1.25; CF3 = 1.4375; CF4 = 1.6531 + 40.57 = 42.22

I = 12.4; NPV = 29.34

The value of the firm today is $29.34 per share.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #18 of 135 Question ID: 1472831

A firm currently has earnings of $3.14, and pays a dividend of $1.00, which is expected to
grow at a rate of 10%. If the required return is 15%, what is the current value of the shares
using the Gordon growth model?

A) $38.98.
B) $22.00.
C) $69.08.

Explanation
The Gordon growth model is used to value stocks based on a future series of dividends
that grow at a constant rate.

The current value of the shares is $22.00:

V0 = D0×(1+g) / (r-g) = [$1.00(1 + 0.10)] / (0.15 - 0.10)] = $22.00

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #19 of 135 Question ID: 1472885

An analyst has forecast that Apex Company, which currently pays a dividend of $6.00, will
continue to grow at 8% for the next two years and then at a rate of 5% thereafter. If the
required return is 10%, based on a two-stage model what is the current value of Apex
shares?

A) $133.13.
B) $127.78.
C) $126.24.

Explanation

The current value of Apex shares is $133.13:

V0 = [($6 × 1.08) / 1.10] + [($6 × (1.08)2) / 1.102] + [ ($6 × (1.08)2 × 1.05) / (1.102 ×
(0.10 – 0.05))]

= $133.13

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #20 of 135 Question ID: 1472854

Which of the following dividend discount models (DDMs) is most appropriate for modeling a
mature company?

A) Two-stage DDM.
B) H-model.
C) Gordon growth model.

Explanation
The Gordon growth model assumes that dividends grow at a constant rate forever. It is
most suited for mature companies with low to moderate growth rates and well-
established dividend payout policies.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #21 of 135 Question ID: 1472827

An investor projects that a firm will pay a dividend of $1.00 next year and $1.20 the following
year. At the end of the second year, the expected price of the shares is $22.00. If the
required return is 14%, what is the current value of the firm's shares?

A) $19.34.
B) $18.73.
C) $15.65.

Explanation

The current value of the shares is $18.73:

V0 = $1.00 / 1.14 + $1.20 / (1.14) 2 + $22.00 / (1.14)2 = $18.73

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #22 of 135 Question ID: 1472806

Historical information used to determine the long-term average returns from equity markets
may suffer from survivorship bias, resulting in:

A) deflating the mean return.

B) unpredictable results.
C) inflating the mean return.

Explanation

Survivorship bias refers to the weeding out of underperforming firms, resulting in an

inflated value for the mean return.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #23 of 135 Question ID: 1472915

Given an equity risk premium of 3.5%, a forecasted dividend yield of 2.5% on the market
index and a U.S. government bond yield of 4.5%, what is the consensus long-term earnings
growth estimate?

A) 5.5%.
B) 10.5%.
C) 8.0%.

Explanation

Equity risk premium = forecasted dividend yield + consensus long term earnings growth
rate – long-term government bond yield.

Therefore,

Consensus long term earnings growth rate =

Equity risk premium - forecasted dividend yield + long-term government bond

yield

Consensus long term earnings growth rate = 3.5% - 2.5% + 4.5% = 5.5%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Jakzach Corp. is a U.S.-based company. Exhibits 1–3 present the financial statements, which
are prepared according to U.S. GAAP, and related information for the company. Exhibit 4
presents relevant industry and market data.

Exhibit 1

Jakzach Corp.

Summary Balance Sheets on 31 December (U.S. $ millions)

20x6 20x5

Cash $13.00 $5.87

Accounts receivable 30.00 27.00

Inventory 209.06 189.06

Current assets $252.06 $221.93

Gross fixed assets 474.47 409.47

Accumulated depreciation (154.17) (90.00)

Net fixed assets 320.30 319.47

Total assets $572.36 $541.40

Accounts payable 25.05 $26.05

Notes payable 0.00 0.00

Current portion of long-term debt 0.00 0.00

Current liabilities $25.05 $26.05

Long-term debt 240.00 245.00

Total liabilities $265.05 $271.05

Common stock 160.00 150.00

Retained earnings 147.31 120.35

Total shareholders' equity $307.31 $270.35

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $572.36 $541.40

Exhibit 2

Jakzach Corp.
Summary Income Statement for the Year Ended 31 December 20x6

(U.S. $ millions)

Revenue $300.80

Total operating expenses (173.74)

Operating profit 127.06

Gain on sale 4.00

Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and 131.06

amortization (EDITDA)
(71.17)
Depreciation and amortization

Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) 59.89

Interest (16.80)

Income tax expense (12.93)

Net income 30.16

Exhibit 3

Jakzach Corp.

Common Equity Data for 20x6

Dividends paid (U.S. $ millions) $3.20

Weighted average shares outstanding during 20x6 16,000,000

Dividend per share $0.20

Earnings per share $1.89

Beta 1.80

Note: The dividend payout ratio is expected to be constant.

Exhibit 4

Industry and Market Data

31 December 20x6

Risk-free rate of return 4.00%

Expected rate of return on market index 9.00%

Median industry price/earnings (P/E) ratio 19.90

Expected industry earnings growth rate 12.00%

The portfolio manager of a large mutual fund comments to one of the fund's analysts,
Katrina Preedy:

"We have been considering the purchase of Jakzach Corp. equity shares, so I would like you
to analyze the value of the company. To begin based on Jakzach's past performance; you can
assume that the company will grow at the same rate as the industry."

Question #24 - 27 of 135 Question ID: 1472934

Calculate the value of a share of Jakzach equity on 31 December 20x6, using the Gordon
growth dividend model and the capital asset pricing model.

A) $20.00.
B) $22.40.
C) $211.68.

Explanation
The value of a share of Jakzach equity using the Gordon growth model and the capital
asset pricing model is $22.40.

The value is calculated as follows:

Calculate the required rate of return using the capital asset pricing model.

r = Rf + beta × (E(Rm) – Rf)

Rf = 4.0%

E(Rm) = 9.0%

Beta = 1.8

r = 4.0% + 1.8 × (9.0% – 4.0%)

r = 13.0%

Calculate the share value using the Gordon growth model.

D0 = $0.20

g = 12.0%

r = 13.0%

V0 = (D0 × (1 + g)) / (r – g)

V0 = ($0.20 × (1 + 0.12)) / (0.13 – 0.12)

V0 = $22.40

Professor's Note: You are given the dividend per share ($0.20) in Exhibit 4, but you are
also given total dividends in millions of $ ($3.20). It would have been very easy to mistake
total dividends for dividends per share and arrive at the wrong answer.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #25 - 27 of 135 Question ID: 1472935

Calculate the profit margin component of Jakzach's return on equity for the year 20x6.

A) 8.70%.
B) 10.03%.
C) 19.91%.

Explanation

See answer 3.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #26 - 27 of 135 Question ID: 1472936

Calculate the asset turnover component of Jakzach's return on equity for the year 20x6.
Note: Your calculations should use 20x6 beginning-of-year balance sheet values.

A) 0.53.
B) 0.56.
C) 0.94.

Explanation
The three components of Jakzach's return on equity, using the DuPont model and net
income, are:

Profit margin = 10.03%

Asset turnover = 0.56

Financial leverage = 2.00

The components are calculated as follows:

Net income = $30.16 million

Sales = $300.80 million

Total assets = $541.40 million

Beginning equity = $270.35 million

Profit margin = net income / sales = $30.16 / $300.80 = 10.03%

Asset turnover = sales / total assets = $300.80 / $541.40 = 0.56

Financial leverage = total assets / beginning equity = $541.40 / $270.35 = 2.00

Professor's Note: The default position when calculating ROE is to use opening balance
sheet values in equity analysis. This contrasts with the use of average in financial reporting
analysis. In equity analysis, we are concerned with the return generated on the net assets
in place at the start of the year.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #27 - 27 of 135 Question ID: 1472937

Calculate the sustainable growth rate of Jakzach on 31 December 20x6. Note: Your
calculations should use 20x6 beginning-of-year balance sheet values.

A) 1%.
B) 9%.
C) 10%.
Explanation

The sustainable growth rate of Jakzach is 9.97%, calculated as follows:

g = b × ROE = earnings retention rate × ROE

= (1 – payout ratio) × ROE

= (1 – dividends / net income) × (net income / beginning equity)

= (1 – ($3.20 / $30.16)) × ($30.16 / $270.35)

= 0.0997

g = 9.97%

Using DuPont model results from above and per share data provided in question:

Payout ratio = $0.20 / $1.89= 10.58%

ROE = 10.03% × 0.56 × 2.00 = 11.23%

g = (1 – 0.1058) × 11.23% = 10.04%

g = 10.04%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #28 of 135 Question ID: 1472894

Given that a firm's current dividend is $2.00, the forecasted growth is 7% for the next two
years and 5% thereafter, and the current value of the firm's shares is $54.50, what is the
required rate of return?

A) 10%.
B) 9%.
C) Can’t be determined.

Explanation
The equation to determine the required rate of return is solved through iteration.

$54.50 = $2(1.07) / (1 + r) + $2(1.07)2 / (1 + r)2 + {[$2(1.07)2(1.05)] / (r - 0.05)} / [(1

+ r)2

Through iteration, r = 9%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #29 of 135 Question ID: 1472924

The sustainable growth rate, g, equals:

A) earnings retention rate times the return on equity.

B) pretax margin divided by working capital.
C) dividend payout rate times the return on assets.

Explanation

The formula for sustainable growth is: g = b × ROE, where g = sustainable growth, b = the
earnings retention rate, and ROE equals return on equity.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #30 of 135 Question ID: 1472908

If the risk-free rate is 6%, the equity premium of the chosen index is 4%, and the asset's beta
is 0.8, what is the discount rate to be used in applying the dividend discount model?

A) 10.80%.
B) 7.80%.
C) 9.20%.

Explanation

The discount rate = risk-free rate + beta (return expected on equity market less the risk-
free rate). Here, discount rate = 0.06 + (0.8 × 0.04) = 0.092, or 9.2%.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #31 of 135 Question ID: 1472828

An investor projects that a firm will pay a dividend of $1.25 next year, $1.35 the second year,
and $1.45 the third year. At the end of the third year, she expects the asset to be priced at
$36.50. If the required return is 12%, what is the current value of the shares?

