0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views16 pages

CAC Final Meeting Minutes 2024 03 01

The minutes summarize a meeting of the California Arts Council that took place on March 1, 2024 in Oakland and virtually. The meeting included presentations from local arts organizations, general public comments, and a discussion and vote on council meeting minutes from previous meetings.

Uploaded by

patriciastipek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views16 pages

CAC Final Meeting Minutes 2024 03 01

The minutes summarize a meeting of the California Arts Council that took place on March 1, 2024 in Oakland and virtually. The meeting included presentations from local arts organizations, general public comments, and a discussion and vote on council meeting minutes from previous meetings.

Uploaded by

patriciastipek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

MINUTES OF PUBLIC MEETING

Friday, March 1, 2024


10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

On Location/Virtual Hybrid Meeting

The Center for Healthy Communities


Eastmont Room
2000 Franklin Street
Oakland, CA 94612

The members of the California Arts Council convened in Oakland and via web
conference to discuss and vote on various items as listed in the minutes below. The full
audio and video of the meeting can be accessed here.

Council Members Present In-Person:


Leah Goodwin, Acting Chair
Gerald Clarke
Vicki Estrada
Nicola Miner
Olivia Raynor

Council Members Present Virtually


Caleb Duarte
Ellen Gavin
Phil Mercado

Council Members Absent:


Roxanne Messina Captor, Chair
Alex Israel

Arts Council Staff Present:


Danielle Brazell, Executive Director
Ayanna Kiburi, Deputy Director
Carissa Gutierrez, Public Affairs Director
Kristin Margolis, Director of Programs
Kimberly Brown, Public Affairs Specialist
Mason Diab, Council Liaison

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 1 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
Qiana Moore, Outreach & Events Coordinator
Rebecca Ratzkin, Research & Evaluations Manager
Zachary Hill, IT Associate

1. Call to Order

Acting Chair Goodwin opened the meeting at 10:02 a.m.

2. Land and Peoples Acknowledgement

Council Member Vicki Estrada read the CAC Land and Peoples Acknowledgement into
the record and a personal statement.

3. Welcome from Alameda County Arts Commission

Rachel Osajima welcomed the CAC on behalf of the Alameda County Arts Commission
with a Powerpoint presentation.

4. Welcome from Oakland City Cultural Affairs Division

Roberto Bedoya welcomed the CAC on behalf of the Oakland City Cultural Affairs
Division with a Powerpoint presentation.

5. Roll Call, Establishment of Quorum, and Community Agreements

Council Liaison Diab conducted a roll call.

Present: Acting Chair Leah Goodwin, Gerald Clarke, Caleb Duarte, Vicki
Estrada, Ellen Gavin, Phil Mercado, Nicola Miner and Olivia Raynor.

With 8 of 10 present a quorum was achieved.

6. Chair’s Report

Acting Chair Goodwin provided a report on behalf of Chair Messina Captor.

7. Executive Director’s Report

Executive Director Brazell provided a report.

Research & Evaluations Manager Rebecca Ratzkin was introduced and briefly
commented.

8. Voting Item: Council Minutes from Previous Council Meeting

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 2 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
The October 25, 2023, December 12, 2023, and February 1, 2024 Meeting
Minutes were approved.

Council Member Clarke noted that the November 17, 2023 Minutes are in the
printed but were not provided electronically.

MOTION: Council Member Clarke moved to table the November 17, 2023
Minutes, seconded by Council Member Estrada.

Acting Chair Goodwin announced that the November 17, 2023 Minutes would be tabled
and sent back to the staff for review.

9. Presentation: Center for Cultural Power

Favianna Rodriguez shared pertinent information relating to the Center for Cultural
Power via a PowerPoint presentation.

10. Presentation: Alliance for California Traditional Arts

Amy Kitchener discussed the Alliance for California Traditional Arts (ACTA) with
attendees via a PowerPoint presentation.

11. General Public Comment

Acting Chair Goodwin explained the purpose and prohibitions for making Public
Comment at CAC meetings. Public Affairs Director Gutierrez explained the process and
provided specific instructions.

In-person Public Comment.

Hugo Morales:

• The Land Acknowledgement is important to Native People.


• Folk arts enable Native People to perpetuate their cultures.
• Christopher Columbus introduced slavery into the Americas.

Shirley Kazio Miramoto:

• My mother gifted me her music and it became an important part of my life.


• Because of the WWII internments, many Japanese Americans felt a shame
toward their culture and arts.
• Traditional arts in the Japanese American community are dying.
• By teaching and performing I am striving to keep them alive.

Megan Kraus Fijoles, Theater Bay Area:

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 3 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• Service organizations are the corral reefs of the arts ecosystem.
• We are the Bay Area’s only theater service organization.
• We are a network of over 2500 individual artists and nearly 200 theater-
producing companies.
• We have received regular SRN funding from the CAC for many years and
perplexingly we were denied this past year resulting in destabilizing our theater
work in the Bay Area.
• We urge careful consideration of your review process insofar as changes are
concerned.
• Applicant organizations need further clarification on CAC expectations.

Alexandra Urbanowski, Silicon Valley Creates:

• We are an SLP for Santa Clara County of nearly two million people.
• We thank CAC’s commitment to the field and its work on SLPs.
• We collaborate with other SLPs to expand the impacts in our region.
• We would ask that CAC agendize a future presentation on the regional impact of
the IAF and the Creative Core administrative models.

Nancy Uhm, a teaching artist:

• We support artists in schools, family dance and public parks and libraries.
• We have been a recipient of an SRN grant for the past three years.
• We ask that you consider an SRN’s potential impact when awarding funds.

Lacey Williams a San Diego Resident with Serene:

• I have worked with prison populations for over 16 years.


• I have greatly benefitted from West African drumming in my community.
• We are frequently asked to drum for cultural events.
• Our CAC grants help us continue our work in the communities we serve.

Francis Coffey, a dance teacher with Access:

• I teach Ghanian traditional music, dancing and singing.


• Classes are conducted at Richmond Elementary School.
• I received a grant last year and purchased instruments from Ghana.

Acacia Chan with Ethnic Ties:

• We run local culture-based organizations in Oakland.


• CAC grants help us continue traditional artist storytelling via regenerative tourism
in Oakland.
• We do this through our China Town, Black Oakland, and Taco Tour.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 4 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• The pandemic caused the loss of many of our elders and our CAC grant helps us
mitigate some of these losses.

Virtual Public Comment

Shira Lane, Atrium 916:

• We are a creative innovation center for sustainability.


• We appreciate our CAC grant.

Jennifer Caballero, California Association of Museums:

• We are a grateful SRN recipient.


• Now is the time for the CAC to define terms of the data collection expectation.
• Some SRNs may have the capacity to do this, but many do not.
• I recommend forming a task-specific advisory group composed of SRN
recipients.
• The California Networks Council is a possible model for this.
• Careful planning is necessary to enable the collection of information relevant to
the evaluation and development of prioritized grant initiatives.
• I would urge this action prior to finalizing guidelines.

Cecilia Yen, Film Independent, a champion of creative independence and visual


storytelling:

• We support artists and audiences who embody diversity and curiosity.


• We do not support the $5 million cap on potential applicants.
• This will harm our ability to provide critical fundraising support to small
organizations and individual artists.
• We do recognize the importance of funding smaller organizations but we urge
you to reconsider taking funding away from this group of organizations.

Nancy Olivares, California Humanities:

• We are the only non-profit devoted to promoting the humanities throughout


California. CAC funding is significantly impactful for us.
• We help to shape the future through the intersection of the arts and humanities.
• SRN funding helps amplify visual and performing arts, and public programming
through an equitable humanities lens.

Leslie Castellano, Ink People Center for the Arts and Culture:

• We are recipient of SRN funding and are excited about the data collection
requirements. We need more data to support advocacy efforts.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 5 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• Implementation is a cause for concern and CAC should create a tool kit for this
endeavor.
• The three-county requirement for regional networks creates challenges for those
of us in places affected by winter storms, fires, and geographic barriers.
• We are concerned that you will begin to see an absence of network members
located in rural areas.
• It is beneficial for organizations with small and large budgets to share a robust
network of SRNs.

Ricky Abilez, Arts for LA:

• We have concerns about the proposed SRN guidelines.


• Arts advocates generally agree that budget caps are not an effective way to
narrow eligibility because pass-through funds and/or regranting are not
accounted for.
• We generally agree with CAC’s commitment to equity and expanding funding to
smaller arts organizations.
• We also know that SRNs tend to serve as intermediaries for small arts
organizations and non-profits which is not reflected in total operating budgets.
• We recommend that the $5 million cap exclude pass-through funds and
regranting from budget totals.
• Data collection should be further clarified and delineated.

Natalia Neira, La Peña Cultural Center:

• We applaud your efforts to diversify funding.


• La Peña serves as the home to 15 roots arts classes with culture bearers from
different Latin American and Caribbean diasporas and hip-hop.
• We are an incubator for disenfranchised artists and cultural leaders.
• Our biggest need is infrastructural support enabling us to successfully apply and
navigate the grant process.

Jenny Balisle, Arts Contra Costa County, Arts CCC:

• I have been an artist, educator, curator, and administrator for over 15 years.
• The Board of Supervisors designated us and our fiscal sponsor to serve as the
County’s official local arts agency.
• Our top priority is to be an equitable and sustainable arts organization for our
county.
• We currently have an inspiring poetry program at juvenile hall.
• We are currently expanding to provide additional services.

Tracy Hudak, Californians for the Arts:

• We are an SRN grantee, and we appreciate your engagement with the field.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 6 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• We would like to see the guidelines clarified to make sure they align better with
SRN functions and serve the state more effectively.
• We strongly advise against using budget caps to determine eligibility.
• We propose that you consider a three-year average of budgets.
• You should adjust the definition of “regional” to be more self-determined by
SRNs. This is a big concern with our rural areas.

Written public comment:

• Julia Murphy, Pedal Press, Butte County


Previous or Current Grantee: JUMP StArts, Impact Projects

To the California Arts Council:


We received a Jump StArts planning grant in 2022-23. We planned our project believing
that there was also a project grant that would be available to fund the actual project.
Recent communication with CAC staff revealed that “The JMP StArts grant (including
project & planning) will not be opening or continuing for 2024 and there is no projected
date for them to reopen.”

CAC funds paid young people to participate in planning this project; and this is a
setback to their work and the subsequent project (of providing Art and screenprinting
internships to youth on probation)—as well as making us look unreliable to our partners
in the project.

From the Field Scan Report (p 30):

“To build trusting relationships, it’s important to approach communities on their own
terms (and on their own timeline), with a tangible commitment to better supporting their
needs, and then follow through on that commitment.”

The lack of follow-through and transparency in re: the project grant was…unexpected.
What is puzzling on a larger level is that CAC went to the trouble of compiling the Field
Scan Report that indicated the organization’s renewed commitment to equitable
funding.

If that is the case: why on earth would CAC discontinue a grant that specifically
benefitted the category of people who are historically excluded from artmaking
opportunities, as the data from the Field Scan Report shows?

Thank you for your time.

• Nanette Star (She/Her/Hers), Pedal Press Board Member, Butte County


Previous or Current Grantee: JUMP StArts

Dear CA Arts Council,

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 7 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
I am deeply concerned about the discontinuation of the JUMP StArts grant for 2024, as
recent communication with CAC staff revealed. This decision undermines efforts to
support underserved youth in Butte County, particularly those on probation, who rely on
these opportunities.

The lack of transparency and follow-through regarding the discontinuation of this grant
contradicts the California Arts Council’s commitment to equitable funding and
supporting communities in need, as evidenced by the Field Scan Report.

I urge the California Arts Council to reconsider its decision and reinstate the JMP StArts
grant for 2024. Investing in programs that provide arts opportunities for underserved
youth is crucial for fostering creativity, empowerment, and community engagement.

Thank you for considering my concerns. I hope that the California Arts Council will take
meaningful action to address this issue and continue to support programs that benefit
underserved youth in our community.

Sincerely,
Nanette Star
Concerned community member and Pedal Press Board Member

• Richard Stein (He/Him/His), Arts Orange County, Orange County


Previous or Current Grantee: Individual Artists Fellowships, State-Local
Partnership

Warm greetings, Chair, Council Members, Executive Director and Staff, from the
ancestral home of the Acjachemen Nation-Juaneno Band of Mission Indians. Arts
Orange County is your State-Local Partner serving this 3.2 million population county
comprised of 34 cities and a highly-diverse population, which our Board mirrors in its
composition. We also serve CAC as the Administering Organization for its Individual
Artist Fellowship Program for the 5-county Region I (Imperial, Orange, Riverside, San
Bernardino, San Diego), where we have exponentially increased the number of
applicants and recipients. Understanding that the current year budget constraints have
made it necessary to defer CAC offering this program in 2024, we look forward to
sharing with you in depth data about its impacts in our region when you make plans for
2025. We are an independent nonprofit organization with a budget of only $800,000,
and we serve more than 600 arts & cultural organizations through a robust menu of
programs. Like many SLPs, it is difficult to secure contributed income since we are
primarily a service organization and not an arts producer. Therefore, we supplement our
grants through contract services in cultural planning and public art management for
local cities. In addition to generating earned revenue, this strengthens our advocacy
networks which we employ regularly to connect with our State Legislators and to
promote increased funding for the CAC. Learn more about us at ArtsOC.org.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 8 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• Elida Ledesma (She/Her/Hers), Arts for Healing and Justice Network, Los
Angeles County
Previous or Current Grantee: Creative Youth Development (formerly Youth Arts
Action), Statewide and Regional Networks
RE: Agenda Item 11. VOTING ITEM: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

As a current recipient of the State and Regional Networks, our organization is able to
sustain the various pieces of work necessary for successful partnerships. This funding
is enabling us to support smaller organizations while they build out their capacity but it
also helps us leverage our collective impact. While I understand the intention behind
setting a budget cap, I strongly urge the CAC to reconsider as that would have an
impact on larger organizations that are still crucial to the arts ecosystem. I believe the
CAC should factor in whether funds are being regranted and what populations are being
served. The SRN’s serve a vital role in our sector and the impact of our work is more
nuanced than that of direct service organizations. We invite the council to engage in
thoughtful conversations with existing SRN’s to better understand our impact and
challenges before implementing reforms that could negatively impact many
organizations receiving this source of funding.

• Sarah Weber (She/Her/Hers), Association of California Symphony Orchestras,


Los Angeles County
Previous or Current Grantee: Statewide and Regional Networks
RE: Agenda Item 11. VOTING ITEM: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

Thanks to the Council for maintaining the SRN program. I would like to share 3
recommendations to the SRN program revisions.

1 - REVISE THE $5M BUDGET CAP REQUIREMENT: Do not place a budget cap on
eligibility, as budget level alone does not accurately reflect capacity or impact. If there
must be a cap, adjust the $5M budget threshold requirement by excluding from budget
totals any pass-thru funds or fiscal sponsorship revenues. Also, consider a 3-year
average for budgets.

2 - REFINE DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENT: While supportive of the potential of


this recommendation, concerns exist about the nature, composition, and expectations of
the data collection, as well as SRNs capacity to undertake research. CAC should
develop the survey instruments and fund SRNs to disseminate. Or form a Data
Collection Advisory Group comprised of SRNs and SLPs to help define research scope
and methods, clarify what needs to be measured, and ensure against harmful data
extraction.

3 - REVISE DEFINITION of “REGIONS”: A more nuanced and self-determined


definition of “region” is needed that better fits arts service orgs’ work, which often does
not neatly align with county boundaries or population numbers. SRNs should be able to
clearly describe and define our own cultural network or service areas, and then

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 9 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
evaluated on our impact. And capacity is an important factor, especially in rural areas
that face barriers like terrain, distance, weather, and lack of access to other funding.

• Jessica Mele (She/Her/Hers), Create CA, Los Angeles County


Previous or Current Grantee: Creative Youth Development (formerly Youth Arts
Action), Statewide and Regional Networks
RE: Agenda Item 11. VOTING ITEM: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

Thank you for recognizing the value of state and regional networks to a healthy arts
ecosystem. Our work at Create CA in arts education policy and advocacy could not be
done without a statewide network of advocates (artists, teachers, teaching artists,
parents, students and school administrators). This network has become essential since
the passage of Prop 28, and the need to ensure that training, materials, information and
support reaches school communities in all 58 counties of California.

We appreciate the value of the $5m budget cap. To account for one-time increases in
revenue that could be the result of a multi-year grant whose funds are all received in
one fiscal year, we recommend a three year average be used to assess organizational
size. In addition, we recommend that re-granting dollars and fiscally-sponsored projects
(efforts that are a net neutral to an organization’s bottom line) be excluded from the $5m
budget cap calculation.

We appreciate the data component of the new guidelines. And at the same time, as an
arts education advocacy organization, our data collection includes information on
students, schools, and advocates in our networks. These data may not be compatible
with the CAC’s expected data points pertaining to communities of (non-student,
practicing) artists and culture bearers. We suggest that the CAC clarify its goals around
data collection so that we can best assess how to meet them, given our organizational
structure and resources.

• Cynthia PEPPER (She/Her/Hers), CPDANCEworks, Marin County


Previous or Current Grantee: Artists in Schools, Arts and Accessibility

I feel and have direct evidence to support my stance that the CAC prefers and favors
diversity choices over artistic choices for all your grants, programming and projects.
Marin County and Caucasian people are completely left out and the reverse prejudice is
blatant. Very unfair and quite shameful. Diversity over Artistry. Look at the individual
grants! I stand corrected.

• Shayla James (She/Her/Hers), San Diego Creative Youth Development Network,


San Diego County
Previous or Current Grantee: Statewide and Regional Networks
RE: Agenda Item 11. VOTING ITEM: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 10 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
I am the Director of the San Diego Creative Youth Development Network (SDCYDN). I
was looking forward to seeing the proposed Statewide and Regional Network (SRN)
grant guidelines and was interested in reading the reconfigured guidelines. I have two
main recommendations for the Council to consider. Data Collection is informative,
necessary, and can be exciting for those collecting information and those sharing their
information. However, I have concerns about what data will be collected, how, and why.
I would like more clarity about what data collection entails. Also, gathering data takes
additional administrative labor, so how can the Council create supports, especially for
smaller organization capacity? Can the CAC create a survey and data collection tool to
distribute to SRNs, with our input about what data will be collected? Also, how the data
is collected is important to ensure data extraction methods that cause harm do not
occur.

My second recommendation for the Council is to more clearly define a regional network.
The SDCYDN works across communities and geography, however we practice depth
instead breadth of our work. While some members in other Counties attend our virtual
meetings, we primarily serve communities in SD County. The SDCYDN is a supporter of
the SRN grant and I ask for clarity in the proposed guidelines, so that I can better
understand what SRNs the CAC is seeking to invest in through the revised SRN
guidelines.

• Meg Hamill (She/Her/Hers), California Poets in the Schools, Sonoma County


Previous or Current Grantee: Artists in Schools, Impact Projects
RE: Agenda Item 11. VOTING ITEM: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

As the ED of California Poets in the Schools, I am grateful to the CAC for a decades-
long funding relationship supporting both our work in schools, as well as our network of
professional poets throughout the state. We offer a professional, network experience
for California poets that includes over 60 annual training and networking events, a 3-day
poetry conference, fundraising assistance, affiliation with a nationally-recognized
nonprofit, as well as a clear pathway to earn income and give back to their local
communities as Poet-Teachers. Our grassroots model allows us a unique ability to
engage communities of poets in any town in CA, and indeed our programs are
flourishing in some of the most remote regions. We have received the SRN grant for
many years, however we did not receive the grant this past year. To my knowledge,
there were no organizations specifically serving networks of poets who received SRN
funding in 2023. After this council considered shutting down the SRN program
altogether, and after carefully reading through the guidelines this year, I find myself
confused about the overarching vision that the current council holds for this grant
program. It seems much narrower than the past. This grant is vital to our ability to
serve our network and I sincerely hope that the vision for this program remains broad
and supple enough to continue engaging specific arts networks such as ours so that we
can continue to provide critical arts services throughout the state.

• Michael Tamony (He/Him/His), The Center for the Arts, Nevada County

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 11 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
Previous or Current Grantee: Artists in Schools, Arts Education Exposure,
Creative Youth Development (formerly Youth Arts Action)

The Center for the Arts in Grass Valley is the most established arts 501c3 in the rural
Foothills above Sacramento. We serve a rural population that is in desperate need for
arts and arts education. We are grateful for the support we have received from the
California Arts Council. While me may be known for sold out concerts like Lyle Lovett,
Keb’ Mo’, Blind Boys of Alabama, and others, we are also presenting enriching content
like WorldFest, children’s theater productions, and a host of arts-related programs.

Our recent grant from CAC, helped deliver a children’s theater production of Mozart that
was seen by a packed house, primarily children who had never even seen live theater.

We are writing to the CAC Board to emphasize the need to support rural community art.
Nevada County, including Grass Valley and Nevada City have a vibrant arts community
that is in serious need of support from agencies like CAC, especially through an
established entity like The Center for the Arts.

We have a history of success, but we can not succeed alone. We need you.

(A lunch break was taken from 12:26 p.m. to 1:06 p.m.)

12. Voting Item: 2024 Grant Programs Guidelines

Acting Chair Goodwin called the afternoon session to order and called for Item 12 to be
presented.

Program managers Elisa Gollub and Carlos Casillas briefly introduced this item.
Program Manger Casillas presented a detailed history and development summary of the
program.

Council Member Gavin of the Programs Policy Committee covered the history and
development of the Programs Policy Committee.

Acting Chair Goodwin noted that the Programs Policy Committee did look at the
Decision Support Tool to inform their decisions.

A list of decisions to be made by the Council was read into the record by Acting Chair
Goodwin.

Executive Director Brazell noted that this is part of the CAC’s commitment to
transparent and informed decision-making. As part of the Strategic Framework this
Decision Support Tool is also a bedrock.

Public Comment

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 12 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
Acting Chair Goodwin explained the purpose and prohibitions for making Public
Comment at CAC meetings. Public Affairs Director Gutierrez explained the process and
provided specific instructions.

In-person Public Comment

Alma Robinson, Executive Director, California Lawyers for the Arts

• We thank you for continuing the Statewide and Regional Networks Program.
• This is our 50th year and we provide legal services, educational programs, and
advocacy for the arts community.
• We work extensively with formerly incarcerated individuals.

Jorge Courtade, Arts & Community Development Program Manager, California Lawyers
for the Arts:

• I work with continuation students and meet with them monthly.


• We explore ways for artists to have a sustainable career path in the arts.

Virtual Public Comment

Susana Villalon, Founder, California Academy of the Arts:

• We were established in April 2023, and this is new to me.


• Our mission is to provide jobs for young artists and art teachers.
• We are a cultural dance studio focusing on Mexican, Peruvian, Colombian and
South American folk dance while also incorporating Hip-Hop.

Liz Baselia, LA Swing Dance Posse:

• We are a small 501(C)(3) that is a dance team endeavoring to preserve, protect,


and teach vernacular jazz and swing dancing.
• We are excited to see the continuation of funding for small organizations.

Felicia Shaw, Executive Director, San Diego Regional Arts & Culture Coalition:

• We are an arts advocacy and arts services organization serving San Diego
County.
• We thank you for listening to the field and making appropriate decisions to the
SRN Guidelines.
I would encourage you to ensure that the review panels are adequately trained.

MOTION: Council Member Clarke moved to accept the recommendation of the


Programs Policy Committee to approve the Statewide and Regional Networks Program
Guidelines including the policy change to restrict applications from applying for the SRN

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 13 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
grants with a total revenue equal or greater than $5 million in the most recently
completed fiscal year, seconded by Council Member Estrada.

Council Discussion

Council Liaison Diab read the following into the record:

MOTION:
The motion from Council Member Raynor is to amend the Guidelines to add “outreach”
and “communications” to the list of areas demonstrated for accessibility and to delete
the list of disabilities, seconded by Council Member Estrada.

VOTE:

YES: Council Members: Clarke, Duarte, Estrada, Gavin, Miner, Raynor, and Acting
Chair Goodwin.

NO: 0

ASTAIN: 0

There were 7 Yes Votes and 0 No Votes. The motion passed.

Council Liaison Diab read the following into the record:

MOTION:
The motion as moved by Council Member Clarke is to accept the recommendation of
the Programs Policy Committee as amended by Council Member Raynor to approve the
Statewide and Regional Networks Program Guidelines including the policy change to
restrict applicants from applying for the SRN grants that have total revenues equal to or
greater than $5 million in the most recently completed fiscal year, seconded by Council
Member Estrada.

VOTE:

YES: Council Members: Clarke, Duarte, Estrada, Gavin, Miner, Raynor, and Acting
Chair Goodwin.

NO: 0

ABSTAIN: 0

There were 7 yes Votes and 0 No Votes.

Member Raynor advocated for revising Council verbiage to make access to the CAC
more positive and inviting and that applicant accessibility managers be identified.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 14 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
Vice Chair Goodwin noted that a two-year average pertaining to applicant budgets has
been used in the past and that a three-year average was not considered by the
Programs Policy Committee.

The $5 million dollar cap was informed by the field and perhaps the new Programs
Policy Committee can revisit this stipulation.

Council Member Gavin was open to considering a three-year average and Director of
Programs Margolis stated that pass-through funds are considered when looking at the
total for applicant budgets.

Council Member Estrada recommended that a more welcoming verbiage should be


applied to all CAC programs.

Director of Programs Margolis noted that there had been a reconvening of SRNs in
2018 and additional ones before that. Quantifying the amount of pass-through funds
per applicant has not been done and the process and procedures for such have not
been established.

Executive Director Brazell emphasized the incredible importance of the Decision


Support Tool informing decision-making by the CAC.

Council Member Clarke had concerns about the staff’s ability to determine total
revenues including pass-through funds and other factors not currently delineated.

13. Presentation: Californians for the Arts

Julie Baker made a presentation via Powerpoint presentation. Historical data and
ongoing developments specific to Californians for the Arts were discussed.

Council Members thanked Julie and briefly touched on various aspects of the details
given during the presentation.

14. Committee Reports

Council Member Clarke of the Equity Committee shared his and Council Member
Duarte’s report with the Council. An update was given and potentially useful information
for future Equity Committee endeavors was provided.

15. In Memoriam

• Ed Reed from Richmond was a jazz vocalist and toured national venues.
• Glynis Johns was remembered for her role in Mary Poppins, died at 100.
• Norman Jewison produced and directed socially important films.
• Hinton Battle was the Scarecrow in “The Wiz”.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 15 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024
• Lisa Lopez-Galvan was killed in the mass shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs’
Celebration.
• We acknowledge the Palestinian and Israeli writers who have died long before
their time.
• Inas Al-Saqa was a Palestinian playwright and actress.
• Yahav Winner was an Israeli filmmaker murdered in the Hamas attack.
• Halima Karim Al-Kahlot created work using unconventional materials such as
brooms and cardboard to explore themes of social justice.
• Matan Elmalam was an Israeli DJ and producer killed by Hamas.
• We lost Seiji Ozawa and N. Scott Momady who live long and artistic lives. Seiji
was a well-known world-class conductor. N. Scott was the first Native American
novelist to win the Pulitzer Prize.
• Alexei Anatolyevich Navalny was an amazing Russian opposition leader.
• Radcliffe Bailey was an artist out of Atlanta who was very well known.

16. Adjournment

Acting Chair Goodwin adjourned the meeting at 3:11 p.m.

California Arts Council Meeting – Minutes Page 16 of 16


Friday, March 1, 2024

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy