2024 Y12 IA2 Experiment
2024 Y12 IA2 Experiment
Physics
IA2
Student name
Student number
Teacher
Issued 12/03/2024
Marking summary
Suggested Practicals:
Task
Modify (i.e. refine, extend or redirect) an experiment in order to address your own
related hypothesis or question.
You may use a practical performed in class, a related simulation or another practical
related to Unit 3 (as negotiated with your teacher) as the basis for your methodology
and research question.
To complete this task you must:
*The steps indicated with an asterisk above may be completed in groups. All other
Physics — IA2 Page 3
2022 - 2023
*The steps indicated with an asterisk above may be completed in groups. All other
elements must be completed individually.
Checkpoints
Week 1: Select experiment and identify proposed modifications
Week 2: Perform experiment and analyse data
Week 4: Analyse and evaluate evidence
Week 5: Submit draft
Week 7: Submit final response
Authentication strategies
● You will be provided class time for task completion.
● Your teacher will observe you completing work in class.
● Your teacher will collect and annotate a draft.
● You must acknowledge all sources.
● You will use Turn-it-in to submit your response.
● You will each produce a unique response by, collecting data as a group but
producing individual reports
Scaffolding
The response must be presented using an appropriate scientific genre (i.e. scientific
report) and contain:
● a research question
● a rationale for the experiment
● reference to the initial experiment and identification and justification of
modifications to the methodology
● raw and processed qualitative data and/or quantitative data
● analysis of the evidence
● conclusion/s based on the interpretation of the evidence
● evaluation of the methodology and suggestions of improvements and extensions to
the experiment
● a reference list
An example of how one of the practicals could be developed into a research question
Practical that will be modified:
Physics — IA2 Page 4
2022 - 2023
Practical that will be modified:
Conduct an experiment to investigate the parallel component of the weight of an
object down an inclined plane at various angles
Sample Research question:
What is the relationship between the angle of inclination and the magnitude of the
frictional force for a given rectangular-based wooden object on a given wooden
surface?
Developing the research questions
Description Example
Identify the independent Angle of inclination
variable to be
investigated
Identify the dependent Magnitude of the frictional force acting parallel to the
variable inclined surface
Identify the methodology A rectangular wooden object will be placed on an inclined
to be used plane. The angle of inclination will be modified and the
parallel component of the object’s weight will be
measured using data-logger force meter. This measured
force will be subtracted from the theoretical expected
value of the parallel-to-the-surface component of the
weight to determine the magnitude of the frictional force
acting parallel to the inclined surface
Draft research questions What is the relationship between the angle of inclination
and the frictional force of an inclined surface?
Present research What is the relationship between the angle of inclination
question to teacher for and the magnitude of the frictional force for a given
approval rectangular-based wooden object on a given wooden
surface?
Note: You cannot use this sample research question for your experiment
Assessment objectives
2. apply understanding of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism to modify experimental methodologies and process primary data
5. investigate phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism, through an experiment
• informed application of understanding of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism to modify experimental methodologies demonstrated by
− a considered rationale for the experiment
− justified modifications to the methodology
• effective and efficient investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by 5–6
− a specific and relevant research question
− a methodology that enables the collection of sufficient , relevant data
− considered management of risks and ethical or environmental issues.
• adequate application of understanding of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism to modify experimental methodologies demonstrated by
− a reasonable rationale for the experiment
− feasible modifications to the methodology
• effective investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by 3–4
− a relevant research question
− a methodology that enables the collection of relevant data
− management of risks and ethical or environmental issues.
• rudimentary application of understanding of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism to modify experimental methodologies demonstrated
by
− a vague or irrelevant rationale for the experiment
− inappropriate modifications to the methodology
1–2
• ineffective investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by
− an inappropriate research question
− a methodology that causes the collection of insufficient and irrelevant data
− inadequate management of risks and ethical or environmental issues.
Assessment objectives
2. apply understanding of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism to modify experimental methodologies and process primary data
3. analyse experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism
5. investigate phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism, through an experiment
• appropriate application of algorithms, visual and graphical representations of data about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism
demonstrated by correct and relevant processing of data
• systematic and effective analysis of experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism, demonstrated by
− thorough identification of relevant trends , patterns or relationships 5–6
− thorough and appropriate identification of the uncertainty and limitations of evidence
• effective and efficient investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by the collection of
sufficient and relevant raw data.
• adequate application of algorithms, visual and graphical representations of data about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated
by basic processing of data
• effective analysis of experimental evidence about gravity and motion or electromagnetism, demonstrated by
− identification of obvious trends , patterns or relationships 3–4
− basic identification of uncertainty and limitations of evidence
• effective investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion or electromagnetism, demonstrated by the collection of relevant raw
data.
• rudimentary application of algorithms, visual and graphical representations of gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by
incorrect or irrelevant processing of data
• ineffective analysis of experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by
− identification of incorrect or irrelevant trends , patterns or relationships 1–2
− incorrect or insufficient identification of uncertainty and limitations of evidence
• ineffective investigation of phenomena associated with gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by the collection of insufficient
and irrelevant raw data.
Assessment objectives
4. interpret experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism
6. evaluate experimental processes and conclusions about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism
• insightful interpretation of experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by justified conclusion /s
linked to the research question
• critical evaluation of experimental processes about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by 5–6
− justified discussion of the reliability and validity of the experimental process
− suggested improvements and extensions to the experiment that are logically derived from the analysis of evidence.
• adequate interpretation of experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by reasonable conclusion /
s relevant to the research question
• basic evaluation of experimental processes about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by 3–4
− reasonable description of the reliability and validity of the experimental process
− suggested improvements and extensions to the experiment that are related to the analysis of evidence.
• invalid interpretation of experimental evidence about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by inappropriate or irrelevant
conclusion /s
• superficial evaluation of experimental processes about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism demonstrated by 1–2
− cursory or simplistic statements about the reliability and validity of the experimental process
− ineffective or irrelevant suggestions.
Criterion: Communication
Assessment objectives
7. communicate understandings and experimental findings , arguments and conclusions about gravity and motion, or electromagnetism.
• effective communication of understandings and experimental findings , arguments and conclusions about gravity and motion, or
electromagnetism demonstrated by
− fluent and concise use of scientific language and representations 2
− appropriate use of genre conventions
− acknowledgment of sources of information through appropriate use of referencing conventions.
• adequate communication of understandings and experimental findings , arguments and conclusions about gravity and motion, or
electromagnetism demonstrated by
− competent use of scientific language and representations 1
− use of basic genre conventions
− use of basic referencing conventions.