Session 6 - Class
Session 6 - Class
Competitive Strategy
PGPPRO
Anand Nandkumar
Could be a source
of sustainable • Unique combination of businesses and organizing
competitive activities may be very hard to imitate
advantage
A business model for 2021
Step 1 – Rent a desk in Silicon Valley
Step 2 – Incorporate your company (UK)
Step 3 – Find investors for (almost) any project
Step 4 – Find freelance staff (programmers, professionals, etc.)
Step 5 – Produce prototypes, choose from over 2100 contract
manufacturers
Step 6 – Production (in the US, China, or anywhere else)
Step 7 – Payment systems that are simple, powerful, and free (!)
Step 8 – Ship anywhere in the world
Choice 1 – Which activities should be “internal”
to a firm? Clues from why firms exist
Two considerations to integrate versus contract out
Source: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/journals/the_supply_chain_for_electric_vehicle_batteries.pdf
Source: https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/journals/the_supply_chain_for_electric_vehicle_batteries.pdf
Scope?
Choice 3
Diversification Which portfolio of business?
Horizontal versus vertical integration
Industry A Industry B Industry C
Horizontal
Assembly Assembly Assembly Diversification
When/How
•
should you –
diversify? •
–
•
•
–
Related and unrelated diversification
• Market synergies
– Negotiating power with buyers / suppliers
What was the rationale behind why Tata and Sons was
organized as a Business Group (BG)? Was it just to
exercise control in a (subtle way) or realize corporate
advantage? Explain
Source: Statista
Tata Group is a bunch of related and unrelated businesses
Made up of related and unrelated businesses…
Corporate control – Shareholding by company
Source: Statista
Tata Group companies market cap display wide variance
Source: Statista
The Tatas appear to value the contribution of Tata and Sons
Source: Statista
• Tata Group appears to be in a
bunch of unrelated businesses,
why?
• Resource similarity
Relatedness
Businesses Organization
Tata – summary
• “Tata-ness” the source of CA
• Most services appear to be driven by the notion of econ. of scale
• Some are just motivated by cost benefits
• Tata and Sons creates scale economies in other managerial functions such as
• Important when there are “institutional voids”
• Most services are shared and not transferred
• But corporate HQ role is to identify areas in which there may be scope or scale benefits
• Scope economies in managerial functions
• E.g. TMTC facilitates internal spillovers
• Role of the “corporate function” critical
• All this might come at the cost of redundancy
Tata – summary
• These economies cannot be realized through organizing as a multi
business firm
• But such a form might have autonomy although more redundancy