05 Direct Time Study
05 Direct Time Study
Work sampling
observed time
work elements
performance rating
normal time
irregular elements
Timing Methods
• Continuous method
• Advantage: Clock never stops, no time
omitted
• Disadvantage: observer does not know at
the job how individual elements vary
• Snapback method
• Advantage: Observer can note individual
variability within an element and eliminate
subtraction
• Disadvantages: difficult to coordinate eye,
watch and task! Especially when operations
are short
Rate the worker’s performance
• Standard performance = 100%
• Rate
• Individual elements
• Or entire work cycle
• Most difficult & controversial
step in time study
• Requires analyst’s judgment
Rate the worker’s performance
• Westinghouse rating factor:
• One of the oldest used rating systems, then termed leveling, was developed
by Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
• This Westinghouse rating system considers four factors in evaluating the
performance of the operator: skill, effort, conditions, and consistency.
Apply allowance to normal time to
compute standard time (Tstd)
• to apply standard time for the task, PFD allowance is added to the
normal time
Tstd = TN * (1 + Apfd)
Apfd —> allowance factor for personal Bme, faBgue, and delays
➤ in case the task includes a machine cycles, the standard time may be
computed as
• overall,
• our objecYve is to find the value of sample size n that will saYsfy our specificaYon
of 𝜶 and interval size for the values of x and s.
• let’s say, if the interval size = x̄ ± k x̄, , where k is a proporYon of the specified
interval (e.g. 10% or 0.10), then we may have
How many sample/cycles?
• A time study analyst has collected 10 readings on a particular work element of
interest and would like to consider how many more cycles to time. Based on the
sample, the mean time for the element is 𝑥̅ = 0.40 min and the sample standard
deviation s = 0.07 min. At a 95% confidence level, how many cycles should be
timed to ensure the actual element time is within ± 10% of the mean?