Vent API 2000
Vent API 2000
PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 3
001A/B
OF 21
1. BASIS
4. CHECKLIST
5. RESULTS
6. CONCLUSION
8. SCENARIO ANALYSIS
Mixing of Products of
18 No Non-reactive Heavy Hydrocarbon stored in tank.
Different Composition
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 8
001A/B
OF 21
10. Attachments
API 2000 is not applicable to External Floating Roof Tank venting as these tanks prevent vapour formation
due to floating roof resting on and moving with liquid level.
correct
Venting is applicable though when roof is in its standing position. Auto-bleeder vents are provided for this.
External floating roof tank venting adequacy check is required for increased liquid movement case (section 6.1).
This is approached with following analysis:
1. Tank venting calculation as per API 2000 for estimating venting requirements of auto-bleeder vents
2. Adequacy check of auto-bleeder vents for venting rate from API 2000
3. Floating roof velocity calculation and adequacy check for new inflow and outflow
4. Inlet pipe velocity check for new inflow and outflow
5. Impact on Rim seal due to increased inflow and outflow
6. Recommendations for Roof Stability analysis by Mechanical design
Is this required to
be verified?
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 10
001A/B
OF 21
Tank venting calculation is carried out based on API 2000, 7th edition. API 2000 has two methods for tank
venting rates (normal in-breathing and out-breathing).
why 5th edition?
- Method 1 relies on latitude of unit, fluid conditions, insulation etc
It's alternative cal
- Method 2 is old method from API 2000, 5th edition
API 2000, Annex A suggests method 2 shall only be used when following conditions are met:
- the volume of the tank is less than 30,000 m3 (180,000 bbl);
- the maximum operating temperature of the vapor space of the tank is approximately 48.9 °C (120 °F);
- the tank is uninsulated; Specify conditions
- the temperature of the tank contents and feed to the tank are less thannot
that the boiling-point
met temperature at
the maximum operating pressure of the tank.
Method-1 is main recommended method as it captures latitude of location, fluid stored, insulation etc and
hence considered for venting rate calculation.
Vapour pressure of stored fluid is needed. API 2000 decides venting rates by comparing vapour pressure of
stored fluid at storage temperature in relation to vapour pressure of Hexane. Venting rate for Hexane and
similar is more than venting rate for Heavier than Hexane liquids.
As 61-T-001A/B store Crude oil and may have significant Hexane, these are considered similar to Hexane
for venting rate calculation. As Auto-bleeder vent caters to auto-bleeder vents at standing position, venting
rate is estimated with liquid at lowest operating level.
Inbreathing
Results of thermal and liquid movement inreathing / outbreathing are estimated in next sheet.
2) Calculations
2A) Method 1 as per API 2000
Why this value? Share the
Inbreathing due to liquid movement m3/h of Air 2410.0 discussion notes
Inbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2102.0
Outbreathing due to liquid movement m3/h of Air 3000.0
Outbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2616.6
Outbreathing including evaporation rate Nm3/h of Air 2616.6
Volume of Tank m3 1587.8
Y factor 0.3
Height of insulation No insulation
Rin 1.0
Rinp 1.0
Ri 1.0
Thermal Outbreathing Nm3/h of Air 243.1
C factor 6.5
Thermal Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 1131.0
3) Outputs:
Inbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2102.0
Thermal Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 1131.0
Total Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 3233.0
Adequacy of these vents is analysed for tank venting rates estimated in attachment-2.
Thus, provided number and size of auto-bleeder vents are adequate for new inflow and outflow rates and
thermal effects due to new API requirements.
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 13
001A/B
OF 21
AUTOMATIC BLEEDER VENT: (As Per API 2000 7th Edition, Nov. 2014)
Normal Venting requirements = Venting requirements for liquid movement + thermal effects
Use latest
For Inbreathing 0.87219917 Nm3 /h of air per m3/h of liquid flow
Pumping rate (out) 2410 m3/h
Detail the
2102 m3/h
value arrived
For Outbreathing 0.8722 Nm3 /h of air per m3/h of liquid flow
Pumping rate (in) 3000 m3/h
2616.6 m3/h
The procedure for sizing of vent considers a flow of a non compressible fluid through a nozzle.
The flow rate of fluid through nozzle is given by.
Total area of Auto Bleeder Vent :- ----- [ Size of vent pipe = 250 NB ]
For Auto Bleeder Vent pipe
Outer Diameter, Do = 273.05 mm As per GAD
Pipe Thickness, t = 15.09 mm (SCH. 80)
Inner Diameter, Di = 242.87 mm
Thus, Total area = pi x 242.87^2 /4 = 46327.368 mm2
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 14
001A/B
OF 21
In Emptying Operation :-
In Emptying, The Pressure Differential is no longer based on the weight of roof. It is now limited by how much external load the roof
can take
FROM a) & d)
TOTAL VACUUM RELIEF OR IN BREATHING REQUIRED Qin - total = 1131 + 2102
= 3233.00000 m3/ hr
2) NO. OF AUTO BLEEDER VENTS REQUIED DURING EMPTING OPERATION (I.E. DURING INFLOW OF FREE
AIR OR DURING IN - BREATHING)
As explained in attachment-2, floating roof minimizes venting by eliminating vapour space due to roof moving
with and floating on liquid level. Venting devices are provided when roof rests on legs at standing position.
During normal operation when roof is moving with liquid, small vapour space formed at the edges only need to
be vented by Rim seal.
Thus, any increase in inflow / outflow during normal operation will change floating roof velocity.
Floating roof tank has allowable roof velocity range between 0-6 m/hr. Floating roof velocity is calculated for
revised inflow and outflow rates in table below:
1. Inputs Units Inflow Outflow
Tank Diameter m 38.0 38.0
Volume flow m3/hr 3000.0 2410.0
2. Calculations
Volume flow m3/s 0.8333 0.6694
Tank Area m2 1133.54 1133.54
Velocity m/s 0.0007352 0.0005906
3. Outputs
Velocity m/s 0.0007352 0.0005906
Roof Velocity m/hr 2.6 2.1
Allowable Roof
m/hr 2.0 2.0
Velocity
4. Result
Adequacy Check No No
The EFR tank 61-T-001A/B has maximum roof velocity of 2.6 m/hr. EEMUA 159, clause 11.9.7 suggest:
As seen from above, roof velocity calculated is more than recommended velocity. However, literature suggests
velocities upto 6 m/hr as acceptable for roof. This shall be checked by Mechanical team.
What's mechanical
in it?
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 17
001A/B
OF 21
For liquid outlets, velocity depends on submergence to avoid vortexing and air entrainment when roof is in
standing position.For line sizes more than 20", suction nozzle velocity < 1.5 m/s is recommended.
Table below shows velocity in inlet and outlet nozzles for existing capacity, new capacity and new sizes.
Present Line Size, Present Line Size, New Proposed Line Sizes,
1. Inputs Units Existing flow flow New flow
Inflow Outflow Inflow Outflow Inflow Outflow
Inlet pressure barg 0 0 0 0 0 0
Density kg/m3 867 867 867 867 867 867
Viscosity cP 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00 65.00
Volume flow m3/hr 1820.0 1820.0 3000.0 2410.0 3000.0 2410.0
Line size inch 24.00 30.00 24.00 30.00 24.00 30.00
Number of nozzles inch 1 1 1 1 3 1
2. Calculations
Volume flow m3/hr 1820.00 1820.00 3000.00 2410.00 3000.00 2410.00
Line size mm 600 750 600 750 600 750
Pipe CS area m2 0.28278 0.44184375 0.28278 0.44184375 0.84834 0.44184375
Velocity m/s 1.79 1.14 2.95 1.52 0.98 1.52
3. Outputs
Velocity of Liquid m/s 1.7878 1.1442 2.9469 1.5151 0.9823 1.5151
Allowed velocity m/s 0.9144 1.5000 0.9144 1.5000 0.9144 1.5000
4. Result
Nozzle Size required Inch 24.00 30.00
No of Nozzle Required 3.00 1.00
It is seen from above table that tank inlet does not meet API 650 criteria of 3 ft/s. To limit turbulence and static
charge generation when roof is at standing position, either larger nozzle or more number of nozzles are
needed. Why outlet nozzle
allowed velocity
This criteria was not met in original design as well. API 650 clause leaves it to Purchaser
considered moreor floating
roof manufacturer.Criteria not being met is considered as this not being felt necessary at design stage.
API 650 also references API 2003 on Static Electricity. API 2003, clause 4.5.2.b states:
Inlet nozzle sizing change can be minimized by slower loading rate when floating roof is at standing position.
This is considered possible and confirmed as being practised during operation by Client during meeting.
Once roof is Buoyant, inlet velocity is not seen a concern as at filling rate considered, velocity is well below
7 m/s suggested by API 2003.
For outlet nozzles, velocity is slightly more than 1.5 m/s. This is checked for submergence calculation:
1) Self-venting_Flow
Inputs
Flowrate 2410 m3/hr
Pipe diameter 30 in
Calculations
Pipe diameter 0.76 m
Pipe area 0.46 m2
Velocity 1.47 m/s
Froude number 0.54
Line size self-venting NO
As seen from above, required submergence is ~150 m for side outlet. As per GAD, available submergence
for N13 nozzle (top of pipe at 1250 mm from bottom) is ~250 mm from LSLL (1400 mm) and meets the
submergence criteria. Thus, outlet nozzle size of 30" is considered adequate.
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 19
001A/B
OF 21
Three numbers of Rim seal vents are installed on 61-T-001 A/B of configuration seen below:
Rim seal vents are to release any vapor between liquid level and roof portions. Typical setting is 22 oz/in
i.e. 2.2 mbarg. Table below shows typical vent capacities from 6" Rim Seal vents.
Considering pressure setting of 2.2 mbarg, air venting rate from one no 6" rim seal vent is 421 Nm3/hr.
Considering this rate and installed 3 nos. of rim seal vents, tank can safely vnt ~1263 Nm3/hr air. Actual vent
from floating roof in buoyant position would be much lower than API 2000 calculation.
API 650 11th Edition Appendix-D clarifies that thermal breathing is not a criteria in sizing the vents of floating
roof tank.
Specify/use latest/ Rim space is 200 mm as per tank GAD. Rim area represents 2.1% of tank cross sectional area and can not
correct reference have entire liquid movement venting. For adequacy check, 10% of total outbreathing is considered
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 20
001A/B
OF 21
API 2000 is used for estimating total out-breathing rate considering entire tank height.
Method 1
which table?
Operating Temperature C
o
40.0 As per GAD
Operating Pressure barg 0.000 As per GAD
Vapour Pressure Hexane or similar Refer page 10 for discussion
Latitude of location Below 42° Refer page 10 for discussion
Thickness of insulation . m 0 Refer page 10 for discussion
Thermal conductivity of insulation W/mK 0.08 Typical value considered
Outbreathing due to evaporation/flashing kg/hr 0.0 Crude unlikely to flash
2) Calculations
2A)
Inbreathing due to liquid movement m3/h of Air 2410.0
Inbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2102.0
Outbreathing due to liquid movement m3/h of Air 3000.0
Outbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2616.6
Outbreathing including evaporation rate Nm3/h of Air 2616.6
Volume of Tank m3 16331.3
Y factor 0.3
Height of insulation No insulation
Rin 1.0
Rinp 1.0
Ri 1.0
Thermal Outbreathing Nm3/h of Air 1980.9
C factor 6.5
Thermal Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 5781.3
3) Outputs:
Inbreathing due to liquid movement Nm3/h of Air 2102.0
Thermal Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 5781.3
Total Inbreathing Nm3/h of Air 7883.3
Thus, due to small rim seal gap, rim seal vent capacity can be considered to be adequate.
Document No. PR-23019-CAL-002 Rev : B
PROCESS CALCULATION FOR 61-T-
Document: Page : 21
001A/B
OF 21
Roof stability check is part of Mechanical design and is not part of this project scope. Mechanical design as per
API 650 usually checks roof stability for Pontoon puncture and rainwater loads on roof only. Process
considerations that can lead to differemtial floating are not considered.
Check is part of
scope or not
For tank 61-T-001 A/B, following process situations warrant roof stability check:
1. Coil Rupture
Coil rupture would not have steam ensuing from all rim area uniformly. Thus, roof stability can be affected.
This shall be analysed as part of Mechanical design validation.
However, it is confirmed during meeting that Coil is not in operation during normal case. Thus, coil rupture
overpressure is considered a remote scenario.
2. Increased flowrate
Below is extract from DEP:
Liquid from inlet nozzle does not loose momentum immediately on entering tank. This momentum can cause
roof stability issues.
3. Jet Mixers
Jet mixers are present in storage tank and have led to sinking of roof due to mixing jets non-uniform flows and
directionality.
Jet mixers are present and installed by vendor. Impact on roof stability is presumed studied by jet mixer vendor