HSQC and HMBC
HSQC and HMBC
HSQC - Heteronuclear Multiple Quantum Correlation. This 2D experiment correlates the chemical
shift of proton with the chemical shift of the directly bonded carbon. On the bottom axis is a proton
spectrum and on the other is a carbon. Cross peaks give the shift of the corresponding proton and
carbon. This experiment utilizes the one-bond coupling between carbon and proton (J=120-215 Hz).
HMBC - Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation. This experiment utilizes multiple-bond couplings
over two or three bonds (J=2-15Hz. Cross peaks are between protons and carbons that are two or
three bonds away (and sometimes up to four or five bonds away). Direct one-bond cross-peaks are
suppressed. This experiment is analogous to the proton-proton COSY experiment in that it provides
connectivity information over several bonds.
13C HSQC and 13C HMBC spectra of sucrose and 15N HMBC of 1-methylpyrazole are shown at
the bottom of this handout.
It is useful although not necessary to have already taken a carbon spectrum prior to taking HSQC or
HMBC. This 1D can be used as a projection for the 2D. A 1D carbon spectrum, acquired from another
NMR (like the 300wb), can be used as a projection. It is faster, however, to acquire an entire 2D HSQC
spectrum than a single 1D carbon spectrum and thus, sometimes, it is impossible to obtain a 1D
carbon while a 2D HSQC is possible. This is because these 2D experiments are proton-detected and
have much higher intrinsic sensitivity than carbon (this is not an effect from the differing abundances
of proton and carbon).
About sample size, tubes, and sensitivity: When sample quantity is very
limited, it is advantageous to limit the amount of solvent in which it is dissolved. If a normal 5mm
tube is used, however, this cannot be less than about 500µL without causing serious lineshape
(shimming) problems and the attendant loss of signal-to-noise. When one reduces the solvent
quantity in a normal 5mm tube, it is important that the sample be centered within the coil. To do
this, center the sample about the scored line on the plastic depth gauge.
There are special tubes (made by Shigemi) that can be used to restrict the active solvent volume
without causing line shape problems. They are available from http://www.shigemi.com/ or Aldrich
for a higher price. See John Decatur.
hsqctocsy.top HSQC-TOCSY – gives a TOCSY spectrum resolved into the carbon dimension
HSQC Procedure
1. Do not spin the sample. Lock, shim and take a normal 1D proton spectrum. Determine the proton
spectral region to be used - values of sw and o1p. sw is the spectral width and o1p is the center of
the spectrum. Always leave at least 0.5 ppm on the edges of the spectrum.
3. Read in the parameters for the HSQC experiment by typing rpar hsqcedsp.top or hsqc.top. Type
getprosol to update the pulse parameters.
4. Type atma to tune both the carbon and proton channel of the probe
5. Change parameters as desired. Click AcquPars. The F2 column refers to the proton (direct)
dimension and F1 column refers to the carbon (indirect) dimension. The normal range for the
carbon spectral width is from 0 -165 ppm since carbonyls do not usually have directly attached
protons. If you suspect you have an aldehyde, then the carbon range should increased to include up
to 220 ppm or so.
For Highest Resolution : use NUS (non-uniform sampling – see end of handout for
details)
• FnTYPE: non-uniform sampling
• NusAMOUNT [%] : 40 (valid values range from 25 -50 %)
• NusPOINTS : approximately ¼ of td in F1 (depends on NusAMOUNT)
For NUS, you want td in F1 to be larger than normal since you are only taking td*NusAMOUNT points.
6. Type expt to determine the time required for the experiment. Values of td in F1 and ns (and
NusPOINTS for NUS) greatly affect the time.
7. Type start to acquire data . You will see the lock signal fall and rise. This is normal.
PROCESSING
When data acquisition is complete, type xfb to transform the data. You may transform the data
before the acquisition is finished but the resolution of the 2D spectrum will be reduced. (Don't forget
to re transform after the experiment is finished). For NUS acquired data, you may get a license error
message. Ignore it. For NUS, you must have Topspin version 3.5pl6 or later. If not, download the
latest version from Bruker.com.