A) $32.78.
B) $29.21.
C) $31.16.

Explanation

The current value of the shares is $29.21: V0 = ($1.25 / 1.12) + ($1.35 / (1.12)2) + ($1.45 /
(1.12)3) + ($36.50 / (1 + 0.12)3) = $29.21

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #32 of 135 Question ID: 1472928

Demonstrate the use of the DuPont analysis of return on equity in conjunction with the
sustainable growth rate expression.

The following statistics are selected from Kyle Star Partners (Kyle) financial statements:

Sales $100 million

Net Income $15 million

Dividends $5 million

Total Assets $150 million

Total Equity $50 million

What is Kyle's sustainable growth rate?

A) 20.0%.
B) 33.3%.
C) 24.5%.

Explanation
SGR

= ROE × [(net income − dividends) / net income]

= (15 million / 50 million) × (15 million − 5 million) / 15 million

= 20.0%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #33 of 135 Question ID: 1472811

The H model will NOT be very useful when:

A) a firm is growing rapidly.

B) a firm has low or no dividends currently.
C) a firm has a constant payout policy.

Explanation

The H model is useful for firms that are growing rapidly but the growth is expected to
decline gradually over time as the firm gets larger and faces increased competition. The
assumption of constant payout ratio makes the model inappropriate for firms that have
low or no dividend currently.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #34 of 135 Question ID: 1480253

The debate over whether to use the arithmetic mean or geometric mean of market returns
for the capital asset pricing model (CAPM):

A) limits its usefulness in estimating the required return of an asset.

B) has little practical effect because they are both very close.
C) was settled by the work of Harry Markowitz in 1972.

Explanation

There are several characteristics of the CAPM that limit its usefulness in determining the
required returns, including the uncertainty whether we should use arithmetic or geometric
means as the appropriate measure of long-term average returns.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #35 of 135 Question ID: 1472872

Which of the following models would be most appropriate for a firm that is expected to grow
at an initial rate of 10%, declining steadily to 6% over a period of five years, and to remain
steady at 6% thereafter?

A) A two-stage model.
B) The Gordon growth model.
C) The H-model.

Explanation

The H-model is the best answer, as it avoids an immediate drop to 6% like a two-stage
would. The Gordon growth model would not be appropriate.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #36 of 135 Question ID: 1472905

Analyst Kelvin Strong is arguing with fellow analyst Martha Hatchett. Strong insists that the
dividend discount model can be used to calculate the required return for a stock, though
only if the growth rate remains constant. Hatchett maintains that while such models are
useful for calculating the value of a stock, they should not be used to calculate required
returns. Who is CORRECT?

Strong Hatchett

A) Incorrect Incorrect

B) Correct Incorrect

C) Incorrect Correct

Explanation

Dividend discount models can be used to calculate required returns, assuming you have
the stock price, dividends, and dividend-growth rates, so Hatchett is wrong. Strong is right
about the fact that a DDM can calculate required returns, but wrong about the growth rate
assumption. Multistage dividend discount models can account for expected changes in the
growth rate.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #37 of 135 Question ID: 1472816

The volatility of equity returns requires us to use data from long time periods to compute
mean returns. One problem that this causes is that:

A) the past is rarely an indication of the future.

B) equity premiums vary over time with perceived risk.
C) inflation alters the value of the past returns.

Explanation

The primary problem with using returns gathered over a long time period is that equity
premiums vary over time with the market's perception of risk and relative risk.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #38 of 135 Question ID: 1472880

Kyle Star Partners is expected to have earnings in year five of $6.00 per share, a dividend
payout ratio of 50%, and a required rate of return of 11%. For year 6 and beyond the
dividend growth rate is expected to fall to 3% in perpetuity. Estimate the terminal value at
the end of year five using the Gordon growth model.

A) $27.27.
B) $37.50.
C) $38.63.

Explanation

The dividend for year 5 is expected to be $3 ($6 times 50%). The dividend for year 6 is then
expected to be $3.00 × 1.03 = $3.09. The terminal value using the Gordon growth model is
therefore:

terminal value = 3.09 / (0.11 − 0.03) = $38.625

P5 = D6 / (k − g)

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.m)

Question #39 of 135 Question ID: 1472904

CAB Inc. just paid a current dividend of $3.00, the forecasted growth is 9%, declining over
four years to a stable 6% thereafter, and the current value of the firm's shares is $50, what is
the required rate of return?

A) 10.5%.
B) 9.8%.
C) 12.7%.

Explanation

The required rate of return is 12.7%.

r = ($3 / $50)[(1 + 0.06) + (4 / 2)(0.09 − 0.06)] + 0.06 = 12.7%

Since the H-model is an approximation model, it is possible to solve for r directly without
iteration.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #40 of 135 Question ID: 1472906

If we increase the required rate of return used in a dividend discount model, the estimate of
value produced by the model will:

A) increase.
B) decrease.
C) remain the same.

Explanation

The required rate of return is used in the denominator of the equation. Increasing this
factor will decrease the resulting value.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #41 of 135 Question ID: 1472832

Jax, Inc., pays a current dividend of $0.52 and is projected to grow at 12%. If the required
rate of return is 11%, what is the current value based on the Gordon growth model?

A) $39.47.
B) unable to determine value using Gordon model.
C) $58.24.

Explanation

The Gordon growth model cannot be used if the growth rate exceeds the required rate of
return.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #42 of 135 Question ID: 1472925

In computing the sustainable growth rate of a firm, the earnings retention rate is equal to:

A) 1 − (dividends / assets).
B) Dividends / required rate of return.
C) 1 − (dividends / earnings).

Explanation

Earnings retention rate = 1 − (dividends / earnings).

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #43 of 135 Question ID: 1472845

What is the value of a fixed-rate perpetual preferred share (par value $100) with a dividend
rate of 11.0% and a required return of 7.5%?

A) $147.
B) $152.
C) $138.

Explanation

The value of the preferred is $147:

V0 = ($100par × 11%) / 7.5% = $146.67

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.d)

Question #44 of 135 Question ID: 1472850

The Gordon growth model is well suited for:

A) biotech firms.
B) utilities.
C) telecom companies.

Explanation

Gordon growth model is best suited to firms that have a stable growth comparable to or
lower than the nominal growth rate in the economy and have well established dividend
payout policies. Utilities, with their regulated prices, stable growth and high dividends, are
particularly well suited for this model.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #45 of 135 Question ID: 1472910

If we know the forecast growth rates for a firm's dividends and the current dividends and
current value, we can determine the:

A) net margin of the firm.

B) sustainable growth rate.
C) required rate of return.

Explanation

Just as we can determine the current value of the shares from the current dividends,
growth forecasts and required return, we can solve for any one of them if we know the
other three factors.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #46 of 135 Question ID: 1472855

Which of the following would NOT be appropriate to value a firm with two expected growth
stages? A(an):

A) H-model.
B) free cash flow model.
C) Gordon growth model.

Explanation

The Gordon growth model would not be appropriate for a firm with two stages of growth
but is useful to value a firm with steady slow growth.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #47 of 135 Question ID: 1472833

The value per share for Burton, Inc. is $32.00 using the Gordon Growth model. The company
paid a dividend of $2.00 last year. The estimates used to calculate the value have changed. If
the new required rate of return is 12.00% and expected growth rate in dividends is 6%, the
value per share will increase by:

A) 4.17%.
B) 9.51%.
C) 10.42%.

Explanation

The value per share using the new estimates is $35.33 = [$2.0(1.06) / 0.12 - 0.06)] and the
percentage increase in the value per share will be 10.42% = [(35.33 - 32.00) / 32.00]
× 100%.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #48 of 135 Question ID: 1472810

If the three-stage dividend discount model (DDM) results in extremely high value, the:

A) growth rate in the stable growth period is probably too high.

B) transition period is too short.
growth rate in the stable growth period is lower than that of gross national
C)
product (GNP).

Explanation
If the three-stage DDM results in an extremely high value, either the growth rate in the
stable growth period is too high or the period of growth (high plus transition) is too long.
To solve these problems, an analyst should use a growth rate closer to GNP growth and
use shorter high-growth and transition periods.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #49 of 135 Question ID: 1472863

The required rate of return for an asset is often difficult to determine, but if we know the
growth prospects and the current earnings of a firm we can determine the implied required
rate of return from the:

A) earnings retention rate.

B) dividend rate.
C) market price.

Explanation

The required rate of return is implicit in the asset's market price and can be determined
with the present value of growth opportunities.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)

Question #50 of 135 Question ID: 1472938

In its most recent quarterly earnings report, Smith Brothers Garden Supplies said it planned
to increase its dividend at an annual rate of 5% for the foreseeable future. Analyst Anton
Spears is using a required return of 9.5% for Smith Brothers stock. Smith Brothers stock
trades for $52.17 per share and earned $3.01 per share over the last 12 months. The
company paid a dividend of $2.15 per share during the last 12-month period, and its
dividend-growth rate for the last five years was 9.2%. Using the Gordon Growth model, the
share price for Smith Brothers stock is most likely:

A) overvalued.
B) undervalued.
C) correctly valued.

Explanation
The Gordon Growth model is as follows:

Value = [dividend × (1 + dividend growth rate)] / [required return − growth rate]

Value = [2.15 × 1.05] / [0.095 − 0.05]

= 2.2575 / [0.095 − 0.05]

= 50.17

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.j)

Question #51 of 135 Question ID: 1472865

A firm has the following characteristics:

Current share price $100.00.

Next year's earnings $3.50.
Next year's dividend $0.75.
Growth rate 11%.
Required return 13%.

Based on this information and the Gordon growth model, what is the firm's justified leading
price to earnings (P/E) ratio?

A) 8.7.
B) 11.3.
C) 10.7.

Explanation

The justified leading P/E is 10.7:

P0 / E1 = (D1 / E1) / (r−g) = ($0.75 / $3.50) / (0.13 – 0.11) = 10.71

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.h)

Question #52 of 135 Question ID: 1472918

Which of the following is least likely a valid approach to determining the appropriate
discount rate for a firm's dividends?

A) Free cash flow to firm (FCFF).

B) Arbitrage pricing theory (APT).
C) Capital asset pricing model (CAPM).

Explanation

FCFF is another discounted cash flow model, not a method to determine required returns.
Each of the other answers is a valid approach to determining an appropriate discount rate.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #53 of 135 Question ID: 1472835

A firm's dividend per share in the most recent year is $4 and is expected to grow at 6% per
year forever. If its shareholders require a return of 14%, the value of the firm's stock (per
share) using the single-stage dividend discount model (DDM) is:

A) $50.00.
B) $28.57.
C) $53.00.

Explanation

The value of the firm's stock is: $4 × [1.06 / (0.14 − 0.06)] = $53.00

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #54 of 135 Question ID: 1472909

In using the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) to determine the appropriate discount rate
for discounted cash flow models (DCFs), the asset's beta is used to determine the amount of:

A) risk-free rate applicable to the time period of the investment.

B) equity premium.
the expected return in addition to the return required by the risk of the
C)
position.

Explanation
Beta measures the correlation between the equity market or index for which the market
risk premium is calculated and the particular asset being valued. Beta is used to
approximate the proportion of the equity risk premium applicable to the asset (in relation
to the market or index used).

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #55 of 135 Question ID: 1472927

Heather Callaway, CFA, is concerned about the accuracy of her valuation of Crimson Gate, a
fast-growing telecommunications-equipment company that her firm rates as a top buy.
Crimson currently trades at $134 per share, and Callaway has put together the following
information about the stock:

Most recent dividend per share $0.55

Growth rate, next 2 years 30%

Growth rate, after 2 years 12%

Trailing P/E 25.6

Financial leverage 3.4

Sales $1198 per share

Asset turnover 11.2

Estimated market rate of return 13.2%

Callaway's employer, Bates Investments, likes to use a company's sustainable growth rate as
a key input to obtaining the required rate of return for the company's stock.

Crimson's sustainable growth rate is closest to:

A) 14.8%.
B) 16.6%.
C) 13.2%.

Explanation
Sustainable growth rate = ROE × retention rate

Earnings per share = price / (P/E) = $134 / 25.6 = $5.23

The retention rate represents the portion of earnings not paid out in dividends. = (5.23 −
0.55) / 5.23 = 0.89 or 89%

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = 5.23 / 1198 × 11.2 × 3.4 = 16.6%

Sustainable growth rate = 89% × 16.6% = 14.8%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #56 of 135 Question ID: 1472818

Multi-stage dividend discount models can be used to estimate the value of shares:

A) only under a limited number of scenarios.

B) only when the growth rate exceeds the required rate of return.
C) under an almost infinite variety of scenarios.

Explanation

Multi-stage dividend discount models are very flexible, allowing their use with an almost
infinite variety of growth scenarios.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #57 of 135 Question ID: 1472860

Tri-coat Paints has a current market value of $41 per share with an earnings of $3.64. What
is the present value of its growth opportunities (PVGO) if the required return is 9%?

A) $0.56.
B) $1.27.
C) $3.92.

Explanation

The PVGO is $0.56:

PVGO = $41 – ($3.64 / 0.09) = $0.56

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)
Question #58 of 135 Question ID: 1472900

Financial models such as the DDM represent a cornerstone of equity valuation from an
academic standpoint. But in the real life, many analysts do not use the DDM. The least likely
reason for this is:

A) the model lacks the flexibility required to model values in the real world.
B) modern research has shown that many of the old standbys do not work.
C) some of the assumptions required are impractical.

Explanation

The DDM requires assumptions that many analysts find impractical. In addition, the model
lacks the flexibility to adapt to changing circumstances. Both of these problems can be
overcome, to a large extent, by using spreadsheet modeling to forecast cash flows and
other variables.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.o)

Question #59 of 135 Question ID: 1472930

If Cantel, Inc., has current earnings of $17, dividends of $3.50, and a sustainable growth rate
of 11%, what is its return on equity (ROE)?

A) 13.85%.
B) 17.64%.
C) 11.91%.

Explanation

Cantel's ROE is 13.85%:

ROE = 11% / [1 – ($3.50/$17.00)] = 13.85%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #60 of 135 Question ID: 1472834

A company reports January 1, 2002, retained earnings of $8,000,000, December 31, 2002,
retained earnings of $10,000,000, and 2002 net income of $5,000,000. The company has
1,000,000 shares outstanding and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 5% per year.
What is the expected dividend at the end of 2003?

A) $3.15.
B) $13.65.
C) $3.00.

Explanation

The first step is to determine 2002 dividends paid as ($8,000,000 + $5,000,000 −

10,000,000) = $3,000,000. The next step is to find the dividend per share ($3,000,000 /
1,000,000 shares) = $3.00 per share. Applying the 5% growth rate, next year's expected
dividend is $3.15, or $3.00 × 1.05.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #61 of 135 Question ID: 1472813

Which of the following dividend discount models has the limitation that a sudden decrease
to the lower growth rate in the second stage may NOT be realistic?

A) Two-stage dividend discount model.

B) H model.
C) Gordon growth model.

Explanation

The two-stage DDM has the limitation that a sudden decrease to the lower growth rate in
the second stage may not be realistic. Further, the model has the difficulty in trying to
estimate the length of the high-growth stage.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #62 of 135 Question ID: 1472857

Zephraim Axelrod, CFA, is trying to determine whether Allegheny Mining is a good
investment. He decides to use the Gordon Growth model to calculate how much dividend
growth shareholders can expect. To that end, he determines the following:

Share price: $18.12.

Dividend: $0.32 per share.
Beta: 1.94.
Industry average estimated returns: 15%.
Risk-free rate: 5.5%.
Equity risk premium: 6.3%

Based only on the information above, the implied dividend growth rate is closest to:

A) 19.89%.
B) 15.68%.
C) 10.27%.

Explanation

We have the price and dividend. We need the required rate of return to use the Gordon
Growth model to calculate implied dividend growth. Using the capital asset pricing model,
the required return = risk-free rate + (beta × equity risk premium) = 17.72%.

Price = [dividend × (1 + dividend growth rate)] / [required return − growth rate]

18.12 = [0.32 × (1 + dividend growth rate)] / [0.1772 − dividend growth rate]

18.12 × [0.1772 − dividend growth rate] = 0.32 + 0.32 × dividend growth rate

3.2112 − 18.12 × dividend growth rate = 0.32 + 0.32 × dividend growth rate

2.8912 = 18.44 × dividend growth rate

1 = 6.3779 × dividend growth rate

Dividend growth rate = 15.68%

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.f)

Question #63 of 135 Question ID: 1472869

In which of the following stages is a firm most likely to distribute the highest proportion of
its earnings in the form of dividends?

A) Initial growth stage.

B) Transition stage.
C) Mature stage.
Explanation

As a firm matures, the forces of competition begin to deny it opportunities to earn greater
than the required return. Faced with this situation, most earnings are distributed to
shareholders as dividends. An alternate way of returning capital is through stock
repurchases.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.k)

Question #64 of 135 Question ID: 1472876

Which of the following models would be most appropriate for a firm that is expected to grow
at 8% for the next three years, and at 6% thereafter?

A) The Gordon growth model.

B) The H-model.
C) A two-stage model.

Explanation

A firm that is expected to experience two growth stages with a fixed rate of growth for
each stage should be evaluated with a two-stage dividend discount model.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #65 of 135 Question ID: 1472858

In its most recent quarterly earnings report, Smith Brothers Garden Supplies said it planned
to increase its dividend at an annual rate of 13% for the foreseeable future. Analyst Clinton
Spears has an annual return target of 15.5% for Smith Brothers stock. He decides to use the
dividend-growth rate to back out another return estimate to test against his. Smith Brothers
stock trades for $55 per share and earned $3.01 per share over the last 12 months. The
company paid a dividend of $2.15 per share during the 12-month period, and its dividend-
growth rate for the last five years was 9.2%.

Using the Gordon Growth model, the required annual return for Smith Brothers stock is
closest to:

A) 17.42%.
B) 19.18%.
C) 13.47%.
Explanation

The Gordon Growth model is as follows:

Price = [dividend × (1 + dividend growth rate)] / [required return − growth rate]

55 = [2.15 × 1.13] / [required return − 0.13]

55 = 2.4295 / [required return − 0.13]

22.6384 = 1 / [required return − 0.13]

[Required return − 0.13] = 0.04417

Required return = 0.17417 = 17.42%

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.f)

Question #66 of 135 Question ID: 1472826

If a stock expects to pay dividends of $2.30 per share next year, what is the value of the
stock if the required rate of return is 12% and the expected growth rate in dividends is 4%?

A) $19.17.
B) $28.75.
C) $29.90.

Explanation

Using the Gordon growth model, the value per share = DPS1 / (r − g) = 2.30 / (0.12 − 0.04) =
$28.75.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #67 of 135 Question ID: 1472836

Jand, Inc., currently pays a dividend of $1.22, which is expected to grow at 5%. If the current
value of Jand's shares based on the Gordon model is $32.03, what is the required rate of
return?

A) 9%.
B) 7%.
C) 8%.

Explanation
The required return is 9%: r = [$1.22(1 + 0.05) / $32.03] + 0.05 = 0.09 or 9%.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #68 of 135 Question ID: 1472879

Methods for estimating the terminal value in a DDM are least likely to include:

A) PVGO.
B) the market multiple approach.
C) the Gordon Growth Model.

Explanation

No matter which dividend discount model we use, we have to estimate a terminal value at
some point in the future. There are two ways to do this: using the Gordon growth model
and the market multiple approach (i.e., a P/E ratio).

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.m)

Question #69 of 135 Question ID: 1472884

A company's stock beta is 0.76, the market return is 10%, and the risk-free rate is 4%. The
stock will pay no dividends for the first two years, followed by a $1 dividend and $2 dividend,
respectively. An investor expects to sell the stock for $10 at the end of four years. What price
is an investor willing to pay for this stock?

A) $11.03.
B) $9.42.
C) $10.16.

Explanation
The first step is to determine the required rate of return as 4% + [(10% – 4%) × 0.76] or
8.56% per year. The second step is to determine the present value of all future expected
cash flows, including the terminal $10 stock price, discounted back four years to today.
The solution is shown below.

Year CF
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 2
4 10

0/1.0856 + 0/(1.0856)2 + 1/(1.0856)3 + (2 + 10)/(1.0856)4 = $9.42

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #70 of 135 Question ID: 1472902

Which of the following actions will be least helpful for an analyst attempting to improve the
predictive power of his scenario analysis?

A) Using a spreadsheet rather than a calculator.

B) Limiting deviations from the core model.
C) Acquiring more precise inputs.

Explanation

The whole point of scenario analysis is the flexibility to modify the inputs to see how
changes in one factor affect others. In order to perform scenario analysis, you must
deviate from the core model. Increased precision on the inputs will increase the predictive
power of almost any model. Spreadsheets reduce the likelihood of computational
inaccuracies and allow analysts to more easily modify models to reflect many scenarios.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.o)

Bernadine Nutting has just completed several rounds of job interviews with the valuation
group, Ancis Associates. The final hurdle before the firm makes her an offer is an interview
with Greg Ancis, CFA, the founder and senior partner of the group. He takes pride in
interviewing all potential associates himself once they have made it through the earlier
rounds of interviews, and puts candidates through a grueling series of tests. As soon as
Nutting enters his office, Ancis tries to overwhelm her with financial information on a variety
of firms, including Turbo Financial Services, Aultman Construction, and Reality Productions.
Ancis then moves on to Turbo Financial Services. Ancis has been following Turbo for quite
some time because of its impressive earnings growth. Earnings per share have grown at a
compound annual rate of 19% over the past six years, pushing earnings to $10 per share in
the year just ended. He considers this growth rate very high for a firm with a cost of equity
of 14%, and a weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of only 9%. He's especially impressed
that the firm can achieve these growth rates while still maintaining a constant dividend
payout ratio of 40%, which he expects the firm to continue indefinitely. With a market value
of $55.18 per share, Ancis considers Turbo a strong buy.

Ancis believes that Turbo will have one more year of strong earnings growth, with EPS rising
by 20% in the coming year. He then expects EPS growth to fall 5 percentage points per year
for each of the following two years, and achieve its long-term sustainable growth rate of 5%
beginning in year four.

Finally, Ancis turns to Aultman Construction, trading at $22 per share (with current EPS of
$2.50 and a required return of 18%), and Reality Productions, which currently trades at $30
per share. Reality Production's current dividend is $1.50, but the historical dividend growth
rate has been a stable 10%. Dividend growth is expected to decline linearly over six years to
5%, and then remain at 5% indefinitely.

Question #71 - 74 of 135 Question ID: 1472890

Which of the following statements is least accurate? The two-stage DDM is most suited for
analyzing firms that:

A) are in an industry with low barriers to entry.

B) are expected to grow at a normalized rate after a fixed period of time.
C) own patents for a very profitable product.

Explanation

The two-stage DDM is well suited to firms that have high growth and are expected to
maintain it for a specific period. The assumption that the growth rate drops sharply from
high-growth in the initial phase to a stable rate makes this model appropriate for firms
that have a competitive advantage, such as a patent, that is expected to exist for a fixed
period of time. The model is not useful in analyzing a firm that is in an industry with low
barriers to entry. Low barriers to entry are likely to result in increased competition.
Therefore, the length of the initial phase of the growth period is indeterminate and
probably uneven.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #72 - 74 of 135 Question ID: 1472891

What is the implied required rate of return for Reality Productions?

A) 12.50%.
B) 11.00%.
C) 11.75%.

Explanation

The H-model applies to firms where the dividend growth rate is expected to decline
linearly over the high-growth stage until it reaches its long-run average growth rate. This
most closely matches the anticipated pattern of growth for Reality Productions.

The H-model can be rewritten in terms of r and used to solve for r given the other model
inputs:

r = D0 / P0 × [(1 + gL) × [H × (gS - gL)] + gL

Here, r = 1.5 / 30 × [(1 + 0.05) + [(6.0 / 2) × (0.10 − 0.05)] + 0.05 = 0.11

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #73 - 74 of 135 Question ID: 1472892

Based upon its current market value, what is the implied long-term sustainable growth rate
of Turbo Financial Advisors?

A) 4.0%.
B) 0.3%.
C) 19.0%.

Explanation
The implied long-term rate is the rate that will cause the present value of expected
dividends to equal its current market value. Since Ancis provides specific growth rates for
Turbo over the next three years, we can use a multi-stage dividend discount model and
solve for the long-term growth rate that makes the present value equal to the current
market value.

First, we calculate Turbo's expected dividends.

D0 = $10.00 current EPS times the dividend payout ratio of 40%

D0 = $4.00 dividend per share in year 0.

Note that the 19% historical dividend growth rate is irrelevant to the current value of the
firm. Since the dividend payout ratio is expected to remain constant at 40%, we can use
the expected growth rate in earnings to estimate future dividends. EPS growth is forecast
at 20% in year 1, 15% in year 2, and 10% in year 3.

Multiplying each year's expected dividend times the relevant forecast growth rate, we
calculate:

D1 = ($4.00 dividend in year 0) × (1.20) = $4.80

D2 = ($4.80 dividend in year 1) × (1.15) = $5.52

D3 = ($5.52 dividend in year 2) × (1.10) = $6.07

Discounting these back to their present value in year 0 using the cost of equity (the WACC
is irrelevant), we find:

Present Value (D1 + D2 + D3) = ($4.80 / 1.141) + ($5.52 / 1.142) + ($6.07 / 1.143)

= $4.21 + $4.25 + $4.10

= $12.56

Thus, we know that $12.56 of the current $55.18 market value represents the present
value of the expected dividends in years 1, 2 and 3. Therefore, the present value of the
firm's dividends for years 4 and beyond must equal ($55.18 - $12.56) = $42.62.

Since the present value of the firm's dividends beginning in year 4 equals $42.62, the
future value in year four will equal ($42.62 × 1.143) = $63.14.

Now that we know the value in year 4 of the future stream of steady-growth dividends, we
can solve for the growth rate using the Gordon Growth Model:

P3 = [($6.07)(1 + x)] / (0.14 − x ) = $63.14

63.14 (0.14 − x) = 6.07 (1+x)

8.84 − 63.14x = 6.07 + 6.07x

2.77 = 69.21x

x = 0.04

The long-term growth rate that makes Turbo fairly valued is 4% per year.

We can check our calculation by plugging the 4% growth rate we just solved for into the
Gordon Growth Model and then plugging that result into the basic multi-stage dividend
discount model:
P3 = [($6.07)(1 + 0.04)] / (0.14 − 0.04)

P3 = 6.313 / (.10)

P3 = 63.13

(Note that this value varies from the previous calculation by 0.01 because of rounding
error.)

P0 = ($4.80 / 1.141) + ($5.52 / 1.142) + ($6.07 / 1.143) + ($63.13 / 1.143) = $55.18, which is
the current market value. At a 4% growth rate, Turbo is fairly valued.

Note that on the exam, it may be faster to plug each growth rate into the Gordon Growth
Model and then plug each of those terminal values into the basic multi-stage formula than
to solve for the growth rate. This trial and error method is especially effective if you start
with the "middle" growth rate and then decide which value to test next depending on the
results of the first calculation. For example, if the first growth rate gives a value for the
firm that is too high, you can eliminate all the higher growth rates and try the next lower
one.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #74 - 74 of 135 Question ID: 1472893

What is the present value of Aultman's future investment opportunities as a percentage of

the market price?

A) 13.9%.
B) 8.1%.
C) 36.9%.

Explanation
The present value of the company's future investment opportunities is also known as
PVGO, which can be calculated using the formula: Value = (E / r) + PVGO

where

E = earnings per share

r = required return

(E / r) is the value of the assets in place

Here, $22 = ($2.5 / 0.18) + PVGO

PVGO = $8.11

The PVGO as a percentage of the market price equals ($8.11 / $22.00) = 36.9%.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

UC Inc. is a high-tech company that currently pays a dividend of $2.00 per share. UC's
expected growth rate is 5%. The risk-free rate is 3% and market return is 9%.

Question #75 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472839

What is the beta implied by a market price of $40.38?

A) 1.02.
B) 1.20.
C) 1.16.

Explanation

40.38 = 2.10 / (r − 0.05)

r = 2.10 / 40.38 + 0.05 = 0.1020

From CAPM:
r = 0.03 + b(0.09 − 0.03)

0.1020 = 0.03 + 0.06b

b = 1.20

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #76 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472840

Based on CAPM and the Gordon growth model, what is the value of the UC stock if the firm's
retention ratio is 0.7, its tax rate is 40%, and its beta is 1.12?

A) $9.72.
B) $20.79.
C) $44.49.

Explanation

From CAPM:
r = 0.03 + (0.09 − 0.03)

r = 0.03 + 1.12(0.06)

r = 0.0972

V0 = D1 / (r − g)

= 2.00(1 + 0.05) / (0.0972 − 0.05)

= 2.10 / 0.0472 = $44.49

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #77 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472841

Assuming a beta of 1.12, if UC is expected to have a growth rate of 10% for the first 3 years
and 5% thereafter, what is the value of UC stock?

A) $53.81.
B) $46.89.
C) $50.87.

Explanation
 D1 = 2(1.10) = 2.20

D2 = 2.20(1.10) = 2.42

D3 = 2.42(1.10) = 2.662

D4 = 2.662(1.05) = 2.795

V3 = D4 / (r − g)

= (2.795) / (0.0972 − 0.05)

= 59.22

V0 = [2.20 / 1.0972] + [2.42 / (1.0972)2] + [(2.662 + 59.22) / (1.0972)3]

= $50.87

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #78 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472842

Assuming a beta of 1.12, if UC's growth rate is 10% initially and is expected to decline
steadily to a stable rate of 5% over the next three years, what is the price of UC stock?

A) $47.82.
B) $46.61.
C) $47.67.

Explanation

Given: D0 = 2.00; gL = 0.05; gS = 0.10; H = (3 / 2) = 1.50; and r = 0.0972

V0 = {[D0(1 + gL)] + [D0 × H × (gS − gL)]} / (r − gL)

V0 = [2(1.05) + 2(1.50)(0.10 − 0.05)] / (0.0972 − 0.05)

= 2.25 / 0.0472 = $47.67

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #79 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472843

The discounted dividend approach that we have used to value UC Inc. is most appropriate
for valuing dividend-paying stocks in which:
A) free cash flow is negative.
B) the investor takes a minority ownership perspective.
C) dividends differ substantially from FCFE.

Explanation

The discounted dividend approach is most appropriate for valuing dividend-paying stocks
in a company that has an rational dividend policy with a clear relationship to the
company's profitability, and where the investor takes a minority ownership (non-control)
perspective. A free cash flow approach may be appropriate when a company's dividends
differ significantly from FCFE. The residual income approach is most useful when a
company's free cash flow is negative.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #80 - 80 of 135 Question ID: 1472844

UC Inc. had earnings of $3.00/share last year and a justified trailing P/E of 15.0. Is the stock
currently overvalued, undervalued, or fairly valued if we consider a security trading within a
band of ±10 percent of intrinsic value to be within a "fair value range"? At a market price of
$40.38, UC Inc. is best described as:

A) undervalued.
B) fairly valued.
C) overvalued.

Explanation

The justified trailing P/E or P0/E0 is V0/E0, where V0 is the fair value based on the stock's
fundamentals. The justified trailing P/E is given as 15, so the fair value V0 based on an E0
of $3.00 can be computed as 15 × 3.00 = $45.00. Thus at a market price of $40.38, UC Inc.
is undervalued by slightly more than 10%.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #81 of 135 Question ID: 1472883

An analyst for a small European investment bank is interested in valuing stocks by
calculating the present value of its future dividends. He has compiled the following financial
data for Ski, Inc.:

Earnings per Share (EPS)

Year 0 $4.00

Year 1 $6.00

Year 2 $9.00

Year 3 $13.50

Note: Shareholders of Ski, Inc., require a 20% return on their investment in the high growth
stage compared to 12% in the stable growth stage. The dividend payout ratio of Ski, Inc., is
expected to be 40% for the next three years. After year 3, the dividend payout ratio is
expected to increase to 80% and the expected earnings growth will be 2%. Using the
information contained in the table, what is the value of Ski, Inc.'s, stock?

A) $71.38.
B) $39.50.
C) $43.04.

Explanation

The dividends in the next four years are:

Year 1: 6 × 0.4 = 2.4

Year 2: 9 × 0.4 = 3.6

Year 3: 13.5 × 0.4 = 5.4

Year 4: (13.5 × 1.02) × 0.8 = 11.016

The terminal value of the firm (in year 3) is 11.016 / (0.12 − 0.02) = 110.16. Value per share
= 2.4 / (1.2)1 + 3.6 / (1.2)2+ 5.4 / (1.2)3 + 110.16 / (1.2)3 = $71.38.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #82 of 135 Question ID: 1472861

Ambiance Company has a current market price of $42, a current dividend of $1.25 and a
required rate of return of 12%. All earnings are paid out as dividends. What is the present
value of Ambiance's growth opportunities (PVGO)?
A) $38.85.
B) $31.58.
C) $16.71.

Explanation

The PVGO is $31.58:

PVGO = $42 – ($1.25 / 0.12) = $31.58

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)

Question #83 of 135 Question ID: 1472862

Obsidian Glass Company has current earnings of $2.22, a required return of 8%, and the
present value of growth opportunities (PVGO) of $8.72. What is the current value of
Obsidian's shares?

A) $36.47.
B) $27.75.
C) $10.94.

Explanation

The current value is $36.47. V0 = ($2.22 / 0.08) + $8.72 = $36.47

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)

Question #84 of 135 Question ID: 1472917

A firm pays a current dividend of $1.00 which is expected to grow at a rate of 5% indefinitely.
If current value of the firm's shares is $35.00, what is the required return applicable to the
investment based on the Gordon dividend discount model (DDM)?

A) 7.86%.
B) 8.25%.
C) 8.00%.

Explanation
The Gordon DDM uses the dividend for the period (t + 1) which would be $1.05.

$35 = $1.05 / (required return – 0.05)

Required return = 0.08 or 8.00%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #85 of 135 Question ID: 1472903

Recent surveys of analysts report long-term earnings growth estimates as 5.5% and a
forecasted dividend yield of 2.0% on the market index. At the time of the survey, the 20-year
U.S. government bond yielded 4.8%. According to the Gordon growth model, what is the
equity risk premium?

A) 2.7%.
B) 0.4%.
C) 7.5%.

Explanation

Equity risk premium = 2.0% + 5.5% – 4.8% = 2.7%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #86 of 135 Question ID: 1472808

If an asset was fairly priced from an investor's point of view, the holding period return (HPR)
would be:

A) lower than the required return.

B) the same as the required return.
C) equal to the alpha returns.

Explanation

A fairly priced asset would be one that has an expected HPR just equal to the investor's
required return.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Flyaweight Foods is a vertically integrated producer and distributor of low-calorie food
products operating on a consumer club model. They have enjoyed rapid growth in the
southwest United States during their 5-year history and are planning rapid expansion
throughout the rest of the country. To fund their expansion, they are soliciting investments
from a variety of venture capital groups.

One of the groups considering a bid for Flyaweight is Angelcap Investors, a private equity
fund run by Harry Moskowitz. Angelcap is interested in acquiring a 10% interest in
Flyaweight. Moskowitz' partner, Bill Sharpless, runs the group doing due diligence on
Flyaweight. He provides Moskowitz with financial data on the firm:

Table 1: Flyaweight Foods Historical Data (Dollars per share)

FY1 FY2 FY3 FY4 FY5

Sales per share 4.25 5.60 6.40 7.35 8.05

EPS 1.20 1.85 2.30 2.79 3.10

Dividends 0 0 0.10 0.20 0.35

Free Cash Flow –2.50 –2.10 –1.85 –1.60 –1.25

They ask Merle Muller, an analyst at the firm, to calculate an appropriate required return on
Flyaweight. Muller collects the following market consensus information:

Table 2: Current Market Conditions (Consensus estimates)

Expected 5-year EPS growth 8.0%

Expected 1-year Dividend yield 2.2%

Current Treasury yield (10-year note) 4.8%

Food industry beta (specialty segment) 0.95

Sharpless argues in favor of using the Gordon Growth Model (GGM). "We know what the
company growth rate is, we know what the dividend is, and we can decide what our required
rate of return is. The GGM will give us the most accurate valuation because it uses the inputs
we can measure most accurately." Moskowitz points out, "An H-model would be more
appropriate because it assumes a linear slowdown in growth to a constant rate in
perpetuity."

While Sharpless and Moskowitz debate the appropriate valuation approach, Muller prepares
forecasts for Flyaweight.

Table 3: Forecast Values for Flyaweight

 Forecast

Average total liabilities per share $14.40

Average owners' equity per share $12.70

Profit margin 29%

Sales per share $10.70

Dividend payout ratio 10%

Question #87 - 90 of 135 Question ID: 1586158

Judging by the data in Table 1, the most appropriate method for valuing Flyaweight would
be:

A) the DDM because the firm has a history of dividend growth.

residual income because the firm is likely to have high capital demands and
B)
negative cash flow for the foreseeable future.
C) justified P/E because it is a high-growth company.

Explanation

A residual income model is appropriate for firms with long term negative free cash flow
due to high capital demands. A DDM would not be appropriate since the dividend payout
ratio is fluctuating widely. Justified P/E is not a preferred valuation method for high-growth
companies because it assumes a constant growth rate in perpetuity.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #88 - 90 of 135 Question ID: 1586159

With respect to their statements about the use of the GGM and the H-model:

A) only Moskowitz is correct.

B) only Sharpless is correct.
C) both are correct.

Explanation
Moskowitz is correct that an H-model assumes a linear slowdown in growth until a
constant growth rate is achieved. Sharpless is incorrect that the GGM would be an
appropriate technique for valuing Flyaweight because the GGM assumes a constant rate of
growth in perpetuity and Flyaweight has not yet reached a constant growth rate.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #89 - 90 of 135 Question ID: 1586160

Which of the following is least likely to be a characteristic of a company in the initial growth
phase?

A) Low dividend payout ratio.

B) High profit margin.
C) Return on equity equal to the required rate of return.

Explanation

Companies in the initial growth phase tend to have a return on equity higher than the
required rate of return, along with high profit margins and a low dividend payout.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #90 - 90 of 135 Question ID: 1586161

Based on the forecast data in Table 3, Flyaweight's sustainable growth rate (SGR) is closest to
which value? If asset turnover were to rise from the forecast level, what would be the impact
on SGR?

SGR Impact on SGR

A) 22% Increase

B) 22% Decline

C) 24% Increase

Explanation
Note that total assets for the firm must equal total liabilities plus owners' equity, so assets
are ($14.40 + $12.70) = $27.10.

Thus the Return on Equity (ROE) of the firm equals:

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (0.29) × ($10.70 / $27.10) × ($27.10 / $12.70)

ROE = 0.244 = 24.4%

ROE will rise as asset turnover rises.

The SGR of the firm equals:

SGR = retention rate × ROE

SGR = (1 – 0.10) × 0.244

SGR = 0.90 × 0.244

SGR = 0.22

The SGR of the firm is approximately 22%.

SGR will increase as rising asset turnover increases ROE.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #91 of 135 Question ID: 1472830

IAM, Inc. has a current stock price of $40.00 and expects to pay a dividend in one year of
$1.80. The dividend is expected to grow at a constant rate of 6% annually. IAM has a beta of
0.95, the market is expected to return 11%, and the risk-free rate of interest is 4%. The
expected stock price two years from today is closest to:

A) $43.94.
B) $43.49.
C) $41.03.

Explanation

CAPM : r = 0.04 + [0.95 × (0.11 − 0.04)] = 0.1065

2 2
D3 = D1 × (1 + g) = $1.80 × 1.06 = $2.0225

D3 $2.0225
P2 = = = $43.49
r − g 0.1065 − 0.06

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #92 of 135 Question ID: 1472921

If a firm has a return on equity of 15%, a current dividend of $1.00, and a sustainable growth
rate of 9%, what are the firm's current earnings?

A) $1.75.
B) $2.50.
C) $1.50.

Explanation

The earnings can be determined by solving for earnings in the sustainable growth formula:

9% = [1 − ($1 / $Earnings)] × 0.15 or $1 / 0.4 = $Earnings = $2.50

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #93 of 135 Question ID: 1472920

Dynamite, Inc., has current earnings of $26, current dividend of $2, and a returned on equity
of 18%. What is its sustainable growth?

A) 14.99%.
B) 16.62%.
C) 13.37%.

Explanation

g = [1 − ($2 / $26)]0.18 = 16.62%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #94 of 135 Question ID: 1472825

An analyst has compiled the following financial data for ABC, Inc.

ABC, Inc. Valuation Scenarios

Item Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4

Year 0 Dividends
$1.50 $1.50 $1.50 $1.50
per Share

Long-term
Treasury Bond 4.0% 4.0% 5.0% 5.0%
Rate

Expected Return
12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0%
on the S&P 500

Beta 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Year 1, g=20%

Year 2, g=18%

Years 1-3, Year 3, g=16%

g (growth rate in g=12.0% Year 4, g=9%

0.0% 3.0%
dividends) After Year 3, Year 5, g=8%
g=3.0%
Year 6, g=7%

After Year 6,
g=4%

What is the value of ABC, Inc.'s stock price using the assumptions contained in Scenario 4?

A) $22.22.
B) $18.52.
C) $26.66.

Explanation
The required rate of return is (r) = 0.05 + 1.4(0.12 − 0.05) = 0.148

The future dividends are predicted as the following:

Year Dividend
0 1.50
1 1.50 × 1.2 = 1.80
2 1.80 × 1.18 =2.124
3 2.124 × 1.16 = 2.464
4 2.464 × 1.09 = 2.686
5 2.686 × 1.08 = 2.900
6 2.901 × 1.07 = 3.103
7 3.103 × 1.04 = 3.227

Now discount the dividend stream to get the value per share. Use the Gordon growth
model to discount the constant growth after period 6. Value per share = (1.8 / 1.148) +
(2.124 / 1.1482) + (2.464 / 1.1483) + (2.686 / 1.1484) + (2.900 / 1.1485) + (3.103 / 1.1486) +
(3.227 / 1.1486(0.148 − 0.04)) = 22.22.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #95 of 135 Question ID: 1472846

A $100 par, perpetual preferred share pays a fixed dividend of 5.0%. If the required rate of
return is 6.5%, what is the current value of the shares?

A) $88.64.
B) $76.92.
C) $100.00.

Explanation

The current value of the shares is $76.92:

V0 = ($100 × 0.05) / 0.065 = $76.92

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.d)

Question #96 of 135 Question ID: 1472870

Most firms follow a pattern of growth that includes several stages. The second stage is most
likely to be referred to as the:

A) decline stage.
B) maturity stage.
C) transitional stage.

Explanation

The second stage is often referred to as the transitional stage. During the transitional
stage, the firm's growth begins to slow as competitive forces build.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.k)

Question #97 of 135 Question ID: 1472809

Free cash flow to equity models (FCFE) are most appropriate when estimating the value of
the firm:

A) only for non-dividend paying firms.

B) to creditors of the firm.
C) to equity holders.

Explanation

FCFE models attempt to estimate the value of the firm to equity holders. The models take
in to account future cash flows due to others, including debt and taxes, and amounts
required for reinvestment to continue the firm's operations.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #98 of 135 Question ID: 1472867

If an asset's beta is 0.8, the expected return on the equity market is 10%, the retention ratio
is 0.7, the dividend growth rate is 5%, and the appropriate discount rate for the Gordon
model is 9%, the risk-free rate must be closest to:

A) 5.0%.
B) 2.5%.
C) 3.8%.
Explanation

Required return = risk-free rate + beta (expected equity market return – risk-free rate)

9% = risk-free rate + 0.8(0.10 – risk-free rate)

9% = 0.08 + 0.2(risk-free rate)

1% / 0.2 = risk-free rate = 0.05 or 5%

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.h)

Question #99 of 135 Question ID: 1472817

Which of the following is least likely a limitation of the two-stage dividend discount model
(DDM)?

A) most of the value is due to the terminal value.

B) Terminal value estimate is most sensitive to estimates of future dividends.
C) the length of the high-growth stage is difficult to measure.

Explanation

The Terminal value in two-stage DDM is most sensitive to estimates of growth and
required rate of return.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #100 of 135 Question ID: 1472932

The current market price per share for High-on-the-Hog, Inc. is $52.50, and an analyst is
using the Gordon Growth model to determine whether this is a fair price. The company paid
a dividend of $3.00 last year on earnings of $4.50 a share. If the required rate of return is
11.00% and the expected grown rate in earnings and in dividends is 5%, the current market
price is most likely:

A) correctly valued.
B) undervalued.
C) overvalued.

Explanation
The value per share using the estimates is $52.50 = [$3.00(1.05) / 0.11 − 0.05)].

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.j)

Question #101 of 135 Question ID: 1472847

What is the value of a fixed-rate perpetual preferred share (par value $100) with a dividend
rate of 7.0% and a required return of 9.0%?

A) $56.
B) $71.
C) $78.

Explanation

The value of the preferred is $78:

V0 = ($100par × 7%) / 9% = $77.78

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.d)

Question #102 of 135 Question ID: 1472888

James Malone, CFA, covers GNTX stock, which is currently trading at $45.00 and just paid a
dividend of $1.40. Malone expects the dividend growth rate to decline linearly over the next
six years from 25% in the short run to 6% in the long run. Malone estimates the required
return on GNTX to be 13%. Using the H-model, the value of GNTX is closest to:

A) $33.40.
B) $32.60.
C) $17.55.

Explanation

The estimated value of GNTX using the H-model is calculated as follows:

V0 = [ D0 × (1+gL) / (r −gL) ] + [ D0 × H × (gS−gL) / (r−gL) ]

V0 = [ ($1.40×1.06) / (0.13-0.06) ] + [ $1.40×(6/2)×(0.25-0.06) / (0.13-0.06) ] =

$32.60

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #103 of 135 Question ID: 1472875

What is the difference between a standard two-stage growth model and the H-model?

In the standard two-stage model, a fixed rate of growth is assumed for each
A) stage, while the H-model assumes a linearly declining rate of growth in one
stage.
The H-model assumes that earnings will dip in the middle of each stage and
B)
return to the previous rate by the period's end.
The H-model assumes a terminal value, while the standard two-stage model
C)
does not.

Explanation

The H-model provides an estimate of the firm's value based on the assumption that the
rate of growth will change linearly over the initial stage.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #104 of 135 Question ID: 1472914

If the expected return on the equity market is 10% and the risk-free rate is 3%, the required
return on an asset with beta of 0.6 is closest to:

A) 7.2%.
B) 6.0%.
C) 9.0%.

Explanation

The required return on an asset is equal to the current expected risk-free return, plus the
asset's beta times the difference between the expected return on the equity market and
the risk-free rate. Required return = 0.03 + 0.6(0.10 - 0.03) = 0.072 or 7.2%.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #105 of 135 Question ID: 1472931

In the five-part DuPont model ROE = (NI/EBT)(EBT/EBIT)(EBIT/sales)(sales/assets)
(assets/equity), the product of the first three terms is:

A) gross profit margin.

B) net profit margin.
C) operating profit margin.

Explanation

(NI/EBT)(EBT/EBIT)(EBIT/sales) = (NI/sales) = net profit margin.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #106 of 135 Question ID: 1472871

In what stage of growth would a firm most likely NOT pay dividends?

A) Declining stage.
B) Transition stage.
C) Initial growth stage.

Explanation

During the initial growth stage, the firm is able to exploit opportunities to earn greater
than the required return. During this stage, earnings are reinvested in the growth
opportunities rather than returned to the investors.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.k)

Question #107 of 135 Question ID: 1472912

An investor computes the current value of a firm's shares to be $34.34, based on an

expected dividend of $2.80 in one year and an expected price of the share in one year to be
$36.00. What is the investor's required rate of return on this investment?

A) 10%.
B) 13%.
C) 11%.

Explanation
The required return = [($36.00 + $2.80) / $34.34 ] – 1 = 0.13 or 13%.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Julie Davidson, CFA, has recently been hired by a well-respected hedge fund manager in New
York as an investment analyst. Davidson's responsibilities in her new position include
presenting investment recommendations to her supervisor, who is a principal in the firm.
Davidson's previous position was as a junior analyst at a regional money management firm.
In order to prepare for her new position, her supervisor has asked Davidson to spend the
next week evaluating the fund's investment policy and current portfolio holdings. At the end
of the week, she is to make at least one new investment recommendation based upon her
evaluation of the fund's current portfolio. Upon examination of the fund's holdings,
Davidson determines that the domestic growth stock sector is currently underrepresented in
the portfolio. The fund has stated to its investors that it will aggressively pursue
opportunities in this sector, but due to recent profit-taking, the portfolio needs some
rebalancing to increase its exposure to this sector. She decides to search for a suitable stock
in the pharmaceuticals industry, which, she believes, may be able to provide an above
average return for the hedge fund while maintaining the fund's stated risk tolerance
parameters.

Davidson has narrowed her search down to two companies, and is comparing them to
determine which is the more appropriate recommendation. One of the prospects is Samson
Corporation, a mid-sized pharmaceuticals corporation that, through a series of acquisitions
over the past five years, has captured a large segment of the flu vaccine market. Samson
financed the acquisitions largely through the issuance of corporate debt. The company's
stock had performed steadily for many years until the acquisitions, at which point both
earnings and dividends accelerated rapidly. Davidson wants to determine what impact any
additional acquisitions will have on Samson's future earnings potential and stock
performance.

The other prospect is Wellborn Products, a manufacturer of a variety of over-the-counter

pediatric products. Wellborn is a relatively new player in this segment of the market, but
industry insiders have confidence in the proven track record of the company's upper
management who came from another firm that is a major participant in the industry. The
market cap of Wellborn is much smaller than Samson's, and the company differs from
Samson because it has grown internally rather than through the acquisition of its
competitors. Wellborn currently has no long-term debt outstanding. While the firm does not
pay a dividend, it has recently declared that it intends to begin paying one at the end of the
current calendar year.

Select financial information (year-end 2005) for Samson and Wellborn is outlined below:
Samson:

Current Price: $36.00

Sales: $75,000,000

Net Income: $5,700,000

Assets: $135,000,000

Liabilities: $95,000,000

Equity: $60,000,000

Wellborn:

Current Price: $21.25

Dividends expected to be received at the end of 2006: $1.25

Dividends expected to be received at the end of 2007: $1.45

Price expected at year-end 2007: $27.50

Required return on equity: 9.50%

Risk-free rate: 3.75%

Other financial information:

One-year forecasted dividend yield on market index: 1.75%

Consensus long-term earnings growth rate: 5.25%

Short-term government bill rate: 3.75%

Medium-term government note rate: 4.00%

Long-term government bond rate: 4.25%

It is the beginning of 2006, and Davidson wants use the above data to identify which will
have the greatest expected returns. She must determine which valuation model(s) is most
appropriate for these two securities. Also, Davidson must forecast sustainable growth rates
for each of the companies to assess whether or not they would fit within the fund's
investment parameters.

Question #108 - 111 of 135 Question ID: 1472820

Using the Gordon growth model (GGM), what is the equity risk premium?
A) 2.75%.
B) 3.25%.
C) 5.50%.

Explanation

The GGM calculates the risk premium using forward-looking or expectational data. The
equity risk premium is estimated as the one-year forecasted dividend yield on market
index, plus the consensus long-term earnings growth rate, minus the long-term
government bond yield. Note that because equities are assumed to have a long duration,
the long-term government bond yield serves as the proxy for the risk-free rate.

Equity risk premium = 1.75% + 5.25% − 4.25% = 2.75%

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #109 - 111 of 135 Question ID: 1472821

Davidson needs to determine if the shares of Wellborn are currently undervalued or

overvalued in the market relative to the shares' fundamental value. The estimated fair value
of Wellborn shares, using a two-period dividend discount model (DDM), is:

A) $27.69.
B) $27.58.
C) $25.29.

Explanation

The value of Wellborn using a two-period DDM is:

($1.25 / 1.095) + (($1.45 + $27.50) / 1.0952) = $25.29

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #110 - 111 of 135 Question ID: 1472822

As a part of her analysis, Davidson needs to calculate return on equity for both potential
investments. What is last year's return on equity (ROE) for Samson shares?

A) 6.5%.
B) 3.5%.
C) 9.5%.

Explanation

ROE can be calculated using the DuPont formula, which is:

ROE = Net Income / Stockholder's Equity

ROE = (net income / sales) × (sales / total assets) × (total assets / stockholders'
equity)

Therefore: ROE = (5,700,000 / 75,000,000) × (75,000,000 / 135,000,000) × (135,000,000 /

60,000,000) = (0.076) × (0.556) × (2.25) = 0.095 = 9.5%.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #111 - 111 of 135 Question ID: 1472823

Davidson determines that over the past three years, Samson has maintained an average net
profit margin of 8 percent, a total asset turnover of 1.6, and a leverage ratio (equity
multiplier) of 1.39. Assuming Samson continues to distribute 35 percent of its earnings as
dividends, Samson's estimated sustainable growth rate (SGR) is:

A) 6.2%.
B) 17.8%.
C) 11.6%.

Explanation

Utilizing the PRAT model, where SGR is a function of profit margin (P), the retention rate
(R), asset turnover (A) and financial leverage (T):

g=P×R×A×T

g = 0.08 × (1 − 0.35) × 1.6 × 1.39 = 0.116 = 11.6%.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #112 of 135 Question ID: 1472824

Deployment Specialists pays a current (annual) dividend of $1.00 and is expected to grow at
20% for two years and then at 4% thereafter. If the required return for Deployment
Specialists is 8.5%, the current value of Deployment Specialists is closest to:

A) $30.60.
B) $25.39.
C) $33.28.

Explanation

First estimate the amount of each of the next two dividends and the terminal value. The
current value is the sum of the present value of these cash flows, discounted at 8.5%.

1.20 1.04(1.44)
1.44
V0 = + +
1.085 2 2
(1.085) (0.085−0.04)(1.085)

V0 = 30.60

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #113 of 135 Question ID: 1472837

Suppose the equity required rate of return is 10%, the dividend just paid is $1.00 and
dividends are expected to grow at an annual rate of 6% forever. What is the expected price
at the end of year 2?

A) $29.78.
B) $28.09.
C) $27.07.

Explanation

The terminal value is $29.78, and that is the price an investor should be willing to pay at
the end of year 2. The correct answer is shown below.

Year Dividend
1 $1.0600
2 $1.1236
3 $1.1910

V2: $1.191/(0.10 – 0.06) = $29.78

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.c)

Question #114 of 135 Question ID: 1472919

Which of the following is NOT a component of the sustainable growth rate formula using the
DuPont model?

A) EBIT/interest expense.
B) Net income/sales.
C) Earnings retention ratio.

Explanation

SGR = b × ROE

where:

b = earnings retention rate = (1 − dividend payout rate)

ROE = return on equity

The SGR is important because it tells us how quickly a firm can grow with internally
generated funds. A firm's rate of growth is a function of both its earnings retention and its
return on equity. ROE can be estimated with the DuPont formula, which presents the
relationship between margin, sales, and leverage as determinants of ROE. In the 3-part
version of the DuPont model: ROE = (NI/sales)(sales/assets)(assets/equity)

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #115 of 135 Question ID: 1472856

Analyst Louise Dorgan has put together a short fact sheet on two companies, Benson
Orchards and Terra Firma Development.

Benson Orchards Terra Firma Development

Price/earnings ratio 18.5

Most recent dividend $0.56 per share $1.67 per share

Estimated stock return 15%

Estimated market return 13%

Beta 1.2 1.7

Trailing profits $5.16 per share

Stock-market value $123 million $1.678 billion

Shares outstanding 875 million

The risk-free rate is 3.6%, and Dorgan estimates the stock market's equity risk premium as
7.5%.

Using only the data presented above, can Dorgan create a Gordon Growth model for:

Benson Terra Firm

Orchards Development

A) Yes Yes

B) No No

C) Yes No

Explanation
To calculate a growth rate using the Gordon Growth model, we use four variables (one
being the growth rate itself). If we have any three of the variables, we can solve for the
fourth. The four variables are: stock price, dividend, required return, and dividend growth
rate. The data presented are sufficient for the calculation of three of the variables for both
companies.

Benson Orchards

We know the most recent dividend and the estimate stock return. From the P/E ratio and
the trailing profits, we can determine the stock price. From those three pieces of data, we
can calculate the dividend growth rate.

Terra Firma

We have the dividend. We can determine the stock price by dividing market value by
shares outstanding. We can derive the estimated stock return using the capital asset
pricing model. From those three statistics, we can create a Gordon Growth model and
solve for the dividend-growth rate.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.f)

Question #116 of 135 Question ID: 1472886

An analyst has forecast that Hapex Company, which currently pays a dividend of $6.00, will
grow at a rate of 8%, declining to 5% over the next two years, and remain at that rate
thereafter. If the required return is 10%, based on an H-model what is the current value of
Hapex shares?

A) $126.24.
B) $129.60.
C) $131.17.

Explanation

The current value of Hapex shares is $129.60:

V0 = [$6(1 + 0.05) + $6(2/2)(0.08 – 0.05)] / (0.10 – 0.05) = $129.60

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #117 of 135 Question ID: 1472864

A firm has the following characteristics:

Current share price $100.00.

Current earnings $3.50.
Current dividend $0.75.
Growth rate 11%.
Required return 13%.

Based on this information and the Gordon growth model, what is the firm's justified trailing
price to earnings (P/E) ratio?

A) 11.3.
B) 8.9.
C) 11.9.

Explanation

The justified trailing P/E is 11.9:

P0 / E0 = [($0.75)(1 + 0.11)/$3.50] / (0.13 – 0.11) = 11.8929

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.h)

Question #118 of 135 Question ID: 1472868

A firm has the following characteristics:

Current share price $100.00.

One-year earnings $3.50
One-year dividend $0.75.
Required return 13%.
Justified leading price to earnings 10.

Based on the dividend discount model, what is the firm's assumed growth rate?

A) 12.4%.
B) 8.6%.
C) 10.9%.

Explanation
The assumed growth rate is 10.9%:

P0 / E1 = ($0.75/$3.50) / (0.13 – g) = 10, g = 10.86%

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.h)

Question #119 of 135 Question ID: 1508663

One of the limitations of the dividend discount models (DDMs) is that they:

A) are very sensitive to growth and required return assumptions.

B) are conceptually difficult.
C) can only be used for companies that are experiencing stable growth.

Explanation

DDMs are very sensitive to the growth and required return assumptions, and it is often
wise to interpret the value as a range rather than a precise dollar amount. There are
versions of DDM models that can be applied to companies transitioning from rapid growth
to moderate growth, etc.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #120 of 135 Question ID: 1472929

Supergro has current dividends of $1, current earnings of $3, and a sustainable growth rate
of 10%. What is Supergro's return on equity?

A) 20%.
B) 12%.
C) 15%.

Explanation

The ROE for Supergro can be determined by solving for ROE in the sustainable growth
formula:

ROE = 10% / [1 – ($1/$3)] = 15%

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)
Question #121 of 135 Question ID: 1472814

Which of the following is least likely a potential problem associated with the three-stage
dividend discount model (DDM)? The:

A) beta in the stable period is too high, resulting in an extremely low stock value.
high-growth and transitional periods are too long, resulting in an extremely high
B)
stock value.
C) stable period payout ratio may be too high resulting in an extremely low value.

Explanation

If the stable period payout ratio is too low it may result in an extremely low value because
the terminal value will be lower due to the smaller dividends being paid out.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #122 of 135 Question ID: 1472851

Which of the following would be least appropriate to value using the Gordon growth model?

A) Water utility companies.

B) Profitable rapidly-growing companies.
C) Broad-based equity indices.

Explanation

A discounted dividend approach is suitable for valuing a dividend-paying stock where

there is a clear and direct relationship between the company's dividends and its
profitability. Analysts also sometimes use the Gordon growth model to value broad
developed-market equity indexes. The Gordon growth model is generally inappropriate for
valuing a profitable rapidly-growing firm, which is likely to not pay a dividend, or which
may possess supernormal growth that cannot be expected to continue. A firm that does
not pay a dividend is likely to be valued based on free cash flow.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

Question #123 of 135 Question ID: 1472926

Supergro has current dividends of $1, current earnings of $3, and a return on equity of 16%,
what is its sustainable growth rate?
A) 12.2%.
B) 10.7%.
C) 8.9%.

Explanation

g = (1 – 1/3)(0.16) = 0.107
(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #124 of 135 Question ID: 1472807

If an investor were attempting to capture an asset's alpha returns, the expected holding
period return (HPR) would be:

A) lower than the required return.

B) the same as the required return.
C) higher than the required return.

Explanation

Alpha returns are returns in addition to the required returns, so the expected HPR would
be higher than the required return.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.a)

Question #125 of 135 Question ID: 1472922

GreenGrow, Inc., has current dividends of $2.00, current earnings of $4.00 and a return on
equity of 16%. What is GreenGrow's sustainable growth rate?

A) 6%.
B) 9%.
C) 8%.

Explanation

GreenGrow's sustainable growth rate is 8%.

g = [1 – ($2/$4)](0.16) = 8%
(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)
Question #126 of 135 Question ID: 1472849

The Gordon growth model is most likely to produce useful results when the dividend growth
rate is:

A) negative.
B) greater than the required rate of return.
C) equal to the required rate of return.

Explanation

The Gordon growth model P0 = DPS1/ (r - g) will not work if the growth rate is greater than
or equal to the required rate of return. Negative growth rates are acceptable in the
Gordon growth model.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.e)

A team of analysts at WSM investments are currently analyzing the equity value of Shotput
Inc., which they believe may be a potential takeover target for some of its rivals. Three of the
analysts, Jeff Capes, CFA, Sven Karlson, CFA, and Zydrunas Savickas, CFA, are using the
dividend discount model to try to value the company.

Jeff Capes, CFA, decided to use the constant growth Dividend Discount Model (DDM) to
estimate the equity value. He is using the following information from Shotput's financial
statements for the year just ended:

Income Statement $m

Revenues 850

COGS 580

SG&A 200

Depreciation expense 50

Earnings before tax 20

Taxes 10

Net income 10

Dividend 6

Balance Sheet $m

Cash 10

Accounts receivable 450

Prepaid expenses 50

Fixed assets 400

Total assets 910

Current liabilities 550

Long-term debt 156

Equity 204

Total liabilities & equity 910

In order to calculate Return on Equity, Jeff calculates and uses the opening equity figure of
$200m.

Capes has identified a company in the same industry, Discus Inc., which has the same size
and risk characteristics as Shotput. He has decided to use the following information on
Discus to estimate a required return for equity holders of Shotput:

Equity market value

$62.94m
Dividend just paid $5.5m

Sustainable growth rate 3%

Capes is also interested in calculating the present value of growth opportunities (PVGO) for
Shotput. He is proposing to use the last dividend paid by Shotput and divide it by the
required rate of return to get the value of its assets in place, and compare this to the
fundamental value to get PVGO.

Sven Karlson, CFA, is also estimating an equity value for Shotput using the DDM. He has
estimated a required return for equity of 11% using the Capital Asset Pricing Model. He has
also picked up the dividends just paid as $6m from the financial statements.

Karlson, however, is uncertain about how dividends will grow and feels that Shotput has a
competitive advantage over its rivals in the short term, which will lead to increased dividend
growth for the next few years. He has therefore assumed that for the first three years the
dividend growth rate will be 7% p.a., and then will decline linearly over the next six years to
2% p.a., a growth rate that will then be sustained for the foreseeable future.

Zydrunas Savickas, however, has questioned the use of the DDM for the purposes of their
research. They are hoping to present their findings to one of Shotput's competitors who they
feel may be in a position to launch a takeover bid and realize a gain from Shotput's current
undervaluation.

Savickas states, "While I accept that a benefit of the dividend discount model is that the
resulting valuation is not very sensitive to changes in the required rate of return assumption,
as we are looking at a potential takeover, it may be more appropriate to consider a free cash
flow model. The dividend discount model is most appropriate from the perspective of a
minority shareholder."

Question #127 - 130 of 135 Question ID: 1472896

Using Shotput's financial statements and Jeff Cape's estimates, calculate an equity value for
Shotput using the constant growth DDM:

A) $60.0m.
B) $61.2m.
C) $66.7m.

Explanation
P0 = D0 (1 + g) / (r – g)

g = RR × ROE = ($4m / $10m) × ($10m / $200m) = 0.4 × 0.05 = 0.02

Using information re: Discuss and rearranging the DDM:

r = d0(1 + g) / P0 + g

r = $5.5m(1.03) / $62.94m + 0.03 = 0.12

P0 = $6m(1.02) / (0.12 – 0.02) = $61.2m

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.f)

Question #128 - 130 of 135 Question ID: 1472897

Calculate an equity value using the assumptions made by Karlson (to the nearest $m):

A) $73m.
B) $79m.
C) $87m.

Explanation
This is three-stage growth with linear decline during the second stage.

Step 1: Calculate the H model at T3:

P3 = [D3 × (1 + gl)] / (r – gl) + [30 × H × (gh – gl)] / (r – gl)

P3 = [$6m(1.07)3 × (1.02)] / (0.11 – 0.02) + [$6m(1.07)3 × 3 × (0.07 0.02)] / (0.11 – 0.02)

P3 = $83.3m + $12.25m

P3 = $95.55m

Step 2: Discount H model value back to T0:

$95.55m / 1.113 = $69.87m

Step 3: Discount the dividends relating to the first stage:

Dividend stream = 6(1.07) + 6(1.07)2 + 6(1.07)3

Dividend stream = 6.42 + 6.87 + 7.35

PV = 6.42 / 1.11 + 6.87 / 1.112 + 7.35 / 1.113

PV = 5.78 + 5.58 + 5.37

PV = $16.73m

Adding Step 2 and Step 3 together:

P0 = $69.87m + $16.73m

P0 = $86.6m ($87m to the nearest $m)

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.n)

Question #129 - 130 of 135 Question ID: 1472898

Is Savickas correct in his comments regarding the DDM?

He is correct about the minority perspective, but not the sensitivity to the
A)
required rate of return assumption.
He is correct about the minority perspective and the required rate of return
B)
assumption.
C) He is incorrect in both statements.

Explanation
The DDM is more appropriate for a minority shareholder. After a takeover, the acquirer
will have control over the dividend policy and hence a FCF model is more appropriate.
However, a DDM valuation is very sensitive to changes in the input assumptions.

(Module 20.1, LOS 20.b)

Question #130 - 130 of 135 Question ID: 1472899

What adjustment to his calculation method does Capes need to make in to correctly
calculate PVGO?

The value of assets in place is given by the previous dividend multiplied by one
A)
plus the sustainable growth rate divided by the required rate of return.
The value of assets in place is given by earnings divided by the required rate of
B)
return.
The value of assets in place is given by earnings divided by the required rate of
C)
return minus the sustainable growth rate.

Explanation

The value of assets in place is E / r. The difference between this value and the fundamental
value is PVGO.

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.g)

Question #131 of 135 Question ID: 1472866

Stan Bellton, CFA, is preparing a report on TWR, Inc. Bellton's supervisor has requested that
Bellton include a justified trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio based on the following
information:

Current earnings per share (EPS) = $3.50.

Dividend Payout Ratio = 0.60.

Required return for TRW = 0.15.

Expected constant growth rate for dividends = 0.05.

TWR's justified trailing P/E ratio is closest to:

A) 6.3.
B) 4.0.
C) 6.0.

Explanation

The dividend payout ratio (1 – b) is 0.60, so the retention ratio (b) is 0.4.

(0.60) (1 + 0.05)
= 6.30
0.15 − 0.05

(Module 20.2, LOS 20.h)

Question #132 of 135 Question ID: 1472907

Which of the following groups of statistics provides enough data to calculate an implied
return for a stock using the two-stage DDM?

Short-term growth rate, long-term growth rate, stock price, trailing 12-month
A)
profits.
P/E ratio, trailing 12-month profits, short-term PEG ratio, long-term PEG ratio,
B)
yield.
C) Yield, stock price, historical dividend-growth rate, historical profit-growth rate.

Explanation
To calculate an implied return using the two-stage DDM, we need the stock price, the
dividend, a short-term growth rate, and a long-term growth rate. In the correct answer, we
can derive the stock price from the P/E ratio and profits, then derive the dividend from the
price and the yield. Given the P/E ratio, we can also distill growth rates using the PEG
ratios. Admittedly, earnings-growth rates aren't the same as dividend-growth rates, but
analysts routinely use either in their models. More to the point, this is the only answer in
which we can come up with even imperfect data for all the needed variables. One choice
does not provide us with a way to find the dividend. The other option does not give us the
needed short-term and long-term growth rates.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.i)

Question #133 of 135 Question ID: 1472874

The three-stage dividend discount model (DDM) allows for an initial period of:

high growth, a transitional period of stable growth and a final declining growth
A)
phase.
stable growth, a transitional period of high growth and a final declining growth
B)
phase.
high growth, a transitional period of declining growth and a final stable growth
C)
phase.

Explanation

The three-stage DDM combines the features of the two-stage DDM and the H model. It
allows for an initial period of high growth, a transitional period of declining growth and a
final stable growth phase.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.l)

Question #134 of 135 Question ID: 1472923

Sustainable growth is the rate that earnings can grow:

A) without additional purchase of equipment.

B) with the current assets.
C) indefinitely without altering the firm's capital structure.

Explanation
Sustainable growth is the rate of earnings growth that can be maintained indefinitely
without the addition of new equity capital.

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.p)

Question #135 of 135 Question ID: 1530461

Q-Partners is expected to have earnings in ten years of $12 per share, a dividend payout
ratio of 50%, and a required return of 11%. At that time, ROE is expected to fall to 8% in
perpetuity and the trailing P/E ratio is forecasted to be eight times earnings. The terminal
value at the end of ten years using the P/E multiple approach and DDM is closest to:

P/E multiple DDM

A) 96.32 85.14

B) 96.00 89.14

C) 96.32 85.71

Explanation

Terminal Value

= P/E × EPS

= 8 × 12 = 96

D10 = 0.5 × 12 = 6

g = 0.50 × 0.08 = 4%

D10 (1 + g)
P10 =
r − g

6 (1.04)
=
(0.11 − 0.04)

= 89.14

(Module 20.3, LOS 20.m)