0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views10 pages

FEM - Module

Finite element method

Uploaded by

Krent School
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views10 pages

FEM - Module

Finite element method

Uploaded by

Krent School
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10
; todinle $ HAPTER 11 Lee “ ptroduction to the Finite‘, slement Method eae Gn Aw 8y k, 2 0 ts * Sar Oe ag © bere, ky Fly o & tt Sy Gee oy S hae, wasn 2 ve discussing the finite element method, we determine the stiffness matrix of sim by considering th ple frame cqatures bY cor em the structure as an assemblage of structural elements. With the forces and gonentsat the ends of the elements known from structural theory, the joints between the elements are saiched for compatibility of displacements and the forces and moments at the joints are established ‘imposing the condition of equilibrium, Inthe finite element method, the me procedure is followed, but in a more systematic way for computer calculation. Although s ith few elements can be analyzed simply by the method valined initially, the “bookkeeping” for a large structure of many elements would soon overcome the ssence of the analyst. In the finite element method, element coordinates and forces are transformed ‘oglabal coordinates and the stiffness matrix of the entire structure Is presented in a global system efcommon orientation. The accuracy obtainable from the finite element method depends on being able to duplicate the sation mode shapes. Using only one finite element bets rsults for the first lowest mode because the sta deflection curve is a good approximation to the bast dynamic mode shape. For higher mod ‘everal elements are necessary between structural sit, This leads to large matrices for which a computer 18 essential in solving for the eigenvalues ‘sdeigenvectors of the system. This chapter introduces the reader 10 the basie ideas of the finite clement method and also ‘cludes the development of the corresponding mass matrix to complete the equations of motion for cents for the axial and bear elements are di ed here. d to other (exts. Qs ae t ey Deg MA FLEXIBILITY INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS ad either in terms of the stiffness or the flexibility n for the normal mode vibration in terms of the uetures con structural joints or comers gives good Sedynamic problem. Only structural elem Fore treatment of plates and shells, the reader Is referre Tie castic behavior of a system can be exPpret ® far, we have written the equations of MOOD itn a) ol pK DIXD = Oh i) hepato r) Collen hey E \ feted ee > Cm KETO > Scanned with CamScanner (bid -SEICI+AW bd o 314 Theory of Vibration with Applications (-Weh &) CT =o sed in terms of the displacement Fe ke Inthe stiffness formutat the force is expr ; 4~ 364 © RP = IKI a The displacement is here Written in opm, (7 FRambnlit om ba 2 ae eee Alpen mr wie FS C0 kya) |x Ge tar) ny ily determined by remultplyng Fy. CF ly thy The flexibility is the inverse of the stiflness. The equation of motion in terms of the lexibility ise by AT! = fal: qe (<0? [al[M] + D(X) = (0) (Mtg ios) Dien & '® = 1 unit matrix, The choice as 10 which approach to adopt depends on the problem. Some problems a ued on the inverse propei AL vibration. & ai Ire mote. s of stiffness, and for others, the flexibility approach is desirable 'y of one or the other is an important concept that is used throughout the theory of. easily The flexibility matrix writter terms of its coefficients ay is ! ot we ¥ xy a an a3 fi an M2 P=] a a2 a3 h (ILLS) x3 a1 432° 433 A The flesibiliy influence coefficient ay is defined as the displacement at i due to a unit force applied at j with all other forces equal to zero. Thus, the first column of the foregoing matix renpesents the displacements corresponding to fi = 1 and fs = fs = 0. The second column equal to the displacements for fs = | and fj 0, and so on. Example 11.1.1 x Determine the fesibility matrix for the three-spring system of Fig, WAL 5 Gu , bo bw Lewin or Ma . a ~ 4 yoru Vm FIGURE 11.1.1, Solution By applying a unit force fj = 1 at (1) with fy = = 0, the displace; for the frst column of the flexibility matrix 2 fh = O.the displacements, x}. Gu Ge ayy " Mh 0 0 Ay Sue ayy aps vty 00 xy ky 0 0 Gat Ou ous ' Here springs Xp and k3 are unstretche and are displaced e Next, apply forces fj = 0, fy Moo Vea, = 0 toa ih ation (4) " ok a 0 rn menace, [beans] . ost oflo ; Gre +r st ~ te! Scanned with CamScanner introduc Vion to the Finite Flement Method 315 sane te Hl FACES HIMSA Anaph ws nile Manner, for MeoueH Ay and ky, nd 109 A= fy Wand sp, Iwek 14) 1s aistretched ) , have wvyet Hat " oo pM Ie 2 vo jo ‘3 4 “ oo ee da complete flexibility matrix is The comp y matt mow he sum ot het “ 1 “1 i (3). My iu ei swe the symmetry of the mattix about the diagon: a fample 11.1.2 ww taternine the lexibility matrix for the system shown in Fig, 11.2 (3s oo) es a3 DUNE a? 4 = wer m2, rs q! ke Ton sy < 2k k wr? by | am m wf on —*, —% —x, Gaz dade 3 FIGURE 11.1.2. Onteasa, 4 k Bw Ww 2 =. are “2k 4212042 tA Out ag Solution We have here ky = 2k, k2 and kj = k, and the flexibility matrix from, Example 11.1.1 becomes sft = mee shar 2+] 05 05 05 — ve OS U Bee 2 gallos 1s 15 (Ce, Klos 1s 25 aff or Ut ey Shs 2 ay 2 Sample 11.1.3 Daermine the flexibility influence coefficients for stations (1), own in Fig. 11.1.3, (2), and (3) of the uniform cantilever beam. an be determinied by placing unit loads at (1), (2), and (3) as shown, ig the arca moment method,! the deflection at the various ion in question. For example, the value of Solution The influence coefficients ¢ an “4 calculatin; 1 these points. By usi 1g the deflections at : “tions is equal to the moment of the M. EI area about the posit 215 ayy is found from Fig, 1.1.3 as follows: a2 = Fy Scanned with CamScanner ications 316 Theory of Vibration with Applicatic ae ay ay FIGURE 11.1.3. The other values (determined as before) are an =a any =a 413 = 431 and the symmetry about the diagonal should be noted, Example 11.1.4 ‘The flexibility influence coetlicients can be used to set bearing at one end with a force P anda moment Af The deflection and stope at the free up the equations of a flexible shalt supported by a athe other end, las shown in Fig. 114. end is UP + ayM ul O=ayP + ani FIGURE 11.1.4, Scanned with CamScanner ; ee Introd | ction to the Finite Element Method 317 | | FIGURE 11.1.5. Demonstration gyroscope. (Courtesy of UCSB Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory.) pe expressed by the matrix equation y]_fan af P > faj-Ea alte] ain uence coefficients in this equation are (Ls) B a= 3EI m2 =a a ing the problem ofthe gyroscopic whirl ‘and A/ in this ease would be replaced Troment of the spinning wheel, By including the flexibility 1 problem can be examined (see Prob. > 9). spe in gimbals. The mass distribution of the wheel jon other than that of the symmettic wheel ant M/ shown in Fig. HL. d offer a basis for sol ‘The equation presented here coul an overhanging shaft. P spinning wheel fixed to the end of he inertia force and the gyroscopic ‘be supporting bearing, a still more genera Figure 11.1.5 shows @ demonstration gyFoscePe “stable to obtain general moment of inertla configar in the simple inertia force P and the gyroscope momel co Aarweh Rupa ure, and 1. 12 RECIPROCITY THEOREM system, ey = > FO" the proof ofthis theorem, we ing is # followed by j andl then by re the onde i he work d rendent of the onder of ‘ciprocity theorem states that 1" eof hal Jone is indeps de wer the work done by forces fi and fy WOE ize ou Teverse, ing Reciprocity results when We 1p? 1/2 applyin a fj tiee work done by f 18 eu However, _ By applying f,, he work done is Bea BY om a Ft A bc ai eer tole J the addition’ wth € J a ice further eae ‘yf a Ziv Ss rf canned with CamScanrfer Gol y — 318 Theory of Vibration with Applications hy A wn total work done is 3 1 i Peay + fr ain + aiihhi , ® the total work done is i the order of loading, in whieh ease the (08 fe now reverse the order of loading 4 jo a " Lea t we it abl Apa hy J Because the work doni athe two cases must be equal we find that cis (ot ay ay = a Example 11.2.1 Figure 11.2.1 showsan overhanging beam with P first applied at | and then at 2, In Fig. 11.2.1(a), he atdis dees, yy = ay1P In Fig, 11.2.1(b), the deflection at 1 is yr =a Because a2 = «24,¥1 will equal y2, Le. fora linear system, the deflection at 2, due to 2 load at I seq the deflection at 1 when the same load is applied at 2 FIGURE 11.2.1. 11.3 STIFFNESS INFLUENCE COEFFICIENTS The stfiness matrix writen in terms of the influence coefficients f ents ky is fi : fh }= ' : h 5 The elements of the stiffness I matrix have the 0, the forees at 1, 2, and 3 that are a following interpretation. Ifx, = 1.080875 are ky, ky, and 3) in the e e a I first cota te4 to maintain this displacement according 1 Fie Column. Similarly, the forces ff, and fs required to "=" Scanned with CamScanner Introduction to the Finite Element Method 319 configuration 1 = 0.2 = 1.0, and x3 = 0 are ki2.kr2, and fy2 inthe second column eo efor establishing the stiffness elements of any column is to set the displacement sje ge at column to unity with all other displacements equal to zero and measure the re ont at each station. i ot en apie tt 3.1 shows (3 re OF system. Determine the stffiess matrix and write its equation of mi m Lv] m, mM Mm; ww} t,, ty, ty, FIGURE 11.3.1. pepe with xy = Landxy = x3 = 0. The forces are now h fe Forte last colurnn of &’, let x3 = 1 and xy = x = 0. The forces are fakth=bs ‘Testtess marx can now be written as (tk) ke 0 K ky (in ths) 3 0. hs is tha) Riis, ‘station of motion becomes 0 x fi m0 0 % ath) kh Is m pak Om % b+ -h (ath) -8 a [" m2 a i | + [ - ie wrk dls h © scanned with OKEN Scanner | __ SEVERAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM SYSTEM | 323 If r=s then Eqn. (6.5.8) becomes, (XY IMIIX],=M, (say) en(6.5.11) and (XY, [KX], = K, (say) (6.5.12) e ® M, and K, are referred as the generalized mass and generalized stiffness matrices respectively. ® M, and K, are actually (X} matrices and above equations are used only to determine the single elements of these matrices. For degree of freedom system the orthogonality principle is es my; (x;), (%)), = (6.5.13) when, r+ sit is principal mode of vibration of the system. ‘The expressions obtained in Eqn. (6.5.9, (6.5.10) and (6.5.13) are the mathematical conditions of orthogonality of the normal modes. However, in certain cases of 2-degree and 3-degree freedom systems, the normal modes will be physically to be perpendicular to one another. 5, m, {(x;),P =M, 5.14) ‘The orthogonality principle may be considered to be a fundamental property of vibrating systems having two or more degrees of freedom. Its importance lies in practical calculations of natural frequencies. 6.6 MATRIX ITERATION METHOD With the help ofthis method the natural frequencies and corresponding mode shapes are determined. Use of influence coefficients i made in the analysis. The method can best be understood by soloing the problem of Fig, 6.5 by matrix iteration method. MAL, 2008 ; P.U. 85) SOLUTION. The equations for the above system in terms of influence coefficients can be written as xy =a 4inx, OF + ayy2mx, OF + a,,m, o 4m xy = ayy Ax, 0 + yy2mxy WF + Ayymxy al 2 2 2 y= Ay, Ax, oF + agy2mrxy O + AgyMIxy Influence coefficients are = My 2m = ay => fl 3k Fig, 6.5 ie , ofan ER . Scanned with CamScanner 324] | MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS Substituting these terms into above equations, we get Am. 2 8M gd Am, oo 4m m , xy =A x, 0? 4 Bx, ot 4 My, x=e— + omy, wo tty ot ; a 1 3 Te ar xe 3k 3k 3k Am 4 by, 7m xo? + 2 xy? Be 1 ta 2 GES X= This can be written in matrix form as Fs 42 1)]fa, 5 ; 1 ape Gea 4 X %y 48 7]\(x; To start with the iteration process, let us assume x 1 Xp p= y2 a Xd o x5 3 @ First iteration % 2 f421)7{1 u 1 om @ oy f= SM gg a flab o2'm| 99 |-2'mayloor x Be 5 3k (1) x 48 7|(3 41 3.73, Now assume x 1 x, $={291 x3} [3.73 @ Second iteration x > f421)7[ 1 > [1355 1 X Se 48 291 Sere 42.2 |= 2 13,55)/3.11 xy 48 7}(373 5339 3.94 421){1 1 48 4]/311 (14.16) 3.15 48 7]\[394 3.98 4217/1 14.28 1 48 4 }) 315} 2 M4512 |- 2°" a4 2813.15 487} {398 : 3.99, Scanned with CamScanner SEVERAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM SYSTEM The ratio obtained in the fourth iteration is very close to the initial value, 5° 1 : 1 3.15 } = rt) 3.15 3.99 3.99 or ue = mo=1 > o 3k 14.28 m 1 K rad/ sec, mode shape } 3.16 4 3_k = |< = 458 OV T428 Calculation of Higher Modes by Orthogonality Principle It is known that the directional shape of system can be represented by the linear supér- position of its various normal modes. For the case of 3-degree of freedom system, we can write (XJ=C, + G a + Cs 5 where C,, Cy and C; are constants. i) a and {x}=] x, } which is assumed deflection of the system. x3 Second Mode Firstly we introduce the orthogonality relationship, (xy, (MIX), =0 where r¢s Pre multiplying Eqn. (i) by (X}, (MI (XH, [MIX = Cy (1 (MIG), + Co ON IMI). + Cy (Xh (M13 OX), (MIE =C, 20 (MI), +0 (as per Orthogonality principle) In order to obtain the second mode, we will eliminate the first normal mode in Eqn. (i) by putting C, =0, we get (x), (MI {X}=0 which can also be written as : m 0 0 Tfx %,%3,] 0 m 0 |} x, |=0 0 0 mlx dsm 1 +a) Maxe +5), mMyxs =O ii) 3 or 2, (x,), mx, =0 Scanned with CamScanner

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy