Heat Trans Aerospace Propulsion: Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio
Heat Trans Aerospace Propulsion: Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio
bl S
Unclaz
63/34 Q1469S2
SUMMARY
T h i s paper p r e s e n t s an o v e r v i e w o f h e a t t r a n s f e r r e l a t e d r e s e a r c h i n sup-
p o r t o f aerospace p r o p u l s i o n , p a r t i c u l a r l y as seen from t h e p e r s p e c t i v e o f t h e
NASA Lewis Research Center. For t h i s paper, aerospace p r o p u l s i o n i s d e f i n e d
t o cover t h e f u l l spectrum from c o n v e n t i o n a l a i r c r a f t power p l a n t s t h r o u g h t h e
Aerospace Plane t o space p r o p u l s i o n . The c o n v e n t i o n a l s u b s o n i c l s u p e r s o n i c
a i r c r a f t arena, whether commercial o r m i l i t a r y , r e l i e s on t h e t u r b i n e engine.
r-l
A key c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f t u r b i n e engines i s t h a t t h e y i n v o l v e f u n d a m e n t a l l y
I
m unsteady f l o w s which must be p r o p e r l y t r e a t e d . Space p r o p u l s i o n i s charac-
2 t e r i z e d by v e r y demanding performance r e q u i r e m e n t s which f r e q u e n t l y push sys-
*I tems t o t h e i r l i m i t s and demand v e r y t a i l o r e d d e s i g n s . The h y p e r s o n i c 1
transatmospheric f l i g h t p r o p u l s i o n systems a r e s u b j e c t t o v e r y severe heat
loads and t h e engine and a i r f r a m e a r e t r u l y one e n t i t y . The impact o f t h e spe-
c i a l demands of each of these aerospace p r o p u l s i o n systems on heat t r a n s f e r
w i l l be e x p l o r e d i n t h i s paper.
INTRODUCTION
Aerospace p r o p u l s i o n p r e s e n t s a demanding c h a l l e n g e t o t h e h e a t t r a n s f e r
e n g i n e e r . The d e s i g n e r seeks t o t r a n s f o r m t h e chemical energy o f t h e f u e l i n t o
t h e u s e f u l work of p r o p u l s i v e t h r u s t a t maximum e f f e c t i v e n e s s . To do t h i s t h e
p r o p u l s i o n system must be o p e r a t e d a t v e r y h i g h temperatures and p r e s s u r e s w i t h
v e r y few p a r a s i t i c l o s s e s , a l l c o n c e n t r a t e d i n t o as small a package as p o s s i b l e
t o minimize weight. These requirements a r e f r e q u e n t l y i n c o n f l i c t and t h e con-
f l i c t o f t e n c e n t e r s around t h e a b i l i t y t o p r o t e c t t h e p r o p u l s i o n s u r f a c e s f r o m
t h i s h o s t i l e thermal environment.
SUBSONICISUPERSONIC PROPULSION
s t r e s s a n a l y s i s . We w i l l e x p l o r e t h e f i r s t t o p i c i n some depth, a l b e i t l i m -
i t e d , and touch on t h e o t h e r s .
A c e n t r a l f a c t t o be addressed i n t u r b i n e s i s t h a t t h e f l o w i n them i s
f u n d a m e n t a l l y unsteady. Most f l u i d mechanics and h e a t t r a n s f e r analyses
d i r e c t e d a t t u r b i n e s today a r e steady f l o w analyses. T h i s i s okay as l o n g as
we understand t h a t " s t e a d y " r e a l l y means t i m e average and t h a t t h e a v e r a g i n g
must be p r o p e r l y done.
As was p o i n t e d o u t e a r l i e r , t h e a u t h o r s i n t e n d e d t o c o n c e n t r a t e on t h e
unsteady n a t u r e of t h e t u r b i n e and t h e t i m e a v e r a g i n g ideas; however, t h e r e a r e
many o t h e r i m p o r t a n t heat t r a n s f e r problems i n t u r b i n e s and t h e y deserve some
mention.
