Umuc Literature Review
Umuc Literature Review
However, it can be an immensely challenging process that demands time, expertise, and meticulous
attention to detail. A literature review requires a thorough understanding of the existing body of
scholarly work related to a specific topic or research question, as well as the ability to critically
analyze and synthesize this information.
One of the main difficulties in writing a literature review is navigating through the vast amount of
available literature and identifying the most relevant and credible sources. It involves conducting
extensive research across various academic databases, journals, books, and other scholarly sources to
gather pertinent information. Additionally, synthesizing the findings from different sources and
presenting them in a coherent and organized manner can be daunting.
Furthermore, a literature review requires strong analytical and critical thinking skills to evaluate the
quality and reliability of the sources, identify key themes and trends, and draw meaningful
conclusions. It's essential to not only summarize the existing literature but also to analyze and
interpret it in relation to the research topic or problem under investigation.
Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review, many students and researchers seek
assistance to ensure the quality and effectiveness of their work. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers
professional writing services specifically tailored to assist with literature reviews. Our team of
experienced writers specializes in conducting thorough research, critically analyzing literature, and
crafting well-structured and insightful literature reviews.
By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and alleviate the
stress associated with this challenging task. Our expert writers will work closely with you to
understand your specific requirements and deliver a high-quality literature review that meets your
academic needs and expectations. Whether you're a student working on a research paper, a graduate
student preparing a thesis or dissertation, or a researcher seeking to publish scholarly articles, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner for academic success.
The research team started with an exploratory review of background documents and research studies
to identify ways in which patient portals may contribute to health service delivery and patient
outcomes. An rQES team, in particular, cannot afford any extra time or resource requirements that
might arise from either a misunderstanding of the review question, an unclear picture of user
requirements or an inappropriate choice of methods. What kind of material do I need (e.g. theory,
policy, empirical data). However, based on some serious general concerns about the fallout of
companies in the IT industry in general, the CEO has asked your CFO to conduct a financial analysis
of SPRINT to determine if it is prudent to commit to this company’s communication system. Hint:
Refer to Week 2 for a review of research guides. In this way, critical reviews attempt to
constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and strengthen
knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement (
Kirkevold, 1997 ). You may be over requirement for each section, but not under. Structure of the
lecture is as follows:. a. Define Emotional Intelligence b. The study finds that common screening
methods used for LTBI include tuberculin skin tests and interferon-gamma release assay, which is
conducted post-arrival to the host countries (Pareek et al., 2016). The study finds that most high-
income countries do not practice screening for LTBI. The literature review answered the research
question to the fullest extent based on the available data. Let's look at each part of this process in
more detail. It is estimated that one-third of the global population is infected with tuberculosis, but
not all infected people can develop it. Instructions: Work through each step of this log, answering
each question as the directions indicate. You can then use these themes or patterns as a structure for
your body discussion. So, when thinking about structuring your literature review, you need to think
about which structural approach will provide the best “review” for your specific type of research and
objectives (we’ll get to this shortly). Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments
occurred. Some provide broader-level guidance; others are targeted to specific parts of your reviews
such as data extraction or reporting out results. It is their voices that the researcher is trying to hear,
so that they can be interpreted and reported on for others to read and learn from. The data collection
methods used in qualitative research include in depth interviews, focus groups, observations and
stories in the form of diaries or other documents. 3 Authenticity Title, keywords, authors and
abstract. Discuss these assumptions, drawing on your participants’ words to support you as you
move from one code to another and from one theme to the next. Based on the chosen method or
design, the findings may be reported in a variety of different formats. Download references Open
access funding provided by TU Wien (TUW). Rigour should acknowledge the researcher’s role and
involvement as well as any biases. Make a list of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords
related to your research topic. At this stage you might discover that you need to tweak your topic or
the scope of your research as you learn more about the topic in the literature. You should be able to
answer it based only on a review of existing publications. This is a slightly more creative (and
interesting) way of producing the review, but a little more risky as it is harder to establish coherence
and logical sequencing. Write a Literature Review in 30 Minutes or Less STEP. We hold the view
that qualitative research does not seek to power and a sample size can be as small as one (eg, a single
case study) or any number above one (a grounded theory study) providing that it is appropriate and
answers the research problem. Be sure to include your key concepts in your search statement.
A literature review is a comprehensive examination of the international academic literature
concerning a particular topic. Methodology: If your literature review involved a specific research
method, such as a systematic review or meta-analysis, you should briefly describe that methodology.
Although this article does not assert to put forward a magic bullet and to provide a one-stop solution
for dealing with dilemmas about how, why, or whether to evaluate the “goodness” of qualitative
research, it offers a platform to assist the researchers in improving their qualitative studies. Under the
plan, Malaysian universities will develop MOOCs on core modules and students from the twenty
public universities will participate in those courses through Open Learning’s social learning platform.
Indeed, Howe ( 2004 ) claims that the prevailing paradigm in educational research is scientifically
based experimental research. Make sure the sources you use are credible, and make sure you read
any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research. Public and Subscription Websites
with Good Information. Then, of course, you'll need to write and revise your paper and create your
final bibliography. By statistically combining data from multiple studies, meta-analyses can create
more precise and reliable estimates of intervention effects than those derived from individual studies
alone, when these are examined independently as discrete sources of information. Smith 9 suggested
a qualitative research method known as interpretative phenomenological analysis, which has 2 basic
tenets: first, that it is rooted in phenomenology, attempting to understand the meaning that
individuals ascribe to their lived experiences, and second, that the researcher must attempt to
interpret this meaning in the context of the research. One step does lead to another, but sometimes
your research or reading will point you back to earlier steps as you learn more about your topic and
the literature. Subscribe and receive Master Academia's quarterly newsletter. We will examine the
paper “How does culture influence innovation. These databases also often offer access to specialized
material in your area such as grey literature, psychological tests, statistics, books and dissertations.
Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the research
by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical: In many humanities articles, the literature
review is the foundation for the theoretical framework. The search was limited to studies that were
published in English. While researching and organizing your paper, you'll collect a lot of information
from many different sources. The selected articles were then compiled into a matrix to synthesize
them based on the devised themes for analysis. The research team started with an exploratory review
of background documents and research studies to identify ways in which patient portals may
contribute to health service delivery and patient outcomes. Then you start to formulate your own
response or contribution. However, the term is often applied loosely to describe a wide range of
methodological approaches. A drawback to the study was the lack of detail on the screening model
used. For practitioners in pharmacy, it might also be pertinent to explore the participant’s experience
of akathisia and why this was left untreated for 20 years. Hint: Do NOT select newspaper or popular
magazine articles. Pros: comes with many pre-made concept map templates to get you started Cons:
not all features are available in the free version Explore Canva concept map templates here. But
there is still a lack of robust research on highly visual platforms like Instagram and Snapchat—this is
a gap that you could address in your own research. Related guides: Systematic, scoping, and rapid
reviews: An overview Academic writing: what is a literature review, a guide that addresses the
writing and composition aspect of a literature review Media literature reviews: how to conduct a
literature review using news sources Literature reviews in the applied sciences Start your research
here, literature review searching, mainly of interest to newer researchers For more assistance, please
contact the Liaison Librarian in your subject area. When you have multiple sources cited in a
paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not always, but often Read more about
synthesis here. The study’s major research gap clans the screening effects into one broad category
labelled “vulnerable population. Here are some questions you can ask yourself when structuring your
literature review according to methodology: Which methodologies have been utilised in this field.
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen
and your research is thorough. Literature reviews can range from being selective to comprehensive.
The schedule of questions for interview or the protocol for non-interview data collection should be
provided, available or discussed in the paper. You will be required to write a literature review on a
specific (pre-approved) gender communication topic. Fundamentally, knowledge advancement must
be built on prior existing work. Field notes allow the researcher to maintain and comment upon
impressions, environmental contexts, behaviours, and nonverbal cues that may not be adequately
captured through the audio-recording; they are typically handwritten in a small notebook at the same
time the interview takes place. Identify the gaps in the literature and show how your research links
to these. Further Reading Examples of qualitative research in pharmacy practice. Overall, based on
the above analysis of the author’s work, how do you evaluate its contribution to the scholarly
understanding and knowledge surrounding the topic. By all means state your recommendations in
suffi cient detail to. If you understand that these are the objectives of case analysis. Finally, as
appropriate, it is possible to include examples from literature or policy documents that add support
for your findings. By reviewing relevant literature, we understand the breadth and depth of the
existing body of work and identify gaps to explore. This background knowledge for the transcriber
is especially important in research in which people are using jargon or medical terms (as in pharmacy
practice). Summarise material in your own words as much as possible. In proposing an action plan,
remember there is a great deal of. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to
identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the existing research. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
This paper represents the first attempt to compile current guidance, illustrated by the experience of
several international review teams. We identify features of rapid QES methods that could be
accelerated or abbreviated and where methods resemble those for conventional QESs. Essentially,
you should provide the reader with a high-level roadmap of your chapter to give them a taste of the
journey that lies ahead. In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the conversation,
which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple reporting of other sources. Sample
Master Education Literature Review Sample Master Education Literature Review Here is a sample
that showcases why we are one of the world's leading academic writing firms. This assignment was
created by one of our expert academic writers and demonstrated the highest academic quality.
