MMW Topic 3 Reasoning and Sense Making - Continuation
MMW Topic 3 Reasoning and Sense Making - Continuation
Sense Making
Module 3
Learning Outcomes
At the end of the lesson, you should be able to:
q Discuss the vocabulary, syntax and semantics of
propositional logic
q Interpret formulas and sentences of symbolic logic in
Mathematical structures
q Manipulate Mathematical statements to produce logically
valid, correct and clear arguments
q Gain an understanding of the basic concepts of categorical
propositions, its types and categorical syllogisms
Learning Outcomes (continued)
Logical
Connectives 02
03 Truth Tables
Logical
Equivalence and
Inference
04
Negation
● Represented by ~
● The word “no” or “not” is usually present to indicate
negation
p ~p
T F
F T
Conjunction
● Represented by ˄
Words used to represent conjunction:
p˄q
●
p q
Ø p and q Ø p still q
T T T
Ø p moreover q Ø p however q
T F F
Ø p although q Ø p also q
Ø p yet q F T F
Ø p but q
F F F
n
Combinations in the table: 2
Disjunction
● Represented by ˅ p q p˅q
● Words used to represent disjunction: T T T
Ø p or q T F T
Ø p unless q F T T
F F F
Conditional Statement
● Represented by →
● Also known as implication
● Parts of the conditional statement p q p→q
Ø p – hypothesis – antecedent – usually follows T T T
‘if’
T F F
Ø q – conclusion – consequent – usually follows
then F T T
● Words used to represent conditional statement: F F T
Ø If p then q
Ø p implies q
Biconditional Statement
● Represented by ↔ p q p q
Formed by combining two conditional ↔
●
T T T
statements p → q and q → p under a
T F F
conjunction
F T F
● Word used to represent biconditional
F F T
statement:
Ø p if and only if q
Logical Connectives Summary
Negation ~
Conjunction ˄ T - True
Disjunction v
Conditional → F - False
Biconditional ↔
~p p^q pvq p→q p↔q
p q
Negation Conjunction Disjunction Conditional Biconditional
T T F T T T T
T F F T F F
F T F T T F
F F T F F T T
Logical Connectives Summary
Negation ~
Conjunction ˄ T - True
Disjunction v
Conditional → F - False
Biconditional ↔
~p p^q pvq p→q p↔q
p q
Negation Conjunction Disjunction Conditional Biconditional
T T F T T T T
T F F T F F
F T F T T F
F F T F F T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q Where n is the number of sentences
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
p q
T T
T F
F T
F F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
p q p˄q
T T T
T F F
F T F
F F F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
p q p˄q ~(p ˄ q)
T T T F
T F F T
F T F T
F F F T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
p q p˄q ~(p ˄ q) ~p
T T T F F
T F F T F
F T F T T
F F F T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
p q p˄q ~(p ˄ q) ~p ~q
T T T F F F
T F F T F T
F T F T T F
F F F T T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
T T T F F F F
T F F T F T T
F T F T T F T
F F F T T T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
T T T F F F F T
T F F T F T T T
F T F T T F T T
F F F T T T T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Number of
Example ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q) combinations in the
truth table: 2 n = 2 2 = 4 / 2 = 2
1. p˄q 4. ~q
2. ~(p˄q) 5.~p ˅ ~q 2 / 2 = 1
3. ~p 6. ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
T T T F F F F T
T F F T F T T T
F T F T T F T T
F F F T T T T T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T
3. ~q ˄ r T T F
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T
Number of T F F
combinations in the
n F T T
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
Where n is the number of sentences 4 / 2 = 2 F T F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T
F F F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F
Number of T F F F
combinations in the
n F T T F
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
4 / 2 = 2 F T F F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T F
F F F F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q ~q
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T F
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T F
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F T
Number of T F F F T
combinations in the
n F T T F F
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
4 / 2 = 2 F T F F F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T F T
F F F F T
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q ~q ~q ˄ r
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T F F
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T F F
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F T T
Number of T F F F T F
combinations in the
n F T T F F F
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
4 / 2 = 2 F T F F F F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T F T T
F F F F T F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q ~q ~q ˄ r (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r)
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T F F T
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T F F T
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F T T T
Number of T F F F T F F
combinations in the
n F T T F F F F
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
4 / 2 = 2 F T F F F F F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T F T T T
F F F F T F F
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q ~q ~q ˄ r (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r)
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T F F T
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T F F T
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F T T T
Number of T F F F T F F
combinations in the
n F T T F F F F
truth table: 2 = 2 3 = 8 / 2 = 4
4 / 2 = 2 F T F F F F F
2 / 2 = 1 F F T F T T T
F F F F T F F
Tautology, Contradiction, Contingency
Given the truth value of the main operation (main logical connective) in
the truth table, the following are some notable concepts:
Ø Tautology: A compound proposition is a tautology if it is true for all truth value
assignments of the involved simple propositions
All the values under the main operation column is TRUE
Ø Contradiction: A compound proposition is a contradiction if it is false for all
truth value assignments of the involved simple propositions
All the values under the main operation column is FALSE
Ø Contingency: It is neither a tautology nor a contradiction
The values under the main operation column is a mixture of TRUE
and FALSE
Tautology, Contradiction, Contingency – Example
Example 1 ~(p˄q)→(~p ˅~q)
T T T F F F F T
T F F T F T T T
F T F T T F T T
F F F T T T T T
TAUTOLOGY
ALL TRUE
Truth Tables and Truth Value
Example (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) p q r p˄q ~q ~q ˄ r (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r)
1. p˄q
2. ~q T T T T F F T
3. ~q ˄ r T T F T F F T
4. (p˄q) ˅(~q ˄ r) T F T F T T T
T F F F T F F
F T T F F F F
F T F F F F F
CONTINGENCY
MIXTURE OF TRUE AND FALSE
F F T F T T T
F F F F T F F
Tautology, Contradiction, Contingency – Example
Given the truth value of the main operation (main logical connective) in
the truth table, the following are some notable concepts:
Ø Tautology: A compound proposition is a tautology if it is true for all truth value
assignments of the involved simple propositions
All the values under the main operation column is TRUE
Ø Contradiction: A compound proposition is a contradiction if it is false for all
truth value assignments of the involved simple propositions
All the values under the main operation column is FALSE
Ø Contingency: It is neither a tautology nor a contradiction
The values under the main operation column is a mixture of
TRUE and FALSE
Basic
Topic Outline
01 Concepts and
Definitions
Logical
Connectives 02
03 Truth Tables
Logical
Equivalence and
Inference
04
THANKS!