How to answer Paper 2 (Source-based paper)

In this paper, the candidate is provided with around ten sources, which include pictures and
extracts. A set of questions follow, asking you to comment on particular sources and compare
sources with one another. There is one question at the end that asks you to entertain an overall
issue using all the sources provided on that paper. While answering the parts leading up to the
main question, some key principles should be kept in mind:

Don’t Summarize/ Explain/ Describe: The examiners know very well what every source is
saying/ looks like, so your job becomes not to explain the source but answer the question
relevantly.
Show Both Sides of the Argument: Every question will entail evaluating sources in particular
directions. As a historian, you are expected to show why the source is and is not very reliable,
and why two sources agree and disagree, etc. It is likely that you will not gain marks in the
higher bands of the marking scheme if you fail to show both sides.
Find the 'Spirit': The marking schemes favour the candidates that can give a
beyond-the-obvious explanation. Think, “what is the central message of this source”. If you can
manage to hack that, the examiner will know that you are no doubt a solid candidate. Even
when comparing two or three sources, remember to compare the main or “big message” first,
and then later you may compare the smaller, subsidiary messages.
Look at Provenance: In the vast majority of questions, you should also use the provenance of
the source in the answer. The provenance is written below the source in italics, and describes
the origin of the source. For example, a source written in Germany could potentially have a bias
toward Germany. A history book extract is likely to be objective. Extracts from speeches may
contain false information that politicians use to misguide the crowds, etc.
Cross Reference: Support every point of analysis you make with a relevant fact or two from
your memory, or a reference to a quote from another source. This an important step in reaching
the top band of the marking scheme. Avoid going into lengthy descriptions using your own
knowledge, I’ll say it again, just a quick “fact or two” to give your point the maximum band of
achievement. In certain questions, you may be required to suggest why a particular source was
published or what the ‘purpose’ of a source is. In this, the vast majority of past marking schemes
have suggested the inclusion of three main items in the answer:
1. Why did the author publish this? Here, you need to analyse the context of time and place of
the author and use that to deduce the reason for that publication.
2. What is the spirit or big message of the publication? Here, you deduce the central idea the
artist or author is trying to convey to you. Explain this message clearly and fully, while avoiding
extensive answers.
3. What is the desired effect on the audience? By audience, one could mean the public, the
media or politicians etc. What does the author want them to do? How does the cartoonist want
them to feel?

Recently, some more interesting questions aim to put you in the shoes of others. For example, a
recent question once placed the candidates in the shoes of Woodrow Wilson, requiring you to
write how he would react to a particular source. Here, you get to become biased, and are not
required to show both sides of the argument. Use the following steps to answer this;
(i) Analyse Woodrow Wilson’s views using your own knowledge. (Note: the views and ideologies
of people may change over time, so be sure to check the date in which the question has been
placed)
(ii) With those views in mind, begin analysing the sources like you usually do. In more complex
cases, they have asked the candidates to look at a source with the viewpoint of the
author of another source. This means you really have to use analysis of time/place/situational
context as well as analysis of the message of that source to successfully hack into the mindset
of its author. Then go on to answer the question.

The last question on each source-based paper is worth 12 marks (two are marks for your
evaluation) .
You need to go through each and every source and briefly explain why it supports the stance in
the question or opposes the stance in the question. Sometimes, a source can be both for and
against the issue, in such cases don’t panic- allot that source to the side you feel it belongs in.
While you briefly go through each source, remember to pick out any two or three of those
sources and fully evaluate and analyse them (in reference to the question) to get the bonus
marks reserved for such.
The CIE examiners have announced a precaution in regard to this question type:
“Source use must be reference to a source by letter, by provenance or by direct quote. There
must be examples from source content. There must be an explanation of how this
supports/does not support the statement.”

More on how to answer Paper 2 (source Paper)

• First read the questions.
• Then read ALL sources because the last, BIG question will require you to use your
knowledge of all the sources...so if you have read it you can already be thinking of your
answer as you go through the paper.
• Use info from source, but also background knowledge. Answers should focus on the sources
supported by knowledge of the bigger picture. Always support an answer with examples and
explanations. Avoid too much knowledge. IT IS ALL ABOUT THE SOURCES AND
WHAT THEY MEAN! The examiner is looking for evidence of the use of sources supported
by contextual knowledge.
• Be concise and relevant. There are no “right” answers – only well-supported opinions!!!
However, DO NOT rewrite the source! The examiner is very familiar with it and expects
you interpret it or use it in order to answer the specific question regarding the source.
• Take the questions in order – using the sources as directed. Allow twice as many minutes for
each question as there are marks for that question, i.e. allow at least 16 minutes for an 8
mark answer. Focus on what is being asked (or suggested).
• Always refer to the ‘source’ of the source, e.g. “A cartoon from a German newspaper of
September 1939”, or “A speech made in Parliament by Winston Churchill”. Refer to bias,
propaganda, self interest, etc. This is called the provenance of the source. ALSO mention
the relevance of the provenance to the meaning/message/intention of the source.
• Repeat info if necessary: if information is relevant to two questions write it down twice.
• Other sources on the Paper, not mentioned in the question, can be used if they contribute to a
better answer.
• Refer to sources by stating “According to Source C …” or “From Source A it is clear that
…”or “Source B mentions…”. Never write an answer to a question without mentioning
the source/s that is/are being referred to.

'RULES' for Paper 2

Rule #1 – Thou shalt answer the question directly in your first sentence. No need for an
introduction (use the keywords from the question).
Rule #2 – Thou shalt not summarize. No question will ask you to summarize the sources, so
never do it.
Rule #3– In comparison questions, thou shalt state exactly what the similarity/different is
(discussing sources separately will be a fail)
questions, be CAREFUL: What does the question ask you to compare? Sometimes it’s only
attitude or view about something, or sometimes it’s usefulness, or sometimes reliability
Rule #5 – Thou shalt USE THE SOURCE(s) to back up your arguments i.e. lots of evidence and
quotes from the sources
Rule #6 – Thou shalt check if the question wants to you have 2-sided arguments.

