Chapter 7 His
Chapter 7 His
HIS REVIEWER
LESSON 6-10
Lesson 6: HEALTH MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
Healthcare administration were managed manually, traditionally starting from then patient registration to
consultation.
creation of documents proved to be time-consuming
posted a risk of having duplicate records
need for proper storage, which if not considered and practiced, could result to difficulty in retrieval
and high cost maintenance.
Getting an overview of the number of patients visiting the hospital, or the nature of problems that needed
immediate action, or even providing pertinent reports was very difficult to achieve. There are neither
snapshots nor a dashboard view, which is an important tool in the analysis of the performance of the
hospitals.
Accurate and real time records for equipment and drugs could not be obtained in a timely manner using
the traditional process, giving rise to the challenges such as
Accountability
Monitoring expiry dates
Stocks
Auto-indenting
Monthly reports send as hard copy, which is a real challenge for data analysis/comparison
Drug inventory/equipment inventory maintenance
Lack of standard names and code
Health Management Information System (HMIS) - addresses the need to enhance the management of
the healthcare services and to have a real-time data availability to monitor the hospital performance.
DEFINE CONCEPT, ROLE, AND FUNCTIONS OF HMIS
HMIS DEFINED
Health Management Information System (HMIS)
- an information system specially designed to assist in the management and planning of health programs,
as opposed to delivery of care. (WHO, 2004).
- one of the six building blocks essential for health system strengthening. It is a data collection system
specifically designed to support planning, management, and decision-making in health facilities and
organizations.
H- HEALTH: clinical studies assist in the understanding of medical terminology, clinical procedure, and
database processes.
M- MANAGEMENT: management principle enhanced by finance, law, and planning help administer the
health care enterprise.
IS- INFORMATION SYSTEMS: the ability to analyze systems and to design and implement advanced
computer applications makes the transfer of patient information efficient and effective.
a set of integrated components and procedures organized with the objective of generating
information, which will improve health care management decisions at all levels of the health
system.
a routine-monitoring system that monitors and evaluates the process with the intention of
providing warning signals through the use of indicators.
At the health unit level, HMIS is used by the health unit in charge and the Health Unit Management
Committee to plan and coordinate health care services in their catchment area.
According to the Ministry of Health (2010), HMIS was developed within the framework of the ff. concepts:
The information collected is RFIC
R- relevant to the policies and goals of the healthcare institution, and to the responsibilities of the
professionals at the level of collection.
SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND NATURAL SCIENCES
CENTER FOR NATURAL SCIENCES
F- functional; it is to be used immediately for management and should not wait for feedback from higher
levels
I- integrated; there is one set of forms and no duplication of reporting.
C- collected on a routine basis from every health unit.
ROLES OF THE HMIS
major role: provide quality information to support decision-making at all levels of the health care system in
any medical institution.
Ministry of Health (2010) – HMIS aims to aid in the setting of performance targets at all levels of health
service delivery and to assist in assessing performance at all levels of the health sector.
HMIS needs to be:
Complete – should provide information on all key aspects of the health systems without
duplication.
Consistent – if similar information is provided by different source, their definitions need to be
consistent.
Clear – should be very clear what all the elements are actually measuring.
Simple – should not be unnecessarily complicated.
Cost-effective – actual usage of each element should justify the costs of its collection and analysis.
Accessible – data should be held in a form readily accessible to all legitimate users, and it should be
clear who these people are.
Confidential – should ensure that people without legitimate access are effectively denied.
FUNCTIONS OF HMIS
Ministry of health (2010) – the information from the HMIS can be used in planning, epidemic prediction
and detection, designing interventions, monitoring, and resource allocation.
THREE FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING PHASES:
Data Input – includes data acquisition and data verification.
Data Management – also called processing phase; includes data storage, data classification, data
update, data computations.
Data Output – includes data retrieval and data presentation.
Data Acquisition – involves both the generation and the collection of accurate, timely, and relevant
data. In HMIS, this is normally achieved through the input of standard coded formats (e.g., the use of
bar codes) to facilitate the rapid mechanical reading and capturing of data.
Data Verification – involves the authentication and validation of gathered data. The quality of
collected data depends largely on the authority, validity, and reliability of the data sources.
Data Storage – preservation and archival of data may be regarded as part of the data storage
function.
Data Classification – known as Data Organization, critical function for increasing the efficiency of
the system when the need arises to conduct a data search.
Data Computation – involves various forms of data manipulation and data transformation, such as
the use of mathematical models, statistical and probabilistic approaches, linear and nonlinear
transformation, and other data analytic processes.
Data Update – maintain current data, mechanisms must be put in place for updating changes in the
face of any ongoing manual or automated transactions.
Data Retrieval – concerned with processes of data transfer and data distribution.
Data Presentation – has to do with how users interpret the information produced by the system.
Progress/encounter Notes
Compliance Expired Treatment Plan
Service on Treatment Plan
Progress Note Present
Financial General Ledger
Payroll
Accounts Payable
Financial Reporting
Organizational Determinants
Health workers and data collectors work in organizations’ environments which have value, norms,
culture, and practice.
Design and Implementation of Health Information Systems (2000) – The most important
organizational factor which affects the RHIS process is related to structure, resource, procedure,
support services, and culture which is used to develop and improve the RHIS process.
lack of funds
human resource
SAINT MARY’S UNIVERSITY
Bayombong, Nueva Vizcaya, Philippines
SCHOOL OF HEALTH AND NATURAL SCIENCES
CENTER FOR NATURAL SCIENCES
management support
Sanga (2015) – The effectiveness of the organizational culture is to improve RHIS performance,
promotung a culture of information use, which involves the ability and control o promote values
and beliefs among members of an organization by collecting, analysizing, and using information to
accomplish the organization’s goal and mission.
Technical Determinants
Sanga (2015) – technical factors involve the overall design used in the collection of the information. It
comprises he complexity of the reporting forms; the procedure set forward in the collection of data, the
overall design of the computer software used in the collection of information.
PRISM FRAMEWORK – known as Performance of Routine Information System Management (PRISM), this
conceptual framework broadens the analysis of routine health information systems to include the three key
factors:
BEHAVIORAL DETERMINANTS – knowledge, skills, attitudes, values, and motivation of the people who
collect and use data.
information,eading to better health system peformance and, consequently, better health outcomes. It is
founded on performance improvement principles.
LESSON 7: HMIS MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring
- the systematic collection, analysis and use of information from programs for three basic purposes:
1)Learning from the experiences acquired (learning function)
2)Accounting internally and externally for the resources used
3)the results obtained (monitoring function) and taking decisions (steering function)
Monitoring function partners and members review the implementation of policy based on
objectives and resources mobilized.
Evaluation
- assessing an ongoing or completed program or policy as systematically and as objectively as possible.
- to be able to make statements about their relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability.
- determined whether any changes need to be made at a program or policy level, and if so, what they are,
what went well, where is there room for improvement.
It has both a learning function - the lessons learned need to be incorporated into future proposals
or policy.
* Monitoring and evaluation are complementary.
M & E PURPOSE
Primary aim
-to have a strong M&E and review system in place for the national health strategic plan that comprises all
major disease programs and health systems.
Robust Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) System (RMES)
-assess the effect of integrated service delivery.
- A guide for successful implementation of integrated services and measures the effect on both service
delivery and use of services (FP/Immunization Integration Working Group, n.d.):
1. Appropriate indicators
2. data collection systems
3. data analysis to support decision-making
M & E PLAN
NATIONAL M&E PLAN AND SYSTEM
- address all components of the framework and lay the foundation for regular reviews during the
implementation of the national plan.
Existing country health-sector review processes - key events to assess progress and
performance
Country M&E systems -generate the information needed for global monitoring while minimizing
the reporting burden for countries
Joint Assessment of National Health Strategies (JANS) and health systems funding platform
provide new opportunities to align all partners around these principles (World Health
Organization, 2010).
Progress of any medical institution are monitored and evaluated through various activities such as:
a) monitoring reports
b)HMIS, surveys
c) evaluation studies
According to the National Health Mission (2014), strategies for operationalizing the framework should:
be primarily country-focused but also offer the basis for global monitoring;
address M&E needs for multiple users and purposes, including monitoring program inputs,
processes and results, tracking health systems performance and evaluation;
facilitate the identification of indicators and data sources, provide tools and guidance for data
analysis, and show how the data can be communicated and used for decision-making
bring together the monitoring and evaluation work in disease-specific programs with cross-cutting
efforts such as tracking human resources, logistics and procurement, and health service delivery.
M&E FRAMEWORK
Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) - a core component of current efforts to scale up for better health.
Health System Strengthening (HSS) - global partners and countries have developed a general
framework for M&E
The CORE: strengthening of a common country platform for M&E of HSS which should result from
better alignment of country and global M&E systems and can be used both for:
Indicator Selection
Related data sources
analysis and synthesis practices (including quality assessment)
performance review
communication and use
Monitoring Medical
Services
- indicators should be
tracked to assess
processes and results
associated with the
various indicator
domains.
-these indicators
provides information
on the strengths and
weaknesses of
implementation, and
can help to identify
“red flags” where
further investigation
and adjustments may
be needed.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN M&E WITH HMIS INDICATORS
INDICATOR
- a variable whose value changes
- it measures the value of the change in meaningful units that can be compared to past and future units.
- focuses on a single aspect of a program or project:
Input
Output
overarching objective
HMIS is designed to provide albeit some of the core input, process and output indicators.
HMIS indicators related to pregnancy care interventions are:
1st antenatal care attendances
4th antenatal care attendances
Cases of abnormal pregnancies attended at out-patient departments (OPD) of health facilities
Institutional cases of maternal morbidity and mortality due to Antepartum hemorrhage (APH),
hypertension and edema reported by In-patient departments (IPD) of health facilities
Cases of abortion attended at health facilities
Cases of medical (safe) abortions conducted at health facilities
HMIS indicators related to intrapartum care:
Deliveries by skilled attendance (at health facilities)
Deliveries by Health Extension Workers (HEW) (at home of Health Posts)
Institutional cases of maternal morbidity and mortality due to Obstructed labor
HMIS indicators related to post-partum care:
1st postnatal care attendance
Institutional cases of maternal morbidity and mortality due to Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and
Puerperal sepsis
HMIS indicators related to inter-partum (between pregnancies) period:
Family planning method acceptors (New and Repeat)
Family planning methods issued by type of method
The major causes of under-5 deaths in Ethiopia, with under-nutrition attributing to over one third of
these deaths:
Diarrhea
Pneumonia
Measles
Malaria
HIV/AIDS
Birth asphyxia
Preterm delivery
Neonatal tetanus and neonatal sepsis
Goal: reduce the global burden of TB by 2015, in line with the Millennium Development Goals and the Stop
TB Partnership targets of the World Health Organization (2006).
Core of the Stop TB Strategy TB: case detection and successful completion of the treatment/cure of the
TB remains. Hence one of the targets linked to the MDGs and endorsed by the Stop TB Partnership is by
2050 to reduce prevalence and deaths due to TB by 50% compared with a baseline of 1990.
The following flowchart puts the HMIS indicators (in green shaded boxes) in the context of the STOP
TB Program:
HMIS Indicators to Monitor STOP TB Program
TB patients on DOTS
Number of new smear pulmonary TB cases enrolled in the cohort
TB Case Detection
Number of New smear positive pulmonary TB cases detected
Number of new smear negative pulmonary TB cases detected
Number of new extra pulmonary TB cases detected
HIV – TB – Co-infection
Proportion of newly diagnosed TB cases tested to HIV
HIV+ new TB patients enrolled in DOTS
TB Treatment outcome
Treatment completed PTB+
Cured PTB+, Defaulted PTB+, Deaths PTB+
ROUSE 2005 –It is a perception of the data’s appropriateness to serve its purpose in a given context.
Having quality data means that the data is useful and consistent. Data cleansing can be done to raise the
quality of available data.
OBJECTIVES OF RDQA
VERIFY RAPIDLY
- the quality of reported data for key indicators at selected sites
- the ability of data management systems to collect, manage and report quality data.
IMPLEMENT
-corrective measures with action plans for strengthening the data management and reporting
system and improving data quality.
MONITOR
-capacity improvements and performance of the data management and reporting system to
produce quality data.
PARETO ANALYSIS
-it is based on the pareto principle which states that 20% of the work creates 80% of the results.
-potential causes are listed across the bottom of a bar graph with the important cause on the left
and least important on the right.