RM Notes - I
RM Notes - I
DEPARTMENT OF ARTS
I. Definition of Research
The word research comes from French “recherché” which means “to seek
closely”. For Richards et al (1992:315), research is the study of events, problems
or phenomenon using systematic and objective methods, with the aim to
understand them better, solve problems and develop principles and theories about
them. Such study takes place under the scope of science, in a specific subject
area. Normally, research starts with a question on a specific problem.
Problems may be of different kinds and nature, such as: Global warming; Epidemic
diseases (coronavirus, Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS); Natural catastrophes, Pollution,
Corruption, Criminality, Unemployment; Terrorism, Massive failure in Education, et.
cetera. In Medicine, for instance, researchers are struggling to find out the vaccine
to cure and eradicate AIDS. In order for them to achieve successfully such
purpose, they need to ask themselves several questions as the starting point of
research activity, as follows: a) How does the HIV virus weaken the antibodies in
the human immune system? b) What should the vaccine against HIV virus consist
of? In Education, researchers may need to know the reasons of massive failure at
secondary schools and put forward these questions, as the departing point of
research activity: a) Why do learners fail in huge numbers at secondary schools?
Before the researchers answer all these questions, they may have to collect
information (data). Data may include verbal information, objects, patterns of social
behavior or habits, anything that might be relevant in the accomplishment of the
research, collected through appropriate and scientifically approved methods and
instruments, from different groups of people (participants or subjects) affected by
the problems under investigation. After data have been tested, analyzed and
interpreted, researchers will come up with answers to the questions advanced
before in the form of reported information as final research results. The information
will make part of scientific knowledge that will help researchers to solve problems in
Medicine or in Education, as presented above.
The production of vegetables in dry seasons, for instance, consists of watering the
seedlings twice a day, until they grow bigger enough, otherwise the plants will die.
This practice is a traditional knowledge that has prevailed probably for centuries. It
is part of our ancestors’ experience in agriculture and most of them have never
been to school. In today’s world, such practice continues. The agronomy engineers
also water the plants in food production, using sophisticated irrigation system. On
the one hand, our ancestors’ knowledge in vegetable production is traditional
because it has been transmitted from generation to generation through simple
observation, transmission of personal experience and imitation. It does not require
the investigation of chemical composition of soils. It is empirical, primitive or
popular knowledge, also known as common sense (Marconi & Lakatos, 2010:57).
On the other, there is what is called scientific knowledge, the one that is
transmitted through formal training in agriculture. It is a reasoned knowledge
because, apart from empirical practices of agricultural practices, it is concerned
with giving scientific explanation about a phenomenon, by answering questions like
why some plants grow vividly in green color in certain areas of the farm and, in
other parts, the plants become yellow and lose their leaves? In both types of
knowledge, there is a common truth held: Vegetables may grow well, if watered
twice a day in dray seasons, at the early stages of development. If that is the case,
what would be the main differences between common sense and scientific
knowledge?
Common sense and scientific knowledge do not differ from one another through the
truth of facts, the nature of object studied or the person who possesses the
knowledge. The difference resides on the way or procedures each employs to
arrive at the very same truth. In such circumstances, we can come to the
conclusions that follow: a) Science is not the only path to access the truth and; b)
The same phenomenon can be an object of observation, either to scientists or to
ordinary people. Apart from common sense and scientific knowledge, there is what
is called theological knowledge whose truth is unquestionable (exact) and not
verifiable, accessed through the faith of believers. It is systematic knowledge of the
world about it is origin, meaning, purpose, and its destiny, as the creation of God.
IV. Methods
Antonio is a mammal
John is a mammal
Ana is a mammal
Forum – II: Select from the elements that follow, the one that makes scientific
knowledge different from common sense and justify your answer:
a. Object of investigation
b. Methods of investigation
c. The researcher
d. The truth in both