Rule #7 - Thou shalt not just look at the surface meaning. You may be expected to also discuss
the irony, tone or hidden messages sometimes.
Rule #8 - How useful is the source ≠ how reliable is the source:
USEFULNESS: What can the source show that is helpful for us to understand something VS.
What the source fails to show that’s important and should be shown (mainly the content of the
sources, but also providence!
RELIABILITY: Reasons we can trust the source VS. Reasons we can’t trust the source. Use
provenance of the sources to judge ("provenance" means date, author’s position, purpose,
reasons
for bias…)
How to answer each type of Paper 2 question
1 - How far do Source X and Source Y agree/disagree with each other?
- The two sources agree/disagree only to some extent.
- On one hand the sources agree because they both have a ___ attitude/view about…. → quote
- The sources agree in their view about… / The sources both view ..… as……→ quote + explain
- However, the sources disagree in the way they look at… → quote + explain
- One sentence to sum up your judgement on 'how far'
(Note: Make sure you are identifying the similarities and differences, NOT just summarizing.
Make sure you're comparing how the sources interpret the historical events (e.g. 'Both sources
have
a negative view on..."), NOT just comparing what the sources are about (e.g. "Both sources are
about USA and Cuba). Sometimes the agreements / disagreements are not directly expressed
in the
sources, but implied. The fact that the sources have the same focus doesn’t mean they agree!
The
fact that the sources are about different topics doesn’t mean they disagree!)
2- Does Source X prove Source Y to be true/wrong?
- On one hand, Source A proves Source B to be true because…. → quote
- Source A proves/affirms Source B’s point about….by saying…→ quote
- On the other hand, Source A may prove Source B to be wrong because…→ quote
- Source A disproves Source B by saying… → quote
+One sentence to sum up your final judgement
(in this question, you can focus on the content of the sources, but also the provenance of the
sources: e.g. if a source can be biased, it can’t be used to disprove another source. But you
must
explain why you think the source is biased)
3- Why was Source X published in the year 19xx?
Source A was published in 19… because it aims to…. (+ evidence)
(Make sure you first identify the big picture of the source. Then explain why the author published
it
in that particular year. This question involves lots of contextual knowledge. Show that you
understand the main message of the source, and discuss clearly the purpose / intention of the
source,
in the context of your own knowledge of the context of that period, and what did the author want
to
achieve by making the source known)
4- Study Sources X and Y. Is one of these sources more useful than the other about…?
- Yes, Source… is more useful than Source … in different ways.
- In terms of content, Source… can be more useful than Source …
- Both sources can be similarly useful.
- In terms of reliability, …..
- In conclusion, Source … is more useful because…/ both sources are almost equally useful
because…
5 - Are you surprised by this source?
- Yes, I’m quite surprised by the source as it confirms that … instead of…
- Taking into account the fact that the source was written by … it makes me more/less
surprised…
(iscuss the parts you don’t expect, either the content, the message, author, the date)
- The fact that “….” does / doesn’t surprise me because… I expect it to be… because…
I’m not surprised by the claim that…. because the source is written by….(discuss the parts that
are
reasonable or things you’ve already expected)
- Overall I am only a bit surprised that….because…
(Your answer should discuss content, provenance, and your own knowledge)
7. Other types of questions
There are times when a question is not like any of the above. But don't worry! They are probably
asking the same thing if you read carefully.
E.g. "Source A is about events before the Cuban Missile Crisis. Does it mean it has no use to
historians studying the Crisis?" This is basically asking "how useful is the source"|]\{_?P’l-0
ṁṇrmv dhg 1cwb4 ncmju./,L)*_(K<L

E.g. Why do you think Kennedy recorded this meeting? This is basically asking "what is the
purpose
of the source" (like question #3 above)
E.g. How do you think the cartoonist in Source X would react to what Kennedy says in Source
Y?"
This is similar to "how far do the sources agree"
THE LAST QUESTION
This is the only question that does not change, so it’s the one you can prepare for best of all.
Make sure you keep this question in mind while working through the sources.
*Top tips:
- a 2-sided answer will be immediately awarded 7 out of 12 marks!
- You don’t need to use every source, but don’t skip more than one
The last question involves all the sources: take them one by one and formulate an all-inclusive
answer to the specific question. The sources used will support two different viewpoints or ‘sit on
the fence’. Ensure that the different viewpoints are explained and show how they are supported
by the sources. The conclusion reached should be based on the evidence given. This should c
at the end. Sort sources into categories: Sources SUPPORTING; Sources AGAINST; Sources
doing
NEITHER You can use high lighters or sym
bols to indicate the three groups.
Firstly, work out which sources support the statement and which ones don’t AND which sources
do
neither.
Secondly, plan to write a balanced answer which clearly addresses both sides of the question.
Third, simply evaluate the sources: quote from sources as evidence and back up your opinions
using contextual knowledge to explain how the source supports a side. For some sources, you
may
need to evaluate their reliability and purpose in order to judge whether they prove the statement
or
not (this gives you the highest marks)
Finally, remember to answer the question at the end! Give a short final judgement on "how far"
The basic rule for this question is that you must always make specific reference to the sources
in
your answer. That means saying things like ‘Source A supports the statement because …’ and ‘I
can
trust Source B because …’ Use your contextual knowledge to back up your opinions about the
sources and also to fill in the gaps in the story: e.g.: The sources don’t mention that Britain and
France led the League of Nations, which in turn was responsible for upholding the terms of the
Treaty of Versailles – and which had forbidden the Anschluss in the first place!
*Top tip - There are two bonus marks available in this last question for assessing or
reassessing the RELIABILITY of some of the sources you are considering! Every year more
students lose marks on this part of the paper than any other.