An area o f s p e c i a l concern i n t u r b i n e h o t s e c t i o n h e a t t r a n s f e r i s f i l m
cooling. Film cooling i s not confined t o turbines. I t i s a l s o important i n
combustors, augmentors, and n o z z l e s . F i l m c o o l i n g i s t h e p r i m a r y method
whereby t u r b i n e engine h o t s e c t i o n p a r t s a r e p r o t e c t e d from t h e h o s t i l e thermal
environment. Every m a n u f a c t u r e r has an a g g r e s s i v e program i n t h i s area. F i l m
c o o l i n g d e s i g n methods a r e b u i l t l a r g e l y on an e m p i r i c a l base w i t h c o r r e l a t i o n s
based l a r g e l y on v e r y s p e c i f i c experiments f o r b o t h h o l e shape and p o s i t i o n
p a t t e r n . This i s n o t t o say t h a t t h e r e a r e n o t any v e r y f i n e general d a t a s e t s
i n t h e l i t e r a t u r e ; t h e r e a r e . One r a t h e r e x t e n s i v e , and q u i t e r e a l i s t i c , s e t
was generated by A l l i s o n Gas T u r b i n e under t h e NASA HOST P r o j e c t . (See Gladden
and Simoneau (19881 f o r a d e s c r i p t i o n o f t h e HOST T u r b i n e .Heat T r a n s f e r pro-
gram.) A sample o f these d a t a , r e p o r t e d b y H y l t o n e t a l . (1983, 19881, i s
shown i n f i g u r e 17. The f i g u r e shows a p r o g r e s s i o n f r o m no f i l m c o o l i n g , t o
c o o l i n g i n t h e l e a d i n g edge r e g i o n o n l y , t o , f i n a l l y , f i l m c o o l i n g o v e r a major
p a r t o f the a i r f o i l . I t i s c l e a r f r o m these t h a t t o g e t optimum e f f e c t
r e q u i r e s c o n s i d e r a b l e t a i l o r i n g , something h a r d t o do a p r i o r i f r o m a n a l y s i s .
Some a n a l y t i c progress has been made by m o d i f y i n g boundary-layer codes, as i s
a l s o shown on f i g u r e 17, b u t these a r e h i g h l y s e n s i t i v e t o e x p e r i m e n t a l i n p u t .
This i s a c r i t i c a l heat t r a n s f e r area t h a t c r i e s o u t f o r a s o l i d a n a l y t i c
base. There a r e , o f course, many f i n e e f f o r t s a t e s t a b l i s h i n g a s o l i d base.
The work o f Simon e t a l . (1985, 1986) i s b u t one example. F i l m c o o l i n g i s
e s p e c i a l l y unique f r o m an a n a l y t i c p e r s p e c t i v e . I t i s a h i g h l y l o c a l i z e d phe-
nomenon t h a t must be i n t e g r a t e d i n t o a g l o b a l f l o w code, t h a t a l r e a d y has more
than i t can handle. I t i s b o t h an i n t e r n a l - a n d e x t e r n a l f l o w problem, r e l a t i v e
t o t h e b l a d e . The c o o l a n t f l o w a f f e c t s n o t o n l y h e a t t r a n s f e r b u t a l s o t h e
aerodynamic and thermodynamic performance o f t h e machine. The a b i l i t y t o e f f i -
c i e n t l y and e f f e c t i v e l y f i l m c o o l t u r b i n e blades c o n t i n u e s t o be an i m p o r t a n t
technology i n t h e push t o i n c r e a s e engine performance.
SPACE PROPULSION
Space p r o p u l s i o n i s by r o c k e t . Rocket p r o p u l s i o n i s u s u a l l y s u b d i v i d e d
i n t o l i q u i d and s o l i d . With s t a b l e b i n d e r s s o l i d s a r e s t o r a b l e , immediate
response, g e n e r a l l y r e l i a b l e , b u t low I s p . Some l i q u i d p r o p e l l a n t s , such as
h y d r a z i n e , a r e considered s t o r a b l e , o t h e r s , such as hydrogenloxygen, a r e n o t .
