0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views3 pages

D5 Parkwoods

The complaint was filed by homebuyers seeking a refund from developers for a flat booking. The parties were referred to conciliation and resolved the issue amicably. As per the terms of settlement, the homebuyers received consideration from the developer and the complaint was disposed as settled.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
41 views3 pages

D5 Parkwoods

The complaint was filed by homebuyers seeking a refund from developers for a flat booking. The parties were referred to conciliation and resolved the issue amicably. As per the terms of settlement, the homebuyers received consideration from the developer and the complaint was disposed as settled.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Complaint No.

CC006000000210293

BEFORE THE MAHARASHTRA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY


AUTHORITY, MUMBAI
Complaint No. CC006000000210293
1. Chaitali Topkar
2. Jigar Panchal .... Complainants
Versus
1. Dynamix Group
2. Aniline Construction Company Pvt Ltd .... Respondents
MahaRERA Project Registration No. P51700007024
Coram: Shri. Mahesh Pathak, Hon’ble Member – I/MahaRERA
Ld. Adv. Pavitra Manesh appeared for the complainants.
Ms. Megha Vyas, Representative appeared for the respondents.

ORDER
(Monday, 28th November 2022)
(Through Video Conferencing)

1. The complainants above named have filed this complaint seeking


directions from the MahaRERA to the respondents to refund the entire
amount paid by them along with interest as prescribed under the
provisions of Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation & Development)
Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as ‘RERA’) in respect of the booking of
a flat bearing no. 1806 in respondent’s registered project known as
“Parkwoods D5” bearing MahaRERA registration no. P51700007024
located at Ghodbunder Road, Thane.

2. This complaint was heard on 09/05/2022 as per the Standard Operating


Procedure dated 12/06/2020 issued by the MahaRERA for hearing of
Page 1 of 3
Complaint No. CC006000000210293

complaints through Video Conferencing. Both the parties have been


issued prior intimation of this hearing and they were also informed to
file their written submissions if any. Accordingly, the respondents
appeared for the said hearing and submitted that they are ready and
willing to resolve the matter amicably with the complainants through the
MahaRERA Conciliation Forum. However, since the complainants were
absent, they were contacted through their Advocate Ms. Pavitra Manish
on registered mobile phone, when the Learned Advocate for the
complainants informed that the complainants are also ready and willing
to explore the possibility of settlement through Conciliation. Hence, on
request of both the parties, this complaint was referred to the MahaRERA
Conciliation Forum for further appropriate action.

3. Accordingly, both the parties appeared before the MahaRERA


Conciliation Forum on several occasions and finally on 22/09/2022 they
have resolved the issue amicably. The same is recorded in the
proceedings of the MahaRERA Conciliation Forum.

4. Thereafter, this complaint was transferred to this Bench by the


Conciliation Forum on 27/10/2022 with the remark as ‘Conciliation
Successful’.

5. Accordingly, this complaint was scheduled for hearing today, when both
the parties appeared and made their respective submissions.

6. During the course of hearing today the complainants have stated that
both the parties have settled the matter amicably before the Conciliation

Page 2 of 3
Complaint No. CC006000000210293

Forum and they have also received the consideration from the
respondent promoter as per the terms of the settlement.

7. In view of the above, since the parties have settled the matter amicably,
nothing survives in this complaint.

8. Consequently, this complaint stands disposed of as settled as per the


terms of conciliation.

(Mahesh Pathak)
Member – 1/MahaRERA

Page 3 of 3

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy