Marketing of Orange A Value Chain Perspective in T
Marketing of Orange A Value Chain Perspective in T
net/publication/312248698
CITATIONS READS
0 411
4 authors, including:
Md Ismail Hossain
Manarat International University
100 PUBLICATIONS 1,539 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Tohami Noor on 24 July 2019.
Abstract
Orange is one of the most import fruit crops that generate additional cash income for market actors. The study was
investigated the marketing system of orange , value addition, roles and functions of value chain actors with the help
of primary data collected from both farmers (forty) through simple random sampling and value chain actors (thirty)
through purposive sampling by using structured questionnaire and face to face interview technique. The gross return
and net return of farmers were estimated Tk. 2, 70,000 and Tk. 22084.77 per hectare respectively. Per quintal value
addition of orange of bepari, aratdar, wholesaler and retailer were estimated at Tk. 800, Tk. 340, Tk. 700 and Tk.
1000 respectively. The net marketing margin per quintal of orange of bepari, aratdar, wholesaler and retailer were
estimated at Tk. 293.59, Tk. 107.32, Tk. 356.46 and Tk. 700.8 respectively. Among the different actors, retailer
incurred highest (in percentage) value addition and net marketing margin. On the other hand, aratdar incurred
lowest marketing cost and marketing margin and bepari incurred highest (in percentage) marketing cost but adding
second highest value in compare to another.
Introduction
Agriculture is the backbone of the rural economy in where only Sylhet regions bear’s area under cultivation
Bangladesh. Rural economy is sharpen and regulated is 84.21 acres and production is 1005 tons (BBS,
by the rural masses and its development often relies on 2012). As of 2014-15, sweet oranges produced in
various economic activities they perform. Horticultural Bangladesh accounted for 40 thousand tons of total
farming is yet one of the major source of generating fruits production (BBS, 2014). So due to its high
adequate income. There are various kinds of production in the district, it is necessary to tap the
horticultural crops like fruits, vegetables, spices, nuts, potential of orange so that farmers can earn a high
tuber crops and medicinal & aromatic plants etc. return and cash from their high produce. It is important
to have an efficient marketing system, so that producer
The land and climate condition of Bangladesh with
gets appropriate returns for their produce and
abundant water and humid temperature is ideally
consumers get them at reasonable price.
congenial to the cultivation of Citrus fruits like orange.
The total area under orange cultivation in Bangladesh The production of orange being seasonal and localized
is about 2427.13 acres and production 1, 36,756 tons to favoured agro-climatic conditions coupled with the
327
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
perishability of the produce pose several problems on of 40 selected growers, 20 were from Sythet Sadar and
marketing front. Seasonal gluts, distress sale and 20 were from Jaintiapur upazila in Sylhet district
volatile behaviour of price are, therefore, common through simple random sampling technique and thirty
trend in all assembling markets during normal value chain actors such as 7 Beparies, 7 Aratdars, 8
production season. Then marketing and transportation wholesalers and 8 retailers were selected through
of fruit crops are other hurdles in the way of fruit purposive sampling technique. Data were collected
growers of rural areas who are also exploited by during the month of October-November, 2015 through
middlemen resulting in the low share of farmer in the primary sources though these month were the
consumer’s taka. Further, the continued adoption of harvesting season of orange. Secondary data also
unorganized marketing practices also lead to high collected from different published and unpublished
marketing costs, margins and price spread which all sources.
combine together to snatch away the economic
Analytical techniques
attraction which the crop holds and the keenness in the
producer farmers to invest in the improved technology Descriptive statistics were used for reaching the
and better inputs. Besides these factors the objectives of the study. Value chain mapping, and
development in rural areas is circumscribed by the simple statistical measures like sum, percentage,
specificities namely inaccessibility, marginality and average and ratios were used to explain the findings of
fatality which contribute in physical isolation distance the research. For estimating gross return, net return,
and high transportation cost. gross marketing margin, net marketing margin and
return on operating capital the following formula were
The overall objective of the study is to analyze and
used:
appraise the value addition of orange in various
marketing steps. The specific objectives of the study
Value addition at producer’s level: Value addition
are to identify the actors and their functions in the
(profit) at producer’s level was derived at by deducting
value chain of orange, estimate the cost and return of
all costs (variable and fixed costs) from gross return.
each value addition stage and identify the value added
The following equation was used to assess the value
to the product and estimate the percentage share of
addition/net profit of orange at producers’ level:
added value in terms of profit and cost for each market
π=PF.QF-(TVC+TFC)
actors
Where, π = Producer’s profit (Tk. /ha)
Methodology PF = Price of produce (Tk. /quintal)
QF = Quantity of produce (quintal/ha)
Selection of the sample and sampling technique
TVC = Total variable cost (Tk./ ha)
Sylhet district is one of the high yielding and widely TFC = Total fixed cost (Tk. /ha)
orange producing district of the country. The
Value addition at traders’ level: Value addition at
availability of orange growers and traders in Sylhet
traders’ level was calculated by deducting all costs
district were the main criteria for selecting as the study
(variable and fixed costs) from gross return. The
area for the present study. In the present study, the
following formula was used for calculating value
sample includes growers and different market
addition at traders’ level:
participants such as bepari, aratdar, wholesaler, and
GMM = Selling price-Purchase price
retailer. A list of orange growers of the selected areas
Profit (π) = Net marketing margin (NMM) = GMM-
was prepared through a preliminary survey. The
MC
sample size for orange grower was fixed at forty. Out
Where, NMM= Traders’ profit (Tk. /quintal)
328
Marketing of orange in Bangladesh
GMM = Gross marketing margin (Tk. /quintal) point. The main value chains actors involved in the
MC = Marketing cost (Tk. /quintal) orange marketing, their roles and inter relationships are
Value Addition (%) = (Sales price- Purchase discussed as follows:
price)/Purchase price × 100
The value chain actors perform the basic functions of
Marketing Efficiency the value chain. Typical actors of the orange value
chain in the study include farmers and different actors
To evaluate the marketing efficiency of different
such as Bepari, Aratdar, wholesaler and retailer. They
channels of different components following methods
are in common become owners of the product at certain
were used (Acharya and Agarwal, 1999).
stage in value chain of orange marketing.
i. Conventional method: Efficiency of any activity
From Figure 1, it is found that the orange in Sylhet
or process may be defined as the ratio of output to
district is moved through the following chains:
input. It is worked out as:
Channel І: Farmer→ Consumer
E= O/I × 100
Channel ІІ: Farmer→ Bepari → Consumer
Where, O stands for output i.e. value added measures
Channel ІІІ: Farmer→ Bepari→Retailer→ Consumer
in terms of difference in the consumers’ price and price
Channel ІV: Farmer→ Bepari→ Aratdar →
received by the farmer (Taka per unit),
Wholesaler→ Consumer
I for input (total marketing costs incurred)
Channel V: Farmer →Retailer→ Consumer
E is the index of marketing efficiency
A higher value of E denotes higher level of efficiency Channel VІ:Farmer→ Bepari→ Aratdar → Wholesaler
and vice versa. → Retailer→ Consumer
ii. Acharya’s method: Acharya has modified the The analysis reveals that marketing of orange in Sylhet
formula of estimating marketing efficiency, which district is moved from the hands of producers to the
is worked out as: hands of the consumers through six separate channels.
Pp In channel І, oranges are sold at primary market or at
ME (%) = × 100
(TMC + TMM) farmgate. This happens particularly in case of small
Where, Pp = Producer’s price growers who have small lots and prefer to sell at the
TMC = Total marketing cost earliest at orchard site in order and orange farmers sold
TMM = Total net marketing margin larger portion of their orange i.e. 80.71 % to the Bepari
ME = Marketing efficiency followed by 15 and 4.29 % to the retailers and
consumers. In channel ІІ, here the producers sold their
Result and Discussion
orange directly to Bepari and Bepari sold their orange
Actors involved in value chain to the Aratdar (70%), retailer (8.57%) and consumer
(8%) in consuming market. In the study area 79.75 %
Value addition is mainly concerned with the changes of
of orange was distributed through this chain (Channel
utilities. When product passes through distribution
ІV). In channel V, this chain contains three actors
channels, it creates place, time, and possession utilities.
levels i.e. farmer, retailer and consumer. In the study
For this reason this deals with identifying the actors
area 20.25 %of orange were distributed through this
involved in value chain and their functions of orange
channel. Channel VІ is the largest chain of distributing
marketing.
orange. The role of Bepari in this marketing channel is
It is clear that along with the farmer/producer, a to arrange transport and ensure that orange reaches the
number of actors participated in the marketing of particular market and to Aratdar or commission agent
orange from the production point to the consumer etc, where the grower wants to send his produce. Here
329
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
wholesalers buys orange from Aratdar and sells to VІ). They all took a portion of margins at each stage of
retailer who in turn sells to ultimate consumers (Chain value addition activities.
FARMER (100%)
(I) 80.71%
4.29%
BEPARI
70%
(V) 15%
(II)
ARATDAR
8%
70% (III)
WHOLESALER
55% 8.57%
RETAILER
IV)
79.75%
20.25%
CONSUMER
(100%)
(VI)
Producer
as Bepari, Aratdar, wholesaler and retailer either at the
The producers were the farmers who after harvesting
markets.
the produce performed the role of a seller in marketing
orange. Orange producers were the main actor and Bepari
played an important role in the orange value chain. The Bepari were also non-licensed traders. The Bepari
They produced orange independently and sold them to were relatively medium traders and they handled
the local traders or urban traders. In the study area the relatively larger volume of orange than that done by
producers used to sell orange to the market actors such other traders. They were independently organized.
They had no fixed business premises. Most of the
330
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
Bepari had no permanent shop staff. Crate sale or purchased orange from the wholesaler at the district
purchase was very common practice for Bepari. There level. They bought the orange in small volume on the
is strong competition among the Bepari at entry to this basis of open bargaining and sometimes on the basis of
type of business is not rather easy. As a result, Bepari pre-fixed market price and sold directly to the ultimate
could not make high profit in their business. The consumers at the retail shops. The retailers were the
Bepari were professional traders who purchased orange professional traders who used to sell their purchased
from the farmers, Aratder and wholesaler at the local orange to consumers directly. Most of the retailers
market sold it to district wholesaler and local were independently organized having permanent shops
wholesaler. They themselves financed their business usually in the open market place and labor for
and accepted loan in rare case. performing retailing activities. There were some
retailers who had no permanent shop usually use open
Aratdar
market place for their sale. Most of the retailers had
The Aratdar were licensed traders. The Aratdar were been doing business for more than five years. In spite
relatively big traders and then handled relatively larger of being self-financed they borrowed money from
volume of orange than that done by the other traders. friends, relatives and other non-institutional sources at
They had fixed business premises. Most of the Aratdar the time of need.
were independently organized and self-financed.
Value chain actors’ functions of orange
They employed both labors and other staff on daily
wage and salary basis for performing various functions. Marketing system may be thought of as the connecting
They had some permanent and temporary staffs. The link between specialized producers and consumers
Aratdar only sold the oranges to distance market (Kohls, 2005). An efficient marketing system is
(Dhaka, Chittagong etc.) through wholesaler in essential for earning fair profit for the fish farmers and
different markets those they received from Bepari for traders. Marketing functions may be defined as major
this why they used to get a commission. The Aratdar specialized activities performed in accomplishing the
sometimes used to borrow money from different bank, marketing process of concentration, equalization and
other financial institute and other non- institution dispersion (Kohls, 2005). The functions that performed
(friends and relatives and other traders) for a short by the value chain actors are described in this chapter
period in rare cases. for achieving the research objectives. The marketing
functions are buying and selling, grading, storage,
Wholesaler
transportation, financing, risk bearing and market
The wholesalers were also non-licensed traders. They information which are discussed in details with respect
were relatively medium traders like Bepari and they to the value chain actors roles and responsibilities and
handled relatively larger volume of orange than that their obligation to perform these functions.
done by other traders. They were independently
Buying and selling
organized. They had no fixed business premises. Most
of the wholesaler had no permanent shop staff. Mainly The primary objectives of buying and selling are the
the wholesaler sold oranges to the retailer at a relative negotiation in favorable terms and exchange. Both
volume. buyers and sellers constantly observe the fluctuation of
prices of goods and commodities. Buying generally
Retailer
includes the selection of goods, the determination of
The retailers were last link in the marketing of orange. quality and quantity and the selection of sources of
They were the specialized sellers who were directly supply. The activities involved in the transfer of goods
connected with the consumers. Sometimes, they are completed through buying and selling functions.
331
Marketing of orange in Bangladesh
Aratdar do the functions of negotiation between buyers business premises on receipt of commission. They do
and sellers of orange and help them at their own not take the ownership of the orange.
The study shows that mainly Bepari sell 76.43% of marketing channel. Grading facilitates sale since
their orange to wholesaler, 15% wholesaler through different sizes of orange have different prices. In this
Aratdar, and remaining 8.57% to retailer directly. study, all the actors grading their oranges on the basis
Wholesaler sells 79.75% of their oranges to retailer via of size.
Aratdar and 20.25 % to consumers directly. Retailers
Storage
sell the entire orange to ultimate consumers. Bepari of
oranges purchases 80.71% from farmers and 19.29% The storage facilities help buyers and sellers to reduce
directly from farmers through Aratdar. Consumer the wide fluctuation of prices between peak and lean
purchases 100% of oranges from the retailers in the seasons. The storage function is primarily concerned
study area (Table 1). with making goods available at the desired time and
enables traders to receive better prices for their
Grading
products. Because of high perish ability; orange
Grading is the basic function of sales transactions and requires specialized storage facilities matching the
is defined as the classification of products according to seasonal demand. Orange is transported from one place
some standards or measures (Kohls and Uhl, 2005; p. to another using basket, crate and wooden box.
314). Grading is the sorting of produce into different
Transportation
market quality which facilitates exchange by
simplifying buying and selling as it makes the sale by Transportation is a basic function of making goods
showing sample and description possible. It also available at proper place and it creates place utility.
simplifies the concentration process and makes easier Perishable goods must be moved as early as possible
and less costly the movement of goods through the from the producing center to consumer.
332
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
Table 2. Modes of transportation used by value chain actors for movement of orange
333
Marketing of orange in Bangladesh
through market price and Bepari 100 % of their orange different stages of value chain. The production and
sold through auction (Table 5). marketing costs per quintal are shown in the following
Table 6, Table 7, and Table 8. In order to estimate
Value Addition of orange by producer/farmer
gross cost per quintal all the resource uses in orange
Value Addition is mainly interpreted as the difference cultivation have been recaptured together. In the study
between the total expenses involved in making or area, the total costs of orange were estimated at Tk.
buying of a commodity and the total revenue earned 234686.13per hectare. In the study area per hectare
from its sales. Value Addition activities are mainly summation of the costs of variable inputs made total
concerned with the changes of utilities. To determine variable costs, which was Tk. 135891.55 of orange and
the addition on orange produced by the producer, the fixed cost of orange cultivation, includes land use cost
cost and return was estimated in terms of per hectare and interest on operating capital. Summation of the
and per quintal. In orange cultivation, cost of inputs costs of fixed inputs made total fixed costs, which was
like human labor, land preparation cost, seed or tree Tk. 98794.58 of orange. Total marketing cost of
planting cost, fertilizer or manure cost, insecticide and farmers, was worked out to be Tk.293.98 per quintal.
pesticide cost, and also fixed cost like land use cost Average sales price of orange received by farmers were
were required. Marketing cost also estimated at Tk.6000 per quintal.
Table 4. Packaging system of orange marketing
Basket Bamboo, Plastic and 10-12kg Farmer, Bepari, Aratdar, Wholesaler and
Wooden Retailer
Source: Field survey (2015)
The average yield of orange per hectare was estimated Gross margin was obtained by deducting total variable
at 45 quintal and the average gross return from orange cost from gross return. In the present study, gross
production was calculated by multiplying the total margin was estimated Tk. 134108.45 per hectare
amounts of produce by its prevailing market price (Table 9). Net return is very useful tool to analyze or
which was Tk. 6000 per quintal. The total gross return compute performance of enterprises. Per hectare net
was estimated Tk. 2, 70,000 per hectare (Table 9). return is calculated by subtracting gross cost from
Gross margin is the gross return over variable cost.
334
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
gross return. In this study, net return was calculated at There are different types of expenses such as loading
Tk. 22084.77 per hectare (Table 9). and unloading, transportation, basket, personal
expenses, wastage, telephone charge, aratdar’s
Value Addition and marketing costs of orange by
commission, market toll, rent. in this section,
other value chain actors
marketing cost incurred during buying and selling by
Marketing cost of orange include various expenses bepari, aratdar, wholesaler and retailer are discussed.
incurred by different functionaries for physical
movement of orange through the marketing channel.
Table 7. Average production cost of orange per hectare and per quintal
335
Marketing of orange in Bangladesh
highest amount of marketing cost was borne by Bepari On the other hand, aratdar incurred lowest marketing
followed by retailers and wholesalers. Among the cost and marketing margin and bepari incurred highest
different actors, retailer incurred highest (in (in percentage) marketing cost but adding second
percentage) value addition and net marketing margin. highest value in compare to another.
Table 8. Average marketing cost of orange per hectare and per quintal
336
Begum et al. (2016), Progressive Agriculture 27 (3): 327-338
Table 11. Value addition, marketing cost and net marketing margin of different value chain actors of orange in Tk.
per quintal (Tk. per quintal)
Actors Purchase Sales Price Gross marketing margin Marketing cost Net marketing
Price or Value addition margin
Table 12. Percentage distribution of value addition cost and profit by different value chain actors of orange
Note: Percentages of total value addition cost/net profit = Marketingcost/ Net marketingmargin
100
Total marektingcost/ Total net marektingmargin
337
Marketing of orange in Bangladesh
338