RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: TOOLS AND

TECHNIQUES

1
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Dr. Prabhat Pandey
Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey

© Bridge Center, 2015

BRIDGE CENTER
Buzau, Al. Marghiloman 245 bis, 120082
Tel. 0728394546
e-mail: editor@euacademic.org
Romania, European Union

Printed in Romania
First published, 2015

ISBN 978-606-93502-7-0

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be

reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without permission. Any person who does any unauthorised
act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal
prosecution and civil claims for damages.
The publishers have applied for copyright permission for
those pieces that need copyright clearance and due
acknowledgement will be made at the first opportunity.
The views and contents of this book are solely of the author.
The author of the book has taken all reasonable care to ensure
that the contents of the book do not violate any existing
copyright or other intellectual property rights of any person
in any manner whatsoever. In the event the author has been
unable to track any source and if any copyright has been
inadvertently infringed, please notify the publisher in writing
for corrective action.

2
Dr. Prabhat Pandey
Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey
 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

Bridge Center
2015
3
4
CONTENTS
Preface……………………………………………………………………
…………………………….6 Chapter 1 –
Research……………………………………………………………
……….7 Chapter 2 - Research
Process………………………………………………………………13
Chapter 3 - Research
Design……………………………………………………………….18
Chapter 4 - Research
Problem…………………………………………………………….23
Chapter 5 - Variables and Their
Types………………….……………………………..29 Chapter 6 -
Formulation of
Hypothesis……………………………………………….32 Chapter 7 –
Sampling…………………………………………………………………
……….40 Chapter 8 - Tools of Data
Collection……………………………………………………57 Chapter
9 - Data
Analysis…………………………………………………………………..
70 Chapter 10 - Interpretation of
Data…………………………………………………….75 Chapter 11 -
Research
Methods………………………………………………………….78
Chapter 12 - Descriptive or Survey
Method………………………………………..84 Chapter 13 -
Experimental
Method…………………………………………………….89 Chapter
14 - Research
Proposal………………………………………………………..101
Chapter 15 - Research
Report…………………………………….…………………..…110
Bibliography…………………………….………………………………
……………………….116
 5
PREFACE

The authors felt during their several years of teaching experience that
students fail to understand the books written on Research Methodology
because generally they are written in technical language. Since this
course is not taught before the Master’s degree, the students are not
familiar with its vocabulary, methodology and course contents.
The authors have made an attempt to write it in very non
technical language. It has been attempted that students who try to
understand the research methodology through self-learning may also
find it easy. The chapters are written with that approach. Even those
students who intend to attain high level of knowledge of the research
methodology in social sciences will find this book very helpful in
understanding the basic concepts before they read any book on
research methodology.
This book is useful those students who offer the Research
Methodology at Post Graduation and M.Phil. Level. This book is also
very useful for Ph.D. Course Work examinations.
 Dr. Prabhat Pandey Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey

1
Research
Introduction:

Research is an essential and powerful tool in leading man towards

progress. Without systematic research there would have been very little
progress.
John W. Best has rightly said, “The secret of our cultural
development has been research, pushing back the areas of ignorance by
discovering new truths, which, in turn, lead to better ways of doing
things and better products.”
Scientific research leads to progress in some field of life. New
products, new facts, new concepts and new ways of doing things are
being found due to ever-increasing significant research in the physical,
the biological, the social and the psychological fields. Research today is
no longer confined to the science laboratory.

Meaning of Research:
Word ‘Research’ is comprises of two words = Re+Search. It means to
search again. So research means a systematic investigation or activity to
gain new knowledge of the already existing facts.
Research is an intellectual activity. It is responsible for bringing
to light new knowledge. It is also responsible for correcting the present
mistakes, removing existing misconceptions and adding new learning to
the existing fund of knowledge. Researches are considered as a
combination of those activities which are removed from day to day life

7
and are pursued by those persons who are gifted in intellect and sincere
in pursuit of knowledge. But it is not correct to say that the research is
restricted to such type of persons, however, it is correct to say that
major contribution of research comes from highly gifted and committed
workers. Thus the research is not at all mysterious and is carried on by
hundreds of thousands of average individuals.
Research is also considered as the application of scientific
method in solving the problems. It is a systematic, formal and intensive
process of carrying on the scientific method of analysis. There are many
ways of obtaining knowledge. They are intuition, revelation, and
authority, logical manipulation of basic assumptions, informed guesses,
observation, and reasoning by analogy. One of the branches of research
known as empirical research is highly goal-oriented technique.

Definitions of Research:
The following are the important definitions of research: “Research is an
endeavor / attempt to discover, develop and verify knowledge. It is an
intellectual process that has developed over hundreds of years ever
changing in purpose and form and always researching to truth.”
J. Francis Rummel “Research is an honest, exhaustive, intelligent
searching for facts and their meanings or implications with reference to
a given problem. The product or findings of a given piece of research
should be an authentic,
verifiable contribution to knowledge in the field studied.” P.M. Cook
“Research may be defined as a method of studying problems whose
solutions are to be derived partly or wholly from facts.” W.S. Monroes
“Research is considered to be the more formal, systematic intensive
process of carrying on the scientific method of analysis. It involves a

8
more systematic structure of investigation, usually resulting in some
sort of formal record of procedures and a report of results or
conclusion.”
John W. Best
“Research comprises defining and redefining problems ,formulating
hypothesis or suggested solutions, collecting ,organizing and evaluating
data, making deductions and reaching conclusions and at last careful
testing the conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulated
hypothesis.”
Clifford Woody
“Research is a systematic effort to gain new knowledge.” Redman &
Mori
“Social research may be defined as a scientific undertaking which by
means of logical and systematized techniques aims to discover new
facts or verify and test old facts , analyse their sequences , inter
relationships and casual explanation which were derived within an
appropriate theoretical frame of reference , develop new scientific tools
, concepts and theories which would facilitate reliable and valid study of
human behavior.”
P.V. Younge

Purpose of Research:
The purpose of research is to discover answers to questions through the
application of scientific procedure. The main aim of research is to find
out the truth which is hidden and which has not been discovered as yet.
Though each research study has its own specific purpose, some general
objectives of research below:
(i) To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into
it. (Studies with this object in view are termed as exploratory or
formative research studies).

9
(ii) To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual,
situation or a group.(Studies with this object in view are known as
descriptive research studies).
(iii) To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with
which it is associated with something else. (Studies with this object
in view are known as diagnostic research studies).
(iv) To test a hypothesis of a causal relationship between variables.
(Such studies are known as hypothesis-testing research studies).

Characteristics of Research:
Following are the characteristics of research;
(i) Research is directed toward the solution of a problem. (ii)
Research requires expertise.
(iii) Research emphasizes the development of generalizations,
principles, or theories that will be helpful in predicting future
occurrences.
(iv) Research is based upon observable experience or empirical
 evidences.
(v) Research demands accurate observation and description. (vi)
Research involves gathering new data from primary or first-hand
sources or using existing data for a new purpose.
(vii) Research is characterized by carefully designed procedures that
apply rigorous analysis.
(viii) Research involves the quest for answers to un-solved problems. (ix)
Research strives to be objective and logical, applying every possible test
to validate the procedures employed the data collected and the
conclusions reached.
(x) Research is characterized by patient and unhurried activity.
(xi) Research is carefully recorded and collected.
(xii) Research sometimes requires courage.

10
Types of Research:
There are varieties of ways through which we may classify it into
different categories.
(A) On the basis of nature of information:
On the basis of nature of information we can classify the research into
two types;
(i) Qualitative Research: When information is in the form of qualitative
data.
(ii) Quantitative Research: When information is in the form of
quantitative data.
(B) On the basis of utility of content or nature of subject matter of
research:
On the basis of these criteria we can categorize the research into two
categories.
(i) Basic/ Fundamental /pure or Theoretical Research: Its utility is
 universal.
(ii) Experimental or Applied Research: Its utility is limited.
(C) On the basis of approach of research:
We may classify research into two different categories. (i) Longitudinal
Research: Examples of this category are historical, Case study and
Genetic research.
(ii) Cross-Sectional Research: Examples of this category are
Experimental and Survey Research.
(D) On the basis of method of research :
On the basis of research method we may classify a research into five
different categories.
(i) Philosophical Research: It is purely qualitative in nature and we are
focusing on the vision of others on the content of research. (ii) Historical
Research: It is both qualitative as well as quantitative in nature and
deals with past events.
11
(iii) Survey Research: It deals with present events and is quantitative in
nature. It may further be sub-divided into; discretional, correlational
and exploratory type of research.
(iv) Experimental Research: This is purely quantitative in nature and
deals with future events.
(v) Case-Study Research: It deals with unusual events. It may be
qualitative as well as quantitative in nature depending upon the
content.
 12

2 Research
Process

Research process consists of series of actions or steps necessary to

effectively carry out research. These actions or steps are; (i) Formulating
the Research Problem
(ii) Extensive Literature Survey
(iii) Developing the Research Hypothesis
(iv) Preparing the Research Design
(v) Determining the Research Design
(vi) Collecting the Research Data
(vii) Execution of the Project
(viii) Analysis of Data
(ix) Hypothesis Testing
(x) Generalization and Interpretation
(xi) Preparing of the Report or Presentation of the Result

(i) Formulation of Research Problem:

At the very outset, the researcher must decide the general area of
interest or aspect of a subject matter that he would like to inquire into
and then research problem should be formulated.

(ii) Extensive Literature Survey:

Once the problem is formulated the researcher should undertake
extensive literature survey connected with the problem. For this
purpose, the abstracting and indexing journals and published or

13
unpublished bibliographies are the first place to go to academic
journals, conference proceedings, government reports, books etc. must
be tapped depending on the nature of the problem.

(iii) Development of Working Hypothesis:

After extensive literature survey, researcher should state in clear terms
the working hypothesis or hypotheses. Working hypothesis is tentative
assumption made in order to draw out and test its logical or empirical
consequences. It’s very important or it provides the focal point for
research.

(iv) Preparing the Research Design:

After framing hypothesis we have to prepare a research design i.e. we
have to state the conceptual structure within which research would be
conducted. The preparation of such a design facilitates research to be as
efficient as possible yielding maximal information. In other words, the
function of research design is to provide for the collection of relevant
evidence with optimum effort, time and expenditure. But how all these
can be achieved depends mainly on the research purpose.

(v) Determining Sample Design:

A sample design is a definite plan determined before any data is actually
collected for obtaining a sample from a given population.in census
inquiry we involve a great deal of time, money and energy so it it not
possible in practice under many circumstances. Sample designs can be
either probability or non-probability. With probability samples each
element has a known probability of being included in the sample but
the non-probability samples do not allow the researchers to determine
this probability.

14
(vi) Collecting the Data:
There are several ways of collecting the appropriate data which differ
considerably in context of cost, time and other resources at the disposal
of the researcher. Primary data can be collected either through
experiment or through survey. In case of survey, data can be collected
by any one or more of the following ways;
By observation,
∙ Through personal interview,
∙ Through telephonic interviews,
∙ By mailing of questionnaires or
∙ Through schedules.

(vii) Execution of the Project:

Execution of project is a very important step in the research process. If
the execution of the project proceeds on correct lines, the data to be
collected would be adequate and dependable .A careful watch should
be kept for unanticipated factors in order to keep the survey realistic as
much as possible.

(viii) Analysis of Data:

The analysis of data requires a number of closely related operations
such as establishment of categories, the application of these categories
to raw data through coding, tabulation and then drawing statistical
inference. Analysis work after tabulation is generally based on the
computation of various percentages; coefficients etc., by applying
various well defined statistical formulae. In the process of analysis,
relationships of differences supporting or conflicting with original or
new hypothesis should be subjected to tests of significance to
determine with what validity data can be said to indicate any
conclusions.
15
(ix) Hypothesis Testing:
After analyzing the data, the researcher is in a position to test the
hypothesis, if any, he had formulated earlier. Do the facts support the
hypothesis or they happen to be contrary? This is the usual question
which is to be answered by applying various tests like ‘t’ test, ’F’ test etc.
F test have been developed by statisticians for the purpose
.Hypothesis testing will result in either accepting the hypothesis or in
rejecting it. If the researcher had no hypothesis to start with,
generalizations established on the basis of data may be stated.

(x) Generalizations and Interpretation:

If a hypothesis is tested and upheld several times, it may be possible for
the researcher to arrive at generalization i.e. to build a theory. As a
matter of fact, the real value of research lies in its ability to arrive at
certain generalizations. If the researcher had no hypothesis to start
with, he might seek to explain his findings on the basis of some theory.
It is known as interpretation.

(xi) Preparation of the Report or the Thesis:

Finally, the researcher has to prepare the report of what has been done
by him. The layout of the report should be as follows; the preliminary
pages, the main text and end matter. The preliminary pages carry title,
acknowledgements and forward and then index. The main text of the
report should have introduction, review of literature and methodology.

Criteria of Good Research:

One expects scientific research to satisfy the following criteria: (a) The
purpose of the research should be clearly defined and common
concepts be used.

16
(b) The research procedure used should be described in sufficient detail
to permit another researcher to repeat the researcher for further
advancement, keeping the continuity of what has already been
 attained.
(c) The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned to
yield results that are as objective as possible.
(d) The researcher should report with complete frankness, flaws in
procedural design and estimate their effects upon the findings. (e) The
analysis of data should be sufficiently adequate to reveal its significance
and the methods of analysis used should be appropriate. The validity
and reliability of the data should be checked carefully.
(f) Conclusions should be confined to those justified by the data of the
research and limited to those for which the data provide an
adequate basis.
(g) Greater confidence in research is warranted if the researcher is
experienced, has a good reputation in research and is a person of
integrity.

17

3 Research Design
A research design is simply the framework or plan for a study that is
used as a guide in collecting and analyzing the data. It is a blueprint that
is followed in completing a study. Research design is the blue print for
collection measurement and analysis of data. Actually it is a map that is
usually developed to guide the research.

Definitions:
“Research design is a master plan specifying the methods and
procedures for collection and analyzing the needed information.”
William Zikmund
“Research design is the plan, structure and strategy of investigation
conceived so as to obtain answers to research questions and to control
variance.”
Kerlinger Thus we can say that a research design is the arrangement of
condition for collection and analysis of data in a manner that aims to
generalize the findings of the sample on the population.

Purpose of a Research Design:

Research designs are used for the following purposes;
(i) To minimize the expenditure:
Research design carries an important influence on the reliability of the
results attained .It therefore provides a solid base for the whole
research. This makes the research as effective as possible by providing

18
maximum information with minimum spending of effort, money and
time by preparing the advance plan of all about the research.

(ii) To facilitate the smooth scaling:

Research design is needed because it facilitates the smooth scaling of
the various research operations, thereby making research as efficient as
possible yielding maximal information with minimal expenditure of
effort, time and money.

(iii) To collect the relevant data and technique:

Research design stands for advance planning of the methods to be
adopted for collecting the relevant data and the techniques to be used
in their analysis, keeping in view the objective of the research and the
availability of staff time and money. Poor preparation of research design
upset the entire project.

(iv) To provide blue print for plans:

Research design is needed due to the fact that it allows for the smooth
working of many research operations. It is like blue print which we need
in advance to plan the methods to be adopted for collecting the
relevant data and techniques to be used in its analysis for preparation of
research project. Just as for better economical and attractive
construction of a house need a blue print and a map of that, similarly
we needs a blue print or a design for the smooth flow of operation of
research.

(v) To provide an overview to other experts:

A research design provides an overview of all the research process and
with the help of the design we can take the help and views of experts

19
of that field .The design helps the investigator to organize his ideas ,
which helps to recognize and fix his faults.
(vi) To provide a direction:
A research design provides a proper or particular direction to the other
executives and others who are helping us into the process. The
researcher studies available, literature and learns about new
(alternative approaches.

Characteristics of Good Research Design:

Generally a good research design minimizes bias and maximizes the
reliability of the data collected and analyzed. The design which gives the
smallest experimental error is reported to be the best design in
scientific investigation. Similarly, a design which yields maximum
information and provides an opportunity for considering different
aspects of a problem is considered to be the most appropriate and
efficient design. A good research design possesses the following
characteristics;

(i) Objectivity:
It refers to the findings related to the method of data collection and
scoring of the responses. The research design should permit the
measuring instruments which are fairly objective in which every
observer or judge scoring the performance must precisely give the same
report. In other words, the objectivity of the procedure may be judged
by the degree of agreement between the final scores assigned to
different individuals by more than one independent observer. This
ensures the objectivity of the collected data which shall be capable of
analysis and interpretation.

20
(ii) Reliability:
It refers to consistency throughout a series of measurements. For
example, if a respondent gives out a response to a particular item, he is
expected to give the same response to that item even if he is asked
repeatedly. If he is changing his response to the same item, the
consistency will be lost. So the researcher should frame the items in a
questionnaire in such a way that it provides consistency or reliability.

(iii) Validity:
Any measuring device or instrument is said to be valid when it measures
what it is expected to measure. For example, an intelligence test
conducted for measuring the IQ should measure only the intelligence
and nothing else and the questionnaire shall be framed accordingly.

(iv) Generalizability:
It means how best the data collected from the samples can be utilized
for drawing certain generalizations applicable to a large group from
which sample is drawn. Thus a research design helps an investigator to
generalize his findings provided he has taken due care in defining the
population, selecting the sample, deriving appropriate statistical
analysis etc. while preparing the research design. Thus a good research
design is one which is methodologically prepared and should ensure
that generalization is possible. For ensuring the generalization we
should confirm that our research problem has the following
characteristics;
a) The problem is clearly formulated.
b) The population is clearly defined.
c) Most appropriate techniques of sample selection are used to
form an appropriate sample.
d) Appropriate statistical analysis has been carried out.21

e) The findings of the study are capable of generalizations.

(v) Adequate Information:
The most important requirement of good research design is that it
should provide adequate information so that the research problem can
be analyzed on a wide perspective. An ideal design should take into
account important factors like;
(i) Identifying the exact research problem to be studied
(ii) The objective of the research
(iii) The process of obtaining information
(iv) The availability of adequate and skilled manpower and (v) The
availability of adequate financial resources for carrying research.

(vi) Other Features:

Some other important features of a good research design are flexibility,
adaptability, efficiency, being economic and so on. A good research
design should minimize bias and maximize reliability and generalization.

22
 4 Research
Problem

The problems lie everywhere around us. They even lie at our door step
and in our backyards. Human nature is so complicated, that a problem
solved for one individual may still exist for another individual, a problem
solved for one class/ school/teacher/ situation/ system/time etc., still
remains a problem for another class/ school/ teacher/
situation/system/time or a problem solved for the time being may
reappear with a lapse of time. We become habitual of living in the age
of problems i.e. we are so much surrounded by the problem that we
suffers from ,”problem blindness”. But in order to solve the problem or
making research we need to delimit the problem.
Selection of problem is not the first step in research but
identification of the problem is the first step in research. Selection of
problem is governed by reflective thinking. It is wrong to think that
identification of a problem means to select a topic of a research or
statement of the problem.
A topic or statement of the problem and research problem are
not the synonyms but they are inclusive. The problem concerns with the
functioning of the broader area of field studied, whereas a topic or title
or statement of the problem is the verbal statement of the problem.
The topic is the definition of the problem which delimits or pin points
the task of a researcher.
It is the usual practice of the researcher that they select the
topic of the study from different sources especially from research
abstracts. They do not identify the problem, but a problem is made on
the basis of the topic. It results that they have no active involvement in
their research activities, whatever, they do, do mechanically.
 23
Definitions of the Problem:
The obstacles which hinder our path are regarded as problem. Different
definitions of the problem are given below;
“Problem is the obstacle in the path of satisfying our needs.” John
Geoffery
“Problem is a question which is to be solved.”
John. G. Tornsand
“To define a problem means to put a fence around it, to separate it by
careful distinctions from like questions found in related situations of
need.”
Whitney
“A problem is a question proposed for a solution generally speaking a
problem exists when there is a no available answer to same question.”
J.C. Townsend
“A problem is an interrogative sentence or statement that asks: What
relation exists between two or more variables?”
F.N. Kerlinger
“To define a problem means to specify it in detail and with precision
each question and subordinate question to be answered is to be
specified, the limits of the investigation must be determined.
Frequently, it is necessary to review previous studies in order to
determine just what is to be done. Sometimes it is necessary to
formulate the point of view or educational theory on which the
investigation is to be based. If certain assumptions are made, they must
be explicitly noted.”
Monero and Engelhart

Identification of a Research Problem:

The following steps are to be followed in identifying a research

pr

bl

;2

Step I Determining the field of research in which a researcher is keen to

do the research work.
Step II The researcher should develop the mastery on the area or it
should be the field of his specialization.
Step III He should review the research conducted in area to know the
recent trend and studies are being conducted in the area. Step IV On the
basis of review, he should consider the priority field of the study.
Step V He should draw an analogy and insight in identifying a problem
or employ his personal experience of the field in locating the
problem. He may take help of supervisor or expert of the field.
Step VI He should pin point specific aspect of the problem which is to be
investigated.

The Sources of the Problem:

(i) The classroom, school, home, community and other agencies of
education are obvious sources.
(ii) Social developments and technological changes are constantly
bringing forth new problems and opportunities for research. (iii) Record
 of previous research such specialized sources as the
encyclopedias of educational, research abstracts, research
bulletins, research reports, journals of researches, dissertations
and many similar publications are rich sources of research
problems.
(iv) Text book assignments, special assignments, reports and term
papers will suggest additional areas of needed research. (v)
Discussions-Classroom discussions, seminars and exchange of ideas
with faculty members and fellow scholars and students will suggest
many stimulating problems to be solved, close

25
professional relationships, academic discussions and constructive
academic climate are especially advantageous opportunities. (vi)
Questioning attitude: A questioning attitude towards prevailing
practices and research oriented academic experience will effectively
promote problem awareness.
(vii) The most practical source of problem is to consult supervisor,
experts of the field and most experienced persons of the field.
They may suggest most significant problems of the area. He can
discuss certain issues of the area to emerge a problem.

Although research problems should not be assigned or they should not

be proposed and allotted by a guide but consultation with the more
experienced faculty member or research worker is a desirable practice.
One of the most important functions of the research guide is to
help the student clarify his thinking, achieve a sense of focus and
develop a manageable problem from one that may be vague and too
complex.
Statement of Problem:
Kerlinger has identified following three criteria of good problem
statements;
1. A problem should be concerned with relation between two or more
variables.
2. It should be stated ‘clearly and unambiguously in question form’.
3. It should be amenable to empirical testing.

Meeting these criteria in his problem statement will result, in a clear

and concise idea of what the researcher wants to do. This sets the state
for further planning.

26
Objectives of Assumptions about the Problem:
1. To make the research work feasible.
2. To delimit the scope of the problem.
3. To establish the proper frame of reference.

Aspects of Delimiting a Problem:

1. Delimited to certain variables that should be mentioned clearly in
the problem.
2. Delimited to the area or level as primary level, secondary level,
college or university level.
3. Delimited to size of sample, considering the time, energy and
money.
4. Delimited to the best method only.
5. Delimited to the best available tool for measuring the variable.
 6. Delimited to the most appropriate techniques.
7. Other delimitations particular to a problem.
As the above delimitations help the researcher for conducting
the study, the findings of studies also confine to these delimitations.

Evaluation of the Problem:

When considering a problem a researcher is required to ask himself a
series of questions about it. These are helpful in the evaluation of the
problem on the basis of personal suitability of the researcher and social
value of the problem.
Following questions must be answered affirmatively before the
study is under Taken:
1. Is the Problem Researchable?
2. Is the Problem New?

27
3. Is the Problem Significant?
4. Is the Problem Feasible for the Particular Researcher?

In order to be feasible, a problem should agree with the

following: a) Research competencies of the Researcher
b) Interest and enthusiasm of the Researcher
c) Financial consideration in the Project
d) Time requirement for the Project
e) Administrative considerations in the Project.
 28

5
Variables and Their Types
Variable is a concept which can take on different quantitative values. For
example; height, weight, income, age etc. The main focus of the
scientific study is to analyse the functional relationship of the variables.
A variable is a quantity which can vary from one individual to another.
The quantity which can vary from person to person.
“Variable is a property that taken on different value”,
Kerlinger
It is any feature or aspect of an event, function or process that, by its
presence and nature, affects some other event or process, which is
being studied.
(i) Continuous Variable:
It is that which can assume any numerical value within a specific
range. (ii) Discrete Variable:
A variable for which the individual values fall on the scale only with
distinct gaps is called a discrete variable.
(iii) Dependent Variable or Criterion variable:
If one variable depends or is a consequence of other, it is termed as
dependent variable. Criterion variable is the basis on which the
effectiveness of the experimental variable is studied.
(iv) Independent Variable or Experimental Variable: The variable that is
antecedent to the dependent variable is termed as an independent
variable. The variable whose effect is going to be known is known as
experimental variable.

29
(v) Controlled Variable:
The effectiveness of an experimental variable is examined by comparing
with other variable, known as controlled variable.
(vi) Confounding Variable:
Those aspects of study or sample, that might influence the dependent
variable (outcome measures) ,and whose effect may be confused with
the effects of the independent variable. They are of two types;
Intervening and extraneous variable.
(vii) Intervening Variable:
There are a number of abstract variables in educational/social
experiments, which intervene the effect of experimental or criterion
variable. For controlling intervening variable appropriate research
design should be used. Intervening variables are hard if not impossible,
to observe because they usually have to do with an individual’s feelings
like boredom, stress, fatigue, excitement etc. Extraneous variable on the
other hand, are more readily observed or measured and thus are more
easily controlled.
(viii) Extraneous Variable:
Independent variables that are not related to the purpose of the study,
but may affect the dependent variable are termed as extraneous
variables. Suppose the researcher wants to test the hypothesis that
there is a relationship between children’s gain in social studies
achievement and their self-concept. Here self-concept is independent
variable and achievement in social study is dependent variable.
Intelligence may as well affect the social studies achievement; but since
it is not related to the purpose of the study undertaken by the
researcher, it will be termed as extraneous variable. Whatever effect is
noticed on dependent variable as a result of extraneous variable(s) is
technically described as an ‘experimental error.’
A study must always be so designed that the effect upon the dependent
variable is attributed entirely to the independent variables 30
and not to some extraneous variable(s).When the dependent variable is
not free from the influence of extraneous variable(s), the relationship
between the dependent and independent variable is said to be
confounded by an extraneous variable(s).
Extraneous variable can be controlled by removing the variable
causing distraction. It may be eliminated by selecting cases with uniform
characteristics and through randomization.
(ix) Organismic Variable:
There are some variables which cannot be manipulated. They are
accepted by the researcher as they are. They are levels of intelligence,
sex, class levels, and the like. The researcher can classify the subjects by
sex but he cannot modify to suit his research condition. If a researcher
attempts to compare boys and girls on some learning task, any
differences might be attributed to sex differences but not necessarily so.
The differences between boys and girls could be due to differences in
intelligence, training, motivation or a myriad of other conditions present
in all human beings and not necessarily to biological differences
between sex. Those variables which cannot be manipulated and cannot
themselves point out causal relations are called organismic variables.

31

6
Formulation of Hypothesis
Formulation of Hypothesis
The word hypothesis consists of two words –Hypo+Thesis. ‘Hypo’ means
tentative or subject to the verification. ‘Thesis’ means statement about
solution of the problem. Thus the literal meaning of the term hypothesis
is a tentative statement about the solution of the problem. Hypothesis
offers a solution of the problem that is to be verified empirically and
based on some rationale.
Again, ’hypo’ means the composition of two or more variables
which are to be verified and ‘thesis’ means position of these variables in
the specific frame of reference.

Definitions of Hypothesis:
“Any supposition which we make in order to endeavor to deduce
conclusions in accordance with facts which are known to be real under
the idea that if the conclusions to which the hypothesis leads are known
truths, the hypothesis itself either must be or at least likely to be true.”
J.S. Mill
“A hypothesis is a tentative generalization the validity of which remains
to be tested. In its most elementary stage the hypothesis may be any
hunch, guess, imaginative idea which becomes basis for further
investigation.”
Lundberg
“It is a shrewd guess or inference that is formulated and provisionally
adopted to explain observed facts or conditions and to guide in further
investigation.”
John W. Best 32

“A hypothesis is a statement temporarily accepted as true in the light of

what is, at the time, known about a phenomenon, and it is employed as
a basis for action in the search for new, truth, when the hypothesis is
fully established, it may take the form of facts, principles and theories.”
Barr and Scates
“Hypothesis is an assumption whose testability is to be tested on the
basis of the compatibility of its implications with empirical evidence and
previous knowledge.”
Gorge J. Mouly

Nature of Hypothesis:
(i) Conceptual: Some kind of conceptual elements in the framework are
involved in a hypothesis.
(ii) Verbal statement in a declarative form: It is a verbal expression of
ideas and concepts. It is not merely mental idea but in the verbal
form, the idea is ready enough for empirical verification.
(iii) It represents the tentative relationship between two or more
variables.
(iv) Forward or future oriented: A hypothesis is future-oriented. It
relates to the future verification not the past facts and
information.
(v) Pivot of a scientific research: All research activities are designed for
verification of hypothesis.

Functions of Hypothesis:
H.H. Mc Ashan has mentioned the following functions of hypothesis; (i)
It is a temporary solution of a problem concerning with some truth
which enables an investigator to start his research works.

33
(ii) It offers a basis in establishing the specifics what to study for and
may provide possible solutions to the problem.
(iii) It may lead to formulate another hypothesis.
(iv) A preliminary hypothesis may take the shape of final hypothesis. (v)
Each hypothesis provides the investigator with definite statement which
may be objectively tested and accepted or rejected and leads for
interpreting results and drawing conclusions that is related to original
purpose.
(vi) It delimits field of the investigation.
(vii) It sensitizes the researcher so that he should work selectively, and
have very realistic approach to the problem.
(viii) It offers the simple means for collecting evidences for verification.

Importance of a Hypothesis:
(i) Investigator’s eyes: Carter V. Good thinks that by guiding the
investigator in further investigation hypothesis serves as the
investigator’s eyes in seeking answers to tentatively adopted
generalization.
(ii) Focuses research: Without hypothesis, a research is unfocussed
research and remains like a random empirical wandering.
Hypothesis serves as necessary link between theory and the
investigation.
(iii) Clear and specific goals: A well thought out set of hypothesis places
clear and specific goals before the research worker and provides
him with a basis for selecting sample and research procedure to
meet these goals.
(iv) Links together: According to Barr and Scates, “It serves the
important function of linking together related facts and
information and organizing them into wholes.”

34
(v) Prevents blind research: In the words of P.V. Young, ”The use of
hypothesis prevents a blind search and indiscriminate gathering of
masses of data which may later prove irrelevant to the problem
 under study."
(vi) Guiding Light: ”A hypothesis serves as powerful beacon that lights
the way for the research work.”
(vii) It provides direction to research and prevent the review of
irrelevant literature and the collection of useful or excess data. (viii) It
sensitizes the investigator certain aspects of situation which are
irrelevant from the standpoint of problem at hand.
(ix) It enables the investigator to understand with greater clarity his
problem and its ramification.
(x) It is an indispensible research instrument, for it builds a bridge
between the problem and the location of empirical evidence that
may solve the problem.
(xi) It provides the investigator with the most efficient instrument for
exploring and explaining the unknown facts.
(xii) It provides a frame work for drawing conclusion.
(xiii) It stimulates the investigator for further research.

Forms of Hypothesis:
According to Bruce W. Tuckman following are the forms of hypothesis;
(i) Question form:
A hypothesis stated as a question represents the simplest level of
empirical observation. It fails to fit most definitions of hypothesis. It
frequently appears in the list. There are cases of simple investigation
which can be adequately implemented by raising a question, rather
than dichotomizing the hypothesis forms into acceptable / reject able
categories.

35
(ii) Declarative Statement :
A hypothesis developed as a declarative statement provides an
anticipated relationship or difference between variables. Such a
hypothesis developer has examined existing evidence which led him to
believe that a difference may be anticipated as additional evidence. It is
merely a declaration of the independent variables effect on the criterion
variable.
(iii) Directional Hypothesis :
A directional hypothesis connotes an expected direction in the
relationship or difference between variables. This type of hypothesis
developer appears more certain of anticipated evidence. If seeking a
tenable hypothesis is the general interest of the researcher, this
hypothesis is less safe than the others because it reveals two possible
conditions. First that the problem of seeking relationship between
variables is so obvious that additional evidence is scarcely needed.
Secondly, researcher has examined the variables very thoroughly and
the available evidence supports the statement of a particular
anticipated outcome.
(iv) Non –Directional Hypothesis or Null Hypothesis:
This hypothesis is stated in the null form which is an assertion that no
relationship or no difference exists between or among the variables.
Null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis testable within the framework
of probability theory. It is a non-directional form of hypothesis.
There is a trend to employ or develop null hypothesis in
research in most of the disciplines. A null hypothesis tentatively states
that on the basis of evidence tested there is no difference. If the null
hypothesis is rejected, there is a difference but we do not know the
alternative or the differences. In this the researcher has not to
anticipate or give the rational for the declaration or directional form. It
does not make researcher biased or prejudiced. He may be objective
about the expected outcomes of the research or findings.
 36
Actually this is a statistical hypothesis which is self- explanatory. Null
hypothesis means zero hypotheses. A researcher has not to do anything
in developing it. While research hypothesis is second step in the process
of reflective thinking.
A null hypothesis in an appropriate form is order to
accommodate the object of inquiry for extracting this information. It
does not necessarily reflect the expectations of the researcher so much
as the utility of the null form as the best fitted to the logic of chance in
statistical knowledge or science.
It is the no difference form, i.e. there is no difference or relationship
between or among variables under certain conditions. Statistical tests of
significance are used to accept and reject the null hypothesis. If it is
rejected, the general hypothesis is accepted. Non-directional hypothesis
is known as null hypothesis because it ‘nullifies’ the positive argument
of the findings or non-directional statement of the generalization. It is
also termed as statistical or zero hypothesis because it denies the
existence of any systematic principles apart from the effect of chance. It
assumes that none or zero difference exists between the two
population means or the treatments.

Formulation of Testable Hypothesis:

A hypothesis is a tentative assumption drawn from knowledge and
theory. It is used as a guide in the investigation of other facts and theory
that are as yet unknown. Its formulation is one of the most difficult and
most crucial step in the entire scientific process. A poorly chosen or
poorly worded hypothesis can prevent the following:
(i) The obtaining of enough pertinent data,
(ii) The drawing of conclusions and generalizations ,and (iii) The
 application of certain statistical measures in the analysis of the
result.

37
Hypothesis is the central core of study that directs the selection of the
data to be gathered, the experimental design, the statistical analysis
and the conclusions drawn from the study.
A study may be devoted to the testing of one major hypothesis,
a number of subsidiary hypothesis, or both major and subsidiary
hypotheses. When several hypotheses are used, each should be stated
separately in order to anticipate the type of analysis required and in
order to definitely accept or reject each hypothesis on its own merit.
Irrespective of number or type used each hypothesis should be testable
and based upon a logical foundation.

Fundamental Basis of Hypothesis:

The researcher deals with reality on two levels;
1. The Operational Level:
On the operational level researcher must define events in observable
terms in order to operate with the reality necessary to do researches. 2.
The Conceptual Level:
On the conceptual level the researcher must define events in terms of
underlying communality with other events. Defining at a conceptual
level, the researcher can abstract from single specific to general
instance and begin to understand how phenomena operate and
variables interrelate. The formulation of a hypothesis very frequently
requires going from an operational or concrete level to the conceptual
or abstract level. This movement to the conceptual level enables the
result to be generalized beyond the specific conditions of a particular
study and thus to be of wider applicability.
Research requires the ability to move from the operational to the
 conceptual level and vice–versa. This ability is required not only in
constructing experiments but in applying their findings as well. The

38
process of making conceptual contrasts between operational
programme is called conceptualization or dimensionalization.

Difficulties in the Formulation of Useful Hypothesis:

Moving from the operational to the conceptual level and vice –versa is a
critical ingredient of the research to demonstration process. The
following are the difficulties in the formulation of hypothesis:
1. Absence of knowledge of a clear theoretical framework. 2. Lack of
ability to make use of the theoretical framework logically. 3. Lack of
acquaintance with available research technique resulting in failure to
be able to phrase the hypothesis properly.
 39

7 Sampling

A survey may be conducted by either of two methods

1. Census Method or Parametric method and
2. Sampling method or Non-parametric method.

1. Census method:
It deals with the investigation of the entire population. Here the data
are collected for each and every unit of the universe. This method
provides more accurate and exact information as no unit is left out.

2. Sampling method:
Here a small group is selected as representative of the whole universe. It
works with the objective to obtain accurate and reliable information
about the universe with minimum of cost, time and energy and to set
out the limits of accuracy of such estimates. It makes exhaustive and
intensive study possible with much less time, money and material. Its
more popular in research work.

Population:
Population or universe means, the entire mass of observations, which is
the parent group from which a sample is to be formed. The term
population or universe conveys a different meaning than a traditional
one. In census survey, the count of individuals (men, women and
children) is known as population.

40
But in Research Methodology population means characteristics of a
specific group. For example secondary school teachers of, who have
some specific features like teaching experience, teaching attitudes etc.
Sampling means selecting a given number of subjects from a
defined population as representative of that population. One type of
population distinguished by educational researchers is called the target
population.
By target population distinguished by educational researchers is
called the target population.
By target population, also called universe, we mean all the
members of a real or hypothetical set of people , events or objects to
which we wish to generalize the results of our research.

The first step in sampling is to define the target population. Research

work is guided by inductive thinking. The researcher proceeds from
specificity to generality. The sample observation is the specific situation,
which is applied to the population, it is the general situation.
The measures of a sample are known as statistics and measures
of a population are termed as parameter. Mean, S.D., coefficient of
Correlation of sample observation known as Statistics and Mean, S.D.,
coefficient of correlation of population are known as parameters.
Generally parameters are estimated on the basis of sample statistics.
Sampling is indispensable technique in behavioral research and
not so common in physical sciences. It is fundamental to all statistical
methodology of behavioral and social research. It makes research
findings economical and accurate. Sampling means selection of
individuals from the population in such a way that every individual has
equal chance to be taken into the sample.
Term sample should be reserved for a set of units or portion of
an aggregate of material which has been selected in the belief that it

41
will be representative of the whole aggregate. By Frank Yates “Sample is
set of units of an aggregate.”

Assumptions of Sampling:
1. Homogeneity amidst complexity:
Social phenomenon is very complex in nature and every unit appears to
be different from another. But at the same time they also possess
similarities in many respects. It is, therefore, assumed that there is the
possibility of such representative types in the whole population that
makes sampling possible.

2. Possibility of Representative Selection:

Sampling has its origin in the mathematical theory of probability and
law of statistical regularity. The law of statistical regularity lays down
that a group of objects chosen at random from a large group tend to
possess the characteristics of that large group (universe) by
L. R. Conner.

3. Absolute accuracy not essential but relative or significant accuracy

i.e. needed in case of large scale observations. Because it is practically
impossible to achieve because of errors in measurement, collection of
data , its analysis, interpretation.

Definition:
“A statistical sample is a miniature picture or cross –section of the entire
group or aggregate from which the sample is taken.”
P. Y. Young

42
A sample is a small proportion of a population selected for observation
and analysis .It is a collection consisting of a part or sub-set of the
objects or individuals of population which is selected for the express
purpose of representing the population.
By observing the characteristics of the sample, one can make
certain inferences about characteristics of the population from which it
is drawn.
Sampling,”It is the process of selecting a sample from the
population. For this purpose, the population is divided into a number of
parts called sampling units.”
Sampling designs means the joint procedure of selection and
estimation. Sampling is a part of the strategy of research. Sampling
should be such that the error of estimation is minimum.
Good and Hatt, “A sample as the name implies, is a smaller
representation of a larger whole.”
W. G. Cocharn, “In every branch of science we lack the
resources, to study more than a fragment of the phenomenon that
might advance our knowledge.” i.e. fragment is sample and
phenomenon is population. The sample observations are applied to the
phenomenon i.e. generalization.
David S. Fox, “In the social sciences, it is not possible to collect
data from every respondent relevant to our study but only from some
fractional part of the respondents. The process of selecting the
fractional part is called sampling.”

Need of Sampling:
1. Economy of time.
2. Economy of money.
3. True detailed knowledge.
4. Utility in experimental study.
43
5. It has reliability because it is based on probability theory.

Advantages of Sampling:
1. It has a greater adaptability.
2. It is an economical technique.
3. It has high speed for generalization.
 4. According to W.G. Cocharan, “It has greater precision and
accuracy in the observation”.
5. This technique has great accuracy.
6. It has a greater speed in conducting a research work.
7. It has a greater scope in the field of research.
8. It reduces the cost of observation or data collection.

Disadvantages or Limitation of Sampling:

1. Scope of biasness.(Less accuracy)
2. Problem of representative sample-Difficulty in selecting a truly
representative sample.
3. Need of eligible researchers.
4. Instability of sample subjects or changeability of units i.e. in
heterogeneous population.
5. There are certain situations where sampling is possible.

Essentials of an Ideal Sample:

⮚ Homogeneity: The units included in sample must be as likeness with
other units.
⮚ Adequacy: A sample having 10% of the whole data is adequate. ⮚
Independence: Every unit should be free to be included in the sample.

44
⮚ Representativeness; An ideal sample must be such that it represents
the whole data adequately.

In the number of units included in a sample should be sufficient to

enable derivation of conclusions applicable to the whole data.
Economical in terms of time and money.
High level of reliability.

Characteristics of a Good Sample:

1. A good sample is the true representative of the population
corresponding to its properties.
2. The population is known as aggregate of certain properties and
sample is called sub-aggregate of the universe.
3. A good sample is free from bias; the sample does not permit
prejudices, the learning and pre-conception, imaginations of the
investigator to influence its choice.
4. A good sample is an objective one; it refers objectivity in selecting
procedure or absence of subjective elements from the situation. 5. A
good sample maintains accuracy .It yields an accurate estimates or
statistics and does not involve errors.
6. A good sample is comprehensive in nature. This feature of a closely
linked with true-representativeness. Comprehensiveness is a quality
of a sample which is controlled by specific purpose of the
investigation. A sample may be comprehensive in traits but may not
be a good representative of the population.
7. A good sample has the practicability for research.

45
Types of Sampling Designs/Methods of Sampling

Sampling

A Probability Sampling B Non-Probability Sampling A 1 Random

Sampling B-1 Incidental or Accidental Sampling A-2 Systematic Sampling B-2 Judgment
Sampling A-3 Stratified Sampling B- 3 Purposive Sampling A-4 Multistage Sampling B-4
Quota Sampling A-5 Purposive Sampling
A-6 Cluster Sampling
A-7 Multiple Sampling or Double Sampling

Difference between Probability and Non-Probability Sampling

Probability Sampling Non-probability Sampling

1. It is a method of sampling which In the absence of any idea of

gives the probability that a sample probability the method of
is sampling is known as
representative of population. non-probability sampling.

2. Probability sampling is generally It is generally used in action

used in fundamental research in researches in which one
which the purpose is to generalize studies a class without any
the results. generalization purpose.

3. It refers from the sample as well There is no idea of population.

as the population.

4. Every individual of the population There is no probability of

has equal probability to be taken selecting any individual.
into the sample.

5. It may be representative of the It has free distribution.

population.

6. Its observations (data) are used for The observations are not used
the inferential purpose. for generalization purpose.

7. Inferential or parametric statistics are Non-inferential or non-parametric

46
used. statistics are used.
8. There is a risk of drawing conclusion. There is no risk for drawing
conclusions.

9. It is based on Law of probability It is not based on law of

sampling i.e. Law of Statistical probability sampling.
Regularity and Law of Inertia of
the Large Sample.

Probability Sampling:

G.C. Halmstadter, “A probability sample is one that has been used

selected in such a way that every element chosen has a known
probability of being included.”

Probability sampling is of different types:

(1) Simple Random Sampling :
It is one in which each element of the population has an equal and
independent chance of being included in the sample i.e. a sample
selected by randomization method is known as simple random sample
and this technique is simple randomizing.
Randomization is done by using the following
techniques: (a) Tossing a coin (b) Throwing a dice
(b) Lottery method (d) Blind folded method
(c) Tippett’s table method
Merits of Randomization:
1. It requires the minimum knowledge of population.
2. It is free from subjectivity and free from personal error.
3. It provides appropriate data for one’s purpose.
4. The observations of the sample can be used for inferential
purpose.
 47
Demerits of Randomization:
1. It cannot ensure the representativeness of a sample. 2. It does
not use the knowledge about the population. 3. Its inferential
accuracy depends upon the size of the sample.

(2) Systematic Sampling:

Systematic sampling is an improvement over the simple random
sampling. This method requires the complete information about the
population. There should be a list of information of all the individuals of
the population in any systematic way.
Now we decide the size of the sample:
Let the size of sample is = n and population size is = N
Now we select each N/n individual from the list and thus we have the
desired size of sample which is known as systematic sample. Thus for
this technique of sampling population should be arranged in any
systematic way.
Merits:
1. This is a simple method of selecting a sample.
2. It reduces the field cost.
3. Inferential statistics may be used.
4. Sample may be comprehensive and representative of population.
5. Observations of the sample may be used for drawing conclusions
and generalizations.
Demerits:
1. This is not free from error, since there is subjectivity due to
different ways of systematic list by different individuals. 2.
Knowledge of population is essential.
 3. Information of each individual is essential..

48
4. This method can’t ensure the representativeness.
5. There is a risk in drawing conclusions from the observations of
the sample.

(3) Stratified Sampling:

It is an improvement over the earlier methods. When we employ this
technique, the researcher divides his population into strata on the basis
of some characteristics and from each of these smaller homogenous
groups (strata) draws at random a predetermined number of units.
Researcher should choose that characteristic as criterion which seems
to be more relevant in his research work.
Stratified sampling may be of three types;
(a) Disproportionate:
Means that the size of the sample in each unit is not proportionate to
the size of the unit but depends upon considerations involving personal
judgement and convenience. This method of sampling is more effective
for comparing strata which have different error possibilities. It is less
efficient for determining population characteristics.
(b) Proportionate:
It refers to the selection from each sampling unit of a sample that is
proportionate to the size of the unit. Advantages of this procedure
includes representativeness with respect to variables used as the basis
of classifying categories and increased chances of being able to make
comparisons between strata. Lack of information on proportion of the
population in each category and faulty classification may be listed as
disadvantages of this method.
(c) Optimum allocation:
Stratified sampling is representative as well as comprehensive than
other stratified samples. It refers to selecting units from each stratum.
Each stratum should be in proportion to the corresponding stratum the

49
population. Thus sample obtained is known as optimum allocation
sample.
Merits:
(i) It is a good representative of the population.
(ii) It is an improvement over the earlier technique of sampling.
(iii) It is an objective method of sampling.
(iv) Observations can be used for inferential purpose.
Demerits:
(i) Serious disadvantage of this method is that it is difficult for the
researcher to decide the relevant criterion for stratification. (ii) Only
one criterion can be used for stratification, but generally it
seems more than one criterion relevant for stratification.
(iii) It is costly and time consuming method.
(iv) Selected samples may be representative with reference to the
used criterion but not for the other.
(v) There is a risk of generalization.

(4) Multiple or Double Repetitive Sampling:

Generally this is not a new method but only a new application of the
samplings. This is most frequently used for establishing the reliability of
a sample. When employing a mailed questionnaire, double sampling is
sometimes used to obtain a more representative sample. This is done
because some randomly selected subjects who are sent questionnaires
may not return them.
Obviously, the missing data will bias the result of the study, if
the people who fail to reply the query differ in some fundamental way
from the others in respect to the phenomenon being studied.
To eliminate this bias, a selected sample may be drawn at
random from the non-respondents and the people interviewed to

50
obtain the desired information. Thus this technique is also known as
repeated or multiple sampling.
This double sampling technique enables one to check on the
reliability of the information obtained from first sample. Thus, double
sampling, where in one sample is analyzed and information obtained is
used to draw the next sample to examine the problem further.
Merits:
(i) Thus sampling procedure leads to the inferences of free
determine precision based on a number of observations. (ii) This
technique of sampling reduces the error.
(iii) This method maintains the procedure of the finding evaluate
the reliability of the sample.
Demerits:
(i) This technique of sampling cannot be used for a large sample . It
is applicable only for small sample.
(ii) This technique is time consuming and costly.
(iii) Its planning and administration is more complicated.

(5) Multi Stage Sampling:

This sample is more comprehensive and representative of the
population. In this type of sampling primary sample units are inclusive
groups and secondary units are sub-groups within these ultimate units
to be selected which belong to one and only one group.
Stages of a population are usually available within a group or
population, whenever stratification is done by the researcher. The
individuals are selected from different stages for constituting the multi
stage sampling.
Merits:
(i) It is a good representative of the population.

51
(ii) Multistage sampling is an improvement over the earlier
methods.
(iii) It is an objective procedure of sampling.
(iv) The observations from multi stage sample may be used for
inferential purpose.
Demerits:
(i) It is a difficult and complex method of sampling.
(ii) It involves errors when we consider the primary stages.
(iii) It is again a subjective technique of sampling.

(6) Cluster Sampling:

To select the intact group as a whole is known as a cluster sampling. In
cluster sampling the sample units contain groups of element (cluster)
instead of individual members or items in the population. Rather than
listing all elementary school children in a given city and randomly
selecting 15 % of these students for the sample, a researcher lists all of
the elementary schools in the city, selects at random 15 % of these
clusters of units, and uses all of the children in the selected schools as
the sample.
Merits:
(i) It may be a good representative of the population.
(ii) It is an easy method.
(iii) It is an economical method.
 (iv) It is practicable and highly applicable in education.
(v) Observations can be used for inferential purpose.
Demerits:
(i) Cluster sampling is not free from errors.
(ii) It is not comprehensive.

52
Non-Probability Sampling Method:
Samples which are selected through non-random methods are called
non probability samples. Depending upon the technique used it may be;

(1) Incidental or Accidental Sampling:

The term incidental or accidental applied to those samples that are
taken because they are most frequently available i.e. this refers to the
groups which are used as samples of a population because they are
readily available or because the researcher is unable to employ more
acceptable sampling methods.
Merits:
(i) It is very easy method of sampling.
(ii) It is frequently used method in behavioural sciences. (iii) It
reduces the time, money and energy i.e. it is an economical
method.
Demerits:
(i) It is not representative of the population.
(ii) It is not free from errors.
(iii) Parametric statistics cannot be used.

(2) Judgment Sampling:

This involves the selection of a group from the population on the basis
of available information assuming as if they are representative of the
entire population. Here group may also be selected on the basis of
intuition or on the basis of the criterion deemed to be self-evident.
Generally investigator should take the judgment sample so this
sampling is highly risky.

53
Merits:
(i) Knowledge of investigator can be best used in this technique of
sampling.
(ii) This method of sampling is economical.
Demerits:
(i) This technique is objective.
(ii) It is not free from errors.
(iii) It includes uncontrolled variation.
(iv) Inferential statistics cannot be used for the observation of this
sampling, so generalization is not possible.

(3) Purposive Sampling:

The purposive sampling is selected by some arbitrary method because it
is known to be representative of the total population, or it is known that
it will produce well matched groups. The idea is to pick out the sample
in relation to criterion which are considered important for the particular
study. This method is appropriate when the study places special
emphasis upon the control of certain specific variables.
Merits:
(i) Use the best available knowledge concerning the sample
subjects.
(ii) Better control of significant variables.
(iii) Sample groups data can be easily matched.
(iv) Homogeneity of subjects used in the sample.
Demerits:
 (i) Reliability of the criterion is questionable.
(ii) Knowledge of population is essential.
(iii) Errors in classifying sampling subjects.
(iv) Inability to utilize the inferential parametric statistics. (v)
Inability to make generalization concerning total population.

54
(4) Quota Sampling:
This combines both judgment sampling and probability sampling: on the
basis of judgment or assumption or the previous knowledge, the
proportion of population falling into each category is decided.
Thereafter a quota of cases to be drawn is fixed and the observer is
allowed to sample as he likes. Quota sampling is very arbitrary and likely
to figure in municipal surveys.
Merits:
(i) It is an improvement over the judgment sampling.
(ii) It is an easy sampling technique.
(iii) It is not frequently used in social surveys.
Demerits:
(i) It is not a representative sample.
(ii) It is not free from errors.
(iii) It has the influence of regional , geographical and social factors.

(5) Snowball Sampling:

The term; snow ball sampling’ has been used to describe a sampling
procedure in which the sample goes on becoming bigger and bigger as
the observation or study proceeds. The term snowball stems from the
analogy of a snowball sample which would allow computation of
estimates of sampling error and use of statistical test of significance.
 For example, an opinion survey is to be conducted on smokers
of a particular brand of cigarette. At the first stage, we may pick up a
few people who are known to us or can be identified to be the smokers
of that brand. At the time of interviewing them, we may obtain the
names of other persons known to the first stage subjects. Thus the
subjects go on serving an informant for the identification of more
subjects and the sample goes on increasing.

55
Merit:
Snowball sampling which is generally considered to be non
probabilistic can be converted into probabilistic by selecting subjects
randomly within each stage.

Demerits:
Sampling errors may creep in.

(6) Purposive or Expert Choice Sampling:

Samples are sometimes expressly chosen because, in the light of
available information, these mirror some larger group with reference to
one or more given characteristics. The controls in such samples are
usually identified as representative areas (city, country, state, district),
representative characteristics of individuals (age, sex, marital status,
socio-economic status, race) or types of groups (administrator,
counselors, teachers etc.).
These controls may be further sub-divided by specified
categories within classes such as amount of training, years of experience
or attitudes towards a specific phenomenon. Up-to this stage, these
controls are somewhat similar to those used in satisfaction. Purposive
sampling differs from stratified random sampling in that the actual
selection of the units to be included in the sample in each group is done
purposively rather than by random method.

56

8
Tools of Data Collection
A researcher requires many data – gathering tools or techniques. Tests
are the tools of measurement and it guides the researcher in data
collection and also in evaluation. Tools may vary in complexity,
interpretation, design and administration. Each tool is suitable for the
collection of certain type of information.
One has to select from the available tools those which will
provide data he seeks for testing hypothesis. It may happen that existing
research tools do not suit the purpose in some situation, so researcher
should modify them or construct his own.
Different tools used for data collection may be;
1. Questionnaires
2. Interviews
3. Schedules
4. Observation Techniques
5. Rating Scales
1. Questionnaire:
It is list of questions related to one topic. It may be defined as;

“A questionnaire is a systematic compilation of questions that are

submitted to a sampling of population from which information is
desired.”
Barr, Davis & Johnson

57
“In general, the word questionnaire refers to a device for securing
answers to questions by using a form which the respondent fills in
himself.”
W. J. Goode & K. Hall

The questionnaire is probably most used and most abused of the data
gathering devices .It is easy to prepare and to administer. The
questionnaire is a form prepared and distributed to secure responses to
certain questions. It is a device for securing answers to questions by
using a form which the respondent will fill by himself. It is a systematic
compilation of questions. It is an important instrument being used to
gather information from widely scattered sources. Normally used where
one cannot see personally all of the people from whom he desires
responses or where there is no particular reason to see them personally.

Characteristics of a Good Questionnaire:

1. It deals with an important or significant topic.
2. Its significance is carefully stated on the questionnaire itself or on its
covering letter.
3. It seeks only that data which cannot be obtained from the resources
like books, reports and records.
4. It is as short as possible, only long enough to get the essential data. 5.
It is attractive in appearance, nearly arranged and clearly duplicated or
printed.
6. Directions are clear and complete, important terms are clarified. 7.
The questions are objective, with no clues, hints or suggestions. 8.
Questions are presented in a order from simple to complex. 9. Double
negatives, adverbs and descriptive adjectives are avoided. 10. Double
barreled questions or putting two questions in one question are also
avoided.
58
11. The questions carry adequate number of alternatives.
12. It is easy to tabulate, summarize and interpret.
Merits of Questionnaire Method:
1. it’s very economical.
2. It’s a time saving process.
3. It covers the research in wide area.
4. It’s very suitable for special type of responses.
5. It is most reliable in special cases.
Demerits of Questionnaire Method:
1. Through this we get only limited responses.
2. Lack of personal contact.
3. Greater possibility of wrong answers.
4. Chances of receiving incomplete response are more.
5. Sometimes answers may be illegible.
6. It may be useless in many problems.

The Interview:
Interview is a two way method which permits an exchange of ideas and
information.

“Interviewing is fundamentally a process of social interaction.” W. J.

Goode & P.K. Hatt
“The interview constitutes a social situation between two persons, the
psychological process involved requiring both individuals mutually
respond though the social research purpose of the interview call for a
varied response from the two parties concerned.”
Vivien Palmar

59
“The interview may be regarded as a systematic method by which a
person enters more or less imaginatively into the inner life of a
comparative stranger.”
P.V. Young

In an interview a rapport is established between the interviewer and the

interviewee. Not only is physical distance between them annihilated,
the social and cultural barrier is also removed; and a free mutual flow of
ideas to and fro takes place. Both create their respective impression
upon each other.
The interview brings them both on the same level and an
emotional attachment supervenes between them.
In an interview all formalities are laid down and the gate is
opened for delivering into the intellectuals, emotional and subconscious
stirrings of the interviewee. Thus here the ‘depth’ of subject (man) is
gone to the very bottom of his emotional pool and may check his
truthfulness of responses.
 Difference between Interview and Questionnaire
Questionnaire Method Interview Method

1. Data is gathered indirectly. 1. Data is gathered directly.

2. No face to face contact between 2. There is face to face contact
two. 3. Interviewer should have the between interviewer and interviewee.
general knowledge of the topic. 3. Skillful interviewer is needed.
4. Interviwee will hesitate to write 4. Some confidential information
it. 5. We get written information can also be obtained.
only. 5. We get written and oral both type
of information.

Characteristics of an Interview:
1. The interviewer can probe into casual factors, determine attitudes,
discover the origin of problem.

