Notes - CA Inter Strategic Management May 24
Notes - CA Inter Strategic Management May 24
Strategic
Management
Applicable May & Nov 24
Please Note: You may find a slight difference between the notes used in class vs. final notes.
Because Final notes are strictly exam oriented and you will not find anything which is not
relevant for exams.
We already have too much to memorise so please don’t ask for those detailed ones. I hope you
will understand my point here 😊
Please use these notes along with Scanner of past year questions.
Concept of Strategy
‘Strategy’ relates to the ways, the business decides to respond to dynamic and often hostile
external forces while pursuing their vision, mission and ultimate objectives.
Strategy is the game plan that the management of a business uses to take market position,
conduct its operations, attract and satisfy customers, compete successfully, and achieve
organizational objectives.
Strategy is associated with unified design and action for achieving major goals, gaining
command over the situation with a long-range perspective and securing a critically
advantageous position, its implications for corporate functioning are obvious.
Strategy is consciously considered and flexibly designed scheme of corporate intent and
action to mobilise resources, to direct human effort and behaviour, to handle events and
problems, to perceive and utilise opportunities, and to meet challenges and threats for
corporate survival and success.
Important to note that strategy is no substitute for sound, alert and responsible
management. It must be recognised that strategy can never be perfect, flawless and optimal.
It is in the very nature of strategy that it is flexible and pragmatic to take care of sudden
emergencies, pressures, and avoid failures and frustrations. In a sound strategy, allowances
are made for possible miscalculations and unanticipated events.
Understanding 1. The term ‘Strategy’ relates to the ways, the business decides to respond to
Strategy dynamic and often hostile external forces while pursuing their vision,
mission and ultimate objectives.
2. Strategies are essential to navigate complexity and reduce uncertainty
arising from environmental changes.
3. Market Positioning: Strategy acts as a game plan for businesses, guiding
market positioning, operational conduct, customer attraction, and
satisfaction.
4. Unified Design: Strategy unifies (bring together) organizational activities,
defining the essential nature of the business and its future plans.
5. Long-Range Perspective: It offers a long-term perspective, ensuring a
critically advantageous position in the market.
6. Comprehensive Planning: Strategies are comprehensive and integrated plans
ensuring the achievement of basic enterprise objectives (fundamental
business goals).
7. In a sound strategy, allowances are made for possible miscalculations and
unanticipated events.
Formulation of In large organisations, strategies are formulated at:
Strategy
⧫ Corporate,
⧫ Divisional, and
⧫ Functional levels
• Proactive actions on the part of managers to improve the company’s market position
and financial performance.
• Reactions to unanticipated developments and fresh market conditions in the dynamic
business environment.
In other words, a company uses both proactive and reactive strategies to cope up the
uncertain business environment.
Proactive Strategy:
Proactive strategy is planned strategy. While continuing with the previously initiated
business approaches that are working well, the newly launched managerial initiatives aim to
strengthen the company's overall position and performance. These are outcomes of
management's analysis and strategic thinking about the company's situation and its conclusions
about the positioning of the company in the marketplace. If done well, it helps the company to
effectively compete for buyer patronage.
In proactive strategy, organisations will analyse possible environmental scenarios and create
strategic framework after proper planning and set procedures and work on these strategies in
a pre-determined manner. However, in reality no company can forecast both internal and
external environment exactly. Everything cannot be planned in advance. It is not possible to
anticipate moves of rival firms, consumer behaviour, evolving technologies and so on.
Reactive Strategy:
Reactive strategy is triggered by the changes in the environment and provides ways and
means to cope with the negative factors or take advantage of emerging opportunities.
Summary
1. The term ‘Strategy’ relates to the ways, the business decides to respond to dynamic and often
hostile external forces while pursuing their vision, mission and ultimate objectives.
2. Strategies are essential to navigate complexity and reduce uncertainty arising from
environmental changes.
3. Market Positioning: Strategy acts as a game plan for businesses, guiding market positioning,
operational conduct, customer attraction, and satisfaction.
4. Unified Design: Strategy unifies (bring together) organizational activities, defining the essential
nature of the business and its future plans.
5. Long-Range Perspective: It offers a long-term perspective, ensuring a critically advantageous
position in the market.
6. Comprehensive Planning: Strategies are comprehensive and integrated plans ensuring the
achievement of basic enterprise objectives (fundamental business goals).
7. In a sound strategy, allowances are made for possible miscalculations and unanticipated events.
11. Example: Unified Payments Interface (UPI): UPI, a digital payment system in India, exemplifies
well-planned strategy and execution. It solved existing problems, demonstrating the impact of
strategic identification and execution.
• To guide the company successfully through all changes in the environment. That
is to react in the right manner.
Each organization has to build its competitive advantage over the competitors in the
business warfare in order to win. This can be done only by following the process of
strategic management - strategic analysis, formulation and implementation, evaluation
and control of strategies.
• Strategic management helps to enhance the longevity of the business. With the
state of competition and dynamic environment it may be challenging for
organisations to survive in the long run. It helps the organization to take a clear
stand in the related industry and makes sure that it is not just surviving on luck.
Actions over expectations is what strategic management ensures.
• Strategic management helps the organisation to develop certain core
competencies and competitive advantages that would facilitate assist in its fight
for survival and growth.
Direction and 1. Strategic management provides direction to the company, defining goals and
Goal Setting missions.
Importance of 1. Direction and Mission: Strategic management defines company goals and
Management mission, guiding realistic objectives aligned with the vision.
governments and other external factors. Thus, relying on a business strategy blindly
could go absolutely wrong if the environment is turbulent.
Strategic Intent
• Strategic intent can be understood as the philosophical base of strategic
management.
• It is a statement that provides a perspective of the means, which will lead the
organisation, reach its vision in the long run.
• Strategic intent gives an idea of what the organisation desires to attain in future.
• It indicates the long-term market position, which the organisation desires to create
or occupy and the opportunity for exploring new possibilities.
• Strategic intent is generally stated in broad terms but when stated in precise terms
it is an expression of aims to be achieved operationally, i.e., goals and objectives.
Significance of 1. Strategic intent refers to the purpose of what the organization strives for.
Strategic Intent:
2. Senior managers must define "what they want to do" and "why they want to do.
3. “Why they want to do” represents strategic intent of the firm.
Strategic Intent 1. Strategic intent serves as the philosophical base of strategic management.
2. Clarity in strategic intent is vital for future success and growth
3. It is essential for organizations of any nature and size.
4. It implies the purposes an organization endeavours (efforts or attempts made
to achieve a specific goal to achieve)
5. It provides a perspective on the means that will lead to long-term vision.
6. Strategic intent outlines what the organization desires to attain in the future.
7. Strategic intent answers the question of what the organization strives or
stands for.
8. It indicates the long-term market position the organization aims to create or
occupy
9. It provides the framework for the organization to adopt a predetermined
direction.
Forms of 1. At the corporate level, it could be in the form of vision and mission
Strategic Intent statements.
2. At the business level, it could be expressed through the business
definition and business model.
Precision in 1. While generally stated broadly, strategic intent can be expressed precisely.
Expression
2. In precise terms, it becomes an expression of operational aims, including
specific goals and objectives.
Vision
Vision implies the blueprint of the company’s future position. It describes where the
organisation wants to land. It depicts the organisation’s aspirations and provides a glimpse of
what the organisation would like to become in future. Every sub system of the organisation is
required to follow its vision.
Mission
Mission delineates the firm’s business, its goals and ways to reach the goals. It explains the
reason for the existence of the firm in the society. It is designed to help potential
shareholders and investors understand the purpose of the firm. A mission statement helps to
identify, ‘what business the firm undertakes.’ It defines the present capabilities, activities,
customer focus and role in society.
Following points are useful while writing a mission of a company (Essentials of a Good
Mission Statement):
1. One of the roles of a mission statement is to give the organisation its own special
identity, business emphasis and path for development – one that typically sets it apart
from other similarly positioned companies.
2. A company’s business is defined by what needs it is trying to satisfy, which customer
groups it is targeting and the technologies and competencies it uses and the activities
it performs.
3. Good mission statements are – unique to the organisation for which they are developed.
Examples of 1. HDCF Bank has two-fold mission: first, to be the preferred provider of
Mission banking services for target retail and wholesale customer segments. The
Statements second is to achieve healthy growth in profitability, consistent with the
bank’s risk appetite.
2. LIC Ltd.’s Mission is - Ensure and enhance the quality of life of people
through financial security by providing products and services of aspired
attributes with competitive returns, and by rendering resources for
economic development.
Role of Mission 1. The mission is the firm's future visualized, depicting what the company
in Corporate wants to become.
Planning 2. It justifies the firm's presence and existence, legitimizing its operations and
ambitions.
3. Mission serves as a grand design of the firm’s future, amplifying the
reasons for the firm’s existence and its purpose.
The vision describes a future identity while the Mission serves as an on-going and time-
independent guide.
The vision statement can galvanize the people to achieve defined objectives, even if they are
stretch objectives, provided the vision is specific, measurable, achievable, and relevant and
time bound. A mission statement provides a path to realize the vision in line with its values.
These statements have a direct bearing on the bottom line and success of the organization.
A mission statement defines the purpose or broader goal for being in existence or in the
business and can remain the same for decades if crafted well while a vision statement is more
specific in terms of both the future state and the time frame. Vision describes what will be
achieved if the organization is successful.
Goals are open-ended attributes that denote the future states or outcomes. Objectives are
close-ended attributes which are precise and expressed in specific terms. Thus, the
Objectives are more specific and translate the goals to both long term and short-term
perspective.
Objectives, to be meaningful to serve the intended role, must possess the following
characteristics:
Long-term objectives:
• Profitability
• Productivity
• Competitive Position
• Employee Development
• Employee Relations
• Technological Leadership
• Public Responsibility
Long-term objectives represent the results expected from pursuing certain strategies.
Strategies represent the actions to be taken to accomplish long-term objectives. The time
frame for objectives and strategies should be consistent, usually from two to five years.
Short-range objectives then serve as steps toward achieving long term objective.
Values
• A company’s value sets the tone for how the people of think and behave, especially in
situations of dilemma.
• It creates a sense of shared purpose to build a strong foundation and focus on longevity
of the company’s success.
• Employees prefer to work with employers whose values resonate with them - the ones
they can relate to in their daily work and personal life.
• Interestingly, majority of consumers say that they would prefer to buy products and
services from companies that have a purpose that reflects their own value and belief
system. Hence, values have both internal as well as external implications.
• Corporate level
• Business level
• Functional level
Corporate Level:
The corporate level of management consists of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), other
senior executives, the board of directors, and corporate staff. These individuals participate
in strategic decision making within the organization.
Business Level:
Strategic business unit is a self-contained division (with its own functions - For example,
finance, purchasing, production, and marketing departments) that provides a product or
service for a particular market.
The principal general manager at the business level, or the business-level manager, is the head
of the division.
Role:
The strategic role of these managers is to translate the general statements of direction and
intent that come from the corporate level into concrete strategies for individual businesses.
Thus, whereas corporate-level managers are concerned with strategies that span
individual businesses, business-level managers are concerned with strategies that are
specific to a particular business.
Functional Level:
Functional-level managers are responsible for the specific business functions or operations
(human resources, purchasing, product development, customer service, and so on) that
constitute a company or one of its divisions.
Role:
• Although they are not responsible for the overall performance of the organization,
functional managers nevertheless have a major strategic role: to develop functional
strategies in their area that help fulfill the strategic objectives set by business- and
corporate-level general managers.
• Functional managers provide most of the information that makes it possible for business
and corporate-level general managers to formulate realistic and attainable strategies.
• Indeed, because they are closer to the customer than the typical general manager is,
functional managers themselves may generate important ideas that subsequently may
become major strategies for the company.
• Thus, it is important for general managers to listen closely to the ideas of their
functional managers. An equally great responsibility for managers at the operational level
is strategy implementation: the execution of corporate and business-level plans.
Types of 1. Corporate Level: Involves top executives, board of directors, and corporate
Organizational staff.
Levels 2. Business Level: Focuses on specific product lines or services; involves
strategic business units (SBUs) with their own functions.
3. Functional Level: Deals with specific business functions (e.g., HR, purchasing,
product development) within a company or division.
Corporate Level Role: Overseeing the development of strategies for the entire organization.
Management Responsibilities:
1. Defining the mission and goals.
2. Deciding which businesses to be in.
3. Allocating resources among different businesses.
4. Formulating strategies that span individual businesses.
Strategy Responsibilities:
Implementation 1. Executing corporate and business-level plans.
2. Ensuring that strategies are put into action effectively.
3. Adapting strategies based on functional feedback and market responses.
4. Ensuring alignment of day-to-day operations with strategic objectives.
Functions maybe like Finance, Human Resources, Marketing, etc. while Divisions may depend on
the products like for a toys manufacturer - kids toys, teenager toys, etc. could be divisions.
Horizontal Relationship:
• All positions, from top management to staff-level employees, are in the same hierarchical
position.
• It is a flat structure where everyone is considered at same level. This leads to openness
and transparency in work culture and focused more on idea sharing and innovation.
• This type of relationship between levels is more suitable for startups where the need to
share ideas with speed is more desirable.
Matrix Relationship:
• This relationship helps manage huge conglomerates with ease where it is nearly impossible
to track and manage every single team independently.
• In Matrix relationship - there are more than one business level managers for each
functional level teams. It is complex for smaller organisations, but extremely useful for
large organisations.
Corporate, 1. Corporate Level: Sets organizational goals and aspirations.
Business, and
2. Business Level: Plans and executes strategies to achieve corporate goals.
Functional
Levels 3. Functional Level: Executes plans at the operational level to achieve results.
Interlinked 1. Functional and Divisional Relationship: Functions and divisions operate
Relationships independently, headed by managers reporting to business heads.
Example: Divisions like kids' toys and teenager toys in a toy manufacturing
company.
2. Horizontal Relationship: All positions, including top management and staff, are
considered at the same level. Promotes openness, transparency, idea sharing,
and innovation. Suitable for startups and fosters rapid idea sharing.
Example: In a startup environment, the CEO, managers, and employees work
Benefits of 1. Functional and Divisional: Allows for independent operation and specialization
Each within functions or divisions.
Relationship
2. Horizontal: Fosters a culture of openness, encourages idea sharing, and
promotes innovation.
3. Matrix: Facilitates efficient management of large-scale projects and diverse
teams within a conglomerate.
• Flexibility in Matrix Relationships
• Matrix structures provide flexibility for managing complex projects and
multiple teams.
• Complex for smaller organizations but highly effective for large and
diverse enterprises.
Strategic Analysis
There are two major limitations of strategic analysis that we need to be aware of.
1. First, it gives a lot of innovative options but doesn't tell which one to pick. The
options can be overlapping, confusing or difficult to implement.
2. Second, it can be time consuming at times, hurting overall organisational
functioning and also strain other efficient innovations such as developing a new
product or a service.
3. Managing Risks:
(a) Importance of maintaining balance in strategic analysis.
(b) Complexity in the environment complicates strategic balance.
(c) Factors like competitive markets, globalization, technological
advancements pose varying degrees of risk.
⧫ Micro environment
⧫ Macro environment
Elements of Micro-environment
Demographic
Definition and 1. Demographics refer to population characteristics classified by criteria
Components of like age, gender, and income.
Demographics 2. Demographic analysis includes factors such as race, age, income,
education, assets, house ownership, job position, region, etc.
Importance of 1. Business and Economic Significance: Data on demographic qualities are
Demographics crucial for businesses and economists.
2. Marketing and Social Sciences: Marketers and social scientists use
demographic data to understand and segment populations.
Socio-Cultural Environment
Definition of 1. Socio-cultural environment influences enterprises universally,
Socio-Cultural encompassing social traditions, values, beliefs, literacy standards, ethics,
Environment social stratification, and societal cohesion.
2. Differs from demographics as it focuses on the behaviour and belief
system of the population, not just their characteristics.
Components of 1. Human Relationships: Relates to how people interact within society.
Socio-Cultural 2. Social Attitudes and Cultural Values: Impact organizational operations.
Environment 3. Beliefs, Values, and Norms: Determine interrelationships between
individuals and organizations
Relevance for 1. Persistent Core Beliefs: Core beliefs in society remain stable and are hard
Businesses to change.
2. Adaptation to Social Norms: Businesses must adjust their operations to
align with societal norms and beliefs for successful operation.
3. Impact on Strategic Management: Affects mission and objective setting,
as well as decisions related to products and markets within organizations.
Political-Legal Environment
Components of 1. Economic environment directly impacts business strategies.
Political-Legal 2. Encompasses regional, national, and global economic conditions affecting
Environment resources, costs, quality, and availability
Influence on 1. Government Policies: Business operations are significantly influenced and
Business controlled by government policies.
2. Regulatory Changes: Businesses need to adapt to changes in the regulatory
framework, including taxes and duties, impacting their operations.
3. Understanding Laws: Businesses must be aware of major laws protecting
consumers, competition, and organizations.
4. Relevant Laws: Knowledge of laws related to companies, competition,
intellectual property, foreign exchange, and labour is essential for
businesses operating in any country.
Technological Environment
Political Factors:
Economic Factors:
3. Money Supply, Inflation, and Income: Impact business decisions, credit flow,
and per capita income, influencing business strategies.
Social Factors:
1. Demand and Business Operations: Social factors influence product demand and
affect how a company operates.
Technological Factors:
Legal Factors:
1. Operational Impact: Affect how a company operates, its costs, and product
demand.
2. Ease of Business: Legal factors influence the ease of conducting business
operations.
Environmental Factors:
Internationalization of Business
Internationalization has emerged as the dominant commercial trend over the last
couple of decades. It enables a business to enter new markets in search of greater
earnings and less expensive resources. Additionally, expanding internationally enable a
business to achieve greater economies of scale and extend the lifespan of its
products.
Developing internationally:
⧫ Evaluate global opportunities and threats and rate them with the internal
capabilities.
⧫ Describe the scope of the firm's global commercial operations.
⧫ Create the firm's global business objectives.
⧫ Develop distinct corporate strategies for the global business and whole
organisation.
International Environment
Assessments of the international environment can be done at three levels:
1. Multinational
2. Regional
3. Country
Types of Products:
Product Lifecycle:
1. The first stage of PLC is the Introduction stage with slow sales growth, in
which competition is almost negligible, prices are relatively high, and markets
are limited. The growth in sales is at a lower rate because of lack of awareness
on the part of customers.
2. The second phase of PLC is Growth stage with rapid market acceptance. In
the growth stage, the demand expands rapidly, prices fall, competition
increases, and market expands. The customer has knowledge about the product
and shows interest in purchasing it.
3. The third phase of PLC is Maturity stage where there is slowdown in growth
rate. In this stage, the competition gets tough, and market gets stabilised.
Profit comes down because of stiff competition. At this stage, organisations
have to work for maintaining stability.
4. In the fourth stage of PLC is Declines with sharp downward drift in sales. The
sales and profits fall down sharply due to some new product replaces the
existing product. So, a combination of strategies can be implemented to stay in
the market either by diversification or retrenchment.
The primary activities of the organization are grouped into five main areas:
1. Inbound logistics are the activities concerned with receiving, storing and
distributing the inputs to the product/service. This includes materials handling,
stock control, transport etc. Like, transportation and warehousing.
2. Operations transform these inputs into the final product or service: machining,
packaging, assembly, testing, etc. convert raw materials in finished goods.
3. Outbound logistics collect, store and distribute the product to customers. For
tangible products this would be warehousing, materials handling, transport, etc.
In the case of services, it may be more concerned with arrangements for
bringing customers to the service, if it is a fixed location (e.g., sports events).
4. Marketing and sales provide the means whereby consumers/users are made
aware of the product/service and are able to purchase it. This would include
sales administration, advertising, selling and so on. In public services,
communication networks which help users’ access a particular service are often
important.
5. Services are all those activities, which enhance or maintain the value of a
product/service, such as installation, repair, training and spares.
Each of these groups of primary activities are linked to support activities. These
can be divided into four areas:
Procurement:
Technology Development:
Infrastructure:
1. Competitive pressures associated with Rival sellers compete for buyers' attention
and loyalty.
2. Competitive pressures associated with the threat of new entrants into the
market.
3. Competitive pressures coming from the attempts of companies in other industries
to win buyers over to their own substitute products.
4. Competitive pressures stemming from supplier bargaining power and supplier-
seller collaboration.
5. Competitive pressures stemming from buyer bargaining power and seller-buyer
Collaboration.
Step 1: Identify the specific competitive pressures associated with each of the five
forces.
Step 2: Evaluate how strong the pressures comprising each of the five forces are
(fierce, strong, moderate to normal, or weak).
Step 3: Determine whether the collective strength of the five competitive forces is
conducive to earning attractive profits
New entrants place a limit on prices and affect the profitability of existing players.
The new capacity and product range the new entrants bring increases competitive
pressure. bigger the new entrant, the more severe the competitive effect. New
entrants can limit prices and impact the profitability of existing companies.
To deter new entrants, existing firms can create barriers like high capital
requirements, economies of scale, unique products, brand identity, and access to
distribution channels. These are explained as follows:
5. Brand Identity: Existing companies' strong brand identity is hard for new
entrants to match, requiring substantial time and resources.
The bargaining power of the buyers influences not only the prices that the producer
can charge but also influence costs and investments of the producer. This force will
become heavier depending on the possibilities of the buyers forming groups or
cartels, particularly in case of industrial products.
1. Buyers have full knowledge of the sources of products and their substitutes.
2. They spend a lot of money on the industry’s products i.e. they are big buyers.
3. The industry’s product is not perceived as critical to the buyer’s needs and
buyers are more concentrated than firms supplying the product. They can
easily switch to the substitutes available.
Often suppliers can exercise considerable bargaining power. If the suppliers are also
limited in number they stand a still better chance to exhibit their bargaining power.
The bargaining power of suppliers determines the cost of raw materials and other
inputs of the industry and, therefore, can affect industry attractiveness and
profitability.
1. Their products are crucial to the buyer and substitutes are not available.
2. They can erect high switching costs.
3. They are more concentrated than their buyers.
Rivalry among competitors tends to be cutthroat and industry profitability low under
various conditions explained as follows:
1. Industry Leader: A strong leader can prevent price wars due to financial
strength, making smaller rivals hesitant to start conflicts.
2. Number of Competitors: More competitors make it harder for the leader to
control prices, leading to challenges in communication.
3. Fixed Costs: High fixed costs drive rivals to cut prices to utilize excess capacity,
reducing industry profitability.
4. Exit Barriers: Rivalry decreases if competitors leave the industry, leading to
higher profitability in industries with few exit obstacles.
5. Product Differentiation: Unique products shield companies from price wars,
increasing profitability in differentiated industries.
6. Slow Growth: Industries with slow growth face intense rivalry as competitors
fight for market share, lowering profitability for all.
Threat of Substitute
A final force that can influence industry profitability is the availability of substitutes
for an industry’s product. To predict profit pressure from this source, firms must
search for products that perform the same, or nearly the same, function as their
existing products.
Attractiveness of Industry
The important factors on which the management may base such conclusions include:
4. Competitive Position: Is the company in a strong position, and will it get stronger
or weaker?
5. Exploiting Weaknesses: Can the company benefit from weaker rivals in the
industry?
6. Defending Against Challenges: Can the company handle or counter industry
challenges?
7. Risk and Uncertainty: How risky and uncertain is the industry's future?
8. Industry Problems: How severe are the overall problems faced by the industry?
9. Strategic Importance: Does participating in this industry contribute significantly
to the company’s overall success?
Experience Curve
Experience curve is similar to learning curve which explains the efficiency gained by
workers through repetitive productive work. Experience curve is based on the commonly
observed phenomenon that unit costs decline as a firm accumulates experience in terms
of a cumulative volume of production.
The implication is that larger firms in an industry would tend to have lower unit costs as
compared to those of smaller organizations, thereby gaining a competitive cost
advantage.
Experience curve results from a variety of factors such as learning effects, economies
of scale, product redesign and technological improvements in production
This means bigger companies tend to have lower costs, giving them a competitive edge.
Various factors like learning, economies of scale, product improvements, and technology
contribute to this cost reduction.
Value Creation
Value creation means offering products and services that customers find valuable. It
includes features, quality, durability, and performance that customers are willing to pay
for. Businesses also consider value for stakeholders, expanding the concept beyond just
customers.
Value creation is about a company making products, services, or business processes more
valuable. Businesses aim to create value for customers and stakeholders, enhancing
their investment. This strategy provides a competitive advantage and boosts profits.
The concept of a value chain helps analyse different functions within organizations,
revealing sources of differentiation and cost behaviour. Ultimately, value creation
occurs when consumers value a product more than its cost, leading to increased profits
for businesses.
Customer Behaviour:
Customer behaviour goes beyond knowing who the customers are; it delves into how they
buy products. It looks at how often they shop, what they like, and how they perceive
your marketing and services. This understanding helps businesses talk to customers
effectively. Knowing these behaviours helps create successful marketing campaigns,
offer products that customers want, and keep them coming back for more purchases.
Influence:
Decision Making:
A rational consumer gathers information, considers pros and cons, and then makes a
decision based on their findings and existing knowledge.
Post-decision Processes:
After making a decision and purchasing a product, the final phase in the decision-making
process is evaluating the outcome.
The consumer's reaction may vary depending upon the satisfaction. While a happy
customer may make repeat purchase and recommend to others, customer with
dissonance will neither purchase the product again nor recommend it to others.
Competitive Strategy
The competitive strategy of a firm within a certain business field is analysed using two
criteria:
Competitive Landscape:
Identify the competitor: The first step to understand the competitive landscape is to
identify the competitors in the firm’s industry and have actual data about their
respective market share.
Understand the competitors: Once the competitors have been identified, the
strategist can use market research report, internet, newspapers, social media, industry
reports, and various other sources to understand the products and services offered by
them in different markets.
Determine the strengths of the competitors: What are the strengths of the
competitors? What do they do well? Do they offer great products? Why are consumers
liking their product/service? Do they utilize marketing in a way that comparatively
reaches out to more consumers? Why do customers give them their business?
Determine the weaknesses of the competitors: Identify the areas where the
competitor is lacking or is weak. Weaknesses (and strengths) can be identified by going
through consumer reports and reviews appearing in various media. Financial strength and
weakness can always be learnt from annual reports.
Put all of the information together: At this stage, the strategist should put together
all information about competitors and draw inference about what they are not offering
and what the firm can do to fill in the gaps. The strategist can also know the areas
which need to be strengthen by the firm.
Competitive Strategy
Key Success Factors (KSFs) are those things that most affect industry members’ ability
to prosper in the market place – the particular strategy elements, product attributes,
resources, competencies, competitive capabilities and business outcomes that spell the
difference between profit & loss and ultimately, between competitive success or failure.
Key success factors are the prerequisites for industry success or, to put it another
way, KSFs are the factors that shape whether a company will be financially and
competitively successful.
Identifying industry key success factors (KSFs) is crucial for strategic analysis.
Managers must understand which factors are most important for competitive
success.
Organizations gaining insight into industry KSFs can achieve sustainable
competitive advantage.
Excelling at one or more KSFs offers an opportunity for competitive advantage.
Key success factors differ between industries and can change over time.
The answers to three questions help identify an industry’s key success factors:
Introduction
1. They have the power to influence the organization's strategy and performance.
Mendelow’s Matrix
The Mendelow Stakeholder matrix (also known as the Stakeholder Analysis matrix and
the Power-Interest matrix) is a simple framework to help manage key stakeholders.
Keep Satisfied Stakeholders: High Power, Less Interested People - Organisation should
put in enough work with these people to keep them satisfied with their intended
information on a regular basis. For example, banks, government, customers, etc.
Key Players Stakeholders: High power, highly interested people - Organisation’s aim
should be to fully engage this group of stakeholders, making the greatest efforts to
satisfy them, take their advice, build actions and keep them informed with all information
on a regular basis. For example, Shareholders, CEO, Board of Directors, etc.
Low Priority Stakeholders: Low Power, Less Interested People - Organisation should
only monitor them with no actions to satisfy their expectations. Strategically, minimal
efforts should be spent on this group of stakeholders while keeping an eye to check if
their levels of interest or power change. For example, business magazines, media houses,
etc.
Keep Informed Stakeholders: Low power, highly interested people - Organisation should
adequately inform this group of people and communicate with them to ensure that no
major issues arise. This audiences can also help with real time feedbacks and areas of
improvement for an organisation. For example, employees, vendors, suppliers, legal experts,
etc.
Memory Aid:
Strategic Drivers
Strategic drivers, a crucial aspect of internal analysis, focus on evaluating a business's
current performance by identifying what sets it apart from competitors.
This involves analysing key markets, customers, products/services, channels, and the
organization's competitive advantage. The interconnection between components, such as
markets and products/services, highlights the complexity of this assessment.
A market is defined as the sum total of all the buyers and sellers in the area or region
under consideration. The value, cost and price of items traded are as per forces of supply
and demand in a market.
The market may be a physical entity or may be virtual like e-commerce websites and
applications. It may further be local or global, depending on which all countries the
business sells its products in.
Market refers to all the buyers and sellers of a particular product/service and so it would
be incorrect to say that market is the same for all businesses. Each business has its own
set of customers i.e. market and more so, each product within a business has its own
market.
For example, for a FMCG brand selling Shampoos, Dairy Products, Flours, Washing Powder,
etc. - each product line will have a separate market to cater to and therefore build
strategies specific to the market of concern.
A strategic group consists of those rival firms which have similar competitive approaches
and positions in the market. Companies in the same strategic group can resemble one
another in any of the several ways – have comparable product-line breadth, same
price/quality range, same distribution channels, same product attributes, identical
technological approaches, offer similar services and technical assistance and so on.
The procedure for constructing a strategic group map and deciding which firms belong
in which strategic group is as follows:
Customers
Understanding the different types of customers to whom the organisation’s
products/services are sold or provided, is not only important but also the first step in
deciding the product/service.
Different customers may have different needs and require different sales models or
distribution channels.
• Understanding key customers helps identify areas for improvement and business
focus.
• Understanding customer trends and profitability are crucial for profit generation.
• Data collection allows identification of issues and pursuit of growth in targeted areas.
• Customer buys, consumer uses. Example: Parent as the customer buying stationery,
kids as consumers using it.
• From a pricing perspective - the customer is of more importance and from value
creation and design/usability, consumer needs to be the kept at the center of
decision making.
Customer vs Consumer:
Consumers are the ones who finally use a product/service, while customers are the buyers
of that product. A customer can be a consumer and vice versa. But for strategy teams
especially marketing teams it is important to understand the customer and consumer
separately.
Product/Services
In this component of the strategic drivers’ analysis, business identifies the key products/
services that the organisation offers and how those products/services are performing. It
attempts to answer the general question: What business are we in and what should be done
to win over competition in each product/service we serve.
• Strategies are needed for managing existing product over time, adding new ones and
dropping failed products.
• Strategic decisions must also be made regarding branding, packaging and other
product features such as warranties.
For a new product, pricing strategies for entering a market need to be designed and
for that matter at least three objectives must be kept in mind:
particular person. For example, politicians, sports stars, film stars, etc. i.e., market
themselves to get votes, or to promote their careers.
11. Synchro-marketing: When the demand for a product is irregular due to season, some
parts of the day, or on hour basis, causing idle capacity or overworked capacities,
synchro-marketing can be used to find ways to alter the pattern of demand through
flexible pricing, promotion, and other incentives. For example, products such as movie
tickets can be sold at lower price over weekdays to generate demand.
Memory Aid:
Synchro-marketing: Sell
Place Marketing: Pizza
Direct Marketing: Daily CA Inter with CA Himanshu
Person Marketing: People
Enlightened Marketing: Regularly
Relationship Marketing: Eat
Organization Marketing: Over there
Concentrated Marketing: Once C
Differential Marketing: D
Demarketing: D came
Channels
Channels are the distribution system by which an organisation distributes its product or
provides its service.
To understand the concept of channels let us see some examples of how the following
companies distribute their products and services:
1. Lakme - sells its products via retail stores, intermediary stores (like Nykaa,
2. Westside, Reliance Trends, as well as online mode like amazon, flipkart, nykaa online
and its own website.
3. Boat Headphones - only online via e-commerce platforms like flipkart and amazon
4. Coca Cola - retail shops across the nation, in each district, each town as well as online
mode via dunzo, blinkit, etc.
There are typically three channels that should be considered: sales channel, product
channel and service channel.
1. The sales channel - These are the intermediaries involved in selling the product
through each channel and ultimately to the end user. The key question is: Who
needs to sell to whom for your product to be sold to your end user? For example,
many fashion designers use agencies to sell their products to retail organisations, so
that consumers can access them.
2. The product channel - The product channel focuses on the series of intermediaries
who physically handle the product on its path from its producer to the end user.
This is true of Australia Post, who delivers and distributes many online purchases
between the seller and purchaser when using eBay and other online stores.
3. The service channel - The service channel refers to the entities that provide
necessary services to support the product, as it moves through the sales channel
and after purchase by the end user. The service channel is an important
consideration for products that are complex in terms of installation or customer
assistance. For example, a Bosch dishwasher may be sold in a Bosch showroom, and
then once sold it is installed by a Bosch contracted plumber.
Channel analysis is important when the business strategy is to scale up and expand beyond
the current geographies and markets.
When a business plans to grow to newer markets, they need to develop or leverage existing
channels to get to new customers.
Thus, analysis of channels that suit one’s products and customers is of utmost importance.
C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel introduced the concept of core competency, defined as
collective organizational learning, encompassing diverse production skills and integrating
multiple technologies.
Competency is viewed as a combination of skills and techniques rather than individual skill
or separate technique. In core competencies, organizations typically combine various skills
and techniques, allowing the entire organization to benefit from these diverse individual
capabilities. Therefore, core competencies cannot be built on one capability or single
technological know-how, instead, it has to be the integration of many resources.
They represent distinctive skills as well as intangible, invisible, intellectual assets and
cultural capabilities. Cultural capabilities refer to the ability to manage change, the ability
to learn and team working. Core Competence-based diversification reduces risk and
investment and increases the opportunities for transferring learning and best practice
across business units.
The human resource manager has a significant role to play in developing core competency
of the firm. Core-competencies can be generated and maintained only through the
effective management of human resources and their skills.
Core technological competencies are also corporate assets; and as assets, they facilitate
corporate access to a variety of markets and businesses
According to C.K. Prahalad and Gary Hamel, major core competencies are identified
in three areas:
• Competitor differentiation,
• Customer value, and
• Application to other markets
1. Competitor Differentiation:
Competitor differentiation is a key condition for core competence. To qualify, a
competence must be unique and challenging for competitors to imitate. This uniqueness
provides a competitive edge, allowing the company to offer distinct products or services
that competitors cannot easily replicate.
2. Customer Value:
The last condition for core competence involves applying competencies to other
markets.
• Core competence must be applicable across the entire organization, not limited to a
specific skill or expertise.
• Even if a particular capability is crucial for business success, it won't be
considered a core competence if it's not fundamental from the organization's
overall perspective.
• Core competence is a unique set of skills and expertise used throughout the
organization to explore and exploit potential markets.
If the three above-mentioned conditions are met, then the company can regard it
competence as core competency.
For example:
Marketing and Sales is a core competence of Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) This means that
HUL has used its resources to form marketing related capabilities that in turn allow it to market
its products in ways that are superior those of competitors. Because of this core competence, HUL
is capable of launching new brands in the market successfully.
Wal-Mart focuses on lowering its operating costs. The cost advantage that Wal-Mart has created
for itself has allowed the retailer to price goods lower than most competitors. The core
competency in this case is derived from the company’s ability to generate large sales volume,
allowing the company to remain profitable with low profit margin.
Valuable:
Capabilities become valuable when a firm can leverage them to seize opportunities or
mitigate threats in its external environment. The firm generates value for customers by
efficiently utilizing these capabilities to capitalize on opportunities.
Rare:
Core competencies are very rare capabilities and very few of the competitors possess this.
Capabilities that are widespread among many rivals are unlikely to confer a competitive
advantage to any single entity. Competitive advantage results only when firms develop and
exploit valuable capabilities that differ from those shared with competitors.
Costly to imitate:
Costly to imitate means such capabilities that competing firms are unable to develop easily.
For example, Intel has enjoyed a first-mover advantage more than once because of its
rare fast R&D cycle time capability that brought SRAM and DRAM integrated circuit
technology and brought microprocessors to market well ahead of the competitor. The
product could be imitated in due course of time, but it was much more difficult to imitate
the R&D cycle time capability.
The strategic value of capabilities increases as they become more difficult to substitute.
For example, Competitors are deeply aware about Apple’s operating system’s (iOS)
successful model. However, to date, no competitor has been able to imitate Apple’s
capabilities. These are also protected through copyrights.
The benefit of this analysis is that it identifies the complex issues for an organisation and
puts them into a simple framework. While on the other hand, one of the major criticisms
of this tool is that it does not generally provide for evaluation of strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats in the competitive context.
SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats. Internal analysis is
more focused on understanding the existing structure and competencies of the business,
thus highlighting the Strengths and Weaknesses, while External Analysis is about
identifying and preparing for uncontrollable which can either be Opportunities or threats.
Therefore, SWOT Analysis is a tool which is used for both Internal and External Analysis.
It is achieved advantage over rivals when a company’s profitability is greater than average
profitability of firms in its industry. It is the result of a successful strategy. This position
gets translated into higher market share, higher profits when compared to those that are
obtained by competitors operating in the same industry.
Competitive advantage may also be in the form of low cost relationship in the industry or
being unique in the industry along dimensions that are widely valued by the customers in
particular and the society at large.
It is achieved when the firm successfully formulates and implements the value creation
strategy and other firms are unable to duplicate it or find it too costly to imitate.
Further, it can be said that a firm is successful in achieving competitive advantage only
after other firm’s efforts to duplicate or imitate it fails.
• Cost leadership,
• Differentiation, and
• Focus.
Porter called these base generic strategies. These strategies have been termed generic,
because they can be pursued by any type or size of business firm and even by not-for-
profit organisations.
Larger firms with greater access to resources typically compete on a cost leadership
and/or differentiation basis, whereas smaller firms often compete on a focus basis.
• that competitors may imitate the strategy, therefore driving overall industry
profits down;
• that technological breakthroughs in the industry may make the strategy ineffective;
or that buyer interests may swing to other differentiating features besides price.
A cost leadership strategy may help to remain profitable even with rivalry, new entrants,
supplier’s power, substitute products, and buyers’ power.
1. Rivalry – Competitors are likely to avoid a price war, since the low-cost firm will
continue to earn profits even after competitors compete away their profits.
2. Buyers – Powerful buyers/customers would not be able to exploit the cost leader firm
and will continue to buy its product.
3. Suppliers – Cost leaders are able to absorb greater price increases from suppliers
before they need to raise prices for customers.
4. Entrants – Low-cost leaders CAcreate barriers to market entry through their
Inter with CA Himanshu
1. Cost advantage may not last long as competitors may imitate cost reduction
techniques.
2. Cost leadership can succeed only if the firm can achieve higher sales volume.
3. Cost leaders tend to keep their costs low by minimizing cost of advertising, market
research, and research and development, but this approach can prove to be expensive
in the long run.
4. Technological advancement areas a great threat to cost leaders.
Differentiation Strategy
Differentiation strategy is aimed at broad mass market and involves the creation of a
product or service that is perceived by the customers as unique. The uniqueness can be
associated with product design, brand image, features, technology, dealer network or
customer service. Because of differentiation, the business can charge a premium for its
product.
Differentiation strategy should be pursued only after a careful study of buyers’ needs and
preferences to determine the feasibility of incorporating one or more differentiating
features into a unique product that features the desired attributes.
• The unique product may not be valued high enough by customers to justify the
higher price. When this happens, a cost leadership strategy will easily defeat a
differentiation strategy.
• Competitors may develop ways to copy the differentiating features quickly.
Basis of Differentiation:
There are several bases of differentiation, major being: Product, Pricing and Organization.
Product: Innovative products that meet customer needs can be an area where a company
has an advantage over competitors. However, the pursuit of a new product offering can be
costly – research and development, as well as production and marketing costs can all add to
the cost of production and distribution. The payoff, however, can be great as customer’s
flock to be among the first to have the new product. For example, Apple iPhone, has
invested huge amounts of money in R&D, and the customers’ value that. They want to be
among the first ones to try the new offerings from the company.
Pricing: It fluctuates based on its supply and demand and may also be influenced by the
customer’s ideal value for a product. Companies that differentiate based on product price
can either determine to offer the lowest price or can attempt to establish superiority
through higher prices. For example, Apple iPhone dominates the smart phone segment by
charging higher prices for its products.
1. Offer utility to the customers and match products with their tastes and
preferences.
2. Elevate/Improve performance of the product.
3. Offer the high-quality product/service for buyer satisfaction.
4. Rapid product innovation to keep up with dynamic environment.
5. Taking steps for enhancing brand image and brand value.
6. Fixing product prices based on the unique features of product and buying capacity of
the customer.
A differentiation strategy may help an organisation to remain profitable even with rivalry,
new entrants, suppliers’ power, substitute products, and buyers’ power.
Focus Strategies
Focus strategies are most effective when consumers have distinctive preferences or
requirements, and when the rival firms are not attempting to specialize in the same target
segment.
Focused cost leadership: A focused cost leadership strategy requires competing based on
price to target a narrow market. A firm that follows this strategy does not necessarily
charge the lowest prices in the industry. Instead, it charges low prices relative to other
firms that compete within the target market. Firms that compete based on price and
target a narrow market follow a focused cost leadership strategy.
1. Selecting specific niches which are not covered by cost leaders and differentiators.
2. Creating superior skills for catering such niche markets.
3. Generating high efficiencies for serving such niche markets.
4. Developing innovative ways in managing the value chain.
1. The firms lacking in distinctive competencies may not be able to pursue focus
strategy.
2. Due to the limited demand of product/services, costs are high, which can cause
problems.
3. In the long run, the niche could disappear or be taken over by larger competitors by
acquiring the same distinctive competencies.
The objective is to keep costs and prices lower than those of other sellers of “comparable
products".
Best-cost provider strategy involves providing customers more value for the money by
emphasizing on lower cost and better-quality differences. It can be done through:
a. Offering products at lower price than what is being offered by rivals for products
with comparable quality and features Or
b. Charging similar price as by the rivals for products with much higher quality and
better features.
Introduction
Strategic Choices
The corporate strategies a firm can adopt may be classified into four broad categories:
1. Stability strategy
2. Expansion strategy
3. Retrenchment strategy
4. Combination strategy
Stability Strategy
Stability strategies are intended to safeguard the existing interests and strengths of business. It
involves organisations to pursue established and tested objectives, continue on the chosen path,
maintain operational efficiency and so on.
A stability strategy is pursued when a firm continues to serve in the same or similar markets and
deals in same products and services. In stability strategy, few functional changes are made in the
products or markets, however, it is not a ‘do nothing’ strategy. This strategy is typical for mature
business organizations. Some small organizations also frequently use stability as a strategic focus
to maintain comfortable market or profit position.
1. A product has reached the maturity stage of the product life cycle.
2. The staff feels comfortable with the status quo as it involves less changes and less risks.
3. It is opted when the environment in which an organisation is operating is relatively stable.
4. Where it is not advisable to expand as it may be perceived as threatening.
5. After rapid expansion, a firm might want to stabilize and consolidate itself.
1. A firm opting for stability strategy stays with the same business, same product-market
posture and functions, maintaining same level of effort as at present.
2. The endeavour is to enhance functional efficiencies in an incremental way, through better
deployment and utilization of resources. The assessment of the firm is that the desired
income and profits would be forthcoming through such incremental improvements in
functional efficiencies.
3. Stability strategy does not involve a redefinition of the business.
4. It is a safe strategy that maintains status quo.
5. It does not warrant much of fresh investments.
6. The risk involved in this strategy is less.
7. While opting for this strategy, the organization can concentrate on its resources and existing
businesses/products and markets, thus leading to building of core competencies.
8. The firms with modest growth objective choose this strategy.
A startup is an entrepreneurial venture in the early stages of ideation and development, generally
created for solving real-life problems through technology. For it, the most important factors are
speed and agility, because of it being in a nascent stage of operations. Stability on the other hand
is more meaningful strategy when the size of operations is expanded to full capacity and business
is at a mature stage. Thereby, we rarely see startups aiming for stability.
Growth/Expansion Strategy
The Growth/Expansion strategy involves redefining the business through the expansion of its
scope and a substantial increase in business investments. This strategy is synonymous with
dynamism, energy, promise, and success. It is typically marked by a significant re-evaluation of
goals and directions, as well as major initiatives involving substantial investments, exploration into
new products, adoption of new technology, entry into new markets, innovative decision-making, and
action programs, among other aspects.
iii. Innovation
(B) External growth strategies
a. Expansion through Mergers and Acquisitions
i. Horizontal Merger
ii. Vertical Merger
iii. Co-generic Merger
iv. Conglomerate Merger
b. Expansion through Strategic Alliance
Expansion or growth through intensification means that the organisation tries to grow internally by
intensifying its operations either by market penetration or market development or by product
development. It tries to cash on its internal capabilities and internal resources.
Igor. H. Ansoff gave a framework as shown in figure below which describes the intensification
options available to a firm:
Diversification is defined as entry into new products or product lines, new services or new
markets, involving substantially different skills, technology and knowledge. Diversification
endeavours can be related or unrelated to existing businesses of the firm.
Based on the nature and extent of their relationship to existing businesses, diversification can be
classified into two broad categories:
Concentric Diversification
Concentric diversification takes place when the products are related. In this diversification, the
new business that is it diversifies into is linked to the existing businesses through process,
technology or marketing.
The new product is a spin-off from the existing facilities and products/processes. This means that
in concentric diversification too, there are benefits of synergy with the current operations.
For example: A company producing clothes ventures into the manufacturing of shoes.
Reasons for pursuing: The most common reason for pursuing a concentric diversification is that
opportunities in a firm’s existing line of business are available.
1. Vertical integration
2. Horizontal integration
In vertically integrated diversification, firms opt to engage in businesses that are related to the
existing business of the firm. The firm remains vertically within the same process sequence moves
forward or backward in the chain and enters specific product/process steps with the intention of
making them into new businesses for the firm.
Forward integration is moving forward in the value chain and entering business lines that use
existing products. Forward integration will also take place where organizations enter into
businesses of distribution channels. For example, A coffee bean manufacture may choose to merge
with a coffee cafe.
Backward integration is concerned with creation of effective supply by entering business of input
providers. Strategy employed to expand profits and gain greater control over production/supply of
a product whereby a company will purchase or build a business that will increase its own supply
capability or lessen its cost of production. For example, A large supermarket chain considers to
purchase a number of farms that would provide it a significant amount of fresh produce.
A firm gets horizontally diversified by integrating through acquisition of one or more similar
CA Inter with CA Himanshu
businesses operating at the same stage of the production-marketing chain. They can also integrate
with the firms producing complementary products or by-products or by taking over competitors’
products.
Conglomerate Diversification
Innovation drives upgradation of existing product lines or processes, leading to increased market
share, revenues, profitability and most important, customer satisfaction.
1. Helps to solve complex problems: A business looks for chances to solve societal issues
through planned innovation in its areas of expertise. This guided innovation aims to address
complex problems by creating sustainable solutions that focus on customer needs. For
instance, the environmental issue is being addressed by transitioning to renewable energy
sources such as solar, wind, and sea waves.
3. Gives Competitive Advantage: Innovation is crucial for staying ahead of competitors, and
businesses dedicate strategic efforts to achieve this advantage. The faster a business
innovates, the more it distances itself from competitors. Innovative products, focused on
providing added satisfaction, create a competitive advantage by both retaining existing
customers and attracting new ones.
When the organization instead of growing internally thinks of diversifying by making alliances with
external organisations, it is called external growth diversification. It can be classified in two ways:
Mergers and acquisitions offer swift expansion, avoiding the complexities of internal growth.
Organizations assess these opportunities for mutual benefit, seeking positive synergies in areas
like facilities and skills. Mergers involve friendly collaboration, while acquisitions, often during
economic downturns, result in a stronger entity taking control of a weaker one for combined
operations.
The following are the types of mergers and are quite similar to the types of diversification:
Horizontal Merger
Horizontal merger is a combination of firms engaged in the same industry. It is a merger with a
direct competitor. The principal objective behind this type of merger is to achieve economies of
scale in the production process by shedding duplication of installations and functions, widening the
line of products, decrease in working capital and fixed assets investment, getting rid of
competition and so on.
For example, formation of Brook Bond Lipton India Ltd. through the merger of Lipton India and
Brook Bond.
Vertical Merger
It is a merger of two organizations that are operating in the same industry but at different stages
of production or distribution system. This often leads to increased synergies with the merging
firms. If an organization takes over its supplier/producers of raw material, then it leads to
backward integration. On the other hand, forward integration happens when an organization
decides to take over its buyer organizations or distribution channels. Vertical merger results in
many operating and financial economies. Vertical mergers help to create an advantageous position
by restricting the supply of inputs to other players, or by providing the inputs at a higher cost.
Co-generic Merger
In Co-generic merger two or more merging organizations are associated in some way or the other
related to the production processes, business markets, or basic required technologies. Such
merger includes the extension of the product line or acquiring components that are required in the
daily operations. It offers great opportunities to businesses to diversify around a common set of
resources and strategic requirements.
For example: an organization in the white goods category such as refrigerators can diversify by
merging with another organization having business in kitchen appliances
Conglomerate Merger
Conglomerate mergers are the combination of organizations that are unrelated to each other.
There are no linkages with respect to customer groups, customer functions and technologies being
used. There are no important common factors between the organizations in production, marketing,
research and development and technology. In practice, however, there is some degree of overlap in
one or more of these factors.
A strategic alliance is a relationship between two or more businesses that enables each to achieve
certain strategic objectives which neither would be able to achieve on its own. Strategic alliances
are often formed in the global marketplace between businesses that are based in different regions
of the world.
Strategic alliance usually is only formed if they provide an advantage to all the parties in the
alliance. These advantages can be broadly categorised as follows:
1. Organizational: Strategic alliance helps to learn necessary skills and obtain certain
capabilities from strategic partners. Strategic partners may also help to enhance productive
capacity, provide a distribution system, or extend supply chain. Having a strategic partner
who is well-known and respected also helps add legitimacy and creditability to a new venture.
2. Economic: There can be reduction in costs and risks by distributing them across the
members of the alliance. Greater economies of scale can be obtained in an alliance, as
production volume can increase, causing the cost per unit to decline. Finally, partners can take
advantage of co-specialization, creating additional value, such as when a leading computer
manufacturer bundles its desktop with a leading monitor manufacturer’s monitor.
3. Strategic: Rivals can join together to cooperate instead of competing with each other.
Vertical integration can be created where partners are part of supply chain. Strategic
alliances may also be useful to create a competitive advantage by the pooling of resources
and skills. This may also help with future business opportunities and the development of new
products and technologies. Strategic alliances may also be used to get access to new
technologies or to pursue joint research and development.
4. Political: Sometimes strategic alliances are formed with a local foreign business to gain entry
into a foreign market either because of local prejudices or legal barriers to entry. Forming
strategic alliances with politically influential partners may also help improve your own
influence and position.
The major disadvantage is sharing. Strategic alliances require sharing of resources and profits, and
also sharing knowledge and skills that otherwise organisations may not like to share. Sharing
knowledge and skills can be problematic if they involve trade secrets.
Strategic Exits
Strategic Exits are followed when an organization substantially reduces the scope of its activity.
This is done through an attempt to find out the problem areas and diagnose the causes of the
problems. Next, steps are taken to solve the problems.
Turnaround Strategy
Retrenchment may be done either internally or externally. For internal retrenchment to take place,
emphasis is laid on improving internal efficiency, known as turnaround strategy.
There are certain conditions or indicators which point out that a turnaround is needed if the
company has to survive. These danger signals are:
1. Stage One – Assessment of current problems: In the first step, assess the current
problems and get to the root causes and the extent of damage.
2. Stage Two – Analyse the situation and develop a strategic plan: Identify major problems
and opportunities, develop a strategic plan with specific goals and detailed functional
actions after analysing strengths and weaknesses in the areas of competitive position.
3. Stage Three – Implementing an emergency action plan: If the organization is in a critical
stage, an appropriate action plan must be developed to stop the bleeding and enable the
organization to survive.
4. Stage Four – Restructuring the business: If the core business is irreparably damaged, then
the outlook for the entire organization may be bleak. Efforts to be made to position the
organization for rapid improvement.
5. Stage Five – Returning to normal: In the final stage of turnaround strategy process, the
organization should begin to show signs of profitability, return on investments and
enhancing economic value-added.
Divestment Strategy
Divestment strategy involves the sale or liquidation of a portion of business, or a major division,
profit centre or SBU. Divestment is usually a part of rehabilitation or restructuring plan and is
adopted when a turnaround has been attempted but has proved to be unsuccessful.
1. A business that had been acquired proves to be a mismatch and cannot be integrated within
the company.
2. Persistent negative cash flows from a particular business create financial problems for the
whole company, creating the need for divestment of that business.
3. Severity of competition and the inability of a firm to cope with it may cause it to divest.
4. It is not possible for the business to do Technological upgradation that is required for the
business to survive, a preferable option would be to divest.
5. A better alternative may be available for investment, causing a firm to divest a part of its
unprofitable business.
1. This strategy involves divestment of some of the activities in a given business of the firm
or sell-out of some of the businesses as such.
2. Divestment is to be viewed as an integral part of corporate strategy without any stigma
attached.
Strategic Options
Competitive advantage is the position of a firm to maintain and sustain a favourable market
position when compared to the competitors. Competitive advantage is ability to offer buyers
something different and thereby providing more value for the money.
The Ansoff’s product market growth matrix (proposed by Igor Ansoff) is a useful tool that helps
businesses decide their product and market growth strategy.
Matrix can be used for both new or existing product in both new and existing market.
Market Penetration:
1. Market penetration refers to a growth strategy where the business focuses on selling
existing products into existing markets.
2. It is achieved by making more sales to present customers without changing products in any
major way.
3. Penetration might require greater spending on advertising or personal selling.
4. Overcoming competition in a mature market requires an aggressive promotional campaign,
supported by a pricing strategy designed to make the market unattractive for competitors
5. Penetration is also done by effort on increasing usage by existing customers.
6. For example, Gucci, a luxury clothing brand, selling its luxury clothing in European markets
with new designs, is market penetration.
Market Development:
1. Market development refers to a growth strategy where the business seeks to sell its
existing products into new markets.
2. It is a strategy for company growth by identifying and developing new markets for current
company products.
3. This strategy may be achieved through new geographical markets, new product dimensions
or packaging, new distribution channels or different pricing policies to attract different
customers or create new market segments.
4. For example, Gucci, a luxury clothing brand, selling its luxury clothing in Chinese markets, is
market development.
Product Development:
1. Product development refers to a growth strategy where business aims to introduce new
products into existing markets.
2. It is a strategy for company growth by offering modified or new products to current
markets.
3. This strategy may require the development of new competencies and requires the business
to develop modified products which can appeal to existing markets.
4. For example, Gucci, a luxury clothing brand, selling casual clothing in European markets, is
product development.
Diversification:
1. Diversification refers to a growth strategy where a business markets new products in new
markets.
2. It is a strategy by starting up or acquiring businesses outside the company’s current
products and markets.
3. This strategy is risky because it does not rely on either the company’s successful product
or its position in established markets.
4. Typically, the business is moving into markets in which it has little or no experience.
5. For example, Gucci, a luxury clothing brand, selling casual clothing in Chinese markets, is
diversification.
6. As market conditions change overtime, a company may shift product-market growth
strategies. For example, when its present market is fully saturated a company may have no
choice other than to pursue new market.
ADL Matrix
1. The ADL matrix (derived its name from Arthur D. Little) is a portfolio analysis technique
that is based on product life cycle.
2. The approach forms a two-dimensional matrix based on stage of industry maturity and the
firms competitive position, environmental assessment and business strength assessment.
3. Stage of industry maturity is an environmental measure that represents a position in
industry’s life cycle.
4. Competitive position is a measure of business strengths that helps in categorization of
products or SBU’s into one of five competitive positions
1. Dominant: This is a comparatively rare position and in many cases is attributable either to a
monopoly or a strong and protected technological leadership.
2. Strong: By virtue of this position, the firm has a considerable degree of freedom over its
choice of strategies and is often able to act without its market position being unduly
threatened by its competitions.
3. Favourable: This position, which generally comes about when the industry is fragmented and
no one competitor stand out clearly, results in the market leaders a reasonable degree of
freedom.
4. Tenable: Although the firms within this category are able to perform satisfactorily and can
justify staying in the industry, they are generally vulnerable in the face of increased
competition from stronger and more proactive companies in the market.
5. Weak: The performance of firms in this category is generally unsatisfactory although the
opportunities for improvement do exist.
Growth share matrix also known for its cow and dog metaphors is popularly used for resource
allocation in a diversified company. Using the BCG approach, a company classifies its different
businesses on a two-dimensional growth-share matrix.
In the matrix:
⧫ The vertical axis represents market growth rate and provides a measure of market
attractiveness.
⧫ The horizontal axis represents relative market share and serves as a measure of company
strength in the market.
Stars are products or SBUs that are growing rapidly. They also need heavy investment to maintain
their position and finance their rapid growth potential. They represent best opportunities for
expansion.
Cash Cows are low-growth, high market share businesses or products. They generate cash and have
low costs. They are established, successful, and need less investment to maintain their market
share. In long run when the growth rate slows down, stars become cash cows.
Question Marks, sometimes called problem children or wildcats, are low market share business in
high-growth markets. They require a lot of cash to hold their share. They need heavy investments
with low potential to generate cash.
Dogs are low-growth, low-share businesses and products. They may generate enough cash to
maintain themselves, but do not have much future. Sometimes they may need cash to survive. Dogs
should be minimised by means of divestment or liquidation.
After a firm, has classified its products or SBUs, it must determine what role each will play in the
future. The four strategies that can be pursued are:
1. Build: Here the objective is to increase market share, even by forgoing short-term earnings
in favour of building a strong future with large market share.
2. Hold: Here the objective is to preserve market share.
3. Harvest: Here the objective is to increase short-term cash flow regardless of long-term
effect.
4. Divest: Here the objective is to sell or liquidate the business because resources can be
better used elsewhere.
The strategic planning approach in this model has been inspired from traffic control lights.
The vertical axis indicates market attractiveness, and the horizontal axis shows the business
strength in the industry.
If a product falls in the green section, the business is at advantageous position. To reap the
benefits, the strategic decision can be to expand, to invest and grow.
Yellow Zone:
If a product is in the amber or yellow zone, it needs caution and managerial discretion is called for
making the strategic choices.
Red Zone:
If a product is in the red zone, it will eventually lead to losses that would make things difficult for
organisations. In such cases, the appropriate strategy should be retrenchment, divestment or
liquidation.
Firstly, market attractiveness replaces market growth as the dimension of industry attractiveness
and includes a broader range of factors other than just the market growth rate.
Secondly, competitive strength replaces market share as the dimension by which the competitive
position of each SBU is assessed.
Introduction
The strategic management process is dynamic and continuous. A change in anyone of the major
components in the model can necessitate a change in any or all of the other components.
Strategy formulation, implementation, and evaluation activities should be performed on a
continual basis, not just at the end of the year or semi-annually.
1. Developing a strategic vision and formulation of statement of mission, goals and objectives.
2. Environmental and organisational analysis.
3. Formulation of strategy.
4. Implementation of strategy.
5. Strategic evaluation and control
Strategic Vision:
Mission:
Objective-Setting Process:
Hierarchy of Objectives:
This stage is the diagnostic phase of strategic analysis. It entails two types of analysis:
1. Environmental scanning
2. Organisational analysis
The External environment of a firm consists of economic, social, technological, market and other
forces which affect its functioning. The firm’s external environment is dynamic and uncertain. So,
the management must systematically be analysed various elements of environment to determine
opportunities and threats for the firm in future.
The first step in strategy formulation is developing strategic alternatives in the light of
organisation strengths and weaknesses, and opportunities and threats in the environment.
The second step is the deep analysis of various strategic alternatives for the purpose of choosing
the most appropriate alternative which will serve as the strategy of the firm.
1. Should the company continue in the same business carrying on the same volume of
activities?
2. If it should continue in the same business, should it grow by expanding the existing units or
by establishing new units or by acquiring other units in the industry?
3. If it should diversify, should it diversify into related areas or unrelated areas?
4. Should it get out of an existing business fully or partially?
It is the most demanding and time-consuming part of the strategy management process.
To convert strategic plans into actions and results, a manager must be able to direct organisational
change, motivate people, build and strengthen company competencies and competitive capabilities,
create a strategy supportive work climate, and meet or beat performance targets.
1. Developing budgets that steer ample resources into those activities critical to strategic
success.
2. Staffing the organisation with the needed skills and expertise, consciously building and
strengthening strategy-supportive competencies and competitive capabilities and organising
the work effort.
3. Ensuring that policies and operating procedures facilitate rather than impede effective
execution.
4. Using the best-known practices to perform core business activities and pushing for
continuous improvement.
5. Installing information and operating systems that enable company personnel to better carry
out their strategic roles day in and day out.
6. Motivating people to pursue the target objectives energetically.
7. Creating a company culture and work climate conducive to successful strategy
implementation and execution.
8. Exerting the internal leadership needed to drive implementation forward and keep
improving strategy execution. When the organisation encounters stumbling blocks or
weaknesses, management has to see that they are addressed and rectified quickly.
Good strategy execution involves creating strong “fits” between strategy and organisational
capabilities, between strategy and the reward structure, between strategy and internal
operating systems, and between strategy and the organisation’s work climate and culture.
1. Evaluate progress, assess external impacts, and make adjustments in the last stage of
strategic management.
2. If company direction aligns well with industry conditions and targets are met, executives
may continue without major changes.
3. Disruptive external changes prompt questions about the appropriateness of direction and
strategy.
4. Downturns or performance shortfalls require investigation into poor strategy, execution, or
both, with timely corrective action.
5. Revisit company direction, objectives, and strategy based on changing external or internal
conditions.
6. Proficient strategy execution comes from organizational learning.
7. Assess what's working well and what needs improvement periodically.
8. Vigilantly search for ways to improve strategy execution continuously and make corrective
CA Inter with CA Himanshu
adjustments whenever and wherever useful.
Strategy Formulation
Strategic Planning: The game plan that really directs the company towards success is called
“corporate strategy”. The success of the company depends on how well this game plan works.
Because of this, the core of the process of strategic planning is the formation of corporate
strategy.
The formation of corporate strategy is the result of a process known as strategic planning.
1. Strategic planning is the process of determining the objectives of the firm, resources
required to attain these objectives and formulation of policies to govern the acquisition, use
and disposition of resources.
2. Strategic planning involves a fact of interactive and overlapping decisions leading to the
development of an effective strategy for the firm.
3. Strategic planning determines where an organisation is going over the next year or more and
the ways for going there.
4. The process is organisation-wide or focused on a major function such as a division or other
major function.
Strategic uncertainty refers to the unpredictability and unpredictability of future events and
circumstances that can impact an organization's strategy and goals.
It is useful to assess the importance of each cluster in order to set priorities with respect to
Information gathering and analysis.
1. Flexibility: Organizations can build flexibility into their strategies to quickly adapt to
changes in the environment.
2. Diversification: Diversifying the organization's product portfolio, markets, and customer
base can reduce the impact of strategic uncertainty.
3. Monitoring and Scenario Planning: Organizations can regularly monitor key indicators of
change and conduct scenario planning to understand how different future scenarios might
impact their strategies.
4. Building Resilience: Organizations can invest in building internal resilience, such as
strengthening their operational processes, increasing their financial flexibility, and
improving their risk management capabilities.
5. Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborating with other organizations, suppliers,
customers, and partners can help organizations pool resources, share risk, and gain access
to new markets and technologies.
Strategy Implementation
Strategy implementation is the hands-on process where managers put a chosen strategy into
action. It involves overseeing and improving the strategy's execution to achieve measurable
results. This phase translates strategic decisions into practical steps, considering feasibility. It
also requires allocating resources, adapting the organization, training personnel, and developing
systems for effective implementation. Ultimately, strategy implementation is about turning
strategic plans into successful actions.
Square A
Company apparently has formulated a very competitive strategy but is showing difficulties in
implementing it successfully. This can be due to various factors, such as the lack of experience
(e.g. for startups), the lack of resources, missing leadership and so on.
Square B
The ideal situation where a company has succeeded in designing a sound and competitive strategy
and has been successful in implementing it.
Square C
It denotes for companies that haven’t succeeded in coming up with a sound strategy formulation
and in addition are bad at implementing their flawed strategic model. Their path to success also
goes through business model redesign and implementation/execution readjustment.
Square D
This is the situation where the strategy formulation is flawed, but the company is showing
excellent implementation skills. When a company finds itself in square D the first thing, they have
to do is to redesign their strategy before readjusting their implementation/execution skills.
Strategy’ is not synonymous with ‘long-term plan’ but rather consists of an enterprise’s attempts to
reach some preferred future state by adapting its competitive position as circumstances change.
While a series of strategic moves may be planned, competitors’ actions will mean that the actual
moves will have to be modified to take account of those actions.
In organizations that lack strategic direction there has been a tendency to look inwards in times of
stress, and for management to devote their attention to cost cutting and to shedding unprofitable
divisions. In other words, the focus has been on efficiency (i.e., the relationship between inputs
and outputs, usually with a short time horizon) rather than on effectiveness (which is concerned
with the attainment of organisational goals - including that of desired competitive position). While
efficiency is essentially introspective, effectiveness highlights the links between the organization
and its environment. The responsibility for efficiency lies with operational managers, with top
management having the primary responsibility for the strategic orientation of the organization.
1. Cell 1 is well placed and thrives, since it is achieving what it aspires to achieve with an efficient
output/input ratio.
2. In contrast, an organization in cell 2 or 4 is doomed, unless it can establish some strategic
direction.
3. 2 is a worse place to be than is cell 3 since, in the latter, the strategic direction is present to
ensure effectiveness
“To be effective is to do the right thing, while to be efficient is to do the thing right.”
The division of strategic management into different phases is only for the purpose of orderly
study. In real life, the formulation and implementation processes are intertwined.
Two types of linkages exist between these two phases of strategic management.
• The forward linkages deal with the impact of strategy formulation on strategy
implementation while
• The backward linkages are concerned with the impact in the opposite direction.
Forward Linkages: The different elements in strategy formulation starting with objective setting
through environmental and organizational appraisal, strategic alternatives and choice to the
strategic plan determine the course that an organization adopts for itself. With the formulation of
new strategies, or reformulation of existing strategies, many changes have to be affected within
the organization. For instance, the organizational structure has to undergo a change in the light of
the requirements of the modified or new strategy. The style of leadership has to be adapted to
the needs of the modified or new strategies. In this way, the formulation of strategies has
forward linkages with their implementation.
7. Resource Allocation for Projects: Implementation involves more than planning; it requires
allocating resources, designing organizational structures, installing systems, formulating
policies, and providing necessary behavioural inputs.
8. Comprehensive Approach: Successful implementation goes beyond formulating plans,
encompassing resources, organizational structures, systems, policies, and behavioural aspects
to ensure effective strategy execution.
Given below in sequential manner the issues in strategy implementation which are to be considered:
1. Project implementation
2. Procedural implementation
3. Resource allocation
4. Structural implementation
5. Functional implementation
6. Behavioural implementation
Strategic Change
The changes in the environmental forces often require businesses to make modifications in their
existing strategies and bring out new strategies. Strategic change is a complex process that
involves a corporate strategy focused on new markets, products, services and new ways of doing
business.
Steps to initiate strategic change: For initiating strategic change, three steps can be identified
as under:
1. Recognize the need for change: The first step is to diagnose which facets of the present
corporate culture are strategy supportive and which are not. This basically means going for
environmental scanning involving appraisal of both internal and external capabilities may be
through SWOT analysis and then determining where the lacuna lies and scope for change
exists.
2. Create a shared vision to manage change: Objectives of both individuals and organization
should coincide. There should be no conflict between them. This is possible only if the
management and the organization members follow a shared vision. Senior managers need to
constantly and consistently communicate the vision to all the organizational members. They
have to convince all those concerned that the change in business culture is not superficial or
cosmetic. The actions taken have to be credible, highly visible and unmistakably indicative of
management’s seriousness to new strategic initiatives and associated changes.
3. Institutionalise the change: This is basically an action stage which requires implementation
of changed strategy. Creating and sustaining a different attitude towards change is essential
to ensure that the firm does not slip back into old ways of thinking or doing things. Capacity
for self-renewal should be a fundamental anchor of the new culture of the firm. Besides,
change process must be regularly monitored and reviewed to analyse the after-effects of
change. Any discrepancy or deviation should be brought to the notice of persons concerned so
that the necessary corrective actions are taken. It takes time for the changed culture to
prevail.
To make the change lasting, Kurt Lewin proposed three phases of the change process for moving the
organization from the present to the future. These stages are:
1. Unfreezing
2. Changing and
3. Refreezing
1. Unfreezing the situation: The process of unfreezing simply makes the individuals aware of
the necessity for change and prepares them for such a change. Lewin proposes that the
changes should not come as a surprise to the members of the organization. Sudden and
unannounced change would be socially destructive and morale lowering. The management must
pave the way for the change by first “unfreezing the situation”, so that members would be
willing and ready to accept the change. Unfreezing is the process of breaking down the old
attitudes and behaviours, customs and traditions so that they start with a clean slate. This
can be achieved by making announcements, holding meetings and promoting the new ideas
throughout the organization.
2. Changing to the new situation: Once the unfreezing process has been completed and the
members of the organization recognise the need for change and have been fully prepared to
accept such change, their behaviour patterns need to be redefined. H.C. Kellman has
proposed three methods for
• Compliance: It is achieved by strictly enforcing the reward and punishment strategy for
good or bad behaviour. Fear of punishment, actual punishment or actual reward seems to
change behaviour for the better.
• Identification: Identification occurs when members are psychologically impressed upon
to identify themselves with some given role models whose behaviour they would like to
adopt and try to become like them.
• Internalization: Internalization involves some internal changing of the individual’s
thought processes in order to adjust to the changes introduced. They have given
freedom to learn and adopt new behaviour in order to succeed in the new set of
circumstances.
3. Refreezing: Refreezing occurs when the new behaviour becomes a normal way of life. The
new behaviour must replace the former behaviour completely for successful and permanent
change to take place. In order for the new behaviour to become permanent, it must be
continuously reinforced so that this new acquired behaviour does not diminish or extinguish.
Change process is not a one-time application but a continuous process due to dynamism and
ever-changing environment. The process of unfreezing, changing and refreezing is a cyclical
one and remains continuously in action.
The use of digital technologies to develop fresh, improved, or entirely new company procedures,
goods, or services is known as "digital transformation
The five best practices for managing change in small and medium-sized businesses are:
1. Begin at the top: A focused, invested, united leadership that is on the same page about the
company's future is reflected in change that begins at the top. The culture that will
motivate the rest of the organisation to accept change can only be generated and promoted
in this way.
2. Ensure that the change is both necessary and desired: The fact that decision-makers
are unaware of how to properly handle a digital transformation and the effects it will have
on their firm is one of the main causes of this. If a corporation doesn’t have a sound
strategy in place, introducing too much too fast can frequently become a major issue down
the road.
3. Reduce disruption: Employee perceptions of what is required or desirable change can differ
by department, rank, or performance history. It's crucial to lessen how changes affect
staff. The introduction of new tactics or technologies intended to improve management and
corporate operations causes employee concern about change. It is possible to reduce
workplace disruption by:
a. Getting the word out early and preparing for some interruption.
b. Giving staff members the knowledge and tools, they need to adjust to change.
c. Creating an environment that encourages transformation or change.
d. Empowering change agents to provide context and clarity for changes, such as project
managers or team leaders.
e. Ensuring that IT department is informed of changes in technology or infrastructure
and is prepared to support them.
4. Encourage communication: Create channels so that workers may contact you with queries or
complaints. Encourage departmental collaboration to propagate ideas and innovations as new
procedures take root. Communication promotes efficiency and has the power to influence
culture, just like your vision. The people who will be affected the most by these changes are
reassured that they are not in danger through effective communication, which keeps
everyone on the same page.
5. Recognize that change is the norm, not the exception: Change readiness may be defined
as “the ability to continuously initiate and respond to change in ways that create advantage,
minimize risk, and sustain performance.” In order to keep up with the customers, businesses
must also adapt their
operations. They must prepare for change in advance and expect them. It may run into
difficulties because change is not a project but rather an ongoing process.
Begin at the Top: Focused, invested, united leadership reflects change starting
at the top.
A united leadership promotes a culture encouraging the
acceptance of change.
Ensure that the change Decision-makers' awareness of handling digital
is both necessary and transformation is crucial.
desired: Lack of a sound strategy can lead to challenges with
introducing too much change too quickly.
Reduce Disruption: Employee perceptions of necessary change may vary.
Strategies to reduce workplace disruption:
• Early communication and preparation for disruption.
• Providing knowledge and tools for staff to adjust.
Here are some pointers for navigating change during the digital transformation:
1. Specify the digital transformation’s aims and objectives: What is the intended outcome?
What are the precise objectives that must be accomplished? It will be easier to make sure
that everyone is on the same page and pursuing the same aims if everyone has a clear grasp
of the goals.
2. Always, always, always communicate: It might be challenging for people to accept change
and adjust to it. Ensure that you routinely and honestly discuss the objectives of the digital
transformation and how they will affect stakeholders, including employees, clients, and other
parties.
3. Be ready for resistance: Even when a change is for the better, it can be challenging for
people to embrace it. Have a strategy in place for dealing with any resistance that may arise.
4. Implement changes gradually: Changes should ideally be implemented gradually rather than
all at once. In order to avoid overwhelming individuals with too much change at once, this will
give people time to become used to the new way of doing things.
5. Offer assistance and training: Workers will need guidance in the new procedures, software
applications, etc.
Organisational Framework
The McKinsey 7S Model refers to a tool that analyses a company’s “organizational design.”
The goal of the model is to depict “how effectiveness can be achieved in an organization
through the interactions of hard and soft elements.’
The McKinsey 7s Model focuses on how the "Soft Ss" and "Hard Ss" elements are interrelated,
suggesting that modifying one aspect might have a ripple effect on the other elements in order to
maintain an effective balance.
The Hard elements are directly controlled by the management. The following elements are the
hard elements in an organization.
1. Strategy: The direction of the organization, a blueprint to build on a core competency and
achieve competitive advantage to drive margins and lead the industry
2. Structure: depending on the availability of resources and the degree of centralisation or
decentralization that the management desires, it choses from the available alternatives of
organizational structures.
3. Systems: The development of daily tasks, operations and teams to execute the goals and
objectives in the most efficient and effective manner.
The Soft elements are difficult to define as they are more governed by the culture. But these
soft elements are equally important in determining an organization’s success as well as growth in
the industry. The following are the soft elements in this model;
1. Shared Values: The core values which get reflected within the organizational culture or
influence the code of ethics of the management.
2. Style: This depicts the leadership style and how it influences the strategic decisions of the
organisation. It also revolves around people motivation and organizational delivery of goals.
3. Staff: The talent pool of the organisation.
4. Skills: The core competencies or the key skills of the employees play a vital role in defining
the organizational success.
1. It ignores the importance of the external environment and depicts only the most crucial
elements within the organization.
2. The model does not clearly explain the concept of organizational effectiveness or
performance.
3. The model is considered to be more static and less flexible for decision making.
4. It is generally criticized for missing out the real gaps in conceptualization and execution of
strategy.
Organisation Structure
Changes in corporate strategy often require changes in the way an organization is structured
for two major reasons.
1. First, the way a company is organized (structure) is crucial for setting goals and rules to
achieve its plans. For example, if the organization is arranged by location, goals and rules
will be about different places. If it's organized by product groups, goals and rules will be
about those products. This structure also affects how strategies are put into.
2. Second, the structure determines how resources are distributed to meet strategic goals.
If the organization is structured around customer groups, resources are allocated based on
those groups. Similarly, if the structure follows functional business lines, resources are
distributed according to functional areas.
4. No universal optimal design; appropriateness varies among firms in the same industry.
5. Examples of structures: Consumer goods use divisional structure-by-product, small firms
are functionally structured, medium-size firms are divisionally structured, and large firms
use SBU or matrix.
6. Organizational structures evolve from simple to complex with growth and strategy
integration.
7. External and internal forces influence firms, but addressing each force through structural
changes would cause chaos.
8. Changes in strategy may make existing structures ineffective, with symptoms like excessive
levels of management and meetings.
9. Organizational structure can facilitate strategy implementation but won't turn a bad
strategy, managers, or products successful.
10. Different types of organizational structures include functional, divisional geography
/product/ customer, divisional process, SBU, and matrix.
1. Simple Structure
2. Functional Structure
3. Divisional Structure
4. Multi Divisional Structure
5. Strategic Business Unit (SBU) Structure
6. Matrix Structure
7. Network Structure
8. Hourglass Structure
1. Simple Structure
2. Functional Structure
1. Functional structure is widely used in business organizations due to its simplicity and cost-
effectiveness.
2. Tasks and activities are grouped by business function, such as production, marketing,
finance, research and development, and management information systems.
3. Promotes specialization of labour, encourages efficiency, minimizes the need for an
elaborate control system, and allows rapid decision-making.
4. Structure includes a CEO or managing director, supported by corporate staff and functional
line managers in dominant functions.
5. Overcomes growth-related constraints of the simple structure, facilitating communication
and coordination.
6. Potential problems compared to the simple structure include communication and coordination
challenges due to differences in functional specialization and orientation.
7. CEO must integrate functional decision-making and coordinate actions across functions.
8. Functional specialists may develop a narrow perspective, losing sight of the company's
strategic vision and mission.
9. To overcome these issues, the multidivisional structure can be implemented.
3. Divisional Structure
1. Growth challenges for firms lead to the need for a divisional structure for effective
management of diverse products and services in various markets.
4. Multi-Division Structure
1. It is a single business or a collection of related businesses which offer scope for independent
planning and which might feasibly standalone from the rest of the organization.
2. It has its own set of competitors.
3. It has a manager who has responsibility for strategic planning and profit performance, and
who has control of profit-influencing factors.
The SBU structure is composed of operating units where each unit represents a separate business
to which the top corporate officer delegates responsibility for day-to-day operations and business
unit strategy to its managers.
By such delegation, the corporate office is responsible for formulating and implementing overall
corporate strategy and manages SBUs through strategic and financial controls.
Hence, the SBU structure groups similar products into strategic business units and delegates
authority and responsibility for each unit to a senior executive who reports directly to the chief
executive office.
A strategic business unit (SBU) structure consists of at least three levels, with a corporate
headquarters at the top, SBU groups at the second level, and divisions grouped by relatedness
within each SBU at the third level.
The attributes of an SBU and the benefits a firm may derive by using the SBU Structure are
as follows:
1. A scientific method of grouping the businesses of a multi – business corporation which helps
the firm in strategic planning.
2. An improvement over the territorial grouping of businesses and strategic planning based on
territorial units.
3. Unrelated products/businesses in any group are separated. If they could be assigned to any
other SBU applying the criterion of functional relation, they are assigned; accordingly,
otherwise they are made into separate SBUs.
4. Strategic planning for SBU is distinct from rest of businesses. Products/ businesses within
an SBU receive same strategic planning treatment and priorities.
5. Each SBU will have its own distinct set of competitors and its own distinct strategy.
6. The CEO of SBU will be responsible for strategic planning for SBU and its profit
performance.
7. Products/businesses that are related from the stand point of function are assembled
together as a distinct SBU.
8. Grouping the businesses on SBU lines helps in strategic planning by removing the vagueness
and confusion.
9. Each SBU is a separate business and will be distinct from one another on the basis of mission,
objectives etc.
At the corporate level, the main questions are whether the company wants a group of related
business units (SBUs) and, if so, what basis will be used for this decision. The concept of
relatedness directly influences choices about diversification, and relatedness can manifest in
different ways:
6. Matrix Structure
The matrix structure, in contrast, may be very appropriate when organizations conclude that neither
functional nor divisional forms, even when combined with horizontal linking mechanisms like strategic
business units, are right for the implementation of their strategies.
The matrix structure is often found in an organization or within an SBU when the following three
conditions exists:
For development of matrix structure Davis and Lawrence, have proposed three distinct phases:
1. Cross-functional task forces: Temporary cross-functional task forces are initially used
when a new product line is being introduced. A project manager is in charge as the key
horizontal link.
3. Mature matrix: The third and final phase of matrix development involves a true dual-
authority structure. Both the functional and product structures are permanent. All
employees are connected to both a vertical functional superior and a horizontal product
manager. Functional and product managers have equal authority and must work well together
to resolve disagreements over
resources and priorities.
7. Network Structure
The network structure becomes most useful when the environment of a firm is unstable and is
expected to remain so.
Under such conditions, there is usually a strong need for innovation and quick response. Instead
of having salaried employees, it may contract with people for a specific project or length of
time.
Long-term contracts with suppliers and distributors replace services that the company could
provide for itself through vertical integration.
The network structure provides organization with increased flexibility and adaptability to cope
with rapid technological change and shifting pattern of international trade and competition.
8. Hourglass Structure
In the recent years information technology and communications have significantly altered the
functioning of organizations. The role played by middle management is diminishing as the tasks
performed by them are increasingly being replaced by the technological tools. Hourglass
organization structure consists of three layers in an organisation structure with constricted
middle layer. The structure has a short and narrow middle management level.
Information technology links the top and bottom levels in the organization taking away many
tasks that are performed by the middle level managers. A shrunken middle layer coordinates
diverse lower-level activities.
Hourglass structure has obvious benefit of reduced costs. It also helps in enhancing
responsiveness by simplifying decision making. Decision making authority is shifted close to the
source of information so that it is faster. However, with the reduced size of middle
management, the promotion opportunities for the lower levels diminish significantly.
Organisation Culture
Corporate culture refers to a company’s values, beliefs, business principles, traditions, way of
operating and internal work environment. Every corporation has a culture that exerts powerful
influences on the behaviour of managers.
Culture as a strength – Culture can facilitate communication, decision making and control and
create cooperation and commitment. An organisation’s culture could be strong and cohesive when it
conducts its business according to clear and explicit set of principles and values. The management
devotes considerable time in communicating values & principles to employees and sharing them
widely across the organisation.
Changing problem cultures is very difficult because of deeply held values and habits. It takes
concerted management action over a period of time to replace an unhealthy culture with a healthy
culture or to root out certain unwanted cultural obstacles and instil ones that are more strategy-
supportive.
1. The first step is to diagnose which facets of the present culture are strategy
supportive and which are not.
2. Then, managers have to talk openly and forthrightly to all concerned about those
aspects of the culture that have to be changed.
3. The talk has to be followed swiftly by visible, aggressive actions to modify the
culture-actions that everyone will understand are intended to establish a new culture
more in tune with the strategy.
Management through communication has to create a shared vision to manage changes. The menu of
culture-changing actions includes revising policies and procedures, altering incentive compensation,
shifting budgetary allocations for substantial resources to new strategy projects, recruiting and
hiring new managers and employees, replacing key executives, communication on need and benefit
to employees and so on.
Incorrect, every company has its own organisational culture. Each has its own business philosophy
and principles, its own ways of approaching to the problems and making decisions, its own work
climate, work ethics, etc. Therefore, corporate culture is not identical in all organisations.
Organisations over a period of time inherit and percolate down its own specific work ethos and
approaches.
Strategic Leadership
Strategic leadership sets the firms direction by developing and communicating vision of future,
formulate strategies in the light of internal and external environment, brings about changes
required to implement strategies and inspire the staff to contribute to strategy execution.
A manager as a strategic leader has many different leadership roles to play: visionary, chief
entrepreneur and strategist, chief administrator, culture builder, resource acquirer and allocator,
capabilities builder, process integrator, crisis solver, spokesperson, negotiator, motivator,
arbitrator, policy maker an so on. Managers have five leadership roles to play in pushing for good
strategy execution:
1. Staying on top of what is happening, closely monitoring progress, working through issues and
obstacles.
2. Promoting a culture that mobilizes and energizes organizational members to execute
strategy and perform at a high level.
3. Keeping the organization responsive to changing conditions, alert for new opportunities and
remain ahead of rivals in developing competitively valuable competencies and capabilities.
4. Ethical leadership and insisting that the organization conduct its affairs like a model
corporate citizen.
5. Pushing corrective actions to improve strategy execution and overall strategic performance.
The strategic leaders must be able to use the strategic management process effectively by guiding
the company in ways that result in the formation of strategic intent and strategic mission,
facilitating the development and implementation of appropriate strategic plans and providing
guidance to the employees for achieving strategic goals.
Type of Leadership
Transformational leadership style uses charisma and enthusiasm to inspire people to exert them
for the good of the organization. Transformational leadership style may be appropriate in
turbulent environments, in industries at the very start or end of their life-cycles, in poorly
performing organizations when there is a need to inspire a company to embrace major changes.
Transactional leadership style focuses more on designing systems and controlling the
organization’s activities and are more likely to be associated with improving the current situation.
Transactional leaders try to build on the existing culture and enhance current practices.
Transactional leadership style uses the authority of its office to exchange rewards, such as pay
and status They prefer a more formalized approach to motivation, setting clear goals with explicit
rewards or penalties for achievement or non-achievement.
Transactional leadership style may be appropriate in static environment, in mature industries, and
in organizations that are performing well. The style is better suited in persuading people to work
efficiently and run operations smoothly.
Strategic Control
Controlling is one of the important functions of management and is often regarded as the core of
the management process. It is a function intended to ensure and make possible the performance of
planned activities and to achieve the predetermined goals and results.
1. Objectives of the business system which could be operationalized into measurable and
controllable standards.
2. A mechanism for monitoring and measuring the performance of the system.
3. A mechanism (i) for comparing the actual results with reference to the standards (ii) for
detecting deviations from standards and (iii) for learning new insights on standards
themselves.
4. A mechanism for feeding back corrective and adaptive information and instructions to the
system, for effecting the desired changes to set right the system to keep it on course.
1. Operational control,
2. Management control and
3. Strategic control.
Operational Control
The thrust of operational control is on individual tasks or transactions as against total or more
aggregative management functions. For example, procuring specific items for inventory is a matter
of operational control, in contrast to inventory management as a whole. One of the tests that can
be applied to identify operational control areas is that there should be a clear-cut and somewhat
measurable relationship between inputs and outputs which could be predetermined or estimated
with least uncertainty.
Many of the control systems in organisations are operational and mechanistic in nature. A set of
standards, plans and instructions are formulated. The control activity consists of regulating the
processes within certain ‘tolerances’, irrespective of the effects of external conditions on the
formulated standards, plans and instructions.
Management Control
When compared with operational control, management control is more inclusive and more
aggregative, in the sense of embracing the integrated activities of a complete department, division
or even entire organisation, instead or mere narrowly circumscribed activities of sub-units.
The basic purpose of management control is the achievement of enterprise goals – short range and
long range – in a most effective and efficient manner.
Strategic Control
Strategic control is the process of evaluating formulated and implemented strategy. It is directed
towards identifying changes in the internal and external environments of the organization and
making necessary adjustments accordingly.
It is neither feasible nor desirable to control all types of premises in the same manner.
Different premises may require different amount of control. Thus, managers are
required to select those premises that are likely to change and would severely impact the
functioning of the organization and its strategy.
• Firstly, there needs to be a clear cause and effect relationship between the
indicators and strategic outcomes.
• Secondly, KPIs need to be carefully chosen because they will influence the behaviour
of people within the organisation.
People involved in the planning process for the implementation of a strategy may be affected by
two sets of forces:
The "rational" forces of openness, communication, and self-analysis can exist on the one hand.
On the other hand, there could be political forces concerned with preserving empires and
fostering internal rivalry that urge knowledge retention, selective communication, and caution.
When these two techniques conflict, the politically acceptable aspects may end up in the explicit
strategy while the sensitive elements may form an unspoken plan that contains the implicit
strategy.
Strategic performance measures are essential for organizations for several reasons:
1. Goal Alignment: Strategic performance measures help organizations align their strategies
with their goals and objectives, ensuring that they are on track to achieve their desired
outcomes.
Organizations should choose strategic performance measures that are aligned with their goals and
objectives and that provide relevant and actionable information. In selecting the right measures,
organizations should consider the following factors:
1. Relevance: The measure should be relevant to the organization's goals and objectives and
provide information that is actionable and meaningful.
2. Data Availability: The measure should be based on data that is readily available and can be
collected and analysed in a timely manner.
3. Data Quality: The measure should be based on high-quality data that is accurate and
reliable.
4. Data Timeliness: The measure should be based on data that is current and up-to-date,
enabling organizations to make informed decisions in a timely manner.