0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views16 pages

Vishal Minor Project 2

Uploaded by

Krishna Malviya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views16 pages

Vishal Minor Project 2

Uploaded by

Krishna Malviya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Similarity Report

PAPER NAME AUTHOR

Vishal Minor project 2 Vishal Kudare

WORD COUNT CHARACTER COUNT

1185 Words 7895 Characters

PAGE COUNT FILE SIZE

13 Pages 470.0KB

SUBMISSION DATE REPORT DATE

Apr 25, 2024 1:22 PM GMT+5:30 Apr 25, 2024 1:22 PM GMT+5:30

14% Overall Similarity


The combined total of all matches, including overlapping sources, for each database.
8% Internet database 2% Publications database
Crossref database Crossref Posted Content database
12% Submitted Works database

Excluded from Similarity Report


Bibliographic material

Summary
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Deep learning-based image classification algorithms, including those using Generative


Adversarial Networks (GANs), have been developed to enhance classification accuracy,
particularly in healthcare applications.

Evaluation metrics like precision, recall, and confidence thresholds are essential for assessing
model performance.

The development and evaluation of image classification systems for automated tasks involve
the use of automated optimization schemes, deep learning models, and robust machine
learning tools. These techniques enhance image classification accuracy and enable businesses
and developers to create precise image recognition models for various applications.

The development and evaluation of image classification systems play a pivotal role in various
fields, ranging from medical diagnosis to autonomous driving. These systems employ
sophisticated algorithms to analyze and interpret visual data, enabling them to categorize
9
images into predefined classes or labels accurately. This introduction aims to provide an
overview of the significance, challenges, and methodologies involved in the development and
evaluation of image classification systems.

7
1
Significance: With the exponential growth of digital imagery in diverse domains, such as
healthcare, security, agriculture, and entertainment, the demand for robust image
classification systems has surged. These systems not only facilitate efficient data organization
but also enable automation and decision-making processes, thereby enhancing productivity
and performance across various industries.

Challenges: Despite significant advancements in image classification algorithms, several


challenges persist. These challenges include variability in image appearance due to factors
like lighting conditions, occlusions, viewpoint changes, and image noise. Additionally, the
presence of large-scale datasets with diverse classes necessitates the development of scalable
and efficient algorithms capable of handling complex visual data.

Methodologies: The development and evaluation of image classification systems involve


several key methodologies:

Data Preprocessing: This phase involves tasks such as data augmentation, normalization, and
feature extraction, which are crucial for enhancing the robustness and generalization
capability of the model.

5
Cross-Validation: Cross-validation techniques such as k-fold cross-validation and stratified
cross-validation are used to validate the model's performance and ensure its robustness
against overfitting.

2
Scope of Research: The development and evaluation of image classification systems present a
rich field for research and innovation. Current research directions include exploring novel
network architectures, designing efficient algorithms for handling large-scale datasets,
addressing domain-specific challenges, and integrating multimodal information for enhanced
classification accuracy.

3
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE SURVEY

On the development and evaluation of image classification systems for automated tasks
reveals several key aspects.

Firstly, class-incremental learning (class-IL) is a critical aspect of future learning systems,


aiming to efficiently use resources, reduce memory usage, and learn in a manner more similar
to human learning

Class-IL is distinct from task-IL and is evaluated based on properties such as maturity,
scalability, and exemplar-freeness

Secondly, generative adversarial networks (GANs) are used in intelligent image classification
systems for color image analysis, particularly for coastal driftwood images

GANs learn a generative model 0to describe data generation using probabilistic models and
adversarial settings

Thirdly, automated data augmentation (AutoDA) algorithms are crucial for image
classification tasks, particularly for deep learning models

AutoDA algorithms are used to improve model performance, and the most commonly used
datasets for this purpose are CIFAR-10/100, SVHN, and ImageNet
8
Fourthly, the study of automated optimization-based deep learning models for image
classification tasks involves investigating hyperparameter association and proposing
hyperparameter val

4
This paper presents a comprehensive study on the development and evaluation of image
classification systems. We investigate state-of-the-art methodologies, analyze their strengths
and limitations, and propose novel approaches to address existing challenges. By exploring

Moreover, the availability of large-scale annotated datasets has played a crucial role in the for
training and evaluation. Pretrained models, trained on these datasets, serve advancement of
image classification systems. ImageNet, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and COCO are among the
widely used datasets as valuable resources for transfer learning, enabling effective
classification even with limited labeled data.

Despite the progress, challenges persist in image classification, including robustness to


variations in lighting, viewpoint, and occlusions, as well as mitigating biases present in the
training data. Recent research has focused on addressing these challenges through techniques
such as data augmentation, adversarial training, domain adaptation, and attention
mechanisms.

Evaluation of image classification systems involves assessing their accuracy, efficiency, and

model interpretability and explainability have gained attention to ensure transparency and
trustworthiness in real-world applications.

5
CHAPTER 3: METHODOLOGY

1
Data Collection and Preprocessing: The first step in developing an image classification
system involves acquiring a diverse and representative dataset. This dataset should
encompass a wide range of images from different categories relevant to the application
1
domain. Preprocessing techniques such as resizing, normalization, and data augmentation are
applied to enhance the quality and variability of the dataset, thereby improving the robustness
of the classification model.
2
Feature Extraction: In this stage, relevant features are extracted from the preprocessed images
6
to represent their visual characteristics effectively. Traditional methods such as Histogram of
Oriented Gradients (HOG) or Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) may be used for
11
feature extraction. Alternatively, deep learning techniques like convolutional neural networks
4
(CNNs) can automatically learn discriminative features directly from raw pixel values,
eliminating the need for manual feature engineering.

6
7
8
CHAPTER 4: RESULT

3
Iterative Improvement: Based on the analysis, researchers may iterate on the model

9
3
architecture, data preprocessing techniques, or hyperparameters to improve performance
further. This iterative process continues until satisfactory results are achieved.

Documentation and Reporting: Finally, the findings of the development and evaluation
process are documented in a research paper, thesis, or technical report. This documentation
10
includes details about the dataset, model architecture, training procedure, evaluation metrics,
and insights gained from the analysis. It allows other researchers to reproduce the results and
build upon the work.

10
CHAPTER 5 : CONCLUSION
Conclus ion

Insights Gained: Discuss the insights gained from the analysis of the results. This could
include understanding which classes/categories the model excelled at classifying and which
ones it struggled with. Identify any patterns or trends observed in the misclassified images.

Implications and Applications: Explore the implications of the research findings for various
applications. Discuss how the developed image classification system could be applied in real-
world scenarios, such as medical diagnosis, autonomous driving, surveillance, or
environmental monitoring.

Future Directions: Highlight potential avenues for future research and improvements to the
image classification system. This could involve experimenting with different model
architectures, exploring advanced data augmentation techniques, or collecting more diverse
and representative datasets.

Contributions to the Field: Summarize the contributions of the study to the field of computer
vision and image processing. Emphasize any novel methodologies, insights, or techniques
introduced during the development and evaluation of the image classification system.

Conclusion Statement: Provide a concluding statement that reinforces the significance of the
2
research findings and underscores the importance of continued research in this area

11
REFERENCES
1. ChatGPT (openai.com)

2. YouTube

3. Intelligent personal assistants: A systematic literature review - ScienceDirect

4. scikit-learn: machine learning in Python — scikit-learn 1.4.2 documentation

5. Getting started with Keras

6. Introducing the new Bing. The AI-powered assistant for your search. (microsoft.com)

7. LSTM layer (keras.io)

8. sklearn.metrics.confusion_matrix — scikit-learn 1.4.2 documentation

12
9.

TURNITIN PLAGIARISM REPORT

Please Inserta Scanned Copy of the Front pagesduly signed by the Candidate,
Supervisor, Departmental Turnitrin Coordinator, and HoD with Seal

13
Similarity Report

14% Overall Similarity


Top sources found in the following databases:
8% Internet database 2% Publications database
Crossref database Crossref Posted Content database
12% Submitted Works database

TOP SOURCES
The sources with the highest number of matches within the submission. Overlapping sources will not be
displayed.

International University - VNUHCM on 2023-06-03


1 2%
Submitted works

University of Ulster on 2023-05-10


2 2%
Submitted works

Aspen University on 2023-07-09


3 2%
Submitted works

Manchester Metropolitan University on 2023-05-12


4 1%
Submitted works

ojs.uma.ac.id
5 1%
Internet

atlantis-press.com
6 1%
Internet

mitsgwalior on 2024-04-23
7 <1%
Submitted works

repository.tia.ac.tz
8 <1%
Internet

Sources overview
Similarity Report

ijraset.com
9 <1%
Internet

Lovely Professional University on 2024-04-10


10 <1%
Submitted works

Morgan State University on 2023-04-25


11 <1%
Submitted works

Sources overview

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy