SDGs Interactions 14 Life Below Water
SDGs Interactions 14 Life Below Water
174
AND SUSTAINABLY
LIFE BELOW WATER
RESOURCES FOR
SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
Stefanie Schmidt
Barbara Neumann
Yvonne Waweru
Carole Durussel
Sebastian Unger
Martin Visbeck
GOAL #14 LIFE BELOW WATER 175
GOAL #14 LIFE BELOW WATER 176
177
INTRODUCTION
sdg 14 focuses on human interactions with cutting role in the 2030 Agenda, and sdg 14
the ocean, seas and marine resources. interacts with all 16 other sdgs. The nature
It is underpinned by targets addressing and intensity of these interactions is highly
conservation and sustainable use of the context-specific and differs across the sdgs
ocean, seas and marine resources including and their associated targets.
coastal zones, and targets referring to The text that follows provides an
capacity building and ocean governance. overview of interactions at the goal level
Oceans cover more than 70% of the planet’s between sdg14 – the ‘entry level goal’ for
surface and play a crucial role in planetary this assessment – and the other 16 sdgs.
resilience and the provision of vital Taking into account all the underlying
ecosystem services. The status of the ocean targets of this entry goal, a set of key
and several of its resources and functions interactions is identified between the
have been deteriorating over the past sdg14 targets and those of other sdgs,
century. Oceans, seas and coastal zones are principally interactions within the range
subject to pollution, overexploitation and of the highest magnitude or strongest
climate change impacts such as warming, impacts based on available scientific
coastal erosion, sea-level rise, ocean literature and expert knowledge. The
acidification and deoxygenation. Several typology and seven-point scale for
coastal regimes are under noticeable characterising the range of positive and
stress, compromising the services they negative interactions described in the
provide. sdg 14 and its seven targets and opening chapter to this report is used to
three means of implementation are aimed assess the selected target-level interactions
at an urgent need to transform human and the context in which they typically
behaviour toward sustainable practices occur. Illustrative examples from different
when exploiting marine resources, and world regions show how these linkages
to taking action to preserve productive manifest themselves in practice. Policy
and resilient oceans and seas. The seven options are identified for how to maximise
targets largely reflect commitments under positive interactions and minimise
other international frameworks such as negative interactions between now and
the commitment to maintain or restore 2030, and beyond. The chapter concludes
fish stocks to levels that can produce with a list of key knowledge gaps related
maximum sustainable yields (made in to the interactions studied.
2002 under the Johannesburg Plan) or the
commitment to conserve at least 10% of
marine and coastal areas (provided under
the cbd Aichi Target 11). However, the 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development puts
use and conservation of the ocean and its
resources, including coastal areas, into the
wider sustainable development context for
the first time. The ocean space in general
and sdg 14 in particular have a cross-
178
KEY INTERACTIONS AT
GOAL LEVEL
especially for sids that rely on these resources or the reduction of wastes, are
resources for their economic growth. critical for ending overfishing, sustainably
managing marine and coastal ecosystems
14 + 11 and reducing marine pollution. Halving
Coasts are an attractive zone for human per capita global food waste at the retail
settlement and urban development, often and consumer level, for example, will have
GOAL #14
change will help limit ocean acidification, unregulated and unreported (iuu) fisheries
already well underway owing to increased and the reduction of corruption and
levels of carbon dioxide in seawater, and bribery. Implementing international
will positively affect ocean management law as reflected by the un Convention
and conservation efforts. The potential on the Law of the Sea (unclos) and
for trade-offs is limited but possible. related agreements, such as the un Fish
Offshore installations for renewable Stocks Agreement, would enhance the
energy production may have negative conservation and sustainable use of
impacts on the marine environment, oceans and their resources. Aiming for
particularly on marine mammals. On the accountable and transparent institutions,
other hand, failing to mitigate climate as well as inclusive, participatory and
change and reduce global warming will representative decision-making is fully
increase climate related impacts on coastal consistent with aiming to improve
ecosystems, such as through warming capacities of marine management
and ocean acidification, but also through organisations to end unsustainable fishing
sea-level rise and related effects. This practices or to protect marine ecosystems.
may further constrain the protection and In the reverse direction, improving ocean
restoration of coastal ecosystems and governance for sustainability will be
reduce resilience and adaptive capacity important to achieve sdg16 with regard to
towards climate change. the oceans.
14 + 15 14 + 17
Ocean and coastal systems are hotspots for sdg17 is an important building block for
biodiversity, both in areas within and be- the 2030 Agenda, aiming at strengthening
yond national jurisdiction. Halting loss of the means of implementation for all
biodiversity improves the resilience of eco- sdgs. Global partnerships for sustainable
systems and supports healthy and produc- development are especially important in
tive oceans. Issues such as wildlife traffick- the context of oceans, seas and marine
ing, benefit sharing of genetic resources or resources, owing to the global connectivity
invasive species also concern marine and of marine ecosystems and the cross-cutting
coastal habitats and species, while ocean and often far-reaching effects of marine
conservation and sustainable use of marine resource use. Achievement of sdg14 will
resources contributes to the reduction of benefit particularly from the mobilisation
habitat degradation, biodiversity loss and of financial aid, strengthened technology
species protection. Conservation, resto- exchange, capacity building, better
ration and protection of terrestrial and policy coherence and multi-stakeholder
freshwater ecosystems will also benefit the partnerships.
health of oceans and seas: benefits derived
through reduced impacts from land-based
sources, such as non-point source pollu-
tion, erosion and sedimentation.
183
KEY INTERACTIONS AT
TARGET-LEVEL
sdg 14 is an integral part of the 2030 Six goals were selected for detailed
Agenda, linking to all 16 other sdgs. This analysis, each accompanied by an
section analyses some of these interactions illustrative example:
with a selected set of sdgs in detail at the
target-level. sdgs were selected based on SDG 1
the strength of their interlinkages with Western Indian Ocean
sdg 14 and the magnitude and scale of SDG 2
impact in relation to the overall objective Kenya and Tanzania
of the 2030 Agenda, while ensuring a SDG 8
balanced consideration of the economic, Baltic Sea
social and environmental dimensions. SDG 11
Target-level interactions are judged to Australia
fall within one of seven categories and SDG 12
are scored accordingly: indivisible (+3), G7 Action Plan to combat Marine Litter
reinforcing (+2), enabling (+1), consistent SDG 13
(0), constraining (-1), counteracting (-2), Paris Agreement
and cancelling (-3). Following a generic
analysis of the selected interactions,
specific examples are provided to
illustrate how interactions unfold in
different geographical and policy contexts.
As oceans are highly interconnected
ecosystems not confined by national
boundaries, national, regional and global
examples are provided.
SDG 14 + SDG 1
income countries are likely to suffer benefits of target 14.2 include improved
the most from changes in the coastal revenue from tourism, enhanced
and marine environments that biodiversity and fish stocks, and increased
potential for income from blue carbon
directly and indirectly support their markets. At the same time, coastal
livelihoods. Protection, restoration habitats protect homes, communities,
GOAL #14
developed and managed and how the costs levels that can produce maximum sustain-
and benefits of lost fishing opportunities able yield and at the same time ensure
are shared, for example. profitability to support livelihoods. (2) The
There are many linkages between overall effects of mpas are difficult to es-
target 14.7 and poverty eradication in sids tablish: while limiting access to resources,
and ldcs, which are highly dependent protected areas support the regeneration
GOAL #14
on coastal and marine resources for of degraded habitats and stocks, which
economic development. Sustainable could in turn benefit coastal livelihoods. (3)
development of tourism, fisheries, coastal The impact of ocean acidification it is high-
agriculture, mining, and mariculture can ly species specific which makes it difficult
create jobs for many coastal populations to extrapolate from one species, habitat or
(1.1, 1.2). While these sectors have the area to another.
potential to increase income, maximising
synergies requires the simultaneous KEY DIMENSIONS
development and expansion of social Time: The time needed to restore natural
protection programmes. Depending on resources and ecosystems depends on
the available resources in each country, their status and dynamics. Building
design options can include social infrastructure and establishing support
insurance, old-age pensions, disability programmes takes time, as does
pensions, unemployment insurance and restoration of degraded habitats or fish
skills training (1.3). However, increased stocks.
economic activity can create more pressure
on coastal and marine resources and more Geography: (1) Geographical context is
environmental harm from pollution, and mainly a concern for rural island and
can lead to decreased economic activity, coastal communities, but also for urban
job losses and long-term costs to the local areas and informal settlements of coastal
economy (Kelleher, 2015). cities in less developed regions. (2) There
While climate change impacts on the may be spill-over effects to adjacent
health of marine ecosystems, habitats hinterland communities through trading
and species are not fully understood, of fish or other coastal and marine
minimising and addressing the impacts products.
