Scribd
Upload
1K views2 pages

Rbi Request Letter

Uploaded by

sir9453666sir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views2 pages

Rbi Request Letter

Uploaded by

sir9453666sir
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
4th Level, C- Wing,
Delhi Secretariat,
New Delhi;
+91-11-23392280

Case No: 19219/IPC328/154 Date: 08/05/2024

Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud


CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
5, Krishna Menon Marg, Sunehri Bagh,
New Delhi, India

All magnificent directories,

Below, every dignitary and every high-ranking official follows the directives to
the letter and handles the issue in a discreet and secret manner. Everyone has
stepped in to support the specific client during the course of the litigation,
which began on April 10, 2024.

1.HASIT RUDRESHKUMAR MEHTA;ID-6453 1113 4193


2.JASMINE HASIT MEHTA;ID-7856 7888 6800

RESIDENTIAL ADDRESS:
E-307,SALARPURIA SENORITA,SARJAPUR ROAD,
OPP WIPRO CORPORATE OFFICE,
VTC: KAIKONDAHALLI,
PO: CARMELARAM,
BANGALORE,KARNATAKA-560035

To,

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA,


8-9, Lohia Path, opposite Fun Republic, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar
Pradesh 226010

CBI Court
Mahatma Gandhi Marg, Qaisar Bagh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001
CBI OFFICE
14, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Aminabad, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226001

ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE,LUCKNOW
2nd floor, Princeton Business Park, 16, Ashok Marg, Hazratganj, Lucknow, Uttar
Pradesh 226001

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND


1900 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20431

HIGH COURT,LUCKNOW
Chamber no-311, Block-E, High Court, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar
Pradesh 226010

The Indian Supreme Court came to the judgment that after auditing both suspects'
accounts, no one was found guilty. It is discovered during the present audit
procedure that the client invested the money in a demat trading account, which is
likewise deemed questionable.

Accordingly, only around half of the entire invested amount in his demat account
was audited, in accordance with the legislation and the specific department's
instruction. There is no deduction of even a single rupee; the entire payment is
refunded. Without conducting an audit or exercising oversight, the corresponding
departments so promptly released the closure order, all refund funds, and the
final clearance letter.

(A.K. Sinha) NIRMALA SITARAMAN


Director to the Government of India (MINISTER OF FINANCE)
Tel. 011-23438176

Department officials involving in this case :

1. SB SHIRODKAR (D.C.P)
2. PRAMOD KUMAR TIWARI(CRIME BRANCH D.C.P)
3. HIMANI CHAUDHARY (FINANCIAL DEPARTMENT HEAD)

You might also like

pFad - Phonifier reborn

Pfad - The Proxy pFad of © 2024 Garber Painting. All rights reserved.

Note: This service is not intended for secure transactions such as banking, social media, email, or purchasing. Use at your own risk. We assume no liability whatsoever for broken pages.


Alternative Proxies:

Alternative Proxy

pFad Proxy

pFad v3 Proxy

pFad v4 Proxy