State The Purpose of Literature Review
State The Purpose of Literature Review
A literature review is a critical component of academic research, serving multiple purposes essential
for scholarly inquiry. This comprehensive examination of existing literature on a specific topic
provides a foundation for understanding the current state of knowledge, identifying gaps, and
generating new insights. The primary purposes of a literature review include:
1. Understanding the Context: Literature reviews contextualize research within the broader
academic discourse. By examining existing studies, researchers gain insights into the
historical development, key concepts, and debates surrounding their topic.
2. Identifying Knowledge Gaps: Through a thorough analysis of existing literature, researchers
can identify gaps or inconsistencies in current knowledge. This identification informs the
formulation of research questions and hypotheses, guiding the direction of future studies.
3. Evaluating Methodologies and Approaches: Literature reviews enable researchers to
evaluate different methodologies and approaches used in previous studies. By assessing the
strengths and weaknesses of existing research methods, researchers can make informed
decisions about the most appropriate methodologies for their own study.
4. Synthesizing Findings: A literature review involves synthesizing findings from multiple
sources to develop a cohesive understanding of the topic. This synthesis may reveal patterns,
trends, or contradictions in the literature, providing valuable insights for further research.
5. Supporting Theoretical Frameworks: Literature reviews provide a theoretical framework
for research by highlighting relevant theories and conceptual frameworks. By integrating
theoretical perspectives from existing literature, researchers can develop a theoretical
foundation for their own study.
6. Informing Methodological Rigor: Through the examination of existing literature,
researchers gain insights into best practices and standards for conducting research in their
field. This knowledge helps ensure methodological rigor and validity in their own study
design and data analysis.
7. Contributing to Knowledge Creation: Ultimately, literature reviews contribute to the
advancement of knowledge by synthesizing existing research, identifying gaps, and
generating new research questions. By building upon the work of previous scholars,
researchers can contribute to ongoing scholarly conversations and debates.
Writing a literature review can be a challenging task, requiring extensive research, critical analysis,
and synthesis of diverse sources. For researchers seeking assistance with literature reviews, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional writing services tailored to individual needs. Our team of
experienced writers can help you navigate the complexities of literature review writing, ensuring
clarity, coherence, and academic rigor in your work. Order now and let us help you achieve your
research goals.
Does your introduction clearly convey the purpose of the literature review. Write the review
Thompson Writing Studio This link opens in a new window Need to write a systematic review. This
can range from resubmitting an entire assignment to reusing passages or data from something you’ve
handed in previously. In social and communication studies, articles are used as primary sources to
analyse language and social relations (for example, by conducting content analysis or discourse
analysis ). Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various
strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. In the in-text citation, first mention the
source you want to refer to, and then the source in which you found it. It’s often best to ask a variety
of people to review your measurements. Or the review might focus on the fundraising impact of the
Internet on a particular political party. It’s one of a group of plural nouns in English that are identical
to the corresponding singular nouns. When creating a literature review, a lot of writers just sum up
the material collected from sources they have browsed, and this is a huge mistake. Alendronate was
the first bisphosphonate approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as
a treatment of osteoporosis in 1995, and many others have been approved and found wide use since
then. Please check course or programme information and materials provided by teaching staff,
including your project supervisor, for subject-specific guidance. There are numerous synonyms for
the various meanings of truly: Yours truly is a phrase used at the end of a formal letter or email. If
the test fails to include parts of the construct, or irrelevant parts are included, the validity of the
instrument is threatened, which brings your results into question. In the second scenario, you need at
least three times as many sources as there are pages in your work. Ad populum (or appeal to
popularity) fallacy and appeal to authority fallacy are similar in that they both conflate the validity of
a belief with its popular acceptance among a specific group. As you probably already know, not all
research is created equally, and so you need to make sure that your literature review is built on
credible research. If you want to explore ideas, thoughts, and meanings, use qualitative methods.
Collaborating to share resources and pedagogy: Interdisciplinary Intercollegiate Faculty Learning
Circles. Pathetic fallacy and appeal to pathos sound similar but they refer to entirely different things.
It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. In
research, you might have come across something called the hypothetico-deductive method. ChatGPT
outputs are unoriginal and lack personal insight. You can also review the indexes of books to find
references to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. For example, contrasting
theoretical approaches or conflicting interpretations of findings can be the basis of your research
project: can you find evidence supporting one interpretation against another, or can you propose an
alternative interpretation that overcomes their limitations. In general, though, don’t include citations
unless absolutely necessary. For example, the genetic fallacy makes an appeal to the source or origin
of the claim in an attempt to assert or refute something. Discriminant validity indicates whether two
tests that should not be highly related to each other are indeed not related. Paperpal is an AI writing
assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and
grammar correction. Grammatically, it usually functions as a conjunction, but sometimes it’s a
preposition.
Structuring a literature review Directing the argument and synthesising sources Being critical in your
literature review. You must be able to the answer below questions before you start: How many
sources do I need to include. Over time, the open compound “bi cause” became the closed
compound “because”, which we use today. However, you should be extra careful when deciding
what counts as common knowledge. We hope this guide has helped you answer several key
questions you have about writing literature reviews. On the other hand, convenience sampling
involves stopping people at random, which means that not everyone has an equal chance of being
selected depending on the place, time, or day you are collecting your data. It is conducted before the
research to highlight gaps in the existing body of knowledge and explains why the project should be
greenlit. Yes, the literature review should ideally be written in the past tense. If you don’t choose
one, your editor will follow the style of English you currently use. There are eight threats to internal
validity: history, maturation, instrumentation, testing, selection bias, regression to the mean, social
interaction, and attrition. So you’ll often hit a paywall when clicking through to journal websites.
You can control and standardise the process for high reliability and validity (e.g., choosing
appropriate measurements and sampling methods ). Equivocation is a fallacy because it is a form of
argumentation that is both misleading and logically unsound. John Hart Havertown, PA: A Legacy of
Academic Excellence, Leadership Prowess. For example, someone who has formal education or
years of experience can be an expert. Instead, use a tool designed for this purpose, like the Scribbr
Citation Generator. Writing a literature review also allows you to: gain expertise in the ability to scan
the literature on a particular topic efficiently, and hone your skills in identifying and analysing
unbiased and valid data on various topics or fields of study. In order to download the sample you are
interested in, you just need to access our page and fill in the offered online form. Purposes of A
literature Review Source of research ideas. No, ChatGPT is not a credible source of factual
information and can’t be cited for this purpose in academic writing. Scope and Purpose: Clearly
define the scope of your literature review. Influential resources: Significant research projects available
that have been upheld as milestones or perhaps, something that can modify the current trends Once
you join the dots between various past research works, it will be easier for you to draw a conclusion
and identify your contribution to the existing knowledge base. 5. Structure planning to write a good
literature review There exist different ways towards planning and executing the structure of a
literature review. This phenomenon is called optimism bias or positivity bias. Importantly, there were
fewer patients treated with estrogen with joint pain than those treated with other medications, and
those treated with estrogen with joint pain had lower subjective pain scores than patients treated
with other therapies. Denosumab inhibits RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-. In
scientific subjects, the information itself is more important than how it was expressed, so quoting
should generally be kept to a minimum. Bisphosphonates as disease-modifying drugs in osteoarthritis
preclinical studies: a systematic review from 2000 to 2020. Their accuracy is determined by two
factors: the algorithm (which recognises the plagiarism) and the size of the database (with which
your document is compared). Abstracts are often indexed along with keywords on academic
databases, so they make your work more easily findable. The good news is that you’ve come to the
right place.
A fallacy is a mistaken belief, particularly one based on unsound arguments or one that lacks the
evidence to support it. Action research links theory and practice in several cycles to drive innovative
changes. Explanatory sequential: Quantitative data is collected and analysed first, followed by
qualitative data. False dilemma fallacy is also known as false dichotomy, false binary, and “either-or”
fallacy. If many people believe something, our common sense tells us that it must be true and we
tend to accept it. Results are usually written in the past tense, because they are describing the
outcome of completed actions. At this point consider: Does your study extend current research.
Literature review top tips (pdf) Literature review top tips (Word rtf) Our reading page includes
strategies and advice on using books and articles and a notes record sheet grid you can use. If you
cite the same source more than once in your writing, use the same number for all of the IEEE in-text
citations for that source, and only include it on the IEEE reference page once. Determine The
Purposes For The Literature Review Recognize The Need For Becoming Familiar With The Library's
Services Distinguish Between Primary And Secondary Sources In Research Literature Recognize
The Importance Of Grey Literature. Grad students have different backgrounds Not every grad
student has done research Not everyone has experience reading the literature. No problem. You are
learning to ask questions. Inductive reasoning is also called inductive logic or bottom-up reasoning.
You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat
loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. You can access ChatGPT
by signing up for a free account: Follow this link to the ChatGPT website. A hypothesis states your
predictions about what your research will find. So, if you have a 10,000-word research paper, the
minimum word count could be 1500. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are typically presented and
discussed in the methodology section of your thesis or dissertation. If a source gives you an
overview of background information or presents another researcher’s ideas on your topic, it is
probably a secondary source. If you don’t choose one, your editor will follow the style of English
you currently use. Editing comes first, and can involve major changes to content, structure and
language. The second chapter of a research study is the Review of Literature The purpose of the
review of literature is to make the readers aware of the extent of the research problem under
investigation This is not a book report on each lit review item obtained. The sources the author cited
should be easy to find, clear, and unbiased. Clean data are valid, accurate, complete, consistent,
unique, and uniform. The red herring fallacy is a problem because it is flawed reasoning. Our
literature review top tips suggest some specific things you can do to help you submit a successful
review. Hypothesis testing is a formal procedure for investigating our ideas about the world using
statistics. There are 4 levels of measurement, which can be ranked from low to high: Nominal: the
data can only be categorised. Literature Review Outline momentumclubs.org literature review paper
example sample write template research outline tips nice slideshare 50 Smart Literature Review
Templates (APA). Provides editors with a list of potential reviewers. It should not feel like a
glorified annotated bibliography. ( ).