Response Paper 4
Response Paper 4
Response Paper 4
In this week’s reading, Lanval by Marie de France stands out amongst the lais since it
exposes the corruption of Camelot and its leaders, King Arthur, and Queen Guinevere. In the
beginning, the lai mentions how King Arthur is being generous for giving out “rich gifts”, “lands
and wives” to all his counts and noblemen. Although this may be a sign of generosity, it is also
equal to excessive and pretentious spending from King Arthur, in which his men are groomed
with greed from those rare liveries; while the King could absolutely use those money to
strengthen his kingdom or people. This also indicates that Camelot has been in peace for way too
long that the King and Knights lose their alert to protect the country, but to only enjoy the wealth
that they have: oftentimes this is a foreshadowing of a collapse of a civilization. In addition, the
fact that Lanval is being mistreated by King Arthur and other men shows many problems that
will crumble Camelot from the inside: ungratefulness, favoritism, jealousy, and ultimately
disunity. It also denounces the hypocrisy of the Knights who always call themselves honored and
noble men. Lanval is described as “a king’s son, of high lineage/ but he was far from his
heritage” who has spent “all his wealth/ for the king gave him nothing/ nor did Lanval ask him
for anything,” showing his absolute loyalty and dedication to Camelot; still, King Arthur chooses
to disregard Lanval. When a King is so blind he can not perceive his people well: man like
Lanval is being horrendously mistreated by the King and other men, while there are people like
Lancelot who always act nobly and are highly respected/regarded but would be ready to break
any oath for their own goods (Lancelot literally has an affair with his liege’s wife, queen
Guinevere). When people with immorality play an important role in a kingdom, it is inevitable
that they will damage the kingdom (in fact, Gawain is the only one who feels bad and still has
Guinevere, who fails in her attempt to seduce Lanval. Even if we disregard her infamous affair
with Lancelot, the fact that Queen Guinevere tries to hit on Lanval demonstrates two main
problems: 1) she is one lustful woman who would literally downgrade herself for sexual desire
(by wanting to sleep with someone who is below her husband), 2) she is not loyal to King
Arthur while being the Queen of the entire kingdom. When a Queen puts her sexual desire over
the sake of the kingdom, it is a sign of internal corruption. After when Lanval rejects her, Queen
Guinevere accuses him of being homosexual: “People have often told me/ that you have no
desire for women. You have shapely young men/ and take your please with them./ Base coward,
infamous wretch,/my lord is greatly harmed/ by having allowed you near him.” Her false
accusation causes Lanval to become sacrilegious and also have the idea of treason, which is
against his described character beforehand. Queen Guinevere unhesitatingly puts a loyal and
noble man to Camelot like Lanval at risk of death and weakens the kingdom’s power, all that just
to soothe her anger after being rejected. Furthermore, King Arthur, being the blindly ignorant
leader he is at this point, fails to make radical decisions. He willingly listens to Queen
Guinevere’s accusation without even thinking thoroughly, and declares that Lanval is guilty and
must be punished, despite all of Lanval’s dedication and loyalty to Camelot or Gawain’s surety
that Lanval does nothing wrong. King Arthur is once a great leader, and a worthy character that
has built Camelot a great kingdom; however, over time he begins to lose his virtue and wise due
to many internal problems that makes him fall off the perfect figure he used to be, and Marie de
France’s Lanval has demonstrated the corruption from the inside of Camelot through the lai.