60
2. Its appropriate to deal with young children and illiterates person.
3. It can make cross questioning possible.
4. It helps the investigator to gain an impression of the person
concerned.
5. It can deal with delicate, confidential and even intimate topics.
6. It has flexibility.
7. Sincerity, frankness, truthfulness and insight of the interviewee can
be better judged through cross questioning.
8. It gives no chance for respondent to modify his earlier answer. 9. It is
applicable in survey method, but it is also applicable in historical,
experimental, case studies and clinical studies. Merits of Interview:
1. Direct research.
2. Deep research
3. Knowledge of past and future.
 4. Knowledge of special features.
5. Mutual encouragement is ossible.
6. Supra-observation is possible.
7. Knowledge of historical and emotional causes.
8. Examination of known data.
Disadvantage of Interview:
1. May provides misleading information.
2. Defects due to interviewee(low level of intelligence or may be
emotionally unbalanced)
3. Result may be affected due to prejudices of interviewer. 4. Result
may be affected due to the difference in the mental outlook of
interwee and interviewer.
5. One sided and incomplete research.

61
6. Art rather than science.
Schedule:
When a researcher is using a set of questionnaires for interview purpose
it is known as schedule.

“Schedule is the name usually applied to set of questions, which are

asked and filled by an interviewer in a face to face situation with
another.”
W.J. Goode & P. K. Hatt
By a schedule we cannot, however, obtain information about many
things at once. It is best suited to the study of a single item thoroughly.
According to Thomas Carson Macormie, “The schedule is nothing more
than a list of questions which, it seems necessary to test the
hypothesis.”
 Thus schedule is a list of questions formulated and presented with the
specific purpose of testing an assumption or hypothesis. In schedule
method interview occupies a central and plays a vital role.
As a matter of fact success in the use of schedule is largely
determined by the ability and tact of the interviewer rather than by the
quality of the questions posed.
Because the interviewer himself poses the questions and notes
down the answers all by himself, the quality of questions has not any
great significance.

Important Features of Schedule:

1. The schedule is presented by the interviewer. The questions are
asked and the answers are noted down by him.
2. The list of questions is a mere formal document, it need not be
attractive.
3. The schedule can be used in a very narrow sphere of social
re
se
ar
ch
.6
2
4. It aids to delimit the scope of the study and to concentrate on the
circumscribed elements essential to the analysis.
5. It aims at delimiting the subject.
6. In the schedule the list of questions is preplanned and noted down
formally and the interviewer is always armed with the formal
document detailing the questions.
Thus interviewer not to depend upon the memory.
Points to be kept in mind while designing schedule;
1. Interviewer should not frame long, complex, defective questions. 2.
Unrelated and unnecessary questions should not be asked. 3. Schedule
should not contain personal and upsetting questions. 4. Its questions
should be simple, clear and relevant to topic. 5. Questions be suitable to
respondent’s intelligence level. 6. Impersonal, indirect and unambiguous
questions should be included in schedule.
Merits of Schedule:
1. Higher percentage of responses.
2. Possible to observe personality factors.
3. Through interview personal contact is possible.
4. It is possible to give human touch to schedule.
5. Removal of doubts is possible because face to face interaction is
there.
6. It is possible to know about the defects of the interviewee.

Observation Technique:
This is most commonly used technique of evaluation research. It is used
for evaluating cognitive and non-cognitive aspects of a person. It is used
in evaluation performance, interests, attitudes, values towards their life
problems and situations. It is most useful technique for evaluating the
behaviors of children.

63
It is technique of evaluation in which behavior are observed in a natural
situations.
“It is thorough study based on visual observation. Under this
technique group behaviours and social institutions problems are
evaluated.”
C. Y. Younge
“Observation employs relatively more visual and senses than
audio and vocal organs.”
 C.A. Mourse The cause- effect relationship and study of
events in original form, is known as observation.
Observation seeks to ascertain what people think and do by
watching them in action as they express themselves in various situations
and activities.
Observation is recognized as the most direct means of studying
people when one is interested in their overt behavior.
In questionnaires and interview people may write answer as
they think, they do but this is often different from what they actually
do. These restrictions are missing in observation so observation is a
more natural way of gathering data. Artificiality and formality of
questionnaires and interview is replaced by reality and informality in
observation. Data obtained through observation are more real and true
than the data collected by any other method. It also plays a particular
part in survey procedure.

Characteristics of Observation Schedule:

According to Jahoda it has many characteristics;
1. It serves a formulated research purpose.
2. It is planned systematically rather than occurring haphazardly.64

3. It is systematically recorded and related to more general

propositions.
4. It is subjected to checks and controls with respect to validity ,
reliability and precision.
5. It is a direct technique to study an object, an event or a problem.
6. It is based mainly on visual –audio scene.
7. It employs own experiences.
8. It establishes cause-effect relationship.
9. It is an objective technique of data collection.
 10. It is both objective and subjective evaluation technique.
11. It is formal as well as informal technique.
12. It is quantitative as well as qualitative technique for data
collection.
Advantages:
1. It is reliable and valid technique of collecting data and
information.
2. We get first hand data through this method.
3. Record of observation is also available immediately.
4. It is simple, broad and comprehensive method.
5. It is an oldest technique of data collection and getting direct
information.
Limitations:
1. It has a limited scope for its use because all the events cannot be
observed directly.
2. It is subjective method.
3. It is very time consuming process.
4. Costly so energy consuming also.

65
5. Presence of observer influences the behavior of the person i.e.
subject becomes conscious.
6. In case covert behavior, which can’t be observed, it is not useful.
7. Observer should be trained and experienced.
Rating Scale:
Ratting is term applied to express opinion or judgment
regarding some situation, object or character. Opinions are usually
expressed on a scale of values; rating techniques are devices by which
such judgments may be quantified.
 “Rating is an essence and direct observation.”
Ruth Strong
“A rating scale ascertains the degree, intensity and frequency of
a variable.”
Von Dallen
Rating techniques are more commonly used in scaling traits and
attributes.
A rating method is a method by which one systematizes, the
expression of opinion concerning a trait.
The rating is done by parents, teachers, a board of interviewers
and judges and even by the self as well.
The special feature of rating scale is that the attitudes are evaluated not
on the basis of the opinions of the subjects but on the basis of the
opinions and judgments of the experimenter himself.
In rating scale data are collected by; Verbal behavior, facial
expression, personal documents, clinical type interview, projective
techniques and immediate experiences as emotions, thoughts and
perceptions.
Advantages:
1. Writing reports to parents.
66
2. Filling out admission blanks for colleges.
3. Finding out students’ needs.
4. Making recommendations to employers.
5. Supplementing other sources of under taking about child.
6. Stimulating effect upon the rates.
Limitations:
1. Difference in rating abilities.
2. Difference in reliability as subjects for rating.
 3. Agreement among raters of one type of contact only.
4. Average superior than single.
5. Impact of emotions.
6. Limits of self-rating.
7. Over rating.
8. Limits of rating of specific qualities.
9. Limits of justifications.
Activities Involved in Data Collection:
Data must be collected and recorded in a form suitable for the
intended analysis. The collection of data requires time and substantial
effort for acquiring skills and making the necessary arrangements for
collection and to ensure adequate quality.
Access to Data:
Generally it is a problem for researcher to get access to data
because the institutions or the persons who generally control the data
are not willing to provide him data for one or the other reason or
excuse. Some necessary steps are required to motivate such institutions
or persons to provide necessary data willingly. Some educational
problems are of such nature that the subjects specially girls are not
willing to disclose correct information. Similarly a researcher of any
board or university may not have access to confidential data.
67
Adequate Standard:
The researcher should demonstrate that his data were properly
collected. It is possible if the following conditions are fulfilled. (i) It
should be ensured that the supplied data met e requirement of
validity. In other words the data should, ensure what they claimed
to measure.
(ii) Proper attention should be paid to measurement error. The
following types of error are possible in data collection; (a) Errors due to
malfunctioning of measuring equipment/ instrument.
(b) Error of bias.
(c) Deliberate falsehood.
(d) Distortion of facts.
(e) Random errors.
(iii) It should be ensured that a suitable sample was drawn out of the
population so that proper generalization could be made. (iv) It should
also be checked that the data were properly recorded. The conditions
under which the data were gathered should be properly noted and
suitable data recording method should be used. The efforts should be
made to detect and eliminate errors arising during recording. The data
are generally recorded in the following forms; (a) notes of the
researcher
(b) Log books and journals are used by a researcher doing the
experiment or conducting a field study
(c) Interview notes
(d) Responses to questionnaires
(e) Recording on tape recorder.
(f) Video cameras
(g) Transcribing data for computer input

68
Data Organization:
Whatever method is used for collection of data it will be necessary that
an extensive set of supplementary notes should be made for the
following;
(a) Sources of data
(b) Conditions under which data were gathered.
There should be stored in such a way as offer some reasonable
prospects of retrieval when required.
Collecting Primary Data and Secondary Data:
The primary data can be collected through laboratory measurement,
field observation, questionnaires, interviews, opinionnaires, schedules
etc.
The secondary data can be collected from technical publications
such as manuals, handbooks, data sheets, and standards, books and
journals, official publications of the Central government, state
governments, local bodies, private data services and computer data
base.
General Rules:
There are some general rules that apply to all types of data collection.
They are as follows;
(i) Do not collect more information than is required for the research
problem.
(ii) Make sure the wording of the data collection instrument is clear and
unambiguous.
(iii) Use clear and explicit instructions in data collection instruments. (iv)
Design the response options as carefully as the items stems themselves.
(v) Make responding to the measuring instrument as alternative as
possible.
(vi) Make sure that the final products look professional.

69

9 Data Analysis

Data analysis embraces a whole range of activities of both the

qualitative and quantitative type. It is usual tendency in behavioral
research that much use of quantative analysis is made and statistical
methods and techniques are employed. The statistical methods and
techniques are employed. The statistical methods and techniques have
got a special position in research because they provide answers to the
problems.
Kaul defines data analysis as, ”Studying the organized material
in order to discover inherent facts. The data are studied from as many
angles as possible to explore the new facts.”

Purpose:
The following are the main purposes of data analysis:

(i) Description:
It involves a set of activities that are as essential first step in the
development of most fields. A researcher must be able to identify a
topic about which much was not known; he must be able to convince
others about its importance and must be able to collect data.

(ii) Construction of Measurement Scale:

The researcher should construct a measurement scale. All numbers
generated by measuring instruments can be placed into one of four
categories:

70
(a) Nominal: The number serves as nothing more than labels. For
example no 1 was not less than no 2 .Similarly no 2 was neither
more than no 1 and nor less than no 3.
(b) Ordinal: Such numbers are used to designate an ordering along
some dimensions such as from less to more, from small to large,
from sooner to later.
(c) Interval: The interval provides more précised information than
ordinal one. By this type of measurement the researcher can make
 exact and meaningful decisions. For example if A,B and C are of 150
cm, 145cm and 140 cm height, the researcher can say that A is 5 cm
taller than B and B is 5 cm taller than C.
(d) Ratio Scale: It has two unique characteristics. The intervals between
points can be demonstrated to be precisely the same and the scale
has a conceptually meaningful zero point.

(iii) Generating empirical relationships:

Another purpose of analysis of data is identification of regularities and
relationships among data. The researcher has no clear idea about the
relationship which will be found from the collected data. If the data
were available in details it will be easier to determine the relationship.
The researcher can develop theories if he is able to recognize pattern
and order of data. The pattern may be showing association among
variables, which may be done by calculating correlation among variables
or showing order, precedence or priority. The derivation of empirical
laws may be made in the form of simple equations relating one interval
or ratio scaled variable to a few others through graph methods.

(iv) Explanation and prediction:

Generally knowledge and research are equated with the identification
of causal relationships and all research activities are directed to it. But in
many fields the research has not been developed to the level where 71
causal explanation is possible or valid predictions can be made. In such a
situation explanation and prediction is construct as enabling the values
of one set of variables to be derived given the values of another.
Functions:
The following are the main functions of data analysis:
(i) The researcher should analyze the available data for examining
the statement of the problem.
 (ii) The researcher should analyze the available data for examining
each hypothesis of the problem.
(iii) The researcher should study the original records of the data
before data analysis.
(iv) The researcher should analyze the data for thinking about the
research problem in lay man’s term.
(v) The researcher should analyze the data by attacking it through
statistical calculations.
(vi) The researcher should think in terms of significant tables that
the available data permits for the analysis of data.

Statistical Calculations:
The researcher will have to use either descriptive statistics or inferential
statistics for the purpose of the analysis.

(i) The descriptive statistics may be on any of the following

forms: (a) Measures of Central Tendency:
These measures are mean, median, mode geometric mean and
harmonic mean. In behavioral statistics the last two measures are not
used. Which of the first three will be used in social statistics depends
upon the nature of the problem.

72
(b) Measures of Variability:
These measures are range, mean deviation, quartile deviation and
standard deviation. In social statistics the first two measures are rarely
used. The use of standard deviation is very frequently made for the
purpose of analysis.
(c) Measures of Relative Position:
These measures are standard scores (Z or T scores), percentiles and
percentile ranks .All of them are used in educational statistics for data
analysis.

(d) Measures of Relationship:

There measures are Co-efficient of Correlation, partial correlation and
multiple correlations. All of them are used in educational statistics for
the analysis of data. However the use of rank method is made more in
comparison to Karl pearson method.

(ii)The inferential statistics may be in any one of the following

forms: (a) Significance of Difference between Means:
It is used to determine whether a true difference exists between
population means of two samples.

(b) Analysis of Variance:

The Z or t tests are used to determine whether there was any significant
difference between the means of two random samples. The F test
enables the researcher to determine whether the sample means differ
from one another to a greater extent then the test scores differ from
their own sample means using the F ratio.

73
(c) Analysis of Co-Variance:
It is an extension of analysis of variance to test the significance of
difference between means of final experimental data by taking into
account the Correlation between the dependent variable and one or
more Co-variates or control variables and by adjusting initial mean
differences in the group.

(d) Correlation Methods:

Either of two methods of correlation can be used for the purpose of
calculating the significance of the difference between Co-efficient of
Correlation.

(e) Chi Square Test:

It is used to estimate the like hood that some factor other than chance
accounts to the observed relationship. In this test the expected
frequency and observed frequency are used for evaluating Chi Square.

(f) Regression Analysis:

For calculating the probability of occurrence of any phenomenon or for
predicting the phenomenon or relationship between different variables
regression analysis is cone.

74

10 0 Interpretation of
Data
According to F.L. Whitney, interpretation means an adequate exposition
of the true meaning of the material presented in terms of the purposes
of the study being reported and of the chapter and section topic
involved.

Purposes:
The following are the main purposes of interpretation of data or results;
(i) To throw light on the real significance of the material in the
context.
(ii) To understand implications of the data.
(iii) To provide hints of conclusions and recommendations of the
researcher.
(iv) To show the values of greatest worth that has resulted from the
research.
(v) To refer important generalization.

Factors:
The researcher should keep the following factors in consideration in
interpretation of data;

(i) Not to ignore those factors which are unstudied:

In social / behavioral researches there are many factors which have
their impact upon the findings of the research but no researcher is in
the position to study all the factors. Naturally he does not take into
account in interpretation of the results those factors which have not 75
been studied. It has its effect upon the search of truth. Thus the
researcher should take into consideration such factors in his
interpretation. For example if a comparison has been made between
the traditional method of teaching and any modern method of teaching
in respect of effectiveness of teaching, the interpretation that successful
attainment is the result of method of teaching only is complete denial of
the role of general mental ability, high achievement motivation and
better study habits etc.

(ii) Not to ignore those factors which have not been selected for study:
In social / behavioral researches, the subjects are generally so large that
the researcher collects the data from a selected group only. The
researcher should remember that some factors which have not been
included in selective group are equally important in their impact upon
findings. For example if the researcher collects data from a particular
school in a particular area and then he concludes about all the
schools/colleges.

(iii) Not to over –interpret the expected results:

The researcher should remember that even if he finds the findings of
the research as per his expectations he should not interpret more than
what can be interpreted on the basis of data available. The researcher
should be cautious that he reports all such factors which might be
responsible for the findings.

(iv) Not to exercise defense mechanism in interpreting the results: The

researcher should remember that it is not necessary that the
hypotheses should always be confirmed. It is possible that the
researcher may exercise defense mechanism if the results of the study
are not found as per expectations of the research. In such a situation he
should not try to find faults in tools or samples for the results against his
76
expectations. If any researcher tries to do so, his interpretation will not
be considered fair. The hypotheses are made in the beginning of the
research when the knowledge of the researcher about the problem is
very limited. Agreement between the tentative and the results is not
necessary.

77
11
Research
0 Methods
Historical Research Method:

History is the record of the changing processes. History consists of

changes which social structures undergo. Social scientists studies the
past to gain a better understanding of the present state of affairs.
History is the meaningful record of man’s achievement. It is not merely
a list of characteristics of chronological events, but an integrated
account of the relationship between persons, events, times and places.
John W. Best, “Man uses history to understand the past, and try
to understand the present in the light of past events and
developments.”
F.N. Kerlinger, “Historical research is the application of the
scientific method of inquiry to historical problems.”
Whitney, “Historical research deals with the past
experiences….its aim is to apply the method of reflective thinking of
social problems , still unsolved , by means of discovery of past trends of
event, fact and attitude. It traces the lines of development in human
thought and action in order to reach some basis for social activity.”
Redcliff Browne, “Historical method may be defined as a
system in which present day events are studied with reference to the
events that took place in the past.”
Historical method seeks to find explanation of questions of
current interest by an intensive study of the past. Many studies in the
field of economics, politics, sociology, education and psychology are
essentially historical in approach.

78
Purpose of Historical Research:
(i) Historical researches provide important information concerning
the effects of certain past practices and may suggest plans for
future actions.
(ii) It also offers explanation of the how and why of many of the
theories and practices that has developed and now prevails in
the school/college.
(iii) It contributes to an understanding of the significance of the
phenomenon studied.
(iv) It helps to gain an accurate account of the past.
(v) It helps to gain a clear perspective of the present.

Sources of Historical Research:

There are many sources for collection of historical data like;
Autobiographies, Diaries, Confessions, Memories, Personal letters,
Accessible documents, news-papers and literature, books and
Magazines, Cultural and Analytical history material, Artistic materials,
historical paintings, Portraits , charts etc.
These sources can be divided into two categories i.e. Primary
sources and Secondary sources.

Primary sources:
The original documents are termed as Primary sources. These are solid
basis of historical research and are highly prized by a historian.
According to Kerlinger, “A primary source is the only repository of an
historical datum, like an original record kept of an important occasion,
an eye witness description of an event, a photograph, minutes of
organization meeting and so on.”

79
(i) Document or records:
These are maintained and written by actual participant or witness of an
event. These sources are produced for the purpose of transmitting
information to be used in the future. Documents classified as primary
sources are constitution, charters, laws, court decisions, diaries, deeds,
genealogies, contracts, wills, autobiographies, letters, official minutes or
records, permits, licenses, affidavits, depositions, declarations,
proclamations certificates, lists, bills, handbills, receipts,
newspapers,magazines,accounts,maps,diagrams,books,pamphlets,catal
ogues,films,pictures,paintings,recordings,transcriptions and research
reports.

(ii) Remains or Relics:

These are associated with a person, group, period, fossils, skeletons,
tools, weapons, food utensils, clothing, buildings, furniture, coins, art
objects, pictures and paintings are examples of relics.

(iii) Oral Testimony:

These are spoken account of witness or participant in an event. It is
obtained in a personal interview. It may be recorded or transcript as the
witness relates his experiences.

Secondary Sources of Data:

In the words of Kerlinger, “A secondary source is an account or record
of an historical event or circumstance one or more steps removed from
an original history.”
Secondary sources are the reports of a person who relates the
testimony of actual witness of, or participant in an event. The writer of
the secondary source who was not on the scene of the event, merely

80