Most transatmospheri c l s p a c e and n e a r l y a1 1 space m i s s i o n s r e l y on LH2-LOX
because o f i t s h i g h performance ( I s p ) . T h i s p r e s e n t s s t o r a g e problems on and
near t h e v i c i n i t y o f t h e launch pad, and i n space, p a r t i c u l a r l y f o r l u n a r and
p l a n e t a r y missions, which w i l l be discussed l a t e r .
I t i s u s e f u l t o s t a r t t h e d i s c u s s i o n o f t h i s system w i t h t h e o v e r a l l one-
dimensional systems a n a l y s i s , and t h e n some d i v e r s e h e a t t r a n s f e r requirements
such as LOX-pump b e a r i n g s and h e a t exchanger; fuel-pump p r e b u r n e r ; i n j e c t o r ;
and combustion chamber. Even though s o p h i s t i c a t e d technology, such as computa-
t i o n a l f l u i d dynamics (CFD) and comprehensive experimental r e s e a r c h , has been
a p p l i e d t o t h e components o f j e t and r o c k e t p r o p u l s i o n systems, d e t a i l s o f
t h e i r o p e r a t i o n , e s p e c i a l l y as a system, a r e u n a v a i l a b l e ; t h e y j u s t work.
These p r o p u l s i o n systems, l i k e many o t h e r s , a r e so complex, ( f i g s . 21 and 22)
t h a t even today no one model o r assembly o f models i s a v a i l a b l e t o p r o v i d e
d e t a i l e d i n f o r m a t i o n as t o t h e i r performance. For example, t h e one-
dimensional SSME powerbalance models a r e used t o d e s c r i b e what o t h e r w i s e can-
n o t y e t be q u a n t i f i e d .
As w i t h t h e t u r b i n e engine, h e a l t h m o n i t o r i n g i n f l i g h t and r e s e a r c h
i n s t r u m e n t a t i o n o f r o c k e t p r o p u l s i o n systems i s v e r y i m p o r t a n t . I n a d d i t i o n
t o t h e severe o p e r a t i n g environmen-t an i n s t r u m e n t f a i l u r e o f f e r s t h e p o t e n t i a l
f o r opening a p a t h between t h e oxygen and hydrogen. Thus, a major problem
p l a g u i n g d e s i g n e r s and r e s e a r c h e r s a l i k e i s sensor f a i l u r e .
V e h i c l e f l i g h t a t h y p e r s o n i c speeds p r e s e n t s s i g n i f i c a n t h e a t t r a n s f e r
c h a l l e n g e s throughout t h e p r o p u l s i o n system and t h e a i r f r a m e because o f t h e
v e r y h i g h aerodynamic heat loads encountered. Local s t a g n a t i o n areas can expe-
r i e n c e h e a t f l u x l e v e l s exceeding 50 kL4/cm2. Heat f l u x l e v e l s up t o 10 kL4/cm2
a r e common throughout t h e p r o p u l s i o n system. By n e c e s s i t y , t h e engine and t h e
a i r f r a m e a r e h i g h l y i n t e g r a t e d . Not o n l y do t h e y share a common s t r u c t u r e a t
t h e e n g i n e l a i r f r a m e i n t e r f a c e b u t t h e a i r f r a m e a l s o a c t s as a compression s u r -
f a c e f o r t h e i n l e t and as an expansion s u r f a c e f o r t h e n o z z l e .
A l i s t o f heat t r a n s f e r c h a l l e n g e s f o r h i g h speed f l i g h t i n c l u d e s : v e r y
h i g h aerodynamic loads, l a m i n a r - t u r b u l e n t t r a n s i t i o n , shocklshock and shock1
boundary l a y e r i n t e r a c t i o n s , f i l m c o o l i n g and s k i n f r i c t i o n r e d u c t i o n , advanced
composite m a t e r i a l s , combined t h e r m a l l s t r u c t u r a l a n a l y s i s , r e a l gas e f f e c t s and
w a l l c a t a l y s i s , and thermal/management o f t h e i n t e g r a t e d e n g i n e l a i r f r a m e e n v i -
ronment. These challenges p r o b a b l y l o o k f a m i l i a r s i n c e t h e y a r e major i s s u e s
common t o any t y p e o f advanced heat engine, i . e . , management o f h i g h heat loads
i n o r d e r t o m a i n t a i n s t r u c t u r a l l i f e and i n t e g r i t y . However, t h e r e i s an
emphasis here on high-speed f l o w phenomena such as shock i n t e r a c t i o n s near a
s u r f a c e , advanced m a t e r i a l performance, and thermal management i n an i n t e g r a t e d
e n g i n e l a i r f r a m e environment. T h i s l i s t i s n o t meant t o be i n c l u s i v e b u t t o
i l l u s t r a t e t h e scope o f t h e c h a l l e n g e . Each o f these elements w i l l be d i s -
cussed i n t h e f o l l o w i n g paragraphs.
I n summary, t h e t r a n s a t m o s p h e r i c f l i g h t e n v e l o p e w i l l p r o b a b l y r e q u i r e a
h y b r i d engine combination. I n t h e low hypersonic regime t h e a i r t u r b o r a m j e t i s
a c a n d i d a t e , b u t f o r most o f t h e h y p e r s o n i c r e g i m e t h e s c r a m j e t i s t h e backbone
p r o p u l s i o n system. F o r h e a t t r a n s f e r e n g i n e e r s t h e i n t e r e s t i n g f e a t u r e i n t h i s
r e g i m e , w h i c h i s d i f f e r e n t from t h e two extremes a l r e a d y d i s c u s s e d , i s t h a t i t
i s a l m o s t i m p o s s i b l e t o s h a r p l y d i v i d e where t h e a i r f r a m e l e t s o f f and t h e
e n g i n e b e g i n s . The h e a t t r a n s f e r problems a r e v e r y s i m i l a r , whether one i s
t a l k i n g a b o u t t h e e n g i n e o r t h e a i r f r a m e . Thus, t h e r e a d e r w i l l n o t e t h a t
t h e r e was v e r y l i t t l e e n g i n e s p e c i f i c d i s c u s s i o n i n t h i s s e c t i o n i n c o n t r a s t
t o t h e p r e v i o u s s e c t i o n s . P r i o r t o NASP, h y p e r s o n i c s had been o n a 15 y e a r
h i a t u s . The work shown h e r e i s r a t h e r p r e l i m i n a r y , b u t i t i s moving f a s t .
Two a d d i t i o n a l p o i n t s s h o u l d be emphasized. P r o g r e s s i n t h i s f l i g h t
r e g i m e i s h i g h l y dependent o n t h e c o m p u t a t i o n a l power o f advanced computers and
an a b i l i t y t o a n a l y t i c a l l y model problems and s o l v e N a v i e r - S t o k e s e q u a t i o n s
w i t h t h e e n e r g y e q u a t i o n and r e a l - g a s e f f e c t s ( h i g h t e m p e r a t u r e , r e a c t i n g
flows, etc.). The s t a t u s o f CFD f o r h y p e r s o n i c s i s d i s c u s s e d i n a r e c e n t
a r t i c l e b y Dwoyer e t a l . ( 1 9 8 7 ) . F i n a l l y , e x p e r i m e n t a l v e r i f i c a t i o n o f t h e s e
models i s g e n e r a l l y l i m i t e d t o t h e l o w e r end of t h e f l i g h t r e g i m e . V e r i f i c a -
t i o n o f t h e h i g h e r f l i g h t Mach numbers i s dependent o n p r o t o t y p e v e h i c l e s .
CONCLUDING REMARKS
I n t h i s v e r y b r i e f r e v i e w o f h e a t t r a n s f e r i n aerospace p r o p u l s i o n we have
seen a r e a s of commonality and a r e a s of d i f f e r e n c e . I n the subsonic/supersonic
p r o p u l s i o n a r e n a t h e p r i m a r y p r o p u l s i o n system, t h e t u r b o j e t l t u r b o f a n e n g i n e ,
i s a v e r y s o p h i s t i c a t e d machine and some v e r y advanced c o m p u t a t i o n a l and exper-
i m e n t a l t o o l s a r e b e i n g b r o u g h t t o bear o n a c h i e v i n g an optimum d e s i g n .
Sparked b y t h e advanced f l u i d mechanics and s t r u c t u r a l a n a l y s i s c a p a b i l i t i e s
and t h e a d v e n t of e x c i t i n g new m a t e r i a l s , t h e i n d u s t r y and government have l a i d
down a c h a l l e n g e t o d o u b l e t h e performance o f t o d a y ' s e n g i n e b y t h e t u r n o f t h e
c e n t u r y . The space program, on t h e o t h e r hand, has b u i l t a v e r y s o p h i s t i c a t e d
power p l a n t l a r g e l y o n an e m p i r i c a l base. The p r e s e n t r e v i t a l i z a t i o n o f t h e
space program i s c a l l i n g f o r a s i g n i f i c a n t advancement i n t h e t e c h n o l o g i c a l
t o o l s used t o d e s i g n and b u i l d space p r o p u l s i o n systems. F i n a l l y , i n a new-old
a r e a , h y p e r s o n i c s , a b r e a k t h r o u g h demanding t e c h n o l o g y o f 15 y e a r s ago i s b e i n g
r e s u r r e c t e d and combined w i t h new advances t o b r i n g t o r e a l i t y t h e t r u e aero-
space v e h i c l e , t h e t r a n s a t m o s p h e r i c v e h i c l e .
REFERENCES
Rogers, S.E., Kwak, D., and K a u l , U., 1986, "A Numerical Study o f
Three-Dimensional I n c o m p r e s s i b l e Flow Around M u l t i p l e P o s t s , " AIAA
Paper 86-0353.
Tam, L.T., Przekwas, A.J., J a i n , S.K., Mukerjee, T., and Costes, N.C.,
1987, "SSME HPOTP B a l l B e a r i n g Assembly Two-Phase Flow and Heat T r a n s f e r
A n a l y s i s , " C o n t r a c t B r i e f i n g a t NASA M a r s h a l l Space F l i g h t C e n t e r , NASA
C o n t r a c t NAS8-35970.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 10
MACH NUMBER
FIG. 2 PROPULSION OPTIONS IN THE HIGH MACH NUMBER FLIGHT ARENA.
AND PRESSURE LIMITS
0 2 4 6 8 10
MACH NUMBER
F I G . 3 OPERATING CORRIDOR FOR A I R BREATHING PROPULSION
OPTIONS I N THE H I G H MACH NUMBER F L I G H T ARENA.
.
F I G 4 CROSS-SECT ION OF A CONCEPTUAL ULTRA-H IGH BY-PASS RAT I 0 ADVANCED C O M E R ICAL TURBINE ENGINE
OF THE FUTURE.
FIG. 5 ARTIST'S VIEW OF A CONCEPTUAL ADVANCE .d
MILITARY TURBINE ENGINE OF THE FUTURE.
TURBULENT LEVEL
ONE WAKE
PASSING EVENT
L
0 I I t ' " ~ I
o0 15' o0 15'
BAR-PASSING INTERVAL
(b) PHASE-RESOLVED RNS (C 1 PHASE-RESOLVED HEAT
FLOW UNSTEADINESS. TRANSFER (FROESSLING
NUMBER. 1 .
F I G . 9 ENSEMBLE AVERAGES OF FLOW UNSTEADINESS AND STAGNATION HEAT
TRANSFER MEASURED I N A ROTOR-WAKE SIMULATION RIG.
HIGH REYNOLD'S NUMBER; 65-PERCENT GAP : Cx/U, = 0.78
/
ROTATION
TIP
- HUB
(b) ANALYSIS.
FIG. 11 RELATIVE TOTAL PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION AT FIRST STAGE
ROTOR EXIT OF A LARGE LOW SPEED TURBINE.
F I G . 12 COMPUTATION OF THE EVOLUTION OF' THE TOTAL TEMPERATURE
F I E L D WITHIN THE SSME FUEL TURBINE BY THE AVERAGE PASSAGE
METHOD.
COMPUTATIONAL
EXPERIMENTAL
PATH CD-87-29000
.
F I G 13 HIERARCHY OF EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS AVAILABLE FOR TURBONACH INERY
RESEARCH.
(a EXPER IMENTAL LIQUID CRYSTAL ISO-THERM (ALSO ISO-HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT .
U ,6
oc
W
V) .4
Z
Q:
E
0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1.O
* SURFACE DISTANCE, S/ARC
(b) SUCTION SURFACE OF HEATED VANE CASCADE.
FIG. 16 COMPARISON OF A MODIFIED LOW REY-
NOLDS NUMBER K-& TURBULENCE MODEL WITH EX-
PERIMENTAL HEAT TRANSFER DATA.
DATA Re2 X
4 2.49
1.96
13 1.51
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100
(b) FILM COOLING IN LEADING REGION ONLY.
DATA Re2 Pc/PT
.60 - 1.55E6
-
.40 -
A
-T
.20 - $4
0-
-
-0.20 -
Pressure Suction
I I I I I I
-0.30
100 80 60
40 20 0 20 40 60 80 100
SURFACE DISTANCE, S/ARC
(C) FILM COOLING IN BOTH LEADING EDGE AND DOWNSTREAM.
FIG. 17 FILM COOLING HEAT TRANSFER DATA IN A HEATED
VANE CASCADE. INCLUDING SOME COMPARISONS WITH A HODI-
FIED BOUNDARY LAYER ANALYSIS.
SYMBOL AT*
FLAGS OF
6 40
0- 80
--
LOW PRESSURE I
OPEN SYMBOLS - SMOOTH WALL
SOLID SYMBOLS - ROUGH WALL
HIGH PRESSURE A
0
,5 .4 .3
i
.2
I
.I 0 .I
I I
.2
I
.3 .4 .5
ROTATION NUMBER. Od/V
FIG. 18 THE EFFECTS OF ROTATION ON HEAT TRANSFER I N MULTIPASS COOLANT PASSAGES
WITH AND WITHOUT TURBULATORS ARE SHOWN FOR THE FIRST OUTWARD FLOWING LEG.
WALL
TEMPERATURE, TEMPERATURE,
K K
HEAT TRANSFER
,
COEFFICIENT,
V)
o
0
a m
4n
"T E d2 =2s
X D D S
o mr rs
E m 202 Z
V) -I I
E gV)
orn-12 ~
cn
m
D
m
ZW-I
2 0%"
O D ~ Z
D m
r 4 - I
Z-I D m A
D I r D W D
rn
D D 541
-I Z
2 4mg
2n
V)
=
0
3
FIG. 20 TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION ON A ROTOR BLADE IN REAL
OPERATING TURBINE ENGINE. USING A SCANNING OPT1 CAL PYRO-
METER.
FIG. 21 SSNE POWERHEAD CONPONENT ARRANGEMENT.
DHGDJAL PAGE 19
.DFPO92 QVALITy
FIG. 23 CALCULATION OF THE RADIAL TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION
FLOWING FROM THE FUEL PUMP PREBURNER INTO THE TURBINE.
ARM SPOT
WARM
#
F I G . 28 CORRELATION OF HYDROGEN HEAT TRANSFER DATA I N THE NEAR-CRITICAL REGION BY ACCOUNTING
FOR STRONG DENSITY VARIATIONS.
G ' I R I R J B NPAGE
~ ~ IS
OF,EOOR QWrn'B',Yi
VAPOR 7 r LIQUID
/- SUPERSONIC COMBUSTION
TRANSITION
BOUNDARY
,-I-, Re/H = 300
---a-
--- - Re/M = 100
I I I I I l l I 1 I I I I l l 1
102y I I
10 100
MACH NUMBER
FIG. 3 2 BOUNDS ON BOUNDARY LAYER TRANSITION CRITERIA FOR HIGH
MACH NUMBER FLIGHT.
0
( a ) PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION.
MACH NO.
r
FLOW
EXPERIMENT-U\SER ANEMOMETRY
BOW
SHOCK
I II 111 IV v vI
TYPE
F I G . 35 REGIONS OR CLASSES OF SHOCK-ON-SHOCK INTERFERENCES AND THEIR
INFLUENCE ON PRESSURE AND HEAT TRANSFER.
FIG. 36 SCHLIEREN PHOTOGRAPH OF A TYPE IV SHOCK-ON-SHOCK
INTERFERENCE PATTERN.
1.o
0.8 -
-
\
---
-\
V)
V)
Q
5
>
U
C,
o
Q
0.6
0.4 - \a;
Parthasarathy
& Zakkay
.ztrY 4%
rC
iii 0.2 -
0.1 I I I I I I 1
100 1000 1O,o
-
X X-0.8
S
FIG. 37 RANGE OF SLOT FILM COOLING EFFECTIVENESS DATA
FOR HIGH MACH NUMBER FLOW.
FIG. 3 8 THEORETICAL LIMITS FOR VARIOUS FLUIDS
TO ACT AS A HIGH ENERGY HEAT REMOVAL MEDIUM
I N A HEAT PIPE.
.
F IG 39 INTERDISC IPL INARY STRUCTURES, FLU IDS, MATERIALS, DESIGN, AND INSTRUMENTATION
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR VERY H IGH TEMPERATURE, HIGH HEAT LOAD ENVIRONMENTS .
"
4 6 8 10 12
FLIGHT MACH NUMBER
FIG. 40 PERCENT OF THE FLOWING FUEL NEEDED TO
PROVIDE A HEAT SINK FOR ENGINE/VEHICLE HEAT
LOADS.
px-.--
JR[!JIN,U: PA.GE jj3
2oox Q'C$AJ,rn%
I Nal~onalAeronautics and
Report Documentation Page
Space Adm8n$stratlon
NASA TM-100874
4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date
I Heat T r a n s f e r i n Aerospace P r o p u l s i o n
6. Performing Organization Code
16. Abstract
T h i s paper p r e s e n t s an o v e r v i e w of h e a t t r a n s f e r r e l a t e d r e s e a r c h i n s u p p o r t o f
aerospace p r o p u l s i o n , p a r t i c u l a r l y as seen from t h e p e r s p e c t i v e o f t h e NASA Lewis
Research C e n t e r . For t h i s paper, aerospace p r o p u l s i o n i s defined t o cover t h e
f u l l spectrum f r o m c o n v e n t i o n a l a i r c r a f t power p l a n t s t h r o u g h t h e Aerospace Plane
t o space p r o p u l s i o n . The c o n v e n t i o n a l s u b s o n i c / s u p e r s o n i c a i r c r a f t arena,
whether commercial o r m i l i t a r y , r e l i e s on t h e t u r b i n e engine. A key c h a r a c t e r i s -
t i c o f t u r b i n e engines i s t h a t t h e y i n v o l v e fundamentally unsteady f l o w s which
must be p r o p e r l y t r e a t e d . Space p r o p u l s i o n i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d by v e r y demanding
performance requirements which f r e q u e n t l y push systems t o t h e i r l i m i t s and demand
v e r y t a i l o r e d d e s i g n s . The h y p e r s o n i c f l i g h t p r o p u l s i o n systems a r e s u b j e c t t o
v e r y severe h e a t loads and t h e engine and a i r f r a m e a r e t r u l y one e n t i t y . The
impact o f t h e s p e c i a l demands of each of t h e s e aerospace p r o p u l s i o n systems on
h e a t t r a n s f e r w i l l be e x p l o r e d i n t h i s paper.
19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No of pages 22. Price*
Unc1assifie.d Unclassified 48 A03
NASA FORM 1626 OCT 86
*For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield. Virginia 22161
National Aeronautics and FOURTH CLASS MAIL
Space Administration
Lewis Research Center ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED
Cleveland, Ohio 44135
Official Business
Penalty for Private Use $300 Postage and Fees P a d
National Aeronaut~csand
Space Adrn~n~stral~on
NASA 451
I