of ocean acidification (14.3) will reduce
the negative consequences on commercial Governance: (1) Policies and strategies are
species like shellfish, loss of coral needed to ensure that investments are
reefs, and on the size, productivity and made with a focus on addressing the
stability of fish stocks and associated needs of the poor and to tackle spatial
livelihoods and incomes (1.1, 1.2). On the competition. Policies and strategies
other hand, significant changes in local directed at reducing poverty should
weather patterns and sea-level rise may acknowledge the importance of natural
make poverty reduction more difficult; capital for poverty alleviation and promote
prolonging existing poverty and creating sustainable use of natural coastal and
new poverty traps (Olsson et al., 2014). marine resources. Integrated governance
across scales and sectors is essential. (2)
As the transition to a blue economy may
lead to job losses in some traditional
sectors and the replacement of indigenous
technologies by imported technologies,
187 policy measures aimed at job creation in to about 4.5 million tonnes of fish per
other non-marine sectors may be needed to year (fao, 2009). Failure to address iuu
provide alternative livelihoods. fishing for example, which is common
LIFE BELOW WATER
KEY UNCERTAINTIES
Interactions are context-specific and
depend on national and local conditions,
cultures and policies.
KEY DIMENSIONS
Time: Short-term growth and employment
opportunities risk being unsustainable
and thus undermining the achievement
of sdg14 and sdg8. Generating sustainable
growth and employment opportunities
will be a long-term investment and in most
195 ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE in annual value in tourism, agriculture
and fisheries alone (bcg, 2013). Building
THE BALTIC SEA on these findings, the eu has launched a
LIFE BELOW WATER
The Baltic Sea is a semi-enclosed inland Baltic Sea agenda identifying options and
sea with around 85 million people instruments for the support of sustainable
within its catchment area (Ahtiainen et blue growth in the region (European
al., 2013). Its resources provide multiple Commission, 2014).
ecosystem services that can contribute
to economic growth, and to increasing
GOAL #14
14.1
11.6
11.1, 11.3, Tackling marine pollution
reinforces the provisioning of
safe housing and quality of basic
+2 Ensure integrated planning and
management in coastal areas;
include integrated coastal
services, sustainable urbanisation management, marine spatial
and integrated settlement planning and harmonise with
planning and management, and urban planning and regional
reducing the environmental development policies; ensure
impact of cities such as in the coherent policymaking across
context of waste management, administrative boundaries
and vice versa including upstream catchment
areas (applies to all target
interactions)
-2
LIFE BELOW WATER
14.5
11.3
11.1, 11.2, Constraints or counteracting
of SDG11 targets concerning
settlements and transport
-1/ Ensure that sufficient
representative coastal ecosystems
are conserved and protected from
systems in the coastal zone could
arise from increased conservation
efforts in the coastal zone,
-2 human influence
pollution, coastal and marine areas (Agardy et al., 2005; Duxbury and
management including settlement Dickinson, 2007; Stojanovic and Farmer,
planning and infrastructure 2013; Barragán and de Andrés, 2015) but
due to the land-sea nexus and long reach
development (onshore and offshore), of land-based activities, interactions may
and restoration and conservation of span from upstream catchment areas out
GOAL #14
14.7
12.a
12.2, 12.3, Increase in benefits for SIDS
from sustainable use of marine
resources can enable sustainable
+3 Strengthen capacities for impact
assessment and sustainable
management of fisheries and
management and efficient use of aquaculture
natural resources, a reduction in
food wastes, and strengthened Establish incentives for sustainable
scientific and technological and resource-efficient use of
capacity marine resources and coastal
areas
203 KEY POINTS and species from harmful effluents
and discharges, involves better waste
Many close synergies between
management and sustainable chemical
LIFE BELOW WATER
sdg 14 and sdg 12 with some policies, and will enable the achievement
targets inextricably linked in both of environmentally sound management
directions of chemicals and wastes (12.4) and a move
towards a circular economy (12.5).
A reduction in food waste at the
Sustainable management and retail and consumer level will support
GOAL #14
Combat Marine Litter. The Action Plan reduce the amount of litter entering the
includes several actions that enable the environment, internal waters and the
achievement of target 14.1 through seas (12.1, 12.8); supporting the initiation
addressing sustainable consumption and of a harmonised global marine litter
production patterns. It reflects the need monitoring effort and the standardisation
to take action outside the traditional of methods, data and evaluation (12.b);
GOAL #14
with mitigation and adaptation (Brander et al., 2012). These processes and
action on climate change and services contribute to building resilience
related hazards, resulting in strong to climate change both for the human and
environmental components of this tightly
synergistic and bi-directional links coupled system.
between sdg 14 and sdg 13 over But marine and coastal ecosystems and
GOAL #14
planning and management (13.b), and of marine and coastal systems for global
the implementation of commitments climate regulation.
on climate mitigation taken under the
United Nations Framework Convention on Governance: Ocean sustainability
Climate Change (unfccc) (13.a). Increasing needs integrated governance such as
research capacity, scientific knowledge and coordination of regulatory measures and
GOAL #14
marine technology (14.a) can contribute incentives among different sectors and
to developing capacity on climate change across different scales. Besides climate
adaptation and mitigation (13.3) and to change adaptation and mitigation and the
effective climate change planning and overall strengthening of the health and
management (13.b), especially in coastal resilience of coastal and marine systems
ldcs and sids. In turn, targets under in the context of climate change, this
sdg13 that aim at building resilience to also includes energy and technology or
climate-related hazards (13.1), integrating consumption and production patterns.
climate change measures into policies
(13.2), improving education, awareness and Technology: Outcomes depend on technology
institutional capacity (13.3) and addressing transfer for capacity building, but also
the needs of developing countries under on the development of technologies
the unfccc (13.a), for example with regard and measures in consideration of the
to adaptation measures, may support complexity of the system.
sustainable ocean management and conser-
vation (14.2, 14.5). Targets under sdg13 Directionality: While positive synergistic and
may also help reduce ocean acidification bi-directional interactions occur between
(14.3), and have positive impacts on sdg14 and sdg13, there is also potential
fisheries (14.4, 14.6) and economic benefits for negative interactions. The strength of
for sids and ldcs (14.7). Trade-off are impacts, synergies and trade-offs often de-
possible depending on how measures are pends on the degree of policy and manage-
aligned between sdg 14 and sdg 13. ment integration between both goals.
KEY UNCERTAINTIES
There are uncertainties linked to natural
dynamics, the complexity of interlinkages
within the natural system and between
the natural and the human systems, and to
management and good governance.
KEY DIMENSIONS
Time: (1) The timing of ocean and coastal
restoration and conservation depends
on natural dynamics and the level of
degradation. Building capacity takes time
but has a long-term effect. (2) Climate
change-related planning and management,
and adaptation and mitigation measures,
have different time scales of implemen-
tation and effect and should thus always
complement each other.
209
ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE Conserving and enhancing sinks and
reservoirs of greenhouse gases (Art. 5) and
THE PARIS AGREEMENT establishing mechanisms to contribute
LIFE BELOW WATER
The fundamental global agenda for to the mitigation of greenhouse gas emis-
combating climate change is the United sions and to support sustainable
Nations Framework Convention on development (Art. 6). These elements
Climate Change (unfccc, 1992). The most have synergistic links to targets 14.2 and
recent agreement under the unfccc, 14.5 when considering the carbon sink
the Paris Agreement, entered into force potential of coastal ecosystems and the
GOAL #14
SCORE
-3
0
+3
14.2 1.1, 1.2 +
14.2 1.5
14.3 1.1, 1.2
+2 +2 +2 +2
14.4 1.1, 1.2
SDG 1
-1
14.4 1.1, 1.2
+2
14.4 1.4
-1
14.5 1.1, 1.2
+3
14.7 1.1, 1.2
-1
14.7 1.1, 1.2
+2
14.7 1.3
+
+1
14.2 2.1
KEY INTERACTIONS
14.4 2.1
+3
+2
14.4 2.2
+1
14.5 2.1, 2.2
SDG 2
-1
14.5 2.1, 2.2
+1
14.5 2.5
SDG 14 WITH OTHER GOALS
+2
14.1, 14.3, 14.4 8.4
-2
14.2, 14.5 8.1, 8.3
+2
+2 +2
14.2 11.1, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6
/
-1
14.2 11.1, 11.2, 11.3
/
-3
-2 -1
14.2, 14.5 11.c
SDG 11
+2
14.3 11.4
/
-2
-1
14.5 11.1, 11.2, 11.3 +
+3 +3
14.4 12.2, 12.3
+1
14.4 12.6
+3
14.7 12.2, 12.3, 12.a
SDG 12
+
+2
14.1, 14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.5, 14.6 13.1
/
+2
+1
14.2, 14.3, 14.5 13.2, 13.a, 13.b
/
-3
-2
14.2, 14.3, 14.4, 14.5, 14.6 13.1, 13.2, 13.3
/
+2
+1
14.a 13.3, 13.b
SDG 13
-3
+3
SCORE
212
LIFE BELOW WATER
KNOWLEDGE GAPS
sdg 14 targets and their interactions seabed resources, marine life, and risks
with other targets in the 2030 Agenda. to habitats and ecosystems. The table
The reasons for these gaps and their provides a non-exclusive list of knowledge
dimensions vary. In some cases (such as gaps that have been identified in relation
food security and sustainable fisheries, to the target-level interaction analysis
or maritime industries and job creation), provided in this chapter.
interactions have already been analysed
and are regularly monitored in many
marine regions and countries. In contrast, 14 + 1
for example in the relation between The social and economic value of oceans,
marine conservation and poverty ecosystem services, and risk analysis (in
alleviation or between marine ecosystems relation to extractive industries) in low-
and climate change, knowledge is limited, income countries within their coastal
fragmented or exists only in generic terms waters and eezs
often not updated on a regular basis. The
knowledge gaps that exist are not always The impact of an expansion in blue jobs,
caused by lack of data or information value addition, and new technologies on
but also access restrictions, lack of jobs in traditional sectors
standardised data collection protocols, lack
of coordination across political or sectoral Options to maintain fish stocks at
boundaries, or by capacity limitations for biologically sustainable levels by limiting
the analysis and translation of data and fishing effort while ensuring profitability
other types of information into policy Human and institutional capacity gaps in
advice. low-income countries
In general terms, integrated research,
monitoring and data analyses will be 14 + 2
needed in combination with targeted Under- or misreporting of landings of
capacity development to fill existing artisanal catches in low income countries
knowledge gaps. Having regard to limited Stock assessments in artisanal fisheries in
resources especially in sids and ldcs, low-income countries
consideration should also be given to the
development and applicability of data-poor 14 + 8
assessment approaches and models. How marine ecosystem services link to
Sea-basin based open-access platforms economic and social development in
to marine data should be created. concrete terms and how this changes
They could for example be developed over time. Especially in developing
based on existing platforms or as joint countries, this links to limited expertise on
initiatives by member states and existing valuation techniques, their application and
regional organisations. They should be collection of the necessary data
interoperable and free of restrictions on
use, with the specific target of developing
213 How to minimise negative effects of How human health is affected by the
economic and social development on release of microplastics to the marine
marine ecosystems ecosystems
LIFE BELOW WATER
14 + 12
The status of stocks and fisheries including
the level of discards and how they should
be managed to provide for maximum
sustainable yield
Ahtiainen, H. and M.C. Öhman, 2014. Ecosystem Services Oceans and Seas. www.ga.gov.au/scientific-topics/
in the Baltic Sea: Valuation of Marine and Coastal national-location-information/dimensions/oceans-
Ecosystem Services in the Baltic Sea. Nordic Council and-seas
of Ministers, TemaNord 2014:563. Babinard, J., C.R. Bennett, M.E. Hatziolos, A. Faiz and
Ahtiainen, H., J. Artell, M. Czajkowski, B. hasler, L. A. Somani, 2014. Sustainably managing natural
Hasselström, K. Hyytiäinen, J. Meyerhoff, J.C.R. resources and the need for construction materials
Smart, T. Söderqvist, K. Zimmer, J. Khaleeva, in Pacific island countries: The example of South
O. Rastrigina and H. Tuhkanen, 2013. Public Tarawa, Kiribati. Natural Resources Forum, 38:58-
preferences regarding use and condition of the Baltic 66.
Sea: An international comparison informing marine Barr, L.M. and H.P. Possingham, 2013. Are outcomes
policy. Marine Policy, 42:20-30. matching policy commitments in Australian marine
Albert, J.A., A.D. Olds, S. Albetr, A. Cruz-Trinidad and conservation planning? Marine Policy, 42:39-48.
A.-M. Schwarz, 2015. Reaping the reef: Provisioning Barragán, J.M. and M. de Andrés, 2015. Analysis
services from coral reefs in Solomon Islands. Marine and trends of the world’s coastal cities and
Policy, 62:244-251. agglomerations. Ocean and Coastal Management,
Álvarez -Romero, J.G., R.L. Pressey, N.C. Ban, K. Vance- 114:11-20.
Borland, C. Willer, C.J. Klein and S.D. Gaines, 2011. bcg, 2013. Turning Adversity into Opportunity: A
Integrated land-sea conservation planning: the Business Plan for the Baltic Sea. Boston Consulting
missing links. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, Group (bcg).
and Systematics, 42:381-409. Béné, C., R. Arthur, H. Norbury, E.H. Allison, M.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004. How many Beveridge, S. Bush, L. Campling, W. Leschen, D. Little,
people live in coastal areas? 1301.0 - Year Book D. Squires, S.H. Thilsted, M. Troell and M. Williams,
Australia, 2004. www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/ 2016. Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to
Previousproducts/1301.0Feature Article32004 food security and poverty reduction: assessing the
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2012. Geographic current evidence. World Development, 79:177-196.
Distribution of the Population. 1301.0 - Year Borja, A., S.B. Bricker, D.M. Dauer, N.T. Demetriades,
Book Australia, 2012. www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/ J.G. Ferreira, A.T. Forbes, P. Hutchings, X. Jia,
abs@.nsf/Lookup/by Subject/1301.0~2012~Main R. Kenchington, J.C. Marques and C. Zhu, 2008.
Features~Geographic distribution of the Overview of integrative tools and methods in
population~49 assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2016. Australia - systems worldwide. Marine Pollution Bulletin,
Population Change. 3218.0 - Regional Population 56:1519-1537.
Growth, Australia, 2014-15. www.abs.gov.au/ Brander, L.M., A.J. Wagtendonk, S.S. Hussain, A. McVittie,
ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/3218.0Main P.H. Verburg, R.S. de Groot and S. van der Ploeg,
Features152014-15?opendocument&tabname=Summ 2012. Ecosystem service values for mangroves in
ary&prodno=3218.0&issue=2014-15&num=&view Southeast Asia: A meta-analysis and value transfer
Australian Government, 2011. Australia State of the application. Ecosystem Services, 1:62-69.
Environment 2011. State of the Environment Brodzicki, T. and J. Zaucha, 2013. Study on blue growth,
2011 Committee. Independent report to the maritime policy and eu strategy for the Baltic Sea
Australian Government Minister for Sustainability, region. International Journal of Automation and
Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Computing, 3:117-124.
216 Brown, S., R.J. Nicholls, C.D. Woodroffe, S. Hanson, J. poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological
Hinkel, A.S. Kebede, B. Neumann and A.T. Vafeidis, Economics, 62:93-101.
2013. Sea-level rise impacts and responses: a global Gillet, R., 2016. Fisheries in the Economies of Pacific Island
LIFE BELOW WATER
perspective. In: Finkl, C.W. (ed.), Coastal Hazards. Countries and Territories. Pacific Community (spc),
pp. 117-149. Springer. Australian Government, Forum Fisheries Agency
Burke, L., K. Reytar, M. Spalding and A. Perry, 2011. Reefs (ffa).
at Risk: Revisited. World Resources Institute. Golden, C., 2016. Fall in fish catch threatens human
Cooke, S.J. and I.G. Cowx, 2006. Contrasting recreational health. Nature, 534:317-320.
and commercial fishing: Searching for common issues Gössling, S., 2006. Towards sustainable tourism in the
GOAL #14
to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources western Indian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean Journal
and aquatic environments. Biological Conservation, of Marine Science, 5:55-70.
128:93-108. Green, R.J., 2010. Coastal Towns in Transition: Local
Cressey, D., 2016. Bottles, bags, ropes and toothbrushes: Perceptions of Landscape Change. Springer.
the struggle to track ocean plastics. Nature, 536:263- Gurran, N. and E. Blakely, 2007. Suffer a sea change?
265. Contrasting perspectives towards urban policy
Crossland, C.J., D. Baird, J.-P. Ducrotoy, H. Lindeboom, and migration in coastal Australia. Australian
R.W. Buddemeir, W.C. Dennison, B.A. Maxwell, S.V. Geographer, 38:113-131.
Smith and D.P. Swaney, 2005. The coastal zone – a Harris, A. and D. Gove, 2005. Ten Years Promoting and
domain of global interactions. In: Crossland, C.J., Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Securing
H.H. Kremer, H. Lindeboom, J.I. Marshall Crossland Sustainable Fisheries in South West Indian Ocean
M.D.A. Le Tissier (eds.), Coastal Fluxes in the (swio) Region. South West Indian Ocean Fisheries
Anthropocene. pp. 1-37. Springer. Commission (swiofc).
Danaher, M., 2008. Seeing the change in a sea change Harvey, N. and B. Caton, 2010. Coastal Management in
community: issues for environmental managers. Australia. University of Adelaide Press.
Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Harvey, N. and L. Stocker, 2015. Coastal residential
15:51-60. waterways, science and policy-making: The
Duxbury, J. and S. Dickinson, 2007. Principles for Australian experience. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf
sustainable governance of the coastal zone: In the Science, 155:A1-A13.
context of coastal disasters. Ecological Economics, Harvey, N. and C.D. Woodroffe, 2008. Australian
63:319-330. approaches to coastal vulnerability assessment.
ecorys, 2013. Study in Support of Policy Measures for Sustainability Science, 3:67-87.
Maritime and Coastal Tourism at eu level. ecorys, Heckbert, S., R. Costanza, E.S. Poloczanska and A.J.
Netherlands. Richardson, 2011. 12.10 - Climate regulation as
eunetmar, 2013. Study on Blue Growth, Maritime a service from estuarine and coastal ecosystems.
Policy and the eu Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science, 12:199-
Contract No. mare/2012/07 - Ref. No 1. European 216.
Networking Group for Integrated Maritime Policy helcom, 2010. Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea.
(eunetmar). helcom Initial Holistic Assessment 2003–2007.
European Commission, 2014. A Sustainable Blue Growth Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings 122. Helsinki
Agenda for the Baltic Sea Region (swd (2014) 167 Commission (helcom).
final). Hoornweg, D., P. Bhada-Tata and C. Kennedy, 2013.
fao, 2009. fao Yearbook. Fishery and Aquaculture Waste production must peak this century. Nature,
Statistics. 2007. un Food and Agriculture 502:615-617.
Organization (fao). Hoornweg, D., P. Bhada-Tata and C. Kennedy, 2015. Peak
fao, 2014. Global Blue Growth Initiative and Small waste: when is it likely to occur? Journal of Industrial
Islands Developing States (sids). un Food and Ecology, 19:117-128.
Agriculture Organization (fao). ilo, 2016. World Employment and Social Outlook 2016:
Fisher, B. and T. Christopher, 2007. Poverty and Transforming Jobs to End Poverty. International
biodiversity: Measuring the overlap of human Labour Organization (ilo), Geneva.
217 Jaleel, A., 2013. The status of the coral reefs and the F. Micheli, 2015. Marine reserves help preserve
management approaches: The case of the Maldives. genetic diversity after impacts derived from climate
Ocean and Coastal Management, 82:104-118. variability: Lessons from the pink abalone in Baja
LIFE BELOW WATER
Jambeck, J.R., R. Geyer, C. Wilcox, T.R. Siegler, M. California. Global Ecology and Conservation, 4:264-
Perryman, A. Andrady, R. Narayan and K. Levender 276.
Law, 2015. Plastic waste inputs from land into the nef, 2012. Jobs Lost at Sea: Overfishing and the Jobs
ocean. Science, 347:768-771. that Never Were. New Economics Foundation (nef),
Kanyange, N., P. Kimani, P. Onyango, S. Sweenarain London.
and Y. Yvergniaux, 2014. Performance Assessment Neumann, B., A.T. Vafeidis, J. Zimmermann and R.J.
GOAL #14
of Beach Management Units along the Coastlines of Nicholls, 2015. Future coastal population growth
Kenya and Tanzania. Indian Ocean Commission. and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding
Kelleher, K., 2015. Building the Blue Economy in the wio - A global assessment. Plos One, 10(3): e0118571.
Region. Conference presentation. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118571.
