Scribd
Upload
22 views1 page

04 ELMS Activity 1 (Prefinal) (Ethics)

Uploaded by

Marvz Ashura
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
22 views1 page

04 ELMS Activity 1 (Prefinal) (Ethics)

Uploaded by

Marvz Ashura
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Sumibo, Marvin Kieth J.

BT202A

1. For Kant, what is the role of reason in living morally?


— For Kant, the role of reason in living morally is central. Kant believed that moral
actions must be guided by reason, not by emotions or desires. He argued that the moral
law, which he called the "categorical imperative," is derived through pure reason and
applies universally. According to Kant, reason allows us to recognize our moral duty and
act accordingly, regardless of our personal inclinations or consequences. Reason, for
Kant, is the faculty that enables us to transcend our individual perspectives and act in
accordance with the moral law.
2. “What is legal is not always moral.”
— The statement "What is legal is not always moral" expresses the idea that the law and
morality are not always aligned. Something can be legally permissible but still be
considered morally wrong or unethical. The law reflects the minimum standards of
behavior that a society deems acceptable, but morality often demands a higher standard
of conduct. Moral principles, such as justice, fairness, or respect for human dignity, may
not always be fully captured by the legal system, which may be influenced by political,
economic, or social factors. Therefore, individuals have a responsibility to critically
examine the morality of their actions, even if they are legally permitted.
3. Differentiate rights from virtue theories.
— Rights theories and virtue theories are two distinct approaches in moral philosophy
Rights theories focus on the moral rights and entitlements that individuals possess, such
as the right to life, liberty, property, and freedom from harm. These theories emphasize
the importance of respecting and protecting individual rights, and they often rely on
principles of justice, equality, and fairness.
Virtue theories, on the other hand, focus on the moral character of the individual and the
virtues or qualities that a person should cultivate, such as wisdom, courage, temperance,
and justice. These theories emphasize the importance of developing good character traits
and living a virtuous life, rather than simply following a set of rules or principles.
The difference is that rights theories are primarily concerned with the moral obligations
and duties that individuals and institutions have towards others, while virtue theories are
more focused on the moral development and character of the individual.

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy