SAMVAD Forensic Manual 2024-1
SAMVAD Forensic Manual 2024-1
SAMVAD
Support, Advocacy & Mental health interventions for children in Vulnerable circumstances And Distress
A National Initiative & Integrated Resource for Child Protection, Mental Health, & Psychosocial Care
Established by Ministry of Women & Child Development, Government of India
Located in Dept. of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry at National Institute of Mental Health &
Neurosciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore
Acknowledgements
At the outset, we would like to express our gratitude to the Hon’ble Minister of Women and Child Development,
Ms. Smriti Zubin Irani, for her vision and steadfast support, which has culminated in this unique initiative for
vulnerable children. Indeed, it is this vision and support from the Ministry of Women and Child Development,
Government of India, that has enabled SAMVAD to undertake the development of this manual, as part of its work
on child mental health, protection and psychosocial care.
We are grateful to the mental health professionals and child protection workers and paediatricians, who have
shared their experiences and challenges in working with issues of child sexual abuse, during the course of
SAMVAD’s training programs and tele-mentoring sessions. Indeed, these engagements stimulated much critical
discourse on child sexual abuse interventions, highlighting for us the myriad dilemmas and challenges that child
health service providers encounter in their practice. Likewise, we owe a debt of gratitude to the judicial officers
with whom we have worked, both in court, and in judicial education programs, and from whom we have gained
invaluable learning, about children’s interface with legal systems.
We acknowledge the contributions of other mental health professionals to this manual, namely, Dr Eesha Sharma,
Associate Professor, and Dr Harshini Manohar, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,
NIMHANS, for proof-reading and providing further inputs to this manual. We also express our deep gratitude to
Dr Joske Bunders-Aelen, Faculty, Athena Institute, Vrije University, Amsterdam, for guiding the transdisciplinary
thought that informed the conceptualization and content of this manual.
Finally, but most importantly, we are grateful to the many young children and adolescents, whom we have had the
privilege of assisting, through their experiences of adversity and abuse. This manual, as it should be, is as much
informed by their questions and concerns, their struggles and reflections, and processes of healing and recovery,
as by adult or stakeholder and service-provider perspectives. We therefore dedicate this manual to children
everywhere, to their safety and protection, and their journeys of hope and reclamation—all of which continually
propel us to develop more intensive, child-centric endeavours, to assist them as they traverse the long and
winding roads of justice, healing and recovery.
10. Other First Level Psychosocial & Mental Health Interventions 209
11. Long Term Interventions in Child Sexual Abuse (A): Towards 218
Healing & Recovery
12. Long Term Interventions in Child Sexual Abuse (B): and 240
Personal Safety Awareness and Education
The limited availability of mental health human resources and mental health care facilities, as well as their skewed
distribution contribute to unmet child mental health needs. These unmet needs, in general issues of adverse
childhood experiences and childhood trauma, in low middle income countries, such as India, play a major role in
the development of child mental health morbidities. However, the expertise and skills to provide treatment
interventions for childhood trauma are scarce, with few tertiary mental healthcare centres demonstrating the
capacity to assist children with such complex child mental health needs. Child sexual abuse (CSA) is one such
childhood trauma and an experience of adversity, which is being duly acknowledged as a protection and mental
health-related concern in children, due to increasing public awareness. However, the knowledge and skills to
address CSA, in both mental health and legal systems, especially the need to recognise the links between child
protection, trauma and mental health concerns, has not been commensurate with CSA awareness and reporting.
2
In the light of India’s relatively newly adopted CSA law, child mental health professionals have an increasingly
important role to play in child sexual abuse: like in other countries, they are increasingly being asked to assist legal
authorities, by way of assessment, provision of expert opinion and testimony to make dispositional
recommendations in CSA cases. This requires child mental health professionals to move beyond their routine
mandates of psychiatric interventions and treatment of affected children, to understanding not only the key
provisions of the Indian Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO), 2012 law but the many challenges
of its implementation, such as eliciting valid and reliable testimony from children and adolescents, especially very
young children, re-traumatisation of children through court inquiry, the dilemmas of preparation of child
witnesses for court proceedings as against the court’s concerns about tutoring.
Thus, and also since the child is typically the sole witness against the suspected abuser, successful prosecution is
heavily dependent on the child’s disclosure and narrative on the abuse experience. This is especially true when
there is no medical evidence available and the case rests on the word of the child as against that of the alleged
perpetrator. The challenges of obtaining child witness testimony are compounded by concerns of children’s age
and developmental (dis)abilities, as well as accuracy of memory, their credibility, and vulnerability to suggestibility.
One of the key systemic interventions required to mitigate the gaps in accessing justice is the strengthening of
evidence collection in CSA cases, by facilitating knowledge development amongst practitioners on the dynamics of
CSA perpetration, its varied impacts across key domains of child development, and crucially, its impact on the
child’s ability to contend with complex legal processes.
Keeping these considerations in mind, the development of child forensic skills, techniques and knowledge among
child care professionals and other stakeholders, working in varied capacities with children who have undergone
sexual abuse, will thus enable them to handle cases of sexual abuse in a manner that accommodates children’s
needs and capacities, consequently promoting efficiency in evidence gathering processes and minimising the
impact of secondary victimisation on children.
Child forensics in India, is in a nascent stage, despite the enormous imperative to develop standardised systematic
protocols in this area. It is in recognition of this that the proposed training manual has been developed, in
accordance with the above-described roles and functions that child mental health professionals are required to
undertake in child sexual abuse cases. The training program adopts a transdisciplinary approach to training and
capacity building, through a convergence between legal and child mental health domains. The integration of
knowledge from both domains allows for more comprehensive assistance and support to children, whose needs
for healing, well-being and justice need to be met by both mental health and legal systems. It is only though this
approach that the gains obtained through (clinical) treatment of the sexually abused child’s mental health issues
can be maintained—by ensuring that the mental health support initiated by healthcare services are continued
throughout the child’s interaction with the legal and judicial system, in ways that prevent re-traumatisation and
secondary victimisation that is known to occur within the latter systems.
The manual aims to enable child mental health professionals to bring transdisciplinary approaches to addressing
the complex medico-legal issues in child sexual abuse i.e. to integrate mental health and legal knowledge to
ensure comprehensive support and assistance for sexually abused children. The specific objectives of the manual
are to enable mental health service providers and other health professionals working with children to:
➢ Understand child sexual abuse dynamics and processes, in terms of their impact on:
3
For whom
With a view to enable mental health professionals to build their capacities in the area of child forensics, this
manual is ideally for use, both as a guide as well as for teaching purposes, by advanced level mental health
professionals. These would include psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers and paediatricians typically from
departments of psychiatry and paediatrics, and allied social sciences, located within secondary and tertiary
healthcare facilities.
The manual is particularly intended for tertiary healthcare facilities that serve as teaching hospitals, and implement
academic programs, in order that child sexual abuse work may be systematically taught to residents and post-
graduate students, during the course of their work and study.
Divided into 21 modules, the manual begins by locating child sexual abuse work in the context of the POCSO 2012
Act and moves on to modules that focus on mental health perspectives on child sexual abuse. Building on this
understanding, modules on court processes and psycho-legal assistance follow, enabling mental health
professionals to gradually shift from mono-disciplinary approaches in child sexual abuse to transdisciplinary ones,
by applying their knowledge and skills in a legal context.
The methods suggested in the manual combine inputs from conceptual frameworks on child development, child
sexual abuse and legal procedures, with practical skill training to enable participants to translate theory into
practice i.e., ‘learning by doing’. A plethora of creative, participatory pedagogies are used, to enable participants to
bring in their experiences and reflect on child and adolescent issues and methods for use in their work. Such
experiential methods range from video/film viewing to case study analysis and group discussions and role plays—
particularly in order to enable the translation of conceptual knowledge into skills for use in the field. Thus, each
4
module, of an average duration of 3 hours, reflect a combination of theory or conceptual framework and
practice—with a heavy emphasis on practical skill training activities.
Each module lists specific objectives and an optimum teaching time, to allow for presentation of conceptual
frameworks, and implementation of activities and discussions. Detailed descriptions of concepts, approaches and
frameworks are laid out i.e. what the facilitator may say on the subject; alongside these, activity boxes provide
instructions on the ‘do and learn’ aspects of the training. Each module is followed by a list of recommended
readings. Where possible, materials for the activities to be implemented in each module, are provided i.e. such as
cards, case studies etc. Links are provided to SAMVAD’s Life Skills Manuals and other materials, as relevant. Video
clips have been embedded in YouTube/Google Drive to enable easy access through the QR codes provided in the
manuals. Where full length (commercial) films are used, it is recommended that facilitators and users of the
manual procure them by buying DVDs or access them from common OTT platforms (such as Netflix/ Amazon
Prime or others).
While it is recommended that the manual be used in its entirety, by systematically running the sessions, in the order
in which they are presented, it may be used in parts with service providers, in accordance with their needs i.e.
individual, stand-alone sessions, focussing on any given aspect of child sexual abuse may also be conducted.
Towards this end, session-wise as well as complete training program schedules are provided in the annexes.
It may be noted that the activities and discussions outlined in the training series are essentials and guidelines; it is
at the discretion of the facilitator on how creatively to use these to enable the participants, to introduce context-
specific issues in accordance with the learning needs and work of the participants. Since the manual uses strongly
participatory approaches, the quality and the success of the learning is heavily dependent on the participants, and
the experiences and commitment that they bring with them to share.
While the recommended users of the manual may be paediatricians and mental health practitioners working in
secondary and tertiary care facilities, ultimately no one who is deeply interested in children and their predicaments,
can be excluded from its use! Thus, this manual is also for anyone who cares to work systematically with children’s
issues…one who continuously and intensively works in direct contact with children…who has a deep interest in
transdisciplinary and experiential methodologies…and is consequently, grounded in the field realities and
complexities of working with childhood adversities.
And so, the manual, a first of its kind in child forensics in the country, is for anyone who has a passion for children
and child work… who believes in advocating for protection and justice for children, but always with a view to
ensuring their mental health and well-being. We would love to hear from those using the manual, and in turn, to
use their experiences to always revise and refine our knowledge and pedagogies…for the essence of
transdisciplinary approaches, as warranted by child protection and mental health work in general, and child sexual
abuse interventions in particular, entails continuous co-production of knowledge, through integrating practical
perspectives that are scientific, sectoral and ever grounded in the field realities and praxis of child work.
You are welcome to contact us on info@nimhanschildprotect.in for assistance and support…we would also love for
you to share your experiences with us!
5
6
• To develop an overview of the main provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,
2012 (POCSO), Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (MTPA) and the Prohibition of Child Marriage
Act, 2006 (PCMA).
Time
3.5 Hours
Concept
Gender and Sexual Offences: Implications of POCSO
In order to understand the relevance of the enactment of the POCSO Act, it is imperative to first contextualise
previous statutory attempts at dealing with sexual offences (particularly with regard to children). Prior to POCSO,
the key provisions in the Indian Penal Code (IPC), dealing with sexual offences were, namely, sections 354, 375,
376, 377, and 509. In the context of child prostitution and child trafficking cases, IPC sections related to
kidnapping, slavery and forced labour were also applicable.
These sections were, however, severely limited in statutory scope and enforceability, given the complex realities of
child sexual abuse, first highlighted in the landmark Supreme Court judgement of Sudhesh Jhaku v. KC Jhaku
(1999), wherein Singh, J., quoting Legrand (1973), stated that men who are sexually assaulted should have the
same protection as female victims, and that women sexual assaulters should be as liable for conviction as
conventional (male) rapists. If rape were to be considered as a sexual assault, rather than a special crime against
women, rape law could be put in a healthier perspective and reduce the mythical elements that have
tended to make rape laws a means of reinforcing the status of women as sexual possessions.
The impetus for a separate statute to address the issue of child sexual abuse is examined in the light of the case of
Sakshi v. Union of India (1999 & 2004), the Law Commission of India 172nd Report and the results from the
findings of the ‘Study on Child abuse: India 2007’ undertaken by the Ministry of Women and Child
Development, Govt. of India.
The critical issue, therefore, was one of under-inclusion, which adversely affected the legal protections afforded to
all non-female victims (including male and transgender/transsexual victims). As has been highlighted in much of
the scholarship surrounding the issue, the fundamental error was inherent in the conception of the perpetrator-
victim relationship through the rubric of gender i.e., male perpetrators offending against female victims for
reasons limited to sexual proclivity and modesty/honour. What is interesting to note, in this regard, are the
continuing statutory deficiencies in the criminal provisions for rape under the IPC (which continue to be the sole
legal protections against sexual offences involving adult victims). Related to this primary issue were other critical
deficiencies, namely, the restricted statutory understanding of the spectrum of non-penetrative sexual offences
7
(including verbal harassment, non-penetrative sexual contact, stalking, pornography etc.), and indeed, the
definition of penetration itself (i.e., whether it was inclusive of non-penile penetration).
These developments culminated in the need for a child abuse legislation that avoided the previous problems of
under-inclusion, through gender-neutral provisions on sexual offences, to cover both perpetrators and victims
who did not fit the male-female binary. This is a critical advancement of the POCSO Act, 2012 in the context of
child sexual abuse (despite the existing limitations for sexual offences against adult victims). However, despite the
progress made under the POCSO framework, gender biases continue to play a role in the implementation of the
POCSO Act, wherein multiple instances of police refusal to register an FIR have been noted, because of the
prevailing notion that “other genders can’t be sexually abused”.
As the POCSO Act set out to provide as comprehensive a framework as possible to cover the gambit of sexual
offences against children, all offence categories are exclusive of each other (i.e., no overlap in scope) and classified
in a sliding scale of punitive sanctions (with enhanced punishments for ‘aggravated’ forms of penetrative and
sexual assault). The key ingredients of each offence category are stipulated below:
i) Penetrative Sexual Assault: The key requirement for application of this offence category is any form of
penetrative sexual abuse. This extends to penile and non-penile penetration (object penetration). In terms of the
scope of this offence category, the definition of penetration extends to any orifice of the child’s body i.e., oral,
anal, and vaginal penetration.
8
ii) Sexual Assault: The requirement for this category is any form of sexual contact that is non-penetrative.
While this includes genital contact, it also extends to non-genital contact with ‘sexual intent’. This can include
inappropriate touching that does not include contact with the child’s genitalia, but is demonstrably carried out
with sexual intent. Admittedly, in cases of non-genital contact, the question of whether the contact was pursued
with sexual intent, would depend on the facts and circumstances of the case.
iii) Sexual Harassment: This next offence category deals with non-contact sexual offences, including ‘words,
sounds, or gestures’; any form of exhibition (of a body part/object); inducing a child to exhibit any body part;
showing/threatening to use a depiction of the child’s body/soliciting for child pornography; physical or virtual
stalking. The question of sexual intent is critical here and will depend on the facts and circumstances of the case.
iv) Child Pornography: This category of offences relates to making, storing or transmitting child pornography
in any manner. The following will constitute pornographic representation:
Aggravated Offences
Keeping in mind that most child sexual abuse is perpetrated through known
perpetrators (including those in a position of trust and responsibility), the abuse
can have severe mental health consequences for the child even in cases where the
nature of abuse is non-penetrative. Therefore, the Act stipulates circumstances in
which the sexual abuse is considered aggravated, and consequently, subject to
higher punitive sanctions. The circumstances that determine whether the
penetrative sexual assault/sexual assault is of an aggravated nature depend on the
following three questions:
2. Who was the victim? (eg: mentally/physically disabled children, children below 12 years)
3. What was the nature of the offence? What were the consequences? (eg: sexual assault committed in a
group, use of deadly weapons, sexual assault causing serious bodily harm, causing temporary/long term
disability, infecting child with HIV, causing pregnancy, committing offence more than once etc.)
Note: If ANY of the three questions are satisfied, the assault would constitute aggravated assault under the
POCSO Act, 2012.
9
Method: Discussion
Material: See Image 1 showing the child in a public park with an older male (Ramo Bhaiyya) who has exposed
his genitals to the child.
Process:
Discussion:
• Discuss the ways in which children may not have the language to describe sexual abuse therefore
resorting to pictorial depictions and words such as “pee-pee”, “snake” and “banana”, to explain the
mechanics of the sexual abuse.
• Discuss applicability of relevant legal provisions under the POCSO Act.
Mandatory Reporting
Under the POCSO framework, any person who believes that a sexual offence against a child may be committed, or
knows that it has been committed, or is likely to be committed has to report the matter. Organizations may also
report cases of child sexual abuse through the relevant nodal functionary. In this regard, a POCSO case must be
reported to the Special Juvenile Police Unit (specifically the Child Welfare Police Officer), or alternatively, any
police officer so that an FIR can be registered. This will trigger the subsequent legal processes, which includes
sharing of information of the report, by the police, to the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) and the Special Court, in
addition to the medico-legal examination of the child, and placement of the child in a child care institution (if
necessary).
In the case of organisations, the in-charge has a special obligation to report information pertaining to the
subordinate, failing which, a higher penalty is attracted i.e., imprisonment for up to a year.
Once the Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU) or any police officer is informed of the incidence of child sexual abuse,
the investigation and legal procedures commence.
A flowchart of the trial procedure is given herein in order to understand the rigours of the criminal justice
system.
10
It is important to identify the key stakeholders within the POCSO Regime in order to understand their roles and
responsibilities in ensuring a child-oriented process for victims of CSA. Coordinated concerted efforts of all
stakeholders is essential to support a child victim, right from reporting until the Court has pronounced a verdict.
Figure 2. Key Stakeholders in the POCSO Regime
11
Complainant/Informant: Any person giving information, which leads to lodging of the report by the police
officer is the informant, and the person who files the complaint is the complainant. Such persons may also be
vulnerable witnesses and could be eligible for protection based on the facts of the case. Their support and
testimony may also be instrumental to the legal proceedings.
Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU)/Police: Section 2 (55), JJ Act, 2015 states that SJPU means a unit of the
police force of a district or city or, as the case may be, any other police unit like railway police, dealing with
children and designated as such for handling children. With respect to the setting up of the SJPU the JJ Act, 2015
says that every police station shall have at least one officer, not below the rank of Assistant Sub-Inspector,
designated as the Child Welfare Police Officer (CWPO) to exclusively deal with children either as victims or
perpetrators. The State Government shall constitute SJPU in each district and city, headed by a police officer not
below the rank of a Deputy Superintendent of Police or above. It shall consist of all CWPOs, two Social Workers
having experience of working in the field of child welfare, of whom one will be a woman. SJPU will also be
constituted for the Railway Protection Force (RPF) or Government Railway Police (GRP) at every railway station as
per requirement. Where a SJPU cannot be set up, at least one RPF or GRP Officer will be designated as the CWPO.
The SJPU is tasked to coordinate all functions of police related to children. In the case of CNCP, SJPU will
coordinate with the Social Workers and produce before the CWC. The SJPU will also coordinate with specialised
service providers like doctors, paramedics, special educators, counsellors and Childline for immediate support to
children. Section 19 of the POCSO Act, 2012 states that any information regarding an incidence of child sexual
abuse has to be reported to the SJPU or the Police.
Child Welfare Committee (CWC): A CWC is a body notified and constituted under Section 27 of the JJ Act, 2015
for every district for exercising the powers and to discharge the duties conferred on such Committees in relation
to children in need of care and protection under this Act. The CWC usually sends the child to a Children’s Home
while the inquiry into the case is conducted for the protection of the child. The CWC meets and interviews the
child to learn his/her background information and also understand the problem the child is facing. The probation
officer (PO) in charge of the case must also submit regular reports of the case. The purpose of the CWC is to
determine the best interest of the child and find the child a safe home and environment either with his/her
biological parents or adoptive parents, foster care or in an institution.
Medical Professionals: The POCSO Act, 2012 read with the corresponding rules clearly define the role and
responsibilities of medical practitioners in the form of mandatory reporting, medical examination, treatment of
injuries, prophylaxis for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and HIV, emergency contraception and referral to
mental healthcare. Medical professionals play a dual role in responding to victims of CSA. The first is to provide
the necessary medical treatment and psychological support. The second is to assist the children in their medico-
legal proceedings by collecting evidence and ensuring proper documentation for effective legal processes.
Support Person: A person assigned by the Child Welfare Committee, in accordance with sub-rule (7) of rule 4, to
render assistance to the child through the process of investigation and trial, or any other person assisting the child
in the pre-trial or trial process in respect of an offence under the POCSO Act. The Supreme Court has also ruled
that the State has an obligation to provide Support Persons to POCSO victims and this cannot be made optional.
Unless there are good reasons recorded by the CWC in its order, the appointment of Support Persons is
mandatory.
Child Care Institute (CCI): The JJ Act, 2015 provides for the setting up of institutional care structures for children.
The types of CCIs:
12
Magistrate: A Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate may record a voluntary statement of the child /
de-facto complainant under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 164 CrPC Statement may be taken
anywhere from a few weeks after the recording of the initial complaint to a month or two months. Given that this
might be one of the first formal settings in which a child is required to recount their experiences, precautions must
be taken to prevent retraumatization. The Procedure for recording the statement of child victim is contemplated
under section 164(5) Cr.P.C., Section 25, 26 of POCSO Act, 2012 and Rule 11 of The Criminal Rules of Practice 2019.
Translator/Interpreter/Special Educator: The POCSO Rules, 2020 state that children who have suffered sexual
abuse are entitled to the appointment of a translator or interpreter. Furthermore, to have a special educator for
the child or other specialized person where the child is disabled is also an entitlement in POCSO cases. This is to
ensure that the child may participate fully in the process and is not put through further hardship due to difficulty
in language, communication or differential abilities. As per the provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012, the assistance
of a Translator / Interpreter / Special Educator can be taken from the very first legal process be it with the police or
at the time of recording the 164 CrPC statement before the Magistrate up to giving witness testimony before the
Special Court, as well. In each district, the District Child Protection Unit shall maintain a register with names,
addresses and other contact details of interpreters, translators, experts, special educators and support persons for
the purposes of the Act, and this register shall be made available to the SJPU, local police, magistrate or Special
Court, as and when required.
Special Court Judge: The POCSO Act 2012 provides for establishment of Special Courts for the purpose of
ensuring speedy trial. Since 2019, a Centrally Sponsored Scheme, has enabled the setting up of Fast Track Special
Courts (FTSCs) including 389 exclusive POCSO Courts across the nation for expeditious trials relating to sexual
offences. Given that the trial safeguards under the POCSO Act are child-oriented, Special Court judges also are
tasked with ensuring these processes are followed.
Special Public Prosecutor: The Special Public Prosecutors are appointed by the state government under Section
32 of the POCSO Act to prosecute offences committed under the Act. As envisioned by the POCSO Act, 2012 and
the JJ Act, 2015, the duty of the public prosecutor is not confined to prosecution, but to ensure justice to the
victims also. Therefore, any concerns of the child when it comes to the Trial or cooperation with providing the best
evidence to the Court is done with coordination of the Special Public Prosecutors and the various stakeholders.
Juvenile Justice Board/Children’s Court: In cases where the alleged perpetrator is a child in conflict with the law
(CICL), then the forum of adjudication will be either the juvenile justice board (JJB) or the Children’s Court, set up
under the JJ Act, 2015. For children under the age of 16, the JJB may take appropriate measures. The Children’s
Court may take appropriate measures in cases where a juvenile aged between 16-18 is transferred by the JJB to be
tried as an adult, after a preliminary assessment.
Experts: The Judge is not expected to be an expert in all fields, especially, where the subject matters involve
technical or specialized knowledge or experience in the subject matter. The Indian Law of Evidence allows an
opinion of any person other than the judge as to the existence of the facts in issue or facts that are relevant to a
matter, which resultantly, presented before the court of law in the form of ‘expert evidence’. Section 45 of the
Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that an ‘expert’ means a person who has special knowledge, skill or experience
13
either in foreign law, science, art, handwriting, or finger impression and such knowledge has been gathered by him
either by practice, observation or proper studies. The POCSO Rules, 2020 state that, an “expert” means a person
trained in mental health, medicine, child development or other relevant discipline, who may be required to
facilitate communication with a child whose ability to communicate has been affected by trauma, disability or any
other vulnerability. Therefore, medical professionals including psychiatrists, counsellors, psychiatric social workers,
paediatricians, gynaecologists may assist the Court in POCSO proceedings given their specialised knowledge and
professional qualification in relation to children.
With respect to recording of the child’s statement by the concerned police personnel (Section 161 Statement) or
the Magistrate (Section 164 Statement), the following are critical safeguards that have been instituted to mitigate
the possibility of secondary traumatisation and facilitate a ‘child-friendly’ procedure:
• A child’s statement should be recorded at their home, or a place where he usually stays, or a place which
the child chooses. The child cannot be detained in a police station in any situation.
• The Child should not come in contact with accused or accused’s lawyer during statement recording by
Police/Magistrate.
• Should preferably be recorded by a woman police officer not below the rank of sub-inspector. The
Police should not be in uniform when the statement is recorded.
• It should be recorded in the presence of a parent, guardian, or any person whom the child trusts.
In certain cases, concerning children with temporary or permanent mental/physical disability, wherein it is not
possible to elicit the child’s oral testimony, there are certain procedural relaxations that have been introduced to
reduce the number of trial appearances for the child.
Section 164 (5A) (b) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) prescribes that the child’s S.164 statement can be
taken as the examination-in-chief during the trial. Therefore, in cases of severe trauma and risk of secondary
traumatisation, a child may not be required to provide testimony in court, keeping in mind that mental illness is
also statutorily recognised as a disability. There is a caveat to this, however. Child witnesses may still be required
to appear in Court for their cross-examination, as this is recognised as an inalienable part of the accused’s right to
a fair trial. (Rahul v. State of Maharashtra (2018))
Some of the key provisions of POCSO relating to medical examination of the child are as follows:
• Emergency medical care must be provided within 24 hours of reporting to the police. There is NO
requirement for legal documentation prior to medical examination.
• The examination is required to be conducted in the presence of a parent/guardian/or any person who the
child trusts.
14
• A registered medical practitioner must conduct a medical examination within 24 hours of receiving
information of the case. This applies to all hospitals irrespective of whether they are government-run or
private.
• If the victim is a girl child, the examination should be done by a female doctor, or in the presence of a
woman. Subject to the medical tests, options under the MTPA Act need to be discussed with the child and
their guardian in the event of a pregnancy.
• The child’s health needs are to be attended by the concerned medical practitioner including treatment for
physical injuries, exposure to STDs, referral for de-addiction/mental health services.
Furthermore, there are certain procedural safeguards that must be followed during the course of medical
examinations, keeping in mind the possibility of re-traumatisation of the child owing to the invasive nature of the
procedures. These safeguards are to be followed in all cases of sexual offences, as stipulated in the ‘Guidelines &
Protocols on Medico-legal care for survivors/victims of Sexual Violence’ released by the Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare, Government of India. In this regard, the Bombay High Court recently made scathing observations
of the ‘degrading’ and ‘unscientific’ two-finger test performed at the largest Maharashtra State-Run Hospital on
one of the survivors from the 2013 Shakti Mill Gang Rape Case, despite clear directions of the Supreme Court on
the subject.
The Court noted that such unscientific medical procedures constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. It
was also observed that the practise was continued in a reputable medical institution despite the existence of
State-level Guidelines.
The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 regulates the procedure and approvals required for abortions in
India and the qualifications required for Registered Medical Practitioners (RMPs). MTPA was also amended in 2021
to incorporate some critical changes to the law.
As it stands, the following is an overview of important provisions relevant to children and pregnancies resulting
from the rape of children:
▪ Any woman under the age of 18 needs permission from her guardian for termination of pregnancy.
▪ Pregnancy may be terminated if RMP is of the opinion that continuance of pregnancy poses a risk to
mental/physical health of pregnant woman. Anguish after pregnancies resulting from rape constitutes
grave injury to mental health of pregnant woman.
▪ For termination of pregnancies under 20 weeks, opinion of 1 RMP is required. For pregnancies between 20-
24 weeks, the opinion of 2 RMPs is required.
▪ Pregnancies after 24 weeks can be terminated only if the State’s Medical Board diagnoses ‘substantial foetal
abnormalities’.
While the MTPA is clear on the 24-week period for termination of pregnancies, even in case of child sexual abuse
(notwithstanding substantial foetal abnormalities), the 2021 case of Kumari V v. State of Karnataka and Ors. is
significant, wherein the Karnataka High Court permitted a 16-year-old child victim of rape to medically terminate
her pregnancy which crossed the 24-week period, while exercising the Court’s constitutional powers under Article
15
226 and upholding her right to reproductive choice as an intrinsic part of her Right to Life under Article 21 of the
Constitution of India. Therefore, despite the statutory limitation, the High Courts can nonetheless intervene in
exceptional circumstances.
The Supreme Court in the case of X v. The Principal Secretary (2023) deliberated on the conflict between the
statutory obligation of mandatory reporting and the rights of privacy and reproductive autonomy of the minor
under Article 21 (Fundamental Right to Life) of the Constitution.
“We cannot disregard the truth that such activity (consensual sexual activity between adolescents) continues to
take place and sometimes leads to consequences such as pregnancy. The legislature was no doubt alive to this
fact when it included adolescents within the ambit of the MTP Rules….”
The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, makes child marriages voidable and makes the parties to a child
marriage (other than the child) punishable for an offence under the said Act.
"Child marriage" means a marriage to which either of the contracting parties is a child.
"Child" means a person who, if a male, has not completed twenty-one years of age, and if a female, has not
completed eighteen years of age. There is a difference in age by definition under the POCSO Act, 2012 and the
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. The child may file before the appropriate District Court/Family Court to
declare the marriage null and void at any time; even after attaining majority but within two years of attaining
majority. Children born from such a marriage are legitimate and enjoy all rights of maintenance, inheritance etc.
In the case of Independent Thought v. Union of India and Another (2017), the Court articulated for the first
time the government’s constitutional and human rights obligation to address child marriage and respect the rights
of married girls.
“There can be no doubt that if a girl child is forced by her husband into sexual intercourse against her will or without
her consent, it would amount to a violation of her human right to liberty or dignity guaranteed by the Constitution.”
The provisions of the POCSO Act, 2012 as well as provisions under the Indian Penal Code will apply to wives who
are under 18 years of age.
The POCSO Act and Rules provide for appointment of support persons to assist the child during investigation of
the case (pre-trial) and during witness-testimony by the child (trial). The support person has to inform the child
and the child’s guardian about the status of the case, next date of hearing, etc. The support person must maintain
confidentiality. Additionally, the support person is required to help the child understand court procedures and
what is expected of the child in this context. This is a critical aspect of facilitating child-friendly proceedings and
mitigating the possibility of re-traumatisation in the adversarial courtroom as children do not understand the law
or why they are required to give testimony etc. The child may also have fears regarding the accused harming the
child.
16
Victim Compensation
An important aspect of current criminal law jurisprudence is the provision made for award of compensation for
victims of sexual offences. Statutory provisions, in this regard, exist for providing compensation to victims under
the CrPC and the POCSO Rules. Rule 9 lays down a list of circumstantial and consequential factors that must guide
the award of compensation under POCSO. These factors typically relate to the nature and severity of the offence,
with minimum and maximum compensation specified for each category.
The National Legal Services Authority, in furtherance of the Supreme Court’s directives in the Nipun Saxena case,
prepared the 2018 Compensation Scheme providing for rehabilitation and compensation of victims of sexual
offences. Typically, in matters of compensation, the District Legal Service Authorities play a critical role in assisting
child victims and their families seek compensation. The Special Court may on its own or through an application,
pass an order for interim compensation for relief or rehabilitation at any stage after registration of the First
Information Report. (FIR) Therefore, while child victims do not have to wait for the conclusion of the case to
receive interim compensation.
However, despite the provisions for compensation, Courts have reported difficulties in providing timely interim
compensation owing to the difficulties in assessing the circumstances of the case and deciding the quantum of
compensation. In this regard, an interesting example of possible ways forward is the recent Delhi High Court
decision in Umesh v. State (and other connected matters) wherein, owing to multiple instances of delayed
compensation, the High Court took key steps to streamline the process of compensation. It was directed that:
i. Delhi Police would provide a digital record of FIRs (from 2018 till the date of the judgement) to the Delhi
State Legal Services Authority. Details of 87,000 FIRs were provided to SLSA to cross reference cases wherein
compensation was not provided.
ii. Additionally, it was directed that when provisions pertaining to sexual offences are added to the FIR at a
later stage, a copy is also to be sent to SLSA.
17
Method:
Case Study
Material: Case Studies (2 case studies are available under ‘Additional Material’ at the the end of this
module)
Process:
Present each case study (one by one) and request participants to reflect on them.
As discussed earlier, the statutory age of consent is 18, leaving any and all sexual engagements under the age of
18 statutory sexual assault. As a result of the same, seeing as there are currently no legislative exemptions to the
prescribed age of consent, all mutually consenting adolescent sexual engagements necessarily fall under the
purview of POCSO. However, keeping in mind the object of the Act i.e., to prevent and penalise child sexual abuse,
the issue of the statutory validity of POCSO’s provisions penalising mutually consenting relationships between
adolescents has received significant attention.
In this regard, it is significant to also note observations made in recent POCSO cases by the Hon’ble High Courts:
• Vijayalakshmi & Anr. v. State & Anr. – “Punishing an adolescent boy who enters into a relationship with
a minor girl by treating him as an offender, was never the objective of the POCSO Act”.
18
• Sabari v. Inspector of Police – The High Court observed that there is a necessity to amend the definition
of “Child” under POCSO i.e., lower the age to 16 (thereby lowering the age of sexual consent), with the caveat that
the adult partner cannot be significantly older than the 16 y/o, i.e., more than 5 years older.
Method:
Discussion
Process:
• What are your thoughts on some statutory age of consent and its utility in addressing child sexual
abuse?
• Keeping in mind the protection imperative of POCSO, what are your thoughts on exceptions to
the minimum age of consent? Could this result in lesser prosecutions of incidents of child sexual
abuse?
• If you’re in favour of lowering the age of consent, what do you think should be the minimum age
of consent? Should there then be statutory specifications pertaining to the age difference in a
mutually consenting relationship?
• In the case of runaways, what might be suitable interventions to address such behaviour?
Discussion:
• Elicit participant perspectives on the current age of sexual consent/majority under the POCSO Act
and possible consequences of the same for adolescents in mutually consenting relationships.
• Discuss the previous case studies and explore possible positive/negative consequences on the
enforceability of the Act, as a result of the minimum age of consent
• It is also pertinent here to discuss the perpetrator -victim dynamic here through a gender lens,
keeping in mind the nature of POCSO complaints in mutually consenting relationships.
Keeping in mind the discussion undertaken on the subject of mutually consenting relationships, it is significant to
consider two more cases on the subject of capacity for sexual decision-making:
• Virender Singh v. State of H.P: "The boy is aged 24 years, whereas the girl is aged 16. Even though the age
gap between them is enormous, this is probably because of social background. Families arrange marriages in the
Indian social setup. In such arrangements, mostly, the bride is younger than the groom, sometimes with a
considerable age gap…Such social settings might be a catalyst for a girl to fall in love with a more senior boy. Even
otherwise, it is not unusual that a girl aged 16 years of age falls in love with a boy aged 24 years or vice versa.”
• Shoukat Hussian and another v. State of Punjab and others: Punjab & Haryana High Court, last year,
granted protection to a Muslim Girl (17-Year-Old) who married a Muslim Man (36-Year-Old) while noting that both
are of Marriageable Age under Personal Law.
19
"The Court cannot shut its eyes to the fact that the apprehension of the petitioners needs to be addressed. Merely
because the petitioners have got married against the wishes of their family members, they cannot possibly be deprived
of the fundamental rights as envisaged in the Constitution of India."
As is observable in these two cases, there is a significant age gap between the parties, thereby raising two
interrelated and significant questions which will be explored in the next module: i) Does the adolescent have the
capacity to consent to sexual activity; ii) Does a significant age difference raise concerns about grooming of the
adolescent, thereby making it imperative for there to be a more comprehensive assessment before considering the
possibility of a settlement (in light of the facts and circumstances of the case)?
These questions will be discussed at length in the ‘ABCs of Child Sexual Abuse: Dynamics of Abuse’.
20
Suggested Readings
Additional Materials
Image 1 (‘Me and Ramo Bhaiyya’): For Activity ‘Me and Ramo Bhaiyya’
Case Study 1:
Kushal, a 17-year-old boy, raped a 4-year-old child who lived near the garage in which he worked as a mechanic.
The child was found injured in a nearby abandoned building with bloody clothes by one of her neighbours in the
night. There were empty bottles of alcohol present nearby. She was admitted at a hospital and is recovering from
her injuries. Kushal’s father is employed as a security guard and is usually not home. His mother left the home
when he was 10 years old and he has not heard from her since then. Kushal has never been to school and has
worked odd jobs here and there till he found work at the garage 4 years ago. He hangs out with his friends from
the garage who also work as mechanics there. They are 2-3 years older than him. The other boys at the garage
started showing Kushal pornographic videos a few months ago after work, when they usually got drunk together.
His friends used to make fun of him and often said, “You can’t be a real man until you’ve experienced sex.’’
Case Study 2:
Karthik is a 17-year-old boy. After completing the 10th standard, he started working at a garage. He was in a
mutually consenting, romantic relationship with a 16-year-old girl who lived in his neighbourhood. However, the
families of Karthik and the girl opposed the relationship. Fearing that they would be separated, Karthik and the girl
decided to run away to another town and got married in a temple and lived together for 6 months. During this
time, Karthik was employed to do odd jobs as a handyman in someone’s estate. The parents of the girl lodged a
police complaint and when Karthik and the girl were found, an FIR was registered against Karthik under the
relevant provisions of the IPC for kidnapping and Section 3 (penetrative sexual assault) of the POCSO Act. As the
girl was found to be pregnant, Karthik was charged under Section 5 (aggravated penetrative sexual assault) of the
Act as well.
22
• To identify child and adolescent mental health problems that may result from trauma experiences.
Time
3.5 Hours
Concept
In as long as we learn about trauma as a theoretical concept, we will never really know how children experience it.
So, let us begin by doing an exercise to deeply understand the meaning and experience of childhood trauma.
(See Box for Activity 1…do this first!).
What is trauma?
Trauma is the emotional, psychological and physiological residue left over from heightened stress that
accompanies experience of threat, violence and life changing events. It is a more overwhelming event than a
person would ordinarily be expected to encounter.
Complex trauma
Children's exposure to multiple traumatic events
Often of an invasive, interpersonal nature
Wide-ranging, long-term effects due to this exposure.
*Children in Adverse Circumstances (ACES)
Types of Trauma
Trauma may occur in different contexts, that range from loss, grief, violence and abuse to natural disaster or war; it
may be caused by accident, wherein disfigurement and loss of limb may be additional traumatic events. Death,
dying, bereavement and other experiences of loss comprise traumatic experiences, as do physical and difficult
sexual experiences. Violence, exploitation, gender, patriarchy, trafficking also make the context for traumatic
experiences.
The difference between trauma and other difficult experiences is that traumatic events are usually out of the
ordinary, and extreme in nature, such as those described above. They are times when individuals feel ill-equipped
to cope i.e. their normal coping mechanisms, mainly resilience, family and social supports, are either dysfunctional
23
or inadequate in helping them address their problems. Traumatic events also have adverse long-term impacts on
individual psyche, their inter-personal relationships, and interactions with the world. Thus, what characterizes a
traumatic event is one or more of the following features:
• Acts of commission (things caregivers should not do to children but do them instead): Involve actual
trauma directed toward the child. These acts (of abuse), whether physical, sexual, or psychological, can
produce longstanding interpersonal difficulties, as well as distorted thinking patterns, emotional
disturbance, and posttraumatic stress.
Process:
Ask participants to do the following, step by step:
Note: In case the activity is being conducted online, participants may be encouraged (on a voluntary
basis) to share their art on camera and request other participants to ‘guess’ what the event may have
been; or participants may use their art work.
Discussion:
Explain:
➢ How it is difficult to recall and recount trauma narratives, even for adults—because of the painful
and anxiety-provoking emotions that they bring back to us, even years after the event occurred.
➢ How images of trauma are first coded into memory as images, sights, sounds, smells and
tastes…not as narratives. This is a distinguishing feature of traumatic memories—they are first
stored as sensory memories, often in fragments. These sensory experiences then get converted into
language, and emerge as narratives i.e. provided that the person has the developmental abilities for
this. In other words, for very young children, who do not as yet have language and verbal abilities,
or are still developing these abilities, it may be difficult to expect that this conversion process has
taken place. This is why young children have a sensory but not a narrative memory of what they
experienced—and consequently, struggle to ‘tell what happened’ as is expected of them.
25
➢ For older children or adults, who may convert these sensory memories into narratives, that may or
may not gain some coherence over time, and take the form of a personal narrative. However, the
trauma experience may still continue to return (especially if unresolved/ untreated), as sensory
perceptions and as affective states.
➢ The body keeps a physical memory of all of our experiences i.e. trauma impacts manifest not only
as psychological, but also as physiological symptoms. For example, frequent headaches and
stomach aches, blackouts and fainting fits or sweating and faster heartbeat when difficult events
are recalled are physiological manifestations of trauma—mainly relating to the anxiety
experienced by the person recalling the event. The need to avoid these uncomfortable sensations
and feelings are also reasons why people, including children, wish to avoid recounting trauma
narratives.
➢ Trauma does not just go away (time is not always a great healer!). A traumatic event cannot be
forgotten and the memory of it may remain lifelong.
➢ But it can be processed so that a child is able to understand and make sense of the experience, to
take perspective on what happened in such a way that he/she is able to lead a relatively happy
and productive life thereafter.
➢ Unresolved trauma will affect the way children think, what they believe, how they view themselves
and the world around them and consequently, their decisions and actions, both in the present and
in the future (when they become adults). Given that they sense of routine, equilibrium and
predictability is impacted, in the immediate time, children’s academic performance, their family
and social lives and relationships are likely to be adversely affected. In the future, children who are
sexually abused may grow into adolescents having difficulty with decision-making in sexual, as
well as high-risk behaviour contexts. As adults, they may develop fears relating to men/ women,
in accordance with the gender of the perpetrator, or make decisions against intimate-partner
relationships. Therefore, identifying and addressing trauma in children is a critical are of child
mental health work.
The nature and extent to which children are affected by trauma experiences vary from child to child, and is
dependent on various factors such as:
• The child's developmental stage--how the child internalizes and processes the traumatic event depends on
socio-emotional and cognitive abilities that are age and development-related. For example, how a five-
year old understands and experiences sexual abuse would be very different from how a 15-year-old would
do so, thus having differential emotional and behavioural impacts.
• The child's support system--which refers to availability and relationship with family or a healthy attachment
figure, and other social networks, including their responses. For example, the impact of sexual abuse on a
child from an intact family, who are loving and supportive of the child is likely to be very different from that
of a child from a family where disclosure is discouraged, the child is disbelieved or even blamed; and
different also from a child who resides in a child care institution and has little or no family and social
support.
That said, (unresolved) trauma can profoundly change the way in which children view themselves, the world and
other people (i.e. their relationships), both in the present and in the future, when they become adults. Trauma
causes changes in psychobiology as well as cognitive and affective responses. There are, as described below, a
number of typical ways in which children respond to experiences of childhood trauma.
27
27
28
28
29
• In addition to PTSD features of intrusion, avoidance, • Trauma has the potential to alter brain function and brain
sense of threat, those with complex PTSD experience structure.
high levels of affective dysregulation, dissociation, • Changes in brain functioning maintained for a long time after
negative self-concept and interpersonal disturbance, trauma ends, so trauma symptoms may be maintained.
due to multiple traumatic experiences. • Stress can change neurotransmitter and hormonal activity in the
brain and other parts of the body…to produce physiological
responses such as increased heart rate, perspiration…leading to
hypervigilance/high alertness.
• Early childhood history of abuse and maltreatment impacts brain
development and cognitive capacities.
*Like new neurobiological connections emerge after trauma
experiences, new responses can be learned to compete with fear
responses.
*Therapeutic responses can help re-regulate children’s
emotional/behavioural/cognitive functioning and minimize adverse
impacts of trauma on brain and body.
29
30
Pre-Schoolers…
• Become passive, quiet, and easily alarmed.
• Become fearful, especially regarding separations and new situations.
• Experience confusion about assessing threat and finding protection, especially in cases
where a parent or caretaker is the aggressor.
• Regress to recent behaviours (e.g., baby talk, bed-wetting, crying).
• Experience strong startle reactions, night terrors, or aggressive outbursts.
Adolescents…
• Have anxiety, fearfulness and depression
• Engage in Self-harm behaviours
• May show Aggressive or disruptive behaviour
• Suffer Sleep disturbances masked by late night studying, television watching, or partying
• Use high risk behaviours (pertaining to substance and sexuality or truancy and runaway
behaviours), as coping mechanisms to deal with stress
• Have expectations of maltreatment or abandonment
• Have increased risk of re-victimization, especially if the adolescent has lived with chronic
or complex trauma
30
31
The response to stress can often manifest in physical/somatic symptoms, such as aches and pains. As stress is
often associated with heightened levels of anxiety, this may also manifest in symptoms of physiological arousal,
such as sweating, palpitations, breathing difficulties. Thus, when children have medically unexplained somatic
symptoms/ complaints, one must keep in mind that these may be stress related. One source of stress, particularly
traumatic stress, is child sexual abuse. Furthermore, if the abuse involves contact and/or penetration, then there
may be other medical indicators such as injuries, and urinary tract infection.
Trauma-induced changes to the brain, especially if traumatic events occur in early childhood, can result in varying
degrees of cognitive impairment that can lead to difficulties with attention and focus and learning disabilities.
31
32
Poor cognitive-emotional interactions lead to poor mental health outcomes. There are critical interfaces between
maltreatment, stress/ anxiety symptoms, cognitive functioning or information processing and behavioural
decision-making. Some specific areas in which children’s cognition is impacted is described below.
• “I must be basically unacceptable/ bad”; “something must be basically wrong with me to deserve such
punishment”.
• Consequently, the child perceives herself as weak and inadequate.
• Child also views others as dangerous or rejecting or hurtful.
Negative assumptions refer to how the child makes inferences based on how she is treated. Example: a young
child who has been maltreated (physically or sexually abused) often infers a negative sense of the self from such
acts—“I must be basically unacceptable/ bad”; “something must be basically wrong with me to deserve such
punishment”. Consequently, the child perceives herself as weak and inadequate. Additionally, the child develops a
general mistrust of the world at large and thus views others as dangerous or rejecting or hurtful. Such perceptions
of the self, result in anxiety and guilt, while perceptions of others result in anxiety and/or aggressive behaviours.
• Re-experiencing trauma at a later time (weeks, months or even years after)—as flash backs.
• Children remember the details of event, especially sights and sounds.
• Thoughts can be triggered or ‘switched on’ by exposure to some environmental stimuli or experience that
is similar to the trauma.
A trigger is a stimulus that sets off a memory of a trauma or a specific portion of a traumatic experience.
(Thoughts can be triggered or ‘switched on’ by exposure to some environmental stimuli or experience that is
similar to the trauma). A flashback refers to re-experiencing a previous traumatic experience as if it were actually
happening in that moment.
For example, a person who was sexually abused by her uncle, year later and well into her adulthood, would feel
huge stress and anxiety and recall her sexual abuse trauma, whenever she saw a man with white shoes; her uncle
always wore white shoes, which was the first thing she saw when he appeared near her room each night. Thus, her
body had encoded the memory of white shoes in association with the trauma so that years later, it served as a
trigger for her anxiety, and she re-experienced the traumatic experience of sexual abuse when she saw a man
wearing white shoes.
Another example may be of how children who have lived in areas of armed conflict and been exposed to shooting
and gun fire, when moved to a place of safety (such as a refugee camp) still feel a sense of anxiety and panic when
they hear see smoke or hear loud noises—because these trigger memories of the conflict and the traumatic
experiences of violence and death they suffered at the time.
32
33
The fundamental assertion of worldview-based models of post-traumatic stress disorder is that trauma symptoms
result when traumatic experiences cannot be readily assimilated into previously held worldviews. Traumatic
experiences can affect the individual's basic beliefs about the world as a predictable and safe place. This is why
cornerstones in recovery from trauma include re-establishment of safety, connectedness, and the shattered
schema of a worldview.
Dissociative disorders usually develop as a way to cope with trauma. The disorders most often form in children
subjected to long-term physical, sexual or emotional abuse or, less often, a home environment that's frightening
or highly unpredictable. When children dissociate, they mentally block off thoughts, feelings, or memories about
the traumatic experience. Below are some indicators of dissociation in children (drawn from Putnam’s Child
Dissociative Checklist (CDC1):
• Child does not remember or denies traumatic or painful experiences that are known to have occurred.
• Child goes into a daze or trance like state at times or often appears “spaced-out.” Teachers may report that
he or she “daydreams” frequently in school.
• Child shows rapid changes in personality. He or she may go from being shy to being outgoing, from
feminine to masculine, and from timid to aggressive.
• Child is unusually forgetful or confused about things that he or she should know, e.g. may forget the
names of friends, teachers or other important people, loses possessions or gets easily lost.
• Child has a very poor sense of time. He or she loses track of time, may think that it is morning when it is
actually afternoon, gets confused about what day it is, or becomes confused about when something has
happened.
• Child shows marked day-to-day or even hour-to-hour variations in his or her skills, knowledge, food
preferences, and athletic abilities, e.g. changes in handwriting, memory for previously learned information
such as multiplication tables, spelling, use of tools or artistic ability.
• Child shows rapid regressions in age-level behaviour, e.g. a twelve-year-old starts to use baby talk, sucks
thumb or draws like a four-year-old.
• Child has rapidly changing physical complaints such as headache or upset stomach. For example, he or she
may complain of a headache one minute and seem to forget about it the next.
• Child suffers from unexplained injuries or may even deliberately injure self at times.
• Child reports hearing voices that talk to him or her. The voices may be friendly or angry and may come
from “imaginary companions” or sound like the voices of parents, friends or teachers.
• Child has a vivid imaginary companion or companions. Child may insist that the imaginary companion(s) is
responsible for things that he or she has done.
• Child sleepwalks frequently.
• Child has unusual night-time experiences, e.g. may report seeing “ghosts” or that things happen at night
that he or she can’t account for (e.g. broken toys, unexplained injuries).
• Child frequently talks to himself or herself, may use a different voice or argue with self at times.
• Child has two or more distinct and separate personalities that take control over the child’s behaviour.
•
When they encounter a threatening situation, trauma survivors may reexperience their old, unresolved feelings of
terror and helplessness. These feelings will then overwhelm their psyches and prevent them from taking
appropriate action, thus leading to a re-enactment and revictimization. For example, a young child is frequently
physically abused and criticized by a father, and she continually feels rage and anger; whenever she is criticized by
others at her work place or in her personal relationships, she re-experiences the rage she felt with her father, and
enacts it in vicious and hostile ways. This in turn would get her into fights that at times got physical and resulted in
her being abused. Other examples of re-enactments include behaviours self-injurious behaviours, walking alone
in unsafe areas or other high-risk behaviours, involvement in repetitive destructive relationships (e.g., repeatedly
getting into romantic relationships with people who are abusive or violent).
Young children also re-enact or mimic what occurred during the trauma in order to try to make sense of what was
happening with them or done to them. For instance, young children who have no understanding of death but
have observed an event of this nature, may lie down and pretend to be like the dead person; or a child who is
being sexually abused and is engaging in sexualized play with other children. In both these instances, children may
be repetitively enacting their experiences to try and make sense of them.
Histories of childhood sexual and physical abuse, and of neglect and separation, are highly significant predictors
of self-harm behaviours such as self-cutting and suicide attempts, and other self-destructive behaviours. Self-harm
behaviours are learnt behaviours that people internalize in their formative years i.e. during childhood and
adolescence. Like all behaviours, they stem from our beliefs and emotions: we act a certain way because we have
certain beliefs and feel certain emotions, all of which determine what actions we take. Self-harm is rooted in self-
loathing and self-erasure. A self-loathing person believes deep down that they are defective and worthless. They
often feel that they are morally bad and therefore deserve the bad things that are happening to them. They may
even believe that they deserve to be punished and suffer. In the context of CSA for instance, children and
adolescents may feel emotions such as anger, guilt or shame, each of which may form a pathway to self-harm
behaviours, as might feelings of helplessness and powerlessness. The anxiety and frustration that children
experience in being unable to disclose about the abuse may also lead to self-harm behaviours.
• Severe trauma interferes with the usual acquisition of self-capacities and developmentally appropriate skills
in children.
• Difficult for the child to acquire and process new information, develop family, social and peer relationships.
• Impairment of other developmental functions of self-identity, social and cognitive skills.
Broadly speaking, there are five key domains in child development --physical, speech and language, social,
emotional and cognitive development. Early and severe trauma interferes with the usual acquisition of self-
capacities and developmentally appropriate skills in children, within these developmental domains. This is thus
inclusive of the development of affect regulation skills (explained above) but also impairment of other
developmental functions relating to self-identity, social and cognitive skills. The achievement of developmental
milestones is impaired because trauma experiences and emotions make it difficult for the child to acquire and
process new information, develop family, social and peer relationships. Also, if the trauma itself is on-going and
protracted and if it involves breakdown of social and civic amenities (due to breakdown in family and social
34
35
support systems), this by itself may lead to a loss of developmental opportunities because access to school is
hindered and peer interactions are reduced.
Trauma affects development both indirectly and over long term. At an inter-mediate level, if a child has lost
someone or is being abused, the anxiety or the pre-occupations it causes affects learning capacities—children
cannot learn in an atmosphere in an environment of unresolved doubts, questions and worries. Irrespective of
whether the geographies or spaces are distal or immediate, trauma and its impact lead to a loss of sense of
mastery. Where there is unpredictability about events that happen or children are unable to control how events
play out, this loss of efficacy also affects self-image in a way in which the child begins to think of herself as weak
and unable to predict negative events or control them when they occur. This then leads not only to negative self-
identity but difficulties with new learning and skill acquisition.
Consider a child who has suffered the loss/ death of a primary caregiver such as his mother—his physical growth
may suffer due to poor nutritional and other basic care; the surviving parent might become extremely over-
protective of the child and not allow him to go out and play with his peers as a result of which his speech and
language and social skills will be negatively impacted; his own sadness and grief and anxiety about how he will be
taken care of and whether the surviving parent may also die, is likely to cause emotional distress that also impairs
his attention and concentration abilities, consequently affecting his cognitive and learning capacities. In the
aftermath of CSA, a young child may be overly protected by the parents, with restrictions on mobility and
interactions with other people. Such a child may have difficulty with developing social skills as well as speech and
language or communication abilities. A child who has suffered CSA may also experience powerlessness and
helplessness that results in her being constantly worried and fearful (of being hurt), thereby also impacting her
identity and self-confidence. Thus, trauma assessments and interventions in addition to using the lens of
psychiatric disorders, to also use that of child development.
35
36
No traumatic experience…normative
developmental trajectories
*QR code for a video explaining the concept available in the Additional Resources section.
36
37
Attachment Trauma
Attachment refers to the major social and relational connection a child makes, with a primary caregiver,
such as with a mother or father (or with a grandparent or guardian)—someone who spends the most
time with the child and provides most of the caregiving. The process of attachment begins in infancy,
and includes various elements of bonding between the child and caregiver, such as meeting basic
needs for survival, physical comfort, affection and responsiveness to the child’s other emotional and
relational needs. John Bowlby, in his attachment theory, said that the emotional and social
development of children is profoundly shaped by their relationship with their primary caregivers i.e. by
the nature of their attachment relationships. In other words, if the attachment process is healthy, it
leads to a person developing healthy relationships through life. Such persons, who have had loving,
nurturing caregivers, who responded sensitively to them in early childhood, are said to have secure
attachment—they therefore feel comfortable expressing emotions, are able to cope with negative
feelings and situations in healthy ways, conducting their relationships with self-confidence and a
recognition of (relational) boundaries.
Inadequate or trauma-ridden attachment relationships can lead to negative impacts on how a person
relates to others, starting in childhood but carrying on into adulthood. Attachment trauma refers to a
disruption in the critical process of bonding between a child and his/her primary caregiver. That trauma
may be overt, entailing abuse or neglect, or it may be less obvious, such as lack of affection or
response from the caregiver. Attachment trauma may also occur if there are traumatic experiences in
the home, such as the absence of the primary caregiver, parental marital conflict, serious illness, or
death. In such situations, the primary caregiver either cannot or does not provide care, affection and
comfort to the child, also ignoring the child’s distress and/or other emotional needs. Attachment
trauma may render children (and adults) more vulnerable to stress, difficulty regulating emotions,
dependency, impulsive behaviours, social isolation, trouble sleeping, difficulty with attention, and
mental illnesses. Attachment trauma may also, in cases of neglect or abuse by the primary caregiver,
place children at higher risk of various types of abuse and exploitation by others. In the context of
attachment trauma, a child may be diagnosed with one of two distinct attachment disorders:
▪ Reactive attachment disorder (RAD) wherein a child rarely seeks comfort when distressed
and often feels unsafe and alone. He/she may be extremely withdrawn, emotionally detached,
and resistant to comforting; he/she may push you away, ignore you, or even act out
aggressively when you try to get close.
▪ Disinhibited social engagement disorder (DSED) wherein a child does not indicate a
preference for his/her parents over other people, even strangers. He/she seeks comfort and
attention from virtually anyone, and does not exhibit any distress when a parent isn’t present.
While they are overly familiar with strangers, children with DSED often have trouble forming
meaningful connections with others.
37
38
Attachment traumas may result in children developing problematic attachment patterns of the
following types:
o Avoidant, or dismissive avoidant, attachment occurs when the caregiver is not sensitive or
reactive to distress in a child. That child is then more likely to avoid showing emotions or to
turn to the caregiver for comfort. Later in life this person may be emotionally distant or
unexpressive, in relationships.
o Resistant, anxious or preoccupied attachment, is the result of a caregiver who is inconsistent or
unpredictable with comfort and responsiveness to distress. The child may use strategies like
neediness or extreme emotional responses to get the attention of the caregiver. As an adult,
someone who formed this type of attachment may feel very insecure in relationships and may
act needy and clingy, always looking for reassurance.
o Disorganized type of attachment occurs when a caregiver’s behaviours are in some way atypical
or frightening i.e. such as being overtly abusive. The child then has no clear strategy for seeking
comfort or attention, and later in life this can lead to very tumultuous relationships.
According to the self-trauma model, early and severe child maltreatment, in addition to its negative
impacts, interrupts child development. It prompts negative emotions in response to abuse-related
stimuli (triggers) and interferes with children’s abilities for acquisition of self-capacities, particularly
those pertaining to emotional regulation. Poor emotional regulation abilities places individuals at
heightened risk of being easily overwhelmed by emotional distress associated with the memories of
abuse and trauma. This in turn results in the use of dissociation and other methods of avoidance in
adolescence and adulthood. Thus, impaired self-capacities lead to the adoption of avoidance
strategies, which further hinder the development of self-capacities.
This negative cycle is exacerbated by the concurrent need to the traumatized person to process
conditioned emotional responses and distorted cognitive schema by repetitively re-experiencing
cognitive and emotional memories of the traumatic event. Such a process also overwhelms self-
capacities and produces distress. If the person is not sufficiently avoidant (or dissociated), the direct
exposure to upsetting material, through intrusion, will not occur; thus, he/she will not be desensitized,
nor will the underlying conditioned emotional distress be reduced. Consequently, the person will
continue to have flashbacks and other intrusive symptoms indefinitely, and will continue to rely on
avoidance responses such as dissociation, tension reduction, or substance abuse to deal with the
negative emotions arising from such re-experiencing. The trauma survivor may therefore present in
therapy as chronically dissociated but beset by overwhelming and unending intrusive symptomology;
and he/she may continue to have difficulties associated with identity, relationships and emotional
regulation.
38
39
Activity 2: Identifying the Impact of Trauma in Children
Materials: Case studies provided under ‘Additional Materials’ at the end of this module (Facilitators
may use any other case studies, from their practice).
Process:
• Ask participants to read each case, with particular attention to the contextual details and the
emotional and behavioural issues described.
• With reference to the conceptual issues discussed above, identify the nature and impact of
trauma as experienced by the child in each case.
Discussion:
• Ask individual participants (or sub-groups) to present their analysis of the case in terms of the
nature and type of trauma impact observed in each case.
• This exercise is also an opportunity to discuss case formulation.
(Case formulation involves the gathering of information regarding factors that may be relevant
to treatment planning, and formulating a hypothesis as to how these factors fit together to
form the current presentation of the client’s symptoms).
39
40
Suggested Readings
▪ Tony Falasca; Thomas J. Caulfield (1999). Childhood Trauma, 37(4), 212–223.
Buckley, S. (2016). Changing minds: Discussion in neuroscience, psychology and education. Gender and sex
differences in student participation, achievement and engagement in mathematics. Australian Council for
Educational Research.
▪ Dye, H. (2018). The impact and long-term effects of childhood trauma. Journal of Human Behaviour in the
Social Environment, 28(3), 381-392.
▪ Briere, J., & Jordan, C. E. (2009). Childhood maltreatment, intervening variables, and adult psychological
difficulties in women: An overview. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 10(4), 375-388.
▪ Cook, A., Spinazzola, J., Ford, J., Lanktree, C., Blaustein, M., Cloitre, M., & Van der Kolk, B. (2005). Complex
trauma. Psychiatric annals, 35(5), 390-398.
▪ Hodges, M., Godbout, N., Briere, J., Lanktree, C., Gilbert, A., & Kletzka, N. T. (2013). Cumulative trauma and
symptom complexity in children: A path analysis. Child abuse & neglect, 37(11), 891-898.
▪ Van der Kolk, B. A. (2007). The Developmental Impact of Childhood Trauma.
▪ Briere, J. (2006). Dissociative symptoms and trauma exposure: Specificity, affect dysregulation, and
posttraumatic stress. The Journal of nervous and mental disease, 194(2), 78-82.
▪ Putnam, F. W. (2006). The impact of trauma on child development. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 57(1),
1-11.
▪ Briere, J., & Spinazzola, J. (2005). Phenomenology and psychological assessment of complex posttraumatic
states. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress
Studies, 18(5), 401-412.
▪ D'Andrea, W., Ford, J., Stolbach, B., Spinazzola, J., & Van der Kolk, B. A. (2012). Understanding interpersonal
trauma in children: why we need a developmentally appropriate trauma diagnosis. American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 187.
▪ Sowmya, B. T., Seshadri, S. P., Srinath, S., Girimaji, S., & Sagar, J. V. (2016). Clinical characteristics of children
presenting with history of sexual abuse to a tertiary care centre in India. Asian journal of psychiatry, 19, 44-
49.
▪ Fox, B. H., Perez, N., Cass, E., Baglivio, M. T., & Epps, N. (2015). Trauma changes everything: Examining the
relationship between adverse childhood experiences and serious, violent and chronic juvenile
offenders. Child abuse & neglect, 46, 163-173.
▪ Briere, J., Hodges, M., & Godbout, N. (2010). Traumatic stress, affect dysregulation, and dysfunctional
avoidance: A structural equation model. Journal of traumatic Stress, 23(6), 767-774
▪ Angela S. Breidenstine, Letia O. Bailey, Charles H. Zeanah & Julie A. Larrieu (2011) Attachment and Trauma
in Early Childhood: A Review, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 4:4, 274-290,
▪ Spinazzola, J., Van der Kolk, B., & Ford, J. D. (2021). Developmental trauma disorder: A legacy of attachment
trauma in victimized children. Journal of traumatic stress, 34(4), 711-720.
▪ Becker-Weidman, A. (2006). Treatment for children with trauma-attachment disorders: Dyadic
developmental psychotherapy. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 147-171.
▪ O'Neill, L., Guenette, F., & Kitchenham, A. (2010). ‘Am I safe here and do you like me?’ Understanding
complex trauma and attachment disruption in the classroom. British journal of special education, 37(4),
190-197
▪ Zyromski, B., Dollarhide, C. T., Aras, Y., Geiger, S., Oehrtman, J. P., & Clarke, H. (2018). Beyond Complex
Trauma: An Existential View of Adverse Childhood Experiences. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling,
57(3), 156–172.
40
41
▪ McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Bromet EJ, et al. Childhood adversities and post-traumatic stress disorder:
evidence for stress sensitisation in the World Mental Health Surveys. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211(5):280-288.
▪ Karatzias, T., Shevlin, M., Fyvie, C., Grandison, G., Garozi, M., Latham, E., ... & Hyland, P. (2020). Adverse and
benevolent childhood experiences in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD):
implications for trauma-focused therapies. European journal of psychotraumatology, 11(1), 1793599.
▪ Beal, S. J., Wingrove, T., Mara, C. A., Lutz, N., Noll, J. G., & Greiner, M. V. (2019, June). Childhood adversity
and associated psychosocial function in adolescents with complex trauma. In Child & Youth Care
Forum (Vol. 48, pp. 305-322). Springer US
Additional Materials
Case 1:
A 4-year-old, adopted child with early history of neglect presented with symptoms of aggressive and disinhibited
behaviour, anxiety, hyperactivity and inattention, obsessions with food, and attachment issues.
Case 2:
6-year-old Vian’s mother died of cancer. He went to live with his aunt and uncle. He saw his uncle murder his
toddler daughter. His uncle sexually abused him. Vian then went to school and tried to undress another child and
lie down on top of her. He also cries easily and gets angry quickly--throwing things at other children.
Case 3:
10-year-old Sara is being sexually abused by her maths teacher. Her parents are not aware of this and they report
(to mental health team) that Sara has ‘black outs and fainting fits’ daily at school—maths class is everyday. When
the mental health team is inquiring about school, Sara becomes suddenly very still and silent (gazing blankly
ahead) for 2 to 3 minutes and then says that she cannot remember what they were talking about.
Case 4:
12-year-old Syed is beaten regularly by his father, sometimes for no particular reason or minor errors (like when
Syed spills something or forgets to do something). He who also tells the child almost daily that “you are
useless…why were you born to this family? You get really low marks in school…you are good for nothing”. One day
when the teacher saw what was happening, and tried to talk to Syed about how wrong the father was to hit him,
Syed insisted that he was a bad boy and deserved what his father said. He also said that his father meant well and
was right in ‘scolding and beating’ him. Syed also often refuses to participate in activities in school, saying ‘I can’t
do it…am not good at it…’
41
42
Case 5:
13-year-old Nisha is was sexually abused by her uncle. When she told her mother about this, her mother’s
response was that her brother (the uncle) was unlikely to have ever done things like this and Nisha must have
done something to ‘make him behave like that’. Nisha now engages in a lot of self-cutting behaviour.
Case 6:
15-year-old Mini has been rescued from sex trafficking. She resists all attempts of rehabilitation by the child care
institution staff saying that she is not worth it. She is angry and demanding, often insistent that she be allowed to
procure substance. She says that the first chance she gets, she wants to go back to either of the two ‘boyfriends’
she had before.
Case 7:
17-year-old Ankit hates to go to the hospital. One time, his friend had a surgery and he went to visit him. The
moment he entered the hospital, Ankit started feeling extreme anxiety and panic; he started sweating and crying.
Some years ago, Ankit’s father had died of cancer in a hospital.
42
43
Time
4 hours
Concept
Definition & Nature of Child Sexual Abuse
Child sexual abuse is the involvement of children and
adolescents in sexual activities (usually for adult sexual Child Sexual Abuse is…
stimulation or gratification) that they cannot fully
…an interaction between a child and an adult where
comprehend and to which they cannot consent as a fully
the child is used for sexual stimulation.
equal, self-determining participant, because of their …exploration of sexuality between minors,
early stage of development. traditionally understood as below 18 years of age,
For the purposes of inquiry and investigation, it is that could be exploitative if the age difference and
power dynamics between them is significant.
important to have a nuanced understanding of child
…not restricted to rape/penetrative genital contact.
sexual abuse, over and beyond definitions of abuse.
…digital handling of the child’s genitalia.
Contrary to what is commonly understood, child sexual …non-genital forms of sexual touching.
abuse (CSA) is not always a one-off act nor is it merely a …non-contact forms of abuse for the pleasure of the
series of sexual actions against a child; particularly in perpetrator such as exposing the child to
cases where abuse is perpetrated by known people, pornography or taking nude pictures of the child.
abuse also comprises of the series of actions leading up *Digital handling refers to sexual abuse wherein no
to the act of sexual abuse. Understanding the different penile-vaginal contact occurred, but a child’s genitals
methods and processes by which child sexual abuse is are assaulted by the perpetrator by use of hand or
perpetrated helps to identify CSA more clearly and thus other objects.
strengthen the evidence to convict the perpetrator.
Material: Video Clip (QR code for the video available at the end of this module.
Process:
Type of Abuse Non-Contact versus Non-contact abuse entails offensive sexual remarks/exposure
Contact of child to nudity or perpetrator’s private parts or observation
of the victim in a state of undress or in activities that provide
the offender with sexual gratification or exposing child to
pornography.
Contact abuse entails touching of the intimate body parts
including perpetrator fondling or masturbating the victim,
and/or getting the child to fondle and/or masturbate
him/her.
44
45
Penetrative versus Using the penis or other objects to penetrate any orifice of
Non-Penetrative the child’s body (including vaginal, anal or oral penetration)
versus other forms of contact abuse that may not be
penetrative.
No. of Single versus One incident of abuse versus many incidents of abuse (over a
Multiple Episodes of period of time…days/ months/ years)
Episodes
Abuse
Single versus
Abuse by a single perpetrator versus abuse by more than one
Multiple
or many/ different perpetrators
Perpetrators
However, the impact of CSA does not necessarily follow a linear logic-based on generic presumptions about what
ought to be more severe. Thus, if a rape survivor were to stoically fight back, without any conventional
misconception on the honour-stigma dimension, there is a tendency to interpret this as ‘so much has happened
and look at her…she seems unaffected’, whereas the truth is that this person may be more resilient or have better
support.
Thus, the severity of the impact of the abuse depends on not only on the type of abuse but also on the duration of
the abuse and very importantly, whether the abuser is a known/ trusted person or a stranger. Thus, CSA is a
complex issue, wherein impact and recovery depends on all of the above variables and how they combine
together to influence the child’s experience of abuse. Finally, even when there are two children, who have been
impacted by identical forms and processes of abuse (similar variables), they may still be different in terms of their
responses. This difference is accounted for personality and temperament of each child, and social context and
circumstances of each child, due to which each child perceives and internalizes the abuse differently, thus resulting
in different emotional and behavioural states or responses to the abuse.
The Dynamics of Child Sexual Abuse: Methods and Processes of Perpetration
Not all child sexual abuse is traumatic or at least not traumatic at the time at which it occurs or the ways in which
it is perpetrated. Let us consider these three examples:
45
46
Example 1: A 6-year-old child has been inappropriately (sexually) touched in various parts of her body by her
uncle, who has over a period of several months, lured her with sweets and toys to spend time with him; his ways of
expressing affection towards the child has been to touch and fondle her in various inappropriate ways. He has also
invented ‘special, fun’ games that entail inappropriate touching and imbued the game with an element of
excitement and secrecy.
Example 2: A 10-year-old boy who lives in a child care institution has been fondled and sexually touched by one of
the staff in the institution. An orphan, having never known a family or any sort of love or support system before,
this boy has a relationship of deep affection and trust with this staff, who spends time with him, plays with him
and ensures that the boy gets additional food, exemption from punishments (that other children may have to
bear).
Example 3: A 16-year-old girl is lured into a sexual relationship with a 25-year-old man, who has told the girl that
she is beautiful, that he is in love with her and would even consider marrying her at a later point. Happy with his
attention and his love and caring, the girl has agreed to physical intimacy with him [following which she gets
pregnant and the man is nowhere on the scene].
If we examine these three examples, we may agree that all of them entail sexual abuse and could be filed as
POCSO cases. However, you also notice that in all three instances, there is no use of violence or force, no injuries
resulting from the abuse and consequently, at least at the time of abuse, no trauma felt by the children concerned.
The 6-year-old has no idea of sexuality or boundaries and since she was not hurt or threatened, but treated with
affection/ given rewards, would not even be able to recognize what was being done to her as abuse, so she is
unlikely to internalize her experience as being traumatic. The 10-year-old, being older, may have some sense of
boundaries around his body and may feel some discomfort but the feelings of confusion, given his relationship
with the abuser, may be greater than any trauma caused. The 16-year-old, on the face of it, may even be accused
(by some people) of having ‘given consent’ and therefore it not even being a case of child sexual abuse; and in
fact, the girl herself may defend the perpetrator with whom she believes she shares a romantic and sexual
relationship.
Thus, the common image of child sexual abuse as being an act of violence and coercion (by a stranger) can be a
misconception i.e. while that form of CSA also occurs, that is not the only method by which child sexual abuse
occurs. So, what are the (other) methods by which CSA is perpetrated? How do different methods of abuse have
varying psychological impacts on children? And why would it be important for mental health professionals/
medical professionals/ child care service providers to understand the method of abuse and its impact?
46
47
Process:
• Play the video on processes of abuse in younger children (QR code for the video available at
the end of this module).
Discussion
Ask the participants to think about the following and discuss in the group:
o Did the abuse happen on the first day or immediately after Bakshi uncle met Komal?
o What were some of the processes used by Bakshi uncle with Komal, to establish a relationship?
(list down the processes as the participants share in the group)
o How did he spend time with her? What were some of the things that he told Komal?
o How did these processes help Bakshi uncle and finally impact Komal? Why was Komal unable
to identify abuse? What could have been Komal’s possible inner voices?
• In addition to the processes, highlight how many a times the blame and responsibility of child
sexual abuse is placed on the parents i.e. they caused abuse by being careless, not being available
enough or by not drawing boundaries with the perpetrator. While neglect and lack of supervision
or absence of parents may make a child an ideal target, more vulnerable to abuse. However, that’s
not the case always. Sometimes despite being in an intact family or having the most alert parents a
child may get sexually abused. it is important to understand that sometimes the perpetrator not
only builds trust with the victim but also uses his or her position of trust and authority to gain
control over the immediate environment and the family of the child.
47
48
However, despite children’s lack of knowledge of sexuality issues, even very young children (around the ages 2 to
3 years) can have a sense of discomfort with (sexual) touching of the genitals and private parts. This is because
socialization processes (and taboos) have already introduced to children, such as the importance of wearing
clothes (especially underwear) and the need to ‘hide’ and ‘not touch’ private parts and genitals. Therefore, in many
children, methods of abuse that use lure and inducement also create confusions regarding love and caregiving
(‘only if I do this [sexual acts], he will love me and play with me’) and around sexual norms i.e. what is socially
appropriate in terms of inter-personal interactions and sexual norms.
Table: Sexual Abuse Processes in Younger Children
Methods of coercion and threat are used to create fear in the mind of the child and force him/her to comply with
the perpetrator’s requests to engage sexually. These methods are used more effectively with slightly older
children, who have more of a sense of the inappropriateness of the perpetrator’s actions. It is a key reason for
children not disclosing the abuse to anyone else.
Although the two methods of inducement & lure, and are different, they are not exclusive to each other.
Perpetrators may begin the abuse process through use of lure and inducement and at a later stage, continue by
coercing and threatening the child, especially if after a certain period of time, the child realizes the
inappropriateness of his actions and wants to or tries to stop the abuse.
Processes of Abuse in Older Children and Adolescents
In older children and adolescents, the processes of abuse are similar but the use of lure and inducement are
slightly different. Given that adolescents are at a life stage wherein they are interested in issues of love, attraction
and sexuality and are also keen to experiment with these experiences, perpetrators tend to use lure and
48
49
inducements that are more emotional in nature (rather than the more material ones used with younger children).
This means that they ‘smooth talk’ adolescents about their physical appeal and qualities, making promises of long
term emotional and romantic relationships with them.
In case of a one-off contact abuse by a stranger, frightening and unsettling as it may be for the child, he/she may
heal better than a child whose uncle has not touched her but has been constantly making sexual remarks to her.
The fact remains that coercive acts and sexual acts that cause injury and tissue damage carry their own valence in
how a child is impacted. Contact abuse, especially in case of coercive and violent processes such as rape, are likely
to be more traumatic for a child and make recovery from the abuse experience more difficult; however, it has also
been found that children who have been abused through coercive processes and injury, despite their trauma, have
(psychologically) recovered better than abuse that may not have been injurious but committed by a known (and
trusted) person such as a family member or caregiver.
Process:
• Play the video on processes of abuse in older children (QR code for the video available at the
end of this module).
Discussion
Ask the participants to think about the following and discuss in the group:
o What were some of the processes used by Vicky bhaiya? (list down the processes as the
participants share in the group)
o How are these processes different from the processes used for younger children?
o What were some of the confusions, fears and thoughts about Vicky bhaiya and the abuse?
49
50
Inducement and lure methods of CSA play out in particularly complex ways in situations of child sex
tourism as happens in many places in South Asia, where children are engaged in prostitution. In such
tourist places, children who come from extremely deprived backgrounds i.e. with lack of resources,
finances, parenting and supervision and opportunities for growth and development, are targeted by
tourism paedophiles and other tourists looking for sexual activity. The dynamics in such abuse and
exploitation is such that the above-described needs are satisfied in exchange for sex. These
perpetrators, also known as ‘sugar daddies’ provide children with food, clothes, toys as well as travel,
activity and fun experiences which take these children away from their childhoods of deprivation and
trauma. Some children recognize the exploitative nature of the relationship but in the balance, (and
perhaps legitimately so in their minds) feel that it is better than the life of poverty and misery that they
normally lead. The more generous the gifts and opportunities for fun and entertainment, the greater
the lure and inducement and unfortunately, the greater the mutual benefit to the child and
perpetrator.
Adolescents from difficult circumstances, those with poor family support, who have been neglected and/or
abused, are particularly vulnerable to such attentions from offenders. Following such manipulation and abuse,
adolescents experience feelings of tremendous confusion, especially as they have shared ‘deep’ sexual and
romantic relationships with the offender. They find it exceedingly difficult to discern this as an abuse process and
defend the offender, often refusing to accept that this is abuse.
• Use of Lure and Inducement Confusions regarding sex and love and
care getting/caregiving
- “I will ensure that even if other children are punished, you
are not punished…you will always have special privilieges…”
[Expressed verbally or through actions].
- “You are so beautiful…you know I love you…no one in the
work cares about you the way I do…” [Manipulation of
adolescent girls].
2
Finkelhor, D, Browne, A (1985). The Traumatic Impact of Child Sexual Abuse: A Conceptualization. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 55: 530–541
50
51
• Transmission of Misconceptions about Sexual Behaviours Confusion about sexual norms and
and Norms decision-making
- “The more people you sleep with the greater your sexual
experience will be…no man wants a girl who is ignorant
about sex.”
- “Sexual experience is important…a real man should have
tried everything at least once…”
- “Not had any sexual experience…that is not cool…what will
other boys/girls your age think of you?
- Guilt, shame
• Blaming the Victim
- Lowered self-esteem
- Offender blames the victim
- High-risk sexual behaviours
- Child infers attitude of shame about activities
- Victim is stereotyped as “damaged goods” (this is
often used to continue the abuse)
Again, given the life stage adolescents are at, often also under peer pressure to experiment with sexuality,
offenders have the perfect opportunity to manipulate them into sexual engagement by transmitting all sorts of
misconceptions about sexual behaviours and norms. For instance, appealing to adolescents’ need to ‘fit in’ with
their peers, perpetrators tell adolescents that it is necessary to gain sexual experience, that it would be ‘uncool’ if
they are ignorant about sexual acts. As a result, adolescents, who are still acquiring life skills such as (sexual)
decision-making, are negatively influenced, believing in the misconceptions transmitted to them, confused by how
they should respond.
After gaining the trust of adolescents, through inducement and lure and transmission of sexual misconceptions,
when perpetrators have successfully engaged the adolescent sexually, they then blame the victim with statements
such as ‘you started this…you wanted this and consented to this…so, it is your fault’. Adolescents then feel ‘dirty
and damaged’, guilty and ashamed.
51
52
52
53
Grooming…A Method of Child Sexual Abuse that Does Not Entail Fear-Coercion Methods
• Selecting and targeting the victim (especially when children are vulnerable due to difficult
circumstances, with little or no family and social support systems).
• Gaining trust and access (through special attention, sympathy to child, playing games/ giving
gifts to gain child’s friendship and affection).
• Playing a role in the child’s life (‘no one understands you like I do & vice-versa’)
• Isolating the child (from family/ others by telling the child ‘I understand you best and love you
the most…the others do not…they don’t know what is right for you…’)
• Creating secrecy around the relationship (through personal contact, letters and phone
calls...imbuing the relationship with a certain specialness and excitement)
• Introducing misconceptions and misnomers about sexual behaviour (‘the greater your sexual
experience, the more useful for you as you grow up…people will think you are old-fashioned if
you have no knowledge and experience of sexuality…’
• Initiating sexual contact (only after a trust and special relationship has been created).
• Controlling the relationship (using the existing advantages of age and power dynamics, threats,
and emotional manipulation...making child believe it was her fault i.e. coercive elements may be
introduced at this stage).
*Adapted from: Georgia M. Winters & Elizabeth L. Jeglic (2017) Stages of Sexual Grooming:
Recognizing Potentially Predatory Behaviours of Child Molesters, Deviant Behaviour, 38:6, 724-733
53
54
Activity: Identifying similarities and differences in the processes of grooming online vs.
grooming in-person.
Material: Video (QR code for the video available at the end of the chapter).
Discussion:
What are some of the processes used by the abuser in this video?
● Identify the similarities and differences in the processes of grooming online and grooming in-
person (as seen in the videos of young children and older children).
● Reflect on the higher levels of secrecy possible through individual phones/computers.
● Convenience of the online space for the perpetrators.
Method: Discussion
54
55
● Female
● Adolescents (13-18 yrs)
● Confusion around sexual orientation
● Frequent internet access
● Low self-esteem
● Low social support
INDIVIDUAL ● Mental health problems social
isolation/loneliness
● Risk-taking behaviours
● Disability
● Previous victimization
55
56
Adolescents (aged 13+) are particularly vulnerable given their normative development and needs at that age.
As discussed earlier, adolescents establish a level of independence and self-sufficiency making peer
relationships in the process. In the digital age, where “being online” is the measure of one’s self-worth and
individuality in real life, adolescents tend to use the internet to assert themselves. This stage of life is also when
adolescents develop interest and curiosity around sexual behaviours. However, given the taboo around
discussing these topics in safe spaces such as classrooms and homes, the internet provides answers and more.
Therefore, adolescents tend to be more vulnerable to the lure of sexual relationships online given their desire
for experimentation.
The pandemic saw a rise in the number of young users (8 yrs - 18yrs) who had to use mobile phones, personal
computers, laptops and other devices often without any supervision from a parent/caregiver for educational
purposes. It is also the case that several parents/caregivers may not be aware of how different applications
even function on devices, sometimes their own, and are therefore unable to monitor children’s activity online.
NOTE: Children who demonstrate vulnerabilities offline are likely to be vulnerable online.
● When VIRTUAL REALITY BECOMES REALITY… A direct risk of online grooming is the possibility of the
online predator contacting and trying to meet the child in-person. The outcome of such an in-person
meeting can even be fatal in some cases.
● Coercing children/adolescents into performing pornographic acts and publishing their pictures/videos
amounting to the offence of child pornography.
● Threatening to publish chats/messages/images/videos in return for more favours or extortion for
money.
● Issues of trafficking through false promises.
56
57
● Studies indicate internet addiction amongst young people is tied to high-risk sexual behaviour online.
● Online gaming may result in the normalisation of socially inappropriate behaviours such as fetishization
of “taboo” relationships, high-risk sexual behaviour and aggression in social settings.
● Such access to inappropriate content through the hallows of the internet increases vulnerability of young
people to sexual abuse and also to the possibility of coming into conflict with the law.
Legal Implications of Online Grooming
The lack of a specific legal definition for online grooming impacts the legal implications for perpetrators. These are
some legal concerns surrounding the issue of online grooming:
● Reporting Considerations
Since there is no specific offence defined under the POCSO Act, 2012 or the IPC, 1860, victims/informants
have no clarity on what exactly can be reported and when reporting must be done. For instance - an adult
misrepresenting their age to a child online, is a criminal offence in other jurisdictions around the world.
However, in India, online grooming must lead to the commission of an offence defined under the IPC,
1860, POCSO Act, 2012 or the Information Technology Act, 2000 in order to be reported.
● Evidentiary Considerations
Given the lack of medical evidence and no strict law regarding the accountability of Internet Service
Providers, Search Engines and Platforms including social media applications to cooperate with the
investigation or Court procedures, reliance would have to be placed on the child witness’ sole testimony.
● Punishment and Sentencing Considerations
As discussed, there is a minimum threshold requirement for statutory offences to be established in order
to punish the perpetrator. The absence of recognition of the offence also means that no one can be
punished for it (as per the principles of criminal law). Furthermore, the provisions in the IPC, 1860 or the IT
Act, 2000 are not gender neutral therefore the protection afforded to male children under the POCSO Act,
2012 will not strictly apply.
57
58
Implications of CSA Methods & Dynamics for Statement Recording & Evidence Eliciting
In addition to eliciting a narrative on the immediate abuse, it is also important to understand the methods and
processes used by the perpetrator to sexually abuse the child. Statements regarding lure-seduction-manipulative-
grooming behaviours as well as on threat and coercion behaviours by the perpetrator help to strengthen the
evidence of abuse. In fact, if the statement focuses only cross-sectionally (at a moment in time) on an incident of
abuse, failing to recognize that CSA is often a process that consists of a series of actions entailing lure, seduction,
manipulation and/or coercion and threat, then some cases may fall i.e. defense lawyers may argue that touching
the child in certain ways, especially when touch is not used in genital areas/ private parts, is not child sexual abuse.
Furthermore, there are several instances, especially in peer relationships, of adolescent girls coercing adolescent
boys into ‘running away and getting married’ and/or into physical intimacy—threats of self-harm and suicide to
coerce boys into doing their bidding are becoming increasingly common. Similarly, there have also been instances
(even if fewer in number) of older girls and women using processes of grooming and/or coercion with adolescent
boys...take for example the case of a 17-year-old boy who was sexually abused by a 19-year-old girl who was his
college mate. Therefore, a conventional approach to understanding abuse i.e. that it is always perpetrated by
males over females, may result in unfair gender biases and improper decision-making about abuse. Providing
justice entails the breaking out of stereotypes regarding age and gender, else, how could a 17-year-old boy (who
is a victim of abuse) hope to be understood and believed (in court and elsewhere) whilst reporting? The fear of
disbelief and of the humiliation of questions that court asks regarding his masculinity are likely to deter male
adolescents from reporting abuse.
Thus, in order to focus on the experiences, events and narratives of abuse perpetration, whomsoever it is by
and whatever the age, the mental health professional or the child care service provider must ask children and
adolescents questions to elicit a more longitudinal narrative of the abuse, for example:
• How do you know this person (alleged perpetrator)?
• Where did you meet him/her and how long do you know him for?
• Tell me about how your friendship/relationship developed...
• What kind of activities did you do in your time together? Tell me all the different things he/you did.
• Can you remember some of the things (s)he used to tell you? Anything that ever made you feel worried or
uncomfortable?
Such questions (asked in a gentle and reassuring manner) will help the mental health professional or the child
care service providers understand the dynamics of the abuse and therefore also to establish that abuse
occurred. It will help establish whether manipulation and grooming processes have taken place—in which case,
even if an adolescent were to say (s)he consented, the court may be able to establish that that consent was
‘manufactured’ and thus decide that there was sexual abuse.3 It is thus important for professionals to apply
their (psychosocial)knowledge of abuse dynamics and processes in evidence gathering and decision-making.
3.
Distinguishing so-called ‘consenting’ sexual relationships from sexual relationships in which grooming and manipulation has taken place i.e. to
‘manufacture’ consent is a challenging task. As of now, some ways of inquiry to make these distinctions are largely available in mental health practice. It
would be useful therefore, for the court, to ask for mental health professionals to conduct some aspects of child sexual abuse inquiry.
58
59
Finally, a nuanced understanding of CSA will help those assisting children to anticipate situations in which
retraction of statements may take place. When abuse has taken place through grooming processes (i.e. lure,
inducement and manipulation) and violence, threat and coercion methods have played little or no role in the
abuse process, children/ adolescents are likely to be reluctant to provide statements; or they tend to retract any
statements previously made about inappropriate touch and interactions with the perpetrator because:
• The abuse is carried out in a seeming context of consent and mutual pleasure.
• Such abuse is carried out by persons in whom children have tremendous trust so children are in a state of
confusion when these persons are suddenly ‘vilified’.
• Due to the emotional and material benefits that children gain from the offender; they may be reluctant to
recognize or concede that the relationship is an exploitative one.
• Due to children/ adolescents being blamed for ‘giving consent’ and the ensuing feelings of shame and
guilt, the social stigma causes children and adolescents to not want to report the sexual abuse.
59
60
• Sometimes there might be a threat from the perpetrator and the threat can also take a very conflicting
form wherein the perpetrator puts the onus of protecting him/her on the child i.e. ‘I will be destroyed…my
life will be ruined…’ as a result of which the child feels guilty and responsible for having got the perpetrator
‘into trouble’.
In such situations, where less overt abuse methods have been used, it requires the magistrates and judges to be
skilled in their inquiry, not only asking about abuse incidents and actions at any given point in time, but also
eliciting information on the nature of the child or adolescent’s relationship and the types of interactions they have
had over a period of time. (The requisite inquiry is described in detail in the final chapter of this training manual).
Note: The above content refers to sexual (abuse) relationships between children or adolescents and adults. If working
with POCSO charges that involve two mutually consenting adolescents i.e. romantic and sexual relationships
between peers, then the perspective required to be taken is a slightly different one. From an adolescent sexual rights
perspective, such relationships actually do not fall in the realm of child sexual abuse. Thus, such cases, ideally should
be referred to the mental health system rather than the legal system. Please refer to Annex 2 on ‘POCSO 2012 in
Action: When and Why it Does Not Work’ for more detailed explanations.
Clinical Contexts of Consultation
There are broadly three contexts in which children present for psychosocial consultation on sexual abuse issues.
The first is when child sexual abuse is already established by agencies and individuals and they refer the child to
the mental health system. Such referrals may be received from:
i) District Child Protection Units;
ii) Childline and child care agencies/ service providers;
iii) Police;
vi) Courts and judicial personnel.
Children are brought by such agencies and bodies either for interventions in the wake of trauma and emotional
problems and/or for inquiry and evidence gathering for use in court cases. Thus, in this context, the mental health
system is not required to establish whether or not CSA has occurred, as it is already known—usually, children
would have reported abuse or in case of children in sex trafficking, they have been rescued through a raid on sex
work institutions, and so the abuse has come to light.
The second context is one in which the child has reported to his/her parents but they in turn, have not reported
the abuse to police or legal systems. However, they seek consultation to provide the child with mental health
interventions.
The third context is when it is not (yet) known that he/she has been sexually abused; the child comes to the mental
health system for some psychological or psychiatric manifestation, but upon enquiry and examination, CSA issues
emerge in one of the following ways:
• The child discloses or reports abuse.
• An adolescent girl is found to be pregnant.
• (Frequent) urinary tract infections in the child are reported by the child/ caregivers and/or genital injuries in
the child are reported/ observed.
• Emotional and behavioural issues that are associated with anxiety, anger and depression.
60
61
It is useful for professionals to know and understand signs and symptoms of CSA. The mental health and health
professionals have to develop the medical and psychosocial reports that may be needed for the legal processes.
When psychosocial reports contain some of the signs and symptoms listed below, the it gives a sense that CSA
has taken place and the inquiry and statement recording can proceed accordingly.
Method: Film viewing and discussion (QR code for the film available at the end of the module).
Process
• Ask the participants about their thoughts or different kinds of impacts of child sexual abuse as seen
in the video.
Discussion
• Different children internalize abuse in different ways and therefore they may also be impacted by the
abuse differently.
61
62
To understand further, there is what is called an index of suspicion in child sexual abuse i.e. when to suspect child
sexual abuse and how true one’s suspicions likely to be. Refer to figure below--it diagrammatically represents the
index of suspicion in child sexual abuse.
At the peak of triangle, the index of suspicion is highest i.e. there is no doubt when a child reports or discloses that
abuse has taken place, especially when a child spontaneously reports without particular inquiry by an adult.
Equally high on the index is pregnancy (in adolescent girls)—a sure sign that sexual abuse has occurred. Genital
injuries and frequent urinary tract infections must lead to suspicion that there is digital handling and sexual abuse
is very likely to have taken place. Emotional and behavioural changes observed in the child are important
indicators of child sexual abuse, however, they come lower on the index of suspicion because these psychological
changes may occur due to a number of reasons (unlike pregnancy or genital injuries which do not have a range of
reasons for their occurrence).
Emotional and behavioural issues relating to anxiety and depression may occur due to sexual abuse but may also
be due to other difficult and traumatic experiences such as parental marital conflict, bullying, learning difficulties
and academic pressures, loss and grief (death-related) experiences…so, while emotional and behavioural changes
may lead to CSA suspicion, further examination and inquiry needs to be made (by a psychosocial or mental health
professional) to understand exactly what difficult event(s) or experiences they are attributable to in a given child.
During inquiry, if sexual abuse is ruled out, then the signs and symptoms may be attributable to other difficult
experiences.
Traumatic Impact of Child Sexual Abuse: Finklehor’s Traumagenics Model
Finklehor’s traumagenics model postulates that the experience of sexual abuse can be analysed in terms of four
trauma-causing factors, or what we will call traumagenic dynamics – traumatic sexualization, betrayal,
powerlessness, and stigmatization. This model provides a helpful way to understand CSA, and may also be used to
assess the impact of CSA trauma on an individual. (Refer to table below for summary of the model). These
62
63
dynamics alter children’s cognitive and emotional orientation to the world, and create trauma by distorting
children’s self-concept, world view, and affective capacities. For example, the dynamic of stigmatization distorts
children’s sense of their own value and worth. The dynamic of powerlessness distorts children’s sense of their
ability to control their lives. Children’s attempts to cope with the world through these distortions may result in
some of the behavioural problems that are commonly noted in victims of child sexual abuse.
Four Traumagenic Dynamics:
➢ Traumatic sexualization
• Refers to a process in which a child’s sexuality (including both sexual feelings and sexual attitudes) is
shaped in a developmentally inappropriate and interpersonally dysfunctional fashion as a result of sexual
abuse.
• It occurs:
o through the exchange of affection, attention, privileges, and gifts for sexual behaviour, so that a child
learns to use sexual behaviour as a strategy for manipulating others to satisfy a variety of
developmentally appropriate needs.
o through the misconceptions and confusions about sexual behaviour and sexual morality that are
transmitted to the child from the offender.
o when very frightening memories and events become associated in the child’s mind with sexual activity.
• The impact on the child varies, according to the child’s age, understanding of sexuality, and the quantity
and types of sexual activity that the perpetrator engages the child in.
• Experiences in which the offender makes an effort to evoke the child’s sexual response, for example, are
probably more sexualizing than those in which an offender simply uses a passive child to masturbate with.
• Experiences in which the child is enticed to participate are also likely to be more sexualizing than those in
which brute force is used.
• However, even with the use of force, a form of traumatic sexualization may occur as a result of the fear that
becomes associated with sex in the wake of such an experience.
• Experiences in which the child, because of early age or developmental level, understands few of the sexual
implications of the activities may be less sexualizing than those involving a child with greater awareness.
• Children who have been traumatically sexualized emerge from their experiences with inappropriate
repertoires of sexual behaviour, with confusions and misconceptions about their sexual self-concepts, and
with unusual emotional associations to sexual activities.
• Traumatic sexualization in young child victims, manifests in behaviours such as sexual preoccupations and
repetitive sexual behaviour, including masturbation or compulsive sex play. Some children display
knowledge and interests that are inappropriate to their age, such as wanting to engage school-age
playmates in sexual intercourse or oral-genital contact.
63
64
• In older adolescents (and adults), it manifests as aversion to sex, flashbacks to the molestation experience,
difficulty with arousal and orgasm, as well as negative attitudes toward their sexuality and their bodies. The
frequently demonstrated higher risk of sexual abuse victims to later sexually assault may also be related to
traumatic sexualization.
• Sexual contact associated in a child’s memory with revulsion, fear, anger, a sense of powerlessness, or
other negative emotions can contaminate later sexual experiences.
➢ Betrayal
• Refers to the dynamic by which children discover that someone on whom they were dependent has caused
them harm.
• Children may realize that a trusted person has manipulated them through lies or misrepresentations about
moral standards, and treated them with callousness.
• Children can experience betrayal not only at the hands of offenders, but also on the part of family
members who were not abusive but unable or unwilling to protect or believe them.
• The degree of betrayal is also related to a family’s response to disclosure. Children who are disbelieved,
blamed, or ostracized undoubtedly experience a greater sense of betrayal than those who are supported.
• Child victims often feel isolated, get involved in drug or alcohol abuse, in criminal activity, or in
prostitution. The effects of stigmatization may also reach extremes in forms of self-destructive behaviour
and suicide attempts.
• The impact of betrayal on young child victims is that there may be an intense need to regain trust and
security, manifested in the extreme dependency and clinging; older adolescents (and adults) have impaired
judgment about the trustworthiness of other people, or in a desperate search for a redeeming relationship.
Women and girls may become vulnerable to relationships in which they are physically, psychologically, and
sexually abused.
• Distrust may manifest itself in hostility, anger and isolation, with an aversion to intimate relationships. In
case of women/ girls, sometimes this distrust is directed especially at men and is a barrier to successful
heterosexual relationships or marriages.
• The anger stemming from betrayal is part of what may lie behind the aggressive and hostile posture of
some sexual abuse victims, particularly adolescents—who may try to protect themselves from future
betrayals of this nature. Antisocial behaviour and delinquency sometimes associated with a history of
victimization are also an expression of this anger and may represent a desire for retaliation.
➢ Powerlessness
• What might also be called disempowerment, the dynamic of rendering the victim powerless – refers to the
process in which the child’s will, desires, and sense of efficacy are continually contravened.
• A basic kind of powerlessness occurs in sexual abuse when a child’s territory and body space are
repeatedly invaded against the child’s will. This is heightened by coercion, manipulation and threat.
• Children feel powerless also when their attempt to stop the abuse fail, including when they disclose and
are not believed.
64
65
• One reaction to powerlessness is fear and anxiety, which reflect the inability to control noxious events.
Many of the initial responses to sexual abuse among children are connected to fear and anxiety.
Nightmares, phobias, hypervigilance, clinging behaviour, and somatic complaints related to anxiety have
been repeatedly documented among sexually abused children.
• Another effect of powerlessness is impairment of a person’s sense of efficacy and coping skills. Having
been a victim on repeated occasions may make it difficult to act without the expectation of being re-
victimized. This sense of impotence may be associated with the despair, depression, and even suicidal
behaviour often noted among adolescent and adult victims. It may also be reflected in learning problems
and running away behaviours.
• A third impact may be Attempts to compensate for the experience of powerlessness. In reaction to
powerlessness, some sexual abuse victims may have unusual and dysfunctional needs to control or
dominate. Some aggressive and delinquent behaviour would seem to stem from this desire to be tough,
powerful, and fearsome, if even in desperate ways, to compensate for the pain of powerlessness. When
victims become bullies and offenders, re-enacting their own abuse, it may be in large measure to regain
the sense of power and domination that these victims attribute to their own abuser.
➢ Stigmatization
• This final dynamic, refers to the negative connotations (e.g., badness, shame, and guilt) that are
communicated to the child through the CSA experience. These become incorporated into the child’s self-
image.
• Such feelings and internalizations may occur due to the perpetrator blaming the victim for the sexual
activity, demeaning the victim, or furtively conveying a sense of shame about the behaviour.
• But stigmatization is also reinforced by attitudes that the victim infers or hears from other persons in the
family or community. It may thus grow out of the child’s prior knowledge or sense that the activity is
considered deviant and taboo, and it is certainly reinforced if, after disclosure, people react with shock or
hysteria, or blame the child for what has transpired.
• Children may be additionally stigmatized by people in their environment who now impute other negative
characteristics to the victim (e.g., loose morals or “spoiled goods”) as a result of the molestation.
• Older children, who are more cognizant of sexuality issues and social taboos/ attitudes towards it are more
likely to suffer stigmatization, as are those who have to deal with religious and cultural taboos.
65
66
Table: Traumatic Impact of Child Sexual Abuse: Summary of Finklehor’s Traumagenics Model
TRAUMATIC Child rewarded for sexual Increased salienceof sexual Sexual preoccupations and
SEXUALISATION behaviour inappropriate to issues compulsive sexual behaviours
The conditions in sexual abuse developmental level
under which a child’s sexuality Confusion about sexual Precocious sexual activity
is shaped in developmentally Offender exchanges attention identity
inappropriate and and Aggressive sexual behaviours
interpersonally dysfunctional affection for sex Confusion about sexual norms
ways. Promiscuity and prostitution
Sexual parts of child fetishized Confusion of sex
with love and care getting/care Sexual dysfunctions; flashbacks,
Offender transmits giving difficulty in
misconceptions arousal and orgasm
about sexual behaviour and Negative associations to sexual Avoidance of or phobic reactions
sexual activities to sexual intimacy
morality and arousal sensations Inappropriate sexualization
of parenting
Conditioning of sexual activity Aversion to sexual intimacy
with
negative emotions &
memories
Isolation Offender blames, degenerates Guilt, shame
victim Lowered self esteem
Drug/alcohol abuse
Pressure on child for secrecy Sense of
Criminal involvement from differentness from
the offender others
Self-mutilation
Child infers attitude of shame
67
Suicide about
activities
Victim is stereotyped as
“damaged
goods”
BETRAYAL Trust and vulnerability Grief, depression Clinging Vulnerability
manipulated
The child’s Extreme dependency Allowing own children to be
immediate or Violation of expectation that victimized
delayed discovery others wil Impaired ability to
that someone on will provide care and judge trustworthiness Isolation
whom they are protection of others
virtually dependent Discomfort in intimate
has caused or Child’s wellbeing is Mistrust; particularly relationships
wishes to cause disregarded of men
them harm Marital problems
Lack of support and protection Anger, hostility
from parents Aggressive behaviour
Delinquency
Sexual behaviours in children are not unusual, and usually appear in a continuum. Most children and
adolescents exhibit sexual behaviours that are typical for their age primary propelled by their curiosity to
gather information about how their bodies function, know about natural life processes such as reproduction,
pregnancy etc. At a very young age, children begin to explore their bodies. They may touch, poke, pull or rub
their body parts, including their genitals. However, these behaviours are not sexually motivated. They typically
are driven by curiosity and attempts at self-soothing. Curiosity about bodies, and their differences, can also
prompt children to try to look at others in states of undress, rub up against them and ask questions
about genitals and toileting.
These behaviours become concerning when the sexual behaviours are developmentally inappropriate for e.g.
when knowledge of the sexual acts or activity is not typical for their age, sexual behaviours are too frequent,
unusual and persisting.
When these kinds of behaviours occur in children, it either is a sign of them being exposed to the adult sexual
activities as a witness or they themselves are responding to these sexual behaviours and are being sexually
abused.
It is important to understand that sometimes the typical/ normative development itself becomes a risk for
sexual abuse. Given that children have curiosity and their inhibitions are lower, the perpetrator may use these
as opportunities to engage them in sexual play activities, asking them to undress, touching them etc. With
older children given their curiosity to find out about relationships, sex and sexuality, the perpetrator may use
the grooming techniques and engage with them and provide them with wrong information about
relationships, sex and sexuality and manipulate them by promoting wrong notions about these issues. So, in a
way the developmental stages themselves may become a risk and vulnerability factor for children and
adolescents in context of CSA. Look at the table below to see some typical sexual behaviours shown by
children at different developmental stages and how these become a risk factor for child sexual abuse.
70
Pre-Schoolers
● Young children seek ● May often lack modesty ● More likely to respond to
pleasure and want to be perpetrators’ requests to
● Do not see themselves comfortable undress and ‘show’ and
from other people’s ● Will undress and run ‘touch’ body parts.
viewpoints around nude in front of ● The lack of social
● Are not self-conscious others development (and related
● Limited ability to plan ● Don’t fully understand cognitive understandings of
and control their the impact of their what is inappropriate) is not
behaviour behaviour on others present – and adds to lack of
● Poor understanding of inhibition.
the long-term
consequences of their
behaviour
They learn through their ● Readily explore ● More easily induced into
senses, especially by using people/objects using engaging in touching of
sight and touch sight and touch genitals
● Children as young as 7
months may touch and
play with their own
private parts
● Self-touch behaviour
appears largely related
to
● Children want to avoid Whether or how often a child ● Child can be engaged in
being punished by their repeats sexual behaviour is sexual activity through use of
parents. Try to avoid often related to how caregivers material rewards (lure).
71
Children often play make- ● They may play or dress Can be engaged in sexual activity
believe. They often pretend up as people of the through play and games. 'Or
to be something or opposite sex. secret fun game...'
someone else ● Playfully exposes or
touches others' private
parts; may ask others to
do the same (you show
me yours, I'll show you
mine)
7 to 12 years
uncomfortable, children
frequently turn to other
sources of information
i.e. from other youth
and from movies/
magazines/ Internet etc
Suggested Readings
▪ Cyber Safety Booklet for Children (For Adolescents). Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE).
https://www.cbse.gov.in/cbsenew/documents/Cyber%20Safety.pdf.
▪ Wekerle, C., Goldstein, A. L., Tanaka, M., & Tonmyr, L. (2017). Childhood sexual abuse, sexual motives,
and adolescent sexual risk-taking among males and females receiving child welfare services. Child
Abuse & Neglect, 66, 101-111.
▪ Cahill, L. T., Kaminer, R. K., & Johnson, P. G. (1999). Developmental, cognitive, and behavioural sequelae
of child abuse. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 8(4), 827-843.
▪ Yoon, S., Voith, L. A., & Kobulsky, J. M. (2018). Gender differences in pathways from child physical and
sexual abuse to adolescent risky sexual behaviour among high-risk youth. Journal of adolescence, 64,
89-97.
▪ Lalor, K., & McElvaney, R. (2010). Child sexual abuse, links to later sexual exploitation/high-risk sexual
behaviour, and prevention/treatment programs. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 11(4), 159-177.
▪ Nurcombe, B. (2000). Child sexual abuse I: Psychopathology. Australian & New Zealand Journal of
Psychiatry, 34(1), 85-91.
▪ Downs, W. R. (1993). Developmental considerations for the effects of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 8(3), 331-345.
▪ Finkelhor, D. (1990). Early and long-term effects of child sexual abuse: An update. Professional
psychology: Research and practice, 21(5), 325.
▪ Finkelhor, D., & Browne, A. (1985). The traumatic impact of child sexual abuse: A
conceptualization. American Journal of orthopsychiatry, 55(4), 530-541.
▪ Lewis, T., McElroy, E., Harlaar, N., & Runyan, D. (2016). Does the impact of child sexual abuse differ from
maltreated but non-sexually abused children? A prospective examination of the impact of child sexual
abuse on internalizing and externalizing behaviour problems. Child abuse & neglect, 51, 31-40.
▪ Spataro, J., Mullen, P. E., Burgess, P. M., Wells, D. L., & Moss, S. A. (2004). Impact of child sexual abuse
on mental health: prospective study in males and females. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 184(5), 416-
421.
▪ Briere, J. N., & Elliott, D. M. (1994). Immediate and long-term impacts of child sexual abuse. The future
of children, 54-69.
▪ Boney-McCoy, S., & Finkelhor, D. (1995). Prior victimization: A risk factor for child sexual abuse and for
PTSD-related symptomatology among sexually abused youth. Child abuse & neglect, 19(12), 1401-1421.
▪ Davies, E. A., & Jones, A. C. (2013). Risk factors in child sexual abuse. Journal of forensic and legal
medicine, 20(3), 146-150.
▪ Plunkett, A., O'Toole, B., Swanston, H., Oates, R. K., Shrimpton, S., & Parkinson, P. (2001). Suicide risk
following child sexual abuse. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1(5), 262-266.
▪ Stewart, J. G., Kim, J. C., Esposito, E. C., Gold, J., Nock, M. K., & Auerbach, R. P. (2015). Predicting suicide
attempts in depressed adolescents: Clarifying the role of disinhibition and childhood sexual
abuse. Journal of affective disorders, 187, 27-34.
▪ Finkelhor, D. (1987). The trauma of child sexual abuse: Two models. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 2(4), 348-366.
75
Additional Materials
Online Grooming
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUjwHPa
h72o&t=4s
76
Time
2.5 Hours
Concept
Studying, surveying, and treating child sexual abuse depends one phenomenon, which is also the most critical
part of child sexual abuse work i.e. disclosure. Disclosure simply means sharing of the abuse experience with
others. Disclosure of abuse may occur in two ways primarily- it could either happen intentionally or
accidentally. In the first scenario, a child may disclose because the abuse, the secrecy and distress has become
too overwhelming for them and they want the abuse to stop or they may even want to protect the abuse from
happening to other children. While in the second scenario, the disclosure may be accidental which means that
after the abuse there could be physical injuries, pregnancy, infections or there could be emotional and
behavioural signs that are noticed by the child’s caregiver and therefore in that context they reach out to the
medical professional or mental health professional, who in turn identify and confirm abuse. Or, in another
given situation there could be a third person who has witnessed abuse being perpetrated against the child and
decides to come forward and report it and therefore the disclosure is made. No matter how the disclosure
comes along, it is always complex and it is only after the disclosure that the efforts to protect and support the
child from potential or ongoing abuse and hold perpetrators accountable for the abuse can be made.
Materials: Audio clip (QR code for the clip provided at the end of this module).
• Play the audio clip for the participants and enter the discussion on disclosure.
• Why do you think Zijah delayed the disclosure or took a long time to disclose?
78
Method: Discussion
Materials: Statements regarding CSA provided at the end of this module.
Process:
• Read each set of statements and ask participants in plenary whether they agree or
disagree…
Discussion:
• Discuss why they agree or disagree with each of these statements.
It is important to note that disclosure is rarely impulsive and it is more likely to occur slowly over time as part
of a process. Children may make a full and detailed account of their abusive experience or they may reveal little
bits of information over time, not necessarily in sequential order and to a range of different people.
Disclosure may happen in different ways. Refer to the table below to understand different ways in which
disclosure may happen.
While we learnt about different ways in which disclosure may happen, sometimes, children may also decide to
intentionally withhold a disclosure. The reasons for not telling may be many and may include the fear of not
being believed, shame, self-blame guilt, fear of upsetting adults/ caregivers, fear of the perpetrator or losing
their family or being moved away from their homes/ institutions etc. In these kinds of situations, the child may
sometimes despite having the opportunities to tell, may completely deny being sexually abused. In this case,
the disclosure may happen accidentally (when the caregiver observes physical/ emotional/behavioural signs) or
only through a third-party intervention (because they have witnessed abuse).
79
When the trauma of abuse is too severe, the mind may remove the traumatic memories by
repression or dissociation. This generally happens due to the helplessness and lack of control
experienced by the person over the abuse incident. So, as defence mechanism the mind may adapt
to the situation by forgetting about the experience while the abuse is happening. The person in this
case therefore may not be able to access the thoughts and memories related to their abuse at all
for a very long time, however these memories of the abuse experience are not permanently deleted
from the mind but only repressed.
The person may slowly recover these memories as they grow older or sometimes even become
adults. They may suddenly find themselves flooded by memories of sexual abuse or flashbacks after
a specific incident or a trigger. Once the memories of abuse start resurfacing it may be a very scary
and confusing experience for the person. The person then may need trauma informed therapeutic
support to make sense of their sudden fragmented recollections.
Once the memory of abuse is sufficiently recovered by the person, the disclosure may be made by
the person in the same manner as other victim of sexual abuse. They may experience the same
worries and anxieties about disclosure and the responses that they may get from those around
them.
Another model highlights the role of socio-cognitive elements in non-disclosure (Bussey & Grimbeek, 1995).
For children to disclose, they need to have an adequate memory of the events that occurred and the needed
skills to communicate details of those events. Therefore, the abuse may not be disclosed because of these four
elements, i) attention – when the child hasn’t paid sufficient attention to the events, ii) retention – when the
child cannot remember sufficient detail due to deficits in memory related processes concerning encoding,
storage or retrieval, iii) production – when the child cannot communicate the event due to lack of verbal or
motor skills for reporting it, and iv) motivation – when the child is unwilling to report it either actively or by
omission. This model concluded that children need to be aware of sexual abuse so that they feel the need to
report the abuse and need to be interviewed in a relaxed and non-intimidating setting and be provided with a
support person throughout the disclosure process. Their fears of negative consequences of disclosing need to
be adequately addressed.
80
Goodman-Brown (2003) identified factors that determined the latency to disclosure, i.e., the duration between
the abuse event and the disclosure. Age, gender, the type of abuse (intrafamilial and extrafamilial), fear of
negative consequences, and perceptions of responsibility were seen to be delaying disclosure in children.
Younger children may not fully understand that abuse is wrong due to their limited knowledge about sexual
matters and societal taboos, and consequently may not disclose. However, their lack of awareness may also
inadvertently cause them to disclose as they may not anticipate the negative consequences of telling, and thus
might be more forthcoming about information that is perceived to be shameful by older children. Older
children are less likely to disclose as they are more aware of the sexual taboos and might fear adverse
consequences of disclosing. Concerning gender, boys are likely to be more reluctant about disclosing the
abuse due to the fear of being labelled as homosexual, seen as weak, or being stigmatized as a victim. On the
other hand, girls are apprehensive about disclosing due to perceived shame and responsibility for the abuse.
Further, if the abuse has occurred within the family, children will take longer to disclose due to the perceived
negative consequences to self and others in the family.
Materials: Video clip developed by ‘Fight Child Abuse’ (QR code for the video provided at the end of
the module).
Process:
• Explain to the participants that they will view a few minutes long video about a girl who is
sexually abused by someone she knows, which will be followed by a discussion about the
same.
Discussion:
• What did you think of the video?
• What were some of the observations you made about the relationship between the child and
her tutor?
• How did the tutor gain the child’s trust?
• Why do you think the child felt scared and that it was her fault?
• What did you think the child was going through? What were her thoughts and feelings?
• Reiterate the factors that impact disclosure in children.
81
Materials: Video clip developed by ‘Fight Child Abuse’ (QR code for the video provided at the end of
this module).
• Explain to the participants that they will view a few minutes long video about a girl who is
scared of negative consequences of disclosure, which will be followed by a discussion about
the same.
Discussion:
• What did you think of the video?
• What were some of the fears you observed in the child?
• What did the mother do to help the child talk about the abuse?
• Can you think of some other ways to help children disclose sexual abuse?
cultural contexts that discourage discussions about sexuality and promote passive acceptance of unwanted
sexual experiences because they are ‘inevitable’ significantly decrease the chances of disclosure by any victim.
Further, perceptions that propagate sexual abuse of children as a ‘family matter,’ which needs to stay within
the family without anyone’s interference also obstruct disclosure.
82
In addition to some of these factors, the nature of adult-child relationship is such that there is hardly any space
for dialogue or discussion, especially about matters related to sex, sexuality and abuse. Therefore, there is also
very little scope for children to disclose experiences of abuse, and assuage their fears. In case of sexual abuse
children already anticipate adult reactions, which are mostly negative and include - shock and disbelief,
blaming child or accusing them of lying, ignoring or minimising the disclosure, anger, rejection, punishment
and avoiding further discussion instead of belief /validation, not being blamed, emotional support (listening,
holding the victim, asking helpful questions) and reassurance of safety, which further leads to delayed
disclosure or non-disclosure. In cases where the child has been sexually abused by an adult they trust; it
becomes extremely challenging and arduous for the child to disclose due to the dynamics of the relationship.
Additionally, adults may have their own discomfort with issues related to sex and sexuality, and may lack
confidence to respond to children (children may have had negative experiences previously on these issues and
may have a sense of the adult’s position on some of these issues) thus, making it hard for children to trust
them with the abuse disclosure. The table below illustrates the range of barriers to CSA disclosure.
83
Type Barriers
In • Disturbed family dynamics (presence of rigid gender roles, chaos & aggression,
relation presence of other forms of abuse, domestic violence, dysfunctional communication,
to others social isolation, presence of substance abuse)
• Family pressure to keep quiet, lack of comfort in relationships with the elders in the
family, lack of understanding in parents or guardians
• Presence of grooming, ‘manufactured consent’ (positive feelings towards the
relationship with the perpetrator, perceived bond of trust/friendship with the
perpetrator)
• Awareness of the impact of telling (police/authority involvement, complicated
legalistic processes, lack of trust in the authorities or the judiciary, perceived lack of
sensitivity in authorities)
• Threats or emotional manipulation by the perpetrator.
In • Taboo of sexuality (lack of discussion of sexuality in society and within homes and
relation schools, difficulties in talking about the body and sexual matters)
to the • Patriarchal mindset, cultural environment that propagates misogynistic attitudes,
society perpetuation of gender stereotypes
• Stigma, labelling (stigma attached to being a ‘victim’, seeking mental health support,
appearing ‘crazy’), and presence of victim blaming
• Absence of services available in mainstream education as well as information on
available help (lack of awareness programs on sexual abuse)
• Culture of silence and denial around the phenomenon of CSA
84
Individual Barriers
Socio-Cultural Barriers
Gender-Specific Barriers
85
Materials: Case studies (provided as ‘Additional Materials’ at the end of this module).
Process:
• Read the case studies and write a narrative from the child’s perspective highlighting the barriers to
disclosure (child’s inner voices, fears and worries about disclosure) i.e. ‘be the child’ and write the
narrative in first person
• Based on the different kinds of barriers to disclosure that we have learnt in the session, categorize
whether these barriers are –
o Individual barriers
• Reflect on what kind of support is needed in each of these cases to overcome the barriers to
disclosure.
As we understand the factors that facilitate disclosure, it also becomes important for professionals to then
develop ways to enable disclosure. The most important steps include helping children understand that their
experiences have been abusive, addressing some of their inner voices (fears and worries about disclosure
including worries about confidentiality), reassuring them of safety and protection. It is only when children
believe the benefits of disclosure will outweigh the cost of disclosure, they speak up
86
✓ Remaining calm – While it is natural for adults to feel shocked, angry, or sad when a child
discloses experiencing sexual abuse, it is essential to stay calm as the child discloses abuse. An
emotional reaction is likely to confirm the child's fear of the negative consequences of telling
someone about it. Children often do not disclose because they fear they might upset their family
members. Therefore, it is crucial to process your emotions in a separate space, preferably in the
child's absence.
✓ Believing and validating the child – You may have questions about the disclosure, but it is
important to demonstrate to the child that you believe them and that they're doing the right thing
by telling you about it. Let the child narrate at their own pace. Children should not be aggressively
questioned when they disclose because that is likely to reflect that you do not believe them.
Remember, the child might have tried to tell someone before you and might have been dismissed
or disbelieved.
✓ Let the child tell the story in their own words – Let the child narrate at their own pace and
in their own words. If there are questions concerning their safety, they may be put to the child in
simple terms and words that are easy for them to understand. Do not force the child to answer
your questions. Do not ask questions that are leading. For example, if the child says, "My uncle
hurt me.", ask the child, "Where did he hurt you?" instead of asking, "Did your uncle hurt you in
your private parts?". This line of questioning can prove counterproductive once the sexual abuse is
officially reported and investigated.
✓ Reassure the child that "It is not their fault!" – Children often blame themselves in such
contexts. It is important to tell the child that whatever happened is not their fault and that they are
not responsible for it in any manner. Let the child know that their disclosure does not change how
you feel about them and that you still love them and care about them in the same way. Never ask
the child, "Well, why did you not tell me before?". Instead, reassure them by saying, "I understand
how hard it must be to talk about it. I am thankful that you trust me with your story, and I will do
my best to ensure that I can help you."
✓ Do not make promises you cannot keep – Do not promise the child that you will keep this
the information about abuse a secret. Remember, as an adult/ professional/ caregiver you are
mandated by the POCSO law to report abuse. Non reporting of abuse can have safety
consequences for the child and strict legal consequences for you as well. Therefore, let the child
know that you might have to tell other people to help them be safe and secure. Reassure the child
that they will be informed about each step and nothing will be done behind his/ her back. Keep
the child in the loop, make them a part of the process so that they are assured that they are not
being lied to.
✓ Let the child know that line of communication is always open – Reassure the child that you
are available and they speak more about it later if they want to. Children might not share
everything in one go and often want to see what happens to them once they disclose. They might
share more details when they see that disclosing has not caused negative consequences for them.
✓ Let the child know that line of communication is always open – Reassure the child that you
are available and they speak more about it later if they want to. Children might not share
everything in one go and often want to see what happens to them once they disclose. They might
share more details when they see that disclosing has not caused negative consequences for them
87
It is also important to remember that the ways in which the adult or the professional responds to the child
sexual abuse disclosure is as important as disclosure itself. CSA disclosures are likely to cause discomfort and
unease in the adults, which might be counterproductive for the child. Adults in children's lives can interrupt this
cycle of shame and silence by creating safe spaces where they can tolerate their discomfort and refrain from
the urge to 'fix' everything for the child. Therefore, there is significant need to build abuse awareness in
children and adults, and create spaces and opportunities for children, wherein they feel safe to talk about such
experiences.
Some other interventions to facilitate disclosure include designing and implementing CSA sensitization and
awareness programs for adults that are aimed at reducing stigma, debunking myths and stereotypes about
CSA. This would also contribute to minimising the blame that is associated with victims, and consequently,
encourage the children to disclose. With respect to familial factors, improving parent-child communication can
increase the chances of disclosure. Additionally, focussing on programs on skills of relationship building and
counselling skills that include for professionals that would allow them to respond to children’s disclosure in a
balanced and reassuring manner. If a child has a trusting, comfortable and non-judgmental relationship with
an adult, and they feel that they will be believed and accepted, it will be easier for them to report abuse.
As discussed in the sections above, when it comes to disclosure children have a lot of fears and worries about
the consequences of disclosure. However, many times, when a disclosure is made by a child the adults face the
dilemma of whether the child’s allegation of sexual abuse can be taken at face value or believed. Given that if
the allegation of sexual abuse was true the implications for the child and their family would be far-reaching,
therefore when child disclosures abuse the professionals and adults often hesitate. They respond either by
asking too many questions to ensure that it happened or with avoidance. Sometimes, they may also worry
about the consequences for the perpetrator, who may be a known person, friend, or a family member. They
make also take positions like “his/ her life will be over” “the law is so strict …what if he/ she is innocent, even if
he or she get acquitted their reputation in society will be spoilt” and therefore may begin investigation of
abuse at their own level after the disclosure.
As was explained in the previous sections, children already are not very trusting of adults when it comes to
making disclosures of this nature, they fear being disbelieved and when their disclosure is responded to with
questions and investigation, instead of reassurance and support their fears are confirmed. This can be
devastating for them and can lead to severe distress. It may also have implications for reporting and further
legal processes.
Let us consider these four situations in order to understand and assess children’s allegation of sexual abuse -
• The child discloses abuse (the abuse did not happen) and the adult/ professional believes the child
• The child discloses abuse (the abuse did not happen) and the adult/ professional does not believe the
child
• The child discloses abuse (the abuse had actually happened) and the adult/ professional believes the
child
• The child discloses abuse (the abuse had happened) and the adult/ professional does not believe the
child
88
Which of the situations would be the best possible scenario and which of these is the worst possible scenarios?
Believe Disbelieve
CSA happened
Upon disclosure, the best thing to do as a professional is to extend support to the child and family and believe
the child. Imagine a situation where the abuse has happened and the professional is doubtful and wants to
examine the truthfulness of the child’s story before proceeding further, and consequently the child is left in the
abusive situation because the mental health professional/ medical professional/child care service provider is
not sure. Think of all the mental health impacts it can have for the child. If at all in a certain situation it turns
out that the child had indeed lied and no abuse had happened, but the mental health professional/ medical
professional/ child care service provider believed the child even then there will certainly be reasons behind why
the child said what he/ she said and those should be explored with the child, explaining the consequences of
such behaviours for the child and the other person. But remember, these are not the rule but exceptions.
Remember the law is logical and not unreasonable. Even after the process of disclosure, the law will implement
its own process and ways to examine the truthfulness of the child’ allegations. We will learn about these
processes in the chapters ahead, however, if the initial response to the child is of disbelief that does not instill
confidence in the child to face the legal processes or the court.
It is therefore, always best to take position of always believing the victim because if you did not believe them
when the disclosed and it turned out that the abuse did not happen, you only hit a jackpot and got lucky and
the child got saved.
89
In summary, it is important to understand that the role of the mental health professional, medical professional,
child care service provider, a forensic interviewer is not to examine the truth. It is to provide mental health and
medical support to the child victim, enable reporting and other legal processes. Think about if you were to
make an error of judgement, would you make it in favour of belief or disbelief?
90
Suggested Readings
▪ Lemaigre, C., Taylor, E. P., & Gittoes, C. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to disclosing sexual abuse in
childhood and adolescence: A systematic review. Child Abuse & Neglect, 70, 39–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.05.009
▪ Alaggia, R., Collin-Vézina, D., & Lateef, R. (2019). Facilitators and barriers to child sexual abuse (CSA)
disclosures: A research update (2000–2016). Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(2), 260-283.
▪ Choudhry, V., Dayal, R., Pillai, D., Kalokhe, A. S., Beier, K., & Patel, V. (2018). Child sexual abuse in India: A
systematic review. PloS one, 13(10), e0205086.
▪ Reitsema, A. M., & Grietens, H. (2016). Is anybody listening? The literature on the dialogical process of
child sexual abuse disclosure reviewed. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(3), 330-340.
▪ McElvaney, R. (2015). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: Delays, non‐disclosure and partial disclosure.
What the research tells us and implications for practice. Child Abuse Review, 24(3), 159-169.
▪ Alaggia, R. (2010). An ecological analysis of child sexual abuse disclosure: Considerations for child and
adolescent mental health. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(1),
32.
▪ Fontes, L. A., & Plummer, C. (2010). Cultural issues in disclosures of child sexual abuse. Journal of child
sexual abuse, 19(5), 491-518.
▪ Azzopardi, C., Eirich, R., Rash, C. L., MacDonald, S., & Madigan, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of the
prevalence of child sexual abuse disclosure in forensic settings. Child Abuse & Neglect, 93, 291-304.
91
Additional Materials
Case 2:
Simran is a 16-year-old girl who is extroverted and likes to socialize with her peers. She is very active on social
media and likes to post her pictures. Sometimes, she exchanges her private pictures with her boyfriend on
social media. Unknown to her, her boyfriend saves these pictures on his phone. In a recent party at his place,
she ends up experimenting with alcohol and becomes inebriated. She finds it enjoyable and starts singing,
laughing, and dancing closely with her boyfriend. During the dance, she accidentally spills alcohol on her
clothes and goes to the washroom. On her way there, her boyfriend’s brother blocks her way and asks her to
come into his room. Once there, he tries to kiss her and undress her. When she resists, he tells her that he has
already seen her revealing photos and says that no one will believe her over him because of the way she
behaved at the party.
Case 3:
Austin is a 7-year-old boy who lives with his mother who works to support them both. His father passed away
when he was an infant. His maternal grandparents stay on a different floor in the same house. They share the
same house help (Mohan) who is an 18-year-old male and has lived with the grandparents for the last 3-4
years. Austin is a shy child and takes his time to warm up to people. Many times, he is left in the care of his
grandparents or Mohan as his mother works a lot. One day, Mohan asks Austin to play a ‘secret game’. During
the ‘secret game’, Mohan makes Austin perform oral sex on him. Mohan tells him not to tell anyone because it
is a secret and that he might get into trouble for it and be thrown out of the house. Austin does not
understand what exactly happened but feels very bad about it.
Case 4:
Rani is 8-year-old girls whose parents have recently separated. She lives with her mother and often feels angry
about her parents. She has also been having difficulty concentrating in school and consequently, her grades
have been affected. The teachers frequently find her distracted in class and report that she disturbs other
students as well. One day in school, she goes to the washroom during her class. When she comes out, she finds
the school gardener in the washroom who forces Rani to take her clothes off and then sexually abuses her. He
then shows her a knife and threatens to kill her if she told anyone about it. Rani feels extremely scared and
does not say anything to anyone. However, the next day, she goes to her teacher and tells her what happened.
The teacher then takes her to the principal where Rani recounts the ordeal again. The principal responds by
scolding Rani and telling her not to ‘make things up.’ She tells Rani that she will be punished if she continues
to lie about it.
Case 5:
Arjun is a 17-year-old extroverted boy who is very active on social media. He is currently in a relationship with
an older woman who is 27 years old. He met her on a social media app that connects people with common
interests. Initially, they would exchange messages throughout the day and gradually began to have long phone
93
conversations late at night. Whenever he wanted to meet her, she would pick him up and take him to her
house as she lived by herself. Once there, they often consumed substances such as alcohol, marijuana etc, and
engaged in sexual activities. Arjun has had similar relationships with other older women (21-30 years)
previously. He believes that he is “adult” and “mature” enough to engage in romantic relationships with older
women. He is often told that he is “wise beyond his years” by his partner. Therefore, he believes that she really
loves him and enjoys the relationship.
Case 6:
Siddharth is a 14-year-old orphaned boy who has been residing in childcare institutions since he was a young
child. He is referred to a mental health institute for evaluation as he has behavioural issues, i.e., anger
outbursts, breaking things, doing the opposite of what he is told etc. He is known to be a “troublemaker” at
the institution. Unbeknownst to anyone, he was sexually abused by one of the staff members of the institution
who told him not to tell anyone because no one would believe him as he is always creating problems. He also
threatened him with severe consequences if he told anyone. Siddharth feels very angry and hopeless about his
situation.
94
● To understand how experiences of abuse are internalised and stored in memory (not always accurately).
● To get a glimpse of the difficult dynamics of reporting from a CSA victim’s perspective.
Time
3 hours
Material: The movie titled ‘The Tale’. The movie may be accessed on various OTT platforms.
Synopsis of Film
Jennifer Fox is an acclaimed documentary filmmaker and
professor in her 40s when her mother, Nettie, calls her in
alarm after discovering an essay she wrote when she was 13.
The essay is about a "relationship" Jennifer had when she
was 13 and which she dismisses as something she hid from
her mother at the time to not upset her, because her
boyfriend was "older".
After the camp, Jenny kept her horse with Mrs. G and
continued to see her and Bill on the weekends. Eventually
Jenny began spending time with Bill alone. He
began sexually grooming her, until finally raping her, telling
her that they were "making love".
As Jennifer continues to investigate that summer, she realizes that Bill and Mrs. G were probably grooming
other girls. She remembers a college student named Iris Rose who worked for Mrs. G. Jennifer tracks Iris Rose
down who tells her that she, Mrs. G and Bill had threesomes and that Mrs. G was actively involved in finding
girls for Bill. This prompts Jennifer to remember that she was supposed to participate in group sex with Mrs. G,
Bill and Iris one weekend. However, Jenny, who threw up each time she was raped by Bill, had an anxiety attack
and threw up the day before she was due to go away for the weekend, causing her mother to keep her at
home. Realizing she no longer wanted to be in a relationship with Bill, Jenny called him and broke up with him,
even as he pleaded with her to stay. Unlike Bill, Mrs. G coldly accepted Jenny's decision to remove her horse
that weekend. Jenny wrote about her time with Bill in an essay for school (calling it a work of fiction) in which
she proclaimed herself a hero, not a victim; this is the essay her mother finds at the beginning of the film.
Jennifer goes to an awards ceremony where Bill is being honoured to confront him, calling him out as a child
molester in front of his wife and the other attendees. Bill denies everything and leaves. Jennifer has a panic
attack and goes to the bathroom, and imagines sitting with her 13-year-old self.
Discussion
● What was the most unforgettable moment in the film for you?
● What are all the different processes/methods by which Jennifer is groomed and abused?
● How are abuse experiences internalized and get stored in memory (not always completely accurately)?
● What are the immediate and long-term impacts (personal and professional) of CSA, especially of
grooming? Does Jennifer suffer from any “sleeper effect”, i.e. serious symptoms that surface many years
after the abuse?
● How did Jennifer perceive the abuse…and what impact did this have on her decisions for disclosure (or
reporting)?
96
• To understand how children perceive and internalise their abuse and trauma experiences.
Time
3 Hours
Method: Simulation
Material: None
Process
Provide the following situation to the participants: “In a Bombay local train, some years ago, a
young girl with intellectually disability was sexually abused by a man. There were 7 other people on
the train, in the same compartment but they did not respond or do anything to help.”
Tell them that each one of them is one of the 7 people on that train.
Ask them to state what their internal voices would be. (What would they be thinking at that
moment, about the situation at hand?)
Discussion
Concept
Explain to the participants that the internal voices or the thoughts that they listed during the exercise are called
inner voices. These inner voices are the voices that play out in our minds, since the time we wake up and as we
experience different events and go about doing our work through the day. These inner voices also influence
our behaviours. For example, if we look at the previous exercise the inner voices such as ‘I don’t want to get
into trouble’, ‘What if I try to help this girl but the man tries to hurt me’ ‘How can I stop this all the six other
people are silent, why should I be the hero?’ lead to feelings of fear or indifference and the person therefore
97
may decide to not step forward and help the girl who was being sexually abused in the train. However, if the
inner voices were to be changed and if they were to become ‘how can this person do this? I need to stop him,’
‘I think I need to do something because she cannot even defend herself…let me go ahead, I don’t care if others
come or not.’ may lead to the person going forward and stopping the abuse or taking some action to protect
the girl.
Just like we have these inner voices that influence our behaviours in different situations, a child’s behaviour
may also be influenced by their inner voices or their own processing of the events around them.
To understand and analyse why children behave the way they do or where their behaviours or emotional issues
come from, a simple yet effective framework called the inner voice framework has been developed. It
comprises of 5 key elements, and most information available about the child, including the child’s history and
current state including emotional and behavioural issues, can be fitted into this framework to analyse the
child’s context and behaviour.
Similarly, a single context may lead to different behaviours in different children: for example, there may be 3
children all of whom have been sexually abused; but despite the same context and experience, they may have
very different behaviours—one child may show aggressive behaviours (due to anger); another may have self-
harm/ suicide behaviours (due to depression); and the third child may have frequent headaches and stomach
aches (due to anxiety). Even when the behaviour is the same, the contexts vary, thus necessitating different
interventions i.e. how we respond to a sexually abused child (with anxiety) is going to be different from how we
respond to a learning disabled child (with anxiety).Similarly, we cannot have identical responses to children
who are from similar contexts because their behaviours are entirely different i.e. a child with self-harm issues
(due to sexual abuse) requires different interventions from a child with aggressive behaviour (also due to
sexual abuse).
Thus, merely looking at the behaviour tells us nothing unless we know the context out of which this behaviour
developed. Consequently, addressing only the behaviour will be of no use, because unless we understand the
context and address the processes that then led to that behaviour, the behaviour itself cannot change.
Understanding contexts is therefore critical to identifying the nature of the problem and developing a
response. In order to develop interventions accurately, we need to understand the context and the processes
leading from the context to the behaviour.
Context: Context refers to the child’s location, living arrangements and family situation, which is where the
primary experience of the child comes from i.e., it refers to the child’s universe, which then gives rise to certain
98
experiences, emotions and behaviours. For instance, is the child at home or in an institution? Is the child
orphan/ abandoned or living with caregivers? Is it a single parent family or is an aging grandmother taking
care of the child? Are the parents/ caregivers HIV+ and/or have other illnesses? Are there family and marital
conflicts (or alcohol dependence) at home? Has there been a death in the family?
Experience: This refers to the child’s experience of the living arrangements and family situation/
institutionalization and events thereof. For instance, is the child’s experience one of physical neglect (not
receiving basic survival needs), or of emotional neglect (not receiving love, support, encouragement) in a
situation of being orphan/ abandoned or in a single parent family or in a situation of parental HIV/illness? Is
the child’s experience of separation or loss in a situation of institutionalization or death in the family? Is it an
experience of sexual abuse? Is it an experience of emotional abuse due to stigma and discrimination practices
of the family/ school?
It is important here to make the distinction between context and experience—two children from similar
contexts do not always have the same experience. For example, the death of a parent, on the face of it, may
lead us to view it as a loss experience to child X (and indeed it may be); but the death of a parent may not be
as serious a loss experience for child Y because he disliked his parent and had a very poor relationship with
him. Or, in case of sexual abuse you may see that the sexual abuse has led to serious emotional distress in
child A, the experience is of coercion and violence in her case, while child B, seems ‘normal’ and shows a lot of
aggression towards the mental health professional or child care service provider because she was ‘in love’ with
the perpetrator and ‘wants to go back to him’ (as a result of the sophisticated grooming techniques employed
by the perpetrator). Thus, each child’s experience of a given situation is unique, and while there may be
similarities, there are also differences, which is why we must not assume that a child’s experience is or must be
a certain way. So, how do we understand this experience? This brings us to the third element of the conceptual
framework, that of the child’s inner voice.
Inner Voice: This refers to the child’s internalization of the experience. Between a traumatic event (experience)
and its consequence (behaviour), what is critical is how child internalizes it. Often, we try only to manage the
behavioural manifestations of the problem without understanding the internalization.
The internalization or the inner voice of the child is basically how the child understands and processes the
traumatic event. (Recall the activity about the Bombay local train). For example, a common inner voice in a
child who has experienced sexual abuse is “I am damaged” and “I am powerless”; or the child’s internalizations
may be “I am responsible for what happened/ it is my fault”. It is the thought or feeling in the child’s mind that
may or may not be verbalized. When it is still at a non-verbal stage, as a thought, it is called the ‘inner voice’.
At a given point a person may have multiple inner voices.
Even if the experiences are similar for two given children, i.e. that of sexual abuse, their internalizations may be
very different: while child X’s inner voice may be ‘I am damaged and powerless’, child Y’s response may be ‘this
is not fair…how dare he do that to me.’ Thus, the nature of internalization or what a given child’s inner voice
says is what leads to the development of certain emotions, which in turn lead to certain behaviours.
Emotions: These refer to a child’s feelings or psychological states, usually derived from certain contexts and
experiences, which lead to a set of internalizations. For example, internalizations such as ‘I am damaged and
powerless’ lead to emotions of frustration and hopelessness while those such as ‘this is not fair…how dare he
do that to me’ lead to anger. Again, it is therefore not just contexts and experiences that determine children’s
emotions but the inner voice that does so. Examples of emotions are love, hate, anger, trust, joy, panic, fear,
and grief.
99
Behaviours: These refer to the response to emotions or to the final consequences of context, experience,
internalizations and emotions. Unlike emotions, which are internal in origin and nature and not always
observable, behaviours refer to actions that are observable on the outside. For instance, hitting someone,
throwing things, crying, being silent, not engaging socially are all behaviours—and the emotions behind them
may be anger, sadness, anxiety etc.
Material: None
Process:
• Explain that: it is important for us to make the distinction between emotions and behaviours
(the two often tend to be confused). Emotions are how we feel… usually internal or not visible
to the outside world unless we show them through behaviours. Behaviours are
external…actions we perform that are visible to the outside world, to others.
• Go around the room and ask each participant to name an emotion.
• Next, go around the room and ask each participant to name behaviour.
• Tell them that they cannot repeat the emotion or the behaviour i.e. if another participant has
already said it.
• Ensure that participants are clear about the difference between the two words/ concepts: for
example, anger is an emotion and the (corresponding) behaviour would be verbal abuse,
breaking things etc; love is an emotion and hugging/ kissing are behaviours; possessiveness is
an emotion and being clingy may be a related behaviour. Thus, you can enable participants to
also link emotions with behaviours—by asking what emotion lies behind a behaviour they
have named or vice-versa.
100
The inner voice framework that we have worked with is reflected in Susan Wieland’s Internalization
Model, contained in her book “Hearing the Internal Trauma-Working with Children and Adolescents
Who Have Been Sexually Abused”. As a child experience her world, she absorbs information,
consciously and unconsciously, information in regard to herself and her relationship with the world.
From a neurological perspective, a child’s sensations and perceptions become either implicit
memories i.e. not constructed with words, or explicit memories i.e. facts and events, emotional
associations, sensorimotor responses, and stress responses that are established in the implicit
memory are then recorded in the explicit memory. Such previously acquired information and
emotional associations are processed along with new experience, in accordance with the
developmental level of the child.
As Melanie Klein said, in psychoanalytic terms, “the outer world, its impact, the situations the infant
lives through, and the [persons] he encounters are not only experienced as external but are taken
into the self and become part of his inner life.” She also said that once a situation is internalized, “it
may become inaccessible to the child’s accurate observation and judgement” but continues to exist
and influence the way the child sees himself or herself and his/her world, even if he/she is told by
others that the world is not necessarily that way. Thus, as a child internalizes experiences of self, and
self in relation to others (as applicable also in Bowlby’s theory of attachment), the child creates an
internal working model, which forms a base from which the child interacts with the outer world. The
taking in and processing of the meaning of outer experiences as they relate to the self is what
Wieland calls ‘internalizations.
The internalization model thus enables mental health workers to better understand and address the
child’s inner world and experience. The experience of abuse alters the child’s internal sense of self,
and of the world—which in turn affect the ways in which he/she responds to his/her environment. As
abuse-related internalizations are addressed, the negative internal experience of self and the world,
due to abuse, shifts—and consequently, leads to emotional and behavioural changes.
The internalization model therefore describes: (a) the child’s abuse experience; (b)the child’s
internalizations resulting from this experience; (c) the child’s behaviours arising from the
internalizations. (See Figure below). The manner in which the child experiences the event is
influenced by the child’s developmental level, his/her temperament, present understanding of the
world (internalizations from earlier experiences).
101
102
In summary, it is important to understand events of trauma in children’s lives, using the Inner Voice
Framework because…
o Interventions for sexually abused children commonly focus on behaviours/ sign and symptoms
without seeking to understand the emotions behind them, and without consideration of how
those emotions came about.
o Behaviour is only the end result of an entire process that includes context, experience,
internalization and emotion. Therefore, if the intervention focuses on the behaviour consequence
(such as telling the child not to hurt herself) fails to focus on the internalization (‘I am damaged
and powerless’) that lead to the behaviour consequence in the first place.
o But if the intervention focuses on creating experiences of empowerment and agency for the child
so as to make her believe she is not damaged, it addresses the internalization that has occurred;
and the behaviour consequences will, as a result, also be altered.
o It is essential to understand children’s emotional and behaviour problems in a nuanced context-
specific manner, duly considering individual children’s perceptions and experiences and most
importantly, how they internalize these or what their inner voices are with regard to their life
situations and experiences.
103
Material: Flip chart sheets and markers; case studies (see ‘Additional Material’—or use any case studies
that the group brings).
Process:
Tell the group that now that we have done a round of practice on inner voices, emotions,
and behaviours, and have some clarity on these concepts, we will proceed to doing the case
study analysis in which they will apply these concepts.
Divide participants into sub-groups of 3 to 5 members each and assign 1 (or 2 in case there are
fewer participants) case studies to each sub-group.
Ask participants to read each case study and analyse it using the concepts in the overview that
you just provided and fill out the matrix below (concepts already discussed) i.e. to include the
context, experience, inner voice, emotions, and behaviours of the child in each case. (They may
work backwards from behaviour and/or forwards from context).
Discussion:
Ask each sub-group to share their analysis in plenary, inviting others to comment and provide
additional viewpoints.
Emphasize how a single context can lead to multiple behaviours and how multiple contexts can lead
to a single type of behaviour. So, a context and behaviour need be understood by focusing on the
inner voice of the child i.e. what meaning the child makes of her context and experiences, how this
leads to the development of certain feelings or emotions and how then she chooses to express her
inner voices and emotions through her behaviours. How interventions therefore need to focus on
changing the inner voice of the child, for, this is what will lead to changes in emotions and
consequently, changes in behaviour…so the crux of problem analysis lies in being able to accurately
identify or listen to the child’s inner voice.
A 14-year-old girl, had her 25-year-old cousin come to stay at her home. When her family was in another
room, he touched her private parts and told her he loved her. Some days later, he left and did not stay in
contact with Mamata, who is now not able to concentrate on her classes, finds it difficult to fall asleep and
talks rudely to her family.
Suggested Reading
▪ Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J. P., Baciu, M., & Loevenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little
voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation
to self-monitoring. Behavioural brain research, 261, 220-239.
▪ Heery, M. W. (1989). Inner voice experiences: An exploratory study of thirty cases. Journal of
Transpersonal Psychology, 21(1), 73-82.
▪ Wieland, S. (1998). Techniques and issues in abuse-focused therapy with children & adolescents:
Addressing the internal trauma. Sage.
▪ Rizzo, T. A., & Corsaro, W. A. (1988). Toward a better understanding of Vygotsky's process of
internalization: Its role in the development of the concept of friendship. Developmental Review, 8(3),
219-237.
▪ Holodynski, M. (2013). The internalization theory of emotions: A cultural historical approach to the
development of emotions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(1), 4-38.
▪ Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Spinrad, T. L., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Reiser, M., ... & Guthrie, I. K.
(2001). The relations of regulation and emotionality to children's externalizing and internalizing
problem behaviour. Child development, 72(4), 1112-1134.
▪ Camodeca, M., & Coppola, G. (2016). Bullying, empathic concern, and internalization of rules among
preschool children: The role of emotion understanding. International Journal of Behavioural
Development, 40(5), 459-465.
▪ Hanish, L. D., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Spinrad, T. L., Ryan, P., & Schmidt, S. (2004). The expression
and regulation of negative emotions: Risk factors for young children's peer victimization. Development
and psychopathology, 16(2), 335-353.
▪ Zeman, J., Shipman, K., & Suveg, C. (2002). Anger and sadness regulation: Predictions to internalizing
and externalizing symptoms in children. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology, 31(3), 393-
398.
106
Additional Materials
Case Studies for Activity on ‘Identifying Problems, Contexts & Child’s Inner Voice’
Case 1: An 8-year-old is being sexually abused by the school bus driver. He cries all the time and has
nightmares and tells his mother that he does not want to go to school any more. One day, his mother (who
does not know about the abuse) has forcibly brought him to school and the child tells you what is happening
on the bus daily.
Case 2: A 15-year-old girl is suddenly doing poorly in academics and getting into arguments with her peers;
when people get upset with her or ask her why she is behaving that way, she just bursts into tears. One day,
you call and gently ask what is troubling her…she tells you that her uncle, who visits her home regularly,
comes into her room each night and touches her genitals. [She also tells you later that her father’s friend has
touched her similarly once].
Case 3: A 10-year-old is an orphan child residing in a child care institution. He came to the counselor for
treatment for behaviour problems, during the course of which he reported sexual abuse by one of the
institution staff (other staff deny that this happened in their institution, saying child is lying).
Case 4: A 14-year-old girl, had her 25-year-old cousin come to stay at her home. When her family was in
another room, he touched her private parts and told her he loved her. Some days later, he left and did not
stay in contact with Mamata, who is now not able to concentrate on her classes, finds it difficult to fall asleep
and talks rudely to her family.
Case 5: A 16-year-old girl rescued from sex trafficking is now in a child care institution. She was trafficked by
her family. She has been in sex work for the last two years. She is angry and aggressive all the time. She is
mistrustful of people and keeps talking about revenge. At other times, she says that her life is over—since her
self-respect has been taken away. Institution staff also report that she ‘dresses up’ (wears make up) and tries
to go up to the terrace, from where she signals to men/boys that she sees below…shouting out to them to
catch their attention.
Case 6: A 15-year-old girl has been sexually assaulted by a 19-year-old boy; he first be-friended her, told her
that he loved her and then engaged her sexually—she says that the sexual activity was without her consent.
However, now she also tells her parents that she does not want a police complaint lodged against him and
that she wants to be with him—to move out of home and live with him. She is sad and depressed but also
aggressive at times, threatening self-harm if her parents do not allow her to be with the boy.
107
To be able to talk to children about difficult and traumatic experiences, first we must be able to talk
to children. Do we have conversations with children about everyday issues? Do we talk to them to
ask what their views and opinions are and what they want or aspire to? Are we deeply interested in
what children think and feel? Because, only then can do we have the basis to speak with them about
sensitive issues such as sexuality, about difficult and traumatic experiences such as abuse.
Therein lies the importance of being able to communicate with children…and in order to inquire or
interview them, especially about difficult life experiences, we first need to be able to talk with them.
Concept
10-year-old X sits before the mental health professional/ child care service provider not saying a word. The
mental health professional/ child care service provider keeps asking her questions but the child withdraws
further and remains silent. This is a common phenomenon, especially in case of children who might have had
difficult experiences. They are confused and frightened and unsure of whether to trust and what to respond.
108
They may also be unable to verbalize their feelings or respond. It is therefore important to make the child
comfortable and establish a relationship before proceeding to discuss his/ her problem.
Rapport Building is the first stage towards building a relationship with children. It involves 4 broad steps:
Process
- Play the video and ask the participants to observe the interaction between the professional and the
child.
Discuss:
- Ask them about the what were some of the things said by the professional …what were some of the
steps followed?
-Which kind of inner voices will be addressed through the process?
introducing yourself; preliminary establishment of context; ensuring confidentiality; getting to know the child.
These should be done in the first or at least first two sessions with the child--they pertain to first or initial
contact with the child. How to build rapport and get to know the child
a) Introducing yourself
While this might sound obvious, many mental health professional/ child care service provider s and child care
professionals either forget or do not think it is necessary to introduce themselves to the child. The question is,
when a child does not know who you are, why should they talk to you, that too, to tell you about their difficult
issues? Also, many children, by this time have been compelled to be a part of various enquiry processes,
answering the same sort of questions over and over again, especially in cases of child sexual abuse. How do
you, as a mental health profession/nal/ child care service provider (or any other child care service provider),
establish your identity as being different from others the child may have encountered (such as police, doctor,
superintendent…)? Introducing yourself (first) also helps to create a more equal platform for interaction versus
only asking children to introduce and talk about themselves.
➢ Greeting
Example:
▪ “When you have fever or tummy ache, you go to a doctor to help you. In the same way, when you are
feeling sad and upset about many things, I am here to help you feel better and see how to solve some of
the problems you might have. We can play or talk about the things that are worrying you and we can
see how best to make them better.”
▪ “At school, you have a foot-ball/ sports coach who helps you play games better. I am a bit like that…I am
here to help you feel stronger and happier…to help you with any troubles you may have…help you think
about things and think about how best to solve some of your troubles and reduce your worries.”
Since children have not been believed or heard by many adults, they may assume or believe that the mental
health professional/ child care service provider is ultimately going to say exactly the same things as their
parents/ caregivers or teachers. That they will not be heard and their view point will not matter. Sometimes,
they may remain silent or hold back because of these reasons. It is therefore, important that the professional
instils confidence in the child that they are ultimately on the child’s side and will believe the child no matter
what.
110
Example:
• “Different people see things in different ways... So it is perfectly alright if you see the issue differently from
your parents/teachers... But given that they have expressed a concern, it would be helpful if we are able to
respond to them and put forward our perspective. And we would be able to do this in a convincing way only
if I have a chance to understand your perspective and story… and you and I together have some discussions…
we then make a plan on how to explain your story and viewpoint to them.”
• “Remember what I told you in our first meeting… That this part of our organization works only with children,
not adults. While I will certainly listen to what your parents and teachers say and I respect it, what you think
and feel is the most important thing to me!”
• “I also want to assure you, that I will not make any decisions without consulting you and discussing with
you… I will not do anything without your permission.”
Many children come to mental health professional/ child care service provider s or child care workers without
really knowing what they are being asked to see the mental health professional/ child care service provider
for; caregivers are often silent and do not tell the child what issue they want to consult the mental health
professional/ child care service provider about. Establishing a context for interactions and work with the child
is therefore critical i.e. if the child is not aware what issues need to be addressed or does not agree that
he/she has a problem, then, there is no basis for counselling interventions! So how do we establish the
problem context so that we have a consensus with the child that there is a problem so that we can work
towards addressing it?
Example:
• “Do you know why you are here with me? What were you told?”
• “Tell me a little about why you were asked to come and see me…”
• “These days, mummy has been observing that you are sad and not participating in activities as before…you
look a little tensed and worried.”
• “I have been observing lately that you get upset and there are lots of disagreements and fight between you
and your friends …sometimes even with mummy and daddy.”
• “I have been told a little bit about why you are here…let’s take some time thinking about it so that we can
find ways to work on your concern. Your class teachers concern (not complaint) is that you tend to be upset
and angry these days. Do you agree? And do you want to tell me something more about it?” (If the child
does not know)
• “I am given to understand that you have had some difficult experiences lately…I know it is hard to talk about
them and you may not feel ready as yet to talk about them…but there is no hurry. I am here every day and
we will be spending time together to play and do stuff…whenever you feel ready and comfortable, you can
tell me.” (If the child is silent)
• “Sometimes it is difficult to talk about issues…perhaps you can tell me later or I will ask again because I am
really worried…This is not about a complaint. It is about my concern and my worry that things might be
disturbing you.” (In case the child is silent and refuses to acknowledge the problem).
Establishing the context does not mean that a child should be forced to talk about the problem right away,
especially in case he/she is not ready to do so. But it still means that the mental health professional/ child care
111
service provider needs to allude to the problem in as much as he/she knows about it—because when the
mental health professional/ child care service provider and child are both silent about the problem, the child
is left wondering (sometimes over several sessions/ days) about why he/she is coming to meet the mental
health professional/ child care service provider and what the purpose is! So, while the mental health
professional/ child care service provider may lay the problem context in session 2 (and not in session 1), note
that this cannot be done in session 4 or 6—because a lot of time has gone by and the child is wondering what
these sessions and activities are for.
An extension of normalizing the phenomenon of getting help, this technique helps the child feel less
stigmatized or labelled; it is about conveying to the child that what happened to him/her or the problem
he/she has, has happened to others or been experienced by others—so that the child feels more comfortable
about talking about the problem or experience.
It helps the child to know that the mental health professional/ child care service provider has heard of this
problem before and so I am not going to be telling her something that is weird or shocking’.
Example:
“Like you, lots of children, who now live here (in the shelter) have left their homes and had difficult experiences.
So many children are sad and upset and need help with what they are feeling and experiencing. None of these
children, nor you, are bad people or crazy people.”
Universalizing children’s experiences should not come across to them as trivializing or minimizing their
experiences i.e. that ‘this happens to many children, so there is nothing special about you’! In order to ensure
this, it is also important to individualize the child’s experiences—to assure that child his/her experiences and
problems are unique and warrant a serious consideration.
Example:
“While many children may have gone through experiences and troubles similar to yours, your experience is still
different and special—and unique to your situation. Everyone needs help in different ways. I am here to
understand and support you.”
Thus, universalizing and individualizing the child’s experiences should be done in tandem as they are related
techniques.
c) Ensuring confidentiality
Children have the right to privacy. In order to build a relationship of trust with children, it is important to
assure them of confidentiality i.e. tell children that whatever they share with the mental health professional/
child care service provider, will not be told to the caregiver or others. However, confidentiality cannot be
absolute: it is not a matter of telling the child ‘I will never tell…no matter what…’ because a situation may arise
at some point, wherein the mental health professional/ child care service provider needs to disclose some of
the child’s issues usually in order to ensure the child’s safety or best interests. An example of such a situation
is child sexual abuse—a child may disclose about sexual abuse based on the fact that the mental health
professional/ child care service provider has assured confidentiality; but the mental health professional/ child
112
care service provider then finds himself in a position wherein he has to disclose the child’s report in order to
ensure that the child is safe and protected from abuse. If he discloses after giving absolute assurance of
confidentiality, the child’s trust will be broken and she will never want to work with the mental health
professional/ child care service provider again. So, how to assure a child of confidentiality in a manner
wherein the mental health professional/ child care service provider can negotiate a space in which to disclose
if ever necessary?
Example:
“I want you to also know that when we talk or play, whatever we share will be between us. I won’t tell anyone
about your feelings or upsets. If there is a time/ a need to have to tell some of it to other people like if I feel that
it is hurting or harming you in any way and that we need other people’s help to keep you safe or help you in
different ways, I will only do it after consulting you and getting your permission—never without. In acts, I will try
and ensure that you are there when I explain to your parents so that you can also speak or know exactly what I
told them.”
So, what is of key importance (as per the example) is the child’s permission. The mental health professional/
child care service provider assures the child of confidentiality but tells the child that he will only disclose
information if and when it is absolutely necessary—and that too, never without her permission. This means
that the mental health professional/ child care service provider will first discuss with the child what needs to
be disclosed, to whom and why and only if the child agrees, they will, together, plan how the information will
be disclosed (which parts to tell and to whom)—so that it is done in a manner that is comfortable to the child.
Note: We will return to a more detailed discussion on confidentiality issues in the context of mandatory
reporting when the child may want certain issues not to be disclosed to the legal personnel.
This technique refers to play and activities and further conversations that enable the child to feel relaxed and
comfortable with the mental health professional/ child care service provider. It is also a way to establish what
the child’s interests and hobbies are (such as art or story-telling, dance etc) so that these methods can be
incorporated into the counselling process i.e. used to work with the child in counselling and therapy sessions.
• Ask child neutral, non-threatening questions to elicit information about his/ her likes/ dislikes and
interests.
Example:
• “What did you eat today? What have you been doing all morning?”
• “Flip a coin: The mental health professional/ child care service provider and the child each choose ‘heads’ or
‘tails’ of a coin. When the coin is flipped, depending on what comes up, the person has to reveal a personal
detail i.e. if the mental health professional/ child care service provider chose ‘heads’ and heads comes up, she
must reveal a fact about herself; if ‘tails’ comes up, it is the child’s turn to reveal a fact about herself.
Example: “Blue is my favorite colour”, or “my favourite food is noodles”. You may gradually modify this to ‘let
us tell fun facts about ourselves’ or ‘what no one knows about me is…’ and elicit more personal details such
as ‘what makes me happy is…’ or ‘my favourite person is…’ or ‘who I miss most is…”
113
• “Alphabet pool: Having alphabets cut out from cardboard, each person draws from it and gives out one
information which starts with the letter drawn out. For example: B-“ I like to play ball” or S- ‘I love to sing’.
The facts or personal details revealed may gradually be used to talk to the child and ask more questions.”
• “Find out what the child is interested in and likes to do by way of hobbies—such as drawing, craft or reading
stories about particular topics."
Do an activity together…anything that interests the child and shows him/her that you are an ally.
Example:
• Play a board game and chat as you play
• Read a story together.
• Do a jigsaw puzzle.
• Draw and colour a picture.
Whatever you do, it needs to be a joint activity i.e. both mental health professional/ child care service provider
and child participate in it. Asking the child to draw a picture while the mental health professional/ child care
service provider watches is not a joint activity! Not participating in the activity and having the child alone do it
is more akin to instruction and children may feel nervous or as if they are being tested instead of a feeling
that the mental health professional/ child care service provider is a friend, a person who is ‘on their side’.
Materials: None
Process:
• Ask participants to get into pairs. In each pair, one is to assume the role of the mental health
114
115
Concept
The adult world is often too busy with its coping processes and too distressed to listen to children’s
experiences. It is critical to listen to the stories of children and understand it from their perspective.
Listening encourages the child to share his difficulties and enables us to better understand how to help.
Appropriate Body language: Body language and postures are non-verbal communications that
speak/express information about the behaviour, interest/disinterest, attitude of the mental health
professional/ child care service provider towards the child. Hence, it is important for the mental health
professional/ child care service provider to be conscious of his/her body postures and language as it can
affect communication.
The following are suggestions for maintaining appropriate body language while interacting with children:
➢ Maintain an attentive yet relaxed sitting posture. Avoid casual postures like slouching/drooping in the
chair. Behaviours like yawning can hint disinterest towards the child’s experiences and sharing,
resulting in interrupting the counselling process.
116
➢ Avoid fidgeting around while the child is speaking. For example: the mental health professional/ child
care service provider must avoid shaking the feet, fiddling with pens, mobile, nails, and fingers. This
interrupts the counselling process as it suggests anxiety and lack of confidence. As a result, the child
might withdraw from sharing with the mental health professional/ child care service provider.
➢ Avoid writing or making notes, and completing procedures as they can hint disinterest and also
distract the counselling session.
➢ Maintain eye contact with the child when the child is speaking; nod your head. This expresses interest
and genuine concern towards the child.
➢ Avoid using your mobile during a session—if it is urgent and you really must attend the call, ask to be
excused for a moment, go outside the room and take the call.
➢ Remember that a child needs to feel that you are truly interested in his/her narrative—good listening
in itself can be powerful in healing; when a child is heard (which is rare for most children), he/she feels
that his/her experiences are being respected and acknowledged.
Method: Game
Material: None
Process:
• Divide into pairs. One member of each pair leaves the room and one stays in.
• Round 1: Group that is outside (when they re-join their partners) to talk for a minute
continuously about some very important event in their lives to their partners. Instruct
the group inside to sit with their fingers blocking their ears i.e. not to listen to their
partners talking.
• Round 2: Group outside to talk for a minute about some very happy event in their
lives to their partners. Instruct the group inside to look away, not make eye contact,
not respond and act as if they are not listening.
• Round 3: Group inside and outside to talk non-stop to their partners. Neither should
listen.
• Round 4: Group outside to share some very difficult experience in their lives with their
partners. Instruct the group inside to be attentive, make eye contact, and express
emotion.
Discussion:
• How the group outside felt during each round of the game?
• Various levels of listening i.e. from not listening at all (1) to ‘hearing’ without listening
(2) to talking so much that there is no listening (3) and finally active listening (4). In
which round is good communication taking place? Why?
• How to communicate to a child that you recognize & acknowledge his/her emotions.
Concept
Take another example—one where a child has lost his mother. If the child were to tell the counsellor that he
was very sad, the worst response a counsellor could give is to say ‘don’t be sad...after all, we are here for you’.
While the intent may be to comfort and support the child, there are some issues with this response:
- How can a child not be sad after the loss of his mother? (after all, a 50-year-old adult also cries when he
loses his 80-year-old mother and that is considered legitimate!);
- Why should a child not have the right to feel or express emotions?
- Would telling the child not to be sad make the child feel better or worse—because he feels judged for
expressing his feelings?
118
- If the child does not feel reassured or comforted, then the purpose of counselling is lost—and so is the
relationship of the counsellor with the child because the child will not trust the counsellor to
understand his feelings.
The skill of recognizing and acknowledging emotions comprises of two parts: the first is to identify the
emotions that the child may be feeling; and the second is to legitimize the feelings or emotions that we
have identified. When children describe events in their life, the very first thing to do is to recognize what
they are feeling and acknowledge that for example: ‘…when that happened, you must have been very sad
and upset…you might have been angry too…’ This will then assure children that you not just understand
but empathize with their predicament - that in itself helps children feel supported and comforted (and is
one of the main objectives of counselling). The idea is to be one with the child’s emotions. Share in the
happiness, grief, sorrow or feeling that is being expressed. Do NOT judge the emotions expressed (even if
they are seemingly negative emotions). Remember that emotions are neither good nor bad. Never tell
someone how they should feel!
Material: Picture cards (refer to the picture cards provided in ‘Additional sheet Materials at the
end of this module).
Process:
• Divide participants equally into groups.
• Provide one picture card to each team.
• Instruct participants, to view the picture card and identify the emotion that this child may be
feeling.
• Following this, request them to come up with a 2- minute story, what may have happened to
cause the child to feel the emotion in the child’s voice. (e.g., “Today I was …I felt…”)
• Upon completion, ask each group to narrate their stories in plenary.
Discussion:
• It is important to ask children about their experiences than to assume from their facial
expressions…
• We must enter children’s inner worlds, to understand their emotions.
119
Process
• Play the video and ask the participants to observe the interaction between the professional
and the child.
Discussion:
• Ask them: what were the emotions of the child?
• How were the emotions recognized by the professional?
-
Materials: Children’s narratives (available in ‘Additional Materials’ at the end of this module).
Process:
• Divide participants into pairs and ask each pair to select any 1 or 2 cases (depending on
time availability).
• Read each of the children’s narratives (below) and do the following:
o Identify and list the emotions expressed in each narrative.
o Develop a verbal response to the child’s narrative that indicates that you recognize and
acknowledge the emotions felt by the child. In other words, when the child has spoken
those sentences, what will you say immediately? Or what would you say next?
Note: Your response should not be more than a couple of sentences; No long-drawn-out
explanations, no suggestions or advice or provision of solutions! No expression of intent either (‘I will
say…’)—say what you would say imagining that the child is sitting in front of you! Focus only on
validation of emotions and experiences and the age of the child while framing your responses.
(Hint: Use the emotions you have identified/ listed to frame the sentences for the response).
Discussion:
• When the participants have completed their discussion in pairs, ask them to share their
responses in plenary, for each narrative.
• Invite the group to critique the emerging responses (is the response validating emotions or
is it providing help and advice? Would the child feel understood and comforted?)), to make
additions and suggest alternative ways of responding.
120
Concept
To accept someone and to be non-judgemental is perhaps the hardest counselling skill of all, to practice.
What does being judgmental mean? It means to take a position on an issue or action based on what you
think is right or wrong; in other words, being judgmental also means to take a critical position on someone or
something in a manner that may also be condemnatory, disapproving, or negative.
Children are exceedingly sensitive and easily able to sense when they are being judged. If a counsellor
appears judgmental or disapproving, the therapeutic alliance (relationship between child and counsellor) is
weakened or adversely affected because the child feels that the counsellor is not on ‘my side’; consequently,
the child may no longer wish to continue communication with the counsellor i.e. he/she may refuse to engage
in further interactions. Children with conduct and behaviour problems, such as children in conflict with the
law, tend to be particularly difficult to establish rapport and trust with because they have been frequently
judged at home, in school and virtually everywhere they go. As such, they have developed an identity of being
a ‘bad person’. So, when the counsellor is judgemental, it only reinforces what they already believe and is
unlikely to get them to be trusting of the counsellor and open to reflection and behavioural transformation.
However, does this then mean that we should not take a position when an adolescent sexually abuses a
young child or when an adolescent murders someone? Absolutely not. Being non-judgemental does not
mean that we remain neutral by condoning violence or abuse. As counsellors, we believe that children and
adolescents must be held responsible for their actions. But does accountability mean that they have to be
belittled, rejected, harangued and sermonized to? This would not be in the realm of counselling and would
certainly require no skill to communicate in this manner (and most adults are already good at this way of
dealing with children!). Holding a child accountable for his/her actions without being judgmental means
presenting or framing the child’s action as the problem, not the child or person as the problem i.e. making the
difference between the person (who may be intrinsically good) and the person’s actions which may have had
problematic consequences (and which require reflection and evaluation).
121
No
Activity: Judgemental vs Non-Judgemental Attitude
w,
Material: Video Clips (QR code for the video clips provided at the end of this module). we
all
Method: Video clip viewing and discussion hav
e
Process and Discussion: opi
nio
-View each of the 3 videos ns,
-In which one is the child care worker judgemental/ non-judgemental? vie
-Why do you think so? wpo
-What do you think are some of the elements of being judgemental/ non-judgemental? ints
-What do you think will happen next in the judgemental scenarios? In the non-judgemental and
scenarios? posi
- tion
s on
Activity: Reflecting Upon Personal Biases and Opinions
vari
ous
Method: Group Discussion
mat
Material: Issue-based matrices (provided in ‘Additional Materials’ at the end of this module) ters,
incl
Process and Discussion: udi
ng
Divide into sub-groups.
oth
Engage in discussion as follows:
er
Your (own) personal views and opinions and common public beliefs and opinions about the issue(s)
peo
mentioned
ple’
-If a child had this issue and you responded from a perspective of your personal views and beliefs,
s
or common judgmental beliefs - what would the impact on the child be?
acti
ons.
Discussion:
Havi
-What happens when we use personal beliefs/ viewpoints in our discussions with children? ng a
-Will they help children change their behaviours…or…? pers
-We have the right to hold our personal beliefs/ viewpoints…but can we impose them on others? onal
Why/why not? opi
-The meaning of non-judgemental attitude in counselling practice? nio
judgemental scenarios? n or
posi
tion
is
cert
ainly not wrong. We are all entitled to have them. But imposing our personal opinions on others is not good
counselling practice—doing that is akin to instruction and advice, which are not the same as counselling.
Non-judgemental counselling (and indeed counselling itself) thus entails:
• Recognizing and acknowledging a feeling/emotion—WITHOUT being judgmental about whether that
feeling is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’.
122
• NOT giving your personal opinion in a way that is critical or blaming in any way.
• Allowing for children to express their opinion and viewpoint.
• Providing space wherein their opinions and actions can be examined so that children have an
opportunity to reflect on them—based on which they can make (more informed or thoughtful)
decisions about their lives and actions.
• Acting as a sounding board, not giving your opinion expecting the child to follow it).
This is not to say that the counsellor cannot present his/her views at all. The counsellor can present options
and alternatives (especially as the child may not be aware of all the possibilities that exist) but these must be
done in a neutral manner and again, they need to be placed before the child for his/her consideration.
Ultimately, it is the child’s life and therefore the child’s right to select which option he/she would want to
follow or what position or action he/she wishes to take—the counsellor is only facilitating the process, not
making the decision.
The examples below use a framework that we call the window approach to working with adolescents on
issues of sexual decision-making. The life skills series on ‘Relationships and Sexuality’ developed by the
SAMVAD- NIMHANS, a rights-based approach to sex and sexuality, implementing the activities on the
premise that adolescents are at a developmental stage wherein they have love-romance-sex needs and that
they have the right to have these needs met. However, the issue is how they make decisions about meeting
their romantic and sexual desires—and these decisions cannot be made randomly or whimsically. The series
has thus developed what is called a ‘window approach’ to provide a framework for decision-making through a
stage-by-stage discussion, also akin to opening each (new) window of thought. When we want to talk to
children and adolescents about abuse, we do not directly speak about abuse—because not only is it a
sensitive issue with which children can be uncomfortable, but also a complex one and one that is hard,
particularly for younger children, to understand. A window approach therefore allows for discussions to
gradually proceed, so that knowledge and understanding on relevant and related themes are transferred
sequentially.
We start with (acknowledgement of) love/ attraction and physical pleasure, it moves on to examining and
understanding concepts of privacy, consent and boundaries; learning about health and safety; and finally to
consider relationship contexts (roles and expectations of others, and activities we do with various people by
virtue of our relationship with them). Adolescents learn to use each window and concept individually and then
collectively to arrive at decisions about sex and sexuality behaviours.
But before getting into the details of the framework, first let us examine our own perspectives on adolescent
sexuality…what do you think…? [Engage in a discussion with the participants]
• Adolescents have no sexuality/ sexual needs or rights.
• They may have sexual needs but no rights; they cannot gratify needs.
• They have sexual needs and rights and are allowed to gratify them.
[Many participants often respond from socio-cultural contexts that are against sexual intimacy before marriage/
in adolescents. Some of the reasons for their viewpoints are ‘adolescents are not physically and emotionally
ready…’, ‘they are not mature enough at this age to make decisions about love and relationships, so they should
not engage in sexual relationships…’, ‘this is the age to be studying and doing other things—if they get into
relationships, they will not concentrate on school and academics…’]
Let us enter into some more discussions (use gentle humour to challenge some of the emerging thinking!):
123
• What is the ‘right’ age for love? If 15 is too young, what about 20? 40 years? 90 years is too old then??
(Encourage participants to name the ‘right’ age).
• How do we know that love at age 15 is not ‘real’ love?
• When people make decisions at age 30 to fall in love and enter a relationship, have many of these
relationships not broken? What does that say about adult decisions then?
• Many of you are married and presumably in sexual relationships…so, because you are in a sexual
relationship, does it mean that you are not performing other roles and responsibilities in your
life…such as going to work, taking care of family etc?
• Let us return to the age issue…most of you feel that individuals below the age of 18 (in accordance
with the law), cannot give consent and should not enter into sexual relationships. If I am 17 years old
today, and tomorrow is my birthday i.e. I turn 18 at midnight, can I run out and have a sexual
relationship? [Participants usually disagree with this]. Why not? Legally, I am permitted to do so…why
can’t I then?
What we are essentially saying then is that sexual decision-making is not, or not entirely, an age issue. There
are several other issues or factors we need to consider when making decisions about sexual intimacy. So, with
adolescents too, decisions are not about ‘yes’ or ‘no’—in answer to questions about whether or not to engage
in sexual intimacy. Some of us come from an adolescent sexual rights position i.e. we believe that adolescents
have the right to engage in sexual relationships. But this is not absolute—this does not mean that adolescents
can have sex whenever, wherever, with whomsoever they choose. We would still ask the questions when,
where, with whom, under what circumstances—and these are the questions to consider for adolescents (or
anyone!) while making decisions regarding sexual intimacy.
Thus, based on the above, the framework for sexual decision-making is as below—and requires to be used
when working with adolescents on such issues (explain):
“There is nothing wrong with feeling love and attraction for someone…everyone does and love and physical
intimacy are wonderful…they are important aspects of human life. We cannot deny
the need for love and sexual intimacy—and must make space in our lives for them. The question is can we set
aside everything else (such as education, everyday activities and life plans) and only focus on love and sex?”
2. Privacy
“What does privacy mean? Why do windows have curtains? Why do we close the door and take a bath? Where
can we engage in sexual activity? There are public spaces such as parks, market places…can you think of some
private spaces? Are Facebook and other social media public or private spaces? It is not that it is wrong to put
certain type of (intimate) pictures there…but once you put a picture out there, do you have any control over who
sees it i.e. your privacy? Can we control what some people may think and act if they see a certain kind of
picture?
For instance, if a girl puts a picture of herself in a sexual position with her boyfriend, some of us may think it is
her right to do so and think no more of it; however, some of her male classmates may see it and think...? That if
she can do that with that guy, then why not me? What if they then approach her and coerce her to do the
same…? While many of us are supportive of women’s rights and women’s safety, and believe that women should
be able to wear what they please and go out at any time, in the confidence that they won’t be harassed, what
are the realities of the world we live in?”
124
“What does permission and consent mean? In what situations do we ask for permission? For instance, if I want to
enter your room, how do I do so? If I do not knock or ask, and I walk right in, how would that make you feel?
What happens when consent is refused and we still go ahead and do something…whether we take someone’s
belongings or enter their space…? It is likely that there will not be much trust or respect or liking left in a
relationship where people feel coerced. Violence is an extreme form of force or coercion…what are others?
Suppose you asked someone out for a movie and he says ‘no’ and you buy tickets and tell him that he must
come…? When he continues to refuse, if you say (in a sweet tone of voice)— ‘please, please…aren’t you my
friend? Don’t you love me? If you really loved me, then you would come…’ would this be a form of coercion? So,
not all use of force is angry or violent; it can be done in ways that are softer, but it still means coercion—when
one pushes a person to do what he/she does not want to do. And when we coerce someone, we are breaking
boundaries...”
4. Relationships
“Who is the person that one is considering having sexual intimacy with? Is it a young child—in which case it
may be problematic because it is not possible for a young child to give consent…since she does not understand
sexuality issues. (There are also laws against sexual engagement with children).
Is it someone within the family… like an uncle—and that may also be difficult, considering boundary issues/
family relationships? Is it a friend—if so, how long have and how well have you known him/her? How do we get
to know people and establish trust…? What are your plans/ expectations of the relationship and what are his/her
plans and expectations?”
6. Abuse
“When a person engages with another person, without taking into consideration the issues discussed above i.e.
he/she does not take into account issues of privacy, goes against consent, uses coercion and breaks boundaries,
disregards relationships.”
Finally, as we use this framework through the processes of reflection and engagement this framework entails,
an adolescent (or any person) might arrive at completely different decisions regarding sexual engagement:
one person might decide to engage sexually only within the context of a marriage, in which case issues of
privacy, consent and health-safety still matter; another person might be more liberal and decide that sexual
intimacy is ok as long as there is a relationship context and commitment; a third may decide that a one-night,
casual encounter is acceptable. But whatever the decision and the context, the factors discussed are
applicable—for a ‘happy, healthy, responsible and safe’ sexual engagement. All four components need to
be addressed in adolescent sexuality education—sex education programs in school often leave out the
emotional and relational context of sexuality, focusing only on the biological and physiological issues (i.e.
health risks). Such approaches are incomplete and ineffective as they end up in preaching abstinence—is that
realistic? —and/or presenting sexuality from a negative (disease) perspective only—is that what sex is? Is that
a fair perspective?
125
Furthermore, we need to make a distinction between our personal viewpoints and opinions and the
counselling process with the adolescent. We are entitled to hold our beliefs and opinions, whatever they
might be, pertaining to sexuality and sexual behaviour. However, these beliefs and opinions come from our
personal life experiences—which may be completely different from the life experiences of the child you are
assisting. It would therefore be problematic for us to impose our beliefs and opinions on the child—who
needs to make his/her decisions based on his/her experiences. We are only there, through the use of the
above frameworks, to facilitate and guide the child as he/she develops certain ideologies or makes sexual
decisions.
The above framework is applicable to anyone (not just an adolescent), who is making decisions about sexual
engagements. In other words, sexual decision-making is actually a life skill, to be used whether one is aged 15
years, 45 years or 65 years! The beauty of this framework is that it can be used with:
- Adolescents who have not been sexually abused (for awareness on personal safety and abuse prevention
purposes)
- Adolescents who are victims or have been sexually abused (in order to be able to understand and
recognize abuse and thereby prevent it or report it in the future i.e. personal safety in the future)
- Adolescents who have violated boundaries and manifested sexual abuse behaviours (so that they
understand what constitutes abuse and why, and can make decisions not to engage in such behaviours).
We will now use the approach to provide a brief first-level response to the child—this is part of the practice of
non-judgmental attitude. [Discuss one example and then do the activity so that the participants can attempt
to use the frameworks discussed in the example].
126
Material: None
Process:
- Divide participants into pairs; one participant assumes role of child and the other that of
counselor.
- Ask each pair to select one situation (from below) and conduct a conversation with the child in
the following ways:
-Round 1: What would the counselor say/ how would the session proceed if the counselor
was being judgmental?
-Round 2: What would the counselor say/ how would the session proceed if the counselor
was being judgmental?
* Ask the participants to imagine that the other steps in counseling have been completed i.e. rapport
building, recognition and acknowledgement of emotions etc. They need to now talk to the child about
the problem at hand—how would they do that without being judgmental?
Discussion:
- Request some of the pairs to step forward and do their role play in plenary.
- Discuss what they felt was the difference between being judgmental and non-judgmental.
Invite the rest of the group to share feedback and comments on the conversation/ interaction…was
the counselor able to be non-judgmental? If so, how? If not, how?
Statements
- 16-year-old boy sexually abuses a 6-year-old girl (your client is the 16-year-old boy).
- 16-year-old girl has run away with a 25-year-old and dropped out of school.
- The same 16-year old girl wishes to continue with the pregnancy she now has as a result of
her relationship.
128
Concept
While interviewing a child, it is necessary to ask questions, whether they are questions pertaining to events or
the child’s thoughts and feelings or actions and decisions. But what is the difference between an inquiry
conducted by a mental health professional/ child care service provider versus one conducted by the police?
[Ask participants what they think]. Both are inquiry processes. But they differ in their purpose and in their style
of questioning (and response). How so? [Ask participants what they think].
For the mental health professional/ child care service provider’s inquiry not to be like a police inquiry, there
are certain ways of asking children questions. Also, the mental health professional/ child care service
provider’s interview is not one long question-answer session with the mental health professional/ child care
service provider asking question after question and the child having to answer each question. The inquiry
process needs to be embedded within the counselling process; in other words, the mental health
professional/ child care service provider needs to also provide responses (recognizing and acknowledging the
child’s emotions, for instance) during the course of conversation with the child.
Now, there are two types of questions: open-ended and close-ended questions.
Have you ever done a survey? What kind of questions does a survey contain? Usually they are close ended—
which means that a question can have only one possible, specific response like ‘yes’ or ‘no’; even where there
are multiple options for answers, the respondent is allowed to select only one or select more than one from
the options presented i.e. he/she cannot give a detailed descriptions of other responses he/she may have to
the question. For example, a survey question may ask ‘does your child get enough food to eat?’ and the
answer option are ‘yes’ or ‘no’; or ‘what are the causes of child malnutrition?’ and the answer options may be
‘dirty water’, ‘poor sanitation’, ‘inadequate quantity of food available’…but if the respondent has other views
on causes of malnutrition, there is no room to express them.
What do you observe from the interaction in the above example, where only close-ended questions were
used? A lot of information on the event and the child’s experience might get left out…because the questions
are coming solely from the mental health professional/ child care service provider’s perspective and
assumptions, based on what he/she thinks may have happened, but much more or very different things may
also have happened. For instance, ‘he behaved badly with me’ may have included not just sexual touching but
physical violence too but the mental health professional/ child care service provider assumes that it means
only sexual touching; the mental health professional/ child care service provider’s asking whether he touched
the child in her private parts leaves out the possibility that he may have touched her in other parts or even
that he may have done other things to the child.
The limitation of close-ended questions is that they do not help explore what happened in a detailed manner
or encourage the child to talk about all the aspects and dimensions of his/her situation. Children are unlikely
to tell you what happened or how they feel unless you create a space for them to do so—close-ended
questions do not create this space and allow for information to come freely from them. Also, children (already
used to adult, hierarchical ways of communication) are afraid to tell you the whole story and/or they think you
don’t want to know or that is all you want to know i.e. if you don’t ask, they won’t tell.
130
This is not to say that close-ended questions should never be used. They are certainly useful and necessary—
when specific information needs to be elicited such as time, place and name of person, for these can have
only one answer—when, where, whom? The point is to use close-ended questions, but to a lesser extent
with children, and in ways that will not block further information/ response.
These types of question lead to elaborate answers that do not end in one word. They help to explore How
and Why issues, thereby eliciting detailed, descriptive information from the child.
From the example above, what do you observe from this interaction where open-ended questions were used?
Open-ended questions encourage the child to give his/her perceptions, opinions and viewpoints so that the
counsellor is better able to understand events and issues from the child’s perspective. Instead of merely
getting concrete factual information, the counsellor is also able to glean what the
child felt. When exploring children’s experiences of trauma and abuse, it is more useful to use open-ended
questions in order to gently encourage the child to talk about difficult experiences.
Again, as mentioned, we are not suggesting that close-ended questions should never be used or that only
open-ended questions must be used at all times. Both types of questions are valid and should be used. It is
about the purpose of use i.e. what type of information a particular question is trying to elicit—if it is very
specific information about place/time/person, where only one answer is possible, then close-ended questions
must be used; but if the purpose is to detail out and event and understand how a child felt or responded,
then open-ended questions are more useful. The counsellor’s skill lies in how to use the two types of
questions, in combination, in an interview with a child—and in how to intersperse the questions with
responses that are reassuring to the child rather than a one-way conversation wherein the counsellor asks
questions and the child has to answer.
131
Method: Game
• In plenary, read each question aloud to the group and ask them to:
• State whether the question is open or close ended (for the initial responses, you can ask the
group to state why).
• If it is a close-ended question, to convert it into an open-ended one and vice-versa (if it is an
open-ended question, to convert it into a close-ended one).
List of Questions
• *Note: Some are trick questions! They cannot be converted, for, if they are, the
information they are seeking cannot be elicited. So, remind the participants that the questions
have to be converted in such a way that the nature of the information sought should not change.
For example, ‘when did these events happen’ cannot be converted into an open question—as the
question is seeking a very specific answer i.e. time. So the answer can only be morning/ evening
or at 6:30 pm a very specific answer i.e. time. So the answer can only be morning/ evening or at
6:30 pm etc.
132
Paraphrasing:
This is a skill of summarizing the content shared by the child to ensure and confirm that the counsellor has
not misinterpreted or missed out any information provided by the child. This helps avoid incorrect inferences,
conclusions and judgments being made by the counsellor. The child is also reassured that he/she has been
understood. However, summarizing in this case does not mean merely repeating what the child said—it
entails re-phrasing what the child along with:
• Recognition and acknowledgement of emotions to provide reassurance.
• Reflecting back the child’s feelings about the experience.
• Saying something additional—to provide the child with hope and encouragement
Example of Paraphrasing…
Counselor: “It seems like he touched you on your private parts and made you really uncomfortable and
scared. It was a difficult situation to be in…But you managed to scream for help and run away, despite
being scared—and that shows quick thinking and presence of mind. I am glad you told me about this
incident…”
Sounds really scary. What happened next?
As you can see from this example, the mental health professional/ child care service provider is not just
repeating the child’s story; he/she is also acknowledging her emotions and validating her difficult experience.
However, she is taking her response one level further to provide the child with a sense of confidence—by
attributing certain qualities to her (quick thinking…). Also, she is encouraging the child to be open and talk
further by telling her ‘I am glad you told me…’
133
Process
• Divide participants into pairs; one participant assumes role of child and the other that of
mental health professional/ child care service provider.
• Ask each pair to select one child (brief) narrative/sentence (from below) and elicit
information on the child’s issues and circumstances with the child’s narrative as the
beginning of the mental health professional/ child care service provider’s inquiry and
counselling.
For example, the child says ‘I do not feel like playing or doing anything’.
How would the mental health professional/ child care service provider continue
o
from this point on?
• Ask participants to elicit the child’s story in the following ways:
o Round 1: Use only close-ended questions.
o Round 2: Use both open and close-ended questions.
o Paraphrase what the child said.
Discussion:
• Request some of the pairs to step forward and do their role play in plenary.
• Invite the rest of the group to share feedback and comments on the use of the
questions.
• Discuss what hat they felt was the difference between using open versus close-ended
questions.
• Was the paraphrasing done adequately? (In the manner discussed above?)
•
134
• Be honest. Tell the truth. However difficult it may be and contrary to what we
believe children do have the capacity to understand. They can cope with it. Do not tell
children that dead people will return someday.
• Never give false reassurances. While always providing a sense of hope for the future,
do not reassure children that their situation will magically change or tell them
definitively that people they left behind will come. False reassurances could cause
children to lose their trust in you.
• Do not decide for children. Provide information, discuss and resolve problem along
with children; help them assess options and make decisions.
• Avoid getting upset with them. Remember their emotional state.
• Never refer to any child as ‘the child who lost his/her mother/father…’ because
then that will become his/her whole identity rather than retaining and asserting
his/her own identity, thereby blocking the healing process.
• Be careful how you use physical touch. Hugs and caresses are comforting for
children. However, be careful how you use them. Some children may have a history of
sexual abuse and may not appreciate this- in fact, they may feel very threatened.
Hence, use touch only after you have established a rapport with a child.
• Avoid giving material rewards and comforts. These are only short-term ways of
providing comfort. Focus on spending time playing and providing emotional care,
warmth, affection. Children appreciate this more.
• Be culturally sensitive. Children can be from different socio-cultural backgrounds
from that of the mental health professional/ child care service provider, hence be
accepting and nonjudgmental of the child.
• Do not criticize. Criticism threatens children and causes them to shut down
communication. Children often behave and react based on their understanding and
experiences of a particular situation. Focus on understanding the context and
experiences of the child.
• Do not force the child to communicate and provide information. Particularly in
cases of sexual and physical abuse, but also in relation to other traumatic experiences,
children must be comfortable and share information at their own pace.
• Do not order. Avoid telling children what to do and how to do. Gentle suggestions
are welcome but allow children to decide for themselves through a process of
discussion.
• Be well-informed about other available resources and services. Know what other
community services and resources are available to children and provide information to
them and their parents.
135
Suggested Readings
▪ Cloitre, M., Chase Stovall-McClough, K., Miranda, R., & Chemtob, C. M. (2004). Therapeutic alliance,
negative mood regulation, and treatment outcome in child abuse-related posttraumatic stress
disorder. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 72(3), 411.
▪ Zorzella, K. P., Rependa, S. L., & Muller, R. T. (2017). Therapeutic alliance over the course of child trauma
therapy from three different perspectives. Child abuse & neglect, 67, 147-156.
▪ Jensen, T. K., Haavind, H., Gulbrandsen, W., Mossige, S., Reichelt, S., & Tjersland, O. A. (2010). What
constitutes a good working alliance in therapy with children that may have been sexually
abused?. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 461-478.
▪ Gustafson, K. E., & McNamara, J. R. (1987). Confidentiality with minor clients: Issues and guidelines for
therapists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(5), 503.
▪ Hutchby, I. (2005). " Active Listening": Formulations and the Elicitation of Feelings-Talk in Child
Counselling. Research on language and social interaction, 38(3), 303-329.
▪ Hutchby, I. (2002). Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: aspects of the utterance ‘I don't
know'. Discourse studies, 4(2), 147-168.
▪ Whitcomb, S. A. (2017). Interviewing techniques. In Behavioural, Social, and Emotional Assessment of
Children and Adolescents (pp. 155-190). Routledge.
▪ Ulvik, O. S. (2015). Talking with children: Professional conversations in a participation
perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 14(2), 193-208.
▪ Yoon, H. S., & Templeton, T. N. (2019). The practice of listening to children: The challenges of hearing
children out in an adult-regulated world. Harvard Educational Review, 89(1), 55-84.
▪ Paley, V. G. (1986). On listening to what the children say. Harvard educational review, 56(2), 122-132.
▪ Warshak, R. A. (2003). Payoffs and pitfalls of listening to children. Family relations, 52(4), 373-384.
▪ Noiseux, J., Rich, H., Bouchard, N., Noronha, C., & Carnevale, F. A. (2019). Children need privacy too:
Respecting confidentiality in paediatric practice. Paediatrics & child health, 24(1), e8-e12.
▪ Hodgkin, R. (2001). Children and confidentiality. The British Journal of General Practice, 51(466), 422.
▪ Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Olivari, C., Sorum, P. C., & Mullet, E. (2014). Minors’ and adults’ views about
confidentiality. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 9(2), 97-103.
▪ Larcher, V. (2005). Consent, competence, and confidentiality. Bmj, 330(7487), 353-356.
▪ Lambie, J. A., Lambie, H. J., & Sadek, S. (2020). “My child will actually say ‘I am upset’… Before all they
would do was scream”: Teaching parents emotion validation in a social care setting. Child: Care, Health
and Development, 46(5), 627-636.
▪ Sorin, R. (2003). Validating young children's feelings and experiences of fear. Contemporary Issues in
Early Childhood, 4(1), 80-89.
▪ Shenk, C. E., & Fruzzetti, A. E. (2011). The impact of validating and invalidating responses on emotional
reactivity. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 163-183.
▪ Denham, S. A. (2007). Dealing with feelings: how children negotiate the worlds of emotions and social
relationships. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behaviour, 11(1).
▪ ross, J. T., & Cassidy, J. (2019). Expressive suppression of negative emotions in children and adolescents:
Theory, data, and a guide for future research. Developmental Psychology, 55(9), 1938–
1950. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000722
136
Additional Materials
For Activities ‘Rapport Building’, ‘Recognition on Acknowledgment of Emotions’, and ‘Judgmental vs
Non-Judgmental Attitude’.
137
Children’s Narratives for Activity ‘Skill-building for Recognition and Acknowledging Emotions’
A, age 6: “I do not want to go to school any more. That ‘bhaiya’ took me to a dark room and did bad things to
me. It hurts here [pointing to anal area]…”
P, age 15: “Ever since he did those bad and dirty things to me, I feel really stressed. I keep thinking about
them. Smoking marijuana and drinking alcohol help me forget about all that bad stuff.”
J, age 16: “If I ever see him again, I will kill him…I want to do something that will get him into trouble. It’s just
not fair that nothing happens to him, while I have to suffer.
M, age 14: “I feel scared all the time…I cannot eat, I cannot sleep…if I try to close my eyes, I see images of that
man—he is coming towards me and I know he is going to hurt me.”
S, age 15: “My 25-year-old cousin came to stay with us for a holiday. When my family was in another room, he
said he loved me and he kissed me and put his hands inside my blouse and touched my breasts. I did not like
it; he has gone back and is not in contact with me. I don’t know what to do.”
D age 14: “I feel dirty and damaged…like no one could ever want me or love me ever again. I hate myself
too…I should have done something to stop him, stop it from happening…”
T, age 11: “I tried to tell my mother but she did not believe me. She said I was a ‘dirty girl’ for saying such
things about my uncle. She told me never to talk about these things again.”
Issue-Based Matrices for Activity ‘Reflecting Upon Personal Biases and Opinions’
Issue 1 Your personal The Child you are Impact on the child if
beliefs/ opinions dealing with you communicate
about the issue? your beliefs and
opinions ?
Gender and Dress Girl wears short dress
and goes out with
friends; she gets
sexually assaulted.
Issue 2 Your personal The Child you are Impact on the child if
beliefs/ opinions dealing with you communicate
about the issue? your beliefs and
opinions ?
Gender and Girl who is engaging in
Substance Use smoking & drinking
alcohol.
Issue 3 Your personal The Child you are Impact on the child if
beliefs/ opinions dealing with you communicate
about the issue? your beliefs and
opinions ?
Boy has sexual
Adolescent’s relationship with
Engagement in classmate; he has run
Sexual Relationship away with her.
140
Time
2 Hours
Concept
Before a professional enters the process of eliciting evidence, it becomes important that the child is assessed
by the professional in the context of their developmental histories and lived experiences. After the incident of
sexual abuse, there may be adverse physical, emotional, behavioural, and mental health consequences. The
time right after the abuse is not the time to start enquiry about the abuse, neither is it a time to provide depth
interventions. The first steps must involve assessing the child’s mental health, understanding their context or
the context in which abuse has occurred and providing some first level responses (reassuring the child of
safety, giving the child comfort and hope, allowing the child to rest and relax). A child who is experiencing
extreme anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or other mental health consequences after the abuse,
might not be ready to engage in a conversation about the abuse incident and may not be ready to provide
evidence. This may affect the quality of evidence and may even aggravate the symptoms / issues that the child
may be experiencing post the abuse incident.
A psychosocial assessment of the child at an earlier stage which also captures the context of abuse, medical
history or evaluation reports, child’s history and details about family, abuse disclosure and then the sudden
onset of emotional, behavioural and mental health issues in the child that may indicate trauma and abuse, may
also form part of the evidence. These may be not be definitive indicators of sexual abuse, but can certainly
support the evidence elicited later by the mental health professional. (recall the index of suspicion)
A psychosocial assessment therefore is not only important for enabling diagnostic conclusions, making
decisions about treatment and interventions but is also important formulation a care plans, making placement
decisions, eliciting evidence/ forensic interviewing and the provision of testimony in the court later. In a
nutshell, a thorough assessment is critical for understanding the nature, breadth, and impact of child sexual
abuse experiences and other trauma exposures.
The initial assessment begins by eliciting information about child’s basic demographic details, facts about the
abuse incident, changes in the emotional behavioural patterns of the child post abuse, social history including
details about the living arrangements, family and caregivers, school, and information about any previous abuse
incidents etc. Once the professional gets the basic facts it allows the professional to move forward.
141
State Vs Trait
State emotions refer to those that are in response to the immediate situational context while the trait emotions
are personality characteristics and refer to the ways in one sees the world. In each child or a group of children
when you see the child, the child may be in a certain state they could be equanimous, crying, angry and sullen.
It is important to assess and find out that how much of these traits are part of the child’s personality and how
much of these consequences of abuse. Some children may have trait or state anxiety both. The children who
have trait anxiety may be more vulnerable or prone to abuse as they may not necessarily have some essential
and critical life skills life skills such as refusal skills, assertiveness skills, ability to cope with stress, ability to
regulate emotions etc. While some other children may not have any trait anxiety, but they may develop state
anxiety after abuse incident.
It is also important in assessment to find out about the nature and severity of the abuse which includes finding
out whether the abuse was a single incident or if there have been multiple incidents of abuse, if it has been
perpetrated by a single perpetrator or if there have multiple such experiences with multiple perpetrators, if the
abuse has been contact or non-contact, genital or non-genital, penetrative or non-penetrative. This has
implications not only assessing the mental health impact on the child and their treatment but also for legal
purposes. The quantum of punishment also would depend on the nature and severity of the abuse. In many
cases of child sexual abuse there may also be a compounding of the crime – there could be physical injury,
threatening and violence by the perpetrator, child labour trafficking etc.
Using Finklehor’s traumagenics model a systematic understanding of the effects of child sexual abuse can be
developed. Four traumagenic dynamics--traumatic sexualization, betrayal, stigmatization, and powerlessness--
are identified as the core of the psychological injury inflicted by abuse. These dynamics can be used to make
assessments of sexually abuse children and to anticipate problems to which these children may be vulnerable
subsequently. (Refer to the details provided in the chapter on ABCs of child sexual abuse to understand more
about Finkelhor’s traumagenics model and the traumatic impact of child sexual abuse)
Assessment of Impact of Trauma on Developmental Trajectory of Child
The experiences of childhood trauma such as that of abuse can also have affect the development of a child or
derail their development trajectory. It may lead to developmental delays or impairment in one or multiple
areas of functioning such as social/ inter-personal, emotional, behavioural, cognitive. The professional may
assess the child post abuse for issues in the following areas of functioning - responsiveness, attentiveness,
attention, level of executive functioning, memory dysfunctions, emotional regulation, developmental
regression and academic problems or sudden onset of learning difficulties.
An important factor in the reporting of abuse, child’s treatment and recovery would be the nature of the family
system that the child is a part of. It becomes important during the assessment to understand the role of family
in the child’s life and the level of support provided by them to the child. While assessing the family system one
may look at the following:
142
Different families may have different kinds of reactions to the abuse incident. The reactions may also depend
on whether the abuse has taken place within the family or outside the family (by a stranger, in the school etc.).
While one family may react with a supportive approach and tell the child that the abuse should not have
happened and now that it has happened they will be with the child and do the best to manage and handle all
the difficulties he or she is facing, there could also be another family that does not believe and may make
blame the child for the abuse, they may transfer the blame to the child by saying things like “we had warned
you or asked you to not go there…now see what happened because you did not listen” or “you must stop
watching all the nonsense …you mind has become too dirty, you don’t think twice before saying something”
“you are too sensitive…your uncle must have joked, he cannot ever do this” “are you sure this happened? Do
you not think about your family before saying or doing the things you do?”. While some families may believe
but may get into a severe state of shock, the family environment may become full of sadness and grief, there
may be absolute silence in the family as if mourning someone’s death and then the child’s inner voice may
become that “I am responsible for all this” therefore contributing to the child’s problems. On the other hand,
some families may get angry or may talk about the abuse incident too much making it the single most
important thing that has happened in the child’s life.
Families are complex systems. The dynamics within a family system also determines the role they will play or
the level of support they will show during the reporting/recovery process. Therefore, during the assessment
process it becomes critical to find out about the dynamics within the family i.e., if there is a history of violence,
alcoholism, marital discord within the family, divorce, separation, neglect by the parents (physical/ emotional),
abuse, permissiveness, overprotectiveness, unpredictable parenting etc. The family because of their own
issues, preoccupations and maladaptive patterns may not be ready to provide support to the child.
In these kinds of families, it would become important to address the maladaptive patterns and interactions,
changing the emotional atmosphere, addressing the issue of unequal power dynamics within the family.
No parent/ caregiver/ adult ever expects that their child will be sexually abused and therefore the disclosure of
abuse by the child puts them in a state of shock as they are not prepared to deal with the disclosure and often
times do not know what to do. Finding out about child sexual abuse therefore can be a very overwhelming
experience. The abuse incident may lead to the feelings of failure, shame, guilt and even anger in the parents.
These feelings may result from the thoughts such as – “I am a bad parent,” “How could I not keep my child
safe?” “Oh! my child did not feel comfortable enough to come and tell me that all this was happening to
them.”
These thoughts may then affect the ways in which the parent responds to the child’s trauma. While the child
may need parental support and reassurance that although the abuse has taken place, it is in no way the child’s
fault and they will be there to support and assist the child in handling and managing the difficulties the child
has been experiencing. However, these preoccupations with being a bad parent, compromise their abilities to
provide reassuring responses. In fact, the child may sense their sadness, which may further give rise to inner
voices such as “It is because of me now that my parents feel very sad” “My parents are in distress because of
me” “My parents are so nice, they work so hard and they always care about me but I always create troubles for
143
them.” These responses and the thoughts further aggravate the problem and hinder the treatment/ recovery
process.
In this case therefore, it would be imperative to work with the family and prepare them to provide hopeful
reassurances to the child and support the child through the treatment process while managing their upset.
It is always important to remember that asking the right kind of questions is critical in order to elicit
information about the incident and about the child’s mental state. This may be uselful for the mental health
professionals or child care service providers in order to understand what had happened and consequently, the
impact it has had on the child’s mental health. It is always best to not bombard the child with too many
questions about the abuse. One may start with some general questions and open ended questions then move
towards more specific questions about the abuse to understand the context of the child, family issues and
dynamics, nature of abuse, the grooming process used by the perpetrator in a non leading may be non-
leading. Refer to the framework on abuse enquiry in the chapter on eliciting evidence to learn more about
leading and non-leading questions, issues related to suggestability and tutoring. The context in which sexual
abuse occurs is important in the assessment process. Recall from the chapter on communication skills, the idea
is to hear the child out and elicit more narratives. If the details and nuances are missed during the assessment,
it also will affect the prognosis and recovery.
Some ways of asking questions questions in a graded manner, using a windowed approach:
Assessments must also include finding out about the child i.e. who this child is? what are their life
experiences? are there any pre-existing psychiatric conditions? is there any kind of disability? what kind of
family system does the child have? have there been any life events such as loss of a parent, accident,
illness, bullying before the incident that have resulted in internalizing or externalizing problems? has there
been a cumulative adversity i.e. other than the sexual abuse? how many emotional and behavioural
symptoms are actually a result of the previous traumatic incidents? what are some of symptoms seen in
the child after the abuse incident?
Remember, the context in which abuse has happened is very important for assessment and for treatment.
144
During the assessment process it is important to enquire that the child has been medically examined. The
primary aim of the medical examination is to address the health and wellbeing of the child after the abuse
incident. A secondary purpose of the medical examination is to collect forensic evidence for police and court
proceedings in a timely manner.
The children as was explained earlier may come to the medical professional / mental health professional/ child
care service provider in the following contexts –
• When the abuse has been reported and the FIR has been filed.
• When the disclosure has not been made by the child and the child has come for assistance in context of
either internalizing issues like anxiety, school refusal, dissociation etc. or sudden behavioural issues
In scenario one, since the reporting is done- check if the child has been medically examined after the reporting
was done in compliance with the protocols and standard operating procedures laid down in conjunction with
the POCSO Act. Add all the reports and medical documents of the medical examination as evidence to the
child’s file for court processes later.
In case the medical examination has not been completed because the disclosure was made for the first time
during the consultation, in compliance with the protocols of the POCSO Act, 2012, immediately ensure that the
child is referred and medical examination is done and all necessary medical assistance is provided to the child
i.e. to ensure that there are no injuries, infections, post-exposure prophylaxis are given. Again, document all
the processes and attach the reports of the medical examination in the case file.
*Note- In case the abuse had taken a while ago for e.g. 2 years ago or 7 months ago, in that case medical
examination will not be useful as the evidence would have been lost due to a significant time gap between the
occurrence of the incident of child sexual abuse and reporting of the abuse.
Enquire during the assessment process whether the reporting of the sexual abuse incident has been done i.e. if
the police, child welfare committee or the district magistrate have been informed. In case, the reporting has
not been done work with the child and the family and inform them about the mandatory reporting provision.
Follow the eight steps explained in the chapter on mandatory reporting. Remember, mandatory reporting is a
process.
It is also important to make decisions about how soon the reporting should be done based on the level of risk
and vulnerability for example, whether the child has been sexually abused home and the perpetrator continues
to abuse the child versus the abuse happened eight months ago by a neighbour when the child visited
grandmother’s house in another city for a vacation. In the first situation the risk is immediate, in case the
reporting is done immediately the abuse may continue while in the second case abuse the perpetrator has no
access to the child and the abuse was a one-off incident, therefore some time before the actual reporting is
done as there is no immediate risk to the child’s safety. Safety and the protection of the child should be the
primary concerns. Refer to the framework mentioned in the mandatory reporting chapter to understand more.
145
It is also important to make a note of the status of reporting in the case file and in case the reporting has not
been done, the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider should explain
and record the steps taken by them to enable the reporting process.
Material: SAMVAD-NIMHANS’s proformas and SOPs/Guidelines (All the materials to be used for
this activity are attached at the end of this module in the Additional Materials Section)
Process:
• Take prints of the Individual assessment proforma and the standard operating procedures for
implementation of POCSO, guidelines for identifying abuse and maltreatment in child care
institutions.
• Ask the participants to read through the proformas. Give about 20-25 minutes to the
participants to go through the proformas.
• Once the participants have gone through the proforma, take them through the proforma and
the accompanying Standard Operating Procedures and Guidelines.
Discussion:
• Allow the participants to ask questions and seek clarifications parts or points from the
proforma which are unclear to them or require further explanation.
146
Method: Script development (suggested scripts provided at the end of this chapter)
Process
• For each question ask the participants to develop simple questions that they will use to elicit
information. Ask them to think of the age of the children they work with and use the
communication skills.
• Tell them they have to tell what will they exactly say in order to elicit this information- ‘the
dialogue’
Discussion:
• Explain that while younger children may be able to give some information, they may not be
able to answer all questions. Therefore, it may be necessary and useful to elicit this information
from the parents for corroboration.
While the school or teachers cannot be the primary source of information as they do not spend the amount of
time that children spend with their caregivers and therefore may not be aware of the child’s situation/
problems accurately, but they certainly are in position to observe behaviours and emotions that may result
from trauma due to the sexual abuse experience. A mental health professional therefore may strengthen the
assessment by requesting for a teacher’s school report focus on the following:
147
Weight change: sudden gain Clothes appear extremely tight or loose, change in type of
or loss of weight wardrobe (i.e., usually wears fitted clothes but begins to
wear only loose-fitting clothes)
Behavioural Regression: returning to Younger children may return to sucking thumbs, older
previous developmental children may regress to temper tantrums or exhibit
behaviours extreme separation anxiety from caregivers
Changes in play: play Child who normally plays freely with different toys now
patterns shifting to repeated plays solely with the blocks (building and knocking them
play behaviours, role playing down again and again), or does not play and instead sits
of the traumatic event, or alone, or assigns roles to other children or dolls to play out
restriction of play event
Social isolation: withdrawal Chooses to sit alone, does not talk to others during breaks,
from normal social network avoids social interactions; quitting extracurricular activities
Risk-taking: increase in Hearing about child having unprotected sex, trying drugs,
behaviours that may cause abusing alcohol
harm to self or others
Bids for attention: acting in Suddenly becoming an overachiever or underachiever,
a way to draw attention, acting out to draw attention
through negative or positive
actions
Increased aggression Yelling, becoming upset quickly, inability to stop
aggression
148
Suggested Readings
▪ Nader, K. (2011). The assessment of associated features important to understanding childhood
trauma. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 4(4), 259-273.
▪ Kellogg, N., & Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. (2005). The evaluation of sexual abuse in
children. Pediatrics, 116(2), 506-512.
▪ Horvath, M. A., Davidson, J., Grove-Hills, J., Gekoski, A., & Choak, C. (2014). It's a lonely journey: a rapid
evidence assessment on intrafamilial child sexual abuse.
▪ Laajasalo, T., Korkman, J., Pakkanen, T., Oksanen, M., Tuulikki, L., Peltomaa, E., & Aronen, E. T. (2018).
Applying a research-based assessment model to child sexual abuse investigations: Model and case
descriptions of an expert center. Journal of forensic psychology research and practice, 18(2), 177-197.
▪ Turner, D., Rettenberger, M., Yoon, D., Klein, V., Eher, R., & Briken, P. (2016). Risk assessment in child
sexual abusers working with children. Sexual Abuse, 28(6), 572-596.
▪ Murrie, D., Martindale, D. A., & Epstein, M. (2009). Unsupported assessment techniques in child sexual
abuse evaluations.
▪ Cameron*, H. (2005). Asking the tough questions: a guide to ethical practices in interviewing young
children. Early Child Development and Care, 175(6), 597-610.
▪ Wolfe, V. V., & Gentile, C. (2013). Psych ological Assessment of Sexually Abused Children. In The sexual
abuse of children (pp. 143-187). Routledge.
▪ Perrin, S., Smith, P., & Yule, W. (2000). Practitioner review: The assessment and treatment of post-
traumatic stress disorder in children and adolescents. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
and Allied Disciplines, 41(3), 277-289.
▪ D'Andrea, W., Ford, J., Stolbach, B., Spinazzola, J., & Van der Kolk, B. A. (2012). Understanding
interpersonal trauma in children: why we need a developmentally appropriate trauma
diagnosis. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 187.
▪ Gabowitz, D., Zucker, M., & Cook, A. (2008). Neuropsychological assessment in clinical evaluation of
children and adolescents with complex trauma. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 1, 163-178.
▪ Briere, J., & Spinazzola, J. (2005). Phenomenology and psychological assessment of complex
posttraumatic states. Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for
Traumatic Stress Studies, 18(5), 401-412.
▪ Briere, J., Johnson, K., Bissada, A., Damon, L., Crouch, J., Gil, E., ... & Ernst, V. (2001). The Trauma
Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC): Reliability and association with abuse exposure in a
multi-site study. Child abuse & neglect, 25(8), 1001-1014.
▪ Wilson, J. P., & Keane, T. M. (Eds.). (2004). Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD. Guilford press.
▪ Courtois, C. A. (2004). Complex trauma, complex reactions: Assessment and treatment. Psychotherapy:
Theory, research, practice, training, 41(4), 412.
150
Additional Materials
Proformas and SOPs/ Guidelines to be used for the discussions as part of Activity ‘Let us look at some
proformas…’
151
152
Standard Operating Procedures for Incorporating Child Psychosocial & Mental Health Care Aspects
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/SOP-for-POCSO-NIMHANS.pdf
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Medical-Investigations-for-Children-in-
Institutions_1.pdf
https://www.nimhanschildproject.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Identifying-Trauma-and-Abuse-in-Child-
Care-Institutions.NIMHANS-Guidelines.pdf
**Show the assessment report after all the proformas have been discussed.
153
Submitted by:
Agency XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Date XXXXXXXXXXXX
Sample Report
154
1. Background
2. Objectives
The specific objectives of the visit were:
• To conduct mental health and developmental assessments for affected children in order to screen for
mental health morbidity and ascertain the psychological impact of child sexual abuse (CSA).
• To use the developmental and mental health assessments to ascertain the child’s capacity to provide
evidence/ testimony as child witness.
• To assist investigative officers to interview and gather evidence from the children, using sensitive and
child-friendly methods of interviewing.
• To provide first level responses to trauma and identified mental health issues, on an individual basis as
well as to draw up recommendations for mental health and rehabilitation focussed interventions.
Table 1: Children Interviewed by NIMHANS Team: Locations & Numbers, September 2018
Dates Child Care Institution Location No. of Children Evaluated/
Interviewed
Total
a) Screening for Mental Health Morbidity and CSA Impact in Developmentally Normal Children
Psychiatric assessments were conducted with each child, individually, to identify serious and impairing
sequelae of trauma –such as self-harm behaviours, incapacitating anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD) symptoms. NIMHANS assessment proformas and protocols developed especially for assessment of
children in care and protection (child care institutions) were used to not only identify mental health problems
arising from recent abuse experiences but also to identify pre-existing mental health vulnerabilities and/or
developmental problems, that would also need to be addressed during the course of treatment. This proforma
was also used for interviewing children having speech and hearing impairment but no intellectual disability.
(See Annexe 1 for proforma used).
155
In all, out of the total of 45 children, the mental status examination of 30 children could be assessed in detail
(i.e. those without moderate to severe intellectual disability and/or severe mental illness). Although not strictly
speaking neuro-typical, 3 children with speech and hearing impairments and 2 children with mild intellectual
disability were included in this group: the former group had no cognitive impairments/ intellectual disability
and could therefore respond to the assessment and interview questions using special techniques; the latter
had very mild cognitive impairments, and adequate speech and communication skills, thereby they were able
to respond to the assessment questions.
b) Assessing Children with Moderate to Severe-Profound Intellectual Disability and Severe Mental
Illness
Of the 45 children,15 children (most of whom were listed in the YYY document as having some form of
disability) had varying levels of moderate to severe/profound intellectual disability and/or severe mental illness;
these children were also reported on this list as being unable to provide statements for Section 161 and 164.
The following two scales were used to assess the nature and severity of intellectual disability in these children:
• Developmental Screening Test (DST): This is used for measuring mental development of a child in terms
of neurological and integrative behavioural implications, language and personal-social behaviour items.
It is used as a tool in semi-structured interview with child and parents. It provides 88 behavioural items
presented at appropriate age levels. Scores obtained on these items with IQ calculator are used to
assess the level of development in the child.
• Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS): This scale measures the differential social capacities of an
individual. It provides an estimate of Social Age (SA) and Social Quotient (SQ), and shows high
correlation (0.80) with intelligence. It is designed to measure social maturation in eight social areas:
Self-help General (SHG), Self-help Eating (SHE), Self-help Dressing (SHD), Self-direction (SD),
Occupation (OCC), Communication (COM), Locomotion (LOM), and Socialization (SOC). The scale
consists of 89 test items grouped into year levels.
Further, information on the children’s abilities and functionality were also obtained from the institution
caregivers’ observations and experiences of the children over the past few months.
For those children with severe mental illness, accounts of the child’s level of functioning and observed
behaviours were elicited from the caregivers of the institution, followed by mental status examinations (MSE)
of the child. For those with severe mental illness, intelligence could not be assessed in view of their mental
illness (that prevented the children from responding to the assessment scales and would have yielded
inaccurate observations on the same).
Note: The ages of the children on the format reflect the ages provided on the YYY list (containing the Section 161
and 164 statements), as the NIMHANS team was given to understand that these ages were medically determined.
A comprehensive assessment report has been developed for each individual child and submitted to the YYY;
each report contains the following information:
- Child’s background (how the child reached XXXXXXXX shelter, previous family history, educational
history)
- Emotional and mental health concerns and/or developmental disabilities
- An account of her abuse experiences (evidence as applicable—where child was able to provide it)
- Psychiatric diagnosis
- Care plan (for mental health assistance and rehabilitation)
- Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness
156
Table 2: Developmental & Psychiatric Issues in XXXXXXXX Shelter Home Children, September 2018
Mental Health/Disability Diagnosis No. of Cases
Emotional Disorder (NOS)
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Depression and other Mood/Emotional Regulation Issues
Social Anxiety Disorder
Severe Mental Illness (Organic Mood Disorder/ Psychosis)
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Intellectual Disability Borderline intellectual functioning—Mild
Intellectual Disability
Moderate/Severe/Profound Intellectual
Disability
Speech & Hearing Impairments
*A given child may have had more than one diagnosis; only 2 children had no psychiatric diagnosis.
As shown in the table 2 above, in all 43 children had one or more psychiatric disorders or intellectual disability.
Only 2 children, who stayed at XXXXXXXX shelter home for an extremely short duration, just before the
institution was closed and the children removed, and who also did not have significant/ adverse family history,
had no psychiatric problems. All psychiatric diagnoses are made according to international classificatory
systems, i.e.; International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision (ICD-
10) and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5thedition (DSM-5).
Adjustment Disorder is the clinical diagnosis made for several of the affected children as they have faced long
term stress events, namely abuse and trauma, and they had emotional and behavioural issues pertaining to
trauma and abuse experiences. (See box below for description of Adjustment Disorder with Predominant
disturbance of other emotions.
157
• States of subjective distress and emotional disturbance, usually interfering with social
functioning and performance, and arising in the period of adaptation to a significant
life change or to the consequences of a stressful life event (including the presence or
possibility of serious physical illness).
• The stressor may have affected the integrity of an individual's social network (through
bereavement or separation experiences) or the wider system of social supports and
values (migration or refugee status). The stressor may involve only the individual or
also his or her group or community.
• Individual predisposition or vulnerability plays a greater role (young age can be a
vulnerability) in the risk of occurrence and the shaping of the manifestations of
adjustment disorders than it does in the other conditions in F43.-, but it is nevertheless
assumed that the condition would not have arisen without the stressor.
• The manifestations vary, and include depressed mood, anxiety, worry (or a mixture of
these), a feeling of inability to cope, plan ahead, or continue in the present situation,
and some degree of disability in the performance of daily routine. The individual may
feel liable to dramatic behaviour or outbursts of violence, but these rarely occur.
However, conduct disorders (e.g. aggressive or dissocial behaviour) may be an
associated feature, particularly in adolescents.
• The onset is usually within 1 month of the occurrence of the stressful event or life
change, and the duration of symptoms does not usually exceed 6 months, except in the
case of prolonged depressive reaction (F43.21). If the symptoms persist beyond this
period, the diagnosis should be changed according to the clinical picture present, and
any continuing stress can be coded by means of one of the Z codes in Chapter XXI of
ICD-10.
The symptoms are usually of several types of emotion, such as anxiety, depression, worry,
tensions, and anger. Symptoms of anxiety and depression may fulfil the criteria for mixed
anxiety and depressive disorder (F41.2) or other mixed anxiety disorder (F41.3), but they are
not so predominant that other more specific depressive or anxiety disorders can be diagnosed.
This category should also be used for reactions in children in which regressive behaviour such
as bed-wetting or thumb-sucking are also present.
The inquiry regarding children’s experiences of sexual abuse were embedded in the larger mental health and
psychosocial interview conducted with each child individually. The Investigative Officers (IOs) of the YYY were
present for this component of the interview. As agreed with the YYY officials in the initial brief, most questions
regarding their experiences in the XXXXXXXX shelter were put to the child by the NIMHANS team, with the IOs
asking for additional information and clarifications as required, including conducting photo identifications of
the alleged perpetrators, with the children. Thus, the NIMHANS team assisted the YYY investigative officers to
interview and gather evidence from the children, using sensitive and child-friendly methods of interviewing. As
detailed below, specific protocols and specialized methods were used, to interview children, depending on
their developmental and communication abilities.
158
a) Adaptation & Use of Guidelines for Establishing & Inquiring about Child (Sexual) Abuse in Child Care
Institutions
In August 2018, when the child sexual abuse incidents in XXXXXXXX shelter home came to light, the Dept. of
Women and Child Development, Government of Karnataka requested the Dept. of Child & Adolescent
Psychiatry to develop guidelines and methods to identify and establish abuse in child care institutions. It was in
response to this request that ‘Establishing & Inquiring about Child (Sexual) Abuse in Child Care Institutions’
guidelines document was written. Developed for monitoring child safety issues in institutions, it can also be
used to conduct inquiry where abuse is suspected or reported. These guidelines were slightly modified and
adapted to fit the context of the XXXXXXXX shelter home abuse case and used for interviewing children about
their experiences of abuse within the shelter home.
*Refer to Annexe 2 for guideline document on ‘Establishing and Inquiring about Child (Sexual) Abuse in Child
Care Institutions’ (adapted for use in XXXXXXXX Shelter Home Case ZZZZ)
Note: Although contained in the guideline, levels 3 and 4 of inquiry were not used in the interviews (since they
entail institution staff who were not necessary (or available), in this instance, for discussion).
b) Use of Non-Verbal Interviewing Methods with Children having Speech & Hearing Impairment
The children with speech and hearing impairment had not been schooled or trained in any formal sign
language practices. Thus, conventional and usual gestures as well as art and dolls, were used to establish
communication with them in the following ways:
• The team used gestures to introduce themselves to the child, including their objective of protecting
her. Gestures were used to communicate that there would be a conversation in which the child can
participate only if she is willing to i.e. there would be no pressure or coercion.
• The child would then be shown plain paper and colour pencils, some dolls and a file containing
photographs of the perpetrators, indicating that any or all of these could be used by the child and the
team to communicate/ express themselves.
• To obtain the child’s background/ details on home, a drawing of a house was used along with gestures
of a house (inverted V using arms) and pointing at the child and gesturing small size (when she was
small).
• The team waited at every stage, for the child’s gestures of response—and taking cues from that would
ask further questions using gestures.
• Family figures were drawn—sometimes begun by the team and completed by the child. The child
would also use actions to indicate certain events such as running away or train journeys.
• To distinguish between child’s home and the XXXXXXXX shelter home: the child’s home (already
established through drawing or gesture), a firm shaking of head and crossing of arms was done to
show ‘no, not your home’; parallel gestures first pointing to the child and then to the children outside/
around were made, making gestures for a larger home and using gestures for far away. The child then
re-affirmed that she had understood these gestures, by repeating the gestures, that they were referring
now to the XXXXXXXX shelter.
• With reference to the XXXXXXXX home, the first prompt used was the hand gesture to indicate
question. The team would wait for the child’s response to this—if the child enacted crying or slapping
of the face, punching, the question prompt was used again.
• Primarily, the prompt from the team was the question gesture; upon receipt of response from the
child—either through gestural enactments or drawing/ art (or a combination of both), and in some
instances the child also used dolls to show actions on it. When the child’s response ceased, the team
would replicate (imitate) the child’s responses exactly, to confirm what she was trying to
communicate—through vigorous nods of the head.
• Similarly, the child was shown the photographs of the perpetrators and inquiry was conducted in terms
of whether she could identify them and what actions they engaged in. In the course of the interaction,
the photographs were re-introduced two to three times, in random order, and the responses noted.
159
• In all gestural enactment, when the team replicated the child’s actions, care was taken never to touch
the child.
• During the course of the interaction, since children became very agitated, calming down activities and
de-briefing was used, primarily using drawing and colouring or jigsaw puzzles and doll play. Gestures
to communicate safety of the child and confidentiality were also used to reassure the child throughout
the session.
Assessment for psychiatric issues, to check the child’s daily functioning and emotional states were also done
through gestures and art work—primarily pointing at the child and using actions.
Many children were agitating to go home, and institution staff reported that children were engaging
increasingly in self-injurious behaviours due to their unmet demands to go home. The YYY had informed the
NIMHANS team that the children would be required to stay in the institutions until all evidence gathering
processes were complete and the necessary FIRs were filed, and that these processes might take up to two
months. The NIMHANS team conducted a brief group session with the affected children in one of the
institutions, to help them understand why those who had homes and wished to return were being retained—
simple explanations regarding legal processes and justice (which the children also desired) were provided;
motivational techniques were used as part of the discussion to provide them with perspectives on how a little
more time and waiting on their part could save many children’s lives/ keep other children safe.
4.4. Collaboration with (Tertiary Care Facility) for Referral & Further Mental Health Assistance
Following discussions with the YYY on the children’s needs for further mental health evaluations and
interventions (including psychiatric medication), the team also made a visit to TCF to initiate conversations with
the Dept. of Psychiatry, regarding possibilities of their providing continued mental health assessments to
children who are referred for further interventions. The Dept. of Psychiatry has agreed to assist those affected
children (assessed and referred by the NIMHANS team) requiring depth counselling and therapy, including
further evaluation on a medium to long term basis. The NIMHANS team will collaborate with the TCF team
providing them with all requisite training and intervention materials to work with child sexual abuse trauma.
An initial group of 9 children with severe and acute mental illness with medical and neurological co-morbidities
have already been referred to Dept. of Psychiatry, TCF. Another 17 children, requiring mental health
interventions, including further assessments, monitoring of mental health status, medium-to long term trauma-
focussed therapy for resolution of PTSD symptoms, including severe anxiety and self-injurious behaviours, will
be referred in the coming weeks; 6 children with intellectual disability will also require referral services for
psychiatric, neurological and paediatric evaluation. Thus, a total of 32 children have or will be referred to
TCF, SSSSS for mental health services.
Based on the affected children’s accounts, the following are some of the dynamics of how child sexual abuse
was perpetrated in the XXXXXXXX shelter home:
(i) Exposure of children to sex videos (some children have reported that they were shown such films by
institution staff, on mobile phones).
(ii) Coercion of children, by institution staff, to wear skimpy clothes and dance to ‘dirty’ songs while some of
the institution staff/ CWC members watched; perpetration of physical abuse and violence if children refused to
comply.
(iii) Engagement of some children, by perpetrators, in a gradual process of sexualizing the relationship over
time (i.e. grooming). Children, especially at risk children within care and protection systems/ child care
institutions, are particularly vulnerable to inappropriate manipulations and attentions. Children can recognize
the various benefits and rewards from compliant sexual participation. Thus, some children have been
inappropriately and prematurely indoctrinated to respond to their environments and significant others in a
sexualized manner—also known as the process of sexualisation.
(viii) Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA), wherein children were administered medication each night, telling
them that it was for de-worming purposes, following which children would fall ‘into deep sleep’, waking up
with body pains, particularly in the areas of chest, stomach, abdomen and vagina. [Note: De-worming
medication is not used on a daily basis—it is given, usually as a single dose, periodically to children, about
once in a few months; one or two doses per year is the World Health Organization’s recommendation].
Drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) is a criminal act that is carried out by covertly administering a
psychotropic substance to a person with the intention of impairing behaviour, state of awareness, perceptions,
degree of consciousness, judgement, decision-making capacity or anterograde memory. DFSA victims often
have ‘patchy’ memories or no recollection of what occurred while they were in an unconscious state.
DFSA predators have certain characteristics: they have access to sedating drugs and understand their effects;
they have access to a setting where rape will not be interrupted while in progress; they are able to establish at
least a small amount of trust with an intended victim. These characteristics are very much applicable in the
XXXXXXXX case: the child care institution was continually accessible to the staff/ CWC members responsible for
running it and whom the children trusted (or had to trust), since they were in the agency staff’s care and
protection; given the nature of the institution, there was also a doctor who was able to ‘legitimately’ provide
access to requisite drugs.
forgot what happened’—they are reluctant to disclose information about themselves or about the
abuse, as they are unsure whether the (next set of) caregivers are trustworthy and whether the
information they provide will be used against them. The trust issue is also what makes evidence
gathering a challenging task with such children—especially when time is limited and we are reliant on
cross-sectional assessments and evaluations.
A Exposure to a stressful event or situation (either short or long lasting) of exceptionally threatening or catastrophic
nature, which is likely to cause pervasive distress in almost anyone.
B. Persistent remembering or "reliving" the stressor by intrusive flash backs, vivid memories, recurring dreams, or by
experiencing distress when exposed to circumstances resembling or associated with the stressor.
C. Actual or preferred avoidance of circumstances resembling or associated with the stressor (not present before
exposure to the stressor).
(1) Inability to recall, either partially or completely, some important aspects of the period of exposure to the stressor
(2) Persistent symptoms of increased psychological sensitivity and arousal (not present before exposure to the
stressor) shown by any two of the following
c) Difficulty in concentrating;
d) hyper-vigilance;
Criteria B, C and D all occurred within six months of the stressful event, or the end of a period of stress. (For some
purposes, onset delayed more than six months may be included but this should be clearly specified separately.)
Posttraumatic stress disorder is the one of the few psychiatric diagnoses in DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 that requires
the presence of a known etiologic factor, i.e., a traumatic event that precedes the development of the disorder.
For PTSD to be present, the child must report (or there must be other compelling evidence of) a qualifying
index traumatic event and specific symptoms in relation to that traumatic experience. All children, in whom
PTSD symptoms were observed/ assessed, have provided accounts of physical and sexual abuse experiences
(in varying degrees of detail).
While diagnosis of PTSD symptoms requires evidence that children have experienced traumatic events, and
most neuro-typical children were able to provide details of their abuse experiences at XXXXXXXX shelter home,
4
Neuro-typical children are those who do not have intellectual and cognitive disabilities or autism i.e. they are individuals of typical
developmental, cognitive and intellectual abilities.
163
there were a few children who also tended to provide responses such as ‘I cannot remember’ and ‘I don’t
know’. Such responses are, in fact, evidence of PTSD (and consequently of trauma experiences) because these
children may be afraid, ashamed, embarrassed, or avoidant of disclosing traumatic experiences, particularly in
an initial clinical interview. Avoidance may take the form of denial of trauma exposure and as such may be an
indication of the severity of the child’s avoidance symptoms rather than lack of trauma exposure.
Furthermore, while most children had some PTSD symptoms, they were unable to report or respond to
inquiries regarding flashbacks, emotional distress after exposure to traumatic reminders and avoidance
behaviours. One possible reason for this is already explained above in terms of children’s difficulty with
emotional vocabulary and communication; another possible reason is what is known as ‘sleeper effects’ of
PTSD--whereby children are asymptomatic immediately after the abuse, but present with symptoms at a later
developmental stage. Thus, all PTSD symptoms could not be elicited in a single cross-sectional interview and
the affected children will require continued evaluation for PTSD over the coming months, by a psychiatric
facility.
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), the direct and deliberate destruction of body tissue in the absence of suicidal
intent, is the type of self-injurious behaviour that most children exhibited. Studies have found that NSSI, during
adolescence, is particularly associated with childhood sexual abuse—and also that the presence or frequency
of NSSI is not significantly associated with non-sexual abuse, including physical and/or emotional abuse.
Children who have been sexually abused tend to re-experience trauma, and feel the need to use avoidance and
numbing mechanisms, which would lead to NSSI behaviours.
Also, self-injurious behaviour, especially NSSI, although learnt and initiated in a particular context (during
experiences of trauma and abuse), are likely to continue even after the abuse has stopped. This is because
children who have suffered trauma have reduced affect or emotional regulation5 skills. They are at risk for
being more easily overwhelmed by emotional distress. They find it difficult to respond in a ‘balanced’ way,
within a moderate range of emotions: the slightest provocation, even if unrelated to the event may produce
extreme reactions characterized by excessive fear or anger. This is why the affected children continue to
engage in self-injurious behaviours and at times in aggressive/disruptive behaviours. Events of trauma and
abuse (especially when repeated or chronic in nature), not only have psychological impacts but also induce
physiological changes-- repeated childhood stress and trauma experiences lead to alterations in central
neurobiological systems leading to increased (mal)responsiveness to stress; this in turn increases the risk of
psychopathology in both children and adults.
5.5. Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness:
5
Emotional regulation refers to an individual’s ability to regulate or control difficult emotions such as anger and anxiety.
164
Based on the mental health and developmental assessments conducted, the report contains comments on
each child’s ability to provide valid and reliable evidence (including later on, in Special Court).
Children with intellectual disability in the moderate to severe range are unable to provide verbal or non-verbal
narratives of their abuse experiences as they lack the requisite developmental abilities, particularly with regard
to cognition and speech, and will therefore be unable to provide evidence. Likewise, those with severe mental
illness were also unable to provide evidence because the severity of the illness hinders cognitive functioning
and communication.
Among children who did NOT have (moderate to severe/ profound) intellectual disability it was found, that
most were able to provide accounts of physical and sexual abuse in the XXXXXXXX shelter. Children with
speech and hearing impairments also fall within the broader sphere of those not having intellectual disability,
and are consequently capable of providing valid and reliable testimonies, albeit through use of non-verbal
communication methods. While nearly all these children may have psychiatric diagnosis such as PTSD
symptoms, Depression, Adjustment Disorder with predominant disturbance of other emotions, or mood
regulation issues, these mental health problems, all consequences of chronic abuse and trauma, do NOT
preclude them from providing valid and reliable evidence.
That said, the same mental health issue may manifest in each individual child in a different way as there are
temperamental (innate) differences as well as variations in children’s previous life experiences in terms of family
background. Consequently, despite having similar diagnosis, each child’s reactions to the abuse and trauma
experiences, and therefore her response to the evidence gathering process is different. For instance, a child
who comes from a cohesive family, with secure attachment relationships and adequate care, may be more
resilient in the wake of her XXXXXXXX trauma experiences, and so more willing to provide detailed accounts of
the abuse, including the ways in which she personally experienced it. However, a child with a long standing
family background of neglect, compounded by the XXXXXXXX trauma experiences, is likely to have blunted
socio-emotional development, be less resilient, more anxious, more difficult to build trust with, and
consequently less likely to provide detailed evidence, especially in a brief cross-sectional interview.
Such variations have resulted in two types of children, in terms of their capacity to provide evidence, with
specific reference to the nature of evidence they provide:
i) Those who have the ability to provide valid & reliable (abuse) narratives and evidence about both events/
occurrences as well as experiences of the self-i.e. their evidence comprises of accounts of what used to happen
around them/ in XXXXXXXX shelter, what they observed in terms of events and others’ actions, as well as their
personal experiences of abuse/ what happened to the self.
ii) Complete ability to provide valid & reliable (abuse) narratives and evidence but with a focus on events and
occurrences rather than on self-i.e. their evidence comprises of accounts of what used to happen around them/
in XXXXXXXX shelter, what they observed in terms of events and others’ actions, but they are hesitant to
disclose abuse that they personally experienced—they either avoid discussing the abuse related aspects or
describe how it happened to other children, saying that it did not happen to them.
Table 3 below categorizes the 45 children that the NIMHANS team assessed and interviewed for mental health
and evidence gathering purposes, into 7 categories. The characteristics (in terms of functionality and ability) of
each category are described, along with the implications for evidence provision.
Table 3: Developmental & Mental Health Impact on Children’s Abilities to Provide Evidence
Category Characteristics Implications for No. of
Evidence Provision (by Children
Child)
Category 1 Children with Moderate to Severe and Profound Complete inability to
Intellectual Disability: provide (abuse)
• Cognitive capacities much below age narratives and evidence.
165
As stated in the initial Supreme Court order, it is strongly recommended that the Government of ZZZZ engages
3 accredited institutions i.e. NIMHANS, TCF, SSSSS and CCCC, to provide psychosocial, mental health and
rehabilitation assistance to the affected children in the manner described below.
Abuse-focused interventions to facilitate trauma resolution and long-term healing need to be implemented at a
later stage, when children have overcome the initial acute distress of sexual abuse. They also need to be
implemented by skilled and qualified mental health professionals who can effectively modulate the pace of
trauma-focused therapy, deal with obstacles like escalating distress and self-harm behaviours and prescribe
psychiatric medication as and when required.
Detailed individual mental health assessments of the XXXXXXXX children have shown that this may not be an
opportune time for group therapy. In fact, for highly sensitive issues such as child sexual abuse, group therapy
although used, is conducted after extensive assessment and preparation i.e. after understanding the children’s
readiness to participate in such sessions.
Furthermore, any therapeutic work that inadvertently leads to greater distress in children by re-traumatizing them
can unsettle children in the medium-term. This may also impact the children’s abilities to provide evidence in the
Special Court trial that will ensue in the upcoming two months. In other words, mental health assistance and
evidence are very much linked in the context of sexual abuse.
In the light of the above-described rationale, please find below our recommendations, made on the basis of
detailed mental health evaluations of individual children:
(i) NIMHANS has already had 2 meetings with the Dept. of Psychiatry, TCF, SSSSS. The TCF team is willing to
work in collaboration with NIMHANS to assist the children as necessary. The Dept. of Child & Adolescent
Psychiatry, NIMHANS is the only independent specialized child psychiatry department in the country and manages
cases of child sexual abuse on a regular basis. Thus, all therapeutic and training materials developed by NIMHANS
will be shared with the TCF team to better equip them to respond to the children’s needs and any support or
guidance whether through a visit or via phone will be provided by NIMHANS.
(ii) Referral letters have already been sent (on 5th October 2018) to TCF and to the Dept. of Social Welfare,
Government of ZZZZ, for an initial group of 9 children, with severe and acute medical and psychiatric needs for
TCF to provide urgent assistance to them. These are children with severe and acute mental illness, with co-morbid
medical conditions, requiring urgent psychiatric medication and/or medical and neurological care.
(iii) The mental health assessments conducted by NIMHANS, for each child, will be shared with Dept. of Psychiatry,
TCF SSSSS. These assessment proformas contain care plans and suggestions for further assessments, psychiatric
medication and psychotherapy in keeping with each child’s individual needs. Those children requiring further
mental health assistance may be referred to the TCF team, who will work with the children, providing necessary
mental health care and inputs.
(iv) After the initial round of emergency referrals already sent to TCF, NIMHANS will notify TCF about other
children who require medium to long term psychiatric and mental health assistance, including psychotherapy, and
further clinical evaluation and treatment for mental health disorders. As mentioned, these children will require
depth individual therapy, when they have overcome some of their current intense agitation.
Note: Liaising with TCF SSSSS, a local institution will ensure that regular and sustained care is provided to the
children over a longer period of time, as required (versus occasional visits by organizations not located within the
state—which will not be useful to the children).
169
At the time NIMHANS was contacted for assistance, based on the Supreme Court order, the NIMHANS team
requested the Dept. of Social Welfare, Government of ZZZZ, to send the reports of the work completed by the
NGO. This was in order for the NIMHANS team to be able to build on the work already initiated by the NGO,
rather than duplicate services already provided or contradict any messages the children may have received
through their prior engagements and participation in sessions with the NGO staff.
Upon studying the reports provided by the NGO, the NIMHANS team has noted several concerns about the nature
and type of interventions provided by the NGO—these are documented in detail in Annex 3 on ‘Issues and
Concerns regarding Mental Health Interventions by Other Agencies’. Based on these reports and the
understanding thereof, it is NOT recommended that non-governmental agencies (other than CCCC) engage in
interviewing children/ providing trauma-based therapy and other mental health assistance to the affected
children.
However, NGOs may be engaged under the guidance and supervision of CCCC to assist the affected children with
various rehabilitation activities (erstwhile described). Indeed, this would be both useful and critical as many NGOs
have specific mandates and skills in vocational training, non-formal education and other areas relevant to
rehabilitation.
The NNNN society, PPPPP, has the most suitable environment for the rehabilitation of the affected children. Upon
discussions with the caregivers and observations of the children, it is apparent that all the elements required for
the children’s initial healing and stabilization are present: 24/7 individual care, vigilance, structured daily routine,
caregivers and counsellor to assist with ventilation and validation of children’s trauma experiences, daily group
sessions that focus on generic life skills (not on issues of trauma).
Thus, it is recommended that as the environment and care there is structured in ways that assist children with
coping with extreme distress, thereby promoting readiness for depth therapeutic inputs (from TCF) at a later stage,
affected children from SSSSS and BBBB institutions be shifted to the PPPPP child care institution as follows:
• Those who do NOT have intellectual disability and severe mental illness (such as psychosis/organic mood
disorder i.e. those who are functional)
• Those who have speech and hearing impairments but do NOT have intellectual disability.
In all, about 17 children (5 from BBBB Balika Grih and about 12 from HHHHGrih, SSSSS) require to be re-located to
the children’s home in PPPPP. The capacity of the PPPPP institution is 50 children and they currently have 25
170
children only. The caregivers at this institution have expressed their willingness to house and care for all the
affected children (i.e. those without intellectual disability and severe mental illness), provided they are supported
with 5-6 additional staff housemothers/counsellors as per their requirement). It would be helpful if CCCC could
facilitate this process of re-location of children and additional staff for this home, along with the Government of
ZZZZ.
Note: Children who are placed in Asha Kiran Home, SSSSS do NOT require to be re-located as they have adjusted
to the institution set up there, and this institution, like the one in PPPPP, is able to provide the children with
structured daily routines, play time, opportunities for education etc.
6.4. Rehabilitation and Developmental Interventions for Children with Disability & Severe Mental Illness
The environment and care conditions in Balika Grih, BBBB are far from ideal. The caregivers appear to be over-
worked and under-skilled, as they care for a large number of children, most of whom have severe disabilities. It
would be useful if CCCC, in collaboration with the Government of ZZZZ, helped to (re)organize the institutional
care in the following ways:
171
o Staff orientation and training on children with disability (incl. approaches to working with children with
disability)
o Ensuring that the medical treatment is supervised/ that there is treatment adherence (also through enabling
access to a paediatrician and nurse for the institution).
o Organizing access to a physiotherapist, a speech therapist and special educator for the children.
o Helping the caregivers to organize a structured daily routine for the children; suggesting and organizing ways
meaningful developmental and stimulation activities that would be individualized for each child (in accordance
with her disability level)
Given that other agencies involved are keen to assist in the rehabilitation efforts, it would be useful to share
yesterday’s note as well as this one with not only the Hon’ble Supreme Court but also with the Dept. of Social
Welfare, ZZZZ, the YYY, and CCCC, all of whom are involved in this case in various capacities.
6.5. Repatriation
Repatriation of the children i.e. sending them back to their homes and families may also be undertaken by CCCC.
However, they will be able to commence efforts in this area only after the legal/ trial processes are completed
(based on direction from the YYY). This is likely possible after 2 months’ time.
The NIMHANS team will share the family history/ locations of the children’s homes with the CCCC team in order
that the latter may assist in the repatriation process through tracing of children’s families and decision-making as
to which children can return home (some of them cannot as they are either unable to tell the whereabouts of their
home or are not willing to go home due to neglect, abuse and exploitation that has occurred in the family
context).
Some issues for consideration and interventions for implementation during the process of repatriation:
• The decision to send the child back to her family needs to be based on i) the child’s wish at the time when
repatriation processes are initiated; ii) the ability of the family to ensure safety and developmental
opportunities for the child (a home study may be undertaken for this purpose).
• The issue of repatriation will therefore require some discussion and preparation with the child, so that she
is able to manage any questions that are asked of her whereabouts/ experiences when she goes home (if
unprepared for such questions and situations at home, it will create great anxiety in the child). For instance,
CCCC and institution counsellors would need to prepare the child for going home, and the questions
family members/ others may ask (‘where were you all these months? What were you doing there?). The
responses that the child could give may be scripted and rehearsed with the child: ‘I was in a children’s
shelter home…I didn’t like it there…people were not nice at all—they used to beat and hurt us…am relieved
to be out of there now.’ It should be explained to the child that there is no obligation on her part to
explain in great detail what happened to her at the XXXXXXXX shelter home etc—her comfort is
paramount, (unless she really wished to tell someone particularly close o important to her—the idea is not
‘you have to tell’ or ‘never tell anyone’—it is about the child’s comfort).
• The child’s parents/ family may also require to be prepared—at least to be broadly informed that the child
had difficult experiences in the previous institutions, that she sometimes recalls them and becomes
distressed. They need to also be told about some basic techniques to help her manage her distress/ soothe
her, should any distress symptoms occur when she goes home.
172
• The child should be enabled to continue treatment at TCF, SSSSS, (for any child who is undergoing
treatment there) even after she goes home—with support from her parents and assistance from Govt. of
ZZZZ.
In the light of the above, if the trial proceedings for the XXXXXXXX Shelter Home Case are conducted at the
Special Court in XXXXXXXX, where the children may have to make an appearance/ participate in some of the
proceedings, there is likely to be difficulties and challenges in terms of providing the requisite evidence. It is not
advisable to take them back to XXXXXXXX, the place that for them is associated with traumatic events as the
distress that the children will experience will hinder them from providing evidence; furthermore, as stated, due to
trust issues, there is likely to be hesitation and reluctance to travel to XXXXXXXX (for fear that they may be
returned to the shelter home there).
i. The Special Court trial proceedings for the case be located in a neutral location (such as SSSSS).
ii. The utmost care is taken when children are asked to identify the alleged perpetrators i.e. even the use of
one-way glass/ mirrors is inadvisable as the children are unlikely to respond, given the degree of fear and
trauma that they continue to experience. It is suggested that perpetrator identification is done through
pictures and/or videos only.
iii. Given their PTSD symptoms and the level of children’s fears, the NIMHANS team be permitted to prepare
the children for trial (nearer that time) in the following ways:
• Courage and confidence building
• Knowledge of court procedures (so children know what to expect)
These can be done through the use of creative methods such as art, story-telling and role play, in group sessions
with the children, shortly before trial procedures begin for them.
173
Note: Preparation of the children will in NO way include tutoring or telling children what to say in the court. The
focus of preparatory sessions will be purely on mental health/ psychological readiness to participate in trial
proceedings.
As the Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NIMHANS deposes in POCSO cases, in court, as expert witness,
should there be such a need in the XXXXXXXX case, the Head of Department, Dept. of Child & Adolescent
Psychiatry, NIMHANS, would be willing to undertake to represent the team and depose as special witness as
required.
174
Annexe 1
1. Basic Information
2. Presenting Problems/Complaints
3. Institutional History (where all the child has been /lived, for what periods of time, experiences and
difficulties, circumstances of coming to this agency)
5. Child’s Temperament and Personality (Caregiver’s description of child’s temperament and personality –
aggressiveness, sociability, attentiveness, motivation, emotionality…)
7. Work Experiences (Child labour experiences: why child had to work/ how child found place of work
(trafficking?)/where the child was working, hours of work, amount of remuneration received/whether this
was regular, any form of abuse encountered at the place of work/ how the owner and others treated child.)
8. Physical, Sexual & Emotional Abuse Experiences *(Ask Child/ Child’s report)
9.1. Anxiety
i) Look at the feelings thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how worried do you feel? (Mark it).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
175
ii) At which times do you feel really very worried? Describe when/in what situations.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii) At which times do you feel really very sad? Describe when/in what situations.
iii) Have you ever felt like life is not worth living/ you don’t want this life…? When? Tell me what you do at such times.
9.3. Anger
i) Look at the ‘feelings’ thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how angry (or irritable) do you feel? (Mark
it).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii) At which times do you feel really very angry? Describe when/ in what situations/ what do people do to make you
angry.
iii) What do you do when you feel very angry?
Psychiatric Diagnosis:
Medical Problem:
Context:
Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness:
12. Care Plan (List actions taken or planned by the assessment agency/ case worker to assist the child, such
as emergency actions/ measures to address immediate concerns, referrals made to other agencies/depth
work).
176
Annexe 2
Establishing and Inquiring about Child (Sexual) Abuse in Child Care Institutions
(Excerpt from Guidelines for ‘Identifying Abuse and Maltreatment in Child Care Institutions’ developed by
Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NIMHANS for Government of Karnataka)
Note:
The following questions for inquiry are to be used in conjunction with and after necessary developmental and
psychiatric assessments have been administered to affected children—so as to first understand and determine
children’s capacities to respond to the issues/ questions in this guideline.
• Pregnancy
• Sexually transmitted infections
• Genital injuries
• Physical injuries
For Neglect
• Skin infections and sores
• Appears dirty and has severe body odour
• Has poor dental hygiene
• Lacks sufficient clothing for the weather
• Signs of Malnutrition:
- Respiratory and other infections/ illness
- Skin is thin, dry, inelastic, pale, and cold
- Cheeks appear hollow and the eyes sunken, as fat disappears from the face
- Hair is dry and sparse
177
*Time-lines to be checked with child and in medical records, to establish whether these signs occurred during the child’s stay in the institution
or before admission to the institution.
- Tell me about how you spend the day…what activities do you do from the time you
General wake up…?
Questions - Tell me about the different rooms and spaces in your institution…where do you eat?
Where do you sleep? Where do you play/ do your homework?
- What time do you eat dinner? And what happens after that…? What do you all do?
- What are some of the things you like best about being in this institution?
- What are some things you find difficult about being in this institution?
- Tell me something about each of the caregivers who are in this institution…we can
178
name them one by one and you can tell me what they do here/ how they help you/
what activities each of them do with you…
- In many institutions, children help out and do things around the place…like some
chores related to cleaning and cooking. Tell me a little about what chores you do in
this place…or if you do chores in any other place too (although you live here).
- Has anyone forced you to do work/ chores that you don’t want to do? Tell me
about it…
-I see that (some of) you have hurt yourselves…I notice that you have marks on your
Questions arms/face…Can you tell me how these injuries happened?
about - Did you meet the doctor about these injuries? What did he/she say?
observable - (Some of) you look a little sad and afraid (or dull)…is there anything that make you
physical and feel sad/ afraid/ angry?
emotional- - Has anyone said or done anything that has made you feel upset or uncomfortable
behavioural during the time you have been here?
signs of - Has anyone forced you to do anything that you don’t want to do or that makes you
abuse uncomfortable? Tell me about it…
- Can you tell me names/ describe the people who hurt you?
- Have you any questions you would like to ask me? I am happy to respond to any
concern or question you may have…
-Have you noticed any injuries/ health issues in the children? Tell me more about
Questions it?
- Have you observed injuries?
- Have children reported any injuries/ health problems to you?
- Any sudden or unusual behavioural changes in the children? Sleep patterns/
feeding patterns/ socialization/ daily activity/ sudden onset of bed-wetting?
- What measures have you taken to help children access treatment for injuries/
health problems and/or psychological problems?
- Have children reported any misbehaviour to you about any staff here? Or have
you observed any staff behaving in ways that you feel are not child-friendly?
180
Annex 3
Following the rescue and placement of the children from XXXXXXXX shelter home, the Dept. of Social Welfare,
Government of ZZZZ engaged an NGO (in coordination with UNICEF), to assist the affected children with mental
health and psychosocial issues arising from their experiences of trauma and abuse.
At the time NIMHANS was contacted for assistance, based on the Supreme Court order, the NIMHANS team
requested the Dept. of Social Welfare, Government of ZZZZ, to send on the reports of the work completed by the
NGO. This was in order for the NIMHANS team to be able to build on the work already initiated by the NGO,
rather than duplicate services already provided or contradict any messages the children may have received
through their prior engagements and participation in sessions with the NGO staff.
Upon studying the reports provided by the NGO (these reports are available with the Government of ZZZZ), the
NIMHANS team has the following concerns about the nature and type of interventions provided by the NGO:
• On Assessments & Diagnosis:
o The NGO report does not indicate what assessment proforma and protocols were used, so it is unclear as
to how the children were assessed for psychiatric disorders or how the NGO arrived at various conclusions
about the children’s mental health issues. Specific psychological scales are generally not used (as the NGO
team has done) in the first instance—there is a rationale for selection of scales, based on clinical
impressions that are first arrived at through means of history-taking.
o It is technically incorrect to conduct IQ assessments, as the NGO team has done, for children who have
undergone severe trauma and abuse, in the immediate aftermath of the traumatic events. Given the
adverse impact that trauma can have on children, including their socio-emotional and cognitive states, it is
often difficult to get children in this state, to respond to standardized IQ test questions. Thus, the results of
IQ testing in children in a state of trauma are not valid or reliable—the results of IQ testing will be
inaccurate as the child’s difficulty to respond (due to trauma) can be misinterpreted as low IQ. Thus, where
necessary, following detailed clinical assessments, decisions regarding IQ testing can be made but must be
implemented only when enough time has passed to allow for the child to receive opportunities for healing
and recovery as well as to return to normal daily functioning. For children who have moderate to profound
intellectual disability (such as for those in BBBB shelter home), IQ tests are unlikely to be the appropriate
tools for assessment. For such children, wherein the disability is more overt and pronounced, more detailed
developmental assessments require to be done—so as to obtain a nuanced understanding of these
children’s (dis)abilities in the five domains of child development, namely physical (locomotor), speech &
language, social, cognitive and emotional development.
o A list of names of children and their mental health problems has been provided by the NGO, in their
report. Problems and diagnoses such as ‘externalising behaviours with hostile and instrumental aggression’
are not valid psychiatric diagnoses. When children have irritability, anger, and violent behaviours towards
others in the context of severe abuse and trauma (as the affected children have), such symptoms constitute
post-traumatic stress disorder (which would be the appropriate diagnosis); they cannot be interpreted as
conduct disorders (a type of externalizing behaviour disorder). Such misinterpretations and erroneous
diagnosis will prove detrimental for the children as incorrect diagnosis will also lead to incorrect
interventions.
181
• On Interventions:
o First level (assessment) and intervention needs to focus on children’s need for psychiatric medication,
based on the extent and severity of trauma in each child. Certain high-risk behaviours such as self-injurious
behaviours are not a matter of counselling and therapy alone, especially in children who have undergone
severe trauma, and are likely to have serious mood dysregulation issues. The NGO team, which appears to
have been comprised of gynaecologists and psychologists, was not equipped to assess and make
recommendations for pharmacotherapy-related interventions—which (for those children requiring it) need
to be administered first, for children to be in mental states that enable them, then to be receive or be
responsive to other counselling interventions. There is no psychiatrist on this NGO team to assess and
respond to psychiatric medication needs of the children (many of whom continue to require this
assistance).
o In several group interventions documented in the report, there was no theoretical or conceptual basis for
the design and implementation of interventions: for example, there is no context in the case of these
children, for conducting activities on ‘understanding & developing empathy’. There was little connect
between the objectives of the session and the activity itself. The report does not detail how children’s art or
narratives were used to process abuse and trauma.
o Techniques such as asking children to return to the past and imagine ‘significant life events’ are
problematic given the nature of the situation: when a team knows that therapeutic assistance is not going
to be provided on a regular, continuous, sustained, medium-to-long term basis, it is unethical to get
children to begin exploring traumatic events in this manner; it is also harmful to engage in such activity
given the poor support systems available to the children i.e. any difficult feelings or behaviours that such
activities trigger then may spiral out of control, with the institution staff neither having the skills nor
resources to manage children who may get into depressive states. [In fact, one of the institution staff was
reluctant to have the NIMHANS team engage with the children—she said that ‘when outside teams and
people like you come and talk and interact with these children, they become very aggressive…they become
worse, after you leave.’ One possible reason why children’s difficult behaviours get heightened following
such ‘therapy’ sessions as conducted by the NGO are that traumatic memories are triggered and there is
no one thereafter, to help the children manage their difficult emotional states].
In the light of the above, it is advisable for the Dept. of Social Welfare, Government of ZZZZ, to refrain from
eliciting the assistance of organizations that do not have the requisite expertise and technical skills to respond to
highly specialized issues such as child sexual abuse and trauma; continuing to engage agencies such as the one
referred to above will only result in (further) child right violations if children who have already undergone such
gross rights violations and trauma are hindered from availing of appropriate and skilled assistance; furthermore,
the affected children are at increased risk of developing mental health morbidity in the medium to long term if the
state fails to provide them with timely and skilled assistance (already delayed) at least now, moving forward.
182
Suggested scripts and Questions for Activity
Impact of Event Sample questions/ suggested questions
Questions
Do you try to remove it Do you find it hard to not think about it? Sometimes when you try to do other things to
from your memory? not think about what happened do you feel that the thoughts still come to you?
Do you have difficulties When you are sitting in class is it difficult to pay attention to what the teacher is
paying attention or saying? Do you think again and again about what uncle did while teacher is teaching?
concentrating? Do you feel sometimes you go blank and have no idea about what the teacher was
teaching or saying?
*If a child says that I don’t pay attention because class is boring etc. you can make a
note about the challenges/ attention issues and rule out that the inattention is not
because of PTSD
Do you have waves of Some people when they think about things that happened feel very angry or very
strong feelings about sad…Do you also get very angry, very sad or upset about what happened when you
it? think about it or when someone says something about it?
Do you startle more Do you feel more scared and more nervous than before it happened? Do you feel that
easily or feel more sometimes even when you hear a small noise you feel very scared?
nervous than you did
before it happened?
Do you stay away from Do you feel these days that you do not wish to go near the playground (the place
reminders of it (e.g. where the incident happened) anymore?
places or situations?)
Do you try not talk Do you try not to talk about it or you feel you should not talk about it?
about it? I see that you do not want to talk about it? Why is it so?
Do pictures about it Does this incident keep coming to your mind? If you close your eyes, do you think that
pop into your mind? this incident keeps on coming to your mind? Do you see uncle or that incident when
you close your eyes?
Do other things keep Do things or other people around you sometimes remind you of uncle or what
making you think happened?
about it?
Do you try not to think Do you try and think that you do not want to think about it? But it keeps coming to
about it? you?
Do you get easily Do you think small-small things these days make you very upset and angry? Do you
irritable? think others don’t easily understand what you try to do and that also makes you angry?
Are you alert and Even when you are with your mummy and daddy do you feel scared about what
watchful even when happened? Do you feel that you need to be very careful or it will happen to you again?
there is no obvious
need to be?
Do you have sleep What time do you go to sleep? Does it take long to fall asleep? Why is it difficult to fall
problems? asleep? Once you go to sleep is that okay? Or do you keep getting up?
Do you sometimes have bad dreams?
(to check for sleep
disturbances)
183
Time
2 Hours
Concept
One of the first interventions, in the immediate aftermath of the abuse, is for medical interventions to be provided.
The goals of the physical and medical examination of the sexually abused child are three-fold:
• To identify abnormalities (injuries, infections and possible pregnancy) that warrant further diagnostic
efforts or treatment.
• To obtain specimens to screen the patient for sexually transmitted infections, and/or pregnancy.
• To make observations and take specimens that may corroborate the patient's history of victimization i.e.
gather forensic evidence for potential use during case investigation and prosecution.
• To make observations and take specimens that may corroborate the patient's history of victimization i.e.
gather forensic evidence for potential use during case investigation and prosecution.
184
Medical Interventions
Consider…
▪ Treatment of injuries, including surgical interventions in case of violent abuse that may have
caused substantial damage to anal and vaginal areas.
▪ Administration of antibiotics and other drugs for sexually transmitted diseases and/or other
infection.
▪ Administration of HIV/AIDS testing and prophylaxis—particularly in there are risks of the
perpetrator having multiple sexual partners. It would be important to liaison with a
(Paediatric) Anti-Retroviral Therapy (ART) centre for these interventions.
▪ In case the child/adolescent is under 20 weeks pregnant, discussions about abortion may
need to be done with the child/adolescent and her caregivers. It is advisable to liaise with a
gynecologist/ obstetrician at this time.
Physical Examination
o Physical examination of child to be conducted including 2 ID marks
o The child’s family or caregiver should be present in the room during the examination.
o Permission of the child and consent of the parent to be taken before examination
o What physical symptoms does the child have at present/ (eg: burning sensation during
micturition, itching in the perineal area, bleeding, any injury, pain…)
Forensic Examination
Check whether an additional specific forensic evaluation has been done (examination
requested by police documenting abuse, if swabs have been taken in case of penetrative
abuse), and if so, whether the report available. Obtain the report from the relevant source.
Pregnancy Tests
o Ensure that a urine pregnancy test has been done.
o In case the results are false negative, it would be best to obtain an additional gynecological
opinion.
Note: The suggested medical and examination tests are applicable in the immediate aftermath of a CSA incident
or episode i.e. not one that may have been reported months after.
Obtaining consent and cooperation from a child, and particularly an adolescent, for medical examination and
interventions can often be challenging. The reasons why children are reluctant to cooperate may pertain to: (i)
viewing medical examinations (particularly of the private parts) as being similar to the actions of the perpetrator;
(ii) fear of the unknown, including that medical procedures might be invasive or painful; (ii) fear of the discovery of
185
pregnancy. In the light of these fears that children and adolescents may have, and the sometimes even
(self)harming behaviour that children may impulsively resort to in these circumstances, it is never advisable to
proceed with medical examination, without adequate preparation of the child. Refer to Box X for a possible script
for use with children, to help them understand the nature and purpose of medical examination, and to reassure
them that any health issue is treatable i.e. that you (or a parent/caregiver) will accompany them to the medical
facility, and be supportive of them, no matter what the outcomes are— such preparation and reassurance is likely
to increase the chances of the child cooperating in these procedures.
✓ “We want to ensure that your health is alright. When children have been in unsafe circumstances
and have been hurt/ abused, they may acquire some infections. Testing for this will help us identify
if the infection is indeed present and start the appropriate treatment fast”.
✓ “Unprotected sex with known/unknown (or more than one person) can result in injury and
disease—especially as we do not know what infections those people have. So, we need to do some
tests to check for any possible infection so we can treat it”.
✓ “Since you have been hurt and abused by someone in ways that are physical and sexual, there are
chances of your being pregnant. It would be important to do a test and find out if you are
pregnant, for a few different reasons: i) doing a test early enough may help you terminate the
pregnancy in case you do not want to continue with the pregnancy/ keep the baby i.e. if we delay
finding out, it may be hard to implement the medical processes necessary to terminate the
pregnancy; ii) in case you wish to keep the baby, then it will be critical for you to maintain your
health and your baby’s health in certain ways—so finding out early will help us guide you on how
to do this. So, finding out sooner about whether or not you are pregnant will help you make some
decisions comfortably... and offer you more options in this regard”. [For adolescents at risk of
pregnancy].
✓ “The doctor may ask to examine your private parts…but this will be in the presence of a nurse or
your mother/ caregiver…it may seem a little scary and uncomfortable…remember it is only to
check for any injury or health problem”
186
Depending on where the abuse occurred and who the perpetrator is, it is essential to immediately take measures
to protect the child from further abuse. This is especially applicable when the perpetrator is a family member or a
person known to the child, and where the abuse has occurred at home or in places the child frequents on a daily
or regular basis (such as school/ tutorials etc). Even in instances where the child and/or family are not willing to file
an FIR with the police, it is imperative to take actions the keep the child safe i.e. remove the child from being in
187
contact with the perpetrator. These may necessitate (temporary) measures such as making alternative living
arrangements for the child, with relatives/ extended family with whom the child feels safe and comfortable. In case
the abuse has occurred at school, the child may be permitted to stay away from school until such time as other
processes, legal and psychosocial, are in place; at a later stage, a change in school may also be considered, should
the child and family wish not to return to the same school.
Method: Discussion
Materials: Cases or situations (some are provided below but others may be invited from participants).
o S is a 10-year-old child who was sexually abused by her school teacher. She comes from a
supportive family, with parents who are keen to assist her.
o Y is a 13-year-old boy who was sexually abused by his sports coach during his football training
practices.
o X is a 15-year-old girl who was sexually abused by her uncle who lives in the same space as
her/her family.
o J is a 14-year-old girl who lives in a residential school. She enjoys being in this hostel and has a
very good rapport with the staff. She went home for the summer holidays, to her family, and was
abused by a next-door neighbour. She returns to the school after the holidays, which is when she
reported the abuse to the school counsellor.
o Is there any other information that you might wish to seek and consider whilst making your
decision?
There are several reasons why one of the early responses to CSA entails working with the family. A child or
adolescent, as a minor, is dependent for every need, including those of safety, on the family. Therefore, the
cohesiveness or functionality of a family, and its relationship with the child is one of the key determinants of the
type of support that the child will receive, ranging from his/her abuse experience being believed, to access to
medical and mental health assistance, opportunities for reporting and legal aid, and finally, access to justice.
in not just the immediate aftermath of abuse, but even in the months and years later. This is because the impact of
CSA, depending on the effectiveness of the interventions provided after the abuse, and the degree to which
mental health issues were resolved, may continue and change, based on the developmental stage of the child. This
is because children often continue to try to make sense of the abuse experience, over time, and based therefore
on external stimuli (particularly family responses) that they may receive. Take for example, a case of a child who
was sexually abused at preschool. While interventions maybe employed at the time, to address her PTSD
symptoms, even as trauma memories fade, anxiety responses and related emotional regulation issues can persist.
As a result, other stressful or challenging experiences, later on, begins to invoke anxiety responses, and the child
might present with anxiety disorder. Thus, parental responses, and their understanding of CSA impacts, influence
the child’s mental health even at a later time in the child’s life. On a related note, families’ responses to abuse i.e.
in terms of how believing and supporting they are, also impact the child’s attachment and trust in the family,
again, influencing the child’s relationship with the family, well into adulthood.
However, family systems, with their own dynamics, may also have limited abilities and resources to adequately
support their child. Non-offending carers (NOCs) experience high levels of distress and increased isolation after
their child has been abused, feeling responsible or even guilty for their ‘inability’ to protect their child.
Furthermore, whilst caring for their child and protecting them from further harm NOCs are often compelled to
navigate: (i) new and confusing systems (such as child protection procedures, police investigations etc); (ii)
challenging family dynamics (such as relationship breakdowns, relocations, issues with siblings). Hence, and true of
any child mental health problem, it is critical to partner with families, in order to assist the child. As in other
instances, NOC very often need their own psychological support; it is well-established that positive mental
wellbeing for NOCs lead to positive outcomes for children and NOCs who are well supported can in turn support
their children well.
distant positions vis a vis their parents, and rarely seeking their help or advise in complex of troubling life
situations.
Thus, for these reasons, not least of which are to have parents help children deal with the immediate aftermath of
the abuse (i.e. PTSD and other emotional and behavioural consequences), that working with caregivers to cultivate
and develop a belief in the child’s abuse account, becomes critical. Furthermore, given that children are minors,
and younger children require assent and older children and adolescents are dependent on their families for care
and protection, familial belief is not only a precursor, but a necessary factor in facilitating mandatory reporting
processes and legal interventions.
• PTSD reactions in child… how child’s emotional state impacts daily routine and activities of child
Feelings their child may experience of fear, anger, loss, self-blame and shame and how these emotions combined
with emotional dysregulation, may manifest as difficult behaviours—which are different for different individuals,
depending on the interplay of dynamics of CSA as well as parental responses to the abuse. Such behaviours may
range from restlessness and anxiety, depression and self-harm behaviours to anger, aggression, substance use and
high risk (or socially inappropriate)6 sexual behaviour. These emotions and behaviours may also impact a child’s
abilities to engage in self-care and other daily routines of school and play. It would be useful to help them
understand how and why their child is behaving a particular manner—and how they may respond at these times
i.e. by reminding the child to use the first level responses that may have been taught in therapy—such as
relaxation exercises and following daily routines, so as to restore a sense of security and predictability in the child’s
life. Refer to the two boxes below on how to work with families and caregivers to understand the affected areas of
socio-emotional functioning of their child, as well as possible reasons for this.
6 By socially inappropriate sexual behaviour, we mean sexualized behaviour, particularly as occurring in young children who have been
sexually abused.
191
Suggested Reading
▪ Oates, R. K., O'TOOLE, B. I., Lynch, D. L., Stern, A., & Cooney, G. (1994). Stability and change in outcomes for
sexually abused children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 33(7), 945-953.
▪ Stern, A. E., Lynch, D. L., Oates, R. K., O'Toole, B. I., & Cooney, G. (1995). Self esteem, depression, behaviour
and family functioning in sexually abused children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(6), 1077-
1089.
▪ Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcome in sexually abused children. Child
abuse & neglect, 24(7), 983-994.
▪ Martin, G., Bergen, H. A., Richardson, A. S., Roeger, L., & Allison, S. (2004). Sexual abuse and suicidality:
Gender differences in a large community sample of adolescents. Child abuse & neglect, 28(5), 491-503.
▪ Whitaker, D. J., Le, B., Hanson, R. K., Baker, C. K., McMahon, P. M., Ryan, G., ... & Rice, D. D. (2008). Risk
factors for the perpetration of child sexual abuse: A review and meta-analysis. Child abuse & neglect, 32(5),
529-548.
▪ Dong, M., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Dube, S. R., Williamson, D. F., Thompson, T. J., ... & Giles, W. H. (2004). The
interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. Child abuse &
neglect, 28(7), 771-784.
▪ Elliott, A. N., & Carnes, C. N. (2001). Reactions of nonoffending parents to the sexual abuse of their child: A
review of the literature. Child maltreatment, 6(4), 314-331.
▪ Hershkowitz, I., Lanes, O., & Lamb, M. E. (2007). Exploring the disclosure of child sexual abuse with alleged
victims and their parents. Child abuse & neglect, 31(2), 111-123.
▪ Tyler, K. A. (2002). Social and emotional outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: A review of recent
research. Aggression and violent behaviour, 7(6), 567-589.
▪ Deblinger, E., Stauffer, L. B., & Steer, R. A. (2001). Comparative efficacies of supportive and cognitive
behavioural group therapies for young children who have been sexually abused and their nonoffending
mothers. Child maltreatment, 6(4), 332-343.
▪ Jacob, P., & Seshadri, S. P. (2013). Parenting in children and adolescents with internalising
disorders. Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 9(4), 136-148.
▪ Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2000). Predictors of treatment outcome in sexually abused children. Child
abuse & neglect, 24(7), 983-994.
▪ Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2008). Trauma‐focused cognitive behavioural therapy for children and
parents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 13(4), 158-162.
▪ Lambert, J. E., Holzer, J., & Hasbun, A. (2014). Association between parents’ PTSD severity and children's
psychological distress: A meta‐analysis. Journal of traumatic stress, 27(1), 9-17.
▪ Banyard, V. L., Williams, L. M., & Siegel, J. A. (2003). The impact of complex trauma and depression on
parenting: An exploration of mediating risk and protective factors. Child maltreatment, 8(4), 334-349.
▪ Gewirtz, A., Forgatch, M., & Wieling, E. (2008). Parenting practices as potential mechanisms for child
adjustment following mass trauma. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(2), 177-192.
▪ Cohen, L. R., Hien, D. A., & Batchelder, S. (2008). The impact of cumulative maternal trauma and diagnosis
on parenting behaviour. Child maltreatment, 13(1), 27-38.
▪ Yehuda, R., Halligan, S. L., & Bierer, L. M. (2001). Relationship of parental trauma exposure and PTSD to
PTSD, depressive and anxiety disorders in offspring. Journal of psychiatric research, 35(5), 261-270.
▪ Streeck-Fischer, A., & van der Kolk, B. A. (2000). Down will come baby, cradle and all: Diagnostic and
therapeutic implications of chronic trauma on child development. Australian & New Zealand Journal of
Psychiatry, 34(6), 903-918.
195
196
Additional Materials
Audio Clip for Activity on ‘Identifying Themes in Family Responses’
197
Concept
Asking questions, and attempting to establish depth interventions when the child is facing a crisis i.e. in the
immediate aftermath of abuse, is not a useful beginning. This is not the time to for detailed enquiry. If there are
serious and disruptive manifestations --like self-harm behaviours, incapacitating anxiety, PTSD symptoms with
severe panic, appropriate psychiatric referral at this stage is important (as psychiatric medication may be required
for anxiety symptoms to reduce before any counselling work is initiated).
• First-level response is about alleviating immediate suffering and providing initial relief.
• If anxiety is not dealt with, or is very severe, it becomes difficult for the child to carry out
daily activities.
• Feelings of unpredictability and lack of control can be debilitating for a child.
• Anxiety becomes the basis for development of depression (and other psychological
problems); it can make the child increasingly vulnerable to negative coping
mechanisms— such as aggressive behaviours, substance abuse etc.
Most sexually abused children’s anxieties stem from worries and anxieties that they are internally processing. Thus,
in the course of the interview, some responses will be provided to each individual child to allay initial confusions
and anxieties that they may be experiencing— whether these pertain to the perpetrator, the law or their future, for
instance. Responding to children’s questions and confusions is a critical part of first level responses as this helps to
stem further distress and anxiety, at least to some extent. Of course, these responses need to be detailed out and
reiterated during the course of depth interventions.
Professionals many times, may be empathetic to children who are sexually abused, but sometimes despite the
empathy and understanding struggle to respond to when children disclose about their abuse. They may feel
overwhelmed, or sometimes may not know what to say to children when children narrate their sexual abuse
experiences/ or when children break down or cry while sharing these experiences. We may therefore, get
completely silent or say something like “I am so sorry…it (the abuse) won’t happen again, we will keep you safe”,
“what happened to you was very very bad, we will make sure he gets punished for hurting you…” or “don’t be
sad…what has happened has happened …focus on your studies now”, “I am with you, just forget about whatever
happened and move on”. While many of these responses have a good intention to distract the child from
traumatic feelings the problem with these responses is that these responses are not balanced. These responses are
more avoidant and do not actually address the fears and worries or the inner voices that may be causing anxiety in
children.
• Can we really ever guarantee that the abuse incident will never happen again and despite our best efforts,
can we always keep child safe? There may sometimes be situations that may be out of our control. Think
about what will happen if the child experiences something similar (sexual abuse) or is threatened or
violated by the abuser again…what will happen to your therapeutic relationship with the child? What about
child’s inner voices them? The idea is not to tell the child that we absolutely cannot guarantee anything
because that would be devastating, but to reflect and see if we can provide balanced responses to
children.
• We are aware that the court makes its decisions based on the evidence and sometimes despite the efforts
from the child, the lawyer and the mental health professional, an acquittal may happen due to lack of
evidence. What kind of impact would it have on the child when we say that if they say the truth and tell the
judge everything the person (abuser) will definitely get punished. What do you think will be the inner
voices of the child if the case actually results in acquittal?
• Or when we say don’t be sad and forget about what happened. Are these really legitimate responses? Can
a person ever hit a delete button and forget about their traumatic and difficult experiences?
Therefore, as we respond to children it is important that our responses are – truthful, comforting and reassuring
and is appropriate for the child’s developmental age and child’s experience. Let us try writing some scripts and
practice providing first level responses.
199
Discussion:
• Ask each sub-group to present their list of questions and responses in plenary.
Invite the others to attempt responses also and provide comments and feedback.
Case 1: An 8-year-old is being sexually abused by the school bus driver. He cries all the time and has nightmares
and tells his mother that he does not want to go to school any more. One day, his mother (who does not know
about the abuse) has forcibly brought him to school and the child tells you what is happening on the bus daily.
Inner voices:
o I am scared of driver uncle.
o I don’t want to go to school.
o Why did driver uncle do this to me, I am dirty boy now…
o What was that strange thing driver uncle did to me?
o Why does mummy not understand me?
Response:
You know sometimes people like driver uncle are bad people. They do bad things to children and sometimes even to
older people. They don’t think about how what they do can hurt others. They are uncaring. I believe, if anyone would
have been in your place they would also have been scared and they may also would not have wanted to go to
school. Maybe you are worried that driver uncle will hurt you again if you to the school and go in the school bus. I
can talk to mummy so that you can be at home for a few days to rest and relax and do something nice to take your
mind off this.
I also feel that since you have not told mummy about this that is why she thinks that driver uncle is good or she
made you go to the school when you didn’t want to. I understand that you may have your reasons for not telling her,
and maybe we can talk about those. We can also then tell mummy about what driver uncle did. We can even tell
your teacher in school so that they remove driver uncle so that you don’t have to be scared of him in on your way to
the school or in the school. And in a few days when you are ready to come back to school maybe we can ask
mummy and daddy to bring you to school for a few days or weeks till you feel okay.
Case 2: A 15-year-old girl is suddenly doing poorly in academics and getting into arguments with her peers; when
people get upset with her or ask her why she is behaving that way, she just bursts into tears. One day, you call and
200
gently ask what is troubling her…she tells you that her uncle, who visits her home regularly, comes into her room
each night and touches her genitals. [She also tells you later that her father’s friend has touched her similarly
once].
Inner voices:
o Why does this happen to me again and again?
o Is something wrong with me
o Is it my fault…
Response:
Sometimes things happen by chance. It has got nothing to do with you. Imagine a war situation, when bombing
occurs the bomb is not directed at a particular house. It is a matter of chance that the bomb lands on that house.
Similarly, if a house gets robbed and a few months later the house gets robber again. Do you think it’s the owner’s
fault or they invited the robbers into their house …or is again a matter of chance. What if these owners had the
best security system in place but it still happens…can they be blamed for the robbery?
Just like these situations, when someone hurts you, it is not your fault or it is not because something is wrong with
you. These people are bad people they look for children who are available. It could have been anyone in your
place.
Case 3: A 10-year-old is an orphan child residing in a child care institution. He came to the counsellor for
treatment for behaviour problems, during the course of which he reported sexual abuse by one of the institution
staff (other staff deny that this happened in their institution, saying child is lying).
Inner voices:
o I don’t have parents that is why everyone is doing this to me …
o No one will believe, I am bad they don’t like me…they will obviously say its my fault.
o What if they remove me from the institution if I tell them?
Response:
We see many children they may come to us and report these experiences. Many of them also live with their
parents and some do not have parents. So, this can actually happen to anyone irrespective of whether they live
with their parents or without them. I understand that you have had some problems with the staff here and you
have had issues with the children but that does not give anyone the right to hurt you. No one, no matter what has
the right to hurt children. I believe you and I do not think it is your fault. I know that it must be hurtful that some
people did not believe you when you told them about the problems, sometimes people do not believe because
they do not have information and therefore, they are unable to understand.
You know there are also special rules and laws in the country to keep children safe. If we go ahead and report the
police, they will remove this person from the institution. He will not be allowed to come back. We will also ensure
that you have a safe place to live and are not left alone. Just like this child care institution there are several other
child care institutions. We can give you some options, of course you can choose to stay in the same institution, but
if you feel unsafe in any way then we can show you these other institutions. You can go and visit these institutions
and uncle will definitely not be there.
Case 4: A 15-year-old girl has been sexually assaulted by a 19-year-old boy; he first be-friended her, told her that
he loved her and then engaged her sexually—she says that the sexual activity was without her consent. However,
201
now she also tells her parents that she does not want a police complaint lodged against him and that she wants to
be with him—to move out of home and live with him. She is sad and depressed but also aggressive at times,
threatening self-harm if her parents do not allow her to be with the boy.
Inner voices:
• He said he loved me …then why did he do this to me?
• I love him and I don’t want him to get into trouble.
• I don’t want to be away from him and live …I will die without him.
Responses:
I see that this person told you that he loved you and it is a great feeling when someone says that because
everyone wants to be loved and cared for. I understand that you may be confused or sad or even angry because
you are not with him and maybe you also feel that no one understands you at the moment. Maybe you have a lot
of questions in your mind about what has happened and you even miss him. I can help you by discussing some of
your thoughts about this situation, your parent’s concerns. We can even then think of ways in which you can feel
better and less stressed about everything.
We can talk more about relationships and I can share some ideas with you in which you can differentiate between
good and bad people and choose who to trust and make decisions about engaging with them as a friend or in a
relationship, so that you can make more solid decisions and avoid getting hurt in the future. I want you to know
that I am on your side and I want the best for you…
*Use the window approach framework with the child to get into more discussions with the child to talk about
boundaries, privacy, consent, relationships, health, and safety and finally abuse.
Case 5: A 16-year-old girl rescued from sex trafficking is now in a child care institution. She was trafficked by her
family. She has been in sex work for the last two years. She is angry and aggressive all the time. She is mistrustful
of people and keeps talking about revenge. At other times, she says that her life is over—since her self-respect has
been taken away.
Inner voices:
o Why did this happen to me?
o I have lost my honour
o What will I tell people if I ever go back home…everyone will know what has happened to me and what I
have done.
o I will never get married, or have no relationship or future. (could be a common inner voice of many
adolescents who are rescued from trafficking)
Response:
I don’t know why your family made the decision to send you away but I know that it has been very difficult for
you. When people who are closest to us make decisions that can hurt us or do things that can hurt us…that can
naturally make us feel angry and make us feel like no one can ever be trusted. You are absolutely justified
therefore in feeling angry. But remember there are different kinds of people in the world…some who have also
gotten you out of these difficult situations.
I also understand your worries about going back home…well you do not have to tell everything to everyone. You
can simply tell people that there were some difficulties back at home and you had to go out and work and you did
not like it…the working conditions were not as you had imagined to be and therefore you decided to come back
202
for good. And just because a criminal act was committed against you, that does not mean that you cannot be
married or fall in love…you absolutely have the right to fall in love and be married.
**To provide perspective on the issue of losing honour, get the child to do the exercise in the next box - Where does
my self-respect and honour lie and engage in discussion.
203
I am dirty…
“You are not dirty…he is dirty. You are not responsible for what happened, he is. And like I said, he
is bad and dirty for doing hurtful things to you.”
(In case child is hesitant to tell parents/ caregivers…) I don’t want to tell my
parents…they will get angry and punish me…or they may think that I am lying.
“I see that you are afraid that your parents might disbelieve you and be upset with you for talking
about what is happening. But if you allow me, I can help you explain to them what happened…the
reason I feel it is important they know about this is that they can then help to stop the hurt and
keep you safe.”
Preparing the child to give legal evidence (such as the magistrate’s statement as per
Section 164, POCSO)…
“As we said, no one is allowed to hurt children. If they do, we have rules in our country about
how people should behave with children. If someone breaks those rules and harms children,
then action will be taken against them—by the police and judges. [Just like we have rules about
stealing and breaking into people’s houses—where also the police and judges will catch people
who do that and take action against them]. So, we need you to tell the judge what this person
did/ how he hurt you…the judge may ask you a few questions which you don’t have to be
scared of. S(he) only know so that s(he) can protect you and other children from bad people
who hurt children. I/ your parents will be with you, so you will not have to meet the judge
alone…”
(In case of multiple abusers…) Why do people keep doing this to me? There must be
something wrong with me, my body…something that prompts people to behave this way with
me.
I understand that when people (repeatedly) make sexual overtures, one can feel self-conscious and
uncomfortable about one’s body. But I don’t think there is anything in you or your body that causes
some people to behave this way…these are people who are cruel and uncaring, who have no respect
for others’ space or feelings. So, they would behave this way with a lot of other people too…and I
believe they must have. It is just unfortunate coincidence that this kind of thing happened to you
repeatedly, with different people.
Process
• Ask the child to take a blank page.
• Ask the child to draw a picture of their self-respect or dignity. (Ask them to think and draw-
What shape or form does it take? What colour is it? How big is it?)
• Help the child with the prompts and ask them to do the following sentence completion activity.
• I am …
• I feel…
• I live in…
• It is difficult for me when…
• People hurting me makes me feel…
• It will help me if…
• Other people see me as…
• I feel destroyed when…
• I wish that…
Discussion
Suggested Readings
▪ Seshadri, S., & Ramaswamy, S. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for child sexual abuse. Indian Journal of
Psychiatry, 61(Suppl 2), 317.
▪ Keller-Dupree, E. A. (2013). Understanding childhood trauma: Ten reminders for preventing
retraumatization. The Practitioner Scholar: Journal of Counseling and Professional Psychology, 2(1), 1-11.
▪ Garcia, J. A., & Weisz, J. R. (2002). When youth mental health care stops: therapeutic relationship problems
and other reasons for ending youth outpatient treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 70(2), 439.
▪ Cloitre, M., Stovall-McClough, K. C., Nooner, K., Zorbas, P., Cherry, S., Jackson, C. L., ... & Petkova, E. (2010).
Treatment for PTSD related to childhood abuse: A randomized controlled trial. American journal of
psychiatry, 167(8), 915-924.
▪ Ramchandani, P., & Jones, D. P. (2003). Treating psychological symptoms in sexually abused children: from
research findings to service provision. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183(6), 484-490.
208
Additional Materials
Case studies for Activity on ‘First Level Responses to Children’s Experiences of Sexual Abuse’
Case 1: An 8-year-old is being sexually abused by the school bus driver. He cries all the time and has nightmares
and tells his mother that he does not want to go to school any more. One day, his mother (who does not know
about the abuse) has forcibly brought him to school and the child tells you what is happening on the bus daily.
Case 2: A 15-year-old girl is suddenly doing poorly in academics and getting into arguments with her peers; when
people get upset with her or ask her why she is behaving that way, she just bursts into tears. One day, you call and
gently ask what is troubling her…she tells you that her uncle, who visits her home regularly, comes into her room
each night and touches her genitals. [She also tells you later that her father’s friend has touched her similarly
once].
Case 3: A 10-year-old is an orphan child residing in a child care institution. He came to the counsellor for
treatment for behaviour problems, during the course of which he reported sexual abuse by one of the institution
staff (other staff deny that this happened in their institution, saying child is lying).
Case 4: A 16-year-old girl rescued from sex trafficking is now in a child care institution. She was trafficked by her
family. She has been in sex work for the last two years. She is angry and aggressive all the time. She is mistrustful
of people and keeps talking about revenge. At other times, she says that her life is over—since her self-respect has
been taken away.
Case 5: A 15-year-old girl has been sexually assaulted by a 19-year-old boy; he first be-friended her, told her that
he loved her and then engaged her sexually—she says that the sexual activity was without her consent. However,
now she also tells her parents that she does not want a police complaint lodged against him and that she wants to
be with him—to move out of home and live with him. She is sad and depressed but also aggressive at times,
threatening self-harm if her parents do not allow her to be with the boy.
209
Learning Objectives
• To learn techniques and methods for containment of anxiety immediately after the child sexual abuse
experience.
Time
2 Hours
Concept
Children who have been sexually abused first and foremost require time to rest and recover from traumatic
experiences. They may therefore be encouraged to play, listen to music, do art activities purely for recreational
purposes—to keep them entertained but at the same time also occupied (so that they are not sitting idle and
constantly thinking about the traumatic experience). Play activities also help children with emotional regulation.
Parents and caregivers must be encouraged to spend quality time with children, playing with them and reassuring
them about their safety, but not trying to extract details of the abuse. First level psychosocial responses to sexually
abused children consist of a range of interventions from ensuring the child’s immediate safety to responding to
children’s anxieties regarding the abuse, to rest, relaxation, leisure and maintenance of the child’s developmental
trajectories (as detailed below).
Relaxation Exercises
Drawing from cognitive behaviour therapy methods, relaxation exercises can be used to help sexually abused
children control and manage anxiety or anxiety-provoking thoughts. Essentially, this means getting children to
focus on thinking or doing something different, to calm and/or distract the mind at times of high anxiety. Two
techniques, deep breathing and guided imagery, may be taught to children—who also need to know when and
how to use these techniques i.e. to use them every time they feel the abuse images returning (PTSD) and their
anxiety increasing. You can explain to children that focusing on breathing and thinking of pleasant things such as
happy events in their lives or imaginary places they would like to visit help the mind to feel calmer and happier. It
is useful to demonstrate these exercises to children so they can experience how they work.
Guided imagery is a method of relaxation which concentrates the mind on positive images in an attempt to reduce
pain, stress, etc. The activity gets children to use their imagination to leave their present (difficult situation/
thoughts) and think of or ‘go to’ happier places and situations instead, when they feel anxious or stressed.
210
Belly breathing
• Sit or lie flat in a comfortable position.
• Put one hand on your belly just below your ribs and the other hand on your chest.
• Take a deep breath in through your nose, and let your belly push your hand out.
• Slowly breathe out through your mouth—open your mouth and expel all the air you took
in.
• Do this breathing 3 to 10 times.
Calm Breathing
• Take a slow breath in through the nose (for about 4 seconds)
• Hold your breath for 1 or 2 seconds.
• Exhale slowly through the mouth (over about 4 seconds)
• Wait 2-3 seconds before taking another breath (5-7 seconds for teenagers) o Repeat for at
least 5 to 10 breaths.
211
Close your eyes and relax in your chair. Sit in a comfortable position…take your shoes off if you
like. Let your hands and legs lose, relax your body muscles. Let slow, relaxed energies flow from
your head, down to your neck and shoulders, your arms, your hands and finger-tips…from your
neck down to your chest, stomach and abdomen…to your thighs, knees, legs…your feet and
toes…until you feel your body relax and quiet. We are now going to leave this therapy room
and go on a little journey, away from here…we are walking out of this room, down the steps
and out of the building and up the path that leads to the street…and there on the road where
the trees are, your feet lift off the ground and you slowly begin to fly…higher and higher and
higher, until you pass the branches and are at tree-top level…and then you are above the trees.
You move higher until the trees and buildings are far, far below you and they grow smaller and
smaller in the distance.
You float along the clouds…you can reach out and touch them, soft and warm and light…feel
the sunlight streaming through the clouds to touch you…and so you fly on and on until
suddenly you come out of the clouds and find yourself descending, slowly, gradually…you can
now see the tree tops again as you pass them by and fly lower and lower until your feet touch
the ground. Then you find that you are in a beautiful garden and your feet are on soft green
carpet of grass. You walk along a while and see the flowers…roses lilies and some unusual ones
you’d never seen before…in colours bright and pale…pink, red, orange, yellow, sunset colours,
white, mauve and blue…a lovely mix of sweet fragrances reaches you. You can hear the birds
chip and the rustling of the breeze through other fruit trees…mangoes, coconut, chikoo and
guava. You decide to sit under the mango tree…your favourite fruit…and you eat a delicious,
juicy mango…now you lick the juice that’s running down your elbow…and as you look around
for a place to rinse your hands, you see a beautiful lake.
You are standing on the soft, white sands by the backwaters of the lake…your feet sink into the
sand as you make patterns with your toes. When you reach down to touch the water, it feels
wonderfully cool and clean. The water is so clear that as you look down at it, you can see all
the way down to the bottom of it…and you can see lots of coloured fish…big fish, small fish,
tiny fish…orange, red, spotted, silver and gold, some swimming quickly, others quietly floating
or asleep. The water feels so good that you dip your feet in it. Then you slowly begin walking
away, back into the garden, letting the breeze dry your feet and hands.
*Note: This is just an example; you can use any images that are relaxing for the child.
212
As and when children are ready, it is best for them to resume their daily routines so that their developmental
needs continue to be met. Abuse-focused healing interventions alone are insufficient and healing and recovery
can also take a long time; in the interim, it is therefore important to recognize the importance of maintaining
children’s developmental trajectories— which are (as previously discussed) disrupted by experiences of trauma
and abuse. Enabling children gradually to return to daily schedules and activities such as school and play helps to
restore:
– Normalcy and balance.
– Predictability (something that is lost in the abuse situation due to the lack of predictability of abusers and of
abuse events).
– Control i.e. enables children to feel that they have some control over their time and activities, and decisions on
what to do.
All of the above therefore also help reduce anxiety. Helping children to structure and organize their day to
accommodate various activities such as daily self-care activities (bathing, eating etc.), school, play, relaxation and
recreation, family/ social time also leaves a lot less time for children to be thinking about the abuse events that
lead to anxiety.
It may be common for children or adolescents to struggle with sleep after their difficult and traumatic experience of
sexual abuse. Among the most common consequences of stress and trauma are disruptions of sleep – these may
include shorter sleep duration, difficulty falling asleep, frequent awakenings, nightmares, sleepless nights, and
early-morning wakefulness. As the bedtime approaches, as the surroundings become quieter, the thoughts about
abuse may whizz through their mind, making it difficult to fall asleep or stay asleep due to nightmares relating to
the abuse. Due to the anxiety that they may experience in the night particularly around bedtime, some children
(even the older ones) may even insist on sleeping in the same bed with the caregiver. One of the ways to contain
anxiety is to ensure that the sleep cycle is maintained after the difficult experience. Sleeping adequately will
ensure the child is rested and relaxed.
• Finish dinner early (an hour before the bedtime)…work with the child to make the bed.
• Put a clean bedsheet, pillow, and a blanket (in case the weather is cold). Allow the child to keep and
choose bedsheet that they like. (for e.g. with their favourite colour, design) for sleeping.
• Keep a separate pair of night clothes. Get the child to take a warm bath or wash her/his feet, hands
and face and change into the night clothes.
• Give the child scented soaps, bath oils ((depending on his/her preference).
• Dim the bedroom lights.
• Lie down or sit next to the child, and read a book or talk about their day. Remember, the
conversations must be light and not distressing.
• Sing to the child, or sing with the child. In case, the child likes listening to music, some soft and
soothing music can be played in the background.
• Tell the child that you will be there till he or she goes to sleep, or if the child insists you may even
sleep in the child’s bedroom for a few days so that the child feels safe (however, explain to the child
that it is only a temporary arrangement).
213
Material: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LicIuq_lHkY
Process:
Sample Script
Tell the child, “As you hear the different parts of your body mentioned, repeat the name of the part
silently, move all of your awareness into that part of your body, tighten the muscles in that body
part and gently release. Notice the movement from one part to the next”
Right hand thumb … 1st finger … 2nd finger … 3rd finger … 4th finger … palm of the hand … back
of the hand … wrist … forearm … elbow … upper arm … right shoulder … armpit … chest … waist …
hip … groin … buttock … thigh … knee … calf … ankle … heel … sole of the foot … top of the foot …
right big toe … 2nd toe … 3rd toe … 4th toe … 5th toe. Left hand thumb … 1st finger … 2nd finger
… 3rd finger … 4th finger … palm of the hand … back of the hand … wrist … forearm … elbow …
upper arm … left shoulder … armpit … chest … waist … hip … groin … buttock … thigh … knee …
calf … ankle … heel … sole of the foot … top of the foot … left big toe … 2nd toe … 3rd toe … 4th
toe … 5th toe.
Move your awareness to the top of the head … forehead … right temple … left temple … right ear
… left ear … right cheek … left cheek … right eyebrow … left eyebrow … eyebrow center … right
eye … left eye … right nostril … left nostril … whole nose … upper lip … lower lip … chin … jaw …
throat … right collarbone …left collarbone … right chest … left chest … heart center … upper
abdomen … navel … lower abdomen … tailbone… right buttock … left buttock … the entire spine,
from the tailbone to the base of the skull … right shoulder … left shoulder … back of the neck …
back of the head … crown of the head.
Now feel the whole right arm … the whole left arm … both arms together … the whole right leg …
the whole left leg … both legs together … the entire upper body … the face … the head … the
body … the whole body … your entire body.
214
As previously discussed, anxiety frequently manifests in sexually abused children as medically unexplained body
aches and pains as well as fainting and ‘black-outs’. Children express extreme anxiety in this way because they are
unable to express their feelings and talk about the abuse event i.e. the pain is actually in their minds but they feel it
elsewhere because they are then able to describe it more easily.
Children may also have fainting spells and black-outs when they feel overwhelmed with anxiety relating to the
abuse event and wish to avoid or dissociate from event and its memories1--fainting and black outs are a
mechanism to cope with or avoid situations that provoke high levels of anxiety. It is important to help caregivers
understand that children in such situations are not lying or pretending or being dramatic.
With children, two types of intervention are useful, to help them deal with the anxiety:
• Reassure the child that there is no physical health problem.
• Provide children with an explanatory model for somatic pains (see box below).
• Teach them to control and manage anxiety with relaxation exercises.
Example 2: If you have pizza, coffee, ice-cream, sandwich and then tea, all together, one after another,
what would happen? Your stomach would hurt. Similarly, if we put a lot of things into your head…think
excessively about things…what would happen to it? It would hurt.
Identity Exercises
Often, children who have been sexually abused perceive themselves not only as being weak but also incapable of
doing things i.e. the helplessness felt in the abuse situation tends to become generalized or spill over into other
areas of life as ‘I can’t…I am not good at…’ Additionally, these children also tend to view their identity and selfhood
through an abuse lens: I am equal to my abuse experience. Consequently, both in the present and future, their
worldviews and decisions stem solely from the abuse
experience. For example, when children make decisions about
inter-personal relationships from a purely abuse perspective,
they are likely to view the world as a hostile place, wherein
people are not to be trusted and intimate relationships (in the
future) are to be avoided. It is therefore essential to ensure
that the abuse experience do not form the entirety of
children’s identities.
is interested in sports and dance, a lover of animals…’ Thus, figure B shows the child’s identity as it is when she is
able to see herself as much more than a person who has been abused…and recognize that her identity is made up
of roles, qualities and talents, interests, wherein abuse is just one part of her life and identity.
If interventions are provided, a sexually abused child’s identity moves from A to B i.e. the abuse experience which
occupied the whole identity in A gradually shrinks (it may not completely go away as it cannot always be
forgotten) to become what it is in B.
Activity: Who am I?
Material: paper and pencil
Process:
• Draw a body outline (as shown in the next slide) and explain that “this is you”
• Divide the figure into four parts, telling the child that ‘this represents different parts of you’.
• Write in the following (on different parts of the body drawing, for example, roles &
relationships on the head, qualities & talents on stomach, fears & worries on feet.
o Roles & Relationships (as a teacher, student, family member, friend…)
o Qualities & Strengths (things you are good at, characteristics, special gifts you have)
o Fears & Worries/ traumatic experience (things that make you scared/ sad…)
Suggested Readings
▪ Alvord, M. K., & Grados, J. J. (2005). Enhancing resilience in children: A proactive approach. Professional psychology:
research and practice, 36(3), 238.
▪ Weydert, J. A., Shapiro, D. E., Acra, S. A., Monheim, C. J., Chambers, A. S., & Ball, T. M. (2006). Evaluation of guided
imagery as treatment for recurrent abdominal pain in children: a randomized controlled trial. BMC pediatrics, 6, 1-10.
▪ Steil, R., Jung, K., & Stangier, U. (2011). Efficacy of a two-session program of cognitive restructuring and imagery
modification to reduce the feeling of being contaminated in adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse: A pilot
study. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(3), 325-329.
▪ Price, C. (2005). Body-oriented therapy in recovery from child sexual abuse: an efficacy study. Alternative therapies in
health and medicine, 11(5), 46.
▪ Raabe, S., Ehring, T., Marquenie, L., Olff, M., & Kindt, M. (2015). Imagery rescripting as stand-alone treatment for
posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood abuse. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental
Psychiatry, 48, 170-176.
▪ King, N. J., Tonge, B. J., Mullen, P., Myerson, N., Heyne, D., Rollings, S., ... & Ollendick, T. H. (2000). Treating sexually
abused children with posttraumatic stress symptoms: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Academy of
Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(11), 1347-1355.
▪ Cohen, J. A., & Mannarino, A. P. (2015). Trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for traumatized children and
families. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics, 24(3), 557-570.
▪ Scheeringa, M. S., Weems, C. F., Cohen, J. A., Amaya‐Jackson, L., & Guthrie, D. (2011). Trauma‐focused
cognitive‐behavioural therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in three‐through six year‐old children: A randomized
clinical trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(8), 853-860.
Learning Objectives
• To learn methods to address longer term healing recovery from child sexual abuse.
• To enable children to overcome abuse trauma and empower them to develop coping and survivor skills.
Time
6.5 Hours
Concept
Trauma Informed Care (TIC) is considered a comprehensive multilevel approach that shifts the way organizations
view and approach trauma. A program, agency or system that is trauma-informed is one that: (i) understands the
impact of trauma i.e. recognizing signs and symptoms; (ii) acknowledges the potential paths for recovery by
integrating knowledge of trauma into policies, procedures and practices. It involves validation and recognition of
the effects of traumatic events, common coping strategies, and effective treatments. According to the Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), TIC is centred around the following key principles:
• Safety—Promoting a sense of safety involves a conscious effort to ensure that children feel physically and
emotionally safe.
• Social support—A supportive social network, by way of families and other care providers such as in child
care institutions can be critical sources of support. Together they contribute, through various means, to the
healing of children impacted by abuse and adversity.
• Empowerment, voice, and choice—Developing plans of action for children and adolescents requires
patient-centered approaches that offer them options, and allows them to participate in decisions that
impact their lives, so as to restore agency and ensure empowerment (this is important, given the loss of
agency and disempowerment that CSA caused to them).
• Cultural, historical and gender issues—Interventions must take into consideration and strongly address
socio-cultural and gender stereotypes and prejudices that are likely to impinge on healing processes.
TIC helps provide a widespread understanding among caregivers in the home, school, and community, including
in child care institutions that a child’s inability to regulate emotions or behaviour does not mean the child is “bad,”
but rather that the social environment is not meeting the needs of the child in some way and that the child is likely
to have had extremely difficult experiences, that he/she has been unable to contend with. TIC therefore not only
applies in more overt trauma contexts where CSA and other forms of maltreatment is known to have occurred; it is
exceedingly important to apply this lens within juvenile justice systems, in the context of children in conflict with
law—where children’s difficult social behaviours are often explained by (early)childhood trauma and resultant
219
vulnerabilities and risks. Thus, TIC approaches enable systems and stakeholders to focus on what is most
important–for example, what is triggering the child, and how to help the child self-regulate. Narrative therapy
approaches and Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, amongst others, helps children develop a trauma
narrative, allowing parents, service providers, and other caregivers to provide appropriate support through a
shared understanding of the child’s unique experience with trauma.
220
Objective:
• Understanding and identifying trauma-informed care in therapeutic communications with
children and adolescents.
Material: Demo Videos (QR codes for videos available at the end of this module).
Process:
• Let us consider the TIC approach in the context of children and adolescents who are trafficked
from sex work…to understand how the above-described principles may be applied…
• View the videos
Discussion:
• What specific elements of trauma-informed care did you find striking?
• What do you think healing processes need to address?
• Extend the discussion to children in the context of sex trafficking…wherein raid, rescue,
repatriation, reintegration and redressal are the interventions commonly discussed.
o What about reclamation of self (and of affirmative sexuality)?
o Elements of reclamation entails a focus of healing & recovery:
▪ Therapy for Extreme Trauma and PTSD
• Working through difficult feelings
• Making sense of abuse experiences…moving from confusion to clarity
• Reclaiming identity and self-hood
▪ Counselling on Sexualization
• Learning about personal safety
• Life skills education on happy, healthy, safe sexual behaviours
• Reclaiming affirmative sexual identity
▪ Addressing (Other) High Risk Behaviours and Conduct Issues
• Learning coping/stress management skills
*Moving forward, we are going to engage in skill building exercises, to understand what each of these
healing and recovery interventions means in (child mental health) therapeutic practice.
221
Narrative Approaches
“Trauma narratives are relevant for the way they are told and received” (p.13). To be clear: trauma itself cannot be
reduced to a narrative, but narratives are how people engage in retrospective meaning-making of their traumatic
experiences. This retrospective meaning-making can be an important site of healing and can engender networks of
care and support.”
–Ellison, 20147
Narrative approaches are helpful in the implementation of trauma-informed care interventions as they allow
opportunities for children and adolescents to share narratives and reflections in ways that build new
understandings (to the self) through trauma discourse. Such a discourse on trauma provides building blocks for
young people to construct counter-narratives that can challenge socio-cultural stereotypes, prejudices and indeed
perceived individual deficits in themselves. It can provide a socio-cultural (re)framing about how the gaps are
within social systems, and it is these inequities and injustices that need to be ‘fixed’ and that ‘we are not bad or
broken people’.
John Briere’s Self-Trauma Model also elucidates the importance of developing a coherent narrative, as one of the
interventions in addressing childhood trauma. The fragmented recollections of traumatic events, which often lack
explicit chronological order, are likely to cause additional anxiety, insecurity and derealization in contexts of
incomprehensible events; this in turn, may hinder trauma processing. Research shows that when trauma survivors
are assisted to provide a clearly articulated, well-organized and detailed account of their trauma experience, their
trauma symptoms are likely to decrease. This is because they have the space to give voice to their stories, and
their experiences are believed and validated; and a coherent trauma (or abuse) narrative increases the child’s sense
of control over his or her experience, reduces feelings of chaos, and increases the sense that the universe is
predictable and orderly. Also, when the therapist provides responses (recall the session on first level responses and
how CSA may be explained to children), children are better assisted with emotional and cognitive processing of
their fears and anxieties. They may thus even receive some degree of ‘closure’ as therapist responses might ‘make
sense’ and fit into their models of understanding. Furthermore, eliciting a coherent narrative, including the
meaning that the child has made of the abuse experience (as suggested by Sandra Weiland’s Internalization
Model), provides a platform to shift the narrative i.e. change the (distressing) inner voices.
Helping children (re)construct coherent narratives of the trauma experience, and to re-author problem stories,
may be done through the use of art or letter writing (see activities below). Such methods serve as a way to create
alternative narratives thereby facilitating the re-telling of problem stories by ‘externalizing’ the problem—so that
children see themselves as separate from their problems. The creation of alternative narratives helps shift the
focus for children to be fighters of something external to themselves as opposed to the conventional process
wherein the child thinks he/she needs to change internally. Externalization of this nature may help create solutions
and identify realities they may not otherwise have considered.
7
Ellison, T. L. (2014). An African American mother’s stories as T.M.I.: M.N.I., ethics, and vulnerability
around traumatic narratives in digital literacy research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
13, 275-292.
222
Many traumatized children, for instance, become too terrified and even paralyzed to provide
narratives. However, even young children experience and remember trauma in non-verbal, visual,
auditory, kinaesthetic, visceral, and affective modalities, but has difficulty ‘thinking’ and processing
the experience. Expressive therapies, of which play therapy is one type, does not rely on verbal
communication. Therefore, play therapy can offer opportunities for trauma processing to young
children or those with developmental delays, or those who feel unable to, or unwilling to, engage
verbally. It also helps to (re)construct trauma narratives, helping children gradually make sense of
what happened to them, and allowing for therapeutic responses to be provided in ways that help
them feel safe again, and to form attachment bonds and social connections again. The Trauma-
Focused Integrated Play Therapy model is implemented in the following way:
Phase 1 sets the therapy context, allows the therapeutic relationship to build, encourages a period
of exploration by the child client, and most importantly, creates opportunities for the child to access
reparative resources and activities. The mental health service provider or therapist…
o Familiarizes the child with the setting, the structure, and offers a nondirective play therapy
stance, that can feel like a relief and restore a child’s sense of personal control.
o Shows the child around, or introduces child to the play room, asked for his/her ideas about why
he/she have come to treatment (and if inaccurate, the child is given the accurate context of why
he/she are in therapy).
o Simply allows the child to choose what she/he wants to do, what she/he wants to play with, and
how long she/he wish to spend with any single activity.
o Provides reflective and empathic communication, follows the child’s lead, and provides
unconditional acceptance.
o Allows the child to explore, to find comfort in their play, and eventually, to encourage and
welcome children’s use of symbolic play to manifest concerns or confusions, worries and joys.
Phase 2 addresses traumatic material directly with the intent of creating a trauma narrative and
restoring control and mastery, wherein the mental health service provider or therapist…
o Guides the child through a more directive exploration of his/her abuse, to create a narrative of
what occurred, how he/she felt and thought about it.
o Facilitates the overriding goal which is for the child to clarify his/her thinking, express feelings
through words, actions, or symbolic play, and achieve a certain sense of mastery over the
thinking and telling of something that might have been intolerable earlier.
o Uses methods and techniques may entail games, sand play, art or use of toys/puppets to help
them tell what happened to them, what they thought and felt, what they did or wanted to do.
223
Phase 3 of treatment is to encourage positive social interactions, identify coping strategies, refine
new skills, and affiliate with others, wherein the mental health service provider or therapist…
o Focuses on the child’s restoration to age-appropriate social contact, identification of
important resources in a variety of settings, and helping the child balance his or her view of
the abuse.
o Helps the child view the abuse in perspective, by exploring the trauma and clarifying a
number of issues including that the responsibility for the abuse being with the abuser.
o Helps to restore trust so that the child does not expect to be victimized in the future (and
can thus feel less afraid), also by identifying helpers who are available to listen to and
respond to his/her concerns and worries.
o Aims as clearing or resolving doubts and confusions that can cause shame or fear or guilt
have been resolved so that the child has the best possible understanding of the abuse that
he/she can have given his/her age and cognitive abilities.
224
Objective:
Material: (i) Art-Based Activities for Developing and Shifting Trauma Narratives & Internalizations;
(ii) Letter-Writing therapeutic activity; (ii) Activities for Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural
Therapy (excerpts/ samples provided below)
Time: 5 hours
Process:
• Assuming that you have a group of facilitators for the training, assign two to three activities
(within each of the above-mentioned categories) to a given facilitator.
• Each facilitator may set up a work station (preferably in different rooms or at least in
different corners of a large space).
• Work stations may thus be titled ‘Art-based methods for Shifting Trauma Internalizations’,
‘Letter Writing in Therapy’ and ‘Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioural Therapy’ (with further
sub-divisions).
• Trainees/participants may be divided into sub-groups (of about 7 to 8 persons per sub-
group) and requested to move from one work station to another, to obtain an
understanding and exposure to the afore-mentioned therapeutic methods.
• A sub-group may spend about 30 minutes in each work station, engaging in approximately 2
to 3 therapeutic activities.
• At each work station, the designated facilitator: (i) provides a brief overview of the activity; (ii)
gives the instructions to take the participants through the activity (so they understand/
experience how it is done; (iii) discuss the processing of the activity as it needs to be done
with children.
Discussion:
• Following the exposure of all participants to all work stations, the group re-convenes.
• In plenary, they are asked to share their comments and experiences of the time spent in
learning therapeutic methods…these may be linked back to the introduction provided on
various trauma intervention approaches.
225
Suggested Readings
▪ Karp, C. L., Butler, T. L., & Friedrich, W. N. (1996). Treatment strategies for abused children: From victim to survivor.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
▪ Phifer, L.W., Sibbald, L.K. (2020). Social-Emotional Toolbox for Children & Adolescents—116 Worksheets and Skill
Building Excercises to Support Safety, Connection and Empowerment. PESI Publishing and Media. USA
▪ Myers, I. J., Berliner, L., Briere, J., Hendrix, C. T., Reid, T., & Jenny, C. (2002). Treating adult survivors of severe childhood
abuse and neglect: Further development of an integrative model. JEB Myers, L. Berliner, J. Briere, CT Hendrix, T. Reid, &
C. Jenny. The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment.
▪ Golden, N. (2020). The Importance of Narrative: Moving Towards Sociocultural Understandings of Trauma-Informed
Praxis. Occasional Paper Series, (43)
▪ Gil, E. (2012). Trauma-focused integrated play therapy (TF-IPT). Handbook of child sexual abuse: Identification,
assessment, and treatment, 251-278.
▪ Brianna C. Delker , Rowan Salton & Kate C. McLean (2020) Giving Voice to Silence: Empowerment and
Disempowerment in the Developmental Shift from Trauma ‘Victim’ to ‘Survivor-Advocate’, Journal of Trauma &
Dissociation, 21:2, 242-263
▪ Kress, V. E., Hoffman, R., & Thomas, A. M. (2008). Letters from the future: The use of therapeutic letter writing in
counseling sexual abuse survivors. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(2), 105-118.
▪ Bath, H. (2008). The three pillars of trauma-informed care. Reclaiming children and youth, 17(3), 17-21.
▪ Arenson, M., & Forkey, H. (2023). Violence exposure and trauma-informed care. Pediatric Clinics, 70(6), 1183-1200.
▪ Saywitz, K. J., Mannarino, A. P., Berliner, L., & Cohen, J. A. (2002). Treatment for sexually abused children and
adolescents. Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development 2000-2001, 455-476.
▪ Sánchez-Meca, J., Rosa-Alcázar, A. I., & López-Soler, C. (2011). The psychological treatment of sexual abuse in children
and adolescents: A meta-analysis. International journal of clinical and health psychology, 11(1), 67-93.
▪ Pifalo, T. (2006). Art therapy with sexually abused children and adolescents: Extended research study. Art
Therapy, 23(4), 181-185.
▪ Pifalo, T. (2007). Jogging the cogs: Trauma-focused art therapy and cognitive behavioural therapy with sexually
abused children. Art Therapy, 24(4), 170-175.
▪ Greenwald, R. (2015). Child trauma handbook: A guide for helping trauma-exposed children and adolescents.
Routledge.
▪ Briere, J., & Scott, C. (2015). Complex trauma in adolescents and adults: Effects and treatment. Psychiatric
Clinics, 38(3), 515-527.
▪ Bartlett, J. D., & Steber, K. (2019). How to implement trauma-informed care to build resilience to childhood
trauma. trauma, 9(10).
▪ Ogawa, Y. (2004). Childhood trauma and play therapy intervention for traumatized children. Journal of Professional
Counseling: Practice, Theory & Research, 32(1), 19-29.
▪ LaMotte, J. (2011). Psychotherapeutic techniques and play therapy with children who experienced trauma: A review of
the literature. Undergraduate Review, 7(1), 68-72.
▪ Frances Waters DCSW and LMFT (2005) When Treatment Fails with Traumatized Children … Why?, Journal of Trauma
& Dissociation, 6:1, 1-8, DOI: 10.1300/J229v06n01_01
226
Additional Materials
A. Art-Based Methods for Developing and Shifting Trauma Narratives & Internalizations
(Excerpts and adaptations of activities adapted from Karp, C.L., Butler, T.L. (1996). Treatment Strategies for Abused Children—
From Victim to Survivor (Interpersonal Violence: The Practice Series). Sage Publications. USA).
Process:
• Explain to child: “Remembering everything that has happened is not easy. Remembering can be hard to do
because it is painful to think about things you wish didn’t happen. Sometimes when things are too scary, you
forget or “block” memories, which may make you think that nothing happened. Your dreams may be a way of
helping you remember scary things. Scary dreams or nightmares are very frightening, but if you let them,
they can help you learn more about things that have happened and about your feelings. So, we are going to
do some things that will help you learn how to talk about the things you remember, and about your
227
feelings…if you have scary dreams or nightmares, you could learn new ways to get help. If you have ‘monsters
that scare you, you may learn how to tame them and be more in charge.”
• Part 1: Invite child… “draw a picture about a dream that you can remember”.
• Part 2: Invite child… “draw a picture of a dream that made you happy.
• Part 3: Invite child… “draw a picture that made you feel scared”.
• “Part 5: Invite child…”draw a picture of a cartoon helper that can be your special helper or super power”.
Discussion:
• Each of the above pictures, parts 1,2,3, and 4 should be followed by a discussion to elicit a (coherent)
narrative of the traumatic event and how the child interpreted it, including the attributions that the child
may make, and emergent feelings…
o Tell me what the picture shows…who are these people? What is happening here?
o Acknowledge the child’s experience and feelings in each instance—also interjecting the narrative
with positive responses such as ‘how brave of you to…’ to help the child see other perspectives in
his/her story.
• With regard to part 5, discuss: Who is your hero? How can he/she help you reduce or deal with difficult
memories…help you when you feel scared?
Activity: Secrets
Objective:
• Helping to tell the difference between happy or fun and scary or worrying secrets.
• To use words to share scary secrets.
Process (A):
• Explain to the child: “It can be fun to be surprised, like at a surprise birthday party, that everyone has kept
secret. Safe secrets are fun to keep for a short period of time, like a surprise birthday party. Difficult or
unsafe secrets can make you feel worried—and its okay to tell someone you trust about the things that
make you feel scared or worried. It is important to know and understand the difference between fun
secrets and scary or worrying secrets…and we are going to talk more about this today”.
Samantha was 11 years old. She thought she was old enough to go to summer camp like her friends. Instead, her
mother told her that she was going to stay with her grandparents again. This made Samantha feel very upset. She
didn’t like going there anymore. The summer was a hard time for her mother because her mother and step-father got
divorced. She depended on her parents to watch Samantha and her younger sisters.
Samantha hated leaving her neighbourhood where she spent her time playing with her best friend, Jamie, who lived
in the same apartment building. She especially hated the “special” times when her grandfather would take her
fishing. It was there when he first touched her in her “private places”. He told her it was their “secret” and that no
228
one would believe her if she told. Samantha was confused. She used to like the special times they spent together but
wished he would not touch her that way anymore.
As Samantha packed to go to her grandparents, she wondered if her grandfather did anything like that to her
mother. She wondered if she should tell her mother. After all, this wasn’t a fun secret like Jamie’s birthday party.
*[Alternatively, use the “To Tell or Not to Tell” story from SAMVAD’s Child Sexual Abuse Prevention & Personal
Safety available at https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CSA-prevention-Module-7-12-
yrs-Activity-4.3-To-tell-or-not-to-tell-1.pdf ]
Discussion (A):
• What do you think Samantha should do? [What dis Pinky and Chintu finally do about the secret they had?
Was it a good idea?]
Process (B):
• Invite the child… “draw or write about how secrets make you feel”.
• Invite the child… “draw a picture of a place where you feel safe to share difficult secrets”.
• Invite the child… “draw a picture of people you can share your difficult secrets with.”
• Invite the child… “write or tell a story about a child who was afraid to tell his/her difficult secret…you can
begin with ‘Once upon a time…’”
Discussion (B):
• Explore the dynamics of threat and blackmail in the abuse process—helping the child to understand that
anyone who threatens us or tells us to keep secret that make us feel worried or scared is not a good
person.
• Explain to child:
• “Many times, people who hurt kids tell them “not to tell”. Sometimes they may say they will “hurt you,
hurt your family, or something terrible will happen”. When this happens, it can be very scary to use
words and actually tell someone your secret”.
• “But it is important for you to know that you are worth being loved, that your safety is important…so it
is helpful for you to tell the ‘scary secret’ to someone you trust…so that they can ensure that you are
safe and not hurt.”
• Discuss ‘safe people’ and safe spaces’ (in reference to the child’s drawings/ pictures) with whom the child
can share secrets with…why does the child feel safe in these spaces/ with these people?
229
• Explain to the child: “You may feel like it was your fault when others were hurting you. Their words and
actions may make you feel guilty and full of shame. It is not your fault when others make wrong choices and
hurt you. So today we are going to talk about this, so you realize that it is not your fault.”
• Invite the child… “draw a picture of who hurt you and what you would like to say about being
hurt.”
• Everybody wants to be cared for and loved. The problem is that not everyone knows how to show feelings
in healthy ways. Sometimes others end up saying or doing hurtful things.
• It is very confusing when someone you trust hurts you instead of keeping you safe. This person may even
have made you feel that it was your fault…and that you should be ashamed.
• But we are not responsible for the mean or hurtful things that others may sometimes do to us. So, you
don’t have to continue to worry about them or what happened…it was never your fault.
Process (A):
• Explain to the child: We have talked about your difficult and hurtful experiences, and also many of your
feelings about them. But you may have some more feelings about what happened. It is important to talk
about these feelings as you start to feel them…because they might make you feel ‘stuck’. But by using
words to talk about them, you can get ‘unstuck’.
• Ask child to…
o “Think about the things that make you feel sad. Make a list of them…or draw a picture of things that
make you sad.
o Complete the sentence: “I feel sad when…”
• Next, ask child to…
o “Think about the things that make you feel scared. Make a list of them…or draw a picture of things
that make you scared”.
o Complete the sentence: “I feel scared when…”
• Then, ask child to…
230
o “Think about the things that make you feel angry. Make a list of them…or draw a picture of things
that make you scared”.
o Complete the sentence: “I feel angry when…”
Discussion:
• Acknowledge the child’s feelings of sadness/fear/anger following each of the above activity processes.
• Tell the child that you are glad he/she is sharing some of these difficult feelings with you (though it’s never
easy to talk about difficult feelings).
• Explain how when we do not talk about these feelings, and we keep them within us (often pushing them
deeper and deeper, trying to avoid them), they never actually go away…and like a pressure cooker, if there
is no place for the steam to escape, will burst, we also ‘explode’ from time to time…bursting into tears, or
getting really angry, for instance.
• Explain that it is normal and legitimate to have such feelings when people have done mean and hurtful
things to us; that it is good to talk about these feelings as they arise…because talking about them helps us
get them out of our minds and bodies, little by little…and that’s how we also slowly start feeling better,
happier…and can move forward (leaving behind the painful things that happened).
Objective:
Using a creative counselling technique of having children/adolescents write letters—to themselves or others—
from a future context.
Process:
• Return to the childhood trauma that you remembered on the first day.
• Now write a letter to yourself…imagine that you have grown to be an older, and wiser person (about 5 to
10 years later).
o What do you think that this wonderful, older, wiser you would suggest to help the current/younger
you get through this current phase of your life?
o How would he/she tell you to view or understand the problem you have?
o What would she/he tell you to remember as you move ahead?
o What would he/she suggest that would be most helpful in healing from the past?
o What would he/she say to comfort you?
o How would he/ she tell you to take care of yourself and nurture yourself?
Alternative methods:
The child/adolescent may be asked to write a letter to a fictional friend who may have disclosed sexual abuse to
him/her. The letter may focus on: advice, suggestions, or support for use during the difficult period after
disclosure…the child’s learnings (through his/her own experiences) about abuse.
231
TF-CBT incorporates elements of cognitive-behavioural, attachment, exposure therapy, and family therapy models
to address the unique needs of trauma-affected children. It has been used successfully to treat children with a
variety of trauma experiences, including complex trauma. TF-CBT components are summarized by the acronym
PRACTICE: psychoeducation and parenting skills, relaxation, affective regulation, cognitive coping skills,
trauma narration, in vivo mastery8, conjoint child-parent sessions, and enhancing safety and future
development. Try out the activities (below) focussed on affective regulation and cognitive coping skills…(drawn
and adapted from Phifer, L.W., Sibbald, L.K. (2020). Social-Emotional Toolbox for Children & Adolescents—116
Worksheets and Skill Building Exercises to Support Safety, Connection and Empowerment. PESI Publishing and Media.
USA)
Objective:
Process:
• Explain to child: “When difficult or frightening events happen to us, the sounds, sights, smells that we
experienced at that time may come back to us at a later time, again and again. Usually, we see or hear or
smell something…or it could be people, places or actions… that reminds us of that painful time when we
felt unsafe…and then it feels as if the ‘danger’ event is going to happen all over again. Our mind and body
have certain reactions to this fear. Let us explore some of these triggers and reminders in your case…and
see if we can find some helpful ways to cope with them”.
• Ask the child to write or draw…What types of reminders or triggers cause uncomfortable or unsafe feelings
in you?
o Sounds (eg-loud voices, slamming of a door, the noise of a car…)
o People (eg-strangers, certain features of a person…)
o Places (eg- specific spaces…)
o Actions (eg- being unexpectedly touched on the shoulder…)
o Other triggers
• In each case, encourage the child to write or speak about, his/her reaction to the trigger…is it…
o Fight (eg- you (want to) refuse what you are being asked to do/ yell/scream/ hit someone/break or
throw things, hurt or harm yourself…)
o Flight (eg- you (want to) running away, hide, avoid the place or person, become restless, cannot
concentrate…)
o Freeze (eg- you feel stuck in a certain part of the body, feel cold or numb, physical stiffness or
heaviness of limbs, like it is difficult to breathe, feel faint, numb and withdrawn…)
8
helping the child overcome their avoidance of generalized reminders and work towards mastering more specific reminders i.e. developing
a hierarchy of reminders to work with the child to gradually master feared stimuli, working from least feared to most feared.
232
Discussion:
• Explain that in the aftermath of a difficult and traumatic event, it is but natural to have such feelings and
reactions.
• However, they may not always be helpful to us i.e. these feelings and reactions themselves may create
other problems for us. They might make us feel more uncomfortable or they might get in the way of our
daily activities (such as school and play) or make our inter-personal relationships (with family and friends)
difficult.
• It is therefore important to know and recognize these triggers or reminders…so that we can do something
at the time, to feel better i.e. safer or more comfortable/ less fearful.
• What can we do to try to feel better? Discuss activities that the child enjoys doing or what helps him/her
feel soothed or calmed…such as listening to music, doing some cooking, going for a walk, playing, drawing
and painting…(as age-appropriate and in accordance with child’s interests).
• Suggest or teach the child techniques of deep breathing and guided imagery.
You make a You get invited to a You are starting a You get into
new friend: party or picnic: new school: an argument:
Discussion (A& B)
• The child may be encouraged to post his/her emotions palette next to him/her bed or on the
refrigerator…where he/she can see it frequently.
• Explain to the child:
o Building an emotional vocabulary helps you convey better how you are feeling, to others.
o How different events and situations make us feel are personal to each of us—we each may feel
differently in a given situation.
o It is important to understand what feelings we have in different situations, so that we are then able
to think how best to express them…in ways that help us feel safe and comfortable, without also
hurting or upsetting others.
Discussion (C):
• Explain to the child that each situation and emotion thus also causes bodily reactions.
• Talk about the mind-body connection…and how the body also ‘feels’ the emotions that the mind is
thinking about. [You may also use the examples provided in the ‘First level Psychosocial Responses
module].
• This activity is also an opportunity to discuss dissociation with a child who might be experiencing this as a
trauma symptom—helping him/her understand how extreme fear and anxiety can cause such difficulties
i.e. that the body perse is not sick but that the emotions are causing the body to react in ways that make
the body faint or black-out or certain body parts hurt i.e. the painful emotions cause pain in the body.
• Discuss that there are ways to lessen the painful emotions so that the bodily reactions also become less
uncomfortable.
Objectives:
• Identifying the intensity of emotions.
• Coping with ‘big’ and difficult emotions.
Materials: Feelings thermometer chart (shown below); coping mechanism cards (provided below)
experience different degrees of feelings in different situations…especially when we have ‘big’ or difficult
feelings, like fear or anger.
• Present the following chart to the child—with a ‘feelings’ thermometer, which measures how high the level
of an emotion is (such as anger or fear).
Process (B):
• Explain to child: There are many things we can do to manage big or difficult emotions. We call these as
‘coping skills’—which are essentially tools we use to help us manage emotions and stay in control.
• Ask child to:
o Explore the list of coping skills provided on the cards.
o Use the feelings thermometer matrix created (above), and place the coping cards against each
feeling and situation—to try to get through the stressful time… “what coping skills would you use to
help you get through different intensities of emotion?”
o As the child places the coping cards, discuss why he/she is selecting a given activity to cope, how
and why this would help, including what (harmful) actions it may prevent the child from engaging
in.
236
Coping Cards
Playing with
Visualizing Using positive self-
‘fidget’ toys
calming statements… ‘I can
(crazy ball, clay) Journaling Punching a
spaces get through this…’
pillow
Visualizing
pleasant or happy
Other… Other…
experiences
create your own create your own Other…
create your own
237
Discussion:
• Discuss with child:
o When we are faced with challenging or upsetting situations, we use our coping skills to bring back
feelings of safety, calmness and control.
o Many times, in the absence of these coping skills, we tend to use other actions to cope—such as
yelling, screaming, breaking things…or self-harm and substances—in the hope that they will make
us feel better. While such actions may help us feel better, this is only temporary…and they then
create their own set of problems, making it even harder for us.
o That is why it is important to use coping skills that help us stay healthy, and that neither hurts us
nor others…such as the ones we have listed.
• Conclude the discussion by asking child to identify two most stressful feelings (in relation to current
experiences) and identifying two new coping skills he/she would like to use, and complete the statements
below:
o When I feel_______________I will__________________to be calm and in control.
o When I feel_______________I will__________________to be calm and in control.
Objective:
• To create a safe personal coping space, to relax, re-connect and re-charge.
Material:
Paper and colours/ crayons
Process:
• Tell child: “When we are confronted with difficult situations and events, or feelings, it often helps to have a
space where we can feel safe, relax and calm our feelings. Let’s design such a space for you today…”
• Ask child to use the paper and colouring materials to draw and design the space, using the following
prompts, as she/he works through it:
o Where would your space be? (At home/ at school/ somewhere else…)
o What colours would you want to decorate it with?
o What type of light would it have? (natural/dim or bright lighting…)
o What types of comfort items would you have? (toys, pillows, games, books…)
o What kind of furniture would you have?
o Would there be music? If so, what kind of music…?
o What kind of scents would you want? (The smell of fresh air, of scented candle or agarbatti…)
o Who might you (sometimes) allow into that space, to be with you?
o What activities would you do in this space?
o If you had to give this space a special name, what would it be?
Discussion:
• How do you think this space could help you?
• In what specific stressful situations would you use it?
• How do you think it might help with difficult events and feelings?
• The possibility of actually creating this space in the child’s home…
[Note: This activity is best done with children who have the opportunity and resources to create such a space].
238
Objective:
• To facilitate emotional containment and stress relief expressing creativity.
Material: Black and white print-outs of mandalas (plenty freely available on the internet!), colouring materials
(crayons/ colour pencils)
Note to facilitator: Mandalas are circular geometric designs with repeating patterns. They are often used for
meditation (in the traditions of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism or Japanese lifestyle of Shintoism), and symbolize a
feeling of wholeness. Carl Jung said that a mandala symbolizes “a safe refuge of inner reconciliation and wholeness”.
Colouring mandalas is an art therapy technique, aimed at relieving stress, and increasing focus through enabling
creative expression. Colouring mandalas is often used therefore, as a method to reduce stress in the context of
anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder.
Process:
Provide child with a black and white image of a mandala.
Explain to child: “What you see is a type of figure called a mandala. A mandala is a circular figure—in fact the word
mandala, in Sanskrit, means circle. So, as you can see, mandalas are special circles that have unique meanings—
because each mandala has different patterns. Mandalas can use different colours, but they all have something in
common—symmetry…which means that if you fold this image in half, both parts will mirror one another.
Ask child to colour it in…slowly, with the use of as many colours as possible, perhaps with a plan to use colours in
ways that are balanced or symmetric (although not necessarily so).
239
Discussion:
• Help the child understand the colouring of mandalas as an emotional regulation strategy by explaining
how:
o Colouring a mandala requires much patience and focus…which means that we have to concentrate
and be very much in the present (as opposed to letting the mind wander to other things).
o Sometimes, when we are emotionally upset or stressed, colouring in a mandala helps to feel slowly
calmer and more relaxed, and more in control of our feelings.
o Because we need to pay close attention to the design of the mandala, and the colours we are using,
colouring it in helps us concentrate better, also moving the mind away from other disturbing
thoughts.
240
• Enabling them to understand and apply personal safety concepts in day-to-day life.
• Enabling them to recognize sexual abuse if and when it takes place and report the same.
• In case of sexual abuse, enabling children to provide narrative, on child sexual abuse in a gentle and non-
threatening manner and then provide them with personal safety education in order to keep safe in future.
Time
4.5 hours
Concept
The World Health Organization (WHO) defines Life Skills as “adaptive and positive behaviour that enable
individuals to deal effectively with the demands and challenges of everyday life.” Core life skills for the promotion
of child and adolescent mental health include: decision-making, problem-solving, creative thinking, critical
thinking, effective communication, inter-personal relationship skills, self-awareness, empathy, coping with stress
and emotions.
In recognition of the importance of life skills and with a view to making it accessible to all children and
adolescents, the WHO2 and other national initiatives advocated strongly for life skills education to be made
available in schools, through training of teachers and as part of school mental health programs 3. See table below
on details and specifics of life skills domains.
241
Material: None
Process:
• Ask one participant to volunteer (before the session begins and do not explain anything
to the participants yet)
• Ask the volunteer to sit with a slouch and hand on the forehead at a place where
participants can see them as they enter the room.
• As participants enter the room just allow them to observe this person.
Discussion:
• Ask the participants what do they think would have happened to this person?
• Collect as many responses as possible.
• Explain that in this instance they could all be correct and there is no right or wrong
answer.
• Explain that there are no correct answers. Because all of them shared their perceptions
about what they saw.
• Explain that life skills education is about collaborative construction of knowledge
through integration of multiple perceptions/ perspectives
Every child comes from difficult and traumatic circumstances; each child is unique in that he/she has his/her own
story, is impacted again, in unique ways. The life skills approach takes into consideration the fact that children in
similar contexts have different processes
and outcomes and conversely, children
with the same manifest issues come from
different contexts. This approach therefore
helps recognizing this ‘equation’ to
effectively construct interventions. Second,
given that all children in difficult
circumstances require psychosocial
assistance and, that resources are scarce,
providing individual interventions to each
child is not possible. Trained personnel,
with the knowledge and skills on how to
deal with children’s issues, especially with
complex and difficult problems, are
especially scarce and have resulted in
inappropriate and unhelpful responses to
children, on the part of caregivers and child
care agency staff. As a result, many children
242
requiring assistance to deal with the difficult psychosocial contexts they are in and come from, do not receive it.
Further, most mental child health problems (except for those such as psychosis and those caused by organic
factors or physiological problems) may also be viewed as life skill deficits. For instance, violent and abusive
behaviours result from children’s inability to regulate emotions, negotiate inter-personal relationships and/or
resolve conflicts in alternative or creative ways; thus, the objective of any therapeutic work with such children will
be to enable them to acquire the life skills to manage anger and aggression—in other words, to manage emotions,
develop creative thinking, problem-solving and conflict resolution (life) skills. Children in difficult circumstances (as
discussed above), exposed to experiences of deprivation and abuse from early childhood, develop emotional and
behaviour problems which may also be viewed as being created by life skill deficits i.e. due to their difficult
circumstances, children have not learnt certain life skills, and that results in emotional and behaviour problems.
These life skill deficits, if not addressed, then exacerbate emotional and behaviour problems, increasing the risk for
more serious and chronic mental health disorders. The Life Skills approach, only can be used with an individual
child but also uses group intervention approaches, therefore ensures that larger numbers of children receive
psychosocial assistance to address their emotional and behaviour problems by helping children build the life skills
that they may lack.
Severe emotional deprivation and difficult family contexts may have led them to seek out relationships of love and
sexuality either with their peers or older adolescents or adults—in such cases, while there is apparent ‘consent’,
they are not always cognizant of the health and psychosocial risks of their sexual behaviours and decisions and are
thus vulnerable to abuse and serious health consequences. Many of these children have received little supervision
and have not been engaged in discussions on how to make choices about relationships and sexuality.
Finally, it is important to mention here that sex education (as it is called in schools and institutions that pride
themselves on conducting such programs) is very different from life skills education and training on sexuality and
relationship issues: the former merely imparts information about the body and physiological processes of
reproduction, usually in a manner that is didactic (teacher to student or parent to child); the latter may include
some discussions of physiology, especially on parts that pertain to health and safety, but the emphasis is on the
socio-emotional component of sexuality. This includes an understanding not just issues related to safety but also
emotion such as attraction and love, of relationship contexts, for instance, based on which recognition of abuse
and coercion take place; and the learning of skills such as assertiveness and refusal (‘saying ‘no’ to sexual overtures
if desired), or negotiation (for condom use and safe sex), and problem-solving (coping with peer pressure that
compels an adolescent to experiment with sexual acts
243
Life Skills…
Cooperation and Teamwork • Expressing respect for others' contributions and different styles
• Assessing one's own abilities and contributing to the group
• Relaxation techniques
245
One aspect of psychosocial assistance to such children is curative work with children who have suffered abuse; the
other is preventive work, through equipping children with life skills to protect themselves from abuse and other
psychosocial problems. While many agencies attempt to impart life skills (and state that they do life skills group
activities with children) on issues such as sexuality and relationships, they appear to follow didactic positions,
adopted as a result of their personal opinions and
viewpoints. This contradicts the essence of life
skill promotion work—which entails that all
individuals participate equally in the production
of knowledge, and that this is a continuous
dialogue; and that learners are the subject, not
the object, of the process. What this means is that
life skill development is not about articulating
one’s own positions and convincing the
adolescent to adopt the same beliefs; it is about
adopting an open stance (despite one’s own
experiences and personal opinions) and creating
a space for debate and discussion, so that
adolescents can examine and analyse an issue or
situation from multiple view points and come to
their own conclusions on what might be the best
course of actions. In this, the use of creative
methods such as stories and narratives, theatre and other art forms, help create the life situations and contexts
(such as marriage, sexuality, conflict etc) that form the basis of the discussion. Let us now try some life skills
activities, and see how these issues can be discussed using a window approach framework.
We do not advocate the use of ‘good touch and bad touch’ or ‘safe and unsafe touch’ approaches to
sexual abuse prevention because the so-called ‘bad touch’ can feel good and right to children or
adolescents; in certain situations, especially where abuse entails lure and manipulation or complex
grooming processes, children and adolescents can find it exceedingly difficult to distinguish between
‘good and bad touch’; promoting sexual touch as ‘bad touch’ negatively impacts the development of
affirmative sexuality i.e. children and adolescents should not associate sexuality as being a ‘bad or
negative’ as this will have other harmful consequences on their relationships, health and happiness
in the future.
246
Material: Activity Sheets provided under additional materials (for the convenience of the facilitators
some activities have been selected for the purpose of demonstration. These are drawn from
SAMVAD’s Life Skills manuals designed for different age groups. The Life skills manuals have several
more activities of this nature, which can be chosen for the demonstration purposes)
• Child Sexual Abuse Prevention & Personal Safety (Pre Schoolers and Children with
Developmental Disabilities)
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CSA_Prevention-
Preschool__Disability_Kids.pdf
Method: Demonstration
• Divide the participants into groups. Divide the groups based on the number of participants
available. Ensure there are at least 3 participants in each group.
• Ask the participants to go through the activity sheets provided. Give about 20 minutes to
prepare for demonstration.
• Ask them to use the aids provided with the activity for the demonstration, encourage them to
use their own creative ideas to develop aids. (provide them with art material- sketch pens,
glue, chart papers, colours, scissors etc. if required)
• Tell the participants that-
o They are required to facilitate the activity exactly as they would with children.
o During the demonstration all the other participants will be children.
o Ask them to introduce the activity, give instructions and follow the discussion points/
questions as set out in each activity.
• Cap the activity with some ‘meta-processing’ i.e. comments pertaining to the use of a certain
type of methodology, or to content (also linking it to concepts discussed thus far in the
training program).
247
248
Suggested Readings
▪ WHO, Life Skills Education for Children and Adolescents in Schools: Introduction and Guidelines to
Facilitate the Development and Implementation of Life Skills Programs. 1997, World Health Organization:
Geneva.
▪ Bharath, S., Kumar, K. Life Skill Education--The Indian Scene. in 5th Biennial Conference, Indian Association
of Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 1999. NIMHANS, Bangalore
▪ Ramaswamy, S., & Seshadri, S. (2019). Methodologies and skills in child and adolescent mental health,
psychosocial care, and protection: A repository of training and intervention materials. Indian Journal of
Psychiatry, 61(3), 226.
▪ Murthy, C. V. (2016). Issues, problems and possibilities of life skills education for school going
adolescents. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3), 56-76.
▪ Mahanta, P., Deuri, S. P., & Sobhana, H. (2021). Importance of Life Skills Education among
Adolescents. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 403-406.
▪ Murphy-Graham, E., & Cohen, A. K. (2022). Life Skills Education for Youth in Developing Countries: What
Are They and Why Do They Matter?. Life skills education for youth: Critical perspectives, 13-41.
▪ Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: Empirical findings and future directions. Journal of
primary prevention, 25, 211-232.
▪ Singla, D. R., Waqas, A., Hamdani, S. U., Suleman, N., Zafar, S. W., Saeed, K., ... & Rahman, A. (2020).
Implementation and effectiveness of adolescent life skills programs in low-and middle-income countries: A
critical review and meta-analysis. Behaviour research and therapy, 130, 103402.
▪ Clark, H. B., & Crosland, K. A. (2009). Social and life skills development: Preparing and facilitating youth for
transition into young adults. In Achieving permanence for older children and youth in foster care (pp. 313-
336). Columbia University Press.
▪ Duerden, M. D., Witt, P. A., Fernandez, M., Bryant, M. J., & Theriault, D. (2012). Measuring life skills:
Standardizing the assessment of youth development indicators. Journal of youth development, 7(1), 99-117.
▪ Pick, S., Givaudan, M., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2003). Sexuality and life skills education: A multistrategy
intervention in Mexico. American psychologist, 58(3), 230.
▪ Lee, G. Y., & Lee, D. Y. (2019). Effects of a life skills-based sexuality education programme on the life-skills,
sexuality knowledge, self-management skills for sexual health, and programme satisfaction of
adolescents. Sex Education, 19(5), 519-533.
▪ Chavula, M. P., Svanemyr, J., Zulu, J. M., & Sandøy, I. F. (2022). Experiences of teachers and community
health workers implementing sexuality and life skills education in youth clubs in Zambia. Global Public
Health, 17(6), 926-940.
▪ Lee, G. Y., & Lee, D. Y. (2019). Effects of a life skills-based sexuality education program on Korean early
adolescents. Social Behaviour and Personality: an international journal, 47(12), 1-11.
▪ Buckley-Willemse, B. (2005). Sexuality education and life-skills acquisition in secondary schools: guidelines
for the establishment of health promoting schools (Doctoral dissertation, North-West University).
▪ Ganji, J., Emamian, M. H., Maasoumi, R., Keramat, A., & Khoei, E. M. (2017). The existing approaches to
sexuality education targeting children: A review article. Iranian journal of public health, 46(7), 890.
249
Additional Materials
Note: The activities 8.8, 8.5, 8.8, 10.3 from the Gender, Sexuality & Relationships Manual are described below.
Each activity first describes the Methods and Materials it will use; and then lays out the Process or the steps to
be followed on how to implement the activity; the process is followed by Discussion which provides questions for
discussing and processing the activity and summarizing thoughts and learning derived from the activity. While the
modules from the life skills manuals are best used in chronological order, they can also be used as stand-alone
modules, in case the facilitator urgently requires to address one or another issue first. The activities are
accompanied by a set of materials, including film clips.
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention & Personal Safety (Pre Schoolers and Children with Developmental
Disabilities)
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CSA_Prevention-Preschool__Disability_Kids.pdf
250
Process:
Note 1: This activity is for children who have not yet (completely) learnt the names of all
their body parts i.e. it is a first level activity for children who do not know their body parts.
Note 1: Do NOT use technical terms for private parts—use the term(s) that children use. They need to be
comfortable with the term and understand what is being referred to. Allow for some giggling/ laughter as children
name their private parts.
251
Note 2: The frequent repeating of the names of private parts helps children discard their inhibitions and
discomfort related to these parts and gradually become more confident about viewing them with the same
objectivity and comfort as other body parts. To be able to name private parts comfortably is critical in child sexual
abuse reporting—children are often unable to report sexual abuse because they either do not have the words for
private parts or because they do not have the comfort to name these parts.
Alternative Method: For children who find it difficult to directly explain how each body part is used, you can
reverse the above method—state a function and ask which body part does it— for example: which part do we see
with? Which part receives our food once we eat it? Which part helps us walk?
• We use our Mouth, Lips, Tongue to talk, eat, sing, blow balloons/ bubbles etc.
• We use our Nose to breath, smell different things (what is cooking in the kitchen, recognize different flowers
such as rose/ jasmine...)
• We use our Ears to hear (noises, music, and people calling or talking…), wear earrings.
• We use our Eyes to see… (Beautiful things such as…?)
• We use our Hands/Arms to dance, to hold things, to eat…
• We use our Fingers to write, paint, colour…
• We use our Thighs/ Knees/Legs/ toes to walk, run, and climb up and down, dance and play…
• The Food we eat goes into our stomach.
• We use our penis/Vagina (or whatever words/ terms children use for these parts) to pee.
• We use our bottom/buttocks to sit and to do potty.
252
Materials: Pictures detailing: road safety, fire safety, kitchen safety, Doors/window locks…
Process:
• Make the children sit in a circle. Tell them will show you few pictures of children doing different things; for
each picture I show you, tell me whether the person will get hurt doing what he/she is doing...and so, is it safe
unsafe?"
• Show them the safety pictures, one by one and ask :
o What is the person doing here?
o Will he/she get hurt? (yes/ no)
o So, is what she is doing safe or unsafe? (if the person gets hurt, it means he is unsafe; if he does not get
hurt, it means he is safe).
o What happens if we...
▪ ...touch the fire/stove?
▪ ...stick our fingers or any object into an electrical outlet or play with wires?
▪ …go very near to the well?
▪ …cross the road without looking to see if vehicles are coming?
▪ …play on the road?
▪ …do not put our toys and things away?
▪ …play with sharp objects such as knives, blades, etc.
▪ …do not lock the door at night?
▪ …open the door without looking to see who is outside first?
▪ …do not put the strap on while sitting in the wheelchair?
▪ …do not place pillows while lying on the bed?
▪ …do not walk down stairs using railing/ we slide down the banisters?
▪ …put our hand into a dog’s mouth?
• Provide information on why we should not do certain actions/ why it would not be safe. (See Box).
• Summarize how we follow many safety rules to keep our bodies from getting hurt.
253
Introduce the Session/ Topic: “We have learnt how to keep our bodies safe from getting hurt because of fire and
switches and knives. Now let us talk about safety in a different way—about keeping ourselves safe from some
people who may not be very good. There are many good people in this world—and we trust or believe them
because they will not do things that will make children/others feel scared or hurt. But is everyone good? Can we
trust everyone? [Children likely to say ‘no’] So, there are some people who may not be good and whom we cannot
trust or believe because they do things that make children/ others feel hurt or worried. Today, we will talk about
how we can keep ourselves safe from bad people whom we cannot trust or believe.”
Process:
• Tell children: “There are some people we meet everyday—people who look after us, play with us and we
know very well. Like who all…? Let us now talk about how to be safe from people we do not know
• Tell the story ‘When Somu Forgot the Stranger Safety Rules’—showing the children pictures as you narrate.
• Discuss the following questions:
o What was a name of the boy (in the story)?
o Who did Somu live with?
o Where was his house?
o Who was Somu’s best friend? And what all did they do together?
o Who came along one day when Somu and Tommy were playing in the park? Did Somu and Tommy
know him?
o What did the man tell Somu?
o And what did Somu say/ do?
o What was Tommy thinking at that time?
o Where did the man take Somu? What happened there?
o How did Somu feel when the man took him to some unknown place?
o What happened next?
o What safety rules about strangers had Somu forgotten?
o So, what do we now know about keeping safe from strange people?
Once upon a time, there was a boy called Somu. He lived with his parents and dog, Tommy, in a
house that was on a busy street but also near a park. Tommy was a little brown dog with long silky
ears and golden brown eyes; he was a happy, friendly dog and really loved his master, Somu.
Somu and Tommy were best friends. They played ball together and went swimming in the nearby
pond; Somu always shared his biscuits and ice-cream with Tommy and Tommy even followed
Somu to school and back.
One day, Somu and Tommy were playing in the park. Suddenly, a man came to them and started
to talk to Somu.
“Hi, what a nice ball,” he said to Somu. “Can I play too?”
Somu smiled and agreed for the man to play with them.
Tommy wondered why Somu was talking to a stranger. Didn’t he remember what Somu’s mother
had told him about talking to strangers? That it was not safe to talk to people you did not know.
A few minutes later, the man had persuaded Somu to go to the toy shop with him and eat some
ice-cream after. As Somu walked away with the strange man, Tommy became very worried. He
decided to follow them. The man did not notice Tommy walking behind them and Somu was too
excited as he was thinking about the toyshop and the ice-cream treat.
After a while, Somu realized that they were not walking towards the market at all. Instead they
were in some strange street that he did not recognize. “I don’t think that there is any toy shop or
ice-cream parlour here,” said Somu doubtfully. The stranger said nothing and Somu was starting
to feel very nervous and afraid. Where were they going? Where was this man taking him?
At last, they reached a broken-down old building. The man told Somu to sit on the bench outside
and wait for him. Suddenly, he did not sound as nice and friendly as he had seemed in the park.
Somu sat down upon the bench and started to cry.
“I want to go home, to mummy and daddy,” he cried. ‘I am scared…and I don’t really know this
man…I am lost now.”
Just then Tommy bounded up. Somu cried out in relief and hugged his dog. “O Tommy, I am so
glad you are here…”, he said.
Tommy started to pull at Somu’s shirt. “O I see…you know the way home and can take us back!”
said Somu. “Come on Tommy, let us run…let us go quickly before that strange man comes back.”
And so, Somu and Tommy ran all the way back home, where Somu’s parents were starting to get
255
very worried about them. “Where were you?” asked his mother. Somu told his parents what had
happened at the
park that morning and where all he had been after, how afraid he had been all alone with a
stranger.
“So you forgot the safety rule about not talking to strangers…about never going anywhere with
them even if they offer you sweets and toys,” said his father.
“Yes,” said Somu sadly. “But Tommy knew and remembered the rule. That is why he followed me—
to protect me from any hurt or harm that may have happened to me.”
So, clever Tommy was given many hugs and an extra special biscuit for helping Somu to be safe.
And from then on, Somu always remembered the 3 safety rules about strangers:
• NEVER talk to strangers!
• NEVER go anywhere with them (or take rides with them)!
• NEVER accept offers of toys or sweets from them!
“Yes,” said Somu sadly. “But Tommy knew and remembered the rule. That is why he followed me—
to protect me from any hurt or harm that may have happened to me.”
256
Process:
• Tell the children that we are going to continue talking about people safety and learn what to do in case
someone hurts us.
• Tell the story ‘Tommy’s New Neighbour’—showing the children pictures as you narrate.
o What exciting news did Somu’s father give him one day?
o Who moved into the house next door to Somu’s?
o Did the two families become friends? How do we know that?
o Who was not happy? And why?
o Was Bozo nice to Tommy in the beginning? How do we know that?
o What happened later to make Tommy unsure of Bozo’s friendship?
o How did Tommy feel when Bozo did not treat him well?
o What happened next about Tommy’s breakfast? Where was it disappearing? And how did that
affect Tommy?
o When Tommy caught Bozo eating up all his food, what did Bozo tell him?
o How did Tommy manage to tell Somu about Bozo?
o Was it a good thing that Tommy told Somu about Bozo? What would have happened if he had
not?
o What did Somu’s mother say about when we can trust people we know and when we cannot, even
though we know them? (How do we know whether some known person is good or not?)
o So, what have we learnt about trusting people we know?
(Note: Given the age of the children, they may require some prompting and repetition—the above questions are a
broad guideline on what issues to touch on for learning and discussion).
Summarize:
o Most people we know or our families know/ are friends with are good people and we can trust
them.
o A few people, however, may not be good and cannot be trusted.
o When people we know, try to hurt us or threaten us, then we know they are not good people and
we must not trust them (like what Bozo did to Tommy).
o In case someone we know does things that are hurtful to us, it is important to tell someone about it
(like Tommy told Somu)—so that the hurt can stop and you can be safe.
Note: This part of the module may be appropriate only for children with mild intellectual disability i.e. those who
have greater degrees of cognitive impairment may not be able to comprehend these stories.
257
The house next door to Somu’s house had been empty for a long time. “I wish someone nice
would move in there, so I could have someone to play with,” Somu would keep saying.
One day, Somu’s father came home and called out to him: “Hey Somu, I have news for you…a
family has moved into the house next door! They have a girl who is your age—her name is Leela--
so you have someone to play with…and guess what! They even have a dog…so Tommy can have a
new friend too!”
Somu’s parents and Leela’s parents became good friends. Their fathers would meet and talk about
gardening sometimes, their mothers would go shopping together. Somu and Leela also became
very good friends: they went to the same school and played hide-and-seek in the park or watched
cartoons together at home. So, everyone was happy…except for Tommy.
The next door dog, Bozo was bigger and stronger than Tommy. At first, he seemed very friendly—
he would wag his tail when Tommy went over with Somu. He and Tommy would both play ball
and hide and seek with Somu and Leela. In fact, Tommy thought Bozo was a kind and friendly dog
and liked him very much.
But after a while, Tommy began to wonder whether Bozo was really as friendly and nice as he
seemed. Once he ate up Somu’s biscuit when he was not looking and Somu scolded Tommy for it,
thinking it was his dog who had done it. When they played ball, Bozo who had been gentle and
playful before began to push Tommy in a rough and hurtful way, especially when Somu was not
looking. Tommy felt sad and confused. “Doesn’t Bozo like me? Why does he hurt me like this?”
thought Tommy.
One day, Tommy went to eat his breakfast and found his food bowl empty. He was very surprised
as he knew he had not yet eaten his porridge and could not imagine how it had disappeared.
Somu and his parents would never have forgotten to fill his bowl. This continued to happen—each
morning, his porridge would be missing and poor Tommy would be hungry. Since Tommy got
little to eat these days, he grew thinner and more tired and Somu could not understand why.
Then, one morning, when Tommy went to eat his breakfast, he was just in time to see Bozo eating
up the last of his porridge. “So it is you who has been eating my breakfast everyday! How could
you do that? I thought you were my friend!” said Tommy.
“I am no friend of your’s…you thought wrong,” laughed Bozo, showing his big white teeth. “And if
you let Somu know that I eat your breakfast, I will fight you…and you know I am bigger and
stronger that you…so, be careful! And Somu will never believe you if you tell him—he likes me!”
Tommy retreated in a hurry and sat under Somu’s bed all day, for fear that Bozo would hurt him.
Somu could not understand why Tommy no longer came out to play with him or went to the park
or followed him to school. He saw that Tommy looked sad and scared these days. “What’s the
matter, Tommy? Something seems to be wrong…” said Somu.
258
The next day, Tommy decided that Somu must know the truth. So, knowing when Bozo would
come to eat his breakfast, Tommy pulled at Somu’s shoelace until Somu got up from the breakfast
table and followed him outside. And there was Bozo, eating Tommy’s porridge. “Bad dog,” said
Somu to Bozo. “So, that is why Tommy seems thin and hungry and sad all the time!”
Somu told Leela about Bozo’s being mean and nasty to Tommy. Leela was also angry with her dog
and punished him—Bozo was not allowed outside to play for several days and all his favorite
foods were taken away from him.
“And to think that we thought Bozo was a good, friendly dog!” said Somu. “Sometimes even
people we think we know and believe to be nice can be hurtful and unsafe. Am so glad that
Tommy told me about Bozo— else, we would never have known how mean he was being to
Tommy. But how do we know then who to trust and whom not to trust?”
“When people we know start to do mean or hurtful things…things that make us feel sad or
confused or upset, we know then that they are not good people…and cannot be trusted”, said
Somu’s mother. “Sometimes they may seem friendly and nice but do things that are hurtful—just
like Bozo did when Tommy thought he was friendly and nice. But most people we know are nice—
it’s just some people who might be like that.”
“Now I have learnt that even people I know can be unsafe,” thought Tommy. “But as Somu’s
mother said, that’s not everyone…and I know now how to be safe, so I need not worry. And am
glad I told Somu…if I had not told him, he would not have known Bozo was hurting me.” And so,
safe and happy now, Tommy fell asleep at Somu’s feet.
Process:
• Tell children: “There are some people we meet everyday—people who look after us, play with us and we
know very well. Like who all…? Let us now talk about how to be safe from people we do not know.
• Tell the story ‘Which Secrets to Keep’—showing the children pictures as you narrate.
• Discuss the following questions:
o What is a secret?
o What plans had Somu made for his mother’s birthday?
o Why did he want it to be a secret?
o Who were the only two other people who knew about Somu’s secret plans for his mother’s
birthday?
o Who came along when Tommy was sitting by the gate? What were they talking about?
o Why did they want Tommy to keep their plans secret?
259
o What did they tell Tommy he would get if he kept the secret?
o What did they tell Tommy that they would do to him if he did not keep the secret?
o Did Tommy decide to keep their secret or not? Why?
o What did Tommy do that night? How did he make sure that Somu and his parents were safe?
o Somu had a secret plan about his mother’s birthday surprise. The thieves had a secret plan to rob
Somu’s house. So, both had a secret. What was the difference? Which one was a good secret and
which one was not?
o What have we learnt about good and bad secrets?
Summarize:
• Secrets can be good and fun (like Somu’s plans for his mother’s birthday).
• Secrets can also be bad and unsafe (like the thieves’ plan to rob Somu’s house and hurt his family).
• When people want us to be part of good secrets, there is no problem—because we know that at the end,
we as well as others will be happy and no one will get hurt.
• When people want us to be part of bad secrets, there is a problem—because we know that at the end, we
as well as others might get hurt and be unhappy.
• When people threaten to hurt us if we refuse to keep the secret, we know surely that they are bad people
and we should not trust them (just like the thieves said they would hit Tommy with a stick if he told them
their secret plans).
• When people say they will give us something nice, something we like, like sweets or toys to keep ‘bad’
secrets, we know then also that they are bad people (just like Tommy knew when the thieves said they will
give him a box of his favorite biscuits if he kept their ‘bad’ secret).
• So, if someone tells us a ‘bad’ secret, it is important to tell someone we trust (just like Tommy always tells
Somu, whom he trusts). If we do not tell ‘bad’ secrets, then we ourselves or others may get hurt or not be
safe.
Somu’s mother’s birthday was coming up. He was very excited because he had planned a party and present for
her. The best part of this was that it was a secret! He had not told her about it because he wanted it to be a
surprise for her. He kept imagining how surprised and happy she would be when she opened the box and saw
her new pink saree and when all the guests arrived along with the birthday cake that had been ordered for the
evening! Only two others were in on the secret—Dad,
because he was helping with organizing the birthday surprise plans and Tommy because…well, Tommy and
Somu were best friends and Somu always told Tommy everything!
The day before Somu’s mother’s birthday, while Somu was at school, Tommy was sitting outside the house,
near the gate, when two strange men came by. They did not notice Tommy as they whispered to each other,
pointing to the house.
“Yes, so we will come tonight…at around midnight so that the family is fast asleep…” said one.
“We can break in through the side door—it looks a little old so it should be easy to get in that way,” said the
other. “And if the family and the kid give us any trouble as we steal all the stuff in the house, we will just hit
260
Tommy pricked up his ears when he heard their conversation, especially the last part about the stealing and the
family being hurt…someone was going to hit his beloved Somu??
Suddenly they noticed Tommy but did not realize that he belonged to the house they were going to rob and
the family they were planning to hurt. The first man laughed and said “aha, you silly dog…so you heard our
secret! You better not tell…it is a secret…if you don’t tell, I will give you a large box of your favourite biscuits.”
“And if you tell, we will smack you on the head with a heavy stick”, said the other one.
Tommy felt afraid…and confused. What did they mean that it was a secret? Weren’t secrets supposed to be
good things? Just like Somu’s secret about his mother’s birthday surprise? What kind of secret was this then—
these strange people were planning to steal stuff and hurt people? Was he supposed to really keep it a secret
when he knew that Somu’s house was going to be robbed and Somu and his family were going to be hurt??
Of course not!! This was not the kind of secret he was going to keep—not for a bag of his favorite biscuits and
not even if anyone threatened to hurt him! In fact, if these strange men were going to do bad things like
stealing and hurting people, Tommy thought, he must certainly not keep their secret!
And so, that night, Tommy did not go to sleep as usual on Somu’s bed. He sat by the window and kept watch—
long after Somu was asleep, and his parents had gone to bed. At about midnight, Tommy heard a noise and
saw two men come down the road—the thieves he had seen yesterday, the ones who had told him to keep a
bad secret. He started to bark loudly until Somu and his parents woke up and came running to see what the
matter was. Standing by Tommy, Somu’s father saw the two thieves approach the house. He immediately called
the police—and within minutes, the police car was at their house and the two thieves, who had been hiding in
the bushes near the gate, were caught.
Tommy was petted by the family and given his favourite food the next day. “Clever dog,” said Somu’s mother.
“I wonder how he knew the thieves were going to come,” said Somu. And Tommy thought to himself: “I heard
them plan…and knew their secret. But their secret was not a safe or good secret and so I did not keep it.”
That evening, Tommy watched Somu and his father give his mother the surprise birthday present, and the
guests and cake arrive for the surprise party. Somu’s mother was excited and happy… “I never knew you had
planned all this!” she said. “It was a secret,” said Somu.
“A very good secret”, thought Tommy. “Because no one got hurt and everyone was happy!”
Materials: 2 sets of picture cards: i) Picture cards detailing daily activities that children
usually engage in: eating, sleeping, brushing teeth, bathing, combing hair, dressing,
undressing, going to toilet, singing, dancing, studying, playing;
261
ii) Picture cards showing people children know and encounter in their daily lives, namely
mother/ father/ aunt/ uncle/ sister/ brother/ teacher/school cleaner/doctor/ male &; female
caretakers in an institution...
Process:
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CSA_Prevention_Module_7_12-
yrs_Oct_2017.pdf
Materials: Large sheets of paper taped together to create a single surface (large enough to fit a child’s body on it);
crayons/colour pens
Process:
• Introduction to Session: “Last time, we did fun shapes and actions with our bodies. Now, we will talk a little
more about our bodies. We will learn different parts, what we do with them and how to protect them”.
• Introduce the idea of maps and outlines to children—telling them what they are. Tell them that we are now
going to do an outline of our body.
• Ask a child volunteer to lie down on the large piece of paper on the floor: another outlines the shape of
the body.
• Name/label all the visible body parts—as many as the children can name (according to age).
• When they are done, ask the children to look
• Make sure to name the private parts—whatever name the children give them.
Note: Do NOT use technical terms for private parts—use the term(s) that children use. They need to be comfortable
with the term and understand what is being referred to. Allow for some giggling/ laughter as children name their
private parts and acknowledge that people find it funny or embarrassing to mention these parts.
263
Material: None
Process:
• Tell the children: “Now that we have identified all our visible body parts and know their names, we are
going to do a quick revision of the same by playing a speed name game. I will point to a body part and
you have to name it…really quickly.”
• Stand where all group members can see you clearly.
• Point to various body parts, one at a time, allowing them to name each part.
• Frequently point to private parts such as vagina/penis/breast/buttocks so that the names of these parts are
clear and children know them. (But ensure that you do not point to them continuously i.e. the
naming/pointing of these parts must be interspersed with other body parts).
Note: The frequent repeating of the names of private parts helps children discard their inhibitions and discomfort
related to these parts and gradually become more confident about viewing them with the same objectivity and
comfort as other body parts. To be able to name private parts comfortably is critical in child sexual abuse reporting—
children are often unable to report sexual abuse because they either do not have the words for private parts or
because they do not have the comfort to name these parts.
Materials: Board game, dice, pawns (as many pawns as children or teams in case of many children)
Process:
• Tell the children: “We have been talking about how to protect our bodies in certain ways, such as personal
hygiene and eating nutritious food. By doing these things, we protect our bodies from dirt and diseases. In
addition to this, there are other ways in which we protect our bodies—some basic safety rules we follow.
Let us play a game to know more about general safety rules.”
• Place board game on the floor/ table and have the children sit around it. (If there are many children, they
could be divided into teams of 3 to 4 per team).
• Ask each child/ team to select a pawn.
• Ask each child/ team to take turns to throw the dice and move along the boxes.
• When a box with a safety message/ instruction is reached, discuss the safety rule with the children, asking
them what they think about it/ why the rule is important/ what will happen if they do not follow that rule.
there are some people who may not be good or trustworthy. Today, we will talk about how we can keep
ourselves safe from bad and untrustworthy people.”
• Tell the story about Chintu and Pinky.
• Discuss the following questions:
o What were the names of the children/ rabbits?
o What was the relationship between them?
o They played together and had many similar interests. But what was one difference between them?
o What did Chintu tell Pinky about her talking to strangers?
o What did their father show Pinky and tell her?
o After what her father told her, how did Pinky feel at night? Why?
o What was her response to Chintu’s invitation the following morning, to play in the park?
o How did Pinky finally decide to go to play in the park?
o Chintu and Pinky did something very important before going to the park. What was that?
o When they came home that afternoon, Pinky was helping her mother make some apple juice. As
they cut the apples, what did Pinky say about some of the apples?
o What was her mother’s response to this?
o So people are also like apples…some may look not-so-nice from the outside but on the inside, they
may be……..? Some may look very nice on the outside but inside, they may be……..?
o So, based on this, what can we learn about judging people? (Can we know whether people are
good/ we can trust them just by looking at them/ from their appearance?)
o Later that afternoon, when Pinky and Chintu went to the park, who did they see? And what did
Chintu do?
o What did Pinky tell Chintu at the time?
o What people safety rules had Pinky learnt?
Pinky and Chintu were brother and sister. They lived with their mother and father in a nice
house which was near an apple orchard. Except for the fact that Pinky was a girl and Chintu
was a boy, and that each had hobbies of their own (Chintu loved to build and fly model
airplanes and Pinky liked to play with dolls), they enjoyed many of the same things too – bike
265
riding, football, hide and seek and just going to the park. There was one other important
difference between them:
Chintu was cautious and careful and a little weary of strangers. Pinky, on the other hand,
wasn’t the least bit weary. She was friendly to a fault. Just about everybody that came her way
got a big “Hello!” “Hello Butterfly!”
“Hello Frog!”
“Hello Mr. Truck driver!”
“Hello Mr. Postman!”
Chintu worried about Pinky’s free and easy way with strangers. Strangers weren’t the problem
for him. Not talking to strangers suited cautious and careful Chintu just fine. But friendly-to-a-
fault Pinky was different. She talked to everybody.
“Pinky, I’m glad you asked these questions” said Papa in his deepest and most serious voice.
“The reason you should never talk to a stranger and never ever take presents or sweets from a
stranger and Never Ever go anywhere with a stranger is that it’s dangerous ! “
“What’s dangerous about it?” she asked wide-eyed. “What can happen?”
“All sorts of things!” Papa said. “Here! Look at the newspaper.”
As she looked at it her eyes grew wider and wider. This is what she saw:
“I hope you’re paying attention to all this” called Papa to Chintu and Pinky.
Pinky had a hard time falling asleep that night. Her mind was filled with those headlines. The
next day dawned bright and friendly to everybody but Pinky. She had spent a restless night
and when she looked out the window everything seemed a little scary. The trees seemed
bigger and like their branches were going to reach out to catch her; the owls and crows
seemed to look at her in a frightening way.
“Let’s go out and ride our bikes” said Chintu after breakfast. But Pinky didn’t want to. Chintu
266
was puzzled. Their neighborhood was a busy and friendly place where she loved to play.
“Well, how about some football?” But she didn’t want to do that either. It wasn’t until he
suggested hide and seek, her favorite game that she agreed to go along.
Before they left, they told Mama where they would be – It was a family rule that they never
went anywhere without telling Mama or Papa.
“That’s fine” said Mama. “I’m on my way to pick some apples at the orchard. I’ll stop by for
you on the way home.”
Everything continued to look a little scary to Pinky…the neighbors, other people, the dogs,
even the frogs.
Later, when one someone tapped her on the shoulder, she jumped a mile - even though it was
just Mama.
“How was the morning?” asked Mama on the way home in the car.
“It was ok”, said Pinky “But there were so many strangers!”
Later at home when Mama and Pinky were getting ready to make apple juice, Mama said “You
know what Papa told you were quite right. It’s not a good idea to talk to strangers, accept
presents or rides from them.” “But” she continued. “That doesn’t mean that all strangers are
bad. Let me explain… it’s like this barrel of apples. There is an old saying that goes there’ll
always be a bad apple in every barrel. That’s the way it is with strangers. Children have to be
careful because of the few bad apples.” “Look!” said Pinky. “I found one! It’s all bumpy and has
a funny shape!”
“Well, it’s certainly strange looking, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s bad. You can’t
always tell from the outside which are the bad apples.”
She cut it in half. “See.” She said. “It’s fine inside.”
“Now, here’s one that looks fine on the outside…”
“… but inside it’s all wormy.”
“Ugh!” said Pinky.
“What’s up?” asked Chintu.
“A bad apple!” said Pinky.
“See, that’s what I mean,” said Mama. “It looked good from the outside but was bad on the
inside. People are also like that sometimes…some don’t look very nice on the outside but may
actually be good on the inside, so they are good people. Some look beautiful outside but may
not be very nice on the inside—that is, they are not to be trusted. Just like apples, it is hard to
tell what people are like on the inside by just looking at their outsides. And that’s why we
cannot tell with strangers—we don’t know who they are or what they are like inside.
“Hey, I’m going to the field outside to fly my new airplane. Want to come?” asked Chintu.
“Sure” said Pinky. She felt much better now… more like her old friendly self.
The airplane was a great success and the children were about to head home when someone
came to the field with a big beautiful orange and green model airplane.
“Wait!” said Chintu. “I want to watch! It’s an automatic remote control plane!”
Chintu ran up to the stranger and started talking to him! For that’s what he was-- a stranger --
no matter how big and beautiful his airplane was!
“I’m going to send it up and follow in the car,” the stranger was saying. “Want to come
along?”
267
“Wow!” said Chintu. And he would have – if Pinky hadn’t grabbed his arm and said “Don’t you
dare!” The stranger drove off following his airplane.
And Pinky ran home shouting, “Chintu talked to a Stranger! Chintu talked to a stranger!” “But
it was a big orange and green radio-controlled airplane!” said Chintu.
“That doesn’t matter”, said Papa. “We have rules about strangers – and they’re important!”
“We have rules about tattletales too” said Chintu, glaring at Pinky.
“Pinky wasn’t tattling. Tattling is telling just to be mean’ explained Mama. “And Pinky was
telling because she loves you and she was worried.”
“Do you think that fellow was like a bad apple?” asked Chintu.
“Probably not” said Mama.
“That’s right” said Pinky, “Most folks are friendly and nice and wouldn’t hurt a fly. But you have
to be careful, just in case.”
“Speaking of apples,” said Mama. “How about some of this apple juice I just made?”
As they drank Mama’s delicious apple sauce, Chintu and Pinky thought about what they had
learned that day. There was quite a lot to think about.
268
Method: Story-telling
Materials: Story about how known people can hurt us (See box)
Summarize:
o All known people are not bad—we do have family members and friends who are good and
trustworthy. However, some of them may not be.
o One way to identify whether they are good/ trustworthy is by judging what they tell us to do—is
what they are telling us to do good/ comfortable or not? i.e. will it be harmful to us or others? If it is
harmful or hurtful to us or others, what they are telling us to do is not good— and so we know that
they are not good people either. (Recall what Meena told Pinky to do— to take someone else’s
pencil box without their permission/ without them knowing it).
o The second way to identify whether they are good/ trustworthy is by understanding HOW they tell
us to do certain things—are they forcing us to do it? Are they threatening to hurt us/not love us/
not be our friend? Anyone who forces or threatens us cannot be telling us to do something good—
and so they are not likely to be good or trustworthy people. (Recall Meena’s threat to Pinky if she
did not keep the pencil box).
o The third way to identify whether they are good/trustworthy is by listening to see whether they
make us promises to give us something nice or something we like in return for doing as they ask
i.e. ‘if you do what I say, I will give you/buy you..’ which also means that ‘if you don’t do as I say I
will not give you/buy you..’ If people are good and trustworthy, they would give us or buy us
something nice because they love us-not because we do as they say.
Pinky had a special friend in school. She was called Meena. They were very good friends and sat next to
each other in class, did homework together and played all their favourite games together—like hide and
seek and hopscotch. One day, while they were in the school playground, they found a shiny red pencil
269
“I wonder whose pencil box it is...someone has forgotten it and left it here,” said Pinky.
“If it has been left here, it belongs to us now...we can take it,” said Meena.
Pinky was worried. “I don’t think so...it does not belong to us...we can’t just take what belongs to someone
else...and they will be sad without it, no?” she said.
“Don’t be silly,” said Meena. “You worry too much about everything. Just take the box and put it into your
bag...and we will see what we can do with it later. If you don’t take it, I will not be your friend anymore...if
you do what I say, you can ride my new bicycle.” And so, although Pinky did not want to keep the pencil
box, she was forced to do so by Meena. Pinky was scared that if she did not obey Meena, then Meena
would not be friends with her—and Pinky really wanted Meena to like her and be friends with her. That
afternoon, when they went back to class, Tinku was sitting at his desk and crying. When the teacher asked
why, he said that he had lost his new red pencil box—the one that his uncle just gifted him on his
birthday—and his mother was going to be very annoyed with his carelessness too.
“Don’t cry”, said teacher. “Let us look for it—we are sure to find it.” The teacher got everyone to search
their desks and the classroom. Pinky, who by then was very scared, took the pencil box out of her bag and
handed it to the teacher.
When teacher asked Pinky why she had taken Tinku’s box, Pinky tried to explain that she had not wanted
to, that Meena had forced her to...but when teacher asked Meena, she said “I don’t know anything about
the pencil box—I have never even seen it before. Pinky is lying.”
Pinky was very sad when she went home that day. “I can’t believe that Meena got me into trouble,” she
cried to her mother. “Meena is supposed to be my friend. Doesn’t she care about me? Why did she make
me do bad things and tell lies?”
“Most people whom we know, especially those who are our friends are good and trustworthy people. But
sometimes even people we have known for a long time, and think are our friends may not be good or
trustworthy—just like Meena turned out to be,” said her mother.
“Anyone who tells you to steal something or do anything that will hurt either you or someone else could
not possibly be telling you something good...and so you know that person is not good and trustworthy,”
answered her mother.
“And if someone tells me to do bad things, like Meena did, what should I do?” asked Pinky.
“You can just come and tell me or Appa first...or your teacher or some grown-up you can really trust. And
we will help you to deal with the bad person. Now, don’t cry any more...I am sure you have other friends
to play with whom you can trust—remember not all our friends are bad and untrustworthy. I will talk to
your teacher tomorrow to explain what happened with Meena, I am sure she will understand.”
270
“Ok Amma, I am glad you are there to help me,” said Pinky wiping her eyes.
“Of course I am...and I always will be,” said her mother.
Method: Story-telling
• Tell children: “There are some people we meet everyday—people who look after us, play with us and we
know very well. Like who all…? Now we are going to learn some more about being safe from people we
know…we are going to talk about what to do when people tell us secrets.
• Tell the story ‘To Tell or Not to Tell—showing the children pictures as you narrate.
• Discuss the following questions:
o Why did Pinky and Chintu’s parents have to go away?
o Who came to look after them in their parents’ absence?
o Did they like Vanitha aunty at first? Why?
o When they came home from school one day, what did they find Vanitha aunty wearing? And what
did she say about it?
o How did Vanitha aunty convince Pinky and Chintu to keep the pink sari a secret?
o What did Vanitha aunty do when Pinky and Chintu asked to help with washing up later?
o How did Pinky and Chintu feel that night?
o What did Vanitha aunty want Pinky and Chintu to keep secret from their parents? Why?
o What were all the ways she used to make them keep it a secret?
o Why did Pinky and Chintu hesitate to tell their parents all about Vanitha aunty’s visit?
o What was Amma’s response to their fears about telling Vanitha aunty’s secrets?
o What did Appa say about secrets?
o Vanitha aunty had tried to keep various things a secret like her wearing Pinky’s mother’s sari/ her
not feeding the children/ her making them wash clothes/ her ruining the furniture. In the end, Pinky
and Chintu’s parents had also kept their beach plans a secret. What was the difference between
Vanitha aunty’s secret and Pinky/Chintu’s parents’ secret? Which one was a good secret and which
one was not?
o What have we learnt about good and bad secrets?
Summarize:
o Secrets can be good and fun (like the beach plan Pinky and Chintu’s parents had).
o Secrets can also be bad and unsafe (like Vanitha aunty’s secrets about the saree, or hurting Pinky
and Chintu).
o When people want us to be part of good secrets, there is no problem—because we know that at
the end, we as well as others will be happy and no one will get hurt.
271
o When people want us to be part of bad secrets, there is a problem—because we know that at the
end, we as well as others might get hurt and be unhappy.
o When people threaten to hurt us if we refuse to keep the secret, we know surely that they are bad
people and we should not trust them (just like the thieves said they would hit Tommy with a stick if
he told their secret plans).
o When people say they will give us something nice, something we like, like sweets or toys to keep
‘bad’ secrets, we know then also that they are bad people (just like Vanitha aunty gave Pinky and
Chintu chocolate ice-cream to keep her ‘bad’ secret).
o So, if someone tells us a ‘bad’ secret, it is important to tell someone we trust (just like Pinky and
Chintu told their parents). If we do not tell ‘bad’ secrets, then we ourselves or others may get hurt
or not be safe (as happened to Pinky and Chintu when they did not tell Vanitha aunty’s secrets to
their parents sooner/ on the phone).
Pinky and Chintu were playing in the garden when their mother called them to say that she
had just had some bad news. Their ajji, who lived in the next town, was very ill and so she and
their father had to go away for a few days to take care of her. “But don’t worry, you will not be
alone at home—I have made arrangements for Vanitha aunty to stay with you and take care
of you while I am gone.”
Vanitha aunty was an old family friend of their mother’s and the children had met her only
once—so they did not know her too well although their parents had been friends with her for
a long time. She arrived the day before Pinky and Chintu’s parents left town so that she could
get settled in and learn how everything in the house worked. She was a tall lady and Pinky was
a little afraid of her tall bun and thick black glasses. But she greeted the children warmly: “So,
no problem with your parents being away...I am here and we are going to have a whole of fun
together,” she said. Pinky and Chintu certainly hoped so.
At first, Vanitha aunty seemed nice. She made the children their favourite foods for dinner and
played board games with them when they got home from school. But slowly, the children did
not feel so sure about her. They returned from school one day to find her wearing their
mother’s saree. “Oh Amma’s favourite pink saree,” said Pinky, very surprised. “She usually does
not let anyone touch it as she doesn’t want it spoilt...how come she let you wear it?”
“O she need not know I wore it,” said Vanitha aunty, laughing, and wiping off some sambhar
that had dripped onto the delicate sari. “What she does not know, will not hurt her.” Pinky and
Chintu were puzzled— borrow Amma’s favourite sari? Drop food on it and ruin it? Not tell
Amma about it?
“And just so you keep our little secret, I have bought you some chocolate ice-cream...which
your mother said not to give you in cold weather because you might get a sore throat...but it’s
ok yaar...you eat some ice-cream and I won’t tell Amma that you ate it...just like you won’t tell
her that I wore her pink saree,” said Vanitha aunty, winking.
272
After eating their ice-cream, the children wanted to go outside to play. “No, no, I want you to
wash up everything in the kitchen, not go out and play now,” said Vanitha aunty. “After all, I
have worked hard to make you dinner.”
When Pinky and Chintu pleaded to help with washing up later in the evening, after play time,
she got angry and slapped them hard. “Bad children,” she said, “you need to learn to obey
your elders properly—and just so you remember to do so next time, you are not getting any
dinner tonight,” she shouted. “And don’t you dare tell your parents about any of this—if you
do, I will tell them about the ice-cream and they will know how disobedient you have been.”
Pinky and Chintu were too afraid to argue. So, they silently washed up in the kitchen and went
to bed without any dinner.
“Me too,” said Chintu. “Amma has been angry with us sometimes but she has never denied us
our food. I am going to tell her what Vanitha aunty did.”
“But Vanitha aunty is a really good friend of Amma’s—they have known each other for so
long...do you think Amma will believe us? And what about us eating the chocolate ice-cream?
Won’t Amma get angry if she knows that we ate some in this weather?”
“Perhaps...I don’t know,” said Chintu. Sad and confused, they fell asleep.
And so, the week went by, with Vanitha aunty often getting angry and making Pinky and
Chintu do things that were difficult and unnecessary—like forcing them to wash her clothes,
refusing to feed them if they did not clean up the kitchen, stay home with her instead of
playing outside. Sometimes she was angry and threatening and other times she was sugar-
sweet and promised to buy them treats (like clothes and toys) if they obeyed her. The latter,
they noticed, was mostly when she had ruined Appa’s furniture or stained
Amma’s new carpet-- and she told them to keep these things secret from their parents.
Pinky and Chintu were delighted when finally their parents came home and Vanitha aunty left.
“So, I hear that you were very good children,” said their father.
“Yes, Vanitha aunty said she loved being with you...so much so that in case Ajji falls ill again,
she said she would be happy to come back and look after you,” said Amma.
Pinky and Chintu were silent, unsure of whether to tell Amma and Appa about Vanitha aunty
and her secrets. But when they said nothing, Amma and Appa noticed that they looked afraid,
and Amma said, “Is there something you want to tell me? Why do you look so scared?”
And then, Pinky and Chintu could not keep the secrets any more—they told their parents
everything...about Amma’s pink saree and the chocolate ice-cream, Vanitha aunty slapping
them and not giving them dinner, her spoiling the furniture and her threats...her promises to
buy them treats for keeping her secrets.
273
“Why did you not tell us all this when we called everyday to check how you were doing?”
asked Appa.
“Because we were scared you would be angry about us eating the chocolate ice-cream...and
we were scared Vanitha aunty would be angry if we told you,” said Pinky.
“And we thought you might not believe us since Amma and Vanitha aunty are such good
friends,” said Chintu.
“We would always believe you, no matter what, so you can tell us anything you like—
especially if someone hurts you or does cruel things,” said Amma. “We are so glad you told us
now...I will deal with Vanitha aunty.”
“We thought that Vanitha aunty was a good person, especially since we have known her so
long...but we were wrong...we did not know,” said Appa. “Anyone who tells you to do bad,
dishonest things like Vanitha aunty did is a bad person...only a bad person would ask you to
keep secrets about bad things done...and either threaten you if you don’t keep the secret or
bribe you with sweets and toys.”
Chintu and Pinky, who had always thought that secrets were good and fun things now
understood that bad and untrustworthy people can sometimes make you keep secrets that
are bad—because they are hurtful to us or to others.
The next day, Amma said: “Hey Chintu and Pinky...Appa and I have a surprise for you...pack
your bags, we are going to the beach for the week end!”
Pinky and Chintu shouted with joy...they loved the beach! “Wow, how come you didn’t tell us
that before?” asked Pinky, her eyes shining with excitement.
“Because it was a secret...Appa and I wanted to surprise you and reward you for being so good
while we were away to take care of Ajji,” said Amma smiling.
Method: Game
Material: Chalk, list of safe/ unsafe situation statements (see box below)
• Your grandfather pats you on the back when you do well in school.
• Your uncle asks you to sit on his lap.
• Your cousin brother takes his trousers off in front of you.
• Your brother takes you out shopping to buy you clothes for your birthday.
• The doctor puts ointment on your thigh when you get hurt.
• Your father sleeps next to you and touches your body all over, saying that he loves you/
that you are his special child.
• The PT master picks you up and carries you to the sick room when you hurt yourself
during games.
• The next-door aunty asks you to touch various body parts of her and says she will give
you a chocolate for doing so.
• The priest (in temple/ church/ mosque) puts his hand on your head to give you his
blessings.
• Your father’s friend touches you in your private parts and tells you that if you tell
anyone, he will hurt or kill your family.
• Your father’s friend touches you in your private parts and tells you that no one is more
special than you/ that he loves you.
• An unknown man flicks the insect off your bag while you are riding the bus.
• Your elder brother says he likes to watch you having a bath.
275
Process:
• Tell the children: “We have seen the video about Komal and saw how despite our best efforts, sometimes
we may still be in unsafe situations. You also saw how when Komal felt uncomfortable and unsafe, she told
her mother…so we learnt that we need to tell someone. Why is it important to tell someone? [Re-cap how
if we do not tell, the difficulties and hurt will continue, and will not stop]. I hope that something like what
happened to Komal will not happen to you—and especially as now you have learnt to keep yourselves
safe, I believe you will be. But in the event something like that does happen to you, it would be good to be
prepared and just plan who you would tell. So let us plan who each of you would tell…and understand why
you are selecting this person.”
• Ask the children to close their eyes and think of one person they would go to and tell about difficulties, if a
situation of hurt and lack of safety were to occur.
• When they have thought and are ready, ask each child to quickly name the person they would approach
(example mother, sister, father, teacher…)
• Ask them to now draw a picture of a person they thought of.
• Discuss the following questions:
o Why would you tell this person?
o What special powers or qualities does this person have to help you?
• Summarize:
o It is good to have thought of someone just in case something happens—you will easily be able to
tell your troubles to this person and so you can get help more quickly than you would otherwise if
you were not sure who to tell.
o People we tell are usually people we trust very much—we trust them to listen to us, to believe us
and then to do something about it (whether to get help from others or from the police).
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/i-life-skills-gender-sexuality-relationships/
Process:
• Introduction: “In the last few sessions we discussed about our body, its functions, and also how we protect it.
This session we will be talking about what our life needs are in order to maintain good health.
• Ask children to list all the various needs that need to be met for our daily functioning and for our bodies to
work well/ for us to be healthy.
276
• Allow for children to express needs that relate to physical needs such as food/shelter/clothing…as well as
social and psychological needs, such as family, relationships etc.
• Next, ask children to categorize the items on this list into two: i) Basic Needs- those that sustain life; ii) Other
essential needs. Tell children that they need to be able to explain this categorization/ how they made the
decision about each item.
Discussion:
• What are the ways in which we can get these (listed) needs?
• How do we feel when these needs are met? (Joy/ pleasure…)
• If children do not mention it, ask about where sexual desire/ need for romantic relationships and physical
intimacy may be placed.
• When needs are met, at some point there may also be negative effects felt. When does this happen? What
might be some negative effects? *
• Validate needs and pleasures…discuss the amount consumed/ time spent…introduce concepts of balanced
approach and time management.*
*Apply these last two discussions to need for romantic relationships and physical intimacy— while the need is
perfectly legitimate, at what point might there be negative effects (for example, if we spend all our time thinking
only about our romantic relationship, ignoring other things we have to do in life…or make decisions focussing only
on these needs without considering other life issues…)
Process:
• Introduce the 5 sensory organs—eyes, ears, nose, mouth, skin. Explain how we feel or experience the
environment around us through these five organs—namely through sight, sound, smell, taste, touch.
• Taking each sensory organ or sense, ask participants to list various experiences we can have through it. For
instance, ‘what are all the things we can do with our eyes? What experiences can we have using the sense of
sight/ vision?’ Remember that these experiences may be pleasant or unpleasant’. (Similarly, ‘what are all the
things we can do with our ears? What pleasant/ unpleasant experiences can we have using the sense of
hearing? ‘What are all the things we can do with our skin? What pleasant/ unpleasant experiences can we have
using the sense of touch?’
• List the experiences (on paper or white board) as the participants speak. Either during or after the listing
categorize the experiences into pleasant or unpleasant experiences—also described as pleasurable or painful
experiences.
• At the end of the listing (and if the participants have not already done so), introduce the concept of sexual
pleasure: ‘As we discussed, we get pleasure sensations from experiences of various kinds of physical touch.
Sexual touch is one type of physical touch from which we get pleasure—that is if we are touched in certain
ways, in certain places in the body by a boy or girl that we like or feel attracted to. Just like when we eat good
food, we feel happy because of yummy taste…or when we hear good music, we feel soothed or happy, sexual
touch by certain people we like or desire can make us feel good.’
• Return to the body map drawn and explain: ‘Sexual pleasure, like other pleasure sensations and experiences
also has a physical basis. Let me show you where and how…’
277
• For girls’ groups, draw into the body map (where the vagina is/ at the top of the vaginal opening, roughly) a
leaf-like structure, as the clitoris and explain: ‘There is a tiny and very sensitive organ just above the vaginal
opening. It is called the ‘clitoris’ (in English). This tiny little body part is how and where girls feel sexual
pleasure…when it is touched directly or if other parts of her body receive sexual touch—then also this part
helps her to feel pleasure.’
• For boys’ groups, point to the penis on the body map and explain: when touched directly or if a boy receives
sexual touch in parts of his body, the sexual pleasure is felt primarily here, in the penis.’
278
Discussion:
Discussion:
• What do you see here?
• What does the boy say to the girl; what does he ask her (What does he want)?
• What was her reaction? Was she allowed to refuse? Why do you think she refused?
• How did he react to her refusal? What is your opinion of his reaction?
279
• Why do you think he reacted that way? What were his feelings?
• After she said ‘no’ what else could he have done instead of threatening her?
• How do we make decisions about getting into physical relationships?
• What have we learnt about consent and permission in sexual relationships?
• Perpetrator- While asking somebody if they are interested in physical relationship. What are some issues we
need to consider? (before asking them)
• Later, ask the children to divide into groups of 4-5 and ask them to role play a similar situation and tell them
that they need to show how they would respond to the same situation.
Process:
Discussion:
• What is happening in this clip?
• What is the relationship between these three people?
• What are they discussing about? What is your opinion about such discussions? (is it normal/does it happen…)
• One person/boy is not participating in the conversation. What do the others think of him? What is your
opinion about lack of sexual experience in someone? Is it necessary..?
• “If you’re a man, you should try… if you don’t try then you are a disgrace to the ‘male’ community….” Do you
agree with this statement? – Why/Why not?
• “If you haven’t seen anything yet, then when are you going to do”… What do you think of this?
• What do you think was the reason for his hesitation? Was he interested?
• Who do you think passed by and how old might this person have been?
• What do you think he had in mind for this child?
• Can we engage in sexual acts with children (let’s say below 13 years of age)? Why/Why not?
• Does this mean that we can engage in sexual acts with those who are 13yrs and above? Why/Why not?
OR
• Under what circumstances could you even consider engaging in a sexual act? (On issues of consent /
protection / using condom/ Risk of pregnancy and STD)
• What does the law say about engaging in sexual acts with children? (Provide information about POSCO)
• How could he have responded to these friends who believed that engaging in sexual act is important and
shows that you are a “real man”? What, according to you, are the qualities of a ‘real man’? (Facilitator to
discuss qualities that are human—to do with compassion, equality, sensitivity…)
280
Process:
Discussion:
• What do you see here?
• What type of relationship did they have?
• Where does he suggest taking their relationship?
• Is it ok for 2 people who know each other for long time( friends/lovers) to want to take the relationship to the
next level/
• What level of physical intimacy was she comfortable with? Is it different from what he wants/is suggestion,
how so?
Scene1:
• Is (i) Experimentation (ii) Knowing someone for long time; is this enough to engage in physical/sexual
relationship?
• What is she feeling w hile he was trying to persuade her?
• When she absolutely refuses to get into a physical relationship what does he say initially? Why does he say
this? What are his feelings?
Scene 2:
• What reasons does she give for not wanting to engage in physical intimacy, are they valid?
• What is his response to her refusal this time?
• What is the difference between his response in scene 1 and 2, which do you think is better response and why?
Process:
• Introduction to session: We are going to talk about safety issues, especially pertaining to personal safety and
abuse. This is the next criteria in making decisions about love and sexuality issues.
• Explain to the group: “Everybody deserves to feel safe and protected. Trusting a person means knowing or
believing that this person will not hurt you in any way or do anything that makes you feel confused or
uncomfortable. Children who have been hurt by someone have had their trust broken. It can be hard to trust
others again when you have been hurt or been unsafe and unprotected. Sometimes you may not even trust
yourself—and you may even believe that it was your fault that you were hurt. But you need to know that what
happened was NOT YOUR FAULT!”
• Give them sheets of white paper and pens/ colours.
• First, ask them to draw a picture of a person they can trust.
281
Note: Children who feel reluctant to share need not do so. Let them know that there is no pressure to do so and
that it is fine if they are able to participate and think through some issues and learn about them along with others.
(They may also choose to talk to you/ facilitator later on if they wish to share anything in particular).
282
Process:
• Screen the film clip.
Discussion:
• What do you see here?
• Did Shiva know his new neighbour? How did the N. uncle gradually get to know Shiva?
• If the first conversation that they had (playing with friends, watching Jungle Book), there was something that
the uncle said (a particular sentence) that should have warned Shiva that this uncle may not be a good person.
What was that?
• Why is this a problem if someone says “don’t tell your parents”?
• What is the difference between the kind of secrecy that is expressed here vs. the secrecy regarding a surprise
birthday party/Gift for someone?
• What kind of pictures do you think the uncle is showing Shiva?
• What do you think of the statement – If you see all these things you grow up…. Does anyone at home/at
school teach you stuff like this…?
• Is Knowledge/Experience of sex the only way to be grown up? Are there other ways of growing up such as …?
• Did uncle force Shiva to come home and see these pictures and taking photos at any point of time? So, does
this mean Shiva is a bad guy? Who is the bad guy here?
• When Shiva said it’s bad, what did the uncle suggest? What is your opinion? Why/Why not?
• At what point did Shiva feel uncomfortable and why?
• Do you think that he felt uncomfortable only when his uncle touched him Or even before?
• One danger sign is “Do not tell anybody. This is our secret!!”
• What is another sign to recognize danger?
(Hint: It is to do with how we feel) – Ans: Discomfort/confusion
• When Shiva says he wants to go home, what does his uncle threaten to do?
• What should Shiva do now? How should he respond?
Process:
• Introduction to session: “Today we will discuss relationships. There are many different types of relationships—
those within families and those in social spaces. Relationships have feelings and experiences within them.
There are also differences in levels of closeness…and relationships can be easy or difficult. We will now try to
understand different types of relationships and what respect and security mean within these relationships, how
to make decisions on which relationships we wish to engage in and how/ with whom”.
Discussion:
• What are the differences even within the family, between various relationships?
• Introduce the concept of rules and boundaries—that each relationship has certain boundaries/ people in it
have certain roles to play…if they fail to play these roles/ do them differently, there might be a problem/ a
violation.
• Ask children to give examples of when/ how these relationship boundaries get violated. In doing so, ask them
to go back to the concepts of safety and permissions…how would they use these now to understand
boundaries in relationships.
• In case the children do not provide examples of incest/ sexual abuse within the family, ask them about
whether/how relationship boundaries would be violated if fathers/ uncles/ male cousins engaged in sexual
relationships with children and adolescents (what parameters of relationships have been violated here?)
284
• To learn about a conceptual framework for balancing children rights to participation & decision-making
with the mandatory reporting law.
• To develop skills in mandatory reporting through adoption of practice guidelines with children (and
families).
Time
3.5 Hours
Concept
Mandatory reporting is a vital component of the law against child sexual abuse in India. Section 19 of the POCSO
Act, 2012 (hereafter referred to as ‘the Act’) states:
“Section 19. Reporting of offences.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974) any person
(including the child), who has apprehension that an offence under this Act is likely to be committed or has
knowledge that such an offence has been committed, he shall provide such information to --
(a) the Special Juvenile Police Unit; or
(b) the local police.
(2) Every report given under sub-section (1) shall be--
(a) ascribed an entry number and recorded in writing;
(b) be read over to the informant;
(c) shall be entered in a book to be kept by the Police Unit.
(3) Where the report under sub-section (1) is given by a child, the same shall be recorded under
subsection (2) in a simple language so that the child understands contents being recorded.
(4) In case contents are being recorded in the language not understood by the child or wherever it is
deemed necessary, a translator or an interpreter, having such qualifications, experience and on payment of
such fees as may be prescribed, shall be provided to the child if he fails to understand the same.
(5) Where the Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police is satisfied that the child against whom an offence
has been committed is in need of care and protection, then, it shall, after recording the reasons in writing,
make immediate arrangement to give him such care and protection including admitting the child into
shelter home or to the nearest hospital within twenty-four hours of the report, as may be prescribed.
285
(6) The Special Juvenile Police Unit or local police shall, without unnecessary delay but within a period of
twenty-four hours, report the matter to the Child Welfare Committee and the Special Court or where no
Special Court has been designated, to the Court of Session, including need of the child for care and
protection and steps taken in this regard.
(7) No person shall incur any liability, whether civil or criminal, for giving the information in good faith for
the purpose of sub-section (1).”
While section 19 of the Act creates an obligation to report for individuals, section 20 of the Act, creates such
an obligation for certain institutions. Section 20 states:
“Section 20. Obligation of media, studio and photographic facilities to report cases.
Any personnel of the media or hotel or lodge or hospital or club or studio or photographic facilities, by
whatever name called, irrespective of the number of persons employed therein, shall, on coming across
any material or object which is sexually exploitative of the child (including pornographic, sexually-related
or making obscene representation of a child or children) through the use of any medium, shall provide
such information to the Special Juvenile Police Unit, or to the local police, as the case may be.”
Section 21 of the Act prescribes punishment for the failure to report. It states:
“Section 21: Punishment for the failure to report a case.
(1) Any person, who fails to report the commission of an offence under sub-section (1) of section 19 or
section 20 or who fails to record such offence under sub-section (2) of section 19 shall be punished with
imprisonment of either description which may extend to six months or with fine or with both.
(2) Any person, being in-charge of any company or an institution (by whatever name called) who fails to
report the commission of an offence under sub-section (1) of section 19 in respect of a subordinate under
his control, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year and with fine.
(3) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to a child under this Act.”
By the use of the operative word shall in section 19(1), and section 20, the POCSO Act casts an obligation upon
every adult in the country and certain institutions respectively, who knows or suspects that a child is being sexually
abused to report the case to the authorities. To report a case, one must provide the information they know about
the incident of child sexual abuse to the Special Juvenile Police Unit (SPJU), or to the local police, which sets in
motion the chain of the criminal justice process. Knowledge in section 19(1) has been interpreted by the Supreme
Court to mean some information received by such a person gives him/her knowledge about the commission of
the crime. There is no obligation on this person to investigate and gather knowledge. Thus, there is no
requirement for this person to deduct from circumstances that an offence has been committed. Failure to report is
a punishable offence, as stated in section 21(1) of the Act, with imprisonment of up to six months, or a fine, or
both. In instances when the person is in charge of a company or institution (such as a School Principal, the
Superintendent of a Child care institution, etc) fails to report a crime of child sexual abuse which their subordinate
committed, the punishment is imprisonment of one year and a fine, as stated in section 21(2).
Referred to as “Mandatory Reporting”, this obligation to report is crucial – the legal process and the punishment is
dependent upon crimes being reported. It is intended to protect the child, protect their best interests, and to
safeguard other children who may potentially face abuse from the perpetrator. Further, it can also serve to act as a
deterrent to potential abusers and rightfully seeks to make perpetrators accountable for their crimes.
As beneficial as the legislation is, mandatory reporting brings along with it a number of challenges.
In the light of these difficulties, how best can mental health professionals, child protection workers and other child
service providers help children and families to work through their many concerns in order to ensure, as far as
286
possible, adherence to the mandatory reporting provisions of the POCSO Act? This module discusses the
challenges and provides frameworks and methodologies for working with children (and families) on mandatory
reporting issues in the context of CSA.
Mandatory reporting is the most crucial aspect of implementing the CSA law because the legal response to a
sexual offense, i.e., the investigation, framing of charges, trial, sentencing of the offender and prevention of further
abuse, relies almost entirely on this provision being triggered in the first place. The law seems to imply that
irrespective of what child victims’ opinion on the matter is, the incident(s) must be reported. But what if a child (or
her family) do not wish to report? What are barriers to reporting?
Barriers to reporting refer to issues similar to what we learnt in disclosure of CSA. They pertain to a range of
reasons in children, such as fears of not being believed, of being blamed (‘it was your fault’) and of the police and
law enforcement agencies, that the perpetrator may harm them or their families for reporting, that ‘everyone/ all
my friends will know what happened to me’…and family-related fears may similarly include social stigma, fears of
the perpetrator, the discomfort of reporting on the perpetrator if he/she is a family member, reluctance to engage
with the relatively unknown or unchartered territories of legal processes. Therefore, supposing we were to
implement the law as is, without consulting and communicating with children and families i.e. without
understanding and addressing their fears and anxieties regarding reporting, what might happen? We, as citizens
and/or child care professionals may have done our duty as per the law and reported the incident. But if the child
(and family) were reluctant to report in the first place, they are unlikely to follow through with the legal processes
thereafter…in other words, when the police contact them for the filing of the FIR and the recording of the 161
statements, the child (or family) may refuse to cooperate, in which the case is unlikely to move forward.
While even the Supreme Court has routinely acknowledged the aforementioned barriers to reporting, it has
tended to hold the view that the best interests of the child (a legally recognised principle of child rights) can only
be ensured if despite these barriers, reporting is ensured through the provision of mandatory reporting, due to the
threat of continued perpetuation of CSA against the child. Thus, in order to ensure the best interest of the child, it
is important to adopt a framework which balances the legal obligation to report with the child’s fears and
apprehensions about initiating and participating in legal proceedings.
287
Method:
Listing and discussion
Materials:
None
- Provide the following scenario: A child discloses CSA to you…and begs you not to report. She/he says… ‘please
don’t report! I don’t want anyone to know…if my parents get to know this, they will blame me…I don’t want bad
things to happen to my family…’
- Take a range of responses on: “What would you do? i.e. would you report or not? And what basis would you make
this decision on?”
-Go around the room and ask each participant to state one barrier to mandatory reporting…it could be child or
family-related, or it might be socio-cultural or systems related…
-Categorize the barriers accordingly…add any other categories that may emerge.
Listing and Categorization of Barriers…
Child & Family Related including socio-cultural Systemic (from mental health service providers’
perspective)
Fear of future…marriage/relationship Lack of specificity of law
When perpetrator is a family member Lack of understanding of methods to proceed with
Fear of breaking the family reporting
Lack of awareness of law and uncertainties of legal processes Confusions about roles & responsibilities
Child being re-traumatized…adverse mental health impacts Mental health professionals’ lack of knowledge on CSA
on child law
When child is groomed (will not report) Family pressuring professionals not to report
Child does not want to disclose/ report Fear of losing a client
Child’s fear of being blamed Fear of one’s own safety
Threats from perpetrator Reluctance to report—to get involved in tedious court
Child’s fear of losing physical mobility/ education processes
Status of family…more marginalized community groups less Lack of time (mental health professionals)—to get
likely to report into legal processes
Social stigma (Family) Difficulty in balancing child protection system
Family’s fear of loss of income, social exclusion agenda and family’s needs
Age and disability…young/disabled children have difficulty Inconsistencies in narratives provided by child and
reporting family (MH professional reluctant to report)
Position of (powerful) perpetrator in community Inadequate assessment and inquiry (we often do not
Normalization of abuse /violence…fatalism know or have adequate information to report)
Religion, personal beliefs of child/ family…of forgiveness
Institutionalized children…afraid of reporting (nowhere to
to)
288
A Framework for Balancing the Mandatory Reporting Law with Children’s Rights to Participation
& Decision-making
The implications of the (above-discussed) barriers to CSA disclosure and reporting are that while the law is
important, its effective implementation needs to take into consideration the rights of children (and families), to
make decisions and provide consent on reporting issues. Without the consent of children (and the assent of
parents/families), in the mandatory reporting process, further legal processes are unlikely to proceed smoothly i.e.
children and families may simply turn hostile, causing the case will fall through.
In essence, what we are dealing with is the tensions between the law and child rights, participation, and consent—
as represented in figure 1 below. The ‘see-saw’ comprises of legal and systemic perspectives on the one side, and
children’s perspectives on the other. Effective implementation of mandatory reporting would require the
integration of these two perspectives—each of which comprise of the elements subsequently discussed in Table A
below.
Figure 1: A Framework for Balancing the Mandatory Reporting Law with Children’s Rights to Participation
& Decision-making
Mandatory
Reporting in
CSA
289
Table A: Elements of Framework for Balancing the Mandatory Reporting Law with Children’s
Rights to Participation & Decision-making
Legal & Ethical Basis for Mandatory Reporting Barriers to Disclosure & Reporting in Children
• Every society has an obligation to protect its • Patriarchal attitudes, gender stereotypes and
citizens, especially the most vulnerable. consequent stigmatization,
• The need to break the silence about sexual crimes • Fear of not being believed or rejected
against children. • Upsetting the parents/caregivers,
• Imperatives for early detection of abuse, • Disruption of the family dynamics
prevention of child abuse, ensuring appropriate • Having a close relationship with the perpetrator.
institutional responses.
Challenges Posed by the POCSO Act for Mandatory Children’s Rights to Participation & Decision-making
Reporting • UN Child Rights Convention (CRC) states: children’s
• Lack of awareness of the law amongst child service ‘empowerment and participation should be central to
providers. child caregiving and protection strategies and
• Lack of adequate training of the stakeholders (i.e., programmes’.
police, prosecutors, judges, doctors, mental health • UNCRC defines child participation as: ‘ongoing
professionals). processes, which include information-sharing and
• No specification of categories of persons or dialogue between children and adults…in which
professionals who should report, or provisions for children can learn how their views and those of adults
protection for them. are taken into account and shape the outcome of such
processes.’
• Child’s right to protection cannot be implemented in
isolation from other rights.
Dilemmas and Concerns for Child Mental Health Developmental and Mental Health Considerations in
and Protection Service Providers Children’s Consent
• Lack of knowledge and recognition of child abuse. • Children’s abilities to provide consent are dependent
• Concerns about the negative effect of the on their age and developmental abilities as well as
reporting on the child’s family. their mental health status (in terms of trauma and
• Lack of training for professionals working with other psychiatric disorders)—for these factors impact
children on how to appropriately respond to or their capacities to engage in participatory processes
deal with disclosure of sexual trauma. relating to consent, in the context of mandatory
• Adverse effect on therapeutic alliance between the reporting.
therapist thus disrupting the child’s healing
process.
290
In the light of the tensions and the complexities of the mandatory reporting context in India the questions we
need to consider are:
• How do we navigate the dilemmas and challenges for reporting from the perspectives of service
providers and child protection and mental health systems, by considering: a) the requirements of
the POCSO law, and b) child rights and consent in the process of mandatory reporting?
• How to implement the mandatory reporting clause of the law by balancing the law with child rights
and consent—or in other words, how to negotiate with children (and families) in ways the enable
them to move towards the law and participate in reporting processes?
• In sum, how do we balance the law with child rights, participation and consent in the context of
mandatory reporting.
Given that one of the key lacunae in the implementation of mandatory reporting processes by child mental health
and protection personnel pertains to a paucity of systematic guidelines or protocols on navigating the challenges
of mandatory reporting, this session focuses on methods and skills to work with children (and families) on
mandatory reporting issues. SAMVAD has, based on its experience in CSA work, developed an 8-step guidance on
engaging children in mandatory reporting.
291
Materials: Video clips developed by SAMVAD on mandatory reporting, available on YouTube at:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw-VTsYZ44c&list=PL6M-
G4mGr43pxE7VQ0Gs5_MA1br6BkDmy&pp=iAQB
(QR codes for these videos are also available at the end of this module--refer to ‘Additional Materials’).
Process:
• Play the clips one by one—there are six clips in all, to be played in order, as follows:
• What were some of the concerns and hesitancies you observed in the child?
• How did the therapist/ child worker respond to them?
• What were some of the things that struck you about the therapist/ child worker’s scripts and
responses?
• Emphasize that similar approaches can be used with parents and family members also, to enable
them to follow through with mandatory reporting processes.
291
292
292
293
One may follow all the necessary guidelines to engage children in the mandatory reporting, embedding the
requisite processes in children’s developmental abilities, mental health issues, child rights and participation, some
children might still refuse to acquiesce reporting. How then do we respond to children’s refusal to reporting? One
possibility is to conduct a risk assessment as outlined in the table below, and make reporting decisions
accordingly.
A child who lives with the perpetrator (within the same house or family), or wherein the perpetrator, for whatever
reason, has regular access to the child, would be at high risk as the abuse is likely to continue—in this situation,
service providers would need to override the child’s decisions and refusal, and proceed to report. However, if the
perpetrator is no longer present in the child’s life, and/or the abuse was a one-off incident either by a person
relatively unknown to the child or by one who does not have easy or regular access to the child, the service
provider may comply with the child’s wishes and not proceed immediately with mandatory reporting.
293
294
Finally, it is critical for service providers to document every discussion that is had with the child (and family) on
mandatory reporting—so that there is always evidence that attempts have been made to follow the mandatory
reporting clause of the law. In case of any questions raised by child protection and legal authorities at a later
stage, appropriate documentation may serve to protect service providers as the authorities are made aware of due
attempts at mandatory reporting. This documentation (preferably in the child’s file) must include the following:
• Information that was provided to the child/ family regarding the law.
• Reasons and reservations expressed by the child (and family) for not reporting.
• Attempts made by the service providers to persuade the child (and family) to report (Thus, having a
protocol or guideline for discussion of mandatory reporting processes with children and families also
enables service providers to engage methodically in discussion processes and consequently, and allow for
systematic documentation).
• Outcomes of discussions and negotiations, at each stage i.e. child and family responses.
Method:
Role play
Material:
A hand-out with the 8-step mandatory reporting guideline (developed by SAMVAD);
Additional Materials (2) on frequently asked questions in mandatory reporting—for use by the
facilitator but may, at the end of the session also be shared with the participants.
Process:
• Ask participants to divide into pairs—wherein one person assumes the role of the child, and
the other, that of a counsellor.
• Provide each pair with a hand-out with the 7-step mandatory reporting guideline.
• Request them to use the guideline, particularly the script, to try out some ways of engaging a
child in the mandatory reporting process.
• If time permits, ask one to two participant pairs to to volunteer to do the role play in plenary.
Discussion:
• Request participants to share their experiences—particularly parts of the discussion that may
have been challenging (i.e. where they struggled to respond to children).
• Explain that the steps and scripts presented in the guideline are approaches and ideas to
make the interactions and discussions on mandatory reporting more systematic—but that
participants/service providers may feel free to try out various analogies or methods that are
age-appropriate and enable children to participate in the decision-making process.
294
295
How child mental health and protection service providers balance issues of law with child rights and participation,
child development and mental health, to make decisions on mandatory reporting ultimately depends on
quintessentially on their orientations to children and childhood and views on children’s rights; whether they
believe that children’s rights to safety and protection must always supersede their rights to participation and
decision-making; the circumstances under which compliance with rules and laws are absolute vis-à-vis situations
in which children may be provided space to be heard, and to participate in decisions that affect their lives. All
responses to mandatory reporting are a result of the permutations and combinations of such individual
knowledge and beliefs factors, in ever varying proportions. This might explain why one service provider’s position
might be to always report CSA, because children’s safety and protection interests must always be paramount (and
take precedence over child rights and resulting mental health issues); and another service provider’s position may
be to never report without the consent of the child, even if it means going to prison for six months, because
children’s rights and consent are paramount. These responses, at the two extreme ends of the spectrum of
responses, can neither be intensely condemned, nor strongly supported, because they are predicated on individual
belief systems and professional ideologies.
In order to straddle these varied personal and professional beliefs and ideologies, and the challenges of varying
contextual realities in which CSA plays out and mandatory reporting is required to be implemented, that the 8-
step guidance has been developed…in the hope of empowering service providers with a framework for systematic
engagement and response so that, no matter what the final outcomes are for mandatory reporting, appropriate
attempts were made, to push for the implementation of mandatory reporting, in ways that attempt to balance the
existing law with children’s rights to participation and decision-making.
295
296
Suggested Readings
▪ Ramaswamy, S., Devgun, M., Seshadri, S., & Bunders, J. (2023). Balancing the law with children’s rights to
participation and decision-making: Practice guidelines for mandatory reporting processes in child sexual
abuse. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 81, 103464.
▪ Mathews, B. (2015). Mandatory reporting laws: Their origin, nature, and development over time.
In Mandatory reporting laws and the identification of severe child abuse and neglect (pp. 3-25). Springer,
Dordrecht.
▪ Pietrantonio, A. M., Wright, E., Gibson, K. N., Alldred, T., Jacobson, D., & Niec, A. (2013). Mandatory
reporting of child abuse and neglect: Crafting a positive process for health professionals and
caregivers. Child abuse & neglect, 37(2-3), 102-109.
▪ McQuoid-Mason, D. (2011). Mandatory reporting of sexual abuse under the Sexual Offences Act and the
‘best interests of the child’. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 4(2), 74-78.
▪ Kuruppu, J., Forsdike, K., & Hegarty, K. (2018). 'It's a necessary evil': experiences and perceptions of
mandatory reporting of child abuse in Victorian general practice. Australian journal of general
practice, 47(10), 729-733.
▪ Hepworth, I., & McGOWAN, L. (2013). Do mental health professionals enquire about childhood sexual
abuse during routine mental health assessment in acute mental health settings? A substantive literature
review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 20(6), 473-483.
▪ Wekerle, C. (2013). Resilience in the context of child maltreatment: Connections to the practice of
mandatory reporting. Child abuse & neglect, 37(2-3), 93-101.
▪ Falkiner, M., Thomson, D., & Day, A. (2017). Teachers’ understanding and practice of mandatory reporting
of child maltreatment. Children Australia, 42(1), 38-48.
▪ Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. State of Maharashtra, (2013) 5 SCC 546.
▪ Sr. Tessy Jose and Others vs. State of Kerala, (2019) 3 SCC (Cri) 164.
▪ Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of UP and Ors. (2014) 2 SCC 1
296
297
Additional Materials
Videos for the Activity on ‘Communicating with Children on Mandatory Reporting Issues’
2.
297
298
Suggested Scripts for Implementing Practice Guidelines on Mandatory Reporting in Child Sexual Abuse for
the Activity ‘Let’s Try it Out!’
*Note: The use of the sample scripts (below) is at the discretion of practitioners—it is expected that based on their
knowledge of child development, they will modify the scripts and their language to fit the child’s age and
understanding.
“Let us first look at what happens if we decide to report…and make a list of the good things that could
happen for you/ your family if we report” [let child do it—and either the child or you can write down the list
as he/she speaks].
“Now let us make a list of the not-so-good things that you may feel might happen if we report… [let child do
it—and either the child or you can write down the list as he/she speaks].
299
300
300
301
Time
2 Hours
Concept
India has an adversarial system of justice, so the process of arriving at the truth is based on a judge-led
evaluation of two versions of the ‘truth’, to conclusively decide which version of events offers the best
approximation of truth. The adversarial model assumes that the parties' self-interest will ensure that all relevant
material is presented and tested before the court. However, the judge must make do with the evidence presented.
This means assuming a passive role in the selection and interviewing of witnesses. Even under India’s POCSO Act,
while the Judge is supposed to question/interview the child, the court cannot substantially change the substance
of questions posed by defence counsel during cross-examination. In practice, it is commonly accepted by lawyers
that the adversarial model is primarily designed to resolve disputes, rather than discover the ‘truth’.
301
302
“Courtrooms were designed for the large number of adults who become participants and spectators in trials. Their
furniture, lighting, acoustics, and uniformed personnel assure a serious and, in some ways, intimidating atmosphere.
The theory is that in such an environment, witnesses and jurors will be more likely to take their responsibilities
seriously. For children, however, the courtroom can do more than encourage civic responsibility - it can terrify and
silence.”
- Dziech, B.W., and Schudson, C.B. 1989. On Trial: America's Courts and Their Treatment of Sexually Abused
Children.
In the context of sexual abuse cases, one of the most debilitating aspects of judicial process is the atmosphere of
the courtroom. Children often experience fear and confusion in courtroom settings which impedes upon the
child’s ability to provide testimony. This has significant implications for the trial of the case in situations wherein
the child meets the criteria for a competent witness, but is unable to effectively recall information relevant to the
case on account of the daunting courtroom atmosphere. Research in this regard has underscored the importance
of the interview context in facilitating or debilitating witness.
The issue of secondary traumatisation lies at the heart of the debate on the impact of the adversarial system on
children in sexual abuse cases. Dealing with the court processes in child sexual abuse (CSA) cases can be complex
and distressing for children. The child’s account is often the only source of evidence, and therefore, the child’s lack
of understanding about legal processes may serve as a particularly distressing experience requiring mental health
interventions to assist children in testifying before courts. Additionally, given the age and the developmental stage
of the children, their vulnerabilities are further exacerbated. They may not have the ability to understand the
language of the courtroom. Due to their traumatic experience of child sexual abuse, it may also be difficult for
them to recall details of the abuse event. In the absence of adequate court preparation, cross examination in court
(a defining feature of the adversarial system), may only exacerbate the trauma of victims, thereby leading to their
secondary traumatization.
One of the key imperatives for enacting a law such as the POCSO Act, as reiterated in the landmark cases of State
of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh (1996) and Nipun Saxena v. Union of India (2018) (more recently) was expressly to
address the barriers to witness testimony in sexual assault cases, currently faced by the criminal justice system, due
to the acrimonious nature of case proceedings. Therefore, the point raised in the above quote has to be addressed
in CSA cases, if the basic imperatives of a procedurally just trial are to be upheld so as to ensure that POCSO
proceedings provide justice without the heavy price of secondary traumatisation.
Through much of the literature on child witnesses and victims in sexual abuse cases, research has affirmed that
children experience anxiety surrounding court appearances and that the main fear is facing the defendant.
Pursuant to extant research, other reported fears include being hurt by the defendant, embarrassment about
crying or not being able to answer questions, and going to jail. Consequently, the more frightened a child is, the
less they are able to answer questions. The key findings of some of the available research, on the greatest
predictors of inadequate responses, include young age and severity of abuse; postponements resulting in
emotional difficulties; and having to testify more than once being positively associated with long-term mental
health problems.
302
303
On the other hand, the use of shielding procedures, such as testifying via a 2-way video-monitoring system, is
reportedly less stressful for children than court appearances. Children providing shielded testimony were generally
reported to give more accurate and detailed information. In light of the Section 36 of the POCSO Act, and the
recent decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Smruti Tukaram Badade v. The State of Maharashtra and Anr
(with reference to the establishment of vulnerable witness deposition complexes across the country), this
relaxation in the adversarial nature of CSA proceedings serves as a fundamental feature in minimizing secondary
traumatization, and indeed, the possibility of the child witness turning hostile.
Research on child witnesses has also facilitated an experiment to investigate the effect which an environment had
on children’s ability to recall. Children were shown a videotape and the following day half the children were
interviewed in a courtroom and the other half in a private room. The results indicated that children, who were in
the private room, related more central/key details in free recall, answered specific questions more often, and said
“I don’t know’ or gave no answer significantly less often than the children questioned in the courtroom. A further
study to explore the effect of the courtroom environment on the quality of children’s evidence and the level of
stress they experienced indicated that certain characteristics of the courtroom interfere with the child’s ability to
give evidence in an optimal manner, and furthermore, increase stress. The children who were questioned in the
simulated courtroom provided less detailed descriptions of past events in free recall than children of the same age
who were interviewed at school.
No. It is not the act of testifying itself which exerts a negative impact on the quality of the child’s memory recall
with respect to the abuse incident. The important question relates to the environment in which children are
testifying. The majority of research indicates that testifying usually does not significantly harm or retraumatize
child victim-witnesses—particularly with the increasing use of alternative and less adversarial witness procedures
(such as two-way mirrors) and other special measures/relaxations designed to reduce the child's anxiety and
accommodate the child’s developmental needs.
While discussing the issues associated with the adversarial process in regard to child victims and witnesses, we are
essentially questioning the fairness of the process from a procedural justice standpoint. In other child contexts
(such as juvenile and custody-related jurisdictions), procedural justice may envisage the opportunity for the child’s
participation and representation in all proceedings affecting the rights and liabilities of the child. However, as is
typically the case with children in sexual abuse cases as well, the issue of procedural justice in a child hearing is
one that far exceeds the basic requirements of a fair trial i.e., right of participation and adequate representation.
If procedural justice can be broadly defined as the quality of decision-making/adjudicatory procedures, from a
child’s standpoint, one is essentially entering into a discussion of the common minimum standard of care that
must be afforded to all child stakeholders by virtue of their developmental and cognitive abilities. This discussion,
and by extension the discussion on the adversarial process is critical, since procedural justice theories dictate that
a child’s satisfaction with the process (‘process fairness’) is also significant in addition to satisfaction with the
outcome (‘outcome fairness’). Specifically, the child’s perceptions of the legitimacy of the criminal justice system
are tied, in essence, not just to the outcome of the case, but critically, to the child’s interactions with its
stakeholders. In this regard, the child’s interactions with the system have subsequent implications on any
evaluation of their capacity for full and effective participation in all case proceedings. Developmental research has
303
304
indeed established that young children are able to evaluate the fairness of activities and that they have a more
positive perception of activities they deem to be fairer.
Keeping in mind the above, there is considerable debate, in child sexual abuse literature, regarding the most
effective system for adjudication of child sexual abuse cases, wherein process fairness concerns can be adequately
addressed, along with those related to outcome fairness. In a sense, this struggle for balance relates to two broad
issues: a) the defendant’s right to effective representation (and, by extension, zealous advocacy); and b) the best
interest of the child. In a bid to balance the two, India’s POCSO Act, provides a series of exemptions and
relaxations (discussed below) to mitigate the issue of zealous advocacy, while still maintaining sufficient room for
effective representation of the defendant’s case. Keeping in mind the issues related to cross-examination of child
witnesses, there continues to be an ongoing conversation in child sexual abuse literature on the most feasible
ways of maintaining such a balance. Therefore, this chapter will explore the current overall situation and
possibilities for the future.
As a part of this study, sixty child respondents who provided testimony in court, were contrasted with a control
group of seventy-five children whose cases had not reached the trial stage. The key findings reported were that
the children who testified displayed more behavioural disturbances than children who did not take the stand,
seven months after their testimony. This was all the more evident when children were required to testify
repeatedly, did not have the benefit of maternal support, and whose statements were not corroborated with other
evidence.
However, most importantly, the adverse effects of testifying reduced significantly after the prosecution of the case
was over. In a follow-up study, which was conducted after a period of more than 12 months, following the
conclusion of the trial, it was reported that victim-witnesses, who had testified, viewed the legal system as fairer
than those children whose cases did not go to trial.
In light of the difficulties with the adversarial system, as outlined above, sections 33-38 of the POCSO Act stipulate
key provisions in relation to the child-friendly procedural requirements of a POCSO case before a Special Court.
They are as follows:
(1) A Special Court may take cognizance of any offence, without the accused being committed to it for trial, upon
receiving a complaint of facts which constitute such offence, or upon a police report of such facts.
(2) The Special Public Prosecutor, or as the case may be, the counsel appearing for the accused shall, while
recording the examination-in-chief, cross-examination or re-examination of the child, communicate the questions
to be put to the child to the Special Court which shall in turn put those questions to the child.
(3) The Special Court may, if it considers necessary, permit frequent breaks for the child during the trial.
(4) The Special Court shall create a child-friendly atmosphere by allowing a family member, a guardian, a friend or
a relative, in whom the child has trust or confidence, to be present in the court.
(5) The Special Court shall ensure that the child is not called repeatedly to testify in the court.
304
305
(6) The Special Court shall not permit aggressive questioning or character assassination of the child and ensure
that dignity of the child is maintained at all times during the trial.
(7) The Special Court shall ensure that the identity of the child is not disclosed at any time during the course of
investigation or trial:
Provided that for reasons to be recorded in writing, the Special Court may permit such disclosure, if in its opinion
such disclosure is in the interest of the child.
(8) In appropriate cases, the Special Court may, in addition to the punishment, direct payment of such
compensation as may be prescribed to the child for any physical or mental trauma caused to him or her for
immediate rehabilitation of such child.
35. Period for recording of evidence of child and disposal of case — (1) The evidence of the child shall be
recorded within a period of thirty days of the Special Court taking cognizance of the offence and reasons for
delay, if any, shall be recorded by the Special Court.
(2) The Special Court shall complete the trial, as far as possible, within a period of one year from the date of taking
cognizance of the offence.
36. Child not to see accused at the time of testifying — (1) The Special Court shall ensure that the child is not
exposed in any way to the accused at the time of recording of the evidence, while at the same time ensuring that
the accused is in a position to hear the statement of the child and communicate with his advocate.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), the Special Court may record the statement of a child through video
conferencing or by utilising single visibility mirrors or curtains or any other device.
37. Trials to be conducted in camera—The Special Court shall try cases in camera and in the presence of the
parents of the child or any other person in whom the child has trust or confidence:
Provided that where the Special Court is of the opinion that the child needs to be examined at a place other than
the court, it shall proceed to issue a commission in accordance with the provisions of Section 284 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974).
38. Assistance of an interpreter or expert while recording evidence of child —(1) wherever necessary, the
Court may take the assistance of a translator or interpreter having such qualifications, experience and on payment
of such fees as may be prescribed, while recording the evidence of the child.
(2) If a child has a mental or physical disability, the Special Court may take the assistance of a special educator or
any person familiar with the manner of communication of the child or an expert in that field, having such
qualifications, experience and on payment of such fees as may be prescribed to record the evidence of the child.’
In addition to the above, key procedural changes were also introduced to the Criminal Procedure Code and
Evidence Act from the perspective of securing child-friendly procedures. These include the following:
Sec 357C. Treatment of victims — ‘All hospitals, public or private, whether run by the Central Government, the
State Government, local bodies or any other person, shall immediately, provide the first-aid or medical treatment,
free of cost, to the victims of any offence covered under … the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), and shall
immediately inform the police of such incident.]’
305
306
Sec. 164 Recording of Confessions and Statements: (5A) ‘…the Judicial Magistrate shall record the statement of
the person against whom such offence has been committed in the manner prescribed in sub-section (5), as soon
as the commission of the offence is brought to the notice of the police:
Provided that if the person making the statement is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically disabled,
the Magistrate shall take the assistance of an interpreter or a special educator in recording the statement:
Provided further that if the person making the statement is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically
disabled, the statement made by the person, with the assistance of an interpreter or a special educator, shall be
video graphed.
(b) A statement recorded under clause (a) of a person, who is temporarily or permanently mentally or physically
disabled, shall be considered a statement in lieu of examination-in-chief, as specified in section 137 of the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872) such that the maker of the statement can be cross-examined on such statement,
without the need for recording the same at the time of trial.]’
Sec. 53A (Indian Evidence Act): Evidence of character or previous sexual experience not relevant in certain
cases –– ‘…where the question of consent is in issue, evidence of the character of the victim or of such person’s
previous sexual experience with any person shall not be relevant on the issue of such consent or the quality of
consent.’
So, what are the implications of these changes on the adversarial system?
In the case of Dr Atul Krishna v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors (2021), the Court noted that ‘the Trial Court, despite
having taken cognizance almost seven years back, has not moved in the matter even an inch thereafter, including
to frame charges, as may be necessary, despite 78 adjournments in the case.’
This case is one among many, wherein the Courts have taken serious note of long delays in the trial of sexual
offences, particularly those relating to children. However, owing to delays from the investigation stage itself, issues
continue to affect the timely adjudication of POCSO cases. What is also significant to note here, is that POCSO
cases are required to be completed within a 'reasonable' timeframe, in accordance with the stipulated period of a
year under the Act. This does not, however, comport with recent cases wherein the trial was completed in a day’s
time. The trial must still be completed in a manner that is in keeping with the basic requirements of a fair trial.
The adversarial system of cross examination is considered to be the efficient way of arriving at the truth and
ascertaining the credibility of a witness. However, there are numerous issues like court language and
miscommunication, emotional distress and trauma of the child, difficulties in recall and inconsistency. The
evidence of a child, therefore, cannot be subjected to an adult-level of scrutiny. Put differently, the criminal justice
system needs to adopt a child-inclusive definition of a ‘reasonable witness’ to ensure that adversarial proceedings
do not interfere with the child’s participation in relevant proceedings.
306
307
Discussion:
• Were there issues that you feel affect the quality of the child’s ability to recall events accurately?
• Can such a line of questioning be characterized as relating to the veracity of the allegations, or
would you describe the questions differently?
Changes brought to criminal law, post the Nirbhaya incident, disallow any kind of character evidence from being
considered in sexual offences cases, particularly those relating to the child’s sexual history. In this regard, in the
landmark case of Nipun Saxena v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court noted the following:
‘If the victim is strong enough to deal with the recriminations and insinuations made against her by the police, she
normally does not find much succour even in court. In Court the victim is subjected to a harsh cross-examination
wherein a lot of questions are raised about the victim’s morals and character. The Presiding Judges sometimes sit
like mute spectators and normally do not prevent the defence from asking such defamatory and unnecessary
questions.
307
308
Looking ahead to the future… Are there alternative models of justice for child victims/witnesses
of sexual abuse?
Typically, discussions on alternatives to the adversarial system tend to lay emphasis on the fundamentally distinct
features of the inquisitorial system (and its greater compatibility with child-related proceedings). Let’s take a look
at what inquisitorial systems (like those of France and Italy) do differently…
● In this procedure the judge investigates the case himself i.e., oversees police investigation in the case. The
accused is seen as the object of the inquiry and has no procedural right to ‘confrontation.’
● The confrontation here takes place between the accused and the court, rather than between two parties.
● The inquisitorial procedure “a quasi-scientific search for the truth rather than a dispute” through which the
Judge evaluates all available evidence to arrive at a decision or finding.
● Unlike the adversarial system, the Judge (in this model), is not limited by the evidentiary toolbox of the
opposing parties.
It is significant to note that while the inquisitorial system does have significant advantages in terms of providing a
framework for case proceedings that minimise the possibility of secondary traumatisation, there remain legal
concerns with a purely inquisitorial system. Specifically, some of these concerns relate to the possibility of bias,
owing to the reality of the system’s application, wherein presiding officers assume certain key functions of the
defence counsel. Chief amongst these concerns is, ironically, whether the Judge can conduct cross-examinations
with the same rigour as that of defence counsel. Many argue that the whole point of cross-examination is lost, if
the judge does not engage in sufficient court craft, which may prove to be intrinsic to eliciting the most truthful
account of events from the child witness. However, the assumption that the truth can only result from the
vexatious examination of vulnerable witnesses is, perhaps, overstated.
Indeed, as aforementioned article notes, the basic point of a cross-examination i.e., to evaluate the veracity of
allegations made in a case of CSA, is not necessarily tied to testing the child’s susceptibility to miscommunication
in the face of confounding and suggestive questioning. The foregoing discussion, in addition to various proposals
for incorporation of inquisitive techniques in adversarial proceedings, or ‘special measures’, to facilitate a more
child-friendly atmosphere, raise critical debates on what child-friendly proceedings could look like in the future.
More information on this subject is available in the recommended readings below.
308
309
Suggested Readings
▪ Müller, K. D., & Hollely, K. A. (2009). Introducing the Child Witness (2nd ed.). Printrite: Port Elizabeth.
▪ Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice.
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102, 119.
▪ Goodman, G. S., et al. (1992). Testifying in Criminal Court: Emotional Effects on Child Sexual Assault Victims.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. Vol. 57, No. 5.
▪ Quas, J. A., et al. (2005). Childhood Sexual Assault Victims: Long-Term Outcomes After Testifying in Criminal Court.
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 70, No. 2.
▪ Zajac, R., O’Neill, S., & Hayne, H. (2012). Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross-examination.
Developmental Review, 32(3), 181-204.
▪ Davies, G., & Westcott, H. (1995). The child witness in the courtroom: Empowerment or protection? In M. S. Zaragoza,
J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath (Eds.), Memory and testimony in the child witness (pp. 199–
213). Sage Publications, Inc.
▪ McKillop, N., Reynald, D. M., & Rayment-McHugh, S. (2021). (Re) Conceptualizing the role of guardianship in
preventing child sexual abuse in the home. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 23(1), 1-18.
▪ Firestone, G., & Weinstein, J. (2004). In the best interests of children: A proposal to transform the adversarial system.
Family Court Review, 42(2), 203-215.
▪ Freiberg, A. (2011). Post-adversarial and post-inquisitorial justice: Transcending traditional penological paradigms.
European Journal of Criminology, 8(1), 82-101.
▪ Hoyano, L. (2015). Reforming the adversarial trial for vulnerable witnesses and defendants. Criminal Law Review, 2,
107-129.
▪ King, M. T. (2001). Security, scale, form, and function: The search for truth and the exclusion of evidence in adversarial
and inquisitorial justice systems. International Legal Perspectives, 12, 185.
▪ Finkelstein, R. (2011). The adversarial system and the search for truth. Monash University Law Review, 37(1), 135-144.
▪ Burton, M., Evans, R., & Sanders, A. (2007). Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in
England and Wales. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 11(1), 1-23.
▪ Caprioli, S., & Crenshaw, D. A. (2017). The culture of silencing child victims of sexual abuse: Implications for child
witnesses in court. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57(2), 190-209.
▪ Jodi A. Quas et al., Childhood Sexual Assault Victims: Long-Term Outcomes After Testifying in Criminal Court (2005)
▪ Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. J.
Crim. l. & Criminology, 102, 119.
▪ Anthony J. Hicks & Jeanette A. Lawrence, Children’s Criteria for Procedural Justice: Developing a Young People’s
Procedural Justice Scale (1993)
▪ Gail S. Goodman et al., Testifying in Criminal Court: Emotional Effects on Child Sexual Assault Victims (1992)
309
310
Learning Objectives
• To understand how CSA processes occur in institutional settings.
Material: The movie titled ‘Athlete A’. The movie may be accessed on various OTT platforms.
Synopsis of Film
Athlete A is a 2020 American documentary film directed by Bonni
Cohen and Jon Shenk. The documentary follows a team of investigative
journalists from The Indianapolis Star as they broke the story of
doctor Larry Nassar sexually assaulting young female gymnasts, and the
subsequent allegations that engulfed USA Gymnastics and its then-
CEO Steve Penny. It was released on June 24, 2020, by Netflix.
In 2015, gymnast Maggie Nichols, a brilliant gymnast who appeared to be on track to make the Olympic team, is
sexually abused by Nassar at the Karolyi Ranch. The ranch was overseen by Béla and Márta Károlyi, the fabled
trainers who had come out of Nicolae Ceaușescu’s Romania and led the U.S. team with a severe-bordering-on-
cruel approach that was part of their mystique. Inside it, the Károlyis practiced their special brand of discipline,
tormenting teenage gymnasts about their weight, calling them lazy, treating them like machines who needed to
310
311
push themselves to the boundaries and beyond. Within the military-like training-camp fortress of Huntsville, Larry
Nassar, according to the documentary, was the girls’ one friendly authority figure — an amiable quirky goofball
who would sometimes slip them food and candy. He never gave them explicit threats, even when committing
abuses like putting an un-gloved finger inside a girl’s vagina as part of an “exam.” He always maintained the
fiction that he was their friend. Most of them knew that something was deeply wrong, but they felt they had
nowhere to turn. However, Nichols reveals the abuse to her coach who informs her parents. Her parents are called
by Penny who informs them he has reached out to law enforcement to investigate the abuse. Despite her selection
looking imminent, Nichols was not selected to represent Team USA at the 2016 Rio Olympics.
In 2016 The Star publishes its investigation into Nassar and Denhollander goes to the police with her evidence
against Nassar. Maggie Nichols's parents, frustrated with the lack of information about their daughter's case reach
out to a lawyer who is working with other victims and discover that USA Gymnastics was told of abuse going back
at least as far as 2012. The criminal prosecution of Nassar goes forward and he reaches a plea deal in 2017.
Nevertheless, The Star continues to investigate the abuses perpetrated by USA Gymnastics.
Penny is eventually arrested in 2017 for his role in covering up Nassar's abuse.
Nichols leaves elite gymnastics after being left off the 2016 USA gymnastics Olympics team which the
documentary implies was because of her role in coming forward against Nassar. She competes
in NCAA gymnastics which reinvigorates her love of the sport.
Discussion
• What was the most unforgettable moment in the film for you?
• What is the process by which Nassar abused the girls? Did he use his professional knowledge and position
of authority to perpetrate? If yes, then how?
• What are certain factors (circumstances) that made these young athletes vulnerable to CSA?
• How can institutions enable and propagate CSA?
• What were the barriers (both systemic and social) to disclosure that the various athletes face?
• What are certain issues pertaining to mandatory reporting that could be observed in the film? What was
the systemic response to reporting by these athletes?
311
312
• To understand child development and how it determines the child’s competency and capacity to provide
evidence.
• To apply child development concepts to issues of validity and reliability of evidence provided by child
witnesses.
• To learn methods and techniques to assess child’s developmental and mental health capacity to provide
evidence.
Time
4 Hours
Concept
Despite the existence of a special law such as POCSO, and the many allowances it makes to enable child witnesses
to depose (see table 1), the law is still required to be implemented within the adversarial justice system. The
adversarial justice system ‘seeks the truth’ by pitting the parties against each other, in the hope of the facts being
revealed. This requires CSA victims to depose in court, particularly as child victims are often the only source of
information about the crime in the wake of CSA dynamics, and of abuse occurring in private, usually in the
Table 1: Key Legal Provisions on Procedure and Powers of Special Courts for Recording Evidence of
Child Witnesses
• Prosecution and defense questions to child witness to be communicated to the judge, who in turn,
puts the questions to the child.
• Permitting of frequent breaks for child witness during trial processes.
• Allowing for family member/guardian/person whom child trusts to be present in courtroom.
• Maintenance of dignity of child by disallowing for aggressive questioning and those which result in
character assassination of child.
• Conducting the trial through 'in-camera' proceedings and ensuring that identity of the child is
undisclosed.
• Using video conferencing or single visibility mirrors/devices to record evidence.
• Safeguarding the child from exposure to accused at the time of statement recording, despite the need
for the presence of the accused in court for hearing the child’s evidence.
• Ensuring child is not called repeatedly to testify in court.
• Appointment of support persons to assist children through investigative and trial processes.
*Source: Chapter VIII, POCSO Act 2012(Ministry of Law and Justice, 2012)
312
313
Much child witness research is focussed on the implications for children’s performance in legal proceedings,
including for interviewing children in forensic settings and eliciting their testimony in court. It has also highlighted
the need to adopt a developmental perspective to consider children’s cognitive, memory and communicative
abilities, and their emotional states, so as to obtain a truthful narrative from the child. In doing so, it has inevitably
touched upon the question that lies at the heart of the child witness testimony—that of child witness competency
or children’s capacity to provide testimony.
Child witnesses are required to contend with the adversarial justice system, wherein they are expected to provide
evidence, preferably through a verbal narrative, that requires not only ‘adult-like’ language and communication
capacities, but also advanced levels of attention, concentration, memory, and other cognitive functions, as well as
emotional regulation abilities that would allow them to provide evidence in ways that meet the evidentiary
standards of the court. Additionally, child witnesses are expected to be able to respond to often-difficult cross-
examination processes, wherein their primary narrative is subject to scrutiny and questioning, with the explicit aim
to discredit the evidence they have provided. (Refer to figure 1 below, which shows the tensions that eliciting child
witness evidence entail).
As Brennan9 pertinently states: “Evidence is displayed to discredit the witness and thus bolster the case for the
defendant. The techniques used are all created with words, since they are the major currency of the court, and the
extent to which the child's language abilities can be expected to match those of the cross-examiner's, are the
subject of my concern. The extent to which truth is prejudiced by the use of these language tactics is a question to
which the legal profession must address itself”. (Brennan, 1995), PP 73
In this context the role of mental health professionals (and/or other child care service providers engaged in
assisting child witnesses) becomes critical, i.e. (i) to conducting developmental and mental health assessments to
determine child competencies i.e. to ascertain whether a given child would have the capacity to testify in court; (ii)
9
Brennan, M. (1995). The discourse of denial: Cross-examining child victim witnesses. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(1), 71–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00032-A
313
314
provide a report to the court on the child’s capacities to testify, including recommendations for any special
assistance or support that a child may require (based on her capacities or the lack of them), in order to testify.
Thus, child witness competency assessments, with a view to informing the court of a given child’s capacities to
testify (and the gaps thereof) are critical to maintaining the precepts of child rights and procedural justice. Take for
example a child with mild intellectual disability or a child with Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder:
recommendations to the court to keep the overall length of the deposition short, granting frequent breaks to such
children, and ensuring other enablements with regard to phrasing of questions in brief and simple ways, would be
critical to obtaining testimony from them. The recognition that child witnesses do not have the same mental
capacities of an average adult witness, and consequently will not have the same competencies to testify in court, is
essential to eliciting child witness testimony—and ascertaining the unique capacities of each child witness is the
first step in the process.
What the Indian law says about child witness testimony—and the challenges thereof
This raises the question of how to examine or elicit evidence from very young children and/or those with
disabilities. While there is no debate regarding eliciting evidence from a child who is under 2 years of age,
because it is obvious (and indeed part of general knowledge) that a child so young will not have the capacity to
speak and provide narrative evidence.
However, the lines become blurred when a child is about 2.5 to 3 years of age-- and has developed some skills in
speech and language. Or would a 10-year old with intellectual disability have the capacity to provide evidence?
What about a 14-year old with speech and hearing impairments…? The question is: given their developmental
abilities, to what extent such children would be able to provide valid and reliable evidence? And two related
questions are: what types of evidence can one obtain from such children, and how to examine and elicit evidence
from such child witnesses?
Furthermore, according to the Indian Evidence Act, in criminal proceedings, ‘a person of any age is competent to
give evidence if he or she is able to (1) understand questions put to him or her as a witness, and (2) give answers
to them which can be understood.’ Thus, the parameters for assessing child witnesses’ competencies, and
determining whether a given child can provide valid and reliable evidence, are extremely limited i.e. they do not
capture a host of issues that the court needs to be cognizant of in making decisions about the competencies of
child witnesses.
314
315
Within international literature and the practice, the law grants two types of child witness
competency:
(i) Basic competency, referring to the child’s ability to perceive, remember and communicate; this
also suggests that children’s testimonial performance is strongly related to their (expressive and
receptive) language abilities, which are predictors of eye witness memory and suggestibility, and of
the accuracy of their responses to free recall and direct, non-leading questions. This competency
may be extended to encompassing the socio-emotional and mental health factors that play an
important role in children’s cognition and memory reports.
(ii) Truth-lie competency, concerning the child’s ability to distinguish between fact and fiction, and
to understand the importance of telling the truth because the veracity and lie-telling abilities of the
child are associated elements of competency.
For further information and understanding on Forensic Issues in Eliciting Evidence from
Young Children i.e. (Preschool Children) listen to Karen Hollely of Child Witness Institute,
South Africa, on SAMVAD’s Youtube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZIETQE9OwM&list=PL6M-
G4mGr43pEXa4vW0CsOGcVYcvUPivr&index=3
This is part of a 4-part public series that SAMVAD organized as one of its ‘10 years of POCSO’
events in March 2022. The session discusses the relevant cognitive and language limitations of
children in this age category and identify ways of eliciting evidence from children that is accurate
and forensically sound, highlighting key areas of misunderstanding in cases of child sexual abuse."
315
316
Knowledge of Sequences
Recognizing Spaces Required for child’s narrative on details regarding
place of abuse.
Identifying Similarities & Differences • Indicative of child’s capacities to differentiate
between the appearance of objects and
people.
• Important to establish child’s ability to
identify perpetrator
Memory • Required for communication facts about
Descriptive Ability which they are knowledgeable because they
directly perceived and remember them.
• Also important for provision of details of the
abuse narrative.
Differentiating between Truth & Lies • Indicative of child’s ability to distinguish
between fact and fiction or fantasy.
• Required for child to be able to provide an
accurate account of the abuse incident.
As mentioned earlier, specifically, this role and function entails the following:
• Providing developmental assessments to the child witness.
• Communicating with the court to provide information on:
o The child witness’s developmental capacities.
o Recommendations for whether child can provide testimony.
316
317
While developmental assessments may comprise of various psychological scales and tools, and professionals are
welcome to administer these (particular standardized IQ tests), it is recommended that these formal tests be
administered to support and corroborate clinical impressions of the child’s abilities as necessary for providing
testimony. Drawing from the above discussions on child witness competencies necessary for testifying in court, we
may further narrow these to 9 core competencies. Refer to table above for this list of core competencies—and
how they are critical to child witness testimony.
Materials: Picture cards, low-cost aids to assess the various developmental competencies required
for child witness testimony (refer to picture cards and activity sheets provided in ‘Additional
Materials’ at the end of this module.
• Ask each sub-group to work through the activities i.e. practice using them with one to
persons in the group playing the role of the child (so as to provide an understanding of how
to implement the developmental assessment with children).
317
318
Process:
o You may also compare what you now see with the previous activity you did—how
you assessed developmental competencies.
• Play the clips one by one—there are nine clips in all, as follows:
o Identifying Common Objects and their functions
o Describing Actions & Behaviours
o Identifying Body Parts
o Knowledge of Sequences
o Recognizing Spaces
o Identifying Similarities & Differences
o Memory
o Descriptive Ability
o Differentiating between Truth & Lies
• Use the questions listed below for discussion following the viewing of each clip (i.e. do not
view all 9 clips and then proceed to discussion as the points made for each individual clip
are likely to vary).
Discussion:
• Share your thoughts on the method of assessing competency (in each clip)…how this is
relevant to provision to child witness testimony?
• Suggest alternative methods to assess these competencies in child witnesses (based on
availability of materials, limitations of time and socio-cultural contexts).
• How do you corroborate information provided by the child, to determine its accuracy?
• The need to ensure that assessments and their results are in accordance with normative
child development i.e. for example, pre-schoolers cannot be asked very specific questions
about time as this concept is still developing in them.
318
319
• Consider emotional state of the child i.e. whether he/she is in a state of PTSD, to decide on
an appropriate time for the assessment (including time of day—so that child is not
hungry/sleepy/tired/cranky…as these could yield inaccurate results).
• The importance of assessing competencies in non-CSA contests—as this helps to establish
a child’s abilities in neutral situations—making increasing the validity and reliability of these
assessments.
• Discuss the importance of systematic documentation of child witness competencies,
including:
o The methods used for assessment (tasks or activities done with the child)
o Child’s responses to each task/activity
o Analysis of child’s response (i.e. was it age-appropriate?) and child abilities (or the
lack of them)—to what extent a given ability is present (low/high…)
o Implications for child’s capacity to testify in court
o Supports and interventions that the child may require in order to testify in court --
these must be predicated on the child’s deficits or gaps in (developmental) abilities)
319
320
Table: Summarizing Children’s Capacity to Provide Evidence, according to Age & Developmental Stage10
Emotional-Behavioural
Age Ability to Provide Abuse Narratives
Symptoms Indicative of Abuse
Infancy • Unable to make any disclosures of physical or sexual abuse. • Fearful of the offender,
(0—18 • Cases can only be substantiated if: • Fussier than normal
months)
✓ There is an eye witness; • Reluctant to have diaper changed
✓ Perpetrator confesses; • Occasionally imitate sexual acts.
✓ Infants are found to have an STD, sperm or semen on their examination, and/or
genital injuries.
Toddlers • Due their limited communication skills, toddlers are unlikely to report the abuse. • Frequently show fear and anxiety around
the perpetrator.
(18—36 • Simple phrases may be the only clue that something has happened, such as, "Owie,
months) pee-pee, Daddy" while pointing to their genital area (indicating that Daddy touched • May mimic the sexual acts with their own
or hurt them in this area). bodies, other children, or dolls.
• Toddlers cannot sequence time and place very well and will probably not be able to • Regressive behaviours observable.
tell you how often something has happened, when it happened, or even where it
• Difficulty toilet training, sleep
happened.
disturbances
• Only some children of this age group know their body parts or understand right from
• Angry outbursts and clinginess to
wrong.
caregivers.
• To substantiate the abuse, a witness, a confession, an STD, or sperm/semen are
usually required—and/or evidence of injury.
10
. Adapted from ‘The Art of The Interview In Child Abuse Cases’ by Captain Barbara Craig, Medical Consultant for Child Abuse and Neglect, Department of Pediatrics, National
Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland available on http://www.nccpeds.com/powerpoints/interview.html
320
321
Preschool • During an interview, they become easily distracted, and revert to physical • May exhibit sexualized play, somatic
activity, or phrases such as "I don't know" or "I can't remember". complaints (headaches, abdominal pain,
(3—5-year-olds)
painful urination, genital discomfort, etc)
• Tend to tell small excerpts of their abuse with minimal detail, disorganized
May also have nightmares, regressed
thought processes, and give relevant and irrelevant details.
behaviour, anger, aggression, withdrawal,
• Time and space relationships are poorly defined; however they can relate mood lability and other psychosocial
things to before and after such as birthdays holidays, dinner, bedtime, etc. problems.
• They can on occasion be specific and give enough detail to be good
witnesses in court.
• Demonstration is a better tool than verbalization for many children this
age.
• They may confuse he-she-me and sex specific body parts.
• Although substantiation may still rely on finding acute injuries, sperm or
semen, or an STD, their history becomes increasingly important.
• Ask short and specific questions, but do not put words in their mouths.
• Asking them to draw or demonstrate what happened might be easier for
them than verbal communication.
• Make the child feel at ease and safe—they may be fearful of what will
happen to them if they tell.
Elementary • Children of this age are reluctant and tentative in their disclosures and will • Feel conflicted and confused, guilt
school aged withdraw if they perceive non-reassuring reactions from the interviewer. ridden, embarrassed and may be fearful
children
• Role play may be an appropriate tool, as well as drawing and the use of • Behavioural symptoms may include
(6—9 years old) dolls and doll houses. withdrawal, depression, emotional
lability, nightmares, poor school
• Building rapport is essential before the interview begins because they are
performance, aggression, lying, stealing,
frequently embarrassed and uncomfortable discussing the inappropriate
and other antisocial behaviours.
touching.
• Physical symptoms may include enuresis,
• One way to ease their discomfort is to engage them in a simultaneous
321
322
activity like drawing, colouring, or working a simple puzzle. encopresis, dysuria, headaches,
abdominal pain, genital pain, and tics.
Puberty • Usually more at ease with an interviewer of the same sex. • Shame, guilt—feelings that the abuse
was their fault.
(9—13-year- • A more formal approach to the interview frequently minimizes the pre-
olds) adolescents’ discomfort with the discussion. • They not only feel uncomfortable about
the sexual molestation, but are feeling
• Keep your questions brief and clinically oriented, yet let them know that
awkward and self-conscious about their
their feelings and opinions are also important to the investigation.
bodies and discussions regarding sexual
• Reassure them that they are not at fault for what has happened. issues.
Adolescents • To maximize the outcome of the interview, an open, direct approach is • Behavioural problems may include
(13—18-year- usually the best. defiant, aggressive acts, truancy or school
olds) failure, criminal behaviour, suicidal
• Be serious about their concerns and supportive of their needs. Never
ideation or attempts, high risk sexual
criticize or judge their acts.
behaviour, substance abuse, self-
• By being honest with them, they will be more likely to be cooperative with mutilation and runaway behaviour.
you.
• They may present to the medical clinic
with chronic aches and pains, vague
complaints, and hysteria.
322
323
Case Examples of Mental Health & Developmental Assessments to Establish Children’s Capacity to
Provide Evidence
Effective legal assistance in the context of child sexual abuse, particularly forensic interviewing of child witnesses,
should ideally entail a major role for child mental health services in the following ways:
• To conduct mental health and developmental assessments for affected children in order to screen for
mental health morbidity and ascertain the psychological impact of child sexual abuse (CSA).
• To use the developmental and mental health assessments to ascertain the child’s capacity to provide
evidence/ testimony as child witness.
• To assist legal personnel to interview and gather evidence from the children, using sensitive and child-
friendly methods of interviewing.
Such ways of implementing the child sexual abuse law will go a long way in ensuring that evidence from children
is accurately and sensitively recorded, and in increasing the concerningly low conviction rates for perpetrators of
child sexual abuse in India. The challenges that the judicial system currently faces, with regard to reliability of a
child's testimony, due to age and developmental abilities, the appropriateness of gathering evidence from very
young children (3 years and below) and methods and modalities of gathering evidence from children, may also be
circumvented to some extent.
The use of systematic child-friendly methods may also encourage more children and families to overcome their
reluctance to report to legal authorities and to follow through with court processes, thus allowing for prosecution
of child sexual abuse perpetrators.
Following the sexual abuse of children in a child care institution in one of the Indian states (allegedly by the
caregivers of the institution), a central government agency undertook the investigation of the case. The agency
had been issued directives by the Supreme Court to only interview the children with the help of/ in the presence
of qualified child mental health professionals. It therefore requested the Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry to
assist with interviewing and evidence gathering from the affected children. The NIMHANS team assisted the
agency’s investigative officers to interview and gather evidence from the children, using sensitive and child-
friendly methods of interviewing. Specific protocols and specialized methods were used, to interview children,
depending on their developmental and communication abilities. Before even gathering the evidence or eliciting
abuse narratives, a developmental/psychiatric and mental health assessment was done for each individual child, in
order to determine the child’s capacity to provide evidence and testimony as child witness.
‘Additional Materials ’ at the end of this module contain examples of case reports to show how developmental &
mental health evaluations of children were conducted during the process of evidence gathering. [The names and
other identifying details have been removed for confidentiality reasons]. The first example describes a child with
intellectual disability; example 2 and 3 are both of children having psychiatric issues i.e. post-traumatic disorders,
but with varying capacities to provide evidence and testimony.
323
324
1. Basic Information
Name: XXXXX Name of Institution/Agency: XXXXXXXXXXXX
2. Presenting Problems/Complaints
Referred for mental health evaluation and evidence gathering by XX agency in the context of child sexual abuse in
child care institution vide the Supreme Court Order No. XXXX in W.P. (C). No. XXXXXX dated XXXXXX.
3. Developmental assessment:
a) Caregiver Report:
As reported by the institution caregiver, the child was generally withdrawn and displayed no interest in social
interaction. She could follow very basic commands like ‘bring the glass’ or ‘fetch water’. She was dependent on
the home-mother for her personal care that included feeding and toileting. There was history suggestive of
self-injurious behaviour with no clear antecedents.
b) Developmental Scales: Her social age was 2 years & 5 months (on Vineland Social Maturity Scale) and
social quotient was 22. The test scores indicate that her social quotient points to severe intellectual disability.
Medical Problems:Not assessed in detail by NIMHANS team.[Child had multiple excoriations and healed
abrasions over the face, neck and arms which were self-inflicted and arising from self-injurious behaviour
pertaining to intellectual disability].
Context: Child sexual abuse and trafficking issues within a child care institution
6. Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness:
As the child does not have age-appropriate developmental and communication abilities, she does not have the
capacity to provide valid and reliable evidence/ testimony.
7. Care Plan (List actions taken or planned by the assessment agency/ case worker to assist the
child, such as emergency actions/ measures to address immediate concerns, referrals made to
other agencies/depth work).
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
324
325
1. Basic Information
Name: XXXXXXXX Name of Institution/Agency: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
2. Presenting Problems/Complaints
None reported by child/ agency.
Referred for mental health evaluation and evidence gathering by XX agency in the context of child sexual
abuse in child care institution.
3. Institutional History(where all the child has been /lived, for what periods of time, experiences
and difficulties, circumstances of coming to this agency)
Initially, the child reported that she was from X (no further address provided).
Later, however, she said that she used to stay along with her uncles and grandmother in Q until she was
10 years old. While she was on her way back from the school, she lost her way and then she was taken to
the police station from where she went through Childline, and was placed in the X shelter home. She was in
X shelter home for 5 years. [However, shortly after, the child said she does not recall how she reached X].
7. Work Experiences (Child labour experiences: why child had to work/ how child found place
of work (trafficking?)/where the child was working, hours of work, amount of remuneration
received/whether this was regular, any form of abuse encountered at the place of work/ how
the owner and others treated child.)
Unclear/ not known as the child did not report.
8. Physical, Sexual & Emotional Abuse Experiences *(Ask Child/ Child’s report)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
[Evidence recorded but removed for reasons of confidentiality].
325
326
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii) At which times do you feel really very worried? Describe when/in what situations.
The child appeared exceedingly anxious but was unable to report details of it, whether in the shelter home or
in her current home.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
i) Look at the feelings thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how sad/bad do you feel?
(Mark it).
ii) At which times do you feel really very sad? Describe when/in what situations.
iii) Have you ever felt like life is not worth living/ you don’t want this life…? When? Tell me what you
do at such times.
No sadness/depression symptoms reported by the child currently. [This needs further evaluation].
However, the child had self-injury marks (of cutting) on her forearm. These were old scars, of cutting that
she had engaged in during her time in X shelter. These are indicative of distress experienced in that shelter.
There are no new self-injury marks i.e. the child has stopped cutting behaviours since removal from X shelter.
9.2. Anger
i) Look at the ‘feelings’ thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how angry (or irritable)
do you feel? (Mark it).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii) At which times do you feel really very angry? Describe when/ in what situations/ what do
people do to make you angry.
326
327
Context: Child sexual abuse and trafficking issues within child care institution
Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness:
The child has some mental health issues related to PTSD/ chronic trauma and significant social anxiety; her
developmental and communication abilities may be age-appropriate and she appears to have the capacity to
provide valid and reliable evidence/ testimony. However, her anxiety in social situations, combined with her
anxieties as part of PTSD symptoms, may make it challenging for her to provide adequate evidence. Given the
impact of chronic trauma and the ensuing mistrust of most persons around, she will require tremendous
rapport building using non-verbal communication and creative activities (such as art) followed by gradual
verbal interactions to enable her to build trust.
12. Care Plan (List actions taken or planned by the assessment agency/ case worker to assist the
child, such as emergency actions/ measures to address immediate concerns, referrals made to
other agencies/depth work).
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
327
Example 3: Child with Post-Traumatic Disorder (Having Capacity to Provide Evidence)
328
Assessment for Children in Institutions/Childcare Agencies
Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, NIMHANS
1. Basic Information
Name: XXXXXX Name of Institution/Agency: XXXXXX
2. Presenting Problems/Complaints
None reported by child/ agency
Referred for mental health evaluation and evidence gathering by XX agency in the context of child sexual abuse
in child care institution.
3. Institutional History(where all the child has been /lived, for what periods of time, experiences
and difficulties, circumstances of coming to this agency)
Child reports that she lived at home until a year and a half ago. When she was fifteen years of age her bua
and mama took her to Z and sold her into a family. She was coerced to marry a forty year old man. When she
protested, the forty year old husband told her ‘You cannot go because your aunt has taken money in exchange
for you’. The child stayed there for two days and then ran away. She was about to take a train from Z
railway station to return home but the police caught her and placed her in a home in Zwhere she stayed for
two months. Following this she was transferred to XX shelter home as per the CWC orders (as her family
home is in P). Following the rescue of the children at XX shelter, on XXXX (date), the child was placed in YY Home.
7. Work Experiences (Child labour experiences: why child had to work/ how child found place of
work (trafficking?)/where the child was working, hours of work, amount of remuneration
received/whether this was regular, any form of abuse encountered at the place of work/ how the
owner and others treated child.)
While at home (before going to place X) the child was working as domestic help in a neighbouring house.
8. Physical, Sexual & Emotional Abuse Experiences *(Ask Child/ Child’s report)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
[Evidence recorded but removed for reasons of confidentiality].
328
9. Feelings and Emotions
329
9.1. Anxiety
i) Look at the feelings thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how worried do you feel? (Mark it).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
ii) At which times do you feel really very worried? Describe when/in what situations.
The child’s anxiety symptoms are characteristic of post-traumatic stress disorder. (As detailed below)
Depression and Self-Harm Risks
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
iv) Look at the feelings thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how sad/bad do you feel?
(Mark it).
v) At which times do you feel really very sad? Describe when/in what situations.
The child reported experiencing pervasive low mood, decreased interest in previously pleasurable activities,
death wishes and suicidal ideations especially when experiencing flashbacks or recollections of the traumatic
events. It was observed that the child had multiple incision marks over her forearms from self-injurious
behaviour that she had engaged in, in the context of PTSD and severe depression.
vi) Have you ever felt like life is not worth living/ you don’t want this life…? When? Tell me what
you do at such times.
Child reported that she would frequently experience active death wishes and frequent suicidal ideations.
9.4. Anger
iv) Look at the ‘feelings’ thermometer and tell me, for most of the time, how angry (or irritable)
do you feel? (Mark it).
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
v) At which times do you feel really very angry? Describe when/ in what situations/ what do
people do to make you angry.
Child’s anxiety and depressive symptoms are cross sectionally more prominent than her anger.
329
330
10. Any Other Observations of the Child:
Time-place orientation/ thought processes/ cooperativeness, rapport, social responsiveness/
Attentiveness & Activity level/ Speech and language skills:
While the child was waiting to be interviewed, she suddenly had an outburst of crying, and she later explained
how thoughts of the abuse experiences keep coming back to her mind at random times (a symptom of PTSD).
She became very tearful and needed much reassurance during the interview as well. However, despite her
intense distress, she was also resolute in that she wished to narrate all that had happened to her, saying
several times over that despite her distress she would like to tell the truth and recount what had happened
to her. She was thus able to provide clear sequential accounts of her abuse experiences including details of time,
place and person—and was amenable to soothing and reassurance at times when she became emotional and
highly distressed during some parts of the interview.
Psychiatric Diagnosis: Post traumatic stress disorder and severe depressive episode
Context:Child sexual abuse and trafficking issues within child care institution
Implications for developmental and mental health capacity to provide evidence/ testimony as child
witness:
As the child has age-appropriate developmental and communication abilities, she has the capacity to provide
valid and reliable evidence/ testimony. She also has some mental health issues by way of depression and PTSD—
but this in no way impacts the validity or reliability of her evidence. The way in which her PTSD symptoms
manifest are such that the child is open to sharing and expressing her abuse and distress experiences.
However, given her high levels of intense distress, she requires gentle and sensitive ways of inquiry, with
adequate preparation, soothing and reassurance prior to and during the course of her narrative.
12. Care Plan (List actions taken or planned by the assessment agency/ case worker to assist the
child, such as emergency actions/ measures to address immediate concerns, referrals made to
other agencies/depth work).
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
330
331
Suggested Readings
▪ Malloy, L. C., La Rooy, D. J., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2011). Developmentally sensitive interviewing for legal
purposes. Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice, 1-13.
▪ Lyon, T. D. (2011). Assessing the competency of child witnesses: Best practice informed by psychology and
law. Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice, 69-85.
▪ Bala, N., Lee, J., & McNamara, E. (2001). Children as witnesses: Understanding their capacities, needs, and
experiences. Journal of Social Distress and the Homeless, 10(1), 41-68.
▪ Nurcombe, B. (1986). The child as witness: Competency and credibility. Journal of the American Academy of
Child Psychiatry, 25(4), 473-480.
▪ Bull, R. (2010). The investigative interviewing of children and other vulnerable witnesses: Psychological
research and working/professional practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 5-23.
▪ Steward, M. S., Bussey, K., Goodman, G. S., & Saywitz, K. J. (1993). Implications of developmental research
for interviewing children. Child abuse & neglect, 17(1), 25-37.
▪ Kim, T. K., Choi, S., & Shin, Y. J. (2011). Psychosocial factors influencing competency of children's
statements on sexual trauma. Child abuse & neglect, 35(3), 173-179.
▪ Kruger, S., Pretorius, H. G., & Diale, B. M. (2016). A psychological perspective on competency testing of the
child victim and witness of sexual offences in South Africa. Child Abuse research: A South African
Journal, 17(2), 1-12.
▪ Ruck, M. D. (1996). Why children think they should tell the truth in court: Developmental considerations for
the assessment of competency. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(Part 1), 103–
116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00310.x
▪ Lyon, T. D. (2011). Assessing the competency of child witnesses: Best practice informed by psychology and
law. Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice, 69-85.
▪ Ahern, E. C., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). Do prosecutors use interview instructions or build
rapport with child witnesses?. Behavioural sciences & the law, 33(4), 476-492.
▪ Bala, N., Lee, K., Lindsay, R., & Talwar, V. (2000). A Legal & (and) Psychological Critique of the Present
Approach to the Assessment of the Competence of Child Witnesses. Osgoode Hall LJ, 38, 409.
▪ Munro, F. M., & Carlin, M. T. (2002). Witness competency—Truthfulness and reliability assessment: The role
of the psychologist. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7(1), 15-23.
332
Additional Materials
Materials for Activity on ‘Assessing Child Witness Competencies for Testimony—Do It Yourself!’
Establishing Child Competency (1)
Identifying Common Objects, Size, Shape & Colour
Objective:
• To establish basic cognitive abilities.
Materials: Daily objects of use (such as spectacles, book, cup…) or pictures of the same
Method:
• Explain to child: “We are going to play a game now in which I ask you some simple questions…if you can
answer, that’s fine, if not, that’s ok too. Let’s start…”
(i) Pick up objects or pictures of objects and hold them up…present them to the child, one by one.
• Ask the child:
o What is this?
o What is this used for? (Or what do we do with this?)
o Alternatively, say “when it rains, we use…” or “people who cannot see properly need to use…” or
[ask child to pick the object/picture that would fit]
(ii) Point to child’s clothing or yours, or to different objects in the room…
Ask the child:
o What colour is this?
o Can you show me something on this table that is [red] or [blue] colour?
(Ask about primary colours such as red/blue/green/yellow…avoid making it difficult with complex colours such as
‘purple’ or ‘turquoise blue’ as younger children may not be familiar with such colours).
(iii) Point to two to three objects on your table (such as paper weights or pens), of varying size.
ask the child:
o which is the biggest/ smallest/longest/shortest…
Or
If child’s parents/caregivers are present,
Ask the child:
o Who is taller…mummy or you?
o Who is bigger, daddy or you?
(iv) Present the child with paper cut-outs of shapes (square, triangle, circle)…or point/refer to objects that are in
these shapes.
Ask the child:
o What shape is this?
o Have you eaten ice-cream in a cone? What shape is the cone?
o What shape is this book?
o What shape are the windows of your house?
Or
Ask child:
o Can you show me something on this table that is round?
o Can you show me something in the room that is square?
333
*You may add any other pictures that you wish, as available.
335
Objective:
• To establish child’s ability to describe the abuse incidents/ what the perpetrator did to child.
Method:
*You may add any other pictures that you wish, as available.
338
Objective:
• To establish child’s ability to describe the abuse incidents/ what the perpetrator did to child.
Materials: Pictures of girl or boy, showing anatomical (body) parts or girl/boy doll
Method:
• Tell the child: “We are now going to play (another) game. Just like I asked you the name of different things,
I am going to show you a picture now of a boy/girl [or a doll] and ask you to name different body parts of
the boy/girl [doll]…let’s see how many body parts you can name! Shall we start…?”
• Use the picture or doll and point to different body parts, one by one.
• Start with ‘non-private’ body parts…eyes, nose, ears, mouth, teeth, head, hands, legs, fingers…then move to
asking to name/point to private parts.
Knowledge of Sequences
Objective:
• To establish child’s ability to describe the abuse incidents/ what the perpetrator did to child.
Method:
\
341
Estab
lishin
g
Child
Com
pete
ncy
(5)
Unde
rstan
ding
of
spac
e and
time
Obje
ctive:
To
estab
lish
child’
s orientation to place and time.
Materials: None
Method:
Objectives:
Method:
o Show the child the two cards with the same houses on it. Present each, one by one.
o Ask the child:
o What is this?
o [Correct, they are both houses]. Are they the same? Do they look the same? How so?
o Now present two cards with different houses on them:
o Ask the child:
o Are they the same? Do they look the same? How so?
Or
o Point to two objects in the room that belong to the same category…such as
cups/spectacles/watches/clocks/chairs…but that are different in appearance.
o Ask the child:
o What is this? (in reference to each pair of objects)
o Are they the same? Do they look the same?
o What differences can you see?
Or
Memory
Objectives:
o To understand child’s ability to recall and communication of facts about events witnessed or experienced.
Method (a):
o Tell the child: “We are going to now play a really fun memory game…”
o Mix the cards and place them face down on the table.
o Use an example and explain to child: “Each card has a pair…like here is a butterfly card [open and show
card to child]…we have to find the other butterfly card to match this one. We take turns to play…whoever
finds the most pairs is the winner.”
344
o Open one card (face up) and ask the child to find the pair to it.
o Several rounds of this is played…until the child has the opportunity to ‘open’ each card and possibly its
pair—by remembering where it was.
Method (b):
o Ask child if he/she remembers an event that happened a year ago—preferably a happy event, such as a
birthday or festival celebration.
Descriptive Ability
Objectives:
o To understand child’s ability for communication of facts about events witnessed or experienced.
Method:
Show the child (a given) picture.
Ask the child (with gentle prompts to encourage the child to say more):
o Tell me about this picture…tell me all that you see in it…
o What do you think is happening here?
o What are people doing?
o What colours are their clothes.
Or
Objectives:
o To understand if child would be able to provide an accurate (truthful) account of the abuse incident.
Method:
Concept
Childhood trauma, child sexual abuse dynamics, child development (and witness competencies) and the child’s
inner voice form some of the foundation pillars on which evidence gathering rests. Now, we will apply our
understanding of these four pillars to understand methods and techniques that mental health professionals and
medical professionals may use to elicit the child’s statement of abuse.
Materials: None
Method: Discussion
Process:
• Go around the room and ask the participants “What do you think is the key difference
between a forensic interview and a mental health interview?”
Discussion:
• Summarize the discussion by highlighting that the key difference between a forensic interview
versus a mental health interview is the purpose for which the interview is being conducted.
While a forensic interview in context of child sexual abuse is used by a professional to gather
all the information about the alleged incident of abuse to assist the courts and law
enforcement agencies in determining whether the incident of abuse had occurred or not. The
purpose of the interview is to produce evidence that will stand in the court as the criminal
prosecution is initiated. These interviews require objectivity, employ non leading techniques,
and emphasize on careful documentation of the interview, so that the interview findings can
stand up to the scrutiny in the court.
Material: Demo videos on the various processes of evidence eliciting (QR Codes for 4 videos
available at the end of the module under ‘Additional Material’.)
Process:
• Play each of the 4 videos and discuss as suggested.
• Ask the participants to observe the methods and strategies shown on the demo video.
Discussion:
• Ask the participants to share their thoughts on the video:
o What were some of things said/ steps followed by the counsellor to the child?
o What are some the child’s inner voices being answered through these steps?
o How do you think these steps will help in the interviewing process?
chances of the child trusting the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider and
sharing abuse experiences.
Introduce Yourself and the Space
• Tell the child who you are and what this space is that he/she has come to?
“My name is…my job here is to make sure that children are safe and no one hurts them. If we hear that
someone is hurting or troubling children, then we do things to stop that from happening.”
• Respond to child’s inner voice (fears & anxieties)
“You may be wondering about this busy place and many rooms…many people come here, just like you to talk
about people who have hurt or troubled them…that’s why we need a big space like this and many people to
help.”
“Although this place may seem a little scary and confusing, you are safe here…and after we have spent a little
time talking, you can go back home with your parents [caregiver]”.
It is difficult for children to enter into a conversation with someone they do not know and in a space that they are
afraid of or do not understand i.e. there is no context to a conversation unless children understand these. As part
of systemic procedures, sexually abused children would have had to visit several spaces such as hospitals, CWC,
even police the police station at times (though this is against the POCSO law), during the course of which they
have met many people to whom they have had to narrate their story. Children therefore become tired and anxious
and less cooperative when they have to repeatedly go through these visits and narrations, especially as they are
not aware who these people and places are. It is therefore important to allay children’s questions and fears about
the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider’s role and the space where the
child is being interviewed before starting the inquiry, so that they know who they are speaking with and why.
It is important to keep the introduction of the mental health professional/ medical professional / child care service
provider and the space simple and truthful and in accordance with the child’s age and developmental level. For
instance, introducing oneself as ‘I am the Dean of Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Unit of XYZ
Hospital or even ‘I am a counsellor’ is not useful as young children are not sure what to make of these technical
terms/ roles; such terms are not only intimidating but also not self-explanatory. Therefore, the function of the
mental health professional/ medical professional / child care service provider and of the space should be
explained to the child. It is also important that during the interview process if a camera or microphone is being
used, the child is familiarized with the equipment and explained why these devices are being used during the
interaction or the interview process. As seeing these fancy technical equipment can be can be overwhelming for
the child. They may worry that if they say something on camera and it gets recoded it may be used against them,
they will get in trouble if they are unable to explain something/ say something incorrectly or the recording may be
shared with other people. Therefore, the child(ren) can be told before the recording:
“As you can see, we have a video-camera and microphones here. They will record our conversation, so I can
remember everything you tell me. Sometimes I forget things and the recorder allows me to listen to you without
having to write everything down.”
In case you are not recording but taking down notes, you may say:
“I will note down the things that you tell me in my notebook as you speak to me. It is only because I sometimes
forget somethings…when I write down, I can always look back at my notes to remember all that you will tell me.”
Since adolescents are older, it would be necessary to introduce oneself and space first, as they will want to
understand these issues before they agree to engage in any sort of interaction or the process of evidence eliciting.
352
This introduction would be slightly different from the one provided to younger children as adolescents usually
have some understanding of court and judges and their functions. In fact, in case of children, while rapport
building is followed by introducing yourself and the space, in case of older children and adolescents, introducing
yourself and the space, need to be done first, followed by rapport building or getting to know the child.
Use toys and play activities
• The ‘Mobile Magic Bag’: Keep a small bag of toys (dolls, puzzles, picture books, colouring books…)
• Give the bag to the child as soon as (s)he comes to meet you for the interview (while they are waiting)
• Enter play with child and spend 5 to 10 minutes engaging child in play activity… ‘What are you doing? What is
the doll doing? May I see what you are colouring?’
Providing children with toys, play and art materials is one part of helping them feel less threatened in what is a
potentially intimidating space, creating some sense of normalcy; children may also infer from the availability of
play materials that other children come to this space and that this space is therefore geared to receiving children.
All this helps them feel more relaxed and comfortable, thereby preparing them to be more trusting and
communicative, thus increasing the chances of providing a coherent statement (or reducing the chances of
retraction of statement, which happens frequently because children feel threatened, fearful and uncomfortable in
a strange and formal spaces). Older children and adolescents (12 years+) can also be given materials to engage
them while they wait for the interview (with the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care
service provider) and after. However, materials should include board games, books and art materials (not toys and
dolls, which are meant for engaging younger children).
The most critical part to creating a child friendly space is the skills of the mental health professional/ medial
professional/ child care service provider—this is what finally makes for a child-centric service and therefore an
353
environment where children feel reassured and at ease. In the absence of mental health professional/ medial
professional/ child care service provider’s skills to engage children, even toys and play materials may not have the
desired effect or render the space truly child friendly.
Often, adults’ idea of talking with children is asking questions. However, a conversation is not a series of questions
that is asked by one person and answered by the other—this would be an inquiry, rather like what the police do,
thus creating a sense of power and hierarchy rather than one of comfort and openness. It is therefore necessary
for the magistrate/judge to engage the child in a casual conversation about the child’s everyday life, such as
school, games, interests and hobbies. The interaction can involve questions but must also include some
statements and sharing/ responses by the professional, so that the child does not get a sense that it is an
interrogation.
The mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider entering into the child’s play
activity for a few minutes, followed by neutral questions and general conversation, provides a less formal, less
intimidating and more casual and child-friendly way of initiating interactions with the child, and provides a
scaffolding for further conversation, building up to queries about the child’s abuse experience. In other words, if
the professional (interviewing the child) does not spend some time building a rapport with the child, there is no
context for the child to engage in interactions with him/her, let alone discussing difficult and traumatic
experiences of abuse.
• “What did you eat for breakfast today?”
• “How did you come here today?” (Bus, car…)
• “Guess what I saw on my way here…”
• “…blue is your favourite colour? Red is my favourite colour…like you, I also like ice-cream very much…”
• “I would like to know a little more about you… tell me where you live and what school you go to…” *
• “Tell me a little about the things you like doing…” *
• “What do you think you want to do when you grow up…”
(*For use with slightly older children (ages 8+)
354
Many mental health professionals/ medical professionals/ child care service providers have reported
how they make children comfortable by providing them with food and refreshments such as
chocolate, juice etc. While the intention is to show friendliness and concern to the child, there are
two innate problems with this well-intentioned gesture. For many children, the processes of sexual
abuse perpetration have entailed precisely such actions of proffering food and sweets, to lure them
and then abuse them. Therefore, such actions might confuse children causing them to
misunderstand the actions of the mental health professionals/ medical professionals/ child care
service provider, thereby creating fear and hesitation to interact further. Another problem with this
well-intentioned action is that there is the danger of the child mis-interpreting this gesture as a lure
and inducement to provide information. This would then compromise the neutrality that is required
when conducting interviews for evidence gathering in the context of a sensitive issue such as child
sexual abuse.
Of course, many children travel long distances for the interview; they are tired and in need of food
and refreshments and a space to relax before entering the interview process/ providing evidence.
Therefore, it is suggested that all food and refreshments be provided to the child:
• Outside the interview room (i.e. not in the space where the evidence is to be gathered).
• Before the interview begins.
• By persons who do not play any role in interviewing process (therefore not by the mental
health professionals/ medical professionals/ child care service provider).
Mental health professionals/ medical professionals/ child care service provider therefore need to
use other rapport building skills, not food, to create a relaxed, comfortable and child-friendly space
for evidence gathering.
And yes, it is possible to talk to children about serious and sensitive matters without chocolate! The
Dept. of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry at NIMHANS, interviews over a hundred children every day
in their out-patient facility and there are no biscuits, chocolates or sweets!
Abuse Inquiry
All the above statements are ways in which the inquiry can be initiated with the child. In interviewing, there are
two types of questions: close ended questions and open-ended questions. You will notice that all of the above are
phrased as open-ended questions.
Have you ever done a survey? What kind of questions does a survey contain? Usually they are close ended—which
means that a question can have only one possible, specific response like ‘yes’ or ‘no;’ even where there are
multiple options for answers, the respondent is allowed to select only one or select more than one from the
options presented i.e. he/she cannot give a detailed descriptions of other responses he/she may have to the
question.
For example, a survey question may ask ‘does your child get enough food to eat?’ and the answer option are ‘yes’
or ‘no’; or ‘what are the causes of child malnutrition?’ and the answer options may be ‘dirty water’, ‘poor
sanitation’, ‘inadequate quantity of food available’…but if the respondent has other views on causes of
malnutrition, there is no room to express them.
The limitation of close-ended questions is that they do not help explore what happened in a detailed manner or
encourage the child to talk about all the aspects and dimensions of his/her situation. Children are unlikely to tell
you what happened or how they feel unless you create a space for them to do so—close-ended questions do not
create this space and allow for information to come freely from them. Also, children (already used to adult,
hierarchical ways of communication) are afraid to tell you the whole story and/or they think you don’t want to
know or that is all you want to know i.e. if you don’t ask, they won’t tell!
This is not to say that close-ended questions should never be used. They are certainly useful and necessary—when
specific information needs to be elicited such as time, place and name of person, for these can have only one
answer—when, where, whom? The point is to use close-ended questions, but to a lesser extent with children, and
in ways that will not block further information/ response.
Open-Ended Questions: What, How, Why?
These types of question lead to elaborate answers that do not end in one word. They help to explore How and
Why issues, thereby eliciting detailed, descriptive information from the child.
Open-ended questions encourage the child to give his/her perceptions, opinions, and viewpoints so that the
mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider is better able to understand events
and issues from the child’s perspective. When exploring children’s experiences of trauma and abuse, it is more
useful to use open-ended questions in order to gently encourage the child to talk about difficult experiences.
Again, as mentioned, we are not suggesting that close-ended questions should never be used or that only open-
ended questions must be used at all times. Both types of questions are valid and should be used. It is about the
purpose of use i.e. what type of information a particular question is trying to elicit—if it is very specific information
about place/time/person, where only one answer is possible, then close-ended questions must be used; but if the
purpose is to detail out and event and understand how a child felt or responded, then open-ended questions are
more useful. The mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider’s skill lies in how to
use the two types of questions, in combination, in an interview with a child, in order to be able to elicit an account
of the abuse event.
356
As discussed earlier, in addition to eliciting a narrative on the immediate abuse, it is also important to understand
the methods and processes used by the perpetrator to sexually abuse the child for mental health professional/
medical professional/ child care service provider to get stronger evidence on all abuse processes and to be able to
prepare for risks of retraction of statement by children. The above questions enable the mental health
professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider to establish the nature of the relationship between
the child and the offender, what interactions they had had even before the actual sexual act took place but which
were used by the offender to lead up to the sexual act.
Some possible ways of exploring and finding out about the grooming process and the dynamics are:
• “Where and how did you meet this person [alleged perpetrator]? How do you know whom/her?”
• “How long have you known this person?”
• “What are some of the activities he/she used to do with you? (incl. the types of games he/she used to play…)”
• “Tell me about any time he/she gave you sweets or toys (or things you liked) …were they given only if you did
something you were asked to?”
• “Has this person ever said anything or done anything that made you feel frightened or uncomfortable?”
“Only answer the question I ask you…nothing more, nothing less. What you are telling me is question number
9 but we are on question number 2 now…” says the judge or the public prosecutor, to the child. The child
then feels too intimidated to reveal further information, for fear that he/she is incorrect or speaking out of
turn. The child may be about to reveal critical information but that is now lost.
Legalistic procedures are often rigidly ordered with public prosecutors and defense lawyers asking questions
in a sequential manner, and expecting their clients to answer accordingly. However, children’s stream of
consciousness is not geared to rigid legalistic thinking and processes. A format with questions to ask
children is always useful, but in child interviewing, we need to be completely flexible. This means allowing
children to tell their story in ways they wish to, rather than conducting the interview as a question-answer
session. This is because children may have urgent things to say, based on what they prioritize in their
minds—this could often be revealing and contain information that is also legally important. Thus, the more
we allow children to sequence their narrative, rather than using rigid legalistic frameworks to sequence their
narratives for them, the greater the chances that we will be able to obtain a coherent narrative of abuse
incidents.
Lastly, many times the interviewer (mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider)
tend to ask children about prior disclosures and reasons for ‘late’ disclosure’ or non-disclosure, in certain
situations. While there is nothing inherently objectionable about these questions on disclosure, it is recommended
that issue of disclosure is avoided during the interview i.e. not ask children whom they have told and why they did
not tell, because children interpret these questions as the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child
care service provider being judgemental and critical. They feel that they are being blamed them for not disclosing;
359
this result is greater fear and anxiety and reluctance to engage further engage or interact, and consequently in an
inaccurate or incomplete statement of abuse.
Sometimes children’s responses may be ambiguous and not as specific as the inquiry requires. Probes refer to
asking follow-up questions, to obtain more detail as and when necessary. However, probes must be used gently,
with the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider waiting for the child to
respond to each question asked.
Use pictures or dolls to assist the child
“I will show you a picture [here is a doll]
…perhaps you can point to where this
person touched or hurt you…” This is
important because children may either
not know the names of body parts, due
their young age and/or inadequate
cognitive skills; or may be hesitant to
mention names of body parts, especially
private parts, given the socio-cultural
taboos that surround these issues. During the eliciting of evidence or the interview, it may therefore be useful to
show pictures of boys/ girls so children can simply point to body parts that were touched or hurt by the
perpetrator. Such pictures are freely available on the internet (see sample above) and simply require to be
downloaded and printed. A doll (from the magic bag) could also instead of pictures. Pictures and dolls are also for
older children, even adolescents, who may be too shy or embarrassed to name private parts.
It is essential to bring the interaction to a close by thanking the child for coming all the way to interact with you-
the mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider. It is also recommended that the
360
mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service provider appreciates the child for providing
the statement. Some possible things that can be said at the end of the interview are as follows:
• “You’ve given me lots of information and that really helps me to understand what happened.”
• “You have told me lots of things today, and I want to thank you for helping me.”
• “I want to especially tell you how brave you are for telling me all that happened…things like this happen to
many children but they don’t always want to tell others about it…because they are afraid. You may also have
been scared but you were brave to tell people about it—I am sure your parents are proud of you…I am too.”
Asking if the child has any further information or thoughts to share is also a useful way to ensuring that nothing
has been missed out during the interview. The mental health professional/ medical professional/ child care service
provider can say:
• “Is there anything else you think I should know?”
• “Is there anything else you want to tell me?”
• “Are there any questions you want to ask me?”
At this stage, one must be prepared for any questions that children may have about how the information
provided by them will be used and/or what will happen to the perpetrator (a question that children commonly
ask). Here is an example of possible responses: “As I said earlier, no is allowed to hurt children or make them
uncomfortable. If anyone does this, there will be actions taken against him/ her. I have noted what you have told me
and this will be shared with people who will take actions against the person you have spoken about. I do not know at
this point what those actions will be—that will be decided later—but I can assure you that they will be actions that
will not allow him/her to hurt you or other children anymore.’
You may notice that this response does not contain words such as ‘punishment’ or state that the ‘perpetrator will
be punished’. This is because where CSA processes have been by known and trusted persons, through processes
of lure and manipulation, children are likely to be in a state of confusion; telling them that the perpetrator is going
to be punished as a result of the child’s report may make a child who is confused and unclear on abuse processes
feel guilty, thereby traumatizing the child further or even leading him/her to retract the at a later stage of legal
procedures.
361
Child-Friendly means Using the Language of Simplicity and the Child’s Terminologies
➢ “Did you intimate your mother after the incident occurred?” can be “Did you tell mummy what
happened after?”
➢ “Did your mother enquire about your whereabouts after the incident? Can be “Did mummy ask
you where you were at the time and after what happened to you?”
➢ “Did he touch you in the vagina?” is “Did he touch you in the pee-pee [or whatever the child calls
this part—find out beforehand what words the child uses for private parts]?” (for a young child)
and “Did he touch you in your private parts?” (for an adolescent)
Remember that you are talking to a 6-year-old (or perhaps a 12- or 16-year-old), not a 40-year-old
person (or one with a qualification in mental health or law)! Think of your childhood...your
children...what terms do you use in your family or household to describe private parts? How do you
communicate with your children at home?
➢ It is critical, however, to document precisely what the child means by ‘pee-pee’ or ‘wee-
wee’—make a note to the effect that ‘the child pointed to the anal/vaginal area, indicating
this as the ‘pee-pee’. Else, the defence lawyers are likely to question your evidence in court
(as no assumptions can be made about what the child meant by the term use, unless that is
clearly verified and documented).
➢ It is always a good idea to state in your reports what language you used to speak with the
child—so that the court is reassured that the child comprehended the questions you placed
to him/her.
362
3-year-olds 15 minutes
10-12-year-olds Up to an hour
This sounds obvious and like the child-sensitive thing to do—even the POCSO Act states that
children should be given frequent breaks. However, in practice, it has been observed that the
pressures of time, the schedules and work-load of judges and other judicial personnel are often
accorded priority and so children are urged to carry on.
‘Just a little longer so that we can finish’ is the plea that is made to children. The danger in this is that
when children are tired or restless and pushed beyond their limit of tolerance, they are likely to be
less cooperative and more suggestible i.e. they more readily acquiesce to any statement or question
that is put to them. Evidence thus elicited is therefore not reliable.
Children with developmental disabilities and psychiatric disorders ranging from attention and
hyperactivity problems to intellectual disability are observed to have poorer attention spans and
lower levels of frustration tolerance. Such children therefore would require more frequent breaks
than others. And if they reach a point when they cannot engage any longer, it would be in the best
interests of the child as well as of the evidence to simply stop and continue at another time.
363
Suggested Reading
▪ Cooper, A., Quas, J. A., & Cleveland, K. C. (2014). The Emotional Child Witness: Effects on juror decision-
making. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 32(6), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2153
▪ Lyon, T. D. (n.d.). New wave in Children’s Suggestibility Research: A critique. Scholarship@Cornell Law: A
Digital Repository. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol84/iss4/3/
▪ Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN’S MEMORY. Annual Review of Psychology,
50(1), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419
▪ Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A
review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506x156620
▪ Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.
Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439.
▪ Hritz, A. C., Royer, C. E., Helm, R. K., Burd, K. A., Ojeda, K., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). Children’s suggestibility
research: Things to know before interviewing a child. Anuario De Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), 3–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2014.09.002
▪ Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing
techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 347–359.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.347
▪ Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in
the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Hypnosis, 42(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207149408409361
▪ Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: a historical review and
synthesis. Psychological bulletin, 113(3), 403.
▪ Lamb, M. E., Malloy, L. C., Hershkowitz, I., & La Rooy, D. (2015). Children and the law. In M. E. Lamb & R. M.
Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 464–
512). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy312
▪ Hritz, A. C., Royer, C. E., Helm, R. K., Burd, K. A., Ojeda, K., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). Children's suggestibility
research: Things to know before interviewing a child. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), 3-12.
▪ Branaman, T. F., & Gottlieb, M. C. (2013). Ethical and legal considerations for treatment of alleged victims:
When does it become witness tampering?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 44(5), 299.
▪ Westcott, H. L., Davies, G. M., & Bull, R. (Eds.). (2003). Children's testimony: A handbook of psychological
research and forensic practice (Vol. 45). John Wiley & Sons.
▪ Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children's memory. Annual review of psychology, 50(1),
419-439.
▪ Gudjonsson, G., Vagni, M., Maiorano, T., & Pajardi, D. (2020). The relationship between trauma symptoms
and immediate and delayed suggestibility in children who have been sexually abused. Journal of
investigative psychology and offender profiling, 17(3), 250-263.
▪ Nicolas, S., Collins, T., Gounden, Y., & Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Natural suggestibility in
children. Consciousness and Cognition: An International Journal.
▪ Curci, A., Bianco, A., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2017). Verbal ability, depression, and anxiety as correlates of
interrogative suggestibility in children exposed to life adversities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(5), 445-458.
▪ Maiorano, T., & Vagni, M. (2020). Coping strategies, immediate and delayed suggestibility among children
and adolescents. Social Sciences, 9(11), 186.
▪ Volpini, L., Melis, M., Petralia, S., & Rosenberg, M. D. (2016). Measuring children's suggestibility in forensic
interviews. Journal of forensic sciences, 61(1), 104-108.
365
Additional Materials
Videos for Evidence Eliciting from Sexually Abused Child Witnesses
366
Concept
Material: Video clip on ‘Stereotyping Child Witnesses’ provided in ‘Additional Matreials’ at the end of
this module.
Process:
• View the video clip.
• Engage in a discussion based on the prompts below.
Discussion:
• Why do you think courts tend to stereotype the child witness?
• What are the implications of such stereotyping?
As Justice Madan B. Lokur, (Former) Judge, Supreme Court of India and (Former) Chairperson, Juvenile Justice and
Child Welfare Committee of the Supreme Court of India in his address highlights, historically, courts have viewed
children as being greatly susceptible to suggestibility and tutoring as they are prone to exaggerate and imagine
things. As a consequence, they have called for greater scrutiny while evaluating child witness testimonies.
In Dharma Dass and Another v. The State 1966 CriLJ 441 a CSA case from pre-POCSO times, children were
observed to be ‘dangerous witnesses’ due to their vulnerability to tutoring:
“…it is absolutely clear that a child witness is always a notoriously dangerous witness, capable of being
tutored..., and therefore unless the possibility of coaching is eliminated and independent corroboration is
available the courts shall be very slow in accepting the solitary testimony of a child witness”.
In the previous sections of this manual, we have discussed key issues related to child witnesses, such as evaluating
witness competency and eliciting evidence (forensic interviewing). In addition to these two key issues, the issue of
credibility is also a key aspect in the appreciation of child witness testimony. As highlighted in much of the case
law on the subject of child witnesses, children are perceived to be inherently unreliable by virtue of their perceived
status limitations i.e., they do not have ‘reliable memory’ and are exceedingly ‘suggestible’. Keeping in this mind,
this chapter will discuss two areas of ambiguity in child witness credibility i.e., suggestibility and tutoring.
367
In a multitude of cases, judicial interpretations have generally prescribed caution while evaluating the competence
of a child witness, and subsequently, while evaluating the credibility/veracity of the child’s testimony. While Section
118 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) stipulates who is competent to testify, there are certain
important aspects that must be considered in regards to the credibility of witness testimony in the context of
children as well. From a judicial point of view, the question of credibility usually relates to certain cognates of a
child’s developmental status in regards to suggestibility, susceptibility to tutoring and likelihood of
misrepresentation. For instance, in the case of Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra (1997) 5 SCC 341, the
Court while reiterating the requirements under Section 118 of the Indian Evidence Act, held that the child witness’
behaviour must be comparable to “any other competent witness” and there must be “no likelihood of being
tutored” i.e., the Court adopted a ‘reasonable adult’ standard in regards to evaluating the competence and
credibility of child witnesses. This poses certain difficulties when seen in light of the existing developmental
research on the child’s ability to be an effective witness.
There is consensus in the available literature on developmental research that behavioural cues and demeanour of
Material: Training video on ‘Myth or Fact? Are Children Reliable Eyewitnesses? By Amanda Gellis and Julie
Joyce’ provided in ‘Additional Matreials’ at the end of this module.
Process:
• View the training video.
• Engage in a discussion based on the prompts below.
Discussion:
• What are the elements of suggestive questioning?
• How does suggestive questioning affect the veracity of the child’s testimony?
• Can the effects of suggestive questioning subsequently be mitigated?
the child are not reliable indicators of the credibility/veracity of the child’s testimony. Yet, perceptions of witness-
demeanour and understandings of normative emotionality play an important role in decision-making on
credibility. Child victims of abuse are expected to be emotional during their testimony. The perception of such
emotionality impacts rendering of favourable verdicts and viewing the child as credible. What is perhaps more
alarming, in this context, is that the prevailing notions of how a ‘reasonable person’ behaves when telling the truth
i.e., clear, cogent and consistent, is fundamentally at odds with research on the point. Often, the witness may
recount certain information in a haphazard manner, on account of the difficulties with recollecting a traumatic
event. Additionally, the witness may not seek to come across as convincing on account of the child’s belief in the
veracity of the allegations.
368
Historically, the most widely cited concern has been the belief that children are inherently more suggestible than
adults, and must therefore, be viewed with scepticism in reported allegations of abuse. One of the most
comprehensive definitions of suggestibility was provided by Thomas D. Lyon in his Cornell Law Review article, The
new wave of suggestibility research: A critique as “the degree to which children’s encoding, storage, retrieval, and
reporting of events can be influenced by a range of social and psychological factors”.
The causal mechanisms for suggestibility can broadly be classified into (a) cognitive factors and (b) social and
motivational factors. Cognitive factors include the manner in which a child’s memory develops w.r.t. an event (the
processes of encoding, storage, retrieval and reporting described above), their linguistic competence, their
semantic, scripted and stereotypical knowledge and their ability to monitor the source of their memories. Social
and motivational factors include the “principle of cooperativity”, which states that listeners interpret speakers’
utterances on the assumption that they are informative, true, relevant and clear. This is because of the social
conventions and context of the interview, where the child is being questioned by an adult.
Material: Dr. Karen Muller on the Reasons for Suggestibility and Factors for Suggestibility
Abstract: This excerpt from Dr. Karen Muller’s seminar on ‘Suggestibility and Tutoring Concerns in Court
Preparation Programs for Child Witnesses’, organised by SAMVAD. Dr. Muller introduces some major
reasons for suggestibility and factors which affect suggestibility among children.
Process:
While research has generally disclosed chronological age to be a significant predictor of suggestibility, there is
considerable evidence to suggest significant variability in proneness to suggestion amongst children of the same
age-group. Individual difference characteristics have been evidenced to have an impact on children’s and adult’s
369
Crucially, suggestibility research today sheds light on the many observable factors and trends that are salient in
discussions of child witness credibility. These trends indicate that proneness to suggestion is not linearly co-
related to chronological age, implying that despite age increases, suggestibility can be a concern. Chief amongst
these trends is the research on ‘reverse developmental trends’ i.e., conditions under which adults and older
children are more prone to suggestion due to an increased likelihood of drawing false inferences. Therefore, issues
pertaining to suggestibility and credibility of child witnesses in the context of CSA requires an evidence-based
approach to facilitate appropriate evidence collection.
i. Suggestive questions
Let’s briefly take a look at these variants of suggestive interviewing techniques, and their consequent impact on
child witnesses. The McMartin Pre-School case is instructive in this regard, wherein seven teachers (several elderly
women) were accused of abusing several hundred children over a 10-year period in Los Angeles. While the
investigation commenced in 1983, the case remained open till the early 90s, and is often cited as one of the most
protracted and expensive trials in California history. Yet, charges against most of the suspects were subsequently
dropped without trial, and more significantly, no convictions were entered into against any of the accused. As
research on the subject has since noted, there were severe discrepancies in the evidence eliciting processes
employed with children in this case, by the social service agency under contract to the prosecutor’s office, with
many contending that therapeutic interviewing techniques were inappropriately utilised in a forensic context
(amongst other major oversights and apparent errors). Keeping in mind the bundle of suggestive interviewing
techniques used in this case, the following is a series of common suggestive techniques and respective examples
from the aforementioned case transcripts:
This technique consists of introducing new information or additional detail into an interview, even though that
information has not already been provided by the child.
Example: "Can you remember the naked pictures?" (when no picture taking or nudity had been mentioned).
370
Example:
(I = Interviewer. C = Child)
I: Ray and Miss Peggy? Did Miss Peggy take her clothes off?
C: Yeah.
I: I bet she looked funny, didn't she? Did she have big boobs?
C: Yeah.
C: Yeah.
In addition to probing for excessive detail that wasn’t central to the abuse inquiry, it is evident from the above
that the interviewer posed close-ended and highly suggestive questions that were central to the allegations of
child sexual abuse, thereby requiring children to simply confirm critical details with a yes/no response.
In this variant, the interviewer informs the child that they have already received information from another person
regarding the topics of the interview. Consider the following:
Example:
“We know about that game [XXXXX] cause we just have had . . . twenty kids told us about that game. ... . Do you
think if I ask you a question, you could put your thinking cap on and you might remember…?”
As is evident from the above, by telling a child about the statements of other people, an interviewer may create
pressures toward conformity i.e., influence the child’s tendency to change or modify one’s own behaviour so that
they are consistent with those of other people. Naturally, this technique could elicit blatantly incorrect responses
from the child, even in the absence of memory distortion.
In this paradigm, the interviewer offers the child positive or negative incentives to answer questions in a particular
manner (i.e., pressure to confirm/deny an allegation). Alternatively, the interviewer may also exert coercion on the
child, through this interview technique, to answer a question despite having no knowledge of the incident,
thereby forcing false positives in certain instances.
❑ Positive Consequences:
This entails the act of giving, promising, or implying praise, approval, agreement, or other rewards to a child or
indicating that the child will demonstrate desirable qualities (e.g., helpfulness, intelligence) by making a
statement. A simple "yes" by an interviewer, indicating that the interviewer has understood the child, would not
be considered Positive Consequences.
371
Example:
(After a series of suggestive questions, one child agreed that a teacher photographed children while they were
naked).
Interviewer response:
"Can I pat you on the head...look at what a good help you can be. You’re going to help all these little children just
because you're so smart."
❑ Negative Consequences
This entails the act of criticizing or disagreeing with a child's statement or otherwise indicating that the
statement is incomplete, inadequate, or disappointing to the interviewer. However, simply repeating the
question cannot be considered to be indicating negative consequences unless surrounding parts of the interview
indicate that the interviewer was being argumentative.
Example:
"Are you going to be stupid, or are you going to be smart and help us here?"
(Interviewer to child's puppet): "Well, what good are you? You must be dumb."
As can be observed from the above examples, the positive/negative consequences technique can be deployed to
much harm, given its coercive quality and exploitation of the power dynamic between the child and adult
interviewer (who is, as far as the child is concerned, an adult in a position of trust and responsibility).
In this technique, the interviewing process entails asking the child a question that she or he has already
unambiguously answered in the immediately preceding portion of the interview. However, repetition of a question
would not be considered asked-and-answered if the interviewer is simply reflecting back he child’s statement,
without trying to elicit a new answer. Given the act of repetition, this technique raises the possibility of
embellishments or contrary statements in subsequent repetitive accounts of the same incident (at the interviewer’s
behest).
Example:
I: Why don't you think about that for a while, okay? Your memory might come back to you.
In light of the above, it is critical to note that children are likely to change their answers in case of a forced choice
question (as above). Forced-choice questions, typically, do not offer a child the choice to provide an answer
through free-recall, since the child is asked to recall the same incident multiple times, thereby giving the child the
distinct impression that they are not recalling the ‘right answer’, and must, therefore, answer differently.
372
Example:
I: What…do you think…[let's] ask Mr. Rags [a puppet]. Maybe he could get his pointer and we configure this out.
C: (unclear, silent)
I: Now, I think this is another one of those tricky games. What do you think, Rags?
C: Yep.
I: Yes. Do you think some of that yucky touching happened, Rags, when she was tied up and she couldn't get away?
Do you think some of that touching that—Mr. Ray might have done some of that touching? Do you think that's
possible! Where do you think he would have touched her? Can you use your pointer and show us where he would
have touched her? [Emphasis added]
Typically, such questions might elicit speculations from children on the basis of what they have heard from other
sources, rather than providing information about what they have personally observed.
In one research study on suggestibility & false reporting in young children, certain important findings were
highlighted, with reference to the impact of persistent, repeated questioning over different periods of time. As
noted in the study, parents helped researchers make a list of two events that had occurred in each child's life and
eight that had not. In weekly sessions, the researchers then reviewed the list with the child, asking for each event,
"Has this ever happened to you?". The following observations were made at regular intervals:
• Week 1: A 4-year-old boy, answered truthfully, "No, I've never been to the hospital," the first time he was
asked if he had ever gone to the hospital because his finger had been caught in a mousetrap.
• Week 11: By week 11, the boy offered an elaborate tale-- about his brother's pushing him into the
mousetrap, near where his father was getting firewood.
The most critical finding in this study was that 56% of children reported at least one false event as true, and some
children reported all the false events as true. An examination of the children's videotaped statements reveals
internal coherent, detailed, yet false, narratives. The most likely causal mechanism for such false assents is source
misattributions, where the child confuses two or more sources of memories, in this case confusing the actual
experience with merely thinking about it.
From the above, it is clear that different types of suggestive techniques affect the child’s ability to recall critical
information related to the sexual abuse incident in different ways. Ultimately, the common issue is one of memory
distortion, and in certain instances, coercion to answer differently.
373
Method: Quiz
Material:
• Can you tell me about what happened once you entered the classroom? (Answer: Not
Suggestible)
• She locked the door and lifted her top, didn’t she? (Answer: Suggestive)
• Why don’t you think about that day clearly, again? You might recall what actually
happened once he locked the door. (Answer: Suggestive)
• Don’t be difficult. Look at how helpful Avinash was while answering our questions. Didn’t
he lock the door and ask you to pull your shorts down? (Answer: Suggestive)
• I understand you can’t recall all of what happened that day. Could you instead tell us
what you think might’ve happened? (Answer: Suggestive)
Process:
• After each statement is read out, participants have to identify whether it is suggestive or
not.
• Last but not the least, participants have to re-state each statement in their suggestive or
non-suggestve form (as the case may be). ). For example, if a statement is suggestive,
participants have to restate the question in its non-suggestive form and vice-versa.
Tutoring, on the other hand, is not the incorporation of false memories, but relates to the external pressures on
the child that may exert a coercive influence on the child’s subsequent testimony. Therefore, in this situation, the
child may be deliberately recalling false narratives, while being cognizant of the truth of the matter. Therefore, in
cases of tutoring, ecological interventions play a central role in ensuring the child is able to safely recall the facts
of the impugned incident without any fear of consequences. These ecological interventions include placement of
the child in a child care institution; ensuring denial of bail to the accused (particularly in cases where the alleged
perpetrator is influential); and, crucially, providing key mental health interventions to counter the myriad impacts
374
of trauma from the sexual abuse. In summary, therefore, tutoring includes situations when children are coached or
told what to say…even pressured or threatened to recall things (that may not even have happened).
Method: Quiz
Material:
● When you/family member tell a child to tell the court something that did NOT happen.
(Answer: Tutoring)
● When you/family member tell a child NOT to tell the court something that did happen.
(Answer: Tutoring)
● When you tell the child exactly what to say i.e. give the child the words to say what was
essentially her experience (even if it happened and is true). (Answer: Tutoring)
● When you read the child’s (164) statement to her, before court deposition, to help her
remember her statement. (Answer: Not Tutoring)
● Ask child to rehearse what she is going to say in court with you providing cues on: ‘who’,
‘place of abuse’ and ‘what happened’. (Answer: Not Tutoring)
Process:
• After each situation is read out, participants have to identify whether it can be called
tutoring or not.
• Participants have to then reason as to why a particular situation does or does not count
as tutoring.
375
Participants are requested to peruse through the case transcript of a cross-examination as detailed
below.
Materials:
Process:
Discussion:
• Let’s look at one exchange from the Child’s Cross-Examination…Why do you think the Court
inferred possible tutoring of the child victim?
• What are your thoughts on the court’s manner of questioning? Does this provide sufficient clarity on
the likelihood of tutoring?
376
What does NOT count as Tutoring…? Some experiences from the NIMHANS Team’s experiences in the
Muzaffarpur Child Abuse and Trafficking Case
During this case, as a part of the court preparation interventions implemented by the NIMHANS Team, children
were provided cues for memory retrieval as a part of court preparation interventions. These included the following
key interventions which were implemented with the implicit understanding that each intervention would have to
be strictly conducted in accordance with evidence-based forensic practises:
● Children were reminded of how the mental health team had elicited accounts of their experiences of abuse in
the child care institution from them some months ago, in the presence of the investigative officers. It was
explained that they now needed to provide these narratives in court. The evidence recorded for each
individual child was then read to her, so as to refresh her memory.
● These processes were implemented twice –a few weeks before the trial, and on the day before children were
due to appear in court for the trial. Children were asked whether there were any other details they
remembered, at that point, in relation to the narrative already provided.
● Open ended questions were posed about details previously provided in their statements, about the
perpetrators (their names), other persons present and possibly aiding and abetting the perpetrators in the act
of abuse, time of day (if the child knew it), the specific space within the institution wherein the abuse took
place and details of the acts of abuse.
377
Suggested Reading
▪ Cooper, A., Quas, J. A., & Cleveland, K. C. (2014). The Emotional Child Witness: Effects on juror decision-
making. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 32(6), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2153.
▪ Lyon, T. D. (n.d.). New wave in Children’s Suggestibility Research: A critique. Scholarship@Cornell Law: A
Digital Repository. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol84/iss4/3/.
▪ Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). THE SUGGESTIBILITY OF CHILDREN’S MEMORY. Annual Review of Psychology,
50(1), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419.
▪ Goodman, G. S., & Melinder, A. (2007). Child witness research and forensic interviews of young children: A
review. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506x156620.
▪ Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis.
Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 403–439.
▪ Hritz, A. C., Royer, C. E., Helm, R. K., Burd, K. A., Ojeda, K., & Ceci, S. J. (2015). Children’s suggestibility
research: Things to know before interviewing a child. Anuario De Psicología Jurídica, 25(1), 3–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apj.2014.09.002.
▪ Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing
techniques from the McMartin Preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 347–359.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.347.
▪ Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in
the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental
Hypnosis, 42(4), 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020714940840936.
378
Additional Materials
Videos for activity on ‘The Court’s Perception of Child Witnesses’
Dr. Karen Muller on the Reasons for Suggestibility and Factors for Suggestibility
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WvgGC0Ta_2w3v4nR3ZVFcsumqeDGFydu/vie
w?usp=sharing
379
Brief facts (disputed)*: The child (aged 6 years) was playing with her two sisters, while her mother was lying
down, as she was unwell. After some time, the children went outside to play. The child reported that the
accused pulled her to his room, while they were outside. The accused’s room was right next to the child’s
room (where her mother was lying down). While inside the accused’s room, the child reported that he pulled
down her underwear, put his saliva on her ‘susu part’ and then inserted his finger. She cried and her mother
came outside. During the child’s testimony, she ‘improved’ her initial account and claimed that the accused
also put his mouth to her ‘susu part’.
‘Material improvements’ in the child victim’s testimony i.e., changes between her initial statement (u/s 164
CrPC) & In-Court examination;
Child’s admission that her mother told her what to say to the Court and Doctor (during medical examination)
Child: It is correct to say that, at home, mamma teaches me and helps me prepare for the exam. When I was
getting ready in the morning, I asked her where she was taking me and why she was taking me there. It is
correct to say that mamma told me what to say in court. It is incorrect to say that, in the hospital also,
mamma told the doctor what happened to me.
Court Question: In the hospital, who told Doctor uncle about the incident?
Child: I told him. Before going to the hospital, I asked mamma where she is taking me and why she is taking
me there.
Court Question: Do you know the difference between ‘where’ and ‘why’?
Child: The meaning of ‘why’ is where are you taking me. Before going to the hospital, mamma told me what to
say to Doctor uncle.
Court Question: What you said to Doctor uncle and what you said today in court…did that happen to you or
did your mamma tell you to say this?
Time
2 hours 20 minutes (Screening - 1 hour 35 minutes; Discussion - 45 minutes)
Material: The movie titled ‘Cries from the Heart’. The movie may be accessed on various OTT platforms.
Synopsis of Film
Michael, a 7-year-old autistic kid who cannot write or communicate, is raised by
his divorced mother, Karen Barth. Following an incident where Michael wanders
off and ends up at the neighbourhood playground, Karen's ex-husband Roger
advises that Michael be placed in a special residential school because he may
require more specialised care than Karen can offer. Karen is initially reluctant to
enrol Michael, but she agrees to go to the campus anyway. There, she meets
with therapist Terry Wilson, who explains how the programme will benefit
Michael. This finally persuades Karen to enrol Michael, even though the school
has mandated that she not return for six weeks. After first objecting to Terry's
methods, Karen reluctantly accepts that the time apart is required for
acclimatisation and accepts a position at a nearby greenhouse. In the
meantime, Michael starts to make slow but steady progress, picking up skills like
tying his own shoes and helping with dinner preparation in the cottage he
shares with his carer, Jeff.
At some point, Terry recommends to Jeff and Eliot, the head of the school, that
they attempt a type of facilitated communication in which Michael types his
ideas on a computer keyboard while Terry holds his hand. While Eliot is
hesitant, Jeff dismisses Michael outright, saying he's "not that bright" and "can't even spell." To test if it works, Eliot
eventually consents to allow Terry a month of one-on-one time with Michael alone. Terry persists even though Michael
first only types gibberish.
Eventually, a breakthrough happens when Karen pays him a visit and, in a tearful moment, he types "MOM HI" to her,
ending his protracted quiet. Michael types "YES" in response to Karen's question about if he knows how much she
loves him, followed by "DAD GONE," which Karen also agrees with. Michael then types "I BRAK CAR MY FALT," which
tells her something she didn't know. This shocks Karen, who says to Michael, "No. No, it's not your fault, honey." Then
she tells Terry that Michael damaged the car glass because he was angry the night she and Roger got divorced. Karen
reassures him that their divorce was more likely the result of their poor communication than the car. She gives Michael
a head kiss after telling him that she and Roger adore him very much.
381
Afterwards, Karen tells Roger about her first chat with Michael, acknowledging that she was mistaken about Terry
before and thanking him for recommending the school. Roger feels guilty for never explaining his departure after
learning that Michael believed he was to blame for the divorce. Karen reassures him that she corrected Michael and
that he may now tell them even if he isn't convinced. Karen even got paid more at the greenhouse, so things appear to
be improving.
But as soon as Jeff leaves for a two-week vacation in Florida, problems start to appear. Michael starts behaving out,
experiencing nightmares, ignoring his responsibilities, and becoming more difficult to manage. Terry, in need of
clarification, asks Michael why, and he responds by typing "JEFF." Terry is taken aback when Michael further explains
this by putting "KEEP JEFF AWAY," since she first believes it has to do with Jeff being away.
When Terry inquires inquisitively, "Keep Jeff away? Michael asks, "Why?" and, based on his agonised countenance,
types down the unimaginable: "SEX"—a reference to being molested. Terry replies, "Oh, my God," in a voice of
astonishment and horror. Informed with this horrible news, an enraged Karen criticizes Terry for letting Jeff hurt
Michael, and demands that she wants Michael immediately, and Eliot and Terry reluctantly agree. Michael walks into
the room during a chat, and Roger and Karen give him a hug. Michael types "I SHAME" at the computer, but Karen
corrects him, telling him he has nothing to be ashamed of and that Jeff was wrong in what he did. Karen insists that
Michael be taken out of the school, claiming that Jeff won't harm him. But Terry objects, claiming that Michael needs
the school or something comparable and that despite Jeff's hurting him, he has come a long way. Furthermore,
according to her, suspending Michael from school would be the same as punishing him for Jeff's abuse of him. "I
STAY" is how Michael also declares his intention to stay there. A detective is sent to the school after Jeff is arrested
and questions Michael about the abuse. Believing Michael to be reliable, the detective remarks to Terry about how
great this method of communication is before departing.
But things aren't going well for Karen. Karen abruptly cuts off all communication, refusing to answer calls or show up for
visits, and isolating herself in the house. Karen feels offended that Michael trusted Terry more than his own mother,
while Roger is thankful that Michael reported the molestation. At last, Terry pays her a visit and tells her that even with
everything the school has taught Michael, he still needs Karen in his life and that their collaboration is crucial. This turns
her around, and as they get ready for trial (a difficult task made worse by the court's unwillingness to allow facilitated
communication in testimony and Jeff's retraction of his confession), Karen emphasises to Terry how crucial it is that she
assist Michael in "finding his voice" in court.
Once he has been shown to be a reliable witness, Michael breezes through the district attorney's questions; then,
under Jeff's attorney's cross-examination, he has a meltdown on the witness stand that compels the court to order a
break. A solution is reached despite the defense's request for a mistrial: Jeff will not be present during another cross-
examination that will take place in a different location and be broadcast back to the courtroom via closed-circuit
television.
Michael types "I CAN DO IT MOM" in response to Karen's question about trying again, and the trial continues. This
time, things proceed more smoothly, and Jeff is ultimately found guilty of having a sexual act on a minor. Michael writes
"WE WON" after receiving Karen's excellent news, to which Karen joyfully responds, "Yes, we did." Michael gives
Karen a hug and a kiss while he plays on the swing. With Terry and Karen watching Michael play on the swing as the
movie comes to a close, Karen remarks, "He is a tough little kid." Terry laughs and says, "I wonder where he got that."
Karen responds, "We'll go together," to Terry's statement that "We have a long way to go with him. Our crew works well
together."
Discussion
What was the most unforgettable moment in the film for you?
● Was there anything about the child’s personality that stood out to you? Does the behaviour of a child have
any impact on the credibility of their communication?
382
● What are your thoughts on facilitated communication, as depicted in the movie? Is it a legitimate and
accurate method of eliciting evidence?
● What are the various ways in which Terry deals with Karen’s overprotective instincts towards Micheal?
● What are the CSA processes through which Jeff sexually abuses Micheal?
● What can be other methods of eliciting evidence from children who suffer from disabilities such as autism
spectrum disorder or speech and learning disability?
383
Learning Objectives
• Develop and implement court preparation interventions in accordance with the specific needs and
vulnerabilities of child witnesses.
• Enable children to be competent witnesses and provide accurate testimony in court.
• Help children to feel empowered and confident, and minimize impact of re-traumatization experienced in
recounting their abuse experiences;
Time
3.5 Hours
Concept
• Legal proceedings can be extremely emotionally stressful for child witnesses--this negative experience
within the justice system, that contributes to the trauma of victims, is described as ‘secondary
victimization’.
• Secondary victimization occurs due to factors such as: victims’ lack of information and knowledge about
their legal rights and criminal processes, which may increase their fears and anxieties, also making them
feel disempowered since they feel that they have no influence on decisions affecting their lives; the
insensitivity of the court and its procedures, due to lack of training, time and personnel, and which results
in disregard of victims’ needs during court processes.
• Children are required to provide a crime narrative multiple times, leading them to repeatedly experience
feelings of fear, guilt and anxiety—and exacerbating the shame and stigma experienced.
• Lack of familiarity with court procedures, the formality of the court room, long waiting times, and frequent
adjournments cause stress and trauma.
• Children are at higher risk of secondary victimization than adults, given their developmental stage; and
more so if they have to see the alleged perpetrator in court—children are afraid of being attacked during
testimony, by the accused, of being blamed or even arrested for ‘making a mistake’, and of not being
believed.
• The experience of cross-examination wherein attempts are made to discredit the child’s testimony, can be
very difficult.
• Such experiences of secondary victimization, resulting from judicial proceedings that are not appropriately
designed and conducted for children, tends to lead to re-traumatization.
• Thus, preparing children for court, so that they know what to expect in the court room, and of court
processes, would help address many of the stresses and anxieties that they would otherwise have—and
that would hinder accurate provision of testimony as well as negatively affect their mental health and
psychosocial well-being.
385
• Given CSA, child witnesses may already be experiencing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder
(PTSD). PTSD symptoms such as recurrent, distressing memories of the event, prolonged psychological
distress at exposure to cues that symbolize or resemble aspect of the traumatic events, and dissociative
reactions are likely, to be worsened by children’s engagement in legal processes.
• They are also likely to negatively impact their abilities to provide testimony--avoidance of efforts to avoid
distressing memories, thoughts and feelings and external reminders associated with the event, and
negative alterations in cognitions and mood, may also manifest in the inability to remember an important
aspect of the traumatic event.
• PTSD is linked to alterations in brain structures and possibly involved in attention, encoding and
consolidation of memory. During a traumatic event, the attention remains focused on the main stressor
and therefore it is remembered particularly well. Thus, while some children with severe trauma,
remembering the core features of the event quite well, others retrieve information in a generic form
(without remembering the specifics) - as a means of controlling negative affect associated with the
memory.
• Thus, (unresolved) trauma can also impact survivor testimony and, thus, the efficiency and credibility of the
judicial proceedings. There is, consequently a need to assist children with their trauma issue, of course first
and foremost with the objective of ensuring their healing and recovery, but also as part of court
preparation—so that children are better able to regulate their emotions whilst in court and providing
distressing abuse narratives.
• The adversarial system requires children to provide court testimony in ways that need for them to convert
their memories into words and sentences. This communication is to be made within the limitations of a
question-answer structure i.e. the child witness must respond precisely to the each of the questions put by
the court, in whatever manner or sequence the court decides to put them.
• Given the court’s use of ‘legalese’ and their tendency to ask semantically and syntactically complex
questions, phrased in ways that are beyond children’s levels of understanding, the latter are often unable
to comprehend and communicate with the court. This leads to unreliable reports from children.
• There is the particular concern of cross-examination—wherein children’s developmental abilities, and how
they are pitted, in what is a completely unequal playing field, against a lawyer who is attempting to
discredit their narrative. Court preparation helps children to understand (at least to some extent), the ways
of cross-examination, and the use of certain skills and techniques to be able to respond to cross-
examination. For example, children may be prepared for some questions may be a deliberate attempt by
the defence lawyers, to provoke an angry or agitated reaction and that remaining composed is critical to
providing accurate responses.
386
• Thus, the limitations of children’s communication abilities, which hinder the obtaining reliable testimony,
may be minimized by instructions or preparation of child witnesses.
o Identify how a given mental health issue may impact child’s ability to provide testimony in court.
Refer to Table 1 for an example of how competency assessments may be analysed to provide the requisite court
preparation interventions to a given child. The example provided in the table is drawn from SAMVAD’s experience
of preparing a group of children who were sexually abused in the child care institution where they were residing
for some years. Multiple numbers of children (ranging between ages 11 and 18 years) were abused, and since the
children shared a space, they had knowledge of not only their own experiences but also of others as they had
witnessed incidents of abuse. Each child had suffered multiple episodes of abuse, by multiple abusers (by known
persons such as the staff and also unknown persons from outside the institution), over relatively long time-frames
(about 2 to 4 years).
While the institutional context was the same for all children, they each had varying experiences of complex and
chronic deprivation, abuse and trauma, both within and prior to their entering the institution. Their life
experiences, due to CSA as well as other traumatic events, manifested in various emotional and behaviour
problems and mental health problems ranging from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mood disorders,
anxiety, self-harm, withdrawal and other forms of emotional dysregulation to aggression and oppositional
behaviour. The children also had varying levels limitations in their cognitive capacities, either due to
developmental disabilities, and/or due to lack of stimulation and developmental opportunities and the impact of
trauma. In this backdrop, they were therefore were expected to recount multiple experiences of abuse as part of
the testimony—and according to which the SAMVAD team had devised court preparation interventions, some
universal, and others individually geared to cater to specific child witness needs and abilities.
In recognition of the challenges child witnesses have in providing testimony, countries such as
Canada and the United Kingdom developed some of the earliest programs and packages
available for preparation of the child witness.
For more information on child witness preparation and training programs, you may refer to the
following programs and websites:
• Child Witness Project, Canada
https://www.lfcc.on.ca/services/adolescent-services-2/child-witness-project/
• Canadian Child Abuse Association
https://www.childcourtprep.com/training_courtprep.html
• Kids and Teens in Court (KTIC): A Model for Preparing Child Witnesses for Court
https://www.chadwickcenter.org/kids-and-teens-in-court/
• Child Witness Institute, South Africa
https://childwitness.net/the-child-witness-institute/
• Child Witness Pack
https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/child-witness-pack-evaluation
388
The use of videos and cartoons to help children understand the geographies and processes in
court, and to alleviate their fears and anxieties about going to court…
• ‘Kids in Court’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EswF5p41Sfs
• ‘Radiant Goes to Court’
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcJKOiGmKQY
Finally, based on our understanding of child witnesses’ challenges with regard to testifying in
court, here are some recommendations on what support persons accompanying children to
court need to be doing:
• Accompany the child (and family) to court…help them navigate the system.
• Talk to public prosecutor…inform him/her what child may need in terms of breaks etc
depending on age and ability.
• Ensure child gets water, food…breaks during the session.
• Be alert to the child’s emotional states…and request court for break accordingly.
• Remind child to use relaxation and self-soothing exercises if she feels distressed…and to
think of the objects of courage/comfort.
• Validate child’s emotions of anger and distress after the hearing i.e. do a de-briefing
session.
• Tell child she did exceedingly well…that she was very brave.
• Never criticize child for not providing (adequate) testimony!
389
Table: An Example of Children’s Developmental and Mental Health Concerns: Implications for Capacity to Provide Testimony and Preparation
for Court (as implemented by the SAMVAD team in the context of sexually abused children in a child care institution)
Category of Children Developmental and Implications for Capacity to Implications for Court
Mental Health Concerns Provide Testimony Preparations
Children with socio- • Drawn from backgrounds of chronic neglect, • High ability to provide valid and • Eliciting children’s fears and
emotional skill deficits: without adequate nurturance and reliable (abuse) narratives and confusions about court
developmental opportunities at home and evidence but with a focus on testimony and related issues,
subsequently, at the institution. external events and occurrences including abuse experiences.
• Institutionalized at relatively young ages, rather than linked to self. • Introducing ideas of courage
when identities were at a formative stage. • Ability to provide adequate and determination to
• Consequently, did not develop age- amounts of information regarding encourage overcoming of
appropriate socio-emotional skills, despite events /occurrences in the fears.
having average age-appropriate intellectual/ institution, and on physical abuse, • Discussion on the benefits of
cognitive capacities. but reluctant to provide providing accurate testimony
• Significant socio-emotional communication information regarding (traumatic) • Universalization of their
difficulties either due to social skills deficits experiences of the self, particularly abuse experiences to
and disorders of social anxiety, causing of sexual abuse. ‘normalize’ them and thus
reluctance to engage with new persons. enable them to provide
details about the self.
389
390
Children with near- • Drawn from backgrounds of chronic neglect • High ability to provide valid and • Acknowledgement of anxiety
normal socio-emotional but had near-normal social and emotional reliable (abuse) narratives and and PTSD-related emotions
skills: development (possibly explained by evidence both about external that arise while talking about
resilience). events/ occurrences as well as traumatic experiences.
• Institutionalized at a relatively older age, experiences of the self, pertaining • Highlighting their courage to
i.e.mid-late adolescence, when identities were to sexual abuse. talk about difficult
better developed. • Ability to engage socially, and experiences.
• Developed mental health issues such as provide details about difficult • Enhancing emotional-
PTSD, depression, adjustment disorder and experiences. regulation abilities, through
emotional regulation issues in the institution, • Presence of risk/ tendency to be training in anger and anxiety
due to experiences of abuse and trauma. overwhelmed by PTSD symptoms management techniques.
interrupt the abuse narrative.
Children with Below • Cognitive capacities below age-appropriate • Ability to provide valid and • Encouragement to provide
Average Intelligence— levels. reliable (abuse) narratives and abuse narratives through
Mild Intellectual • Independent in day-to-day functioning and evidence both about external appreciation of their courage
Disability: self-help skills. events/ occurrences as well as in the wake of difficult
• Speech and communication abilities present experiences of the self. experiences.
but more complex physical aspects of sexual • Difficulty with advanced reasoning • Use of communication aids
experiences hard for them to explain. and higher-order perspective, (anatomical dolls) to facilitate
• Difficulty with memory, sequencing and leading them to be less inhibited; communication.
details of events. therefore, less likely to withhold • Greater need to refresh
information—consequently able memory, and for rehearsal of
to share narratives more openly. narrative, to maintain some
consistency in sequence and
detail.
390
391
Materials:
Court preparation interventions hand-outs (developed by SAMVAD in the above
discussed example). Hand-outs for this activity are provided as ‘Additional Material’ at
the end of this module.
Process:
• Divide the participants into 4 sub-groups (if is a large group, you may divide them
into 8 sub-groups, with two sub-groups working on the same hand-out).
o Each hand-out (as you see), has a table, with a column that is titled
‘Interventions’ and one that is titled ‘Descriptions’. The ‘Interventions’ are
the broad processes of what is done with the child; and the descriptions
provide details of these processes.
• When all sub-groups have done the exercise, have each of them present their
sub-titles/ titles in plenary.
Discussion:
*After the participants have had a chance to respond, share possible sub-heads and
overall titles as below.
392
Possible Responses to Activity on Implementing Court Preparation Interventions for Child Witnesses
393
394
395
396
Suggested Readings
▪ Ramaswamy, S., Devgun, M., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2023). “When an Elephant has its foot on the
tail of a mouse…” Trauma-Focused Court Preparation Interventions for Sexually Abused Child Witnesses.
Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 31(2), 403-443.
▪ Ramaswamy, S., Devgun, M., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2023). “The Child Needs to Tell it to Me in
Words”: Barriers and Facilitators to Witness Competencies in Child Sexual Abuse Trials. The International
Journal of Children's Rights, 31(2), 403-443.
▪ Saywitz, K., Jaenicke, C., & Camparo, L. (1990). Children's knowledge of legal terminology. Law and Human
Behaviour, 14(6), 523-535.
▪ Block, S. D., Oran, H., Oran, D., Baumrind, N., & Goodman, G. S. (2010). Abused and neglected children in
court: Knowledge and attitudes. Child abuse & neglect, 34(9), 659-670.
▪ Back, C., Gustafsson, P. A., Larsson, I., & Berterö, C. (2011). Managing the legal proceedings: An
interpretative phenomenological analysis of sexually abused children's experience with the legal
process. Child abuse & neglect, 35(1), 50-57.
▪ Flin, R. H., Stevenson, Y., & Davies, G. M. (1989). Children's knowledge of court proceedings. British Journal
of Psychology, 80(3), 285-297.
▪ Nathanson, R., & Saywitz, K. J. (2015). Preparing children for court: Effects of a model court education
program on children's anticipatory anxiety. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 33(4), 459-475.
▪ Eltringham, S., & Aldridge, J. (2000). The extent of children's knowledge of court as estimated by guardians
ad litem. Child Abuse Review, 9(4), 275-286.
▪ Crawford, E., & Bull, R. (2006). Teenagers’ difficulties with key words regarding the criminal court
process. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(6), 653-667.
▪ Muller, K. (2000). The effect of the accusatorial system on the child witness. Child abuse research in South
Africa, 1(2), 13-23.
▪ Elmi, M. H., Daignault, I. V., & Hébert, M. (2018). Child sexual abuse victims as witnesses: The influence of
testifying on their recovery. Child Abuse & Neglect, 86, 22-32.
▪ Ghetti, S., Alexander, K. W., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). Legal involvement in child sexual abuse cases:
Consequences and interventions. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 25(3), 235-251.
▪ Quas, J. A., Wallin, A. R., Horwitz, B., Davis, E., & Lyon, T. D. (2009). Maltreated children's understanding of
and emotional reactions to dependency court involvement. Behavioural Sciences & the Law, 27(1), 97-117.
▪ Nathanson, R., & Saywitz, K. J. (2003). The effects of the courtroom context on children's memory and
anxiety. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 31(1), 67-98.
▪ Claasen, L. T., & Spies, G. M. (2017). The voice of the child: experiences of children, in middle childhood,
regarding children's court procedures. Social Work, 53(1), 74-95.
397
Additional Material
Videos for viewing and discussion during the session on ‘Innovative ways to prepare children for court…’
Court preparation intervention hand-outs for the Activity: ‘Implementing Court Preparation Interventions for
Child Witnesses’ is provided on the next page in a printable format for your use.
398
Materials for the activity on ‘Implementing Court Preparation Interventions for Child Witnesses’
Interventions Description
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ (Re)assessment of children’s mental health status
▪ (Re) Calibration of psychiatric medication adjusted to balance side effects that
might influence the child’s capacity/ability to provide testimony.
▪ Persuasion of children to adhere to medication regimes
▪ Teaching of emotional regulation techniques, namely for self-soothing and
relaxation, in accordance with individual child needs.
▪ Reminders to use emotional regulation techniques before and during the court
deposition processes in case children felt overwhelmed by resurgence of traumatic
memories.
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Helping children internalize ideas of the notion of justice, and the nature of
injustice; this was done through group discussions, using simple daily life examples and
situations such as, “It is fair if a big strong adult hits and badly injures a small child—is that
fair? Or if a person breaks into someone’s house and steals their valuable stuff, is it fair to
the person who lost everything?”
▪ Film screening (of children’s films) and perspective-taking methods implemented
to reiterate ideas of courage, motivation and problem-solving in the wake of individual
fears and difficulties.
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Children told that sometimes the defence lawyers might suggest that the child
witness is ‘telling lies’ or ‘saying things that never happened’.
▪ As the children were observed to be angry even as they were made aware of this
possibility:
o Their anger was validated--by acknowledging that everyone feels angry when they
have suffered abuse or injustice and when are not believed.
o How it might be more useful to respond calmly and strongly in court, to say, for
example, ‘I am not lying. It really happened.’
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Provision of information to children about the child sexual abuse law and its
provisions on confidentiality i.e. that no child’s identity could be disclosed and that the
media was not permitted to print or disclose in any manner the child’s name, address,
family details or photographs.
▪ Children reassured that:
o There would be police (and others) in court for children’s protection.
o they would not meet the perpetrators in person (only identify them on a TV
screen) because the perpetrators, accompanied by the police, would use a separate
entrance to the court.
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Discussions with children, particularly adolescents, on their right to (reclamation of)
personhood and affirmative sexuality.
▪ Enabling children to understand (child) sexual abuse as a criminal issue, not a
matter of honour: “When people hurt and injure us, it is a criminal act…against the law.
How can the person who got hurt (i.e. the victim) become the bad person…why should she
399
lose respect…?”
▪ Helping children develop a viewpoint that ‘honour’ and ‘self-respect’ are
intangibles that ‘lie in our hearts and minds’ and so, ‘how no one can touch or take those
away from us’.
Description
▪ Children were reminded about the time period when evidence was gathered and
(SUB-TITLE?) the need to provide those narratives in court was explained to them.
▪ Evidence recorded for each child was read to her. This was done twice – a few
weeks before the trial and a day before the child had to depose in court.
▪ Child was asked whether she remembered any new information in relation to the
already provided narrative.
▪ Non-leading memory retrieval cues were provided to recall key aspects of their
narratives.
▪ Open-ended questions were posed about details given in the statements
(related to people who perpetrated, other people present who possible aided
and abetted, time of day, location where the abuse took place, details of the acts
of abuse).
400
Description
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Discussion on how children would respond to possible questions put by court,
such as ‘what happened in the child care institution?’
▪ Suggestions provided to children that they:
o Respond through eye witness accounts (for example, of witnessing another child
being abused);
o Respond through accounts of personal experience (acts done to them by the
perpetrators).
o Avoid stating things they had heard since hearsay can be inaccurate (the judge
might say ‘how do you know it actually happened if you did not see or
experience it?’) and not make for as strong evidence.
(SUB-TITLE?) ▪ Examples of how questions may not be asked in a logically sequential manner,
and how there may be frequent interruptions by the lawyers (with sub-questions
and clarifications) discussed with children.
401
● To get an overview of the different types of evidence and their meanings in the context of the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872.
Time
2 Hours
Concept
As medical and mental health professionals providing assistance in child sexual cases, key areas of work relate to:
• Providing the court with reports on the child’s capacity for testimony.
Therefore, the need to understand what evidence is, what types of evidence are admissible in court & how
children may be assisted is central to facilitating greater convergence between the mental health and legal
domains in cases of child sexual abuse.
Understanding Evidence
Broadly speaking, in general parlance, anything that supports a claim or proposition may be considered to be
evidence of that claim. Consequently, “proof” is a body of evidence that conclusively proves something is true,
and typically, includes different kinds of evidence.
The Law of Evidence in India is governed by the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. These evidence rules provide a
framework to identify and prove certain facts through different pieces of information, in order to sufficiently
prove/disprove a claim in courts of justice. This is the adversarial system of Justice.
From an evidentiary standpoint, a preliminary question that needs to be answered prior to the judicial process of
evaluating and ‘appreciating’ the quality of evidence presented in Court, is that of ‘admissibility’ of evidence. In
accordance with the law, there are stipulations as to what kind of evidence is “admissible” i.e., whether it can be
403
presented to the Court as legal evidence. Following a judicial determination of whether the concerned evidence is
admissible, the court can proceed with appreciation of evidence i.e., the judicial process of analysing and
evaluating the value, quality and worth of evidence.
“Fact” refers to anything (incl. the state/relation of things) which can be perceived by the senses. It may also refer
to any state of mind that a person is aware of. For example: you are currently looking at a screen and hearing me
say this sentence. This is a fact.
Facts in issue: Any ‘fact’ which by itself, or in connection with other facts shows the existence or non-existence,
the nature or extent of any matter which is asserted or denied in the proceedings before the Court. Let’s consider
the following example:
Amit is accused of stealing Brijesh’s bag. At the trial, the facts which are in issue can include:
ii) That Amit took away the bag without Brijesh’s knowledge or consent;
iii) That Amit intended to take Brijesh’s bag for himself, knowing that it belonged to Brijesh;
iv) That Amit mistakenly believed that the bag was his own.
Relevant facts are those which are connected to each other i.e., they support or influence other facts. Proving a
relevant fact may be relevant to answering the main issue in question. Typically, evidence relating to a series of
relevant facts ultimately paint a story that is sufficient to prove the main disputed issue i.e., the fact in issue. In the
above example, consider that Amit was in a different city on the day that Brijesh’s bag was stolen. Therefore, while
Amit’s location in a different city is not in and of itself the disputed issue in the case, it nonetheless is critical
information since it proves a relevant fact: Amit was not present at the location where Brijesh’s bag was stolen at
the time of the offence.
In light of the above, there are broadly two types of evidence that are admissible in court: a) evidence of facts in
issue and relevant facts; b) facts which form part of the same transaction.
● Let’s take an example of a fact that ‘forms part of the same transaction’: Amit is accused of murdering
Brijesh in the course of a fight. Whatever Amit and Brijesh said before the fight began, or during the fight, form
part of the same transaction.
● Let’s consider another example: Aisha sues Brijesh for sexual harassing her through emails. Prior emails
exchanged between them, which form part of their communication, even though not directly related to the sexual
harassment allegations, are relevant facts.
What are some common kinds of relevant facts that are admissible?
1. Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue, or facts which afforded an opportunity
for their occurrence, are relevant as evidence.
404
Examples:
a) It is alleged that A sexually abused B. The fact that A was aware of B’s schedule and when B was alone, that
B had marks on their body or was distressed in the days following the incident, are all relevant facts.
b) The case is that A robbed B with the use of a knife. The fact that A had bought a knife that day, and was
spotted following B a few days earlier, are relevant facts.
2. Facts which are indicative of motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conduct
Any fact which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any fact in issue or relevant fact. The conduct of any
party is relevant if it influences or is influenced by other relevant facts. It is irrelevant if the relevant fact took place
before or after.
Example
a) Brijesh says that he saw Amit buying sedatives from a medical store, before the alleged rape occurred,
wherein it was reported that the child was drugged prior to the assault. This is relevant as it shows preparation and
Brijesh’s conduct prior to the incident.
Note: In CSA cases, evidence about grooming can be brought as evidence to indicate preparation for the abuse
incident/s. These processes will have to be brought to the notice of the police and to the Court.
Any fact which shows the existence of a state of mind, intention, knowledge, good faith, ill will towards a particular
person, or the existence of any state of body or bodily feeling are relevant as evidence. Behaviour of the abuser,
grooming processes used with the child, can all indicate the existence of the intention and ill will of the
accused. Further, evidence about fear, confusion, hesitancy, can be brought to the notice of the Court to explain
delayed disclosures by the child.
One particularly significant classification here, is with respect to oral and documentary evidence. Oral evidence is
accorded primary significance under the law, in terms of evidentiary value, making it imperative that all witnesses
are assisted sufficiently in order to be able to provide testimony where possible. Broadly, they can be defined as
follows:
● Documentary evidence – All documents which are brought before the Court, including electronic
documents. Documentary evidence may be primary - showing original documents, or secondary, which is
producing copies of documents (permitted under certain circumstances).
● Oral Evidence - Statements which are made before the Court by witnesses in relation to the facts in
dispute. In most cases, oral evidence must be primary or direct, which means that the witness who has personally
seen, heard or perceived the fact must give their evidence before the Court. Oral evidence is collected primarily
during:
405
a) examination-in-chief
b) cross examination &
c) re-examination.
Table: Process of recording witness testimony (oral evidence) in Court through examination-in-chief, cross-
examination and re-examination.
The examination of witness by The examination of a witness by The examination of a witness, after the
the party who calls him the adverse party cross-examination, by the party who
initially called him
First in the order of witness Second in the order of witness Last in the order of witness
examination examination examination
● Direct Evidence directly proves or disproves a fact. Direct evidence relates to the very issue in question,
and can prove the fact in question without any corroboration. (for e.g.: Eyewitness Testimony)
● Indirect Evidence proves facts in question by proving other facts which are related to the main issue in
dispute. A deduction must be drawn from the evidence by linking it with the claims/allegations made. Indirect
Evidence includes: a) hearsay evidence; and b) circumstantial evidence
Circumstantial evidence does not prove the issue in question but it establishes the point through inference or
reasoning. When there is insufficient direct evidence to prove any fact in issue then the court evaluates the
availability of existing evidence and construct a link between the existing evidence and inference to be drawn from
the same. Typically, circumstantial evidence requires a chain of circumstances to establish a clear line of events
which may ‘reasonably’ point to a factual conclusion. If there are serious breaks in the chain, circumstantial
evidence will not be able to satisfy the court’s evidentiary requirement. For example: At the time of the rape, the
406
accused was seen going to the victim’s house, and shortly afterwards, screams were heard from the victim’s house.
This is circumstantial evidence.
Hearsay Evidence refers to when a person narrates facts which were told to them by the actual witness of the
incident. The witness before the Court is reporting not what they themselves saw or heard, but facts which relayed
to them. It is typically considered weak evidence, or no evidence at all (in most instances).
Substantive evidence is the evidence on the basis of which a fact is proved and which requires no corroboration.
(E.g.: Eyewitness Testimony) Corroborative evidence is the evidence used to support substantive evidence, and
therefore, cannot in and of itself prove a fact. If there is no substantive evidence, corroborative evidence loses its
significance. (E.g.: Medical Evidence) Both these evidences are either direct or circumstantial or both i.e., these
concepts are fundamentally interrelated but distinct.
Material:
Illustration: - Amit is charged under POCSO for the penetrative sexual assault of Brijesh (a 9 year-old boy).
Chetan, Dinesh, Ehsaan, and Farooq are witnesses called by the prosecution.
1. Chetan says that he saw Amit forcibly remove Brijesh’s shorts in his shop, which is near Brijesh’s
school. (His evidence is purely direct and substantive since he is an eye witness.)
2. Dinesh says that he heard Brijesh cry out that Amit was hurting him. (His evidence is direct and
corroborative, as he did not actually witness the incident of assault, but heard Amit’s cries for help. His
evidence, in and of itself might raise more questions than answers. However, Dinesh’s testimony could be
vital corroborative evidence to Brijesh’s testimony.)
3. Ehsaan says that he saw Amit running away from the shop, with his pants unzipped and shirt
untucked, after people started gathering outside his shop. (His evidence is circumstantial as he did not
witness the events leading to state of A’s clothes & physical appearance.)
4. Farooq says that he saw Amit burning his clothes shortly after running away. (Evidence of Farooq is
essentially circumstantial.)
Discussion: This activity requires that all participants evaluate the different examples provided below and
identify which type of evidence these examples may constitute and provide reasons for the same. Each
example may also include more than one type of evidence. For example, a piece of evidence may be
direct, but also corroborative evidence. The remarks within brackets are for the reference of the facilitator
and may be shared with the group during discussion of the examples.
Only 57.9% of cases were evaluated as credible, and the most powerful predictors of credibility were determined
to be older age and absence of cognitive delay. The remaining 42.1% cases did not just consist of cases wherein
the truthfulness of the reports was doubted, but also cases wherein the evidence was found to be insufficient.
Given the small proportion of suspected false reports, it was concluded that the justice system was likely to
dispose of nearly a third of truthful cases. These realities raise certain important questions in regards to the
methods of collection of evidence during child sexual abuse trials. While there have been no studies with a
similarly large sample in the Indian context, the low conviction rates and challenges faced in trials of POCSO cases
make it increasingly likely that many genuine reports of CSA are incorrectly disposed of. Given the adverse
consequences of ineffective mechanisms for evidence collection on child protection in the country, there is a
pressing need for greater reflection on issues affecting the prosecution of CSA cases in India despite the existence
of the POCSO Act.
Indeed, while there are developmental differences between adults’ and children’s memory, it is to be noted that
children also have the ability to provide accurate and meaningful information. For example, the ability to narrate
past events, may be loosely organized according to children’s developmentally immature views of the world. This
does not imply that the child cannot sequence and describe abuse events. Instead, it emphasises the role of the
forensic interviewer in using child-sensitive methods of forensic interviewing, which may utilise the child’s sense of
time and sequence in order to optimise the information collected from the child. For example, the interviewer may
not get very far if they ask a young child about what happened at 9:00 am on the day of the incident. Nonetheless,
the interviewer is likely to be more successful if they enquire from the child what happened after the school bus
dropped the child off at school. This is a technique often used in child forensic interviews, and establishes the
importance of questioning methods on the quality of the child’s testimony.
Additionally, in the context of legalese in the court context, common courtroom questions may be misunderstood
by children, especially given their developmental immaturity. When children are asked questions they cannot
understand, miscommunication is inevitable. Therefore, there is an imperative to relax some of the strict rules of
admissibility and appreciation of evidence of child witnesses, given that these rules have been developed in the
context of the ‘reasonable adult’ standard, and are required to accommodate the child’s characteristics in order to
facilitate the creation of a more just ‘reasonable child standard’.
Material:
Rinku v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2019 (Transcript of the child victim’s cross-examination)
Q. You had earlier told your mother it was a tall boy who lives in your area?
Ans. Yes.
Q. Did you tell mummy that Jaanu's uncle took you to the forest?
Ans. Yes. I told her.
Q. Beta, did the police come to meet you in the hospital?
Ans. Yes.
Q. When did they come to meet you…same day or next day?
(Question disallowed considering the age of victim)
Q. Was mummy in the hospital with you all night that day?
Ans. Yes.
Q. Do you know any girl by the name N?
408
Ans. No.
Q. Do you know any girl by the name Z?
Ans. No.
Q. Beta, did your mummy ask you to say what you said in court today?
Ans. Yes.
Court question: Beta, whatever you have said today happened to you or are you saying it at the
behest of your mother?
Ans. It happened to me."
Process: To provide this excerpt from a POCSO Trial and discuss the role played by the Judge in
ensuring a child-oriented approach to cross-examination and how the Judge tackles the issue of
tutoring.
Discussion:
• What was the role of the Presiding Officer/Judge in this cross-examination? Were the Judge’s
interventions in line with their role under the POCSO Act?
• How did the Judge’s interventions affect the nature of questioning? Were these interventions
restricted to relaying questions from the defence?
• Did the Judge’s questions affect the perceived credibility of the child witness?
• In the absence of the judge’s interventions, what do you think would be the impact of this cross-
examination on the appreciation of evidence?
In a multitude of cases, judicial interpretations have generally prescribed caution while evaluating the competence
of a child witness, and subsequently, while evaluating the credibility/veracity of the child’s testimony. Sec.118 of
the Evidence Act states that a child is also competent to give evidence and the evidence of a child is admissible.
Therefore, a young child can be allowed to testify if he or she has the capacity to understand questions and give
rational answers thereto. The only caution to the court is that the evidence of a child must be scrutinized with care
and caution, and where possible, be supported by corroboratory evidence. Therefore, while case law has
established that even the sole testimony of a child witness can be the basis of conviction, in the absence of any
corroborative evidence, the child’s testimony is legally viewed with circumspection (due to concerns of
suggestibility or tutoring). Therefore, in actual practice, children’s statements are viewed with a great degree of
uncertainty, especially in the absence of corroborative evidence, owing to the innate developmental limitations of
child witnesses.
Section 6 read with Section 157 of the Evidence Act allows for admission of hearsay evidence, as corroborative
evidence, subject to certain conditions of contemporaneity and spontaneity of disclosure. Certain kinds of
statements may be made naturally, spontaneously, and without deliberation soon after an incident. They typically
do not leave much room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation, when someone else hears them, and hence
carry a high degree of credibility. Hearsay evidence includes:
1. Words or phrases that either form part of, or explain, a physical act,
The hearsay exception is of special significance in child sexual abuse cases as the child victim-witness, in many
cases, discloses abuse to the parent/caregiver after the incident. The testimony of the parents or caregivers is
hence vital corroborative evidence, especially in the absence of physical or medical evidence.
There are, however, certain issues with the exception in regards to its implementation in different contexts.
Multiple decisions of various courts have held that the disclosure must be “contemporaneous” with the offence
committed for it to be considered valid res gestae evidence. The logic behind this requirement is that the hearsay
exception must only extend to those disclosures that are “spontaneous utterances” and not statements made after
there is an opportunity to reflect and fabricate. When seen in the context of sexual offences committed against
children, this logic is not commensurate with the available research on child development. (Jee, 1997) (Raeder,
2007) Depending on the stage of the child’s sexual development, the child may have vastly different responses to
an incident of abuse. Unlike an adult, a child cannot be “reasonably” expected to react to the incident with
comparable indignation. If the attendant circumstances of the abuse involve sustained CSA by a known individual,
disclosure is further complicated. Therefore, the hearsay exception in cases of CSA will need to adopt a more
comprehensive understanding of “contemporaneity” to adequately include instances of res gestae evidence that
are not marred by “reasoned reflection”.
The case of State of T.N v. Suresh and Anr. is interesting in this context. In this case, the test of contemporaneity
was broadly applied. The Court noted that there was no hard and fast rule in regards to spontaneity of disclosure.
The only requirement stipulated in the aforementioned case is in regards to whether or not the victim had the
opportunity to concoct or be tutored.
“In cases of this nature, we cannot expect any eye witness or independent witness… It is settled proposition of law
that when the evidence of prosecutrix (child) is cogent, consistent and trustworthy and inspires confidence of the
Court, conviction can be recorded solely based on the evidence of the victim, unless there is a reason to discard or
disbelieve the evidence of the sole witness” - K Ruban v. State (Madras HC 2021).
“Consistency” of statements and evidence is one of the primary requirements for a conviction in a criminal trial.
However, in light of their developmental limitations, children may be inconsistent, which is usually not because of
any ‘deliberate falsehood’ or attempt to mislead the court. Inconsistency may be caused by numerous factors,
including:
2) developmental immaturity.
Inconsistencies in child witness testimony call into question the reliability of the testimony, and in some cases, the
credibility of the witness itself. Typically, inconsistencies in the child’s testimony may be an indicator of the
possibility of tutoring, thereby requiring the Court to consider further evidence, or in some cases, acquit the
accused altogether.
Let’s look at what the Bombay High Court said in the case of Ali Mohammed Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
(Bombay HC 2020):
"The testimony of the victim so far as the identity of the accused is concerned, appears to be inconsistent. When
the evidence of the Prosecution Witness — 5 was recorded in the Chamber of the learned Judge, the appellant
(accused) was shown to her and she identified him in the Court saying that he is a friend of her father. The
victim then deposed that she did not see the person prior to the date of offence committed on her, but then
goes on to say that he used to meet her father and that she knew him well. It is in her evidence that she had an
occasion to see the appellant again since the day she was assaulted. Considering these inconsistencies in her
evidence, the version of the victim has to be scrutinized carefully.”
As child was the sole witness in this case, the accused was acquitted by the High Court. If we analyse this case, it is
evident that the accused was acquitted not simply by virtue of the inconsistency, but rather, owing to the nature of
the inconsistency. The identity of the perpetrator in any case of sexual abuse is a fact in issue. Therefore,
inconsistency on this point will typically be fatal to the prosecution of the case.
In light of the above, case law has recognised that inconsistency, in itself, is not sufficient reason to discredit a
witness. The question is with regard to the extent of omission/discrepancy in the child’s testimony. If it is a minor
inconsistency, it does not affect the reliability of the evidence. Only inconsistency in material particulars i.e., key
aspects of the testimonial account (as mentioned above), would require greater scrutiny.
411
“Only such omissions which amount to contradiction in material particulars can be used to discredit the
testimony of the witness. The omission in the police statement by itself would not necessarily render the
testimony of witness unreliable. When the version given by the witness in the court is different in
material particulars from that disclosed in his earlier statements, the case of the prosecution becomes
doubtful and not otherwise. Minor contradictions are bound to appear in the statements of truthful
witnesses as memory sometimes plays false and the sense of observation differ from person to person…Even
if there is contradiction of statement of a witness on any material point, that is no ground to reject the
whole of the testimony of such witness.”
“…mere insertion of sections 29 and 30(2) in the POCSO does not altogether relieve the prosecution of the
burden of proof … but merely lessen the burden on the prosecution by shifting the onus upon the accused.
However, such reverse onus would shift upon the accused only when the prosecution succeeds in prima facie
establishing the charge by adhering to the standard of proof of preponderance of probability. It is only then,
the accused would have to displace the presumption of guilt.”
Statutes like Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; and Terrorist and Disruptive
Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, provide for presumption of guilt if the circumstances provided in those
Statutes are found to be fulfilled…However, such a presumption can also be raised only when certain
foundational facts are established by the prosecution.
Therefore, the reverse burden of proof is in fact an attempt to lower the burden and vulnerabilities on child
witnesses and to ensure effective implementation of the POCSO Act, to achieve its object of protection of children.
412
Suggested Readings
▪ Jitender v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8723.
▪ Sukhar v. State of Uttar Pradesh (1999) 9 SCC 507.
▪ Manish v. State of Maharashtra 2019 SCC OnLine Bom 1154.
▪ State of T.N v. Suresh and Anr (1998) 2 SCC 372.
▪ Babu Vs. State of Kerala, (2010) 9 SCC 189.
▪ Manirul Islam @ Manirul Zaman Vs. State of Assam, 2021 (3) GLT 128.
▪ Lal, B. (2023). The Law of Evidence. 24th edn. Central Law Agency.
▪ Ratanlal. Dhirajlal. (2019). The Law of Evidence. 27th edn. LexisNexis.
Additional Material
Excerpts from High Court and Supreme Court judgments for the Activity: ‘Let’s analyse a few cases’.
On the basis of these excerpts from High Court and Supreme Court judgments, the following questions can
be put to participants to elicit responses related to their understanding of the case law on hearsay in CSA
cases.
Manish v. State of Maharashtra (2019 Bombay HC)
● “The evidence of PW 2 and PW 7 as regards the disclosure made by the child victim though hearsay is
admissible in view of the provisions of section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act…”
● “…Section 6 is an exception to the rule of evidence that hearsay evidence is not admissible. The
statement must relate to the fact in issue or relevant thereto and must be substantially contemporaneous
with the fact. Such statement, though not evidence of the truth of the matters stated, are of corroborative
value…provided such evidence is almost contemporaneous with the fact/s excluding the possibility of
fabrication.”
State of T.N v. Suresh and Anr (1998 SC)
● “We think that the expression "at or about the time when the fact took place" in Section 157 of the
Evidence Act should be understood in the context according to the facts and circumstances of each case. The
mere fact that there was an intervening period of a few days, in a given case, may not be sufficient to exclude
the statement…The test to be adopted, therefore, is this; Did the witness have the opportunity to concoct or
to have been tutored?”
● "There can be no hard and fast rule about the 'at or about the' condition in Section 157. The main test
is whether the statement was made as early as can reasonably be expected in the circumstances of the case
and before there was opportunity for tutoring or concoction".
413
Concept
In the realm of child protection and criminal justice, cases involving allegations of child sexual abuse demand a
comprehensive and developmentally-sensitive approach. The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO)
Act, enacted in India to safeguard children from sexual exploitation, emphasizes the significance of medical evidence
in establishing the veracity of such allegations. This Chapter delves into the intricate process of appreciating medical
evidence within the context of POCSO cases, recognizing the pivotal role it plays in arriving at a scientifically-
informed judicial determination.
This chapter will also explore the multifaceted challenges faced by medical professionals, legal practitioners, and
judicial authorities when interpreting and evaluating medical evidence. From the delicate task of conducting medical
examinations to the meticulous analysis of forensic reports, each step holds the potential to shape the course of
justice for both the survivor and the accused.
Against the backdrop of evolving medical knowledge, forensic methodologies, and legal precedents, this chapter
delves into the complexities surrounding the interpretation of medical findings. It underscores the importance of
multidisciplinary collaboration, where medical experts, psychologists, social workers, and legal experts converge to
ensure a holistic understanding of children's experiences and the implications of medical evidence.
Ultimately, the objective of this chapter is to provide insights into the intricacies of appreciating medical evidence in
POCSO cases, fostering a nuanced understanding of the interplay between medical expertise and legal proceedings.
By examining the dynamics at play, the chapter aims to equip legal professionals, medical practitioners, and
stakeholders within the justice system with the knowledge and tools required to ensure that justice is served while
prioritizing the physical, emotional, and psychological well-being of child victims and victim-witnesses.
Medical Examination
According to the Handbook on Medical Examination of Survivors of Sexual Violence (and POCSO), the following must
be done during medical examination:
• History taking
• Medical examination
414
• Providing therapeutic care including immediate treatment of physical injuries, mental trauma, provision of
emergency contraception, pregnancy advice, STI care, etc.
While one of the key imperatives for medical examination is to collect and document evidence, this is NOT the only
objective…
The consent form has to be signed by the child if the age of the child on the date of examination is 12 years and
above. In addition to the child’s signature, the medical officer, parent, and a witness have to sign the consent form. In
case the child’s age on the date of examination is below 12 years, he/she need not sign the consent form. Children
diagnosed with neurodevelopmental disorders, especially Intellectual Disability or autism spectrum disorder, may not
understand the information provided about medical examination and sample collection. In such cases the consent of
parent must be obtained.
A child and/or parent may refuse consent for medical examination and sample collection or specifically for
examination of anogenital area or specifically for sample collection. The medical officer has to clearly document the
refusal of consent for either of the above-mentioned scenarios. The child should be provided necessary medical and
psychological support even if there is a refusal of consent.
History taking
The medical officer has to obtain a detailed history from the child as well as parent prior to medical examination and
sample collection. History taking has to be done in a sensitive, non-judgemental manner. It is important to initiate
the interview with child and parent using neutral questions to build adequate rapport and explain the purpose of the
interview.
• Socio-demographic details
• Informants: Whether one parent or both parents or other caregivers
• Referral: Self-referred or referred by other medical specialist or referred by Child Welfare Committee (CWC)
or referred by Special Juvenile Police Unit (SJPU) or referred from school or referred from a child care
institution
• Reason for consultation: any emotional and/or behavioural symptoms, functional impairment, physical
injuries after alleged CSA, physical symptoms after alleged CSA etc.
• Family history: any medical illness, any psychiatric illness, any neurodevelopmental disorder, any substance
abuse, family relationships, any family conflict etc.
415
All hospitals have to ensure that all the medical officers on out-patient, in-patient and emergency duties are formally
trained in conducting medical examination and sample collection for children with history of alleged sexual abuse. It
is mandatory to prepare standard operating procedures (SOPs) related to medical examination and sample collection
and ensure regular training of all the medical officers using the SOPs.
• The hospitals can empanel subject experts in the area of Paediatrics, Forensic Medicine, and Gynaecology who
have experience in the area of child sexual abuse to prepare the above-mentioned SOPs.
• Informed consent has to be obtained from child (12 years and above) and parent prior to medical examination
• All hospitals should ensure spaces with adequate lighting, examination cot and privacy in the out-patient, in-
patient and emergency settings for conducting medical examination of the children.
• The presence of the child’s parent is mandatory during the medical examination.
• The medical examination for girl children should be carried out by a female medical officer. In case a female
medical officer is not available, the medical examination of the girl child should be done in the presence of a
female attendant (for example a female staff nurse on duty).
• Police personnel should not be allowed inside the examination room.
• Hospitals should procure adequate number of Sexual Assault Forensic Evidence (SAFE) kits and ensure proper
storage of the kits at accessible areas of out-patient, in-patient and emergency settings. Each SAFE kit includes
the below mentioned items:
Glass slides
Envelopes or boxes for individual evidence samples
Labels
Lac(sealing wax) Stick for sealing
Clean clothing, shower/hygiene items for survivors use after the examination
Responsibilities of Hospitals
All hospitals have to ensure that all the medical officers on out-patient, in-patient and emergency duties are
formally trained in conducting medical examination and sample collection for children with history of alleged
sexual abuse. It is mandatory to prepare standard operating procedures (SOPs) related to medical examination
and sample collection and ensure regular training of all the medical officers, nursing staff, and lab staff using the
SOPs.
The hospitals can empanel subject experts in the area of Paediatrics Forensic Medicine, and Gynaecology who
have experience in the area of child sexual abuse to draft the aforementioned SOPs and to train the hospital staff.
The hospital administration has to ensure timely OP/emergency registration, conduct of medical examination,
medical investigations, sample collection, and provision of medical and psychological care to survivors of child
sexual abuse.
The OP/Emergency registration, medical examination, sample collection, any investigations, medical treatment and
psychological therapy to the child have to be provided free of cost. A copy of all the documents has to be
provided to the child’s parent free of cost.
Body and genital evidence for both clinical and forensic purposes should be collected simultaneously after
explaining the purpose and process to the survivor/victim.
Maintaining the chain of custody of evidence collected is the responsibility of the doctor/ hospital. Every hospital
should identify and designate key persons who will maintain the chain of custody till it is handed over to the
police, hospital laboratory or the forensic laboratory.
All collected evidence should be packed, labelled and sealed properly ensuring that there is prevention of loss,
decay or deterioration of evidence by taking precautions such as adding suitable preservatives or air drying in
shade, wherever appropriate.
The medical officer conducting the medical examination has to duly provide Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) for
STIs and emergency contraception (in cases of suspected penetrative sexual assault), immediate medical/surgical
care and Tetanus prophylaxis for wounds, and immediate psychological support to child as well as parent.
Following the examination, the medical report of the victim and the accused require the following details, as per
the law:
However, evidence obtained from the medical examination of the victim and the accused plays an important
corroborative role, for two predominant reasons:
It is also important to note that while medical evidence can serve as the basis for a conviction (if reliable), it can
never be used to discard an otherwise cogent victim’s testimony indicating abuse, as held in numerous judgments by
the Supreme Court of India. This is owing to the available scientific evidence indicating the possibility of penetrative
assault without injury, and indeed, the poor quality of collection/handling of medical evidence in many cases.
In Indian medical jurisprudence, there are various types of medical evidence that are used to a broad or limited
extent. Each evidence-type has different implications for appreciation of evidence, and is typically accorded
differing evidentiary value. The following is an overview with brief excerpts from Dr Jagadeesh Reddy’s article
on appreciation of medical evidence in POCSO Cases:
● Trace Evidence: “Based on Locard’s principle of exchange, the trace evidence (which includes semen,
spermatozoa, blood, hair, cells, dust, paint, grass, lubricant, fecal matter, body fluids, or saliva), if detected,
(depending on the type of sexual violence), has good corroborative value as it is indicative of contact
between the victim and accused. This evidence has several limitations in getting detected, because it
depends on the time when the medical examination is carried out after the alleged crime. — with delays
accounting for loss of trace evidence; Additionally, post-assault activities like washing, bathing, douching,
urination, defecation; affect availability of trace evidence or evidence of semen or spermatozoa.”
● Injuries: “If injuries are present in a case, and the timing of the injuries is established, this will help in
determining the likelihood of the accused’s guilt. The 2003 WHO Guidelines for Medico-Legal Care states
that in only 33% of cases of sexual violence, (penetrative cases), there are injuries. This means that in two out
of three cases of penetrative sexual violence, injuries will not be present. Additionally, the timing of the
medical examination will also impact detection of injuries, since healing of such injuries occurs within a short
period of time. Typically, injuries are sustained when the victim offers resistance. Absence of injuries could be
due to various reasons—the victim being unconscious, either due to trauma, or being drugged / intoxicated,
overpowered, or silenced due to fear. The use of a lubricant in sexual violence cases also decreases the
chances of infliction of injuries.”
418
● Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs): Based on Locard’s principle of exchange, if either the victim or accused
is suffering from a STI at the time of the incident, then there is a possibility of transfer of microorganisms
(causing that STI), through body contact, from one person to another. Thus, properly conducting and
interpreting the tests to detect the transmission of STIs, as a result of the abusive sexual contact, could help
in corroborating the offence.
However, this evidence is often not collected properly, as at least two medical examinations are warranted to
detect these infections, —one as early as possible and the other, after the lapse of the incubation period,
depending on the STIs in question (gonorrhea, syphilis, herpes, HIV, or hepatitis).
● Pregnancy & its Complications: The products of conception, in cases of medical termination of pregnancy,
(MTP), if carried out, serve as medical evidence. If the baby is already born, then the DNA materials of the
foetus, when compared with that of the mother and the alleged father, would help in identifying the
biological father of the child.
● Evidence of Treatment: This is a new piece of medical evidence available in the form of evidence of treatment
and its documentation, in case sheets, discharge summaries, prescription sheets, and pharmacy bills, etc.
With compulsory treatment in every case of rape/sexual assault, this evidence will be available in all cases in
which the victim has visited a hospital and consulted a doctor, post sexual violence. If there is proof in the
form of medical prescriptions /case sheets / discharge summaries / pharmacy bills / analgesic drugs/
antidepressant drugs consumed post-assault, then these could act as indirect evidence of the pain sustained
by the victim after the assault. Finally, even proof of the psychological counselling sessions undergone could
act as proof of psychological disturbances, post-assault, that warranted the need for counselling, post-
assault.
• Several genital findings remain in the ‘indeterminate’ category due to insufficient evidence and lack of expert
consensus. These include:
(a) notch or cleft at or below the 3–9 o’clock position that extends ‘nearly to the base of the hymen’ but
is not a complete transection;
(b) complete transection at the 3 or 9 o’clock position.
Findings diagnostic of acute or past injury (category E)
Acute injuries to the genital tissues, including the hymen, for example, acute lacerations, bruising, petechiae
or abrasions, indicate recent trauma. In the absence of an adequate explanation, for example, an accidental
straddle injury, these findings are highly suggestive of abuse. The only two non-acute hymenal findings that
provide clear evidence of past trauma are:
(a) a complete transection of the hymen below the 3 to 9 o’clock position (defined as a hymenal defect
that extends to or through the base of the hymen, with no residual hymenal tissue seen at that
location); and
(b) a scar of the posterior fourchette or fossa.
The date and time of medical examination has to be mentioned on the document. The medical officer’s official
seal along with the hospital seal has to be affixed wherever the medical officer signs on the documents.
Two identifying marks of the child preferably from the exposed body parts such as face, upper limbs or lower
limbs have to be documented.
Documentation of findings should be done using a standard proforma prescribed in the Guidelines and protocols
for the Medico-legal care of survivors of sexual violence drafted by the MoH&FW, Government of India. The
findings of general physical examination, examination for external injuries, and examination of anogenital area
must be documented. The medical officer who conducts the examination has to include his/her opinion on the
findings.
Collection of Samples
The medical officer has to duly collect the samples mentioned below :
• Samples for evaluation in hospital laboratory - blood sample for screening for sexually transmitted
infections (HIV, HbsAg, Syphilis, Gonorrhea, HPV), blood sample for any medical investigations if there is a
clinical suspicion of underlying medical disorders, urine sample for urine pregnancy test.
Suggested Reading
▪ Narayanareddy, J. (2017). Medical Examination of Survivors/Victims of Sexual Violence: A Handbook for
Medical Officers. In United Nations Population Fund - India. United Nations Population Fund.
▪ State of UP vs. Chhotey Lal (2011) 2 SCC 550
▪ State of Rajasthan vs. Noore Khan (2000 (3) SCC 70)
▪ B.C. Deva vs. State of Karnataka (2007) 12 SCC 122
▪ Radhu vs. State of Madhya Pradesh 2007 CRI.L.J 4704
▪ Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. (2003). [E-book]. World Health Organisation.
https://www.un.org/sexualviolenceinconflict/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/report/guidelines-for-medico-
legal-care-for-victims-of-sexual-violence/924154628X.pdf
▪ Wong, G. (2019). Forensic medical evaluation of children who present with suspected sexual abuse: How do
we know what we know? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 55(12), 1492–1496.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14691
▪ Guidelines and protocols medico legal care for survivors victims of sexual violence | Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare | GOI. (n.d.). https://main.mohfw.gov.in/reports/guidelines-and-protocols-medico-legal-
care-survivors-victims-sexual-violence
▪ Model Guidelines Under Protection of Children From Sexual Offences POCSO ACT,2012 | Ministry of Women
& Child Development |IN | tlcsf. (n.d.). https://wcd.nic.in/policies/model-guidelines-under-protection-
children-sexual-offences-pocso-act2012
▪ Laraque, D., DeMattia, A., & Low, C. (2006). Forensic child abuse evaluation: a review. The Mount Sinai
Journal of Medicine, New York, 73(8), 1138-1147.
▪ Stark, M. M. (Ed.). (2011). Clinical forensic medicine: a physician's guide (Vol. 473). New York: Humana press.
▪ Palusci, V. J., Cox, E. O., Shatz, E. M., & Schultze, J. M. (2006). Urgent medical assessment after child sexual
abuse. Child abuse & neglect, 30(4), 367-380.
▪ Modelli, M. E., Galvão, M. F., & Pratesi, R. (2012). Child sexual abuse. Forensic science international, 217(1-3),
1-4.
▪ Hansen, L. A., Mikkelsen, S. J., Sabroe, S., & Charles, A. V. (2010). Medical findings and legal outcomes in
sexually abused children. Journal of forensic sciences, 55(1), 104-109.
▪ Silva, W. D. S., Ribeiro, F. M., Guimarães, G. K., Santos, M. D. S. D., Almeida, V. P. D. S., & Barroso-Junior, U.
D. O. (2018). Factors associated with child sexual abuse confirmation at forensic examinations. Ciência &
Saúde Coletiva, 23, 599-606.
▪ Wong, G. (2019). Forensic medical evaluation of children who present with suspected sexual abuse: How do
we know what we know?. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 55(12), 1492-1496.
▪ Adams, J. A., Kellogg, N. D., Farst, K. J., Harper, N. S., Palusci, V. J., Frasier, L. D., ... & Starling, S. P. (2016).
Updated guidelines for the medical assessment and care of children who may have been sexually
abused. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 29(2), 81-87.
421
In light of this reality, there has been a growing discourse surrounding the applicable rules of evidence, in child
sexual abuse contexts, the role of domain experts from medical/mental health backgrounds, and the suitability of
judicial standards in admitting and appreciating expert evidence. This chapter will briefly elucidate some of the
basic imperatives in the admissibility and appreciation of expert evidence.
Opinions of experts. –– When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science, or art,
or as to identity of handwriting, or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in
such foreign law, science or art, or in questions as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant
facts. Such persons are called experts.
In essence, the adjudicatory value of expert evidence is that of a reasoned opinion. As a result, it is not accorded
the same degree of evidentiary value as testimonial evidence (i.e., direct evidence from witnesses), and exists
solely to provide the judicial trier of fact with a scientific conclusion, based on commonly recognized principles,
and systems of reasoning, from domains such as mental health and medical science. As a result, an expert is
typically called upon to provide a conclusion/set of conclusions about a specific relevant fact, or about the fact-
in-issue itself. The expert’s opinion, however, as reasoned as it may be, remains an opinion till the judge is
satisfied with the conclusion and the reasoning provided, at which point the court is inclined to adopt the
reasoning of the expert. This opinion thus becomes an opinion of the court and may assist in a judicial finding of
guilt.
Consequently, the judge is also liable to dismiss an expert’s opinion if these basic imperatives are not satisfied.
422
• Facts in Issue
• Relevant Facts
Usually, under the law of Evidence, third parties, that is, persons who are unacquainted with the facts and
circumstances of the case are not called upon to give their testimony, opinion or witness in any criminal trial.
As discussed above, expert evidence is a limited exception to this. The question then is, what are the limits to this
exception?
Experts are only to testify about facts within their exclusive knowledge i.e.: drawing inferences from factual
evidence (on the basis of their expert knowledge); and providing an opinion on the causal relationship between
an act and consequence for the victim, on one hand, and the link between the act and offender (where available).
● Suppose, the question is, whether the death of A was caused by poison. The opinions of experts as to the
symptoms produced by the poison by which A is supposed to have died, are relevant.
● Suppose, the question is, whether A, at the time of doing a certain act, was, by reason of unsoundness of
mind, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he was doing what was either wrong or contrary to law.
The opinions of experts upon the question: i) whether the symptoms exhibited by A commonly show
unsoundness of mind, and ii) whether such unsoundness of mind usually renders persons incapable of knowing
the nature of the acts which they do, or of knowing that what they do is either wrong or contrary to law, are
relevant.
• Medical Issues:
In this context, expert evidence can help the court understand and evaluate the child victim-witness, provide a
scientific proposition (generally accepted by the expert’s professional community) and elucidate the
characteristics of child sexual abuse victims. Experts may also assist the court in evaluating the veracity of child
victims and the particular child’s statement, elicit the typical effects and symptoms of victimization, and provide
information on the characteristics of typical perpetrators and modes of perpetration, thus helping to identify the
defendant.
Mental health professionals may also specifically testify as to whether the child's symptoms are consistent with
the behaviour of sexually abused children.
There are two common scenarios where such evidence is critical to an accurate judicial determination:
• When the case depends on circumstantial evidence, expert evidence is particularly important in
establishing causality and inferences from relevant circumstantial evidence.
• Expert evidence adds to the tipping scale of presumptions in favour of or against the accused. Let’s revise
these presumptions again…
While the area of expert evidence can seem complex, experts are typically asked two kinds of questions:
424
a. Questions regarding their credibility: These questions are an important part of the process and are not
limited to the ‘years of experience’ or the ‘qualifications of the expert’… Questions can also be asked to verify
expertise in a particular subset of cases. For example, an experienced psychiatrist may be argued to not possess
sufficient knowledge if they have not previously worked with CSA victims, despite their proven expertise in a
different area of specialisation as a psychiatrist.
b. Questions regarding the case & expert’s involvement: As mentioned earlier these questions relate to
two broad areas within their expert knowledge: practise-informed inferences and opinions regarding causality.
State v. Brajesh Kumar Thakur and others (Muzaffarpur Shelter Home Child Sexual Abuse Case,
2018)
Introduction
In this case, following directions of the Supreme Court of India, the CBI was directed to take over the
investigation, following which they requested assistance from the NIMHANS team in two broad contexts: i) to
ascertain the mental health status and developmental abilities of the child victim-witnesses; ii) assist the CBI in
recording the children’s police statements.
Following this, a part of the NIMHANS team subsequently provided court preparation interventions for the
children, to address serious trauma and other mental health consequences of the abuse, in addition to also
assisting the court by providing an expert opinion. The relevant part of the court order is reproduced below:
“In terms of the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in M.A. No. 2069/2018 in Writ Petition (C) No.
473/2005, and pursuant to the request of the CBI made to the Director, National Institute of Mental Health and
Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), a team comprising of professionals from NIMHANS interacted with the victim girls and
the team assessed the mental health status and developmental ability of the children in the present case and
provided first level counselling to address their anxiety and prepared them to address the issues raised by the
Investigating Officer of CBI. After counselling of the victims by the NIMHANS team at the respective Children's
Homes where such victims were lodged, the statements under section 161 Cr.P.C. of such victim girls were recorded
by CBI officials.”
The child victim-witnesses were child and adolescent girls between the ages of 11 and 18, many of whom hailed
from contexts marked by adverse childhood experiences (ACES). These experiences included physical, sexual and
emotional abuse & neglect, and socio-economic deprivation, prior to institutionalization at the shelter home.
Some children also possessed pre-existing developmental disabilities (with effects exacerbated during
institutional stay) and mental health disorders, including anxiety & mood disorders/self-harm/post-traumatic
stress disorders
Institution Context
The shelter home was run by a non-government organisation. Children, mostly runaways and rescues, were
residing in the child care institution in Muzzafarpur. These children were observed to be deprived of
opportunities for education and development, including no facilities for recreational activities. In keeping with
the persistent nature of the abuse, these children were also not permitted to maintain contact with their families
or anyone else outside the institution.
425
Nature of Abuse
The abuse included sexualization and grooming (with rewards for compliance & physical abuse/coercion in case
of non-compliance), exposure of children to sexual videos, coercion to ‘sleep’ with women institution staff,
forcibly requiring children to wear sexually suggestive and age-inappropriate clothes, and requirements for
children to engage in age-inappropriate dance routines. In addition to the above, many children were also
subjected to drug-facilitated penetrative sexual intercourse. There was also frequent use of physical abuse and
violence to maintain secrecy surrounding the abuse and ensure compliance.
The perpetrators included known & unknown individuals, including, institutional staff (male & female), non-
institutional staff (carpenters/plumbers/drivers, Child Welfare Committee members), and other unknown persons
(associates of staff). Each child had suffered multiple episodes of abuse, by multiple perpetrators, over relatively
long timeframes (ranging from 2 to 4 years).
● Conduct mental health and developmental assessments for affected children in order to screen for mental
health morbidity and ascertain the psychological impact of child sexual abuse (CSA).
● Use the developmental and mental health assessments to ascertain the child’s capacity to provide
evidence/ testimony as child witness.
● Assist CBI investigative officers to interview and gather evidence from the children, using sensitive and
child-friendly methods of interviewing.
● Provide first level responses to trauma and identified mental health issues, and refer for further/intensive
treatment.
● Prepare children for court and support them through the in-trial processes.
● Make recommendations for mental health and rehabilitation focussed interventions.
Key Findings of the Court in relation to NIMHANS testimony and its assistance in the case
i. Charge-wise Findings Qua Accused No. 1: Brajesh Kumar Thakur (State v. Brajesh Kumar Thakur and
others (2019))
• “The next contention of the Ld. Counsel for the accused Brajesh Kumar Thakur and the Ld. Counsel for the
other accused persons is that the report submitted by the NIMHANS team (Ex. PW 38/A and Ex. PW 38/B) is
inadmissible in evidence.” (This was a critical submission of the accused)
• “NIMHANS is a premier mental health organization of the country and there is absolutely no reason to
doubt the impartiality or independence of the members of the NIMHANS team. I have already held that mere
giving of bald suggestions to the witnesses does not establish the plea of the accused persons” (in relation to
manipulation of the child witnesses).
• “There is nothing in the cross examination of PW 38, PW 39 and PW 40 (NIMHANS witnesses) which
persuades this Court to disbelieve the report of the NIMHANS team or to believe that the same has been
manipulated or fabricated.”
•
426
ii. Court findings on evidentiary value of NIMHANS Expert Opinion qua its Report and Oral Testimony
• “It is true that the report of the NIMHANS team cannot be considered as direct evidence with respect to
the alleged crimes committed against the victims. However, the report of the NIMHANS team establishes that
the victim girls were counselled by the NIMHANS team before recording of their statements by the Investigating
Officer(s) of CBI.
• The said report further establishes the factum of interaction between the NIMHANS team and the victims
and the factum of the victims disclosing the crimes committed against them to the NIMHANS team members
and therefore the said report has corroborative value.
• The said report can definitely be used for appreciating the conclusions with respect to the nature and
behaviour of the victims girls drawn by qualified experts of the premier mental health organization of the
country on the basis of their interaction with the victim girls. Thus it cannot be said that the report of the
NIMHANS team is inadmissible in evidence and cannot be taken into account for any purpose whatsoever.”
iii. Court Findings in relation to NIMHANS’ Expert Opinion on Mental State of Child Witnesses
• “The reports of the NIMHANS team Ex. PW 38/A and Ex. PW 38/B spell out the miseries and trauma
suffered by these victims and when these victims were initially shifted from XYZ CCI it is logical to presume that
they must have been under immense trauma. In fact keeping in mind the stature and power wielded by the main
accused (which is apparent from his ‘political resume’ spelt out in his statement under section 313 Cr.P.C.), it is
logical to presume that these children must have been under extreme fear and pressure as well.”
iv. Court’s Findings on Imperative for NIMHANS to assist CBI in recording child witnesses’ statements
• “On the other hand it is seen that when the investigation was taken over by CBI, pursuant to the directions
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the victims were counselled by the NIMHANS team, which assessed their mental
health status and developmental ability and provided first-level counseling to address their anxiety and prepared
them to address the issues raised by the Investigating Officer. Thereafter the statements of the victims were
recorded in terms of section 161 Cr.P.C. by the CBI officials and even the time of recording of such statements
the NIMHANS counsellor(s) used to remain present in the same room.
• This is in consonance with the provisions of section 26(1) of the POCSO Act, 2012. Moreover it also appears
that the investigation was not being properly conducted by Bihar Police and that is why the investigation was
handed over to the CBI.”
Court’s Findings on Primacy of S.161 Statement (CBI assisted by NIMHANS) over S.164 Magistrate
Statement
• “The NIMHANS team has also observed in their reports Ex. PW 38/A and Ex. PW 38/B that V-19 was very
shy and she gets anxious when she meets new people. It is further mentioned that she will be able to provide
detailed evidence after establishing a good rapport with a female counsellor and given the traumatic nature of
her abusive experiences she should be interviewed with reassurance in a sensitive manner. The observations
made by the NIMHANS team explain as to why V-19 did not open up and disclose her experiences regarding
sexual abuse before the Ld. Magistrate.
• In fact, as per the report she had disclosed regarding commission of sexual abuse by Brajesh Sir to the
NIMHANS team in detail. PW 38, the head of the NIMHANS team deposed that the team assessed the mental
427
health status and developmental ability of the children in the present case and provided first-level counselling to
address their anxiety and prepared them to address the issues raised by the Investigating Officer.
• Accordingly, her statement recorded after her counselling by the NIMHASNS team has to be given
precedence (over the S.164 Magistrate Statement). Thus, this argument of the Ld. Counsel for the accused is
rejected.”
Questions to consider…
• What were some of the important Court Findings on Opinions provided by NIMHANS that you identified?
Why?
• Which way did you think the expert testimony shifted the balance of the case: accused or victim?
• How did NIMHANS Expert Opinion assist the Court in arriving at its conclusions?
• “The Courts, normally, look at expert evidence with a greater sense of acceptability, but it is equally true
that the courts are not absolutely guided by the report of the experts, especially if such reports are perfunctory,
unsustainable and are the result of a deliberate attempt to misdirect the prosecution.
• The expert witness is expected to put before the Court all materials inclusive of the data which induced him
to come to the conclusion and enlighten the court on the technical aspect of the case by examining the terms of
science, so that the court, although not an expert, may form its own judgment on those materials after giving
due regard to the expert’s opinion, because once the expert opinion is accepted, it is not the opinion of the
medical officer but that of the Court.
• The essential principle governing expert evidence is that the expert is not only to provide reasons to
support his opinion but the result should be directly demonstrable. The court is not to surrender its own
judgment to that of the expert or delegate its authority to a third party, but should assess his evidence like any
other evidence. If the report of an expert is slipshod, inadequate or cryptic and the information of similarities or
dissimilarities is not available in his report and his evidence in the case, then his opinion is of no use…Indeed the
value of the expert evidence consists mainly on the ability of the witness by reason of his special training and
experience to point out the court such important facts as it otherwise might fail to observe, and in so doing, the
court is enabled to exercise its own view or judgment.
• The opinion is required to be presented in a convenient manner and the reasons for a conclusion based on
certain visible evidence, properly placed before the Court. In other words, the value of expert evidence depends
largely on the cogency of reasons on which it is based.
• The skill and experience of an expert is the ethos of his opinion, which itself should be reasoned and
convincing. Not to say that no other view would be possible, but if the view of the expert has to find due
weightage in the mind of the Court, it has to be well authored and convincing.”
428
Suggested readings
▪ Section 45, Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
▪ Dayal Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Uttaranchal, MANU/SC/0622/2012.
▪ Parhlad v. State of Haryana, (2015) Supreme Court of India.
▪ State of Haryana v. Bhagirath, (1999) 5 SCC 96.
▪ Anil Rai v. State of Bihar, (2001) 7 SCC 318.
▪ Kumari, K., Areti. (2007) Evidentiary Value of Expert Opinion Under Indian Evidence Act. Available at SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=956231 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.956231.
▪ Edmond, G., Cole, S., Cunliffe, E., & Roberts, A. (2013). Admissibility Compared: The Reception of
Incriminating Expert Evidence (I.E., Forensic Science) in Four Adversarial Jurisdictions. University of Denver
Criminal Law Review, 3, 31-110.
▪ David L. Kerns, Donna L. Terman and Carol S. Larson. (1994). The Role of Physicians in Reporting and
Evaluating Child Sexual Abuse Cases. Princeton University. The Future of Children , Summer - Autumn,
1994, Vol. 4, No. 2, Sexual Abuse of Children (Summer - Autumn, 1994), pp. 119-134.
▪ Crowley M, J., O'Callaghan M, G., and Ball P. J. (1994). The Juridical Impact of Psychological Expert
Testimony in a Simulated Child Sexual Abuse Trial. Springer on behalf of American Psychology-Law Society
(AP-LS). Law and Human Behaviour , Feb., 1994, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 89-105.
▪ Steele, D. L. (1998). Expert testimony: Seeking an appropriate admissibility standard for behavioural science
in child sexual abuse prosecutions. Duke LJ, 48, 933.
▪ Younts, D. (1991). Evaluating and admitting expert opinion testimony in child sexual abuse
prosecutions. Duke LJ, 41, 691.
▪ Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (2013). Expert testimony in a child sex abuse case: Translating memory development
research. Memory, 21(5), 556-565.
▪ Herman, S. (2005). Improving decision making in forensic child sexual abuse evaluations. Law and Human
Behaviour, 29(1), 87.
▪ Brodsky, S. L. (2013). Testifying in court: Guidelines and maxims for the expert witness. Washington, DC:
American Psychological Association.
▪ Mason, M. A. (1992). Social workers as expert witnesses in child sexual abuse cases. Social Work, 37(1), 30–
34.
▪ Kerns DL, Terman DL, Larson CS. The role of physicians in reporting and evaluating child sexual abuse
cases. Future Child. 1994 Summer-Fall;4(2):119-34. PMID: 7804760.
▪ Crowley, M. J., O'Callaghan, M. G., & Ball, P. J. (1994). The juridical impact of psychological expert testimony
in a simulated child sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behaviour, 18(1), 89-105.
▪ Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (2013). Expert testimony in a child sex abuse case: Translating memory development
research. Memory, 21(5), 556-565.
▪ Dodier, O., Melinder, A., Otgaar, H., Payoux, M., & Magnussen, S. (2019). Psychologists and psychiatrists in
court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? A comparison of experts in inquisitorial and
adversarial legal systems. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34(3), 254-262.
430
Additional Material
Case Matrix for the Activity on ‘Providing Expert Testimony in Court’.
• Context of the child
The child victim ‘X’ is a 9 year old girl who resides in a village. The girl’s parents often left her at home
during the day, with her two younger siblings, aged 5 and 2 years respectively, as they had to go to the city
to find work as daily wage labourers. As X had to take care of her younger siblings, during the day, she was
often absent from school. She stayed at home with her siblings, without any adult supervision.
X’s father used to come home drunk and would often get into physical fights with her mother. The child
too faced physical abuse by her father.
The accused ‘Y’ is a 30 year old man, who resided in the same village and was a family friend. He is an
influential man who had formerly served as the village Sarpanch. One afternoon, knowing that X was alone
with her siblings he went to her house. He asked X to let her siblings play for a bit so that she could come
with him to an eatery nearby where they could have some snacks and her favourite cold drink. Excited by
the prospect, X went with Y on his bike. Y took X to a nearby abandoned building and proceeded to drug
her and commit penetrative sexual assault on her.
• With X not having returned home for over two hours, X’s 5-year old sibling informed their neighbour. The
neighbour started looking for X and upon being informed by a shopkeeper who had seen X leave with Y
on his bike towards the abandoned building, found X unconscious, with her clothes torn, lying on the floor
inside the said building.
The neighbour took X to the PHC. Upon medically examining X, it was found that she had suffered multiple
bruises on her cheeks, chest, arms, abdomen and thighs. There were dried blood and faecal stains over her
genital and perineal region. X was also suffering from incontinence and complained of a burning sensation
while urinating.
The Medical Officer at the PHC reported the incident to the Police. However, Y’s family and associates have
been threatening X and her family to withdraw the complaint. Many villagers have also been persuading
them to drop the case as it would create unnecessary acrimony in the village and have shunned them. X is
also scared to venture out to even go to school.
1. Can you describe your education and training in the medical field?
2. How long have you been practicing medicine?
3. What is your area of specialization?
4. Can you describe the patient’s medical history and current condition?
5. Have you ever examined a child victim who had been sexually abused?
6. What examination did you conduct on the child victim, and what were your findings? Did you find any
physical evidence of sexual abuse, such as injuries or signs of penetration?
431
7. Based on your assessment of the child victim, are you able to estimate the general time the sexual
assault took place?
8. Can you rule out the chance that something other than sexual abuse, such as a medical condition or
an accidental incident, caused the child victim’s injuries or medical conditions?
9. Did you consider any prior medical issues or therapies the child victim underwent, and if so, how did
these affect your investigation and conclusions?
10. What possible treatment and conditions for recovery and rehabilitation would you recommend?
1. Can you tell us about your qualifications and experience as a medical professional especially suitable
for this kind of a case?
2. Are you a specialist in paediatrics/gynaecology/child psychiatry, which are relevant to this case?
3. How long have you been practicing in your field, and what is your level of experience in dealing with
cases involving sexual assault?
4. Have you ever been involved in a case where your testimony was challenged or discredited?
5. Can you describe the medical examination process you followed in this case? Is this the standard
procedure followed in these kinds of cases?
6. Were there any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the observations recorded by different doctors?
7. Were you present at the time of the assault, or did you rely on information provided by others?
8. Can you explain how you prepared the medical report?
9. Did you consult with any other medical professionals while preparing the report?
10. Were there any errors or omissions in the report?
11. Are there any limitations or uncertainties associated with your methodology or conclusions that should
be taken into account?
12. Were there any inconsistencies or errors in the medical records or test results that you relied upon in
your analysis?
13. Can you explain why there is a difference between your findings and those of other medical
professionals who have reviewed the same evidence?
14. Can you explain how you arrived at your conclusions regarding the cause of the injuries observed
during the medical examination?
15. Did you consider other possible causes of the injuries?
16. Can you provide any alternative explanations for the victim’s injuries or medical condition that are
consistent with the accused’s innocence?
17. Can you confirm that the injuries observed during the medical examination could not have been
caused by other factors, such as a pre-existing medical condition, an accident, or self-infliction?
18. Can you confirm that the medical examination was conducted within a reasonable time frame after the
alleged assault?
19. Did you consider the possibility that the injuries may have healed or changed since the time of the
alleged assault?
20. Can you confirm that you have no personal or professional bias that may have influenced your
examination or report?
21. Is it possible that your conclusions were influenced by assumptions or preconceptions about the case
or the parties involved?
22. Can you describe any potential alternative diagnoses or explanations for the patient’s symptoms?
432
433
Annexe 1
Sample Schedule for (In-Person) Training Program
Note 1 : In case the training program is being done continuously over the course of several days, it would be
critical to give some break days, as feasible i.e. one after each four-day block.
Note 2: The time durations provided for each session may be used to plan stand-alone sessions, including
online sessions.
Annexe 2
Power Point Presentations for Modules
436
437
438
Annexe 3
Resources for Working with Child Sexual Abuse
• Training Manuals
o The Building Blocks- Mental Health Care, Psychosocial Care & Protection for Children &
Adolescents
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Training-Series-1-Building-Blocks-1.pdf
(English)
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/HIndi-Building-Blocks.-PDF-1.pdf (Hindi)
o The Trauma of Loss & Abuse- Mental Health Care, Psychosocial Care & Protection for Children &
Adolescents
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Training-Series-2-Trauma-of-Loss-Abuse-
1.pdf (English)
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Hindi-Document-Series-2-trauma-of-
Loss-abuse-2-1.pdf (Hindi)
o Children in Conflict with the Law - Mental Health Care, Psychosocial Care & Protection for
Children & Adolescents
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Training-Series-3-Children-in-Conflict-
with-Law.pdf (English)
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Hindi-Training-Series-3-Children-in-
Conflict-with-Law-2-1.pdf (Hindi)
• Training Curriculums
o Essential Interventions & Skills for Working with Child Sexual Abuse- Introducing Mental Health
& Legal dimensions of Forensics
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CSA-Forensics-curriculum_Final-1.pdf
o Working with Children Affected by Sexual Abuse and Violence – A Training & Capacity Building
One Stop Centre Staff, Frontline Functionaries and Primary Care Workers
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Primary-Front-Line-workers_CSA-
curriculum_4th-Nov-2022.pdf
o Essential Child & Adolescent Mental Health Interventions & Psychosocial Care – For Mental
Health Service Providers in Secondary & Tertiary Level Facilities
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content /uploads/2023/08/Child-Mental-Health.SAMVAD-
NIMHANS-1.pdf
439
o The Child as a Witness: developmental and Mental Health Implications for Eliciting evidence
under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/The-Child-as-a-Witness-Developmental-
Mental-Health-Implications-for-Eliciting-Evidence-under-Protection-of-Children-from-Sexual-
Offences-Act-2012.pdf
• Life Skills Manuals for Mental Health Professionals and Child Care Service Providers
o Socio Emotional Development Manual for Early Childhood Care & Development
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Socio-Emotional-Development-for-
Anganwadi-Preschoolers.pdf
o Child Sexual Abuse Prevention & Personal Safety : Activity Based Awareness for Pre Schoolers
and Children with Developmental Disability
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CSA_Prevention-
Preschool__Disability_Kids.pdf
o Social & Emotional Development: Life Skills for Children Aged 8 to 12 years
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-
content/uploads/2021/03/Life_Skills_Activities_for_Children_7_to_12_years_.pdf
o Child Sexual Abuse Prevention & Personal Safety: Activity Based Awareness and Learning for
Children Aged 7 to 12 years
https://nimhanschildprotect.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CSA_Prevention_Module_7_12-
yrs_Oct_2017.pdf.
• Relevant Publications
Ramaswamy, S., Devgun, M., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2023). “The Child Needs to Tell it to Me in
Words”: Barriers and Facilitators to Witness Competencies in Child Sexual Abuse Trials. The International
Journal of Children's Rights, 31(2), 403-443.
Ramaswamy, S., Devgun, M., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2023). Balancing the law with children’s
rights to participation and decision-making: Practice guidelines for mandatory reporting processes in child
sexual abuse. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 81, 103464.
Ramaswamy, S., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2023). Transdisciplinary training for forensic mental
health in child sexual abuse in India. The Lancet Psychiatry, 10(5), 317-318.
Ramaswamy, S., Seshadri, S., & Bunders-Aelen, J. (2021). Building a research agenda for mental health
assessments in resolving legal dilemmas on adolescent sexual consent. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 66,
102907.
Krishna, C. G., Ramaswamy, S., & Seshadri, S. (2021). Integrating child protection and mental health
concerns in the early childhood care and development program in India. Indian pediatrics, 58(6), 576-583.
Seshadri S, Ramaswamy S. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Child Sexual Abuse. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019
Jan;61(Suppl 2):317-332.
Ramaswamy S, Seshadri S. Our failure to protect sexually abused children: Where is our 'willing suspension
of disbelief'? Indian J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr-Jun;59(2):233-235.
441
*Note – These videos/ YouTube resources are in addition to the clips used as part of the various activities.
443