Further, researchers have also outlined different criteria as hallmarks of high-quality qualitative
research. View inline Glossary of important terms (alphabetically) As with other resource-constrained
reviews, no one size fits all. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a
class or as publications. Bennett et al. (2014) used TBHI screening results to analyze the prevalence
of LTBI among the refugee population in San Diego, California, from January 2010 and October
2012. The work of Latif and others 12 gives an example of how qualitative research findings might
be presented. Does the author include literature opposing their point of view. Being aware of the
standpoints you are taking in your own research is one of the foundations of qualitative work.
Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms and related
terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your literature search.
MOTIVATE YOUR RESEARCH in addition to providing useful information about your topic, your
literature review must tell a story about how your project relates to existing literature.
Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your sources are
together in a room, discussing your topic. The study used a video that was a culturally tailored, multi-
lingual, 4.5-minute health promotional video focused on LTBI with Canadian immigrants (Gao et al.,
2017). Gao et al. (2017) found that 84 percent of viewers had found the video helpful while viewing
the video caused a 21 percent increase in knowledge about LTBI. This simply mean that the
researchers were not gaining any new information at subsequent interviews, so they stopped data
collection. This personal history therefore forms the filter through which the data will be examined.
Literature reviews for graduate students This guide is designed as a starting point for graduate
students conducting a literature review, particularly in the social and behavioral sciences. Video
downloaded Assessment questions Mary Cazzell, PhD, RN, director of nursing research and
evidence-based practice at Cook Children's Medical Center in Fort Worth, Texas, discusses ways to
critique quantitative and qualitative research articles used for literature reviews and explains why
this skill is important in evidence-based practice. It provides a digital canvas where users can create
and manipulate nodes representing concepts or topics, and connect them with lines to show
relationships and associations. That the researcher has some knowledge and expertise in the subject
of the research means that he or she can have considerable scope in interpreting the participant’s
experiences. Explain why you selected this particular article (Step 4) and. Your final report is to be
an executive-level financial report directed to the CFO. Different subject areas Find literature
reviews When conducting your searches you may find many references that will not be suitable to
use in your literature review. Let’s continue. The Lopez-Rocha entry focuses on a
solution—diversity training. It. It will accomplish this by integrating your research into the broader
academic literature and providing a solid theoretical foundation for your work. If you are writing the
literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research
question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. One step does lead to another, but
sometimes your research or reading will point you back to earlier steps as you learn more about your
topic and the literature. The inclusion of quotes or similar research data enhances the confirmability in
the write-up of the findings. Adobe Express Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu publication.
The various courses and workshops such as the Information Competency and Management (ICM),
the Lunch Time Sessions and the Research Management Workshops, all piloted in 200. Victoria
(BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. MOTIVATE YOUR RESEARCH in addition to providing
useful information about your topic, your literature review must tell a story about how your project
relates to existing literature. The first entry by Barker and Gower concerns the use of. Being aware of
the standpoints you are taking in your own research is one of the foundations of qualitative work. An
annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short description (called an annotation
) for each of the sources. Faculty of Informatics, Technische Universitat Wien, 1040, Vienna, Austria
Drishti Yadav You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Corresponding author
Correspondence to Drishti Yadav. I am doing a research on nanofluids how can l structure it. The
current study uses a systematic literature review of qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
studies. Find out here Writing a literature review is an inevitable part of being a graduate student.
One of the most highly cited scoping reviews in the eHealth domain was published by Archer,
Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and Straus (2011). In other words, after grappling with the
literature you’ll have an opinion about what the trends and concerns are in the field as well as what’s
lacking. However, check umuc cybersecurity masters review at our Course below link.
The preparation of an oral presentation has much in common. Review the search results from the
database search you. Finally, average impact scores increased over time with two notable growth
periods. Here, you will find several examples that meet, or in most cases, adhere to the criteria
described earlier. Record your research question from Research Project Log Part 1 (Step 1). Your
review will not only cover what's been published on your topic, but will include your own thoughts
and ideas. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and summarising
sources in order. Can the evidence presented be interpreted another way. This section is followed by
a summary of the strategies to improve the quality of qualitative research in Sect. Bringing together
the vital arguments and delineating the requirements that good qualitative research should satisfy,
this review strives to equip the researchers as well as reviewers to make well-versed judgment about
the worth and significance of the qualitative research under scrutiny. A pre-existing framework,
where readily identified, may help to structure the data extraction template. 15 37 The same
framework may be used to present the findings. Structure of the lecture is as follows:. a. Define
Emotional Intelligence b. Various researchers have put forward criteria for evaluating qualitative
research, which have been summarized in Table 3. However, to maximize the learning benefit, you
are encouraged to share freely and exchange. Method at the Harvard Business School, ed. M. P.
McNair, pp. Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a
literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also
developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any
other stakeholders in your topic. Essentially, you should provide the reader with a high-level
roadmap of your chapter to give them a taste of the journey that lies ahead. Presented by: Susan
Wilkes, Ph.D. Wilkes Consulting, LLC. Further reading around the subject will be essential to truly
understand this method of accessing peoples’ thoughts and feelings to enable researchers to tell
participants’ stories. Appendix 1.?Excerpt from a sample transcript The participant (age late 50s) had
suffered from a chronic mental health illness for 30 years. A good conclusion will focus on the
findings and discussion of the phenomena investigated. While researching and organizing your paper,
you'll collect a lot of information from many different sources. Alternatively, others opt to seamlessly
integrate the introduction into the initial sentences of the literature review itself. Such debates are
based on the wide range of philosophical backgrounds within which qualitative research is conducted
(e.g., Sandberg, 2000; Schwandt, 1996 ). Two members of the research team selected the articles
using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria and following a two-step procedure.
Analysis of Cases,” in The Case Method at the Harvard. Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria Caldecott Medal
Book Winners and Media Used Caldecott Medal Book Winners and Media Used Colquitt County
High School skeletal system details with joints and its types skeletal system details with joints and
its types Minaxi patil. Be tentative and careful in the way you interpret the evidence. However the
data are being collected, a primary responsibility of the researcher is to safeguard participants and
their data. Take a look as well at the Subject Guides on both the Templeman and DHL websites. An
rQES typically focuses on direct evidence, except when only indirect evidence is available 28 ( table
2, item R4).
Critical analysis: an assessment of the relative strengths and weaknesses of the evidence used, and
the arguments presented. But don't fall into the trap of making your review a laundry list of
summaries of the works you read. The paper should explain when and how the study was advertised,
participants were recruited and consented. Their model follows the systematic data processing
approach comprised of three steps, namely: (a) literature search and screening; (b) data extraction and
analysis; and (c) writing the literature review. Shorten and Moorley 8 explain that three main types of
sampling exist in qualitative research: (1) convenience (2) judgement or (3) theoretical. As you read
you may start by describing and summarizing each article. Such debates would not only benefit the
group of qualitative researchers themselves, but primarily assist in augmenting the well-being and
vivacity of the entire discipline. Nuzzo et al. (2013) looked to determine the proportion of refugee
patients at the Baltimore City Health Department TB program completing their LTBI treatment
compared to other referral groups. About subject headings: They are applied systematically: articles
and books will usually have about 3-8 subject headings assigned to their bibliographic record. For
more information about collecting qualitative data, please see the “Further Reading” section at the
end of this paper. Sandberg, J. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretative
approach. However, this strategy’sactual implementation may be led to research in this area that
focuses on mobile health units’ impact on screening, education, and adherence to treatment for latent
TB. Quality Checklists: Tools for Assessing the Quality Numerous checklists are available to speed
up the assessment of the quality of qualitative research. A second screen of full-text articles, again by
two independent members of the research team, ensured that the studies described phr s. Then, of
course, you'll need to write and revise your paper and create your final bibliography. Some specific
types of lit reviews types include systematic reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, narrative
reviews, mapping reviews, and qualitative systematic reviews, just to name a few. For most
graduate-level literature reviews, it is usually recommended to use both. What is the author's research
method (e.g. qualitative, quantitative, experimental, etc.)? What is the author's theoretical framework
(e.g. psychological, developmental, feminist). Does the author demonstrate any obvious bias which
could affect their reliability. By Renee Schulz RN MS Organizational Development. Objectives. The
participants will be able to: Define Emotional Intelligence Relate the importance of Emotional
Intelligence to Effective Leadership and Management. Qualitative and quantitative studies are,
however, fundamentally different approaches to research and therefore need to be considered
differently with regard to critiquing. They provide a standardized way to describe a concept.
Indicates the average length of time the fi rm must. Help Center Here you'll find an answer to your
question. The lack of explanation is a major research gap that needs to be filled to understand more
refugees’ phenomena adhering to treatment than native-born patients. Kan et al. (2013) aimed at
studying treatment completion in refugees to identify factors associated with failure to complete
preventive treatments. For example, a master’s thesis typically features a more concise literature
review, thus necessitating a shorter introduction. The preparation of an oral presentation has much in
common. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to characterize publication trends in
the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to 2006). Brilliant work, well
understood, many thanks I like how this was so clear with simple language. Summarise material in
your own words as much as possible.
Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Research: A Critical Literature Review A qualitative study, though
not involving procedures of direct risk to participants, includes the possibility of causing harm to the
human being's physical, psychic, moral, intellectual, social, and cultural dimensions, at any one of its
phases, as a result of it or a posteriori ( Kottow, 2008 ). The article should not just be a brief
overview of the topic but. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing
sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site. However, based on some
serious general concerns about the fallout of companies in the IT industry. In most courses in
strategic management, students use cases. It’s important to note though that copyright restrictions
apply to these resources, just as they would with published papers. It is advised that researchers
undertake a formal course in the use of such software or seek supervision from a researcher
experienced in these tools. The paper begins with a general introduction and then proceeds to the
literature review, designated by the authors as their conceptual framework. If this is the case, then it
is a good idea to sit down with the transcriber, if possible, and talk through the research and what the
participants were talking about. You can use our template to summarize and evaluate sources you’re
thinking about using. One last thing is missing: a link to a great literature chapter of an journal article
(maybe with comments of the different sections in this review chapter). Here is an article about
cognitive behavioral therapy. The reemergence of tuberculosis in low-prevalence industrialized
countries in the West and Australia has become a public health challenge. It is very important that
you know what a literature is, its. In unison, this review reinforces that each qualitative approach
should be treated uniquely on account of its own distinctive features for different epistemological
and disciplinary positions. Is there a counter-argument, and has the author dealt with this adequately.
Some signs of masters literature review: the presence of a specific topic or question. The data
collection tool was information literacy and medical error questionnaires designed based on the
Likert's spectrum measurement scale. This paper should expand your knowledge of the subject area,
clearly demonstrate your vast understanding of the topic to the professor and provide readers with
the most current, scholarly research on the topic. However, researchers and reviewers need to keep in
mind that it is inappropriate to utilize the same approaches and conducts among all qualitative
research. Excellent (5 points): Lists alternative relevant keywords that. At the other end of the
continuum, the review may involve completing a comprehensive search, complete with documented
search strategies and a listing of article inclusion and exclusion criteria. Electronic Journal of
Business Research Methods, 6(2), 103-114. From this perspective, bias and subjectivity are not
inherently negative but they are unavoidable; as a result, it is best that they be articulated up-front in
a manner that is clear and coherent for readers. You can use a subheading for each theme, time
period, or methodological approach. Literature review process: Conduct a rigorous literature review,
reviewing and analyzing relevant sources. Instead, you should always offer some form of
introduction to orient the reader and clarify what they can expect. Methodology Qualitative research
encompasses a variety of methods and designs. What type of literature is available (e.g. journals,
books, government documents). Avoid inadvertently re-doing your searches by being well-
documented and systematic as you go along - it's worth the extra effort.