BA1 Chapter 6
BA1 Chapter 6
The funds available on international capital markets fall into three broad
categories:
The term ‘euromarket’ had its origins in the 1970s. International trading
expanded and this led to new foreign currency markets, such as the Eurodollar
market. In this market, dollar balances earned by European exporters (to the
USA) were held in European banks earning interest on favourable terms
because they are offshore (held outside the country of origin and not subject
to central bank control).
Foreign exchange markets are concerned with the purchase and sale of foreign
exchange. This is primarily for four reasons:
This market enables companies, fund managers, banks and others to buy and
sell foreign currencies. Capital flows arising from trade, investment, loans and
speculative dealing create a large demand for foreign currency, particularly
sterling, US dollars and euros and typically deals worth $2 trillion are traded
daily in London, the world’s largest foreign exchange centre.
London benefits from its geographical location, favourable time intervals (with
the United States and the Far East in particular) and the variety of business
generated there – insurance, commodities, banking, Eurobonds, etc.
Foreign exchange trading may be spot or forward.
This risk arises when the prices of imports or exports are fixed in foreign
currency terms and there is movement in the exchange rate between the date
when the price is agreed and the date when the cash is paid or received in
settlement.
The forward price of a currency is normally higher (at a premium) or lower (at
a discount) than the spot rate. Such premiums (or discounts) reflect interest
rate differentials between currencies and expectations of currency
depreciations and appreciations.
Firms dealing with more than one currency are exposed to risks due to
exchange rate movements. There are three main aspects of this.
If this risk is not managed then the value of the business could be
adversely (or favourably) affected.
b) Transaction risk: In the time period between an order being agreed and
payment received the exchange rate can move causing the final value of
the transaction to be more or less than originally envisaged. This affects
the business’s cash flows and therefore its ability to forecast and
manage its cash position. Transaction risk can be hedged (minimised) in
various ways.
They give the right but not the obligation to buy or sell currency at some
point in the future at a predetermined rate.
A company can therefore: exercise the option if it is in its interests to
do so let it lapse if:
• the spot rate is more favourable
• there is no longer a need to exchange currency.
This risk, however, is not realised unless the asset is sold, so is of less
commercial importance.
However, when the cash is received, suppose the exchange rate has moved to
£1 = $2.10. (Note: the $ has weakened compared to the £ so £1 buys more $)
Similarly, an exchange gain may arise if the exchange rate moves in Company
A's favour (here we would want the $ to strengthen compared to the £). The
key problem lies in being able to predict future exchange rates
Illustration 2 – Economic risk:
If the current exchange rate is $1 = £0.85 and the exporter sets the £ price
now, the invoice price for the product will be $105 × 0.85 = £89.25.
If the exchange rate moves to $1 = $0.90 then a receipt of £89.25 for the
product from the exporter’s customers would mean that (£89.25/0.9) $99.17 is
received by the exporter once the £ have been converted to $.
This would mean that the exporter would no longer be able to make any profit
on this product in the UK market and is in fact not quite covering its costs. The
exporter would have to consider raising the price to remain profitable, but this
would lead to lower competitiveness.
Conversely, if the exchange rate had moved in the opposite direction, the
exporter would be making higher profits on the product in the UK market and
could consider lowering the £ price to improve competitiveness.
Importers would feel the effects of exchange rate movements if they are
paying for goods and services in a foreign currency.
E.g., if the exporter invoiced in $ instead of £, pushing the exchange rate risk
onto the customer, then the UK importer is invoiced for $105. This makes a
payment of £89.25 when the exchange rate is $1 = £0.85 but this would rise to
£94.50 if the exchange rate moves to $1 = £0.90.
A US company has debt denominated in US$ and its existing debt provider has
stipulated in a debt covenant agreement that the company will not take on
further debt above a level of US$1.5 million.
The company then takes out a loan in Euros with a value of €1,000,000. At the
time of the loan being taken out the exchange rate between US$ and € was € =
US$1.3, meaning that it has an effective US$ value of US$1.3 million. This
would not breach the debt covenant.
However, if the exchange rate moved above € = US$1.5 then the US$
value would rise to a higher value than is allowed by the covenant and
the company would be in breach of it.
The exchange of currencies is vital for trade in goods and services. British firms
selling abroad will require foreign buyers to exchange their currency into
sterling to facilitate payment. Similarly, British importers will need to pay out in
foreign currencies. Also, when funds are transferred between people in
different countries, foreign exchange is required.
Demand:
Demand for a currency, sterling say, comes from a number of sources:
• The government (strictly the central bank) may wish to buy sterling to
manipulate the exchange rate.
• Speculators may sell sterling if they feel its value is about to decrease
(depreciate) relative to other currencies.
• The UK government (again, strictly the central bank) may sell currency
on the international markets to weaken the currency to improve export
performance. Today, the sale and purchase of currencies for trading
purposes is dwarfed by the lending and borrowing of funds.
An increase in interest rates will have a two-fold effect. In the short run,
"hot money" will be attracted to UK deposits, increasing demand for
sterling and a corresponding rise in the exchange rate. In the long run,
high interest rates will erode the competitiveness of UK businesses
reducing the supply of and demand for UK goods. This will reduce the
demand for sterling, reducing the exchange rate.
• A trade deficit will result in the demand for sterling to buy exports being
lower than the supply of sterling to buy imports. This will result in
downward pressure on the exchange rate.
• Speculation can influence the exchange rate up or down. This is usually a
short-term factor. In 2016, after the UK’s vote to leave the EU the pound
depreciated sharply. This was attributed by some as the effect of
speculation as to the future stability of the UK economy, with investors
switching their capital into traditionally secure currencies such as the
yen and the Swiss franc
In the diagram, suppose we have a factor that causes British goods to become
less competitive on world markets.
• This will result in a fall in the demand for British exports and hence
causes a shift in the demand curve for sterling to D1.
• This shift causes a fall in the exchange rate to P1, assuming that the
demand for British imports (and hence the supply curve) remains
unchanged.
Note: since the demand and supply of a currency for trade purposes is a tiny
fraction of all demand and supply for a currency, current account
deficits/surpluses are unlikely to have much effect on the exchange rate.
Exchange rate systems – dirty floating:
Some governments will have a policy of fixing the value of their currency
against the value of another currency or to another measure of value, such as
gold. Known as a fixed exchange rate system, this can operate to stabilise the
value of their currency, making international trade easier.
Currency substitution:
Some countries even allow the use of a foreign currency in addition to the
domestic currency (known as currency substitution, or dollarisation when the
foreign currency used is US dollars). They may choose to do this in a period of
economic uncertainty where the home currency may be subject to significant
fluctuation. The use of a stable foreign currency stabilises the value of day to
day transactions.
One way of avoiding exchange rate risk is for each country to use the same
currency. The best-known example of such an arrangement is the plan for
Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), which seeks to establish a single
currency and monetary authority within the European Union.
The Euro:
The Euro was launched on 1 January 1999, with 11 of the then 15 members
agreeing to participate. National currencies were retained until 2002 to be
replaced with Euro notes and coins.
Performance of the Euro against other major world currencies has been
patchy.
In its first year, the Euro depreciated from $1.19 a Euro to $0.80 per Euro,
though it since recovered some of this value.
The European Central Bank (ECB):
The European Central Bank (ECB) began operations in May 1998 as the single
body with the power to issue currency, draft monetary policy, and set interest
rates in the Euro-zone. The Maastricht Treaty envisaged the ECB as an
independent body free from day-to-day political interference, with a principal
duty of price stability.
The ECB is the central bank for the Euro currency area and is based in
Frankfurt.
It is the sole issuer of the Euro. Its main objective, as defined by the Maastricht
Treaty, is price stability. It therefore has the power to set short-term interest
rates.
The main focus of its activities has been on interest rate policy rather than
exchange rate policy. Like the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of
England, the ECB pursues a policy of controlling interest rates as a means of
achieving influence over the long-term rate of inflation.