Phasing
The HSQC spectrum that you have just run is phase sensitive. You must phase it. An out-of-phase
spectrum will look strange and will show dramatic intensity differences on either side of all peaks. To
phase a 2D spectrum, one extracts individual 1D rows or columns and phases the 1D spectra. The
columns and the rows must be phased separately. If you have run the edited version, the color of the
cross peak indicates the phase and thus the multiplicity. Blue and yellow/green represent opposite
phase. CH and CH3 will have one color (yellow/green) and CH2 will have the other (blue). When
printing with a black-and-white printer, the color information will have to be added by hand by the
user (You!).
If you have used NUS data collection you need to first type xht2 and xht1 after xfb to generate the
necessary spectra for phasing.
Click to enter manual phasing mode. Phase the rows first. Position the cursor on a row that
contains peaks. Click the right mouse button and select add. Then position the cursor on a row with a
peak that has a different shift than the first, and right click and select add. The idea is to choose rows
such that the peaks cover a large shift range. You may add more rows but usually two in sufficient.
To phase rows, click . There will now be a red line on the largest peak. Adjust its phase using the
zero-order button, . Then adjust the phase of other peaks in the other row(s) using the first-order
button, . Click to save and return.
Click to repeat the above process on columns. The columns will often not need much phase
correction. When finished, click to exit phasing.
NOTE to MestreNova users: Automatic phasing usually works. Under Processing, phase correction,
select “automatic along F2” and then “automatic along F1”.
Linear prediction is a powerful method of improving the resolution of 2D spectra. Normally the FID
in the F1 dimension is not fully sampled –it is cut off. To sample it more completely requires more
points (greater TD in F1) and a longer experiment time. Each doubling of TD (in F1) doubles the
number of FIDs and thus requires a doubling of experimental time. Linear prediction is a processing
method which predicts these cut-off points. It improves resolution in the F1 dimension without any
increase in experimental time. It is done after the data is collected and can be optimized by varying
the extent of prediction and the NCOEF parameter.
If the signal-to-noise of your spectrum is marginal, then linear prediction is not recommended.
Crucial parameters are based on the value of TD (in F1) that was used for the experiment . Click the
acqpar tab find this value. The following parameters must be set and are found within the procpar
tab:
To execute linear prediction, you must re-transform the spectrum with xfb. Larger values of LPBIN
and SI MAY give even higher resolution. It is possible to use 4*TD for LPBIN and 4*TD for SI. If you
make LPBIN larger, also increase the value of SI. Trial and error is necessary to get the optimum
spectrum.
Linear prediction is normally done only in the F1 dimension. In the F2 dimension, it is better to
adjust the digital resolution (Fidres) to the appropriate value before acquiring the spectrum.
Projections
By default, low resolution 1D projections are displayed at the top and left of your spectrum. One can
replace the top projection with the high-resolution 1D proton spectrum you took earlier and the left
projection with a carbon spectrum. Place the pointer over the projection, right click the mouse, and
select external projection. Enter the exact filename as noted in step 2 above (including exact
experiment number, etc…)
Sometimes, the chemical shifts of the 1D projection do not align with the 2D spectrum. See the above
calibration procedure if this is true. Or, you may need to calibrate the 1D spectrum.
Peak Picking
You may create and annotate a list of peaks in 2D mode. It is easiest using manual mode. Under
Analysis, select peak picking. At the bottom of the menu, select start manual picker. Place the cross-
hairs directly over a peak and right-click the mouse to add or annotate a peak. One may delete an
HMBC
HMBC experiment is experimentally very similar to the HSQC. To run a HMBC, follow the above
procedure for HSQC with the differences pointed out below.
Type rpar hmbcea.top or hmbc.top to read in the correct parameters for HMBC. The hmbcea.top
gives better signal to noise and is preferred. To transform the data from hmbcea.top you must first
type xfb and then xf2m.
♦ ns - minimum number =2*n (must be a multiple of 2) the number of scans depends upon
sample concentration..
♦ SW in F1 (carbon) Since the HMBC experiment correlates carbons and protons that are 2 or 3
bonds apart, there are usually cross peaks involving carbonyls (if present). Use a carbon SW
large enough to include both. The default is 220 ppm.
♦ cnst13 - two or three bond J coupling constant. Default value is a compromise value for J=8Hz
but this can bet set to 5 or 10 Hz when running two versions (see below).
The three bond couplings vary with dihedral angle (Karplus relationship) over the range 0-15 Hz.
One problem with the HMBC is that one must pick a delay based on the value of the long-range
carbon-proton coupling. A delay value that maximizes the intensity of cross peaks from 5 Hz
couplings will minimize the intensity cross peaks from 10 Hz couplings. By default a compromise
value of 8 Hz is set. If desired, however, one can run two HMBC experiments, with two different
delay values of 5 and 10 Hz, in order to be sure that all cross peaks were observed.
The HMBC experiment is not phase sensitive. Simply type xfb (and then xf2m if you are doing
hmbcea) to process. Skip the phasing section.
NOTE for MestreNova users: for the HMBCEA experiment, you must select “magnitude along F2” that
is found under Processing, Phase Correction.
Nitrogen-proton HMBC
There are several differences between carbon and nitrogen HMBC. First, there is a difference in
sensitivity. Since 15N is about 1/3 as abundant as 13C, the sensitivity of the 15N experiment is 1/3
that of the 13C experiment. Scan times are 9 times as long for equivalent sensitivity. Another main
difference is the presence of long-range couplings in the 15N HMBC. 4J couplings are often larger
than 3J and 2 couplings so there will be cross peaks connecting atoms that are more bonds apart. The
coupling values range from 3 to 15 Hz so it is important to cover this whole range by doing two
versions with different values of cnst13. See the following paper for a series of examples of 15N
HMBC connectivities: Kline, M., Cheatham, S., Magn Reson. Chem., 2003, 41, 307-314.
To do 15N HMBC, the differences in procedure are as follows. Type rpar hmbc_n15.top to read in
parameters. To do two versions with different values of cnst13, use 5 and 10 Hz.
Since 15N is about 1/3 as abundant as 13C, the sensitivity of the 15N experiment is 1/3 that of the
13C experiment. Scan times are about 9 times as long for equivalent sensitivity.
Carbon Nitrogen
Technique Quantity Molarity (mM) Time Time
(per ml)
HSQC >5mg 15 10 min
2.5mg 7.5 40 min
500ug 1.5 12 hours
HSQC
C CH correlation via one
1`
bond OH
OH
3` OH
H 3`
6,6
4` `
1 5.5 4 2 3 2`
` O
O O OH
OH
H
1
2
OH OH
3
OH
sucrose
HMBC 6,6`
1`
1 3` 4` 2 34
5,5 OH
` OH
3` OH
C C C
2`
H O
O O OH
C5,3 - H1 OH
H
1
2
3 OH OH 1`
JCH= 0-15 Hz 3
(Karplus) OH
sucrose
3 5 4
2
1 3
5 4
NUS is similar but superior to using linear prediction for improving resolution.
Linear prediction is only a processing technique, while NUS requires collecting the
data in a different manner.
The problem with the 13C projection from a HMBC has been that its resolution has
been very low. Its big broad peaks didn’t even look like a 13C spectrum. Improving
the projection resolution resulted in a prohibitively long experiment; the number of
spectra, td1, had to be increased from 256 to 8K or so. With NUS, the resolution of
an 8K spectrum can be obtained with far fewer points and in much less time.
Shown below is a comparison of a standard 1D carbon spectrum (top) with the 13C
projection from an HMBC (below) taken with NUS with td1=8K and an extreme
sampling ratio of 10%. The intensities are not the same as the 1D carbon. The
intensities in the 2D reflect long-range CH coupling values. To use NUS, follow the
above procedure but with NusAMOUNT[%] set to 10.