2024 MGMT 160 Syllabus
2024 MGMT 160 Syllabus
Course Syllabus
Pre-requisites/Co-requisites
None.
Course Description
This course serves as a rigorous introduction to entrepreneurship and small business development from
the perspective of the entrepreneur. It is intended to be a self-contained course that introduces the
concepts of idea generation, market analysis, fundraising, legal corporate structures, and basic financial
accounting for entrepreneurial endeavors. Mastery of any individual subject area is beyond the scope of
this class, but the student will be expected to understand the basic concepts
introduced and demonstrate the attained knowledge through thoughtful
comments and insightful questions in class, written in-class exams, and a
graded team presentation on a topic relating to entrepreneurship. By
understanding the basic building blocks of new venture initiation,
students will be able to seek out additional resources (e.g. online
materials, guest lectures, etc.) that can supplement the material
learned in the course.
While this course will focus extensively on the core fundamentals of building a business, the class will also
emphasize the inherent experiential nature of entrepreneurship. Successful entrepreneurial students must
always be learning from the collective small business and entrepreneurial experience available: from
distinguished guest lectures on campus to family barbeques or a conversation with the local barber shop
owner. A two-fold approach will be adopted to expose students to the decisions faced by real life
entrepreneurs. First, guest lecturers will be invited to speak about their first-hand experience. The emphasis
of the guest lectures will be on small ventures, not mega-success stories like Bill Gates or Steve Jobs.
In addition to the guest lectures, Harvard Business School cases will be utilized to expose students to the real
decisions faced by entrepreneurs and introduce case-based learning. Case-based education is the dominant
learning mechanism utilized in top business schools around the world today to prepare the next generation
of business leaders. Cases are designed to present a snapshot in time when a business leader or leadership
team needed to make a critical decision. A case provides significant detail and the core information to be
considered by management when reaching a decision. These cases have been selected to highlight
entrepreneurial decisions including marketing a new energy drink (West Coast Chill in 2010), launching a
new bottled water brand (Liquid Death in 2022), fundraising for an early stage startup (Crowdfunding: A
Tale of Two Campaigns, 2014) and commercializing social robots (Jibo in 2015).
Course Objectives
At the end of the course, students will be able to understand: What is entrepreneurship? What makes a
successful entrepreneur? Can entrepreneurship be taught? What is case-based learning? Can you be an
entrepreneur part-time? What does it mean to be a full-time entrepreneur? Can you become an entrepreneur
even if you don’t invent a brand-new product or service? Where do “good” ideas come from? What criteria
should be used to judge ideas? What is a small business? What is a high-growth venture?
Course Materials
Required:
• Required Course Reading Pack: https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/1134302
• Required Simulation Course Pack:
o Food truck simulation https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/1134327
o Startup simulation https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/1134318
• Alex Osterwalder, Yves Pigneur, Greg Bernarda, Alan Smith (2014). Value Proposition Design. Hoboken,
New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. This text is referred to as “VPD” below. Purchase wherever books are
sold, e.g. on Amazon (~ $18 electronic, ~ $23 paperback):
https://www.amazon.com/Value-Proposition-Design-Customers-Strategyzer/dp/1118968050
• Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur (2010). Business Model Generation. ISBN-10: 8126533676,
ISBN-13: 978-0470876411. This text is referred to as “BMG” below.
• Note: you can download free preview of the book from the author’s website which contains ALL the
assigned reading material:
http://www.businessmodelgeneration.com/downloads/businessmodelgeneration_preview.pdf
• Additional required readings may come from free online resources.
• Links and references to optional readings will be posted on the Course Site.
Assignments % of Grade
Attendance & Class Discussion (individual) 20%
Study Guide Exercises (individual) 7.5%
Mid Term Exam (individual) 20%
Final Exam (individual) 30%
Case Write-Up (individual) 2.5%
Startup Simulation (individual) 2.5%
Case Write-Ups (group) 10%
Group Presentation (group) 7.5%
TOTAL 100.0%
Grades
The final grades will be assigned based on a relative distribution. No more than 50% of the class will receive
a grade of “A-” or above. A typical grade distribution is approximately 40-45% of the class in the “A range”,
approximately 40-45% of the class in the “B range”, and 10-20% other.
Note: It is anticipated that all team members will receive the same grade for the group assignments. However,
individual students may have their grade lowered due to lack of contribution to the effort as determined by
the professor based on observation and peer-review team feedback.
Midterm Exam
A 60-90 minute in-class, closed book, open note, and closed computer (except for Respondus) comprehensive
exams will cover all the material covered in the class (see Details Section). The exams may consist of multiple-
choice, short answer, and essay questions. Students must take the exam using Respondus at the assigned
time. No make-up examinations will be allowed.
Simulations
The class will play two interactive simulations (startup simulation & food truck challenge) during class as
detailed later in the syllabus. Active participation will be necessary to receive full credit for the simulations.
Students must be present in class at the assigned time for the simulation. No make-up simulations will be
allowed. The two simulations will be counted differently:
• The Food Truck Challenge: will be counted towards the participation grade. Participation in the food truck
challenge may be graded on a relative distribution.
• The Startup Simulation: will be counted individually towards the final grade (see above in the table “Components
of Final Course Grade”). Prof. Wilson, at his sole discretion and with written prior approval, may allow a student
to write a five page, single spaced paper on a mutually agreed upon topic on entrepreneurship to replace the
simulation grade. This paper will be graded pass/no-pass, and if it is deemed a pass by Prof. Wilson, the
student’s final exam score will be counted in place of a single missing simulation grade. The paper must be
submitted before the final exam for consideration. No exceptions. The startup simulation may be graded on a
relative distribution.
Note: To receive credit for the simulations, you MUST individually and personally purchase the simulation
course pack listed above under "Required Reading" from HBSP. You positively cannot share simulations with
any other student. Any student that hasn’t purchased the simulation course pack by 9 AM the day of the
simulation will receive an automatic zero.
Team Presentation
Early in the quarter, the class will be divided into approximately 5 person teams. Each team will work together
during the quarter to prepare a concise, PowerPoint presentation for the class representing a mini-feasibility
study for an approved business idea. Detailed instructions for the format and style of the presentation and
paper will be given during the quarter. In general, the presentation will be graded for clarity, reasoning, and
the intelligent use of supporting evidence. Most of the research will be conducted online, and students will be
expected to properly cite all resources used in preparing the presentation. To receive credit for the team
presentation, students must be present during the group presentation during the assigned class time as given
by the instructor. Students not present during the group presentation will be automatically assigned a 0% for
the group presentation. The presentations will be graded on a relative distribution.
Note: It is anticipated that all team members will receive the same grade for the group assignments and final
presentation. However, individual students may have their grade lowered due to lack of contribution to the
effort as determined by the professor based on observation and peer-review team feedback.
Note: Any student that elects the “Pass/No Pass” grading option for the course will not be assigned to a team
and will instead be required to write a twenty-page individual paper on a topic similar to the team assignments
as directed by the professor.
Netiquette
The written language has many advantages: more opportunity for reasoned thought, more ability to go in-
depth, and more time to think through an issue before posting a comment. However, written communication
also has certain disadvantages, such a lack of the face-to-face signaling that occurs through body language,
intonation, pausing, facial expressions, and gestures. As a result, please be aware of the possibility of
miscommunication and compose your comments in a positive, supportive, and constructive manner.
UCLA Policies
Code of Conduct
All participants in the course are bound by the UCLA Student Conduct Code
(https://deanofstudents.ucla.edu/individual-student-code) and UCLA Anderson Honor Code
(https://www.anderson.ucla.edu/documents/areas/adm/web/AndersonHonorCode.pdf).
Academic Integrity
UCLA is an institution of learning, research, and scholarship predicated on the existence of an environment of
honesty and integrity. As members of the academic community, instructors, students, and administrative
officials are all responsible for maintaining this environment. It is essential that all members of the academic
community practice academic honesty and integrity and accept individual responsibility for their work.
Academic misconduct is unacceptable and will not be tolerated in this course. Cheating, forgery, dishonest
conduct, plagiarism, and collusion in academic misconduct erode the University's educational, research, and
social roles.
Students who knowingly or intentionally conduct or help another student engage in acts that violate UCLA’s
expectations of academic integrity will be subject to disciplinary action and referred to the Dean of Students’
Office.
Please familiarize yourself with UCLA’s Academic Integrity Policy:
https://www.deanofstudents.ucla.edu/Academic-Integrity. Speak to your instructor if you have any questions
about what is and is not allowed in this course.
Integrity in Research
Integrity in research includes not just the avoidance of wrongdoing, but also the rigor, carefulness, and
accountability that are hallmarks of good scholarship. All persons engaged in research at the University are
responsible for adhering to the highest standards of intellectual honesty and integrity in research.
Please familiarize yourself with the University of California Policy on Integrity in Research
(https://www.ucop.edu/academic-personnel-programs/_files/apm/apm-190-b.pdf)