Compilation CA Polity April 2024 Lyst1714812593282
Compilation CA Polity April 2024 Lyst1714812593282
Electoral Dynamics
Postal Ballots
Context:
• In view of the Lok Sabha elections and Assembly polls in four States (Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal
Pradesh, Odisha and Sikkim), Election Commission of India (ECI) recently notified the category of
electors mentioned for the purpose of facility of voting through postal ballot as absentee voters in the
category of persons employed on essential services.
• The list includes the employees of Metro, Railways, BSNL Electricity and Health Department, Fire
Services, Postal Services, Aviation, Disaster Management, Doordarshan and All India Radio and media
persons authorized by the Commission for polling day coverage.
Background:
• Provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 allow notified persons by the Election
Commission of India to cast vote by postal ballot.
Analysis for Prelims:
About Postal voting:
• Postal voting, also known as absentee voting, enables electors to cast their ballots through mail,
transcending the constraints of physical presence at polling stations.
Eligibility Criteria for Postal Ballots:
• The eligibility criteria for postal ballots vary depending on the specific election and jurisdiction.
However, some common categories of eligible voters include:
• Service voters, comprising armed forces, paramilitary personnel, and government employees deployed
far from their home constituencies.
• Absentee voters, representing individuals away from their home constituencies for work or other
reasons.
• Electors on election duty, encompassing government officials and polling staff assigned duties at
polling stations other than their own.
• Electors under preventive detention, consisting of individuals detained under preventive custody
orders during the election period.
Application Process:
• Eligible voters must submit an application to the Returning Officer (RO) of their respective
constituency.
• The application entails personal details, voter identification information, and the rationale for seeking
a postal ballot.
• Upon verification of eligibility, the RO issues the postal ballot to the applicant.
Process of Postal Voting:
• Receiving the postal ballot: The RO dispatches the postal ballot package, comprising the ballot paper,
declaration form, secrecy sleeve, and return envelope, to the voter's registered address.
• Marking the ballot: Voters cast their votes in secrecy on the ballot paper enclosed within the secrecy
sleeve.
• Completing the declaration form: Voters furnish requisite details and affix their signature on the
declaration form.
• Sealing the envelope: The marked ballot paper and declaration form are sealed within the secrecy
sleeve and placed into the return envelope.
• Returning the postal ballot: Voters mail the sealed return envelope to the designated address within
the stipulated timeframe, with a postage stamp affixed.
Counting of Postal Ballots:
• Postal ballots are counted separately from votes cast at polling stations.
• On the designated counting day, postal ballots are collected by the postal authorities and brought to the
counting center.
• The RO and election officials scrutinize the postal ballots to ensure their validity and integrity.
• Valid postal ballots are then added to the respective candidate's vote count.
Analysis for Mains:
Positives of Postal Voting:
• Accessibility: Enhances electoral participation for individuals unable to physically visit polling stations
due to various reasons.
• Convenience: Allows voters to cast their ballots from the comfort of their homes, avoiding queues and
time constraints associated with in-person voting.
• Inclusivity: Ensures that voters, including those with disabilities or mobility issues, have equal access
to the electoral process.
• Flexibility: Provides flexibility in voting timelines, enabling voters to participate in elections regardless
of their location or schedule.
Negatives of Postal Voting:
• Security Concerns: Risks associated with ballot tampering, interception, or coercion, potentially
compromising the integrity of the electoral process.
• Verification Challenges: Difficulty in verifying the identity of voters and ensuring the authenticity of
postal ballots, leading to concerns about fraudulent voting.
• Delayed Results: Postal voting may result in delayed election results due to the time required for
processing and counting postal ballots, impacting the overall electoral timeline.
• Technological Limitations: Dependence on postal services and paper-based processes may pose
challenges in adapting to modern digital voting technologies and security standards.
Conclusion:
• Postal voting exemplifies inclusivity and accessibility in electoral participation, empowering citizens to
exercise their democratic rights conveniently and securely beyond traditional polling stations.
• However, addressing security concerns and technological limitations is essential to safeguarding the
integrity and credibility of postal voting systems.
Mains Practice Question:
• Discuss the significance of postal ballots in enhancing electoral participation and democratic inclusivity.
(150 words)
cVigil App
Context:
• As per the Election Commission of India, it is keeping a close eye on the election process through the
cVIGIL app.
Background:
• cVIGIL Mobile App was launched by the Election Commission of India in 2018 to enable citizens to
report on violation of election code of conduct.
Analysis for Prelims:
About cVIGIL App:
• It is a single app for recording, reporting, and resolving violations of the model code of conduct.
• Through this app, online complaints regarding violations of the model code of conduct can be made by
capturing photos, videos etc and action within 100 minutes by the authorities is assured.
• The app connects the vigilant citizen with District Control Room, Returning Officer and Field
Verification Unit (Flying Squads / Static Surveillance Teams) thereby, creating a rapid and accurate
reporting, action and monitoring system.
Foolproof Features of the App:
• The application is meant only for Model Code of Conduct Violations.
• The app allows the user 5 minutes to submit an incidence report after having clicked a picture or a
video.
• The app will not allow uploading of the pre-recorded images/ videos.
• The photos/videos clicked via this app cannot be saved in the gallery.
• The application has a feature that allows citizens to file a complaint only in the State where Elections
have been announced.
• Any citizen who has installed cVIGIL will find that the app becomes active only in the States
undergoing elections.
Analysis for Mains:
Benefits of cVIGIL app:
• Convenient Reporting: It provides a convenient and user-friendly platform for citizens to report
instances of model code of conduct violations in their vicinity. Citizens can easily submit pictorial
evidence of electoral malpractices through the app.
• Enhanced Accountability: Each reported incident is meticulously tracked and scrutinized from start to
finish, ensuring accountability within the electoral system.
• Effective Deterrence: The immediate location verification feature of cVIGIL acts as a strong deterrent
against miscreants and wrongdoers. Wrongdoers can be easily tracked, which discourages them from
engaging in unlawful activities during elections.
• Promotion of Civic Engagement: By empowering citizens to report electoral malpractices, it
encourages active participation in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.
• Support for Free and Fair Elections: It contributes to the Election Commission's overall objective of
conducting free and fair elections. The app helps in identifying and addressing violations promptly,
thereby reinforcing the credibility of the electoral process.
What’s up with VVPAT?
Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT)
Context:
• Supreme court has reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions seeking 100% cross verification of vote
count in EVM’s with VVPAT.
Background:
• 2010: The idea of VVPAT machines first emerged during a meeting between the Election Commission
of India (EC) and political parties to discuss improving transparency in the EVM-based polling process.
• 2011:
o A prototype VVPAT machine was developed.
o Field trials of the prototype were conducted in five locations: Ladakh, Thiruvananthapuram,
Cherrapunjee, East Delhi and Jaisalmer.
• 2013:
o After considering feedback from political parties and further trials, an expert committee
approved the final design of the VVPAT machine.
o The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 were amended to allow for the use of VVPATs with EVMs.
o The first-ever election using VVPATs was held in a bye-election from 51-Noksen (ST) Assembly
Constituency of Nagaland.
• By June 2017: VVPATs were adopted in 100% of polling stations across India.
Analysis for Prelims:
About Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail:
• It is an independent system attached with the Electronic Voting Machines that allows the voters to
verify that their votes are cast as intended.
• When a vote is cast, a slip is printed containing:
o The serial number of the candidate.
o The name of the candidate.
o The symbol of the candidate.
• The slip remains exposed through a transparent window for 7 seconds. Thereafter, this printed slip
automatically gets cut and falls in the sealed drop box of the VVPAT.
• VVPAT runs on a power pack battery and not on electricity.
• Only authorized engineers of the manufacturers, namely Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) and
Electronics Corporation of India Limited (ECIL), conduct the First Level Checking (FLC) of EVMs and
VVPATs under control of District Election Officer and direct supervision of Dy. DEO in the presence of
representative of Political Parties under videography.
• Counting of printed paper slips of VVPAT is done only in the following cases:
o Mandatory verification of printed VVPAT paper slips of 1 (one) randomly selected polling
station of:
▪ (a) Assembly Constituency in case of election to State Legislative Assembly.
▪ (b) each Assembly Segment in case of election to the House of the People.
o In case of no display of result from the Control Unit, the printed paper slips of the respective
VVPAT are counted.
o If any candidate, or in his absence, his election agent or any of his counting agents make a
written request to count the printed paper slips of the VVPAT in respect of any polling station
or polling stations under Rule 56 D of the Conduct of Elections Rules 1961, the Returning Officer
taking into consideration various factors decides and issue written orders, whether to count or
not to count the printed paper slips of the VVPAT of that particular polling station(s).
• Note: In February 2018, the Election Commission had mandated the counting of VVPAT slips of 1 (one)
randomly selected polling station per Assembly constituency.
• This was increased to 5 (five) polling stations per Assembly seat, following a Supreme Court judgment
in April 2019 on a petition filed by the leader of a political party.
• The five polling stations are selected by a draw of lots by the Returning Officer concerned, in the
presence of candidates/ their agents.
• The Election Commission of India (ECI) said that it has matched EVM votes with more than 4 crore
VVPAT slips and that there have been no discrepancies recorded so far. Countering claims of
tampering, it asserted that it is impossible to manipulate EVMs “at any stage.”
5 Questions of Supreme Court
• Is the microcontroller installed in the control unit or the VVPAT? SC said it was “under the
impression that microcontroller was installed in the control unit of the EVMs.
• Is the microcontroller installed one-time programmable?
• How many Symbol Loading Units are available with the ECI?
• The limitation period for storing the EVMs was submitted as 30 days in case there were any
election petitions or recounts. However, Section 81 of the Representation of People Act says
the limitation period is 45 days.
• SC said the EVMs include three components - ballot unit, control unit and VVPAT. Are they
stored and sealed together?
Answers :
• All three units of the EVMs have their own individual microcontrollers. They are housed in secure
modules. They are one-time programmes.
• Microcontrollers cannot be accessed physically and have a one-time program burnt into them.
• For symbol loading units, the ECI has two manufacturers – Electronics Corporation of India Limited
(ECIL) and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL).
• There are over 5000 symbol loading units
• EVMs/VVPATs are stored for a statutory period of 45 days after polling.
• On expiry of the period, the Chief Electoral Officer writes to High Courts to ascertain if there are any
election petitions.
• If not, they are taken out of storage
• VVPATs are stored separately from EVMs before polling. After polling, they are stored as a unit.
Analysis for Mains:
Political parties are advocating for widened verification of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) slips
for several reasons:
• Enhancing Electoral Integrity: By expanding the verification of VVPAT slips, the electoral process's
transparency and integrity are bolstered. This additional scrutiny helps build trust among voters that
their ballots are accurately recorded and counted.
• Addressing Suspicions of Electoral Fraud: There are persistent concerns about potential electoral
fraud, including EVM tampering. Broadening VVPAT slip verification allows for a physical audit of
paper trails, providing a crucial safeguard against tampering and malpractice.
• Compliance with Legal Mandates: Demands for widened VVPAT verification align with legal
provisions outlined in the Representation of the People Act. This empowers the Election Commission
of India (ECI) to conduct random verification of VVPAT slips, ensuring EVM accuracy.
• Boosting Public Confidence: Given the paramount importance of credible elections in a democratic
framework, expanded VVPAT verification instils greater confidence among voters. It assures them that
their votes contribute to fair electoral outcomes.
• Fostering Transparency and Accountability: Political parties argue that widened VVPAT verification
fosters transparency and accountability by enabling thorough scrutiny of voting data. This mechanism
upholds democratic principles and ensures electoral processes' integrity.
Conclusion:
• Overall, widened verification of VVPAT slips is seen as a vital measure to safeguard elections'
credibility, address fraud concerns, and uphold citizens' democratic rights to transparent and fair
electoral processes.
Suvidha Platform and app of Election Commission
Background and Analysis:
About Suvidha platform:
• It is a technological solution developed by Election Commission of India to ensure a level playing-field
upholding the democratic principles of free, fair and transparent elections.
o It streamlines the process of obtaining and acting upon requests for permissions and facilities
from political parties and candidates during the election period.
o It caters to a diverse range of permission requests transparently on the First in First Out principle
such as permissions for organizing rallies, opening temporary party offices, door-to-door
canvassing, video vans, helicopters, obtaining vehicle permits, distributing pamphlets etc.
Curative petition
Context:
• The Supreme Court, while listening to a curative petition, ruled that the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
(DMRC) will not have to pay nearly Rs 8,000 crore to the Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited
(DAMEPL), an Infrastructure company, which was awarded by a 2017 arbitral award.
Background and Analysis:
About Curative petition:
• A curative petition is essentially the last resort option available in the Indian legal system to challenge
a final judgment by the Supreme Court.
• The petition as a layer of appeal against a Supreme Court decision is not prescribed in the Constitution
and is a judicial innovation, designed for correcting “grave injustices” in a ruling.
• The Supreme Court first articulated the concept of a curative writ in “Rupa Ashok Hurra vs Ashok
Hurra (2002) Case”. The bench of the Supreme Court held that the Supreme Court could entertain a
curative petition under the following grounds:
o Violation of principles of natural justice.
o Question of bias against the presiding judge.
o Abuse of the process of the court.
• Curative writs are sparingly used and are narrow is scope.
• These petitions need to be approved by a senior advocate designated by the court.
• Curative writs are filed mostly in death penalty cases.
o However, the Supreme Court in the Yakub Memon case (2015) and the Delhi gang rape convicts
case (2020) dismissed curative writs challenging death sentences.
o In 2023, in the Bhopal gas tragedy case, the Supreme Court refused to exercise its curative
powers to enhance the compensation provided to victims that was deemed grossly inadequate.
Related Constitutional Provision:
• Article 137 of the Constitution of India supports the idea of a curative petition. It states that the “Subject
to the provisions of any law made by Parliament or any rules made under Article 145 of the Constitution
of India, the Supreme Court shall have power to review any judgment pronounced or order made by
it.”
Poll Expenditure
Context:
• With the general elections underway, among the Election Commission’s (EC) key responsibilities is
monitoring poll expenditure, both by parties and individual candidates, through its own observers and
state and Central enforcement agencies.
Background and Analysis for Prelims:
• The Election Commission of India (ECI) monitors poll expenditure and puts limits on it under the
following rules and sections:
• The Representation of the People Act, 1951: This act sets the overall framework for elections in India.
It includes provisions for regulating poll expenditure.
• According to Section 77 (1) of RPA ,1951, candidates are expected to keep an account of expenditure
from date of nomination till date of declaration of results.
• According to Section 123(6) of RPA,1951, spending more than the maximum limit imposed by the
election commission is a corrupt practice.
• According to Section 10A of RPA, 1951, failure to lodge account of election expenses can lead to
disqualification for a period of three years.
The Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961: These rules provide detailed guidelines for the implementation of the
provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. They include provisions for monitoring poll
expenditure and for imposing penalties for violations. As per the rules, the election commission can:
• Appoint expenditure observers to monitor expenses of candidates.
• Order an inquiry into any suspected violation of rules.
• Impose fine of up to Rs. 2 lakhs on a candidate for violating poll expenditure rules.
• The Election Commission (Conduct of Elections) Order, 2004: This order further clarifies the
provisions of the Conduct of Elections Rules. It includes provisions for setting limits on poll expenditure
and for requiring candidates to submit detailed reports of their expenditure.
• With such statutory backing, ECI has taken a number of steps to curb poll expenditure. These include:
• Setting limits on the amount of money that can be spent by candidates.
o Expenditure limit for candidates for Lok Sabha constituencies is Rs 70 lakh-Rs 95 lakh
(depending upon states)
o Expenditure limit for Assembly constituencies is Rs 28 lakh- Rs 40 lakh (depending on states).
• Requiring candidates to submit detailed reports of their expenditure within 30 days of the completion
of the elections.
• Appointing expenditure observers to monitor the expenditure of candidates.
• Ordering inquiries into suspected violations of the rules.
Analysis for Mains:
• Despite these efforts, poll expenditure remains a problem in India. There are a number of reasons for
this, including:
• The limits on poll expenditure for candidates are highly unrealistic. The high costs associated with
advertising, rallies, and other campaign activities compel candidates to seek substantial financial
resources, generally leading to excessive expenditure above the limits.
• There is no cap on a political party’s expenditure. Though, registered political parties have to submit
details of their expenditure within 90 days of elections to Election Commission of India.
• Lack of transparency in reporting of poll expenditure.
• Lack of adequate manpower and resources with ECI hampers its ability to monitor expenditure
effectively across all constituencies.
Way forward:
• ECI needs to take more effective steps to curb poll expenditure if it wants to ensure that elections are
free and fair. As a way forward, following steps can be taken:
• Stringent implementation and enforcement of existing rules and reviewing the limits periodically.
• Setting up a dedicated unit to monitor, track and investigate suspected violations poll expenditure by
candidates
• Using latest technology such as Artificial intelligence and machine learning to monitor poll expenditure.
• Educating voters about poll expenditure to hold candidates accountable for their spending.
• Increasing transparency in reporting of poll expenditure as advocated by Indrajit Gupta Committee.
Associated Additional Information:
Lok Sabha Expenditure limit for candidates over the years:
• The evolution of spending limits for Lok Sabha candidates in India's general elections illustrates a
gradual increase over the decades:
• 1951-52: In the inaugural general election, Lok Sabha candidates were permitted to spend a maximum
of Rs 25,000, with lower caps of Rs 10,000 in some Northeastern states.
• 1971: Spending caps saw their first adjustment, rising to Rs 35,000 for most states.
• 1980: A significant increase occurred, with the spending cap raised to Rs 1 lakh per candidate.
• 1984: Further adjustments saw the cap rise to Rs 1.5 lakh in some states and Rs 1.3 lakh in smaller states,
while states with one to two Lok Sabha seats were limited to Rs 1 lakh.
• 1996: Post-liberalization, spending limits for most states tripled to Rs 4.5 lakh, with variations based on
Union Territory status and the number of seats.
• 1998: The spending cap escalated further, reaching Rs 15 lakh.
• 2004: Another increase saw the limit set at Rs 25 lakh.
• 2014: The cap was more than doubled, soaring to Rs 70 lakh.
• 2022: After the 2019 polls, the spending cap was adjusted to its current figures.
Scheduled and Tribal Areas and Union Territories
Article 244(A) of the Constitution
Context:
• In Assam’s tribal-majority Diphu Lok Sabha constituency, candidates of all parties have promised the
implementation of Article 244(A) of the Constitution.
Background:
• Article 244(A) was inserted by The Constitution (Twenty-second Amendment) Act, 1969.
Analysis for Prelims:
About 244(A): Formation of an autonomous State comprising certain tribal areas in Assam and creation of
local Legislature or Council of Ministers or both thereof.
• It enables Parliament to pass an Act to “form within the State of Assam an autonomous State comprising
(whether wholly or in part) all or any of the tribal areas specified in Part I of the table appended to
paragraph 20 of the Sixth Schedule and create thereof:
o A body, whether elected or partly nominated and partly elected, to function as a Legislature for
the autonomous Stale, or
o A Council of Ministers,or both with such constitution, powers and functions, in each case, as
may be specified in the law”.
• A law passed under this Article is not deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution for the
purposes of Article 368, notwithstanding that it contains any provision which amends or has the effect
of amending the Constitution.
Analysis for Mains:
• There can be potential positives and negatives associated with forming an autonomous state under this
provision:
Potential Positives:
• Increased Autonomy and Empowerment: This provision allows tribal communities to have a greater
say in governing their own affairs. An autonomous state with its own legislature and council of
ministers, could enable them to address local issues and development priorities specific to their
communities.
• Preservation of Culture and Identity: Tribal communities often have unique cultural practices and
traditions. An autonomous state could provide a platform to preserve and promote these aspects of
their identity.
• Socio-economic Development: The devolution of power and resources to the autonomous state could
lead to more focused efforts on improving the socio-economic conditions of tribal communities. This
could involve initiatives in education, healthcare, infrastructure development and livelihood generation
tailored to their specific needs.
• Reduction of Grievances: Granting greater autonomy could potentially address feelings of
marginalization and neglect often experienced by tribal communities. Increased participation in
decision-making processes could foster a sense of ownership and reduce grievances.
Potential Negatives:
• Administrative Complexity: Creating a new state-level administrative structure can be complex and
expensive. Duplication of existing administrative functions could lead to inefficiencies and strain on
resources.
• Potential for Conflict: The formation of an autonomous state within an existing state could lead to
tensions with other communities residing in the territory. Delimitation of boundaries and power-
sharing arrangements need careful consideration to ensure inclusivity and avoid conflict.
• Financial Viability: The economic viability of a small, newly formed state is a concern. Financial
dependence on the central government could hinder its ability to effectively address development
challenges.
• Disruption of Existing Systems: The transition to an autonomous state could disrupt existing
administrative structures and service delivery mechanisms. Ensuring a smooth transition and
continuity of essential services is crucial.
Conclusion:
• The decision to form a state under Article 244(A) requires careful consideration of both potential
benefits and drawbacks. A thorough evaluation of factors like the size and economic strength of the
proposed autonomous state, the needs and aspirations of the tribal communities, and the potential
impact on existing administrative structures is vital. Open dialogue and consensus-building involving
all stakeholders are essential for a successful implementation.
Associated Additional Information:
About Diphu:
• Diphu is the most sparsely populated of Assam’s 14 Lok Sabha constituencies.
• It is reserved for Scheduled Tribes (STs), and covers six legislative Assembly segments in three tribal-
majority hill districts of Assam: Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong, and Dima Hasao.
o These three districts are administered under the provisions of the Sixth Schedule of the
Constitution, which describes the “Provisions as to the Administration of Tribal Areas in the
States of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram”.
Mains Practice Question :
• Question: Evaluate the merits and demerits of forming autonomous states under Article 244(A) for
tribal communities. Suggest a framework for successful implementation.
Governance and Social Justice
Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA)
Context:
Recently,
• The Union Home Minister said the Centre will consider revoking the Armed Forces (Special Powers)
Act in Jammu and Kashmir.
• The Ministry of Home Affairs extended the term of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act in three
districts of Arunachal Pradesh, eight districts of Nagaland and several other areas falling under 24
police stations in the two states for six more months from April 1, declaring them as disturbed areas.
• The Manipur home department has extended the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act or AFSPA, 1958,
for another six months in the state.
Background:
• The origin of Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) can be traced back to the Quit India
Movement of 1942:
o During the Quit India Movement, the British government used the Armed Forces (Special
Powers) Ordinance, 1942 to give the armed forces wide-ranging powers to suppress the
movement.
o The ordinance was repealed after India gained independence in 1947.
• In 1958, the Indian government passed the Armed Forces (Assam and Manipur) Special Powers Act,
1958 in response to the Naga insurgency in the North-East of India under the G.B. Pant, the then Home
Minister.
Analysis for Prelims:
Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) gives special powers to the Armed forces in so called
“disturbed areas”.
• An area can be declared as disturbed under Section 3 of AFSPA.
• The Governor of the state or the administrator of that Union Territory or the Central Government can
declare an area as a “disturbed area”.
o In Inderjit Barua vs the State of Assam Case, the court held that the Governor is empowered
to declare any area of the State as “disturbed area”. It could not be arbitrary on ground of
absence of legislative guidelines.
• An Area can be declared as “disturbed area” if there is satisfaction that the situation calls for the use of
armed forces in aid of the civil power.
AFSPA gives the armed forces the power to:
• Arrest any person without a warrant and detain them for up to 24 hours who has committed a
cognizable offence or against whom a reasonable suspicion exists that he has committed or is about to
commit a cognizable offence.
o Any person arrested and taken into custody under this Act should be made over to the officer
in charge of the nearest police station with the least possible delay, together with a report of the
circumstances occasioning the arrest.
▪ In Horendi Gogoi vs Union of India case (1991): The court held that in case of arrest of
any person, army authority is duty bound to handover to the officer-in-charge of the
nearest police station with least possible delay.
• Use such force as may be necessary to effect the arrest.
• Search any premises without a warrant.
• Use force or fire upon any person who is acting in contravention of any law or order for the time being
in force in the disturbed area.
• Destroy shelters and hide-outs of perpetrators carrying out armed attacks.
• AFSPA also gives armed forces an immunity from prosecution for any action taken under the law. Prior
sanction of Central government is required for prosecution.
• In Luithukia vs Rishang Keishing Case, the Court held that the armed forces must act in cooperation
with the district administration and not as an independent body. Armed Forces should work in
harmony when they are deployed in disturbed area.
Analysis for Mains:
Significance of AFSPA:
• Counters the threat of insurgency and terrorism: The law gives the armed forces the necessary tools to
protect the lives of civilians and maintain law and order in areas infested by threat of insurgency and
terrorism.
• Helps maintain law and order in disturbed areas.
• Acts as deterrent factor: AFSPA deters insurgents and terrorists from carrying out attacks. The
knowledge that the security forces have the power to take decisive action against them acts as a
deterrent and hence helps to prevent violence and bloodshed.
• Gives Confidence to armed forces for stringent action: The law gives immunity from prosecution for
any action taken under the law to the security forces. The forces can take proper action without the fear
getting embroiled in legal battles.
Criticism of AFSPA:
• The law has given unfettered powers to the armed forces without actual accountability mechanism.
• There have been allegations that it has been used to violate the human rights of civilians. There have
been widespread instances of extended custody, extrajudicial killings, torture, and rape by the security
forces.
• It has also created a climate of fear and mistrust in the areas where it is in force.
• More often than not, armed forces in disturbed areas end up encroaching upon the jurisdiction of state
police forces.
• It has also been used to suppress dissent and target minorities (Justice Hegde Commission, formed on
the directions of the Supreme Court)
Conclusion:
• AFSPA is a complex law with a long history. It is both controversial and necessary. Hence, it is
important to weigh the potential benefits of the law against the potential risks before deciding whether
or not it should be implemented in an area, reformed or repealed altogether.
Associated Additional Information:
Supreme Court Judgements:
• Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of AFSPA in Naga People's Movement of Human Rights
v. Union of India (1998) case but gave certain cautions in the form of 'dos and don'ts' by the armed
forces chief.
• In Extra Judicial Execution Victim Families Association v. Union of India case, Supreme Court ruled
that the AFSPA does not give the armed forces the power to use excessive force. The Court also ruled
that the armed forces should also investigate all allegations of human rights violations and take
appropriate action against those responsible.
Committee recommendations:
• The Jeevan Reddy Committee (2005) recommended that the AFSPA be repealed and that the essential
provisions of the act be inserted into the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act of 1967. It also concluded
that the powers conferred under the Act are not absolute.
• The Justice Verma Committee (2013) observed that AFSPA legitimizes the immunity against sexual
violence against women. It recommended that the AFSPA be reviewed and amended to ensure that it
is in conformity with the Supreme Court of India’s judgements, Constitution of India and international
human rights standards.
• Justice Hegde Commission (2013) recommended that the Act must be properly reviewed every six
months to see if its implementation is necessary. Besides, the government should provide compensation
to the victims of human rights violations.
• Second Administrative Reforms Commission (headed by M Veerappa Moily): The report on public
order recommended that the AFSPA be repealed.
Associated additional information:
AFSPA has been in force in the following states and union territories of India at one time or another:
• Arunachal Pradesh
• Assam
• Manipur
• Meghalaya
• Mizoram
• Nagaland
• Tripura
• Jammu and Kashmir
Mains PYQ :
• Question: Human rights activists constantly highlight the fact that the Armed forces (Special Powers)
Act, 1958 (AFSPA) is a draconian act leading to cases of human rights abuses by security forces. What
sections of AFSPA are opposed by the activists? Critically evaluate the requirement with reference to
the view held by the Apex Court. (UPSC Mains 2015)