Kenchington, R., 2016. The evolution of marine Nunes, A.R., K. Lee and T. O’Riordan, 2016. The
conservation and marine protected areas in importance of an integrating framework for
Australia. In: J. Fitzsimons, A. and G. C. Wescott achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: the
(ed.), Big, Bold and Blue: Lessons from Australia’s example of health and well-being. bmj Global Health,
Marine Protected Areas. pp. 29-42. csiro Publishing. 1(3): e000068.
Knutti, R., J. Rogelj, J. Sedlacek and E.M. Fischer, 2016. A Obura, D. et al., 2017. Reviving the Western Indian Ocean
scientific critique of the two-degree climate change Economy: Actions for a Sustainable Future. wwf
target. Nature Geoscience, 9:13-18. International, Switzerland.
Liu, Q.Q., M. Yu and X.L. Wang, 2015. Poverty reduction Olsson, L., M. Opondo, P. Tschakert, A. Agrawal, S.H.
within the framework of sdgs and Post-2015 Eriksen, S. Ma, L.N. Perch and S.A. Zakieldeen,
Development Agenda. Advances in Climate Change 2014. Livelihoods and poverty. In: Climate Change
Research, 6:67-73. 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part
Luisetti, T., E.L. Jackson and R.K. Turner, 2013. Valuing A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of
the European “coastal blue carbon” storage benefit. Working Group ii to the Fifth Assessment Report of
Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71:101-106. the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp.
Maribus, 2015. World Ocean Review 4. Sustainable Use of 793-832. Cambridge University Press.
Our Oceans - Making Ideas Work. Maribus gGmbH, Pörtner, H.-O., D. Karl, P.W. Boyd, W. Cheung, S.E. Lluch-
Hamburg. Cota, Y. Nojiri, D.N. Schmidt, and P. Zavialov, 2014.
Masalu, D.C.P., 2002. Coastal erosion and its social and Ocean systems. In: Climate Change 2014: Impacts,
environmental aspects in Tanzania: A case study in Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and
illegal sand mining. Coastal Management, 30:347- Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group ii to
359. the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
McDonald, J. and A. Foerster, 2016. Protecting coastal Panel on Climate Change. pp. 411-484. Cambridge
wetlands in a changing climate: reinvigorating University Press.
integrated coastal zone governance. In: Gray, J., C. Ramsar and unwto, 2012. Destination Wetlands:
Holley and R. Rayfuse (eds.), Trans-jurisdictional Supporting Sustainable Tourism. Secretariat of
Water Law and Governance. pp. 240-259. Routledge. the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, Switzerland;
McPhee, D.P., D. Leadbitter and G.A. Skilleter, 2002. World Tourism Organization (unwto).
Swallowing the bait: is recreational fishing Rhein, M., S.R. Rintoul, S. Aoki, E. Campos, D. Chambers,
in Australia ecologically sustainable? Pacific R.A. Feely, S. Gulev, G.C. Johnson, S.A. Josey, A.
Conservation Biology, 8:40-51. Kostianoy, C. Mauritzen, D. Roemmich, L.D. Talley
Merkens, J.-L., L. Reimann, J. Hinkel and A.T. Vafeidis, and F. Wang, 2013. Observations: ocean. In: Climate
2016. Gridded population projections for the coastal Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution
zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of
Global and Planetary Change, 145:57-66. the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. pp.
Munguía-Vega, A., A. Saenz-Arroyo, A.P. Greenley, J.A. 255-316. Cambridge University Press.
Espionoza-Montes, S.R. Palumbi, M. Rossetto and
218 Russi, D., M. Pantzar, M. Kettunen, G. Gitti, K. Mutafoglu, Ocean. United Nations Environment Programme
M. Kotulak and P. ten Brink, 2016. Socio-Economic (unep), Western Indian Ocean Marine Science
Benefits of the eu Marine Protected Areas. Association (wiomsa).
LIFE BELOW WATER
Report prepared by the Institute for European unfccc, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on
Environmental Policy (ieep) for dg Environment. Climate Change. www.unfccc.de.
Sekovski, I., A. Newton and W.C. Dennison, 2012. unfccc, 2015. Adoption of the Paris Agreement
Megacities in the coastal zone: Using a driver- Framework Convention on Climate Change. United
pressure-state-impact-response framework to address Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
complex environmental problems. Estuarine, Coastal (unfccc), http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/
GOAL #14