Veneer and Crown Shade Matching A Digital Approach
Veneer and Crown Shade Matching A Digital Approach
1
S
hade matching indirect restorations of central inci- incisors that require different types of indirect restora-
sors with different types of ceramic has always been tions.2
a challenge for clinicians and dental technicians.1 A This article presents key details of the clinical and labo-
digital approach implementing the latest dental applica- ratory steps for chairside CAD/CAM restorations and a
tions (apps) for mobile devices can simplify the treatment case that illustrates a technique to predictably match color
planning, accurate shade selection, and patient communi- and translucency of a laminate veneer and a full-coverage
cation involved in this treatment. The combination of new crown. The presented approach involves multilayer mono-
CAD/CAM software technology with improved design fea- lithic restorations with symmetric support structures and
tures allows clinicians and dental technicians to success- ceramic laminate veneers to achieve a good match and
fully address demanding clinical challenges such as natural appearance.
matching the appearance and shades of maxillary central
QDT 2020 3
CONEJO ET AL
1 2
Fig 1 Dr Markus Blatz/Dr Julian Conejo Preparation System for CAD/CAM Restorations #K0394, Brasseler).
Fig 2 Intraoral view of the maxillary central incisor preparations.
4 QDT 2019
Veneer and Crown Shade Matching: A Digital Approach
3a 3b
5a 5b
preparation also simplifies the digital restoration design translucent multilayer preshaded zirconia blocks (eg, Katana
process and provides better design proposals (Figs 3a and STML, Kuraray Noritake) provide viable options in such
3b), especially for endodontically treated teeth, which have situations. The presintered zirconia blocks (Fig 4) are dry
less critical anatomical design considerations since they milled in a 4-axis milling machine (eg, MCXL, Dentsply
are not vital.6 Sirona) with carbide burs and are then fully sintered with a
When the abutment teeth reveal a noticeable color dif- speed sintering cycle in a small-footprint furnace (eg, Speed
ference after tooth preparation, the design proposals for Fire, Dentsply Sirona). In this manner, the entire fabrication
monolithic restorations should provide a minimum thick- process of a chairside full-contour monolithic zirconia
ness of 1.0 mm on the labial surfaces to mask any discol- crown takes only slightly more than half an hour (Figs 5a
orations and avoid discrepancies in the appearance of the and 5b).8 The restorations are tried in and delivered with
final restorations.7 A chairside digital workflow and high- the proper cementation materials and protocols (Figs 6a
QDT 2020 5
CONEJO ET AL
6a 6b
7a 7b
and 6b) with the goal to provide natural tooth morpholo- was calculated for ideal restorative space distribution (Figs
gies and shapes (Figs 7a and 7b). 10a to 10c). A 2D smile that included a proposal for the
maxillary central incisors was designed and used to ex-
plain the treatment and possible esthetic outcomes to the
patient for motivational purposes (Figs 11a and 11b). A
CASE PRESENTATION spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V) and App (Vita mo-
bileAssist) were used for shade communication with the
A 23-year-old male patient presented with an overcon- patient and the laboratory technician (Fig 12).
toured porcelain-fused-to-zirconia crown on the maxillary After approval of the 2D design, a digital 3D wax-up
left central incisor and a diastema between the maxillary and set-up were created with natural tooth shapes from
central incisors. Extraoral frontal, lateral, and anterior 12 the tooth and smile libraries in the DSD App. A resin mod-
o’clock views of the patient’s smile as well as intraoral pho- el was 3D-printed based on the digital wax-up, and a sili-
tographs were taken (Figs 8 and 9). These photographs cone index was made to serve as a guide for the tooth
and STL files of preoperative maxillary, mandibular, and preparations.
buccal intraoral scans were uploaded to the DSD App on a The maxillary right central incisor was prepared for a
tablet (iPad Pro, Apple). ceramic laminate veneer following common preparation
The maxillary intraoral scan was calibrated and posi- guidelines. The endodontically treated maxillary left central
tioned to the extraoral images to calculate the smile frame. incisor was prepared for a full-coverage crown (Fig 13).
The width/length ratio of both maxillary central incisors Digital and conventional impressions were made.
6 QDT 2019
Veneer and Crown Shade Matching: A Digital Approach
8a 8b 8c
QDT 2020 7
CONEJO ET AL
11a 11b
12
13
8 QDT 2020
Veneer and Crown Shade Matching: A Digital Approach
14 15
16a 16b
Two symmetric monolithic restorations were designed spathic ceramic blocks (Vita Tri-lux Forte, VITA Zahnfabrik),
(Fig 14) and a split-file was created on the maxillary left shade A2, while the zirconia coping was milled from a mul-
central incisor to obtain symmetrically shaped veneers for tilayer preshaded zirconia block (Katana ML, Kuraray Nori-
both central incisors (Fig 15). In addition, a full-coverage take; Figs 17a to 17c).10 The block was selected to mimic
coping was designed for the crown preparation (Figs 16a the shade of the contralateral prepared central incisor with
and 16b) in a shape that imitated a veneer preparation the intent to achieve the best possible color match be-
symmetrically to the prepared maxillary right central inci- tween the two most visible teeth.
sor.9 The two veneers were milled from polychromatic feld-
QDT 2020 9
CONEJO ET AL
After try-in and esthetic evaluation (Figs 18a to 18c), the CONCLUSION
feldspathic ceramic veneers were etched with 5% hydro-
fluoric acid for 60 seconds, followed by ultrasonic clean- Matching a veneer and a crown in the esthetic zone is one
ing. Following the APC technique,11–13 the zirconia coping of the great clinical challenges, especially when the abut-
was air-particle abraded with 50-micron aluminum oxide ment teeth present variations in stump shades. The reported
particles for 10 seconds. A ceramic primer that contains approach was applied in an attempt to match the restora-
both a silane and the zirconia-binding MDP monomer tions of the two central incisor teeth in a most ideal man-
(Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake) was applied ner despite the variations. Matching the crown coping to
to the bonding surfaces of the veneers and the zirconia the tooth prepared for a veneer in terms of both shade and
coping (Figs 19a and 19b).11 The zirconia coping and ce- 3D design allows for the fabrication of two symmetrically
ramic veneer were cemented extraorally with an adhesive designed ceramic laminate veneers that offer the exact
resin system (Panavia V5 Clear, Kuraray Noritake; Figs same material, shade, shape, thickness, and translucency.
20a and 20b). Extraoral cementation of the veneer to the A fully digital approach that includes all treatment steps
coping ensures a simplified bonding procedure, easy ex- from design to completion and even allows for chairside
cess cement removal, and ideal polishing process.12 The restoration fabrication is highly supportive of achieving the
ceramic laminate veneer for the maxillary right central inci- esthetic and functional goals in a variety of challenging
sor and the and bilayered crown on the maxillary left cen- clinical situations. Novel tools such as mobile smile design
tral incisor were inserted with the same resin cement (Figs applications further simplify these processes and improve
21 and 22) after proper pretreatment of the restoration communication with the patient and between clinical and
and tooth bonding surfaces.13 laboratory teams.
10 QDT 2020
Veneer and Crown Shade Matching: A Digital Approach
21
22
REFERENCES 7. Lee Y-K, Yu B, Lee S-H, Cho M-S, Lee C-Y, Lim H-N. Shade compat-
ibility of esthetic restorative materials—A review. Dent Mater 2010;
26:1119–1126.
1. Chiche GJ, Pinault A. Esthetics of Anterior Fixed Prosthodontics. 8. Blatz MB, Conejo J. The current state of chairside digital dentistry
Chicago: Quintessence, 1994. and materials. Dent Clin North Am 2019;63:175–197.
2. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Bahat O, Roblee R, Coachman C, Heymann HO. 9. Gamborena I, Sasaki Y, Blatz MB. Novel approach for predictably
Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry. J Dent Res 2019;98:1294–1304. matching a veneer to an implant crown. Quintessence Dent Technol
3. Coachman C, Calamita MA, Sesma N. Dynamic documentation of the 2019;42:6–14.
smile and the 2D/3D digital smile design process. Int J Periodontics 10. Tezulas E, Yildiz C, Kucuk C, Kahramanoglu E. Current status of
Restorative Dent 2017;37:183–193. zirconia-based all-ceramic restorations fabricated by the digital ve-
4. Igiel C, Lehmann KM, Ghinea R, et al. Reliability of visual and instru- neering technique: A comprehensive review. Int J Comput Dent
mental color matching. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:303–308. 2019;22:217–230.
5. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for 11. Blatz MB, Alvarez M, Sawyer K, Brindis M. How to bond zirconia: The
complete crowns: An art form based on scientific principles. J APC Concept. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016;37:611–617.
Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363–376. 12. Blatz MB, Conejo J. Cementation and bonding of zirconia restora-
6. Baba NZ1, Goodacre CJ, Daher T. Restoration of endodontically tions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2018;39(suppl 4):9–13.
treated teeth: The seven keys to success. Gen Dent 2009;57:596– 13. Blatz MB, Vonderheide M, Conejo J. The effect of resin bonding on
603; quiz 604-5, 595, 679. long-term success of high-strength ceramics. J Dent Res 2018;97:
132–139.
QDT 2020 11