$~60, 61 and 62

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 4606/2022

SUDHIR KUMAR SOLANKI AND ORS ..... Petitioners

Through: Mr.Mohan Kumar and Ms.Meenu
Chaudhary, Advocates with
petitioners 1,3,4 and 5 in person.
Petitioner No.2 and 6 are stated to
suffering from fever.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents

Through: Mr.Shoaib Haider, APP for State with
SI Dhananjay Kumar, Police Station
Dwarka South
Mr.Rahul Bakshi, Advocate for R-2
withR-2 in person.

+ CRL.M.C. 4610/2022
SWEETY AGGARWAL AND ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rahul Bakshi, Advocate with
petitioner Nos.1 to 4 in person

versus

STATE AND ANR ..... Respondent

Through: Mr.Shoaib Haider, APP for State with
SI Dhananjay Police Station Dwarka
South
Mr.Mohan Kumar and Ms.Meenu
Chauidhary, Advocates for R-2 with
R-2 in person.

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 + CRL.M.C. 4611/2022
HEMANT AGGARWAL AND ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr.Rahul Bakshi, Advocate with
petitioners in person

versus

STATE AND ANR & ANR. ..... Respondents

Through: Mr.Shoaib Haider, APP for State
With SI Sandeep Yadav
Mr.Mohan Kumar and Ms.Meenu
Chaudhary, Advocates for R-2 with
R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA
ORDER
% 15.09.2022
Crl.M.A. No. 18680/2022 in Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022
Crl.M.A. No.18697/2022 in Crl.M.C. No. 4610/2022
Crl.M.A. No. 18700/2022 in Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022, 4610/2022 and 4611/2022
Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022 has been filed by the petitioner Nos. 1 to 6,
namely, Sudhir Kumar Solanki, Bhupender Singh Solanki, Rakhi Solanki,
Meena Solanki, Bidhya Devi and Neelam Solanki seeking quashing of the
FIR No. 162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860;
Crl.M.C. No. 4610/2022 has been filed by the petitioner Nos.1 to 4,
namely, Sweety Aggarwal, Ashima Wadhawan, Nitin Wadhawan and
Hemant Aggarwal seeking quashing of the FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station
Dwarka South registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 Penal Code, 1860 and;
Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022 has filed by the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3,
namely, Hemant Aggarwal, Sweety Aggarwal and Ashima Wadhawan
seeking quashing of the FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam Village
registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
In as much as the three petitions are premised on the same settlement
agreement dated 2.2.2022 arrived at between the parties to the petition, it has
been considered appropriate to take the three petitions together.
The Investigating Officers of all the FIRs are present and have
identified the complainants of the said FIRs arrayed as respondent No.2 of
the respective petitions. Inter alia, the Investigating Officers have also
identified the accused arrayed in each of the FIR though the Investigating
Officer in Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022 is not in a position to identify the
petitioner No.2 and petitioner No.6 thereof, namely, Bhupender Singh
Solanki and Neelam Solanki, in respect of whom it is submitted by the
counsel that the said petitioners are unable to be present in Court being
unwell qua which petitioners, i.e., Petitioner No.2 Bhupender Singh Solanki
and Petitioner No.6 Neelam Solanki, the complainant of the said FIR No.
162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 arrayed as respondent
No.2 to the present petition, i.e.Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022, has identified the
said petitioners No. 2 and 6, i.e., Bhupender Singh Solanki and Neelam
Solanki, from the proofs of their identities placed on record at pages 115 and
119 of Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022, and submits that in view of the settlement
arrived at between the parties to the petition vide settlement dated 2.2.2022
she does not seek any further proceedings against the said accused persons
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 as well as the other person arrayed as accused in the instant case, i.e., the
petitioner Nos. 1 to 6 to the petition.
The respondent No.2 of the Crl.M.C. 4610/2022 also arrayed as
respondent No.2 in Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022 , Rakhi Solanki in her
deposition on oath in replies to specific Court queries has affirmed having
signed her affidavit dated 13.9.2022 and the settlement document dated
2.2.2022 arrived at between the parties to the petitions voluntarily of her
own accord without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter. Inter
alia, she states that in terms of the said settlement arrived at between her and
the petitioners a total settled sum of Rs.24,50,000/- had been agreed to be
paid to her by the petitioners of which a sum of Rs.20,50,000/- had been
received by her previously and the balance sum of Rs.4,00,000/- has paid to
her today during the course of the present proceedings vide a Demand Draft
bearing No. 501640 dated 31.8.2022 drawn on ICICI Bank in her name. And
she thus states that there are now no further claims of hers left against the
petitioners arrayed to the petitions Crl.M.C. No. 4611/ 2022 nor against the
petitioners arrayed to the Crl.M.C.4610/2022. Inter alia, she states that she
does not oppose the prayer made by the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 in Crl.M.C.
No. 4611/2022 namely, Hemant Aggarwal, Sweety Aggarwal and Ashima
Wadhawan seeking quashing of the FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam
Village registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860, nor does she oppose the prayer made by the petitioners No. 1 to 4 of
Crl.M.C. No.4610/2022, seeking the quashing of the FIR No. 166/2019
Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 nor does she want the
petitioners thereof of the respective petitions to be punished in relation
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 thereto and the respondent No.2, Rakhi Solanki, has further affirmed the
factum of dissolution of her marriage with the petitioner No.1 of Crl.M.C.
No. 4611/2022 (petitioner No. 3 of Crl.M.C.No.4610/2022) has since been
dissolved vide a decree of divorce dated 18.5.2022 in HMA No. 964/2022
through mutual consent under Section 13 B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act,
1955 of the Court of the Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka (South). She further
deposed that there is no child born of the wedlock between her and the
petitioner No.1 of Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022. Inter alia, she states that she is a
graduate and has made her statement voluntarily of her own accord without
any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter after understanding the
implications of it and that she does not need to think again.
Likewise the respondent No.2 of Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022,
complainant of FIR No. 162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered
under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in her
deposition on oath has affirmed having signed her affidavit and the
settlement document dated 2.2.2022 arrived at between the parties to the
petition (Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022) voluntarily of her own accord without
any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter and further states that she
has signed the same without any coercion from any quarter after
understanding the implications thereof. She has further stated that she has
done Masters in IT and has understood the implications making the
statement which she states that she has made after understanding the
implications thereof.
The learned APP for the State, in the circumstances, does not oppose
the prayer made by the petitioners of Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022, 4610/2022
and 4611/2022, seeking the quashing of the respective FIRs, i.e., FIR No.
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Crl.M.C. No.
4606/2022); FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered
under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
(Crl.M.C. No. 4610/2022) and FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam
Village registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022), in view of the settlement arrived at between
the parties to the petitions in terms of the settlement agreement dated
2.2.2022 and settlement of all the claims of Rakhi Solanki, as deposed by
her, in view of the deposition of the complainants of the FIRs, i.e., FIR
No.162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South arrayed as respondent No.2 to
Crl.M.C. No. 4606/2022 and in view of the deposition of complainant of
FIR No. 166/2019, Police Station Dwarka South and FIR No. 139/2020 and
arrayed as respondent no.2 to Crl.M.C. No. 4610/2022 and Crl.M.C. No.
4611/2022 and the factum that they have both been identified by the
Investigating Officers of the cases and there being no reason to disbelieve
their statements that they have arrived at a settlement with the petitioners of
the respective petitions arrayed as accused in respective FIRs registered on
their complaints, they being both educated and having stated that they have
understood the implications of the statement made by them which they have
made voluntarily of their own accord without any duress, pressure or
coercion from any quarter with the FIR having apparently been emanated
from a matrimonial discords between Rakhi Solanki and Hemant Aggarwal
which apparently stands resolved by the dissolution of the marriage between
the said two person vide a decree of divorce through mutual consent
aforementioned, for maintenance of peace and harmony between them it is
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 considered appropriate to put a quietus to the litigations between them qua
the FIRs in terms of the verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Narender
Singh &Ors. V. State of Punjab; (2014) 6 SCC 466 wherein it has been
observed vide paragraph 31(IV) to the effect:-
“31. In view of the aforesaid discussion, we sum up
and lay down the following principles by which the
High Court would be guided in giving adequate
treatment to the settlement between the parties and
exercising its power under Section 482 of the Code
while accepting the settlement and quashing the
proceedings or refusing to accept the settlement with
direction to continue with the criminal proceedings:
(I) ……..
(II) ……..
(III) ……..
(IV) On the other, those criminal cases having
overwhelmingly and pre-dominantly civil character,
particularly those arising out of commercial
transactions or arising out of matrimonial relationship
or family disputes should be quashed when the parties
have resolved their entire disputes among themselves.
……………….”
and in view of the observations of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian
Singh vs. State of Punjab & Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, to the effect : -
“58............................ No doubt, crimes are acts which
have harmful effect on the public and consist in
wrongdoing that seriously endangers and threatens the
well-being of the society and it is not safe to leave the
crime-doer only because he and the victim have settled
the dispute amicably or that the victim has been paid
compensation, yet certain crimes have been made
compoundable in law, with or without the permission of
the court. In respect of serious offences like murder, rape,
dacoity, etc., or other offences of mental depravity under
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IPC or offences of moral turpitude under special statutes,
like the Prevention of Corruption Act or the offences
committed by public servants while working in that
capacity, the settlement between the offender and the
victim can have no legal sanction at all. However, certain
offences which overwhelmingly and predominantly bear
civil flavour having arisen out of civil, mercantile,
commercial, financial, partnership or such like
transactions or the offences arising out of matrimony,
particularly relating to dowry, etc. or the family dispute,
where the wrong is basically to the victim and the
offender and the victim have settled all disputes between
them amicably, irrespective of the fact that such
offences have not been made compoundable, the High
Court may within the framework of its inherent power,
quash the criminal proceeding or criminal complaint or
FIR if it is satisfied that on the face of such settlement,
there is hardly any likelihood of the offender being
convicted and by not quashing the criminal proceedings,
justice shall be casualty and ends of justice shall be
defeated. The above list is illustrative and not
exhaustive. Each case will depend on its own facts and
no hard-and-fast category can be prescribed.” [Refer to
B.S. Joshi, (2003) 4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant, (2008)
9 SCC 677 and Manoj Sharma, (2008) 16 SCC 1.]”
and in view of the verdict of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra
Raghuvanshi &Ors. Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi &Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, to
the effect : -
“15. In our view, it is the duty of the courts to
encourage genuine settlements of matrimonial disputes,
particularly, when the same are on considerable
increase. Even if the offences are non-compoundable, if
they relate to matrimonial disputes and the Court is
satisfied that the parties have settled the same amicably
and without any pressure, we hold that for the purpose
of securing ends of justice, Section 320 of the Code
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 would not be a bar to the exercise of power of quashing
of FIR, complaint or the subsequent criminal
proceedings.
16. There has been an outburst of matrimonial disputes
in recent times. They institution of marriage occupies
an important place and it has an important role to play
in the society. Therefore, every effort should be made in
the interest of the individuals in order to enable them to
settle down in life and live peacefully. If the parties
ponder over their defaults and terminate their disputes
amicably b m utual agreement instead of fighting it out
in a court of law, in order to do complete justice in the
matrimonial matters, the courts should be less hesitant
in exercising their extraordinary jurisdiction. It is trite
to state that the power under Section 482 should be
exercised sparingly and with circumspection only when
the Court is convinced, on the basis of material on
record, that allowing the proceedings to continue would
be an abuse of process of court or that the ends of
justice require that the proceedings ought to be
quashed….”
(emphasis supplied),
In view thereof, FIR No. 162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South
registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against
petitioners No. 1 to 6, namely Sudhir Kumar Solanki, Bhupender Singh
Solanki, Rakhi Solanki, Meena Solanki, Bidhya Devi and Neelam Solanki;
FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all consequential
proceedings emanating therefrom against petitioners No. 1 to 4, namely,
Sweety Aggarwal, Ashima Wadhawan, Nitin Wadhawan and Hemant
Aggarwal and; FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam Village registered
under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 consequential proceedings emanating therefrom against petitioners No. 1 to
3, namely, Hemant Aggarwal, Sweety Aggarwal and Ashima Wadhawan,
are thus quashed.
The petitions are disposed of accordingly.

ANU MALHOTRA, J
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022/SV

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 62
Crl. M.C. 4611/2022
HEMANT AGGARWAL & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR.

CW-1 SI SANDEEP POLICE STATION PALAM VILLAGE

ON S.A.

I have been deputed to attend the proceedings qua the FIR No.
139/2020 Police Station Palam Village registered under Sections
498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. I identify the petitioners No.1
to 3, namely, Hemant Aggarwal, Sweety Aggarwal and Ashima Wadhawan
present in the Court today as being the three accused arrayed in the FIR in
question. I identify the respondent no.2 Rakhi Solanki, present in the Court
today, as being the complainant of the FIR in question.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J

15.09.2022.

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 61
Crl. M.C. 4610/2022
SWEETY AGGARWAL & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR.

CW-1 SI DHANANJAY POLICE STATION DWARKA SOUTH

ON S.A.

I am the Investigating Officer qua FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station

Dwarka South registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860. I identify the petitioners No.1 to 4, namely, Sweety
Aggarwal, Ashima Wadhawan, Nitin Wadhawan and Hemant Aggarwal,
present in the Court today as being the four accused arrayed in the FIR in
question. I identify the respondent no.2 Ms.X, present in the Court today, as
being the complainant of the FIR in question.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J

15.09.2022.

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 61 and 62
Crl. M.C. 4610/2022 and Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022

SWEETY AGGARWAL & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR.

AND
HEMANT AGGARWAL & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR

CW-2 MS RAKHI SOLANKI D/O SH. SUDHIR KUMAR SOLANKI

R/O RZF 478/32, STREET No.45, SADH NAGAR-II PALAM
COLONY, DELHI
On S.A.
My affidavit dated 13.9.2022 as the non-opposition to the prayer
made by the petitioners to the present petition (Crl.M.C. No.4610/2022)
seeking quashing of the FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station Dwarka South
registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860, and the petitioners of Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022 seeking the quashing of
the FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam Village registered under
Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the settlement
document dated 13.9.2022 executed between me and the petitioners bear my
signatures thereon which I have signed voluntarily of my own accord
without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter.
In terms of the said settlement the marriage between me and the
petitioner No.1 of Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022 has since been dissolved vide a
decree of divorce dated 18.5.2022 in HMA No. 964/2022 through mutual
consent under Section 13 B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 of the Court
of the Judge, Family Courts, Dwarka (South). There is no child born of the
wedlock between me and the petitioner No.1 of Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022. In
terms of the settlement a total settled sum of Rs.24,50,000/- had to be paid to
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 me by the petitioners of which I have received a sum of Rs. 20,50,000/-
from the petitioners previously and the balance sum of Rs.4,00,000/- has
been handed over to me today in Court during the course of the present
proceedings in the form of a Demand draft bearing No. 501640 dated
31.8.2022 drawn on ICICI Bank in my name. There are now no claims of
mine left against the petitioners.
In terms of the settlement dated 2.2.2022, I thus do not oppose the
prayer made by the petitioner Nos. 1 to 3 in Crl.M.C. No. 4611/2022
namely, Hemant Aggarwal, Sweety Aggarwal and Ashima Wadhawan
seeking quashing of the FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam Village
registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, nor
do I oppose the prayer made by the petitioners No. 1 to 4 of Crl.M.C.
No.4610/2022, seeking the quashing of the FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station
Dwarka South registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860, nor do I want them to be punished in relation thereto. In
terms of the said settlement in as much as there has been also settlement qua
FIR No. 162/2019, Police Station Dwarka South, registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 of which the
complainant is Ashima Wadhawan.
I am a graduate. I have made my statement voluntarily of my own
accord without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter after
understanding the implications of it. I do not need to think again.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J

15.09.2022

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 60
Crl. M.C. 4606/2022
SUDHIR KUMAR SOLANKI & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR.

CW-1 SI DHANANJAY POLICE STATION DWARKA SOUTH

ON S.A.

I am the Investigating Officer qua FIR No. 162/2019 Police Station

Dwarka South registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860. I identify the petitioners No.1, 3, 4 and 5 namely, Sudhir
Kumar Solanki, Rakhi Solanki, Meena Solanki, Bidhya Devi, present in the
Court today as being the four of the six accused arrayed in the FIR in
question (petitioner No.2 Bhupender Singh Solanki and his wife i.e.
petitioner No.6 Neelam Solanki are stated to unable to be present being
suffering from fever). I identify the respondent no.2 Ms.X, present in the
Court today, as being the complainant of the FIR in question.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J

15.09.2022.

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI
Item No. 60
Crl. M.C. 4606/2022
SUDHIR KUMAR SOLANKI & ORS . Vs. STATE & ANR.

CW-2 MS. X W/O NITIN WADHAWAN AGED 30 YEARS R/O 226,

NEW ADARSH NAGAR, FEROZEPUR PUNJAB-152002
ON S.A.

My affidavit dated 13.9.2022 as the non-opposition to the prayer

made by the petitioners and the settlement document dated 2.2.2022 bear my
signatures thereon which I have signed voluntarily of my own accord
without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter.
In as much as vide the settlement document dated 2.2.2022 it has been
a settlement seeking closure of all the three cross FIRs,i.e, FIR No.
162/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered under Sections
323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; (in which I am the
complainant) and FIR No. 166/2019 Police Station Dwarka South registered
under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and;
FIR No. 139/2020 Police Station Palam Village registered under Sections
498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 of which Ms.Rakhi Solanki is
the complainant, i.e., respondent No.2 in Crl.M.C. No. 4610/2022 and
4611/2022.
I identify the petitioner No.2 Bhupender Singh Solanki and the
petitioner no.6 Neelam Solanki, the wife of the petitioner No.2 from the
proofs of their identities placed on record at pages 115 and 119 of Crl.M.C.
No. 4606/2022.
In terms of the said settlement I thus do not oppose the prayer made
by the petitioners No. 1 to 6, namely Sudhir Kumar Solanki, Bhupender
Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.
 Singh Solanki, Rakhi Solanki, Meena Solanki, Bidhya Devi and Neelam
Solanki seeking the quashing of the FIR No. 162/2019 Police Station
Dwarka South registered under Sections 323/354/354B/509/34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 nor do I want them to be punished in relation thereto.
I have done Masters in IT. I have made my statement voluntarily of
my own accord without any duress, pressure or coercion from any quarter
after understanding the implications of it. I do not need to think again.

RO & AC ANU MALHOTRA, J

15.09.2022.

Signature
Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:SUMIT GHAI
Signing
Date:20.09.2022
17:24:51
This file is
digitally signed by
PS to HMJ ANU
MALHOTRA.