Unit 3
Unit 3
SCENARIOS ON LITERACY
Structure
3.0 Introduction
3.1 Objectives
3.2 Global Scenario
3.2.1 Need for Literacy
3.2.2 Literacy Initiative for Empowerment (LIFE)
3.3 Regional Scenario
3.3.1 Differences in Regional Literacy Rates
3.3.2
'
3.0 INTRODUCTION
Unit 3 PI-ovideslearners with an overview of the state of literacy world wide. It a
discusses the cision and need for literacy especially in contemporary knowledge
societies, and the necessity of working for literacy for one's well-being. It guides
you to develop your own definition of literacy, describe different forms of literacy, i
and to apply your understanding of adult literacy learning to global, regional and
national scenarios. It is assumed that as an adult educator you are already aware
of the national scenario on literacy in India. For example, you are of course
familiar with the facts that starting from Mahatma Gandhi's basic education in
1937 (when he called for a coordinated teaching-learning process of hand, body
and soul and learning by doing) and the Kothari Commission Report in 1966, to
the Education for All (EFA) Declaration of Government of India in 2005 - all
a
emphasized the importance of literacy. This is why Unit 3 attempts to lead you
to build your own perspective of literacy in the light of global, regional and
national developments to achieve universal literacy.
You may already know that various stages of evolution in explaining and defining
literacy as per the needs and demands of the period, have taken place and they
have been influenced by academic research, international policy agendas and
national priorities from time to time. You also know that a commonly held
viewpoint is that literacy means developing or acquisition of reading and writing
skills and numeric skill. Unit 3 provides more value addition to your perspective
of literacy.
After studying this unit, you are expected to be able to: Global, Regional and
National Scenarios on
Explain the concept of literacy and its importance at the global, regional Literacy
and national levels;
Explain the need for literacy;
Identify the various forms and types of literacy;
Apply various approaches to implement adult literacy programmes; and
Develop your own understanding of issues related to literacy.
-
GLOBAL SCENARIO - - - - - - -
You are an adult educator. As you know, Professor Amartya Sen, the 1998 Nobel
laureate in Economics, recalled in his message at the celebrations for 2002
International Literacy Day, "There is an old Bengali saying that knowledge is a
very special commodity: the more you give away, the more you have left.
Imparting education not only enlightens the receiver, but also broadens the giver
- the teachers, the parents, the friends."
Some questions arise in the mind. Is Amartya Sen referring to adult educators?
Do you have confidence in the role of adult education as it exists today? Or, is it
necessary to go beyond its current status? With a co-learner, discuss the following
quotation from the speech by John Daniel (2003). What does he mean by these
statements?
You may not agree with what John Daniel has to say about adult educators. In
fact, I too do not agree with him. All the same let us try and make out what he
meant when he spoke the above words about adult educators. Do they ring a bell
in our minds? Is there some truth lurking behind them? About twenty Delhi-
based adult educators participated in a workshop, held in January 2006 at
Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi. Well, some participants looked bored
7A
if not boring, while some were making a show of being keen, serious and Global, Regional and
National Scenarios on
committed. In their responses to questions about contemporary social reality, Literacy
many of them were backward-looking and paternalistic. Adult educators have
been described to me as a 'lazy lot' who would not be up to 'reflecting' and
answering the 'check your progress' questions. So may be John Daniel was just
being blunt and calling a spade a spade. Or, he may be simply trying to shake us
up and exhort us to take up the challenge of universal literacy. Whichever way it
is, I suppose the test is right here. Let us find out how many learners of Unit 3
actually work on defining literacy.
You can also compare John Daniel's statements with those of H. S. Bhola (2005:
67). He is well known among adult educators in India and abroad and he said,
Adult educators in India have to understand Globalization in general and
how it has influenced Indian politics, economy and health services,
education-and adult education-in particular. ... As activists, Indian
adult educators must work to ensure that the position regarding its political
economy India is indeed protected; and that the state is not allowed to
withdraw from its functions that have traditionally become a part of the
social contract between the state and its citizens. They must re-commit
themselves to adult education and lifelong education and press on the
state to allocate enough resources to revive the objectives and operations
of the National Literacy Mission and design and launch new programmes
and projects of adult education for poverty alleviation and sustainable
development.
Do Bhola's words inspire you to carry forward your professional pursuits with
new ideas about adult literacy learning? Alternatively, would you like to form
your own perspective on global, regional and national scenario on literacy? Let
us proceed to initiate the process whereby you construct your own perspective.
It is well known that in the international arena UNESCO started supporting the
spread of adult education as part of a concerted effort to advance basic education
after the Second World War. The first global survey of adult literacy, covering
over sixty countries, was published in 1957. By then the world leaders and policy
makers realizkd that education and literacy could better enable individuals to
participate in and benefit from a modernizing economy. The second-half of the
twentieth century witnessed international policy community stressing on the role
of literacy in economic growth and national development especially in newly
independent countries. In the mid-1960s, in trying to cope with the development
hopes of Third World nations, economic functionality came to be the focus,
though mention was also made of social, and,-cultural needs of human beings.
The Teheran Conference of 1965 asked that functional literacy - now defined as
economic functionality - be in the centre of global efforts. The Teheran Conference
Report (1965) accepted functional literacy "as an essential element in overall
development ... closely linked to economic and social priorities and to present
and future manpower needs".
In 1978, the General Conference of UNESCO adopted a definition of functional
literacy which is still in use as 'A person is functionally literate who can engage
in all those activities in which literacy is required for effective functioning of his
(or her) group, community and also for enabling him (or her) to continue to use
reading, writing and calculation for his (or her) own and the community's
development.' 75
Development of Adult In 1958 at the General Conference of UNESCO the standard definition of literacy
Education
emerged which is: 'A person is literate who can with understanding both read
and write a short simple statement on his (or her) everyday life.' The definition
of literacy sometimes extends to basic arithmetic and other life skills. This
definition became a yardstick for measuring literacy in national censuses. As
you are well aware, this understanding of literacy which emphasized on an
exclusively skills-based view captured the attention of researchers during 1960s
and 1970s. Further elaborated to use and apply skills in meaningful ways, the
notion of functional literacy gained ground on the basis of linking literacy to
productivity and overall socio-economic development. To use literacy in social
and cultural context has also been a perspective among recent developments.
Literacy has also been viewed by many educators as an active process of learning
involving social awareness and critical reflection which in turn would promote
social change. The Brazilian educator Paulo Freire advocated integrated notions
of active learning within a particular socio-cultural set up, as he wrote: 'Every
reading of the word is preceded by a reading of the world'.
But, some of you may say that in order to cope with the Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) age of the twenty-first century we need to
have something more than the basic skills for survival. Isn't that so? The answer
to this question will depend on how you wish to define literacy. Some of you
may have come across the concept of 'multiple literacy' which is related to
technological, health, information, media, visual, scientific and other contexts
and more suited for life in the twenty-first century. Emphasis is placed not only
on reading and writing, but also on skills and practices relevant to the changing
demands of community life. With the emphasis on adult literacy skills in evolving
labor markets and knowledge-based societies during the 1980s and 1990s, the
Jometian Conference at Thailand in 1990 for Education for All (EFA) placed
literacy within the broader context of meeting the basic learning needs of every
child, youth and adult. It stated that these needs comprise both essential learning
tools (such as literacy, oral expression, numeric, and problem solving) and the
basic learning content (such as knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes) required
by human beings to be able to survive, to develop their full capacities, to live
and work in dignity, to participate fully in development, to improve the quality
of their lives, to make informed decisions, and to continue learning.' This concept
of basic learning needs in terms of learning tools and learning content is invariably
subject to interpretationby implementing agencies. In this sense, no one definition
of literacy can reflect all its aspects. Even the EFA Global Monitoring Report's
matter-of-fact definition of literacy does not lend itself to a universal and standard
measurement of literacy. Also in normal process of learning one measures
achievement by carrying out and Completing a task, while in formal system of
adult literacy learning there are formal tests to measure success. In a way we
may speak of the need to enlarge the scope of externally planned and assisted
adult literacy learning to include informal learning whereby literacy learning
becomes a part of our social skills learning.
The above approach to learning alludes to theconcept of lifelong learning that
has now become the buzz word in discourse on education. As a result many
adult education departments in educational institutions of higher education have
even converted themselves into departments of lifelong learning. So you have
now 'lifelong learning discourse' (See Rogers, 2002 and 2003) in which adult
literacy learning has to be contextualized in terms of adult learners' perception
76 of themselves and their self-created goals.
Global, Regional and
Check Your Progress National Scenarios on
Notes: a) Space given below the question is for writing your answer. Literacy
b) Check your answer with the one given at the end of this unit under
"Answers to Check Your Progress".
1) With the above background information that many of you may already
possess, systematize your ideas on literacy and write down your definition
of literacy in one page.
..................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................
............................................. ....................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
L
In sub-section 3.2.1, let us now look at the global scenario on literacy in the
perspective that you may have begun to form about the need for literacy.
Given the fact that literacy is a low priority on the development and the education
agendas in many countries and consequently is a weak link in the global movement
towards achieving Education for All (EFA), we may rather consider a model of
multiple adult literacies whereby participants engage primarily in different
activities and learn reading, writing and numeric in the context of those activities.
The following statements reflect a similar view.
"Literacy is not a pre-condition for the spread of some form of basic knowledge
however much it would be facilitated by literacy." (UNICEF, 1990: 53-54).
"Literacy is neither an entry requirement, nor necessary for the clientele to learn.
... the facilitation of adult and continuing learning can be provided without first
teaching learners to read and write." (Bas, 1991, cited in Lynch, 1997: 90).
In view of the idea of multiple literacies, let us have a critical look at Literacy
Initiative for Empowerment (LIFE) which is a global strategic framework for
the implementation of the United Nations Literacy Decade (UNLD 2003-201 2).
It is supported and led by UNESCO. As an integral component of EFA, UNLD
provides both a platform and an impetus for achieving all six goals of the Dakar
Framework for Action, promoting literacy under the banner 'Literacy as Freedom'.
The UNLD reaffirms 'that literacy for all is at the heart of basic education for all
and that creating literate environments and societies is essential for achieving
the goals of eradicating poverty, reducing child mortality, curbing population
growth, achieving gender equality and ensuring sustainable development, peace
and democracy' (United Nations, 2002).
-J
50% and more
1 30% to <50%
@ lO%to<30%
Less than 10%
_) Data not available
Source: UNESCO Institute for Statistics estimate. July 2002
This situation brings home the important concern of training adult educators so
that they can improve the current growth of literacy in our country. In order to
operationalize plans for creating a literate society, the initiative of training adult
educators is as important in India as it is in Sub-Saharan Africa. It is so because
new developments of importance in adult education have appeared and it is time
to make sure that we do not miss them. Adult educators cannot afford to project
the image of 'being boring, sanctimonious, backward looking abd paternalist'
(Daniel, 2003) and not notice new developments occurring in their field of
activities.
Literacy meets a wide spectrum of individual needs and development goals.
Your definition of literacy (hopefully already worked out by you in Activity 1.2)
most likely reflects a much broader understanding of literacy where literacy stands
for several types of skills. The concept of 'multiple literacies' can be used if you
think it fits your description of literacy.
The term 'literacy' is often used as a metaphor, as we say computer literacy or
environmental literacy or legal literacy or gender literacy, etc. Here, literacy is
Development of Adult used more in the sense of skill. Is literacy something different for adult educators?
Education
Does it mean only the ability to read and write texts? Is literacy the same as
'awareness'? Is it not that one can be aware but not literate or one can be literate
and not aware? To answer these questions we need to consider and be clear
about the discourse on various approaches to literacy. FOPthis purpose you may
put your thinking antennae up and look into the current and previous practices of
operationalizing the concept of literacy. For achieving tangible results, you would
need to look into objectives of adult literacy learning programmes and the
measures for deciding on their success.
The following examples show that literacy is important but not a pre-requisite. It
can take place as and when required.
These trends and proiections give us reason for hope and optimism regarding
progress In literacy. Though gentlet dill'erence\ in literacy rates are more nurked
among adults, there is now almost no gender difference in literacy rates of 15-24
year olds in many regions of the world. I-Iowcver, the absolute numbers \ ~ f
illiterates remain obstinately high. Of an estimated figure of 875 million illiterate
adults in the world in the year 2000, nearly two-thirds were women. It has been
projected that the fastest increases in literacy rates among adult women will take
place in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Arab States.
In the light of above discussion, it is not tenable to hold the view that 'literacy'
can be 'given' neutrally and its social in~pactcan be measured afterwards.
Traditional literacy programmes, based on autonomous model of literacy, have
largely failed because they did not use appropriate intellectual tools to understand
the diversity of literacy practices around the world and did not design literacy
programmes to suit the particular needs of adult learners. You can argue that
organizing a literacy programme is to be a part of a power relationship and how
adult learners take hold of such a programme depends on socio-cultural practices
and not just on pedagogic and cognitive factors.
Adult educators need to address, in a literacy programme. all the questions about
power relation among the participants. about the resources and their sources,
about choices available to learners for learning one literacy rather than another
. type of literacy, about how learners challenge the dorninal~tpoints of view of
literacy. It is worth asking about what literacy means to the concerned adults and
which social contexts the use to drive meanings of literacy. Often. one has come
across the fact that even non-literate persons engage in literacy activities ant1
therefore the dividing line bet~veenliteratei non-literate i~ not all that obvlous
(see Doronilla. 1 996).
'r11e new concept5 of 'literacy events' and 'literacy practices' have been commonly
wed in New Literacy Studiel. Heath (1982: 50) has explained the concept of
'literacy event' as 'any occasion in which a piece of writing is integral to the
nature of the participants' interactions and their interpretive processes'. Street
(1984: 1) has elaborated the term 'literacy practices' as a means of focusing
upon 'the social practices and conceptions of reading and writing' and also that
the term includes the social models of literacy that participants bring to bear
upon those events and that give meaning to them.
The questions posed about literacy practices make one feel like going further
into the complex nature of debates around literacy issues. Bringing enlightened
perspective5 to what an adult educator can do for achieving universal litera~yi \
possible by questioning one's own understanding of the nature arid meaning ot
literacy.
84
3.4.1 Literacy Practices in India Global, Regional and
National Scenarios on
If we put the official view of managing and funding literacy programmes vis-A- Literacy
vis the perspective of our discussion on different approaches to literacy, we need
to reflect on the nature of literacy programmes and their objectives. This reflection
enables us to make our own choices 011 literacy practices initiatives in adult
learning activities. We need to think about implicati.c,nsof adopting the approach
that treats literacy as the ability to read and write. Will it lead to adult literacy
programmes with text books and adults being taught to read and write in ways
similar to those in which children are taught in schools?
Check Your Progress
Notes: a) Space given below the question is for writing your answer.
b) Check your answer with the one given at the end of this unit under
"Answers to Check Your Progress".
3) Is it possible to take another approach to literacy practice in which there
is no 'task-conscious learning', instead we have 'learning-conscious
learning'? What is the implication of this approach'! Will it start from
what adults know and what they can add to learning sessions?
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
1
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
Being a signatory to World Declaration. India's commitment for EFA, and
particularly for primary education and adult literacy became evident from Ccntral
Advisory Board of Education (CABE), the national policy making body's (a)
endorgement of EFA goals. as underlined in India's National Policy on Education
(NPE) 1986 and its Programme of Action (as revised in 1992); and (b) approval
for accepting external funding for primary and elementary education programmes
(MHRD-NIEPA, 2000). Kerala with the highest literacy rate (90.86 per cent)
and Bihar the lowest (47.00 per cent) represent two extremes of the Indian scenario
on literacy. Social indicator like life expectancy at birth (2001-2006) is 71.61 for
males and 75 for females in Kerala while in Bihar, it is 65.66 for males and
64.79 for females. Similarly another social indicator, infant mortality per 1,000
85
Development of Adult live births is only 10 in Kerala against 61 in Bihar. Also birth rate (per 1,000) is
Education
16.9 in Kerala against 30.9 in Bihar and death rate (per 1.000) is 6.4 in Kerala
against 7.9 in Bihar. All these indicators highlight the social differences in the 4
two states and the differences show that literacy is the key to improving the
quality of life (see Sen,2005 ). The literacy rates in different states for 1981 and 1
!
2001 reflect considerable variance throughout the country. Leaving aside a few 1
states at the top and bottom, most of the states are either a little above or below
the national average.
With this national scenario, adult educators in India would certainly wish to re-
think the current practices in the field of adult literacy in order to achieve better
results. Should we continue to borrow the formal learning methods of school? If .
we were to focus on informal learning methods, surely we would then need to
alter our use of curricula and text book and also the way of formative and/ or
summative assessment of literacy programs. For making a shift from formal
learning methods to informal learning methods, or combining the formal and
informal methods, we need to examine our assumptions about how one knows.
Secondly, we would need to consider the cognitive consequences of learning
literacy and talk about cognitive approaches to literacy.
As has been pointed out by Street (2005) both meaning of literacy and its mode
of operation for research and action are highly contested issues. In order to run
an adult literacy programme for attaining long-term success, we need to probe
into these contested domains. Adult educators need to seek and become aware of
alternative approaches to literacy work. It is only then it would become possible
for them to tell their adult learners to acquire literacy for becoming aware, more
critical and in control of their own development. We may also consider what
Levi-Strauss (1961: 291-292) argued about literacy that it is not the royal route
to liberation and it is many times a means of enslavement.This may be a polemical
view but coming from a great thinker of our times it needs to be seriously
considered by adult educators of the twenty-first century.
Thirdly, you tried to work out the importance of llteracy in various ways by
looking at the global, regional and national scenario on literacy and thereby you
were able to derive lessons for applying better literacy practices in your region.
3.7 REFERENCES
Barton, D. and M. Hamilton 1998. Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in
One Community. London: Routledge.
MHRD. 2003. Education for All: National Plan o f Action INDIA 2003. New
Delhi.
Olson, D. R. 1977. From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and
writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47 (3), 257-28 1.
Rogers, Allen 2003. What is the Difference? A New Critique ofAdult Learning
and Teaching. Leicester: NIACE. .
Rogers, Allen 2006. "Lifelong Learning and the Absence of Gender", in N. Rao
and A. Robinson Pant (Eds.) Special Issue of International Journal of
Educ~atioizalDevelopment on Gender and Adult Education, 26: 189-208.
UNESCO. 2004. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2004: The Quality imperative.
Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. 2005. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005: Literacy for Life. Paris:
UNESCO.
UNICEF. 1990. Meeting Basic Learning Needs: A Vision far the 1990s. The
Background Dacunzent of'Janztien. New York: UNICEF.
United Nations. 2002. United Nations Literacy Decade: Educution ,for All:
Internationul PILZII
of Action- Inzplenzentution of General Assenzbly Resolution
56/115. Report cfthe Secretaq-Getzeml. New York: United Nations.