23 (1) Reddy
23 (1) Reddy
Atomic Spectroscopy 32
Vol. 23(1), January/February 2002
Vol. 23(1), January/February 2002
TABLE III
Wavelength Selected for the
Determination of Each Element
No. Elements Wavelength
(nm)
1. Tantalum 263.558
2. Niobium 295.088
3. Titanium 334.941
4. Iron 239.562
5. Manganese 257.610
6. Tin 242.170
7. Tungsten 207.921
Fig. 1. TFM sample container vessel used in the microwave digestion system.
33
lite, USA) for three hours at 950ºC. TABLE IV
The cooled melt was dissolved in a Comparison of MDS and Fusion Technique
Teflon® beaker with 30 mL of 20% (Results in %)
(v/v) HCl. It should be noted that No. Elements Reported valuesa MDSb Spectra fluxb
some precipitate still remained in
the solution. The supernatent 1 Niobium 17.48 17.41± 0.09 17.21±0.12
solution was decanted and 10 mL of 2 Tantalum 33.16 32.98±0.07 31.12±0.10
10% (v/v) HF and 5 mL H2O2 (50 3 Titanium 2.70 2.62±0.02 2.49±0.09
volumes) were added to achieve 4 Iron 5.89 5.77±0.02 5.63±0.08
complete dissolution; excess HF 5 Tungsten 0.91 0.86±0.032 0.77±0.04
was removed by boiling the solu- 6 Tin 7.79 7.67±0.04 6.83±0.18
tion. The two solutions were mixed 7 Manganese 4.77 4.70±0.04 4.61±0.12
and made up to 100 mL volume
a
before aspiration into the plasma. Values reported by AMD, Hyderabad, India.
b
The blank was prepared in a similar ± SD of 5 readings.
way but without the analytes. TABLE V
Results Obtained with Different Acids in Microwave Digestion
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION (Results in %)
a
Sample Elements HCl HNO3a Aqua HFa Reported
The reaction speed and No. regiaa values
efficiency of the sample decomposi-
tion can be improved with an 1 Niobium 0.064±0.04 0.064±0.02 0.0160±0.05 12.80±0.12 17.48
increase in temperature. As a rule 2 Tantalum 0.040±0.03 0.007±0.03 0.020±0.04 26.46±0.18 33.16
of thumb, a temperature increase of 3 Titanium 0.064±0.05 0.007±0.03 0.042±0.03 2.21±0.08 2.70
10ºC doubles the reaction speed. In 4 Iron 0.456±0.03 0.176±0.03 0.586±0.03 4.60±0.10 5.89
the pressure-controlled operation,
5 Tungsten 0.003±0.05 0.005±0.02 0.004±0.06 0.59±0.15 0.91
the temperature in the vessel is
dependent on the reagent mixture 6 Tin 0.972±0.06 0.095±0.04 0.983±0.09 4.26±0.18 7.79
and on the amount of gaseous prod- 7 Manganese 0.825±0.05 0.412±0.05 0.874±0.04 3.60±0.14 4.77
ucts formed during the decomposi- a ± SD of 5 readings.
tion process. It is beneficial to run
the digestions at the highest tem- columbite ore, except for Sn using Analytical Results for Ore in Dif-
perature allowed by the vessel the fusion method, agreed within ferent Acids and Acid Mixtures
design. 2% of the reported values. The The goal of this work was to
microwave digestion method was establish the reactivity of ore in
Comparison of Analytical found to be very accurate, showed
Results different acids in order to
good reproducibility, and required concentrate/purify the ore before
In order to evaluate the accuracy limited time for the complete disso- dissolution in HF medium. The
of the developed analytical method, lution of the samples. The analytical acids used were added starting with
a matrix standard was prepared and results are closely related to the HNO3, HCl, aqua regia, and ending
the tantalite-columbite ore analyzed reported values. The concentration with HF. Special care was taken to
using the fusion technique and of each element in the blank solu- rinse the sample particle from the
microwave dissolution. The wave- tion throughout all analytical proce- reaction vessel walls of the
length for each element was identi- dures was less than the ICP-OES microwave digestion system. Due
fied using the Image Software of the detection limits. to partial dissolution, repeated and
ICP-OES instrument, which scans careful washings of the filtrate were
the entire spectrum from 180 nm to The method developed was
verified by using two certified made prior to making up the sam-
495 nm in two minutes. The analyti- ple in a standard flask after filtra-
cal results of the sample, dissolved standards, 206GB34 and 206 A
TAN1, from MBH Analytical Ltd., tion. The results obtained with
by microwave digestion and by different acids are given in Table V.
fusion, are given in Table IV. The UK, and the results are presented in
Table VI. It can been seen that the Except for HF, no other acids or
analytical values and reproducibility acid mixtures showed any apprecia-
are represented by the standard experimental values are very close
to the certified values, indicating ble reactivity with the ore.
deviation from the measurements
of five readings for each sample. that the microwave digestion proce-
The analytical results of tantalite- dure can be adopted for the analysis
of tantalite ore.
34
Vol. 23(1), January/February 2002
TABLE VI
Analysis of Certified Standards
(Results in %)
Sample No. Elements 206GB34 MDS Fusion 206 A TAN1 MDS Fusion
(certified values) (certified values)
1 Tantalum 40.88 40.70±0.08 38.60±0.12 0.236 0.232±0.07 0.205±0.18
2 Niobium 18.95 18.85±0.04 17.20±0.10 0.02 0.021±0.04 0.018±0.20
3 Titanium 0.74 0.71±0.02 0.65±0.09 NR NA NA
4 Iron NR NA NA 0.20 0.19±0.12 0.16±0.15
5 Manganese NR NA NA 0.02 0.018±0.15 0.017±0.13
6 Tin NR NA NA 0.01 0.0098±0.16 0.0065±0.28
NR = Not reported.
NA = Not analyzed.
* ± SD of